View source for Sun Language Theory

{{Short description|Turkish nationalist pseudoscientific theory}}
{{Redirect|Sun Theory|the band|Sun Theory (band)}}

{{Linguistics}}
{{Atatürk sidebar}}

The '''Sun Language Theory''' ({{langx|tr|Güneş Dil Teorisi}}) was a [[Turkish nationalism|Turkish]] [[Pseudoscientific language comparison|pseudolinguistic]],<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Asher |first1=R. E. |url= |title=The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics |last2=Simpson |first2=J. M. Y. |date=1994 |publisher=Pergamon Press |isbn=978-0-08-035943-4 |volume=6 |pages=3391 |language=en}}</ref> [[pseudoscientific]]<ref>{{Cite book |last=Hintz |first=Lisel |url= |title=Identity Politics Inside Out: National Identity Contestation and Foreign Policy in Turkey |date=2018 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-065599-0 |pages=63–64 |language=en}}</ref> quasi-hypothesis developed in [[Turkey]] in the 1930s that proposed that all human [[language]]s are descendants of one [[Proto-Turkic language|proto-Turkic]] primal language. The theory's promotion of Turks as a progenitor race led to it finding favour among Turkish [[ultranationalist]]s, who used it to justify their nationalist ideology.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |url=https://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/sun-language-theory |title=Sun Language Theory |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Hermann |first=Rainer |url= |title=Where is Turkey Headed?: Culture Battles in Turkey |date=2014 |publisher=Blue Dome Press |isbn=978-1-935295-72-3 |pages=79 |language=en |quote=the sun language theory, which was abandoned in 1938, claimed that all languages had developed from Turkish. This kind of ultra nationalism had two different cloaks...}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Somay |first=B. |url= |title=The Psychopolitics of the Oriental Father: Between Omnipotence and Emasculation |date=2014 |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-1-137-46266-4 |pages=215 |language=en}}</ref>

It claims that primal language had close [[phonemic]] resemblances to Turkish and, because of this, all other languages can be traced back to Turkic roots. According to the theory, this primal language originated among Central Asian worshippers who created it as a means to salute the omnipotence of the sun and its life-giving qualities, hence the name.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Aytürk, İlker |date=November 2004 |title=Turkish Linguists against the West: The Origins of Linguistic Nationalism in Atatürk's Turkey |journal=Middle Eastern Studies |volume=40 |issue=6 |pages=1–25 |doi=10.1080/0026320042000282856 |issn=0026-3206 |oclc=86539631|hdl=11693/49528 |s2cid=144968896 |hdl-access=free }}</ref>

==Origins==
Influences on the theory included:

* the ideas of the [[France|French]] historian [[Hilaire de Barenton]], expressed in "''L'Origine des Langues, des Religions et des Peuples''" ("The Origin of Languages, Religions and Peoples"), that all languages originated from [[hieroglyph]]s and [[cuneiform]] used by [[Sumer]]ians.<ref name="nytimes">
{{Cite news |title=Turks Teach New Theories |date=1936-02-09 | url= http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F70914FC395F167B93CBA91789D85F428385F9 |newspaper=[[New York Times]] |place=Istanbul}}
</ref><ref name=":2">{{Cite news|date=2 March 1936|title=Urges Turks to teach culture of their race, Kemal says historians have maligned people, Sun Language revived|page=24|work=[[The News Journal]]}}</ref><ref>[[Geoffrey Lewis (scholar)|Lewis, Geoffrey]] (2002) p.62</ref> Turkish linguists claimed a Turkish origin for the Sumerians, and therefore the origin of language was Turkish.<ref name=":2" />   

* a paper of the [[Austria]]n linguist [[Hermann Feodor Kvergić|Hermann F. Kvergić]] of [[Vienna]] entitled "''La psychologie de quelques éléments des langues Turques''" ("The Psychology of Some Elements of the [[Turkic Languages]]").<ref>
{{cite journal |author=Laut, Jens Peter |year=2002 |title=Noch einmal zu Dr. Kvergić |url=http://www.freidok.uni-freiburg.de/volltexte/1830/pdf/Laut_Noch_einmal_zu_Dr_Kvergic.pdf |format=PDF reprinted online |journal=Turkic Languages |language=German |volume=6 |pages=120–133 |doi= |issn=1431-4983 |oclc=37421320 |id={{URN|nbn|de:bsz:25-freidok-18307}} |access-date=2007-12-05}}
</ref> He also conducted some research on the theory with support of the Turkish Embassy in Vienna.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Aytürk |first=İlker |date=2009 |title=H. F. Kvergić and the Sun-Language Theory |url=https://menadoc.bibliothek.uni-halle.de/dmg/periodical/titleinfo/1446975 |journal=Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft |volume=159 |issue=1 |pages=27–28 |doi= |issn=0341-0137 |jstor=10.13173/zeitdeutmorggese.159.1.0023|hdl=11693/49479 |hdl-access=}}</ref>
During ten months in late 1935 and early 1936 Turkish linguists from the Turkish Language Society developed the Sun Language Theory which was presented as the source of all languages in the Third Turkish Language Congress.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last=Çolak|first=Yilmaz|date=2004|title=Language Policy and Official Ideology in Early Republican Turkey|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4289953|journal=Middle Eastern Studies|volume=40|issue=6|pages=67–91|doi=10.1080/0026320042000282883|jstor=4289953|s2cid=145469817|issn=0026-3206|url-access=subscription}}</ref>

== History ==
The theory counted on the approval of the first president of the Republic of Turkey, [[Mustafa Kemal Atatürk]], who not only gave the theory official backing and material support<ref>
See [[Speros Vryonis]]. ''The Turkish State and History: Clio meets the Grey Wolf, 2nd Ed''. Thessaloniki: Institute for Balkan Studies, 1993.</ref> but was also an important contributor to its development.<ref name="LewisTLRbook">{{cite book|last=Lewis|first=Geoffrey|title=The Turkish Language Reform: A Catastrophic Success|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2002|pages=57|author-link=Geoffrey Lewis (scholar)}}</ref> It received the formal support of the Turkish Government during the Third Turkish Language Congress in 1936.<ref>Aytürk, İlker (2004), p.16</ref><ref name=":1" /> During the same congress the vast majority of the international non-Turkish scholars including {{Interlanguage link|Friedrich Giese (Orientalist)|lt=Friedrich Giese|de}} opposed the theory.<ref>Aytürk, İlker (2004), p.18</ref> One of the few non-Turkish linguists who supported the theory was Kvergić.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Laut|first=Jens Peter|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Gxr0Bl1rvIcC&q=Hermann+Feodor+Kvergi%C3%A7%22.&pg=PA95|title=Das Türkische als Ursprache?: Sprachwissenschaftliche Theorien in der Zeit des erwachenden türkischen Nationalismus|date=2000|publisher=Otto Harrassowitz Verlag|isbn=978-3-447-04396-0|pages=105|language=de}}</ref>  

=== Influence in Turkey ===
Since the theory claimed that all words had originated from Turkish, it was not deemed necessary anymore to replace all foreign [[Replacement of loanwords in Turkish|loanwords in the language]], a process that had been initiated before.<ref name=":1" /> Initially the theory was taught only in the [[Turkology]] departments of the Turkish Universities, but on the order of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, it was to be taught in all departments as a mandatory assignment.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Göçek|first=Fatma Müge|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xHcRDAAAQBAJ&dq=ali+cenani&pg=PA613|title=Denial of Violence: Ottoman Past, Turkish Present, and Collective Violence Against the Armenians, 1789-2009|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|year=2015|isbn=978-0-19-933420-9|pages=288|language=en|author-link=Fatma Müge Göçek}}</ref> The Sun Language Theory lost its prominent role shortly after the death of Mustafa Kemal in November 1938<ref>Szurek, Emmanuel (2019), p.266</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last=Ertürk|first=Nergis|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aJTPlrRH7F4C|title=Grammatology and Literary Modernity in Turkey|date=2011-10-19|publisher=Oxford University Press, USA|isbn=978-0-19-974668-2|pages=103|language=en}}</ref> and was not even mentioned in the next Turkish Language Congress in 1942.<ref>Ertürk, Nergis (2011), p.99 </ref>

In the 1990s, definitions and comments were made by some authors{{who?|date=May 2024}} about the founding principles of the Republic of Turkey, its actions in its first years, and Atatürk's Principles, such as the official state ideology and the denial of ethnicity, by citing the Sun Language Theory studies.<ref>''Paradigmanın İflası, Resmi İdeolojinin Eleştirisine Giriş'', [[Fikret Başkaya]], 1991, ISBN 975-8449-16-8</ref><ref>''Türk Tarih Tezi, Güneş-Dil Teorisi ve Kürt Sorunu'', [[İsmail Beşikçi]], 1991</ref> For this purpose, it was written that irrational rumors were fabricated about the Sun Language Theory and the Turkish History Thesis supported by Atatürk and that Atatürk was wanted to be shown as "a person who believes in nonsense". It is argued that these are purposeful publications made under the influence of the postmodernist wave, with the aim of criticizing the Atatürk Revolutions and their effects.<ref>Türk tarih tezi ve [[Mu kıtası]], Kemal Şenoğlu, ISBN 975-343-473-1</ref>{{Vague|date=May 2024}}

==Tenets==
As described in a 1936 ''[[New York Times]]'' article on the curriculum of the newly opened School of Language, History, and Geography of [[Ankara University]], the theory<ref name="nytimes" /><blockquote>claims that [insofar as] the Sumerians, being Turks, originat[ed] in Central Asia, all languages also consequently originated there and [were] first used by the Turks. The first language, in fact, came into being in this way: Prehistoric man, i.e., Turks in the most primitive stage, was so struck by the effects of the sun on life that he made of it a deity whence sprang all good and evil. Thence came to him light, darkness, warmth, and fire, with it were associated all ideas of time: height, distance, movement, size, and give expression to his feelings. The sun was thus the first thing to which a name was given. It was "ag" {{Sic||expected=It is originally written as "ağ".}} (pronounced agh), and from this syllable all words in use today are derived. This, briefly, is the theory about the "sun language," and with the new conception of Turkish history it will be taught in the new Angora school.</blockquote>Based upon a heliocentric view of the origin of civilization and human languages, the theory claimed that the Turkish language was the language which all civilized languages derived from.<ref>Cemal Kafadar (1996.). ''Between Two Worlds: The Construction of the Ottoman State''. [[University of California Press]]. P. 163.</ref> According to the theory, the first people to speak were the superior race of the Alpine Brachycephalic Turks, which spread throughout the earth in the aftermath of a climate catastrophe, therefore providing the people in all civilizations with the benefits of the language.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Szurek|first=Emmanuel|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=b-W9wgEACAAJ|title=Kemalism: Transnational Politics in the Post-Ottoman World|date=2019|publisher=[[I.B. Tauris]]|isbn=978-1-78831-372-8|editor-last=Clayer|editor-first=Nathalie|pages=265|language=en}}</ref> 

Some of the words provided with false Turkish etymologies through the practice of ''[[:wikt:goropism|goropism]]'' were ''God'', attributed to the Turkish ''kut'';<ref name=":3">[[Geoffrey Lewis (scholar)|Lewis, Geoffrey]] (2002).p.60</ref> ''Bulletin'' from Turkish ''bülten,''<ref name=":4">[[Geoffrey Lewis (scholar)|Lewis, Geoffrey]] (2002). pp.62–63</ref> ''belleten'';<ref>{{Cite book|last=Landau|first=Jacob M.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8_n93Kq5PwMC|title=Atatürk and the Modernization of Turkey|date=1984|publisher=BRILL|isbn=978-90-04-07070-7|location=|pages=207|language=en|author-link=Jacob M. Landau}}</ref><ref name=":4" /> or ''Electric'' from [[Uyghur language|Uyghur]] ''yaltrık'' (shine).<ref name=":3" /> But also foreign words like the French [[:fr:Wattman|wattman]], in French stemming from [[watt]] and [[man]], were claimed to be of Turkish origin by a Turkish scholar.<ref name=":0">Landau, Jacob M. (1984). p.211</ref> Other prominent examples are Greek mythological figures like [[Aphrodite]] from [[wiktionary:avrat|avrat]], or [[Artemis]] from [[wiktionary:tertemiz|tertemiz]].<ref name=":0" /> According to linguist Ghil'ad Zuckermann, "it is possible that the Sun Language Theory was adopted by [[Mustafa Kemal Atatürk|Atatürk]] in order to legitimize the Arabic and Persian words which the Turkish language authorities did not manage to uproot. This move compensated for the failure to provide a neologism for every foreignism/loanword."<ref>Zuckermann, Ghil’ad (2003), [http://www.palgrave.com/products/title.aspx?is=140391723X ‘‘Language Contact and Lexical Enrichment in Israeli Hebrew’’] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140201235515/http://www.palgrave.com/products/title.aspx?is=140391723X |date=2014-02-01 }}, Houndmills: [[Palgrave Macmillan]], {{ISBN|1-4039-1723-X}}, p. 165.</ref>

==See also==
*[[Turkish History Thesis]]
*[[Adamic language]]
*[[Johannes Goropius Becanus]]
*[[Japhetic theory]]
*[[Khazar theory]]
*[[Lemurian Tamil]]
*[[Kemalist historiography]]
*[[Western Pseudohistory Theory]]

==Notes==
{{Reflist|2}}

==Further reading==

{{Refbegin}}
* {{citation|author=Arkman, Ceren |year=2006 |title=The Launching of the Turkish Thesis of History: A Close Textual Analysis |url=http://digital.sabanciuniv.edu/tezler/etezfulltext/arkmanceren.pdf |version=M.A. Thesis |publisher=[[Sabancı University]] |access-date=2007-12-05 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070306094100/http://digital.sabanciuniv.edu/tezler/etezfulltext/arkmanceren.pdf |archive-date=March 6, 2007 }} 
* {{cite journal |author=Aydingün, Ayşegül |author2=Aydingün, İsmail |year=2004 |title=The Role of Language in the Formation of Turkish National Identity and Turkishness |journal=Nationalism & Ethnic Politics |volume=10 |issue=3 |pages=415–432 |doi=10.1080/13537110490518264 |issn=1353-7113 |oclc=86549020|hdl=11511/40574 |s2cid=145324008 |hdl-access=free }}
* {{cite book |author=Dilaçar, Agop |authorlink=Agop Dilaçar |year=1936 |title=Les bases Bio-Psychologiques de la Théorie Güneş Dil |location=Istanbul |publisher=Fazilet Basimevi |oclc=162658746}} {{in lang|fr|tr}}
* {{cite book |author=Karpat, Kemal H. |authorlink=Kemal Karpat |year=2004 |title=Studies on Turkish Politics and Society: Selected Articles and Essays |series=Social, Economic, and Political Studies of the Middle East, vol. 94|location=Leiden, Netherlands and Boston, MA |publisher=Brill |isbn=978-90-04-13322-8 |oclc=52334897}}
* {{citation|author=Kıbrıs, Güldeniz |year=2005 |title=Creating Turkishness: An Examination of Turkish Nationalism Through Gök-Börü |url=http://digital.sabanciuniv.edu/tezler/etezfulltext/kibrisg.pdf |version=M.A. Thesis |publisher=[[Sabancı University]] |access-date=2007-12-05 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100119205732/http://digital.sabanciuniv.edu/tezler/etezfulltext/kibrisg.pdf |archive-date=January 19, 2010 }} 
* {{cite book |author=Lewis, Geoffrey |authorlink=Geoffrey Lewis (Turkish scholar) |year=1999 |title=The Turkish Language Reform: A Catastrophic Success |location=Oxford |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |isbn=978-0-19-823856-0 |oclc=41137543}} 
* {{cite book |author=Poulton, Hugh |year=1997 |title=Top Hat, Grey Wolf and Crescent: Turkish Nationalism and the Turkish Republic |location=London |publisher=C. Hurst & Co. |isbn=978-1-85065-326-4 |oclc=37787056}}
* {{cite book |author=Shaw, Wendy M.K. |year=2004 |chapter=Whose Hittites, and Why? Language, Archaeology, and the Quest for the Original Turks |title=Archaeology Under Dictatorship |url=https://archive.org/details/archaeologyunder00gala |url-access=limited |editor=Michael L. Galaty |editor2=Charles Watkinson|location=New York |publisher=Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers |pages=[https://archive.org/details/archaeologyunder00gala/page/n135 131]–154 |isbn=978-0-306-48508-4 |oclc=54685395}}
*[[Speros Vryonis|Vryonis, Speros]] (1993). ''The Turkish State and History: Clio meets the Grey Wolf, 2nd Ed''. Thessaloniki: Institute for Balkan Studies. 
* {{cite book |author=Webster, Donald Everett |year=1939 |title=The Turkey of Atatürk: Social Process in the Turkish Reformation |location=Philadelphia, PA |publisher=[[American Academy of Political and Social Science]] |oclc=404655}}
{{Refend}}

{{Turkish nationalism}}

[[Category:Kemalism]]
[[Category:Ethnocentrism]]
[[Category:Far-right politics in Turkey]]
[[Category:Pseudoscience]]
[[Category:Pseudohistory]]
[[Category:History of the Republic of Turkey]]
[[Category:Language and mysticism]]
[[Category:National mysticism]]
[[Category:History of linguistics]]
[[Category:Turkish nationalism]]
[[Category:Pseudolinguistics]]
[[Category:Historiography of Turkey]]