View source for Sexuality in ancient Rome

{{short description|Attitudes and behaviors towards sex in ancient Rome}}
<!-- PLEASE USE DISCRETION IN ADDING IMAGES and write a caption to explain how the image you're adding illustrates the specific content you're placing it next to. Too many images make this very long article hard to read, and non-illustrative or unexplained images are distracting-->

{{very long|date=November 2024}}
[[File:Pompeii - Casa del Fauno - Satyr and Nymph - MAN.jpg|thumb|[[Satyr]] and [[nymph]], mythological symbols of sexuality on a [[mosaic]] from a bedroom in [[Pompeii]].]]

Sexual attitudes and behaviors in [[ancient Rome]] are indicated by [[Roman art|art]], [[Latin literature|literature]], and [[Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum|inscriptions]], and to a lesser extent by [[classical archaeology|archaeological remains]] such as erotic artifacts and [[Roman architecture|architecture]]. It has sometimes been assumed that "unlimited sexual license" was characteristic of ancient Rome,<ref>[[#Edwards|Edwards]], p. 65.</ref><ref>"The sexuality of the Romans has never had good press in the West ever since the rise of Christianity. In the popular imagination and culture, it is synonymous with sexual license and abuse": Beert C. Verstraete and {{Not a typo|Provencal}}, Vernon, eds., ''Same-Sex Desire and Love in Greco-Roman Antiquity and in the Classical Tradition'' (Haworth Press, 2005), p. 5. For an extended discussion of how the modern perception of Roman sexual decadence can be traced to early [[Christian polemic]], see Alastair J.&nbsp;L. Blanshard, "Roman Vice," in ''Sex: Vice and Love from Antiquity to Modernity'' (Wiley-Blackwell, 2010), pp. 1–88.</ref> but sexuality was not excluded as a concern of the ''[[mos maiorum]]'', the traditional [[social norms]] that affected public, private, and military life.<ref>Karl-J. Hölkeskamp, ''Reconstructing the Roman Republic: An Ancient Political Culture and Modern Research'' (Princeton University Press, 2010), pp. 17–18.</ref> ''Pudor'', "shame, modesty", was a regulating factor in behavior,<ref>[[#Langlands|Langlands]], p. 17.</ref> as were legal strictures on certain sexual transgressions in both the [[Roman Republic|Republican]] and [[Roman Empire|Imperial]] periods.<ref>[[#Langlands|Langlands]], p. 20.</ref> The [[Roman censor|censors]]—[[Roman magistrate|public officials]] who determined the [[Social class in ancient Rome|social rank]] of individuals—had the power to remove [[Roman citizenship|citizens]] from the [[Roman senate|senatorial]] or [[equestrian order]] for sexual misconduct, and on occasion did so.<ref>[[#Fantham|Fantham]], p. 121</ref><ref>[[#Richlin1993|Richlin (1993)]], p. 556. Under the Empire, the emperor assumed the powers of the censors (p. 560).</ref> The mid-20th-century sexuality theorist [[Michel Foucault]] regarded sex throughout the [[Greco-Roman world]] as governed by restraint and the art of managing sexual pleasure.<ref>[[Michel Foucault]], ''The History of Sexuality: The Care of the Self'' (New York: Vintage Books, 1988), vol. 3, p. 239 (on the contrast with the [[Religion and sexuality#Christianity|Christian view of sex]] as "linked to evil") ''et passim'', as summarized by Inger Furseth and Pål Repstad, ''An Introduction to the Sociology of Religion: Classical and Contemporary Perspectives'' (Ashgate, 2006), p. 64.</ref>

Roman society was [[patriarchy|patriarchal]] (see ''[[paterfamilias]]''), and [[masculinity]] was premised on a capacity for governing oneself and others of lower status, not only in war and politics, but also in sexual relations.<ref>[[#Cantarella|Cantarella]], p. xii.</ref> ''[[virtus (virtue)|Virtus]]'', "virtue", was an active masculine ideal of self-discipline, related to the [[Latin]] word for "man", ''vir''. The corresponding ideal for a woman was ''[[pudicitia]]'', often translated as chastity or modesty, but it was a more positive and even competitive personal quality that displayed both her attractiveness and self-control.<ref>[[#Langlands|Langlands]], pp. 37–38.</ref> [[Women in ancient Rome|Roman women]] of the upper classes were expected to be well educated, strong of character, and active in maintaining their family's standing in society.<ref>[[#Cantarella|Cantarella]], pp. xii–xiii.</ref> With extremely few exceptions, surviving Latin literature preserves the voices of educated male Romans on sexuality. Visual art was created by those of lower social status and of a greater range of ethnicity, but was tailored to the taste and inclinations of those wealthy enough to afford it, including, in the [[Roman Empire|Imperial era]], former slaves.<ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], pp. 9, 153ff.</ref>

Some sexual attitudes and behaviors in [[Culture of ancient Rome|ancient Roman culture]] differ markedly from those in later [[Western culture|Western societies]].<ref>[[#Langlands|Langlands]], p. 31, especially note 55</ref><ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], p. 11.</ref> [[Religion in ancient Rome|Roman religion]] promoted sexuality as an aspect of prosperity for the state, and individuals might turn to private religious practice or "[[Magic in the Greco-Roman world|magic]]" for improving their erotic lives or reproductive health. [[Prostitution in ancient Rome|Prostitution]] was legal, public, and widespread.<ref name="Strong 2016">{{cite book |last=Strong |first=Anise K. |year=2016 |title=Prostitutes and Matrons in the Roman World |chapter=Prostitutes and matrons in the urban landscape |location=[[Cambridge]] |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |pages=142–170 |doi=10.1017/CBO9781316563083.007 |doi-access=free |isbn=9781316563083}}</ref> "Pornographic" paintings were featured among the art collections in respectable upperclass households.<ref>[[#McGinn2004|McGinn (2004)]], p. 164.</ref> It was considered natural and unremarkable for men to be sexually attracted to teen-aged youths of both sexes, and even [[Greek love#Ancient Rome|pederasty]] was condoned as long as the younger male partner was not a freeborn Roman. "[[Homosexual]]" and "[[heterosexual]]" did not form the primary dichotomy of Roman thinking about sexuality, and no [[Latin]] words for these concepts exist.<ref>[[#Williams|Williams]], p. 304, citing Saara Lilja, ''Homosexuality in Republican and Augustan Rome'' (Societas Scientiarum Fennica, 1983), p. 122.</ref> No moral censure was directed at the man who enjoyed sex acts with either women or males of inferior status, as long as his behaviors revealed no weaknesses or excesses, nor infringed on the rights and prerogatives of his masculine peers. While perceived [[#Effeminacy and transvestism|effeminacy]] was denounced, especially in political rhetoric, sex in moderation with male prostitutes or slaves was not regarded as improper or vitiating to masculinity, if the male citizen took the active and not the receptive role. [[Hypersexuality]], however, was condemned morally and medically in both men and women. Women were held to a stricter moral code,<ref name=n299>[[#Nussbaum|Nussbaum]], pp. 299–300</ref> and same-sex relations between women are poorly documented, but the sexuality of women is variously celebrated or reviled throughout Latin literature. In general the Romans had more fluid gender boundaries than the [[ancient Greeks]].<ref name=h11>[[#Hallett|Hallett]], p. 11.</ref>

A late-20th-century paradigm analyzed Roman sexuality in relation to a "penetrator–penetrated" [[Binary opposition|binary model]]. This model, however, has limitations, especially in regard to expressions of sexuality among individual Romans.<ref name="langlands">[[#Langlands|Langlands]], p. 13.</ref> Even the relevance of the word "[[human sexuality|sexuality]]" to ancient Roman culture has been disputed;<ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], p. 8, maintains that the ancient Romans "did not have a self-conscious idea of their sexuality".</ref><ref>[[#Penner|Penner]], pp. 15–16</ref><ref>[[#Habinek|Habinek]], pp. 2ff.</ref> but in the absence of any other label for "the cultural interpretation of erotic experience", the term continues to be used.<ref>[[#Edwards|Edwards]], pp. 66–67, especially note 12.</ref>

==Erotic literature and art==
{{See also|Erotic art in Pompeii and Herculaneum}}
[[File:Roman mosaic- Love Scene - Centocelle - Rome - KHM - Vienna.jpg|thumb|Romantic scene from a mosaic ''(Villa at Centocelle, Rome, 20&nbsp;BC–20&nbsp;AD)'']]

Ancient literature pertaining to Roman sexuality falls mainly into four categories: legal texts; medical texts; poetry; and political discourse.<ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], p. 9.</ref> Forms of expression with lower cultural [[wikt:cachet|cachet]] in antiquity—such as [[Roman comedy|comedy]], [[Roman satire|satire]], [[invective]], love poetry, graffiti, [[Magic in the Greco-Roman world|magic spells]], [[Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum|inscriptions]], and interior decoration—have more to say about sex than [[high culture|elevated]] genres such as [[epic (genre)|epic]] and [[tragedy]]. Information about the sex lives of the Romans is scattered in [[Roman historiography|historiography]], [[Roman oratory|oratory]], philosophy, and writings on [[ancient Roman medicine|medicine]], [[Roman agriculture|agriculture]], and other technical topics.<ref>[[#Potter2009|Potter (2009)]], p. 330.</ref> [[Roman law|Legal texts]] point to behaviors Romans wanted to regulate or prohibit, without necessarily reflecting what people actually did or refrained from doing.<ref>[[#Potter2009|Potter (2009)]], p. 331.</ref>

Major Latin authors whose works contribute significantly to an understanding of Roman sexuality include:

* the comic playwright [[Plautus]] (d. 184&nbsp;BC), whose plots often revolve around [[sex comedy]] and young lovers kept apart by circumstances;
* the statesman and moralist [[Cato the Elder]] (d. 149&nbsp;BC), who offers glimpses of sexuality at a time that later Romans regarded as having higher moral standards;
* the poet [[Lucretius]] (d.&nbsp;c. 55&nbsp;BC), who presents an extended treatment of [[#Epicurean sexuality|Epicurean sexuality]] in his philosophical work ''[[De rerum natura]]'';
* [[Catullus]] (''[[floruit|fl.]]'' 50s&nbsp;BC), whose poems explore a range of erotic experience near the end of the [[Roman Republic|Republic]], from delicate romanticism to brutally obscene invective;
* [[Cicero]] (d. 43&nbsp;BC), with courtroom speeches that often attack the opposition's sexual conduct and letters peppered with gossip about Rome's elite;
* the [[Augustan literature (ancient Rome)|Augustan elegists]] [[Propertius]] and [[Tibullus]], who reveal social attitudes in describing love affairs with mistresses;
* [[Ovid]] (d. 17&nbsp;AD), especially his ''[[Amores (Ovid)|Amores]]'' ("Love Affairs") and ''[[Ars Amatoria]]'' ("Art of Love"), which according to tradition contributed to [[Augustus]]'s decision to exile the poet, and his epic, the ''[[Metamorphoses]]'', which presents a range of sexuality, with an emphasis on rape, through the lens of [[classical mythology|mythology]];
* the [[epigram]]matist [[Martial]] (d.&nbsp;c. 102/4&nbsp;AD), whose observations of society are braced by sexually explicit invective;
* the satirist [[Juvenal]] (d. early 2nd century AD), who rails against the [[sexual mores]] of his time.

{{multiple image
 | direction = vertical
   | align = right
  | width     = 250
 | image_style = border:none;
 | image1    = Clarke Ars Erotica 04.jpg
   | alt1      = 
   | caption1  = Erotic art in its architectural context at the [[House of the Centenary]], Pompeii
   | image2    = Pompeii - Casa del Centenario - Cubiculum 2.jpg
   | alt2      = 
   | caption2  = Detail of the painting
   | footer    = 
   }}
Ovid lists a number of writers known for salacious material whose works are now lost.<ref>Ovid, ''[[Tristia]]'' 2.431ff.</ref> Greek sex manuals and "straightforward pornography"<ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.2307/299915 |jstor=299915 |title=Propertius and Antony |journal=Journal of Roman Studies |volume=67 |pages=17–26 (20) |year=2012 |last1=Griffin |first1=Jasper }}</ref> were published under the name of famous ''[[hetaera|heterai]]'' (courtesans), and circulated in Rome. The robustly sexual [[Milesian tale|''Milesiaca'' of Aristides]] was translated by [[Lucius Cornelius Sisenna|Sisenna]], one of the [[praetor]]s of 78&nbsp;BC. Ovid calls the book a collection of misdeeds ''(crimina)'', and says the narrative was laced with dirty jokes.<ref>Ovid, ''Tristia'' 2.413 and 443–444; Heinz Hofmann, ''Latin Fiction: The Latin Novel in Context'' (Routledge, 1999), p. 85.</ref> After the [[Battle of Carrhae]], the [[Parthian Empire|Parthians]] were reportedly shocked to find the ''Milesiaca'' in the baggage of [[Marcus Crassus]]'s officers.<ref>[[Plutarch]], ''Life of Crassus'' 32.</ref>

[[Erotic art in Pompeii and Herculaneum|Erotic art, especially as preserved in Pompeii and Herculaneum]], is a rich if not unambiguous source; some images contradict sexual preferences stressed in literary sources and may be intended to provoke laughter or challenge conventional attitudes.<ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], p. 3.</ref> Everyday objects such as mirrors and serving vessels might be decorated with erotic scenes; on [[Arretine ware]], these range from "elegant amorous dalliance" to explicit views of the penis entering the vagina.<ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], p. 108.</ref> Erotic paintings were found in the most respectable houses of the [[nobiles|Roman nobility]], as Ovid notes:

<blockquote>
Just as venerable figures of men, painted by the hand of an artist, are resplendent in our houses, so too there is a small painting ''(tabella)''<ref group="n">The ''tabella'' was a small, portable painting, as distinguished from an architecturally permanent wall painting.</ref> in some spot which depicts [[#Sex acts and positions|various couplings and sexual positions]]: just as [[Telamonian Ajax]] sits with an expression that declares his anger, and the barbarian mother ([[Medea]]) has crime in her eyes, so too a wet Venus dries her dripping hair with her fingers and is viewed barely covered by the maternal waters.<ref>Ovid, ''Tristia'' 2, as cited in [[#Clarke|Clarke]], pp. 91–92.</ref>
</blockquote>

The pornographic ''tabella'' and the erotically charged Venus appear among various images that a connoisseur of art might enjoy.<ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], p. 93.</ref> A series of paintings from the [[Suburban Baths (Pompeii)|Suburban Baths]] at [[Pompeii]], discovered in 1986 and published in 1995, presents erotic scenarios that seem intended "to amuse the viewer with outrageous sexual spectacle," including a [[#Sex acts and positions|variety of positions]], [[#Os impurum|oral sex]], and [[#Group sex|group sex]] featuring male–female, male–male, and female–female relations.<ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], pp. 3 and 212 ff., quotation on p. 216.</ref>

The décor of a Roman bedroom could reflect quite literally its sexual use: the Augustan poet [[Horace]] supposedly had a mirrored room for sex, so that when he hired a prostitute he could watch from all angles.<ref>As criticized by [[Suetonius]], ''Life of Horace'': ''Ad res Venerias intemperantior traditur; nam speculato cubiculo scorta dicitur habuisse disposita, ut quocumque respexisset ibi ei imago coitus referretur''; [[#Clarke|Clarke]], p. 92.</ref> The emperor [[Tiberius]] had his bedrooms decorated with "the most lascivious" paintings and sculptures, and stocked with Greek sex manuals by [[Elephantis]] in case those employed in sex needed direction.<ref name="lovemaking92">Suetonius, ''Life of Tiberius'' 44.2; [[#Clarke|Clarke]], pp. 92–93.</ref>

In the 2nd century AD, "there is a boom in texts about sex in Greek and Latin," along with [[ancient Greek novel|romance novels]].<ref name="sexuality329">[[#Potter2009|Potter (2009)]], p. 329.</ref> But frank sexuality all but disappears from literature thereafter, and sexual topics are reserved for medical writing or Christian theology. In the 3rd century, [[celibacy]] had become an ideal among the growing number of Christians, and [[Church Fathers]] such as [[Tertullian]] and [[Clement of Alexandria]] debated whether even [[Religion and sexuality#Christianity|marital sex]] should be permitted for procreation. The sexuality of [[martyrology]] focuses on tests against the Christian's chastity<ref name="sexuality329"/> and sexual torture; Christian women are more often than men subjected to sexual mutilation, in particular of the breasts.<ref group="n">For example, [[Agatha of Sicily]] and [[Febronia of Nisibis]]; Sebastian P. Brock and Susan Ashbrook Harvey, introduction to ''Holy Women of the Syrian Orient'' (University of California Press, 1987), pp. 24–25; Harvey, "Women in Early Byzantine Hagiography: Reversing the Story," in ''That Gentle Strength: Historical Perspectives on Women in Christianity'' (University Press of Virginia, 1990), pp. 48–50. The accounts of breast mutilation occur in Christian sources and iconography, not in Roman art and literature.</ref> The obscene humor of Martial was briefly revived in [[Gallia Aquitania|4th-century Bordeaux]] by the [[Roman Gaul|Gallo-Roman]] scholar-poet [[Ausonius]], although he shunned Martial's predilection for pederasty and was at least nominally a Christian.<ref name="sexuality330">[[#Potter2009|Potter (2009)]], p. 330. Although there is little question that Ausonius was a Christian, his works contain many indications that he remained at least interested in, if not a practitioner of, traditional Roman and Celtic religions.</ref>

==Sex, religion, and the state==
[[File:Pompeii - Villa dei Misteri - Room 4.jpg|thumb|A man prepares the nocturnal sacrifice of a pig to [[Priapus]], with [[Cupid]] as the swineherd<ref>Anthony King, "Mammals," in ''The Natural History of Pompeii'' (Cambridge University Press, 2002), p. 444; John R. Clarke, ''The Houses of Roman Italy, 100&nbsp;B.C.–A.D. 250: Ritual, Space and Decoration'' (University of California Press, 1991), p. 97.</ref> ''(wall painting, [[Villa of the Mysteries]])'']]

Like other aspects of Roman life, sexuality was supported and regulated by [[Religion in ancient Rome|religious traditions]], both the public cult of the state and private religious practices and magic. Sexuality was an important category of Roman religious thought.<ref>[[#Staples|Staples]]</ref> The complement of male and female was vital to the [[List of Roman deities|Roman concept of deity]]. The ''[[Dii Consentes]]'' were a council of deities in male–female pairs, to some extent Rome's equivalent to the [[Twelve Olympians]] of the Greeks.<ref>Celia E. Schultz, ''Women's Religious Activity in the Roman Republic'' (University of North Carolina Press, 2006), pp. 79–81; Michael Lipka, ''Roman Gods: A Conceptual Approach'' (Brill, 2009), pp. 141–142</ref> At least two state priesthoods were held jointly by a married couple.<ref group="n">See [[Flamen Dialis]] and ''[[rex sacrorum]]''.</ref> The [[Vestal Virgins]], the one state priesthood reserved for women, took a vow of chastity that granted them relative independence from male control; among the religious objects in their keeping was a sacred [[phallus]]:<ref>[[Mary Beard (classicist)|Mary Beard]], J.A. North, and S.R.F. Price, ''Religions of Rome: A History'' (Cambridge University Press, 1998), vol. 1, p. 53; Robin Lorsch Wildfang, ''Rome's Vestal Virgins: A Study of Rome's Vestal Priestesses in the Late Republic and Early Empire'' (Routledge, 2006), p. 20.</ref> "[[Vesta (mythology)|Vesta]]'s fire ... evoked the idea of sexual purity in the female" and "represented the procreative power of the male".<ref>[[#Staples|Staples]], p. 149.</ref> The men who served in the various [[Collegium (ancient Rome)|colleges]] of [[College of Pontiffs|priests]] were expected to marry and have families. [[Cicero]] held that the desire ''([[libido]])'' to procreate was "the seedbed of the republic", as it was the cause for the first form of social institution, [[Marriage in ancient Rome|marriage]]. Marriage produced children and in turn a "house" ''([[domus]])'' for family unity that was the building block of urban life.<ref>[[Cicero]], ''[[De officiis]]'' 1.17.54: ''nam cum sit hoc natura commune animantium, ut habeant libidinem procreandi, prima societas in ipso coniugio est, proxima in liberis, deinde una domus, communia omnia; id autem est principium urbis et quasi seminarium reipublicae''; Sabine MacCormack, "Sin, Citizenship, and the Salvation of Souls: The Impact of Christian Priorities on Late-Roman and Post-Roman Society," ''Comparative Studies in Society and History'' 39.4 (1997), p. 651.</ref>

Many [[Roman festival|Roman religious festivals]] had an element of sexuality. The February [[Lupercalia]], celebrated as late as the 5th century of the [[Christian era]], included an archaic fertility rite. The [[Floralia]] featured nude dancing. At certain religious festivals throughout April, [[Prostitution in ancient Rome#Prostitution and religion|prostitutes participated]] or were officially recognized. Cupid inspired desire; the imported god [[Priapus]] represented gross or humorous lust; [[Mutunus Tutunus]] promoted [[#Marital sex|marital sex]]. The god [[Liber]] (understood as the "Free One") oversaw physiological responses during sexual intercourse. When a male assumed the ''[[toga virilis]]'', "toga of manhood," Liber became his [[Patronage in ancient Rome|patron]]; according to the love poets, he left behind the innocent modesty ''(pudor)'' of childhood and acquired the sexual freedom ''(libertas)'' to begin his course of love.<ref>''Iter amoris'', "journey" or "course of love". See [[Propertius]] 3.15.3–6; [[Ovid]], ''[[Fasti (poem)|Fasti]]'' 3.777–778; Michelle George, "The 'Dark Side' of the Toga," in ''Roman Dress and the Fabrics of Roman Culture'' (University of Toronto Press, 2008), p. 55. [[Robert E.&nbsp;A. Palmer]], "Mutinus Titinus: A Study in Etrusco-Roman Religion and Topography," in ''Roman Religion and Roman Empire: Five Essays'' (University of Pennsylvania Press, 1974), pp. 187–206, argued that Mutunus Tutunus was subsumed by the cult of Liber; [[Augustine]], ''De civitate Dei'' 7.21, said that a phallus was a divine object used during the Liberalia to repel malevolent influences from the crops.</ref> A host of [[List of Roman birth and childhood deities|deities]] oversaw every aspect of intercourse, conception, and childbirth.<ref>Robert Turcan, ''The Gods of Ancient Rome'' (Routledge, 2001; originally published in French 1998), pp. 18–20; [[Jörg Rüpke]], ''Religion in Republican Rome: Rationalization and Ritual Change'' (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2002), pp. 181–182.</ref>

[[File:Sulla Coin.jpg|thumb|Denarius issued ''ca.'' 84–83&nbsp;BC under [[Sulla]] picturing Venus with a [[diadem]] and a standing Cupid with a palm branch, and on the reverse two [[Tropaion|military trophies]] and religious implements (jug and [[lituus]])]]
The connections among human reproduction, general prosperity, and the wellbeing of the state are embodied by the Roman [[Cult (religious practice)|cult]] of [[Venus (mythology)|Venus]], who differs from her Greek counterpart [[Aphrodite]] in her role as a mother of the Roman people through her half-mortal son [[Aeneas]].<ref>As in the first-line invocation of Venus in [[Lucretius]]'s epic ''[[De rerum natura]]'': "Begetter ''(genetrix)'' of the line of Aeneas, the pleasure ''(voluptas)'' of human and divine."</ref> The ''[[fascinum]]'', a phallic charm, was ubiquitous in Roman culture, appearing on everything from jewelry to bells and [[wind chime]]s to lamps,<ref>[[#Williams|Williams]], p. 92.</ref> including as an [[amulet]] to protect children<ref>Martin Henig, ''Religion in Roman Britain'' (London: Batsford, 1984), pp. 185–186.</ref> and [[Roman triumph|triumphing generals]].<ref>[[Pliny the Elder|Pliny]], ''Natural History'' 28.4.7 (28.39), says that when a general celebrated a triumph, the Vestals hung an effigy of the ''fascinus'' on the underside of his [[chariot]] to protect him from ''[[invidia]]''.</ref>

[[Classical mythology|Classical myths]] often deal with sexual themes such as [[gender identity]], [[adultery]], [[incest]], and [[rape]]. Roman art and literature continued the [[Alexandrian school|Hellenistic]] treatment of [[List of Greek mythological figures|mythological figures]] having sex as humanly erotic and at times humorous, often removed from the religious dimension.<ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], pp. 46–47.</ref>

===Moral and legal concepts===

====''Castitas''====
[[File:Fregio storico della basilica emilia, I secolo a.c., punizione di tarpea.JPG|thumb|right|Fragmentary [[Augustus|Augustan]]-era relief depicting the punishment of [[Tarpeia]], a Vestal who in Roman legend broke her vows and betrayed her country by consorting with the enemy]]

The Latin word ''castitas'', from which the English "[[chastity]]" derives, is an [[abstract noun]] denoting "a moral and physical purity usually in a specifically religious context", sometimes but not always referring to sexual chastity.<ref name="langlands1">[[#Langlands|Langlands]], p. 30.</ref> The related adjective ''[[Glossary of ancient Roman religion#castus, castitas|castus]]'' ([[grammatical gender|feminine]] ''casta'', neuter ''castum''), "pure", can be used of places and objects as well as people; the adjective ''pudicus'' ("chaste, modest") describes more specifically a person who is sexually moral.<ref name="langlands1"/> The [[goddess Ceres]] was concerned with both ritual and sexual ''castitas'', and the torch carried in her honor as part of the Roman wedding procession was associated with the bride's purity; Ceres also embodied motherhood.<ref>[[Barbette Stanley Spaeth]], ''The Roman Goddess Ceres'' (University of Texas Press, 1996), pp. 115–116, citing [[Sextus Pompeius Festus|Festus]] (87 in the edition of Müller) on the torch and noting that priestesses devoted to Ceres in [[Africa (Roman province)|North Africa]] took a vow of chastity like that of the Vestals ([[Tertullian]], ''Ad uxorem'' 1.6 Oehler). [[Ovid]] notes that Ceres is pleased by even small offerings, as long as they are ''casta'' (''[[Fasti (Ovid)|Fasti]]'' 4.411–412). [[Statius]] says that Ceres herself is ''casta'' (''[[Silvae]]'' 4.311). The goddess's concern with ''castitas'' may have to do with her tutelary function over boundaries, including the transition between life and death, as in the [[mystery religions]].</ref> The [[goddess Vesta]] was the primary [[List of Roman deities|deity of the Roman pantheon]] associated with ''castitas'', and a virgin goddess herself; her priestesses the Vestals were virgins who took a vow to remain celibate.

====''Incestum''====
[[File:Vestal Palatino Inv12491.jpg|thumb|Vestal from the time of [[Hadrian]], fragment of a marble relief from the [[Palatine Hill|Palatine]], Rome]]

''Incestum'' (that which is "not ''castum''") is an act that violates religious purity,<ref name="langlands1"/> perhaps synonymous with that which is ''[[nefas]]'', religiously impermissible.<ref>H.H.J. Brouwer,'' Bona Dea: The Sources and a Description of the Cult'' (Brill, 1989), pp. 367–367, note 319.</ref> The violation of a Vestal's vow of chastity was ''incestum'', a legal charge brought against her and the man who rendered her impure through sexual relations, whether consensually or by force. A Vestal's loss of ''castitas'' ruptured Rome's treaty with the gods ''([[pax deorum]])'',<ref>Mueller, ''Roman Religion in Valerius Maximus'', p. 51; Susanne William Rasmussen, ''Public Portents in Republican Rome'' («L'Erma» di Bretschneider, 2003), p. 41.</ref> and was typically accompanied by the observation of bad omens ''([[Glossary of ancient Roman religion#prodigium|prodigia]])''. Prosecutions for ''incestum'' involving a Vestal often coincided with political unrest, and some charges of ''incestum'' seem politically motivated;<ref>Wildfang, ''Rome's Vestal Virgins'', p. 82 ''et passim''.</ref> for example, [[Marcus Crassus]] was acquitted of ''incestum'' with a Vestal who shared his family name.<ref group="n">Crassus's ''[[nomen gentilicium|nomen]]'' was [[Licinia gens|Licinius]]; the Vestal's name was Licinia (see [[Roman naming conventions]]). His reputation for greed and sharp business dealings helped save him; he objected that he had spent time with Licinia to obtain some real estate she owned. For sources, see Michael C. Alexander, ''Trials in the Late Roman Republic, 149&nbsp;BC to 50&nbsp;BC'' (University of Toronto Press, 1990), p. 84. The most likely year was 73&nbsp;BC; Plutarch, ''Life of Crassus'' [https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Plutarch/Lives/Crassus*.html#1.2 1.2] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200410020040/http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Plutarch/Lives/Crassus*.html#1.2 |date=2020-04-10 }}, implies that the prosecution was motivated by political utility. One or more Vestals were also brought before the [[College of Pontiffs]] for ''incestum'' in connection with the [[Catiline Conspiracy]] (Alexander, ''Trials'', p. 83).</ref> In 114 BC [[Trial of the Vestal Virgins (114–113 BC)|three Vestals were convicted]] for having sex with several men of the governing class, in the wake of which a temple to [[Venus Verticordia]] was founded.

Although the English word "[[incest]]" derives from the Latin, incestuous relations are only one form of Roman ''incestum'',<ref name="langlands1"/> sometimes translated as "[[sacrilege]]". When [[Publius Clodius Pulcher|Clodius Pulcher]] dressed as a woman and intruded on the all-female rites of the [[Bona Dea]], he was charged with ''incestum''.<ref>The sources on this notorious incident are numerous; Brouwer, ''Bona Dea'', p. 144ff., gathers the ancient accounts.</ref>

====''Stuprum''====
In [[Roman law|Latin legal]] and moral discourse, ''stuprum'' is illicit sexual intercourse, translatable as "criminal debauchery"<ref>Bruce W. Frier and Thomas A.&nbsp;J. McGinn, ''A Casebook on Roman Family Law'' (Oxford University Press, 2004), pp. 38 and 52.</ref> or "[[sex crime]]".<ref>[[#Richlin1983|Richlin (1983)]], p. 30.</ref> ''Stuprum'' encompasses diverse sexual offenses including ''incestum'', rape ("unlawful sex by force"),<ref>''Stuprum cum vi'' or ''per vim stuprum'': [[#Richlin1993|Richlin (1993)]], p. 562.</ref> and [[Marriage in ancient Rome#Adultery|adultery]]. In early Rome, ''stuprum'' was a disgraceful act in general, or any public disgrace, including but not limited to illicit sex.<ref group="n">For instance, in the mid-3rd century BC, [[Gnaeus Naevius|Naevius]] uses the word ''stuprum'' in his ''Bellum Punicum'' for the military disgrace of desertion or cowardice; [[#Fantham|Fantham]], p. 117.</ref> By the time of the [[Roman comedy|comic playwright]] [[Plautus]] (''ca.'' 254–184&nbsp;BC) it had acquired its more restricted sexual meaning.<ref name="attitudes118">[[#Fantham|Fantham]], p. 118.</ref> ''Stuprum'' can occur only among citizens; protection from sexual misconduct was among the legal rights that distinguished the citizen from the non-citizen.<ref name="attitudes118"/> Although the noun ''stuprum'' may be translated into English as [[fornication]], the [[intransitive verb]] "to fornicate" is an inadequate translation of the Latin ''stuprare'', which is a [[transitive verb]] requiring a [[direct object]] (the person who is the target of the misconduct) and a male agent (the ''stuprator'').<ref name="attitudes118"/>

====''Raptus''====
The English word "[[rape]]" derives ultimately from the Latin verb ''rapio, rapere, raptus'', "to snatch, carry away, abduct" (cf. English ''rapt'', ''rapture'', and ''raptor''). In Roman law, ''raptus'' or ''raptio'' meant primarily kidnapping or abduction;<ref>Diana C. Moses, "Livy's Lucretia and the Validity of Coerced Consent in Roman Law," in ''Consent and Coercion to Sex and Marriage in Ancient and Medieval Societies'' (Dunbarton Oaks, 1993), p. 50; Gillian Clark, ''Women in Late Antiquity: Pagan and Christian Life-styles'' (Oxford University Press, 1993), p. 36.</ref> the mythological [[rape of the Sabine women]] is a form of [[bride abduction]] in which sexual violation is a secondary issue. The "abduction" of an unmarried girl from her father's household at times might be a matter of the couple eloping without her father's permission to marry. Rape in the English sense was more often expressed as ''stuprum'' committed through violence or coercion (''cum vi'' or ''per vim''). As laws pertaining to violence were codified toward the end of the Republic, ''raptus ad stuprum'', "abduction for the purpose of committing a sex crime", emerged as a legal distinction.<ref>Moses, "Livy's Lucretia," pp. 50–51.</ref> (See further discussion of rape under [[#The rape of men|"The rape of men"]] and [[#Rape|"Rape and the law"]] below.)

===Healing and magic===
[[File:Museo Nazionale Napoli Gabinetto Segreto Findings From Pompeji.jpg|thumb|Votive offerings from Pompeii representing breasts, penises, and a uterus]]
Divine aid might be sought in private religious rituals along with medical treatments to enhance or block fertility, or to cure diseases of the reproductive organs. [[Votive offerings]] ''([[votum|vota]]''; compare [[ex-voto]]) in the form of breasts and penises have been found at healing sanctuaries.

A private ritual under some circumstances might be considered "magic", an indistinct category in antiquity.<ref>[[Hans Dieter Betz]], ''The Greek Magical Papyri in Translation'' (University of Chicago Press, 1986, 1992), p. xliff.</ref> An ''amatorium'' (Greek ''philtron'') was a love charm or potion;<ref>Matthew W. Dickie, ''Magic and Magicians in the Greco-Roman World'' (Routledge, 2003), p. 16.</ref> binding spells ''(defixiones)'' were supposed to "fix" a person's sexual affection.<ref>Dickie, ''Magic and Magicians'', p. 36. ''Defixiones'' are also known as [[curse tablets]]; erotic prohibitions are only one form of ''defixio''.</ref> The [[Greek Magical Papyri]], a collection of [[Magic in the Greco-Roman world|syncretic magic]] texts, contain many love spells that indicate "there was a very lively market in erotic magic in the Roman period", catered by freelance priests who at times claimed to derive their authority from the [[Ancient Egyptian religion|Egyptian religious tradition]].<ref>Richard Gordon, "Innovation and Authority in Graeco-Egyptian Magic," in ''Kykeon: Studies in Honour of H.&nbsp;S. Versnel'' (Brill, 2002), p. 72.</ref> Canidia, a witch described by Horace, performs a spell using a female effigy to dominate a smaller male doll.<ref>Christopher A. Faraone, "Agents and Victims: Constructions of Gender and Desire in Ancient Greek Love Magic," in ''The Sleep of Reason'', p. 410.</ref>

[[Aphrodisiac]]s, [[anaphrodisiac]]s, [[Birth control#History|contraceptives]], and [[abortifacient]]s are preserved by both medical handbooks and magic texts; potions can be difficult to distinguish from pharmacology. In his Book 33 ''De medicamentis'', [[Marcellus of Bordeaux]], a contemporary of Ausonius,<ref>Marcellus's work was "the last major compilation [of medical treatments] written in Gaul based on the work of ancient and contemporary Greek authors", notes Bonnie Effros, ''Creating Community with Food and Drink in Merovingian Gaul'' (Palgrave Macmillan, 2002), p. 55. Marcellus names the father of Ausonius in his preface.</ref> collected more than 70 sexually related treatments—for growths and lesions on the testicles and penis, [[undescended testicles]], [[erectile dysfunction]], [[hydrocele]], "creating a [[eunuch]] without surgery",<ref>''Ut eunuchum sine ferro facias'', "how you make a eunuch without the iron (blade)": [[Marcellus of Bordeaux]], ''De medicamentis''</ref> ensuring a woman's fidelity, and compelling or diminishing a man's desire—some of which involve ritual procedures:

<blockquote>
If you’ve had a woman, and you don't want another man ever to get inside her, do this: Cut off the tail of a live green lizard with your left hand and release it while it’s still alive. Keep the tail closed up in the palm of the same hand until it dies and touch the woman and her private parts when you have intercourse with her.<ref>Marcellus, ''De medicamentis'' 33.64.</ref>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
There is an herb called ''[[nymphaea]]'' in Greek, 'Hercules’ club' in Latin, and ''baditis'' in [[Gaulish]]. Its root, pounded to a paste and drunk in vinegar for ten consecutive days, turns a boy into a eunuch.<ref>Marcellus, ''De medicamentis'' 33.64; compare [[Pliny the Elder]], ''Natural History'' 25.75 (37).</ref>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
If the [[spermatic veins]] of an immature boy should become enlarged ''([[varicocele]])'', split a young cherry-tree down the middle to its roots while leaving it standing, in such a way that the boy can be passed through the cleft. Then join the sapling together again and seal it with cow manure and other dressings, so that the parts that were split may intermingle within themselves more easily. The speed with which the sapling grows together and its scar forms will determine how quickly the swollen veins of the boy will return to health.<ref>Marcellus, ''De medicamentis'' 33.26.</ref>
</blockquote>

Marcellus also records which herbs<ref>Including [[Artemisia (plant)|artemisia]], [[Origanum dictamnus|dittany]], [[Opopanax (genus)|opopanax]], pepper, [[saffron]], [[giant fennel]], [[myrrh]], and [[colocynth]]; [[John M. Riddle]], ''Contraception and Abortion from the Ancient World to the Renaissance'' (Harvard University Press, 1992), p. 90.</ref> could be used to induce [[menstruation]], or to purge the womb after childbirth or abortion; these herbs include potential abortifacients and may have been used as such.<ref>Riddle, ''Contraception and Abortion from the Ancient World to the Renaissance'', p. 91, noting that Marcellus "does not appear expertly knowledgeable about...women and fertility".</ref> Other sources advise remedies such as coating the penis with a mixture of honey and pepper to get an erection,<ref>The ''Paignia'' of Democritus, [[Greek Magical Papyri|PGM]] 7.167–186, as cited by James N. Davidson, "Don't Try This at Home: Pliny's Salpe, Salpe's ''Paignia'' and Magic," ''Classical Quarterly'' 45.2 (1995), p. 591.</ref> or boiling an ass' genitals in oil as an ointment.<ref>Pliny, ''Natural History'' 28.262, crediting Salpe the obstetrician, as cited by Davidson, "Don't Try This at Home," p. 591.</ref>

==Theories of sexuality==
Ancient theories of sexuality were produced by and for an educated elite. The extent to which theorizing about sex actually affected behavior is debatable, even among those who were attentive to the philosophical and medical writings that presented such views. This elite discourse, while often deliberately critical of common or typical behaviors, at the same time cannot be assumed to exclude values broadly held within the society.

===Epicurean sexuality===
{{quote box|bgcolor=#FFFFF0|width=30%|align=right|salign=right
|quote="Nor does he who avoids love lack the fruit of Venus but rather chooses goods which are without a penalty; for certainly the pleasure from this is more pure for the healthy than for the wretched. For indeed, at the very moment of possession, the hot passion of lovers fluctuates with uncertain wanderings and they are undecided what to enjoy first with eyes and hands. They tightly press what they have sought and cause bodily pain, and often drive their teeth into little lips and give crushing kisses, because the pleasure is not pure and there are goads underneath which prod them to hurt that very thing, whatever it is, from which those [torments] of frenzy spring."<ref>Translation from [[#Brown|Brown]], p. 151, of Lucretius, ''De rerum natura'', 4.1073–1085:<br />''Nec Veneris fructu caret is qui vitat amorem,<br />sed potius quae sunt sine poena commoda sumit;<br />nam certe purast sanis magis inde voluptas<br />quam miseris. etenim potiundi tempore in ipso<br />fluctuat incertis erroribus ardor amantum<br />nec constat quid primum oculis manibusque fruantur.<br />quod petiere, premunt arte faciuntque dolorem<br />corporis et dentes inlidunt saepe labellis<br />osculaque adfligunt, quia non est pura voluptas<br />et stimuli subsunt qui instigant laedere id ipsum<br />quodcumque est, rabies unde illaec germina surgunt.''</ref>
|source=[[Lucretius]], ''De rerum natura'' 4.1073–1085
}}

The fourth book of [[Lucretius]]' ''[[De rerum natura]]'' provides one of the most extended passages on human sexuality in Latin literature. [[Yeats]], describing the translation by [[John Dryden|Dryden]], called it "the finest description of sexual intercourse ever written."<ref>Stuart Gillespie and Philip Hardie, introduction to ''The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius'' (Cambridge University Press, 2007), p. 12.</ref> Lucretius was the contemporary of [[Catullus]] and [[Cicero]] in the mid-1st century BC. His [[didactic poetry|didactic poem]] ''De rerum natura'' is a presentation of [[Epicureanism|Epicurean philosophy]] within the [[Ennius|Ennian epic]] tradition of Latin poetry. Epicureanism is both [[materialism|materialist]] and [[hedonic]]. The [[value (ethics)|highest good]] is pleasure, defined as the absence of physical pain and emotional distress.<ref>[[Epicurus]], ''Letter to Menoeceus'' 131.</ref> The Epicurean seeks to gratify his desires with the least expenditure of passion and effort. Desires are ranked as those that are both natural and necessary, such as hunger and thirst; those that are natural but unnecessary, such as sex; and those that are neither natural nor necessary, including the desire to rule over others and glorify oneself.<ref>A [[scholiast]] gives an example of an unnatural and unnecessary desire as acquiring crowns and setting up statues for oneself; see J.M. Rist, ''Epicurus: An Introduction'' (Cambridge University Press, 1972), pp. 116–119.</ref> It is within this context that Lucretius presents his analysis of love and sexual desire, which counters the erotic ethos of Catullus and influenced the [[Augustan literature (ancient Rome)|love poets of the Augustan period]].<ref>Philip Hardie, "Lucretius and Later Latin Literature in Antiquity," in ''The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius'', p. 121, note 32.</ref>

Lucretius treats male desire, female sexual pleasure, heredity, and infertility as aspects of sexual physiology. In the Epicurean view, sexuality arises from impersonal physical causes without divine or supernatural influence. The onset of physical maturity generates semen, and [[wet dreams]] occur as the sexual instinct develops.<ref>Lucretius, ''De rerum natura'', 4.1030–57</ref><ref>[[#Brown|Brown]], pp. 62–63.</ref> Sense perception, specifically the sight of a beautiful body, provokes the movement of semen into the genitals and toward the object of desire. The engorgement of the genitals creates an urge to ejaculate, coupled with the anticipation of pleasure. The body's response to physical attractiveness is automatic, and neither the character of the person desired nor one's own choice is a factor. With a combination of scientific detachment and ironic humor, Lucretius treats the human sex drive as ''muta cupido'', "dumb desire", comparing the physiological response of ejaculation to the blood spurting from a wound.<ref>[[#Brown|Brown]], pp. 63, 181–182.</ref> Love ''(amor)'' is merely an elaborate cultural posturing that obscures a glandular condition;<ref>[[#Brown|Brown]], p. 64.</ref> love taints sexual pleasure just as life is tainted by the fear of death.<ref>[[#Brown|Brown]], p. 65. Epicurus taught that the soul was a thin tissue of atoms that dissipated into the cosmos upon death; therefore, there is no afterlife and no reason for mortals to live with anxieties about what happens after death.</ref> Lucretius is writing primarily for a male audience, and assumes that love is a male passion, directed at either boys or women.<ref>Lucretius, ''De rerum natura'' 4.1053–1054</ref><ref>[[#Brown|Brown]], p. 123.</ref> Male desire is viewed as pathological, frustrating, and violent.<ref name="lucretius65">[[#Brown|Brown]], pp. 65–66.</ref>

Lucretius thus expresses an Epicurean ambivalence toward sexuality, which threatens one's peace of mind with agitation if desire becomes a form of bondage and torment,<ref name="auto">[[#Brown|Brown]], p. 67.</ref> but his view of female sexuality is less negative.<ref name="lucretius65"/> While men are driven by unnatural expectations to engage in onesided and desperate sex, women act on a purely animal instinct toward affection, which leads to mutual satisfaction.<ref name="lucretius66">[[#Brown|Brown]], p. 66.</ref> The comparison with female animals in heat is meant not as an insult, though there are a few traces of conventional misogyny in the work, but to indicate that desire is natural and should not be experienced as torture.<ref name="lucretius66"/>

[[File:Napoli-museomosaico3.jpg|thumb|right|Lucretius recommended the "doggy" position for couples who wanted to conceive (wall painting from Pompeii)]]
Having analyzed the sex act, Lucretius then considers conception and what in modern terms would be called genetics. Both man and woman, he says, produce genital fluids that mingle in a successful procreative act. The characteristics of the child are formed by the relative proportions of the mother's "seed" to the father's. A child who most resembles its mother is born when the female seed dominates the male's, and vice versa; when neither the male nor female seed dominates, the child will have traits of both mother and father evenly. The sex of the child, however, is not determined by the gender of the parent whose traits dominate. Infertility occurs when the two partners fail to make a satisfactory match of their seed after several attempts; the explanation for infertility is physiological and rational, and has nothing to do with the gods.<ref name="auto"/><ref>Lucretius, ''De rerum natura'' 4.1209–1277</ref> The transfer of genital "seed" ''(semina)'' is consonant with Epicurean [[History of physics#Ancient history|physics]] and the theme of the work as a whole: the invisible ''semina rerum'', "seeds of things," continually dissolve and recombine in universal flux.<ref>[[#Brown|Brown]], p. 69.</ref> The vocabulary of biological procreation thus underlies Lucretius' presentation of how matter is formed from atoms.<ref>[[David Sedley]], ''Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom'' (Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 195–196.</ref>

Lucretius' purpose is to correct ignorance and to give the knowledge necessary for managing one's sex life rationally.<ref name="lucretius68">[[#Brown|Brown]], p. 68.</ref> He distinguishes between pleasure and conception as goals of copulation; both are legitimate, but require different approaches.<ref name="lucretius68"/> He recommends casual sex as a way of releasing sexual tension without becoming obsessed with a single object of desire;<ref>Lucretius, ''De rerum natura'' 4.1144ff.</ref><ref>[[#Brown|Brown]], p. 193.</ref> a "streetwalking Venus"—a common prostitute—should be used as a surrogate.<ref>Phebe Lowell Bowditch, ''Horace and the Gifty Economy of Patronage'' (University of California Press, 2001), p. 215.</ref> Sex without passionate attachment produces a superior form of pleasure free of uncertainty, frenzy, and mental disturbance.<ref>Lucretius, ''De rerum natura'' 4.1076ff.</ref><ref>[[#Brown|Brown]], p. 217.</ref> Lucretius calls this form of sexual pleasure ''venus'', in contrast to ''amor'', passionate love.<ref>Lucretius, ''De rerum natura'' 4.1058, 1073, 1084</ref><ref>[[#Brown|Brown]], p. 227.</ref> The best sex is that of happy animals, or of gods.<ref>[[#Fredrick|Fredrick]], p. 105. The "true" gods as conceived by Epicureans bear little resemblance to those found in mythological literature; they don't concern themselves with mortals, much less have sexual relations with them, and dwell in a state of detachment and ideal pleasure.</ref> Lucretius combines an Epicurean wariness of sex as a threat to peace of mind with the Roman cultural value placed on sexuality as an aspect of marriage and family life,<ref>[[#Brown|Brown]], pp. 69ff.</ref> pictured as an Epicurean man in a tranquil and friendly marriage with a good but homely woman, beauty being a disquieting prompt to excessive desire.<ref>Lucretius, ''De rerum natura'' 4.1278–1287; Gordon, "Some Unseen Monster," p. 105.</ref> Lucretius reacts against the Roman tendency to display sex ostentatiously, as in erotic art, and rejects the aggressive, "[[Priapic]]" model of sexuality spurred by visual stimulus.<ref>Gordon, "Some Unseen Monster," pp. 90–94.</ref>

===Stoic sexual morality===
In early [[Stoicism]] among the [[ancient Greeks|Greeks]], sex was regarded as [[value (ethics)|a good]], if enjoyed between people who maintained the principles of respect and friendship; in the ideal society, sex should be enjoyed freely, without bonds of marriage that treated the partner as property. Some Greek Stoics privileged same-sex relations between a man and a younger male partner<ref name="aurelius16">{{cite book|editor=Richlin, Amy|page=16|title=Marcus Aurelius in Love|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rctbkYo30_MC|date=2008|publisher=University of Chicago Press|isbn=978-0-226-71302-1}}</ref><ref>[[#Colish|Colish]], p. 39, pointing out that to the early Stoics, "sexual needs may therefore be met in whatever manner pleases the individual, including prostitution, incest, masturbation, and homosexuality."</ref> (see "[[Pederasty in ancient Greece]]"). However, Stoics in the [[Roman Empire|Roman Imperial era]] departed from the view of human beings as "communally sexual animals"<ref>[[#Gaca|Gaca]], p. 89. Gaca (p. 60) emphasizes that Seneca and Musonius, while highly influential among the Romans, were "unrepresentative" of the Stoic tradition in general.</ref> and emphasized sex within marriage,<ref name="aurelius16"/> which as an institution helped sustain social order.<ref>William Loader, ''Sexuality and the Jesus Tradition'' (Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2005), p. 186. The relation of Stoic sexual ethics to the formation of Christian sexual ethics is a much-discussed topic of scholarship, but mainstream Christianity regarded celibacy as ideal and sex as inherently sinful, redeemed somewhat if occurring within marriage; see [[#Nussbaum|Nussbaum]], p. 308. See also [[#Colish|Colish]].</ref> Although they distrusted strong passions, including sexual desire,<ref>[[Martha Nussbaum]], ''The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics'' (Princeton University Press, 1994, 2009), pp. 359–401.</ref> sexual vitality was necessary for procreation.

Roman-era Stoics such as [[Seneca the Younger|Seneca]] and [[Musonius Rufus]], both active about 100 years after Lucretius, emphasized "sex unity" over the polarity of the sexes.<ref>[[Prudence Allen]], ''The Concept of Woman: The Aristotelian Revolution, 750&nbsp;BC–AD&nbsp;1250'' (Eden Press, 1985), p. 159.</ref> Although Musonius is predominately a Stoic, his philosophy also partakes of [[Platonism]] and [[Pythagoreanism]].<ref>[[#Nussbaum|Nussbaum]], p. 299. Musonius wrote in Greek under Roman rule; Seneca was a Latin author from [[Roman Spain]].</ref> He rejected the [[Aristotelianism|Aristotelian tradition]], which portrayed [[sexual dimorphism]] as expressing a proper relation of those ruling (male) and those being ruled (female), and distinguished men from [[Aristotle's views on women|women as biologically lacking]]. Dimorphism exists, according to Musonius, simply to create difference, and difference in turn creates the desire for a complementary relationship, that is, a couple who will bond for life for the sake of each other and for their children.<ref name=n299/> The Roman ideal of marriage was a partnership of companions who work together to produce and rear children, manage everyday affairs, lead exemplary lives, and enjoy affection; Musonius drew on this ideal to promote the Stoic view that the capacity for virtue and self-mastery was not gender-specific.<ref>[[#Nussbaum|Nussbaum]], p. 300.</ref>

[[File:Marcus Aurelius Metropolitan Museum.png|thumb|[[Marcus Aurelius]] wrote that sex "is the friction of a piece of gut and, following a sort of convulsion, the expulsion of [[semen|some mucus]]"]]
Both Musonius and Seneca criticized the [[double standard]], cultural and legal, that granted Roman men greater sexual freedom than women.<ref name=n299/><ref>[[#Colish|Colish]], pp. 37–38.</ref> Men, Musonius argues, are excused by society for resorting to prostitutes and slaves to satisfy their sexual appetites, while such behavior from a woman would not be tolerated; therefore, if men presume to exercise authority over women because they believe themselves to have greater self-control, they ought to be able to manage their sex drive. The argument, then, is not that sexual freedom is a human good, but that men as well as women should exercise sexual restraint.<ref name=n299/><ref>Gretchen Reydams-Schils, ''The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility, and Affection'' (University of Chicago Press, 2005), p. 151.</ref> A man visiting a prostitute does harm to himself by lacking self-discipline; disrespect for his wife and her expectations of fidelity would not be an issue.<ref>[[#Nussbaum|Nussbaum]], pp. 307–308.</ref> Similarly, a man should not be so self-indulgent as to exploit a female slave sexually; however, her right not to be used is not a motive for his restraint.<ref>[[#Nussbaum|Nussbaum]], p. 308.</ref> Musonius maintained that even within marriage, sex should be undertaken as an expression of affection and for procreation, and not for "bare pleasure".<ref>"Bare pleasure" is ''psilên hêdonên''; [[#Nussbaum|Nussbaum]], p. 309.</ref>

Musonius disapproved of same-sex relations because they lacked a procreative purpose.<ref name=n299/><ref>Reydams-Schils, ''The Roman Stoics'', p. 152.</ref> Seneca and [[Epictetus]] also thought that procreation privileged male–female sexual pairing within marriage.<ref>[[#Gaca|Gaca]], p. 87.</ref>

Although Seneca is known primarily as a Stoic philosopher, he draws on [[Neopythagoreanism]] for his views on sexual austerity.<ref name="fornication1">[[#Gaca|Gaca]], p. 111.</ref> Neopythagoreans characterized sexuality outside marriage as disordered and undesirable; celibacy was not an ideal, but chastity within marriage was.<ref>Allen, ''The Concept of Woman'', pp. 147–148.</ref> To Seneca, sexual desire for pleasure ''(libido)'' is a "destructive force ''(exitium)'' insidiously fixed in the innards"; unregulated, it becomes ''cupiditas'', lust. The only justification for sex is reproduction within marriage.<ref>[[#Gaca|Gaca]], p. 111, citing ''Ad Helviam'' 13.3: "If one thinks that sexual lust is given to a man not for the purpose of pleasure but for propagating the human race, then all other lust will pass him by unscathed, since the destructive force insidiously fixed in the innards does not violently harm him" ''(si cogitas libidinem non voluptatis causa homini datam, sed propagandi generis, quem no violaverit hoc secretum et infixum visceribus ipsis exitium, omnis alia cupiditas intactum praeteribit)''.</ref> Although other Stoics see potential in beauty to be an ethical stimulus, a way to attract and develop affection and friendship within sexual relations, Seneca distrusts the love of physical beauty as destroying reason to the point of insanity.<ref>[[#Gaca|Gaca]], p. 112, citing Seneca, ''De matrimonio'' 188 (edition of Frassinetti, as excerpted by Jerome, ''[[Against Jovinianus]]'' 319a.</ref> A man should have no sexual partner other than his wife;<ref name="fornication1"/> Seneca strongly opposed adultery, finding it particularly offensive by women.<ref>[[#Gaca|Gaca]], p. 89.</ref> The wise man (''sapiens'', Greek ''sophos'') will make love to his wife by exercising good judgment ''(iudicium)'', not emotion ''(affectus)''.<ref name="fornication">[[#Gaca|Gaca]], p. 112.</ref> This is a far stricter view than that of other Stoics who advocate sex as a means of promoting mutual affection within marriage.<ref name="fornication"/>

The philosophical view of the body as a corpse that carries around the soul<ref>A view of Epictetus as quoted by Marcus Aurelius, 4.41: "You are a little soul carrying a corpse around, as Epictetus used to say."</ref> could result in outright contempt for sexuality: the emperor and Stoic philosopher [[Marcus Aurelius]] writes, "as for sexual intercourse, it is the friction of a piece of gut and, following a sort of convulsion, the expulsion of some mucus".<ref>Marcus Aurelius, ''[[Meditations]]'' 6.13, as translated by Hard<!--sic; make of it what you will--> and cited by Reydams-Schils, ''The Roman Stoics'', p. 36.</ref> Seneca rails "at great length" against the perversity of one [[Hostius Quadra]], who surrounded himself with the equivalent of [[curved mirror|funhouse mirrors]] so he could view [[sex party (group sex)|sex parties]] from distorted angles and penises would look bigger.<ref>Seneca, ''[[Naturales quaestiones|Natural Questions]]'' 1.16, as discussed by Reydams-Schils, ''The Roman Stoics'', p. 112.</ref>

Sexual severity opened the Roman Stoics to charges of hypocrisy: [[Juvenal]] satirizes those who affect a rough and manly Stoic façade but privately indulge.<ref>Juvenal, ''Satire'' 2.8–10, 15–17, as cited by [[#Potter2009|Potter (2009)]], p. 340, with further references to her more in-depth discussions of Juvenal's portrayal in other studies.</ref> It was routinely joked that not only were Stoics inclined toward pederasty, they liked young men who were acquiring beards, contrary to [[Greek love#Ancient Rome|Roman sexual custom]].<ref name="aurelius16"/> [[Martial]] repeatedly makes insinuations about those who were outwardly Stoic but privately enjoyed the passive homosexual role.<ref>[[#Richlin1993|Richlin (1993)]], p. 542, citing Martial 1.24, 1.96, 2.36, 6.56, 7.58, 9.27, and 12.42.</ref>

[[File:Aphrodite Anadyomene from Pompeii cropped.jpg|thumb|upright 1.8|[[Venus Anadyomene|Venus rising from the sea]], a wall painting from Pompeii]]
Stoic sexual ethics are grounded in [[Stoic physics|their physics]] and [[cosmology]].<ref>[[#Gaca|Gaca]], pp. 60, 92.</ref> The 5th-century writer [[Macrobius]] preserves a Stoic interpretation of the myth of the birth of [[Venus (mythology)|Venus]] as a result of the primal castration of the deity Heaven (Latin [[Caelus]]).<ref group="n">"[[Cronus|Kronos]] is the same as [[Chronos|Khronos]]: for as much as the [[mythographer]]s offer different versions of [[Saturn (mythology)|Saturn]] [= Kronos] in their tales, the [[History of physics#Ancient history|physical scientists]] restore him to a certain likeness to the truth. They say that he cut off the genitals of his father, [[Caelus|Heaven]], and that when these were cast into the sea Venus was engendered, taking the name [[Aphrodite]] from the foam [Greek ''aphros''] from which she formed. They interpret this to mean that when [[Chaos (cosmogony)|chaos]] existed, time did not, since time is a fixed measurement computed from the rotation of the heavens. Hence Kronos, who as I said is Khronos, is thought to have been born from heaven itself. Because the seeds for engendering all things ''(semina rerum omnium)'' after heaven flowed down from heaven, and because all the elements that fill the world took their start from those seeds, when the world was complete in all its parts and members, the process of bringing forth seeds from heaven for the creation of the elements came to an end at a fixed moment in time, since a full complement of elements had by then been created. The capacity for engendering living things in an unbroken sequence of reproduction was transferred from water to Venus, so that all things would thenceforth come into being through the intercourse of male and female": Macrobius, ''Saturnalia'' 1.8.6–8, [[Loeb Classical Library]] translation by Robert A. Kaster.</ref> The myth, Macrobius indicates, could be understood as an [[allegory]] of the [[Stoic physics|doctrine of seminal reason]]. The elements derive from the ''semina'', "seeds," that are generated by heaven; "love" brings together the elements in the act of creation, like the sexual union of male and female.<ref>[[#Colish|Colish]], p. 320.</ref> Cicero suggests that in Stoic allegory the severing of reproductive organs signifies "that the highest heavenly aether, that seed-fire which generates all things, did not require the equivalent of human genitals to proceed in its generative work".<ref>Cicero, ''[[De Natura Deorum|On the Nature of the Gods]]'' 2.64. [[Isidore of Seville]] says similarly that Saturn "cut off the genitalia of his father Caelus, because nothing is born in the heavens from seeds" (''Etymologies'' 9.11.32). Jane Chance, ''Medieval Mythography: From Roman North Africa to the School of Chartres, A.D. 433–1177'' (University Press of Florida, 1994), pp. 27 and 142.</ref>
{{Clear}}

==Male sexuality==
[[File:Oil lamp with couple performing Sex at the Römisch-Germanisches Museum Cologne.jpg|thumb|Male–female couple on an [[oil lamp]] ''([[Römisch-Germanisches Museum]])'']]

During the Republic, a Roman citizen's political liberty ''(libertas)'' was defined in part by the right to preserve his body from physical compulsion, including both corporal punishment and sexual abuse.<ref>[[#McGinn1998|McGinn (1998)]], p. 326. See the statement preserved by [[Aulus Gellius]] 9.12. 1 that " it was an injustice to bring force to bear against the body of those who are free" ''(vim in corpus liberum non aecum ... adferri)''.</ref> ''[[Virtus (virtue)|Virtus]]'', "valor" as that which made a man most fully a man ''(vir)'', was among the active virtues.<ref>[[Elaine Fantham]], "The Ambiguity of ''Virtus'' in Lucan's ''Civil War'' and Statius' ''Thebiad''," ''Arachnion'' 3</ref><ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.2307/301365 |jstor=301365 |title=Cicero and the Spectacle of Power |journal=The Journal of Roman Studies |volume=87 |pages=1–22 (9) |year=1997 |last1=Bell |first1=Andrew J. E. }}</ref><ref>Edwin S. Ramage, “Aspects of Propaganda in the ''De bello gallico'': Caesar’s Virtues and Attributes,” ''Athenaeum'' 91 (2003) 331–372; Myles Anthony McDonnell, ''Roman manliness:'' virtus ''and the Roman Republic'' (Cambridge University Press, 2006) ''passim''; Rhiannon Evans, ''Utopia Antiqua: Readings of the Golden Age and Decline at Rome'' (Routledge, 2008), pp. 156–157.</ref> Roman ideals of masculinity were thus premised on taking an active role that was also, as [[#Williams|Williams]] has noted, "the prime directive of masculine sexual behavior for Romans." The impetus toward action might express itself most intensely in an ideal of dominance that reflects the hierarchy of Roman patriarchal society.<ref name="auto1">[[#Williams|Williams]], p. 18.</ref> The "conquest mentality" was part of a "cult of virility" that particularly shaped Roman homosexual practices.<ref>[[#Cantarella|Cantarella]], p. xi</ref><ref name=h11/> In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, an emphasis on domination has led scholars to view expressions of Roman [[male sexuality]] in terms of a "penetrator-penetrated" [[Binary opposition|binary model]]; that is, the proper way for a Roman male to seek sexual gratification was to insert his penis in his partner.<ref name="langlands"/> Allowing himself to be penetrated threatened his liberty as a free citizen as well as his sexual integrity.<ref group="n">See further discussion of how sexual activity defines the free, respectable citizen from the slave or "un-free" person below under [[#Master-slave relations|Master-slave relations]] and [[#Pleasure and infamy|Pleasure and infamy]].</ref>

It was expected and socially acceptable for a freeborn Roman man to want sex with both female and male partners, as long as he took the dominating role.<ref>[[#Richlin1983|Richlin (1983)]], p. 225.</ref> Acceptable objects of desire were women of any social or legal status, male prostitutes, or male slaves, but sexual behaviors outside marriage were to be confined to slaves and prostitutes, or less often a concubine or "kept woman." Lack of self-control, including in managing one's [[sex life]], indicated that a man was incapable of governing others;<ref>[[#Hallett|Hallett]], pp. 67–68.</ref> the enjoyment of "low sensual pleasure" threatened to erode the elite male's identity as a cultured person.<ref name="unspeakable">[[#Hallett|Hallett]], p. 68.</ref> It was a point of pride for [[Gaius Gracchus]] to claim that during his term as a [[Roman governor|provincial governor]] he kept no slave-boys chosen for their good looks, no female prostitutes visited his house, and he never accosted other men's slave-boys.<ref>[[Aulus Gellius]] 15.12.3</ref><ref>[[#Williams|Williams]], pp. 20–21, 39.</ref>

In the Imperial era, anxieties about the loss of political liberty and the subordination of the citizen to the emperor were expressed by a perceived increase in passive homosexual behavior among free men, accompanied by a documentable increase in the execution and corporal punishment of citizens.<ref>[[#Potter2009|Potter (2009)]], p. 329. The law began to specify harsher punishments for the lower classes ''(humiliores)'' than for the elite ''(honestiores)''.</ref> The dissolution of Republican ideals of [[bodily integrity|physical integrity]] in relation to ''libertas'' contributes to and is reflected by the sexual license and decadence associated with the Empire.<ref>This is a theme throughout Carlin A. Barton, ''The Sorrows of the Ancient Romans: The Gladiator and the Monster'' (Princeton University Press, 1993).</ref>

===Male nudity===
[[File:Stele warrior BM GR1905.10-23.1.jpg|thumb|Roman Neo-Attic stele depicting a warrior in a [[muscle cuirass]], idealizing the male form without nudity ''(1st century&nbsp;BC)'']]

The poet [[Ennius]] declared that "exposing naked bodies among citizens is the beginning of public disgrace ''(flagitium)''," a sentiment echoed by Cicero that again links the self-containment of the body with citizenship.<ref>''Flagiti principium est nudare inter civis corpora'': Ennius, as quoted by Cicero, ''[[Tusculan Disputations]]'' 4.33.70</ref><ref>[[#Williams|Williams]], pp. 64 and 292, note 12</ref><ref>[[#Younger|Younger]], p. 134</ref><ref>[[Simon Goldhill]], introduction to ''Being Greek under Rome: Cultural Identity, the Second Sophistic and the Development of Empire'' (Cambridge University Press, 2001), p. 2. Originally, ''flagitium'' meant a [[public humiliation|public shaming]], and later more generally a disgrace; Fritz Graf, "Satire in a Ritual Context," in ''The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire'' (Cambridge University Press, 2005), pp. 195–197.</ref> Roman attitudes toward nudity differed from those of the Greeks, whose ideal of masculine excellence was expressed by the nude male body in art and in such real-life venues as athletic contests. The [[toga]], by contrast, distinguished the body of the sexually privileged adult Roman male.<ref name=":6">[[#Habinek|Habinek]], p. 39.</ref> Even when stripping down for exercises, Roman men kept their genitals and buttocks covered, an [[Italic peoples|Italic]] custom shared also with the [[Etruscans]], whose art mostly shows them wearing a [[loincloth]], a skirt-like garment, or the earliest form of "shorts" for athletics. Romans who competed in the [[Ancient Olympic Games|Olympic Games]] presumably followed the Greek custom of nudity, but athletic nudity at Rome has been dated variously, possibly as early as the introduction of Greek-style games in the 2nd century&nbsp;BC but perhaps not regularly till the time of [[Nero]] around 60&nbsp;AD.<ref name=Crowther>{{cite journal|author=Crowther, Nigel B. |title=Nudity and Morality: Athletics in Italy|journal=Classical Journal|volume= 76|issue=2|year=1980|pages=119–123 |jstor=3297374 }}</ref>

Public nudity might be offensive or distasteful even in traditional settings; Cicero derides [[Mark Antony]] as undignified for appearing near-naked as a participant in the [[Lupercalia]], even though it was ritually required.<ref>Julia Heskel, "Cicero as Evidence for Attitudes to Dress in the Late Republic," in ''The World of Roman Costume'' (University of Wisconsin Press, 2001), p. 138</ref><ref name=bonfante>{{cite journal|doi=10.2307/505328|jstor=505328|title=Nudity as a Costume in Classical Art|journal=American Journal of Archaeology|volume=93|issue=4|pages=543–570 |year=1989|last1=Bonfante|first1=Larissa|author-link=Larissa Bonfante }}</ref> Nudity is one of the themes of this religious festival that most consumes Ovid's attention in the ''[[Fasti (Ovid)|Fasti]]'', his long-form poem on the [[Roman calendar]].<ref>Ovid, ''Fasti'' 2.283–380.</ref> [[Augustus]], during his program of religious revivalism, attempted to reform the Lupercalia, in part by suppressing the use of nudity despite its fertility aspect.<ref>Carole E. Newlands, ''Playing with Time: Ovid and the Fasti'' (Cornell University Press, 1995), pp. 59–60.</ref>

Negative connotations of nudity include defeat in war, since captives were stripped, and slavery, since slaves for sale were often displayed naked. The disapproval of nudity was thus less a matter of trying to suppress inappropriate sexual desire than of dignifying and marking the citizen's body as free.<ref name=":0">[[#Williams|Williams]], pp. 69–70.</ref>

[[File:Marcellus Louvre Ma1207.jpg|thumb|left|Portrait head of [[Marcellus (nephew of Augustus)|Marcellus, nephew of Augustus]] (1st century CE), on a body of the Greek [[Hermes Ludovisi]] type]]
The influence of Greek art, however, led to [[Heroic nudity|"heroic" nude portrayals]] of Roman men and gods, a practice that began in the 2nd century&nbsp;BC. When statues of Roman generals nude in the manner of [[Hellenistic ruler cult|Hellenistic kings]] first began to be displayed, they were shocking not simply because they exposed the male figure, but because they evoked concepts of royalty and [[Imperial cult (ancient Rome)#Intermediate forms|divinity]] that were contrary to Republican ideals of citizenship as embodied by the toga.<ref>Paul Zanker, ''The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus'' (University of Michigan Press, 1988), p. 5ff.</ref> In art produced under Augustus, the programmatic adoption of [[Hellenistic art|Hellenistic]] and [[Neo-Attic|Neo-Attic style]] led to more complex signification of the male body shown nude, partially nude, or costumed in a [[muscle cuirass]].<ref>Zanker, ''The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus'', pp. 239–240, 249–250 ''et passim''.</ref>

One exception to public nudity was [[thermae|the baths]], though attitudes toward nude bathing also changed over time. In the 2nd century BC, [[Cato the Elder|Cato]] preferred not to bathe in the presence of his son, and [[Plutarch]] implies that for Romans of these earlier times it was considered shameful for mature men to expose their bodies to younger males.<ref name=":2">[[Plutarch]], ''Life of Cato'' 20.5</ref><ref name=":0"/><ref>Zanker, ''The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus'', p. 6.</ref> Later, however, men and women might even bathe together.<ref group="n">Until the late Republic, a bath house probably offered women a separate wing or facility, or had a schedule that allowed women and men to bathe at different times. From the late Republic until the rise of Christian dominance in the later Empire, there is clear evidence of mixed bathing. Some scholars have thought that only lower-class women bathed with men, or those such as entertainers or prostitutes who were ''[[#Pleasure and infamy|infames]]'', but [[Clement of Alexandria]] observed that women of the highest social classes could be seen naked at the baths. [[Hadrian]] prohibited mixed bathing, but the ban seems not to have endured. In short, customs varied not only by time and place but by the facility; see Garrett G. Fagan, ''Bathing in Public in the Roman World'' (University of Michigan Press, 1999, 2002), pp. 26–27.</ref>

===Phallic sexuality===
{{See also|Fascinum}}
[[File:Bronze ithyphallic figurine with a head of phalluses.jpg|thumb|upright|Polyphallic<ref group="n">In Roman Gaul, the Celtic god identified with the Roman [[Mercury (mythology)|Mercury]] is sometimes represented triphallically; see for instance [[Miranda Aldhouse-Green|Miranda Green]], ''Symbol and Image in Celtic Religious Art'' (Routledge, 1989), p. 184. In ''The Sorrows of the Ancient Romans: The Gladiator and the Monster'' (Princeton University Press, 1993), p. 168, Carlin A. Barton associates polyphallic ''tintinnabula'' with the [[Medusa's head]] and other grotesques.</ref> bronze [[Tintinnabulum (Ancient Rome)|tintinnabulum]]; the tip of each phallus was outfitted with a ring to dangle a bell]]

Roman sexuality as framed by Latin literature has been described as [[phallocentric]].<ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], p. 84</ref><ref>David J. Mattingly, ''Imperialism, Power, and Identity: Experiencing the Roman Empire'' (Princeton University Press, 2011), p. 106.</ref> The phallus was supposed to have powers to ward off the [[evil eye]] and other malevolent supernatural forces. It was used as an [[amulet]] ''(fascinum)'', many examples of which survive, particularly in the form of [[wind chime]]s ''([[tintinnabulum (Ancient Rome)|tintinnabula]])''.<ref>[[#Hallett|Hallett]], p. 215.</ref> Some scholars have even interpreted the plan of the [[Forum Augustum]] as [[phallic architecture]].<ref>Dominic Montserrat, "Reading Gender in the Roman World," in ''Experiencing Rome: Culture, Identity, and Power in the Roman Empire'' (Routledge, 2000), pp. 168–170 (quotation on p. 169), citing also Barbara Kellum, "The Phallus as Signifier: The Forum of Augustus and Rituals of Masculinity," in ''Sexuality in Ancient Art'' (Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 170–173, and "Concealing/Revealing: Gender and the Play of Meaning in the Monuments of Ancient Rome," in [[#Habinek|Habinek]], p. 170. "Such readings of major Roman public building projects may seem fanciful, born out of the late twentieth-century fascination which wishes to see everything refracted through its prism," Montserrat notes (p. 170)</ref><ref>[[#Fredrick|Fredrick]], pp. 248–249. The idea is that the plan would have a apotropaic function mimicking on a grand scale the local effect of the ''[[Bulla (amulet)|bulla]]'' or ''[[fascinum]]''.<!--yes, Gentle Reader, you may call this preposterous--></ref>

The outsized [[phallus]] of [[Roman art]] was associated with the god [[Priapus]], among others. It was laughter-provoking, grotesque, or used for magical purposes.<ref>[[#Fredrick|Fredrick]], p. 156.</ref> Originating in the Greek town of [[Lampsacus]], Priapus was a fertility deity whose statue was placed in gardens to ward off thieves. The poetry collection called the ''[[Priapea]]'' deals with phallic sexuality, including poems spoken in the person of Priapus. In one, for instance, Priapus threatens anal rape against any potential thief. The wrath of Priapus might cause impotence, or a state of perpetual arousal with no means of release: one curse of Priapus upon a thief was that he might lack women or boys to relieve him of his erection, and burst.<ref name="auto1"/>

[[File:Lucerne a forma di satiro con fallo smisurato (forse dildo), I sec, da pompei, 27868-27869-116661.JPG|thumb|left|Ithyphallic [[satyr]]s as oil lamps (from Pompeii, 1st century AD)]]
There are approximately 120 recorded Latin terms and metaphors for the penis, with the largest category treating the male member as an instrument of aggression, a weapon.<ref>Mattingly, ''Imperialism, Power, and Identity'', p. 106.</ref> This metaphorical tendency is exemplified by actual [[Sling (weapon)#Ammunition|lead sling-bullets]], which are sometimes inscribed with the image of a phallus, or messages that liken the target to a sexual conquest—for instance "I seek [[Octavian]]'s asshole."<ref>As represented by the ''[[Sling (weapon)#Ammunition|glandes Perusinae]]''; [[#Williams|Williams]], p. 21.</ref> The most common obscenity for the penis is ''mentula'', which Martial argues for in place of polite terms: his privileging of the word as time-honored Latin from the era of [[Numa Pompilius|Numa]] may be compared to the unvarnished integrity of "[[Four-letter word|four letter Anglo-Saxon words]]".<ref>Martial, 11.15.8ff., with 48 usages throughout his epigrams</ref><ref name=a9>[[#Adams|Adams]], p. 9.</ref> ''Mentula'' appears frequently in graffiti and the ''Priapea'',<ref>Eighteen times in inscriptions from Pompeii, thrice in the ''Graffiti del Palatino'', and 26 times in the ''Priapea''; [[#Adams|Adams]], pp. 10, 12.</ref> but while obscene the word was not inherently abusive or vituperative. ''Verpa'', by contrast, was "an emotive and highly offensive word" for the penis with its [[foreskin]] drawn back, as the result of an erection, excessive sexual activity, or [[#Castration and circumcision|circumcision]].<ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], p. 13. ''Verpa'' appears once each in Catullus (28.12), Martial (11.46.2), and the ''Priapea'' (34.5). As a term of [[vulgar Latin]], it appears frequently in graffiti ([[#Adams|Adams]], pp. 12–13).</ref><ref name="Hodges2001">{{cite journal |last=Hodges |first=Frederick M. |year=2001 |title=The Ideal Prepuce in Ancient Greece and Rome: Male Genital Aesthetics and Their Relation to Lipodermos, Circumcision, Foreskin Restoration, and the Kynodesme |journal=[[Bulletin of the History of Medicine]] |publisher=[[Johns Hopkins University Press]] |volume=75 |issue=Fall 2001 |pages=375–405 |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/history/hodges2/ |format=PDF |access-date=1 December 2019 |doi=10.1353/bhm.2001.0119 |pmid=11568485 |url-access=subscription |archive-date=20 November 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181120091617/http://www.cirp.org/library/history/hodges2/ |url-status=live }}</ref> ''Virga'', as well as other words for "branch, rod, stake, beam", is a common metaphor,<ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], pp. 14–17, 23, 28.</ref> as is ''vomer'', "plough".<ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], p. 24.</ref>

[[File:Casa dei vettii, vestibolo, priapo che poggia il fallo sulla bilancia 01.jpg|thumb|[[Priapus]], wearing a [[Phrygian cap]] and weighing his phallus in a [[balance scale]] ''([[House of the Vettii]])'']]
The penis might also be referred to as the "vein" ''(vena)'', "tail" (''penis'' or ''cauda''), or "tendon" ''(nervus)''.<ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], pp. 35–38.</ref> The English word "penis" derives from ''penis'', which originally meant "tail" but in [[Classical Latin]] was used regularly as a risqué colloquialism for the male organ. Later, ''penis'' becomes the standard word in polite Latin, as used for example by the [[scholiast]] to Juvenal and by [[Arnobius]], but did not pass into usage among the [[Romance languages]].<ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], pp. 35–36.</ref> It was not a term used by medical writers, except for [[Marcellus of Bordeaux]].<ref>Marcellus, ''De medicamentis'' 7.20, 33.2, 33.36</ref><ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], p. 36.</ref> In [[medieval Latin]], a vogue for scholarly obscenity led to a perception of the [[dactyl (poetry)|dactyl]], a metrical unit of verse represented {{nowrap|<sup>— ‿ ‿</sup>,}} as an image of the penis, with the long syllable ''(longum)'' the shaft and the two short syllables ''(breves)'' the testicles.<ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], p. 39.</ref>

The apparent connection between Latin ''testes'', "testicles," and ''testis'', plural ''testes'', "witness" (the origin of English "testify" and "testimony")<ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], p. 67.</ref> may lie in archaic ritual. Some ancient Mediterranean cultures swore binding oaths upon the male genitalia, symbolizing that "the bearing of false witness brings a curse upon not only oneself, but one's house and future line".<ref>Joshua T. Katz, "''Testimonia Ritus Italicus'': Male Genitalia, Solemn Declarations, and a New Latin Sound Law," ''Harvard Studies in Classical Philology'' 98 (1998) 183–217 (quotation from p. 193), pointing to the oaths in the [[Book of Genesis]], chapters 24 and 47; the testicles of ritually slaughtered animals used to affirm testimony in Athenian murder trials, as at [[Demosthenes]], ''Contra Aristocratem'' 23.67f.; ''[[Rhetorica ad Herennium]]'' 3.33, where ram's testicles are a mnemonic device in a courtroom exercise. Katz proposes that the [[Umbrian]] [[hapax]] ''urfeta'' means "testicles" and is related to Latin ''orbis'' (as "balls"); thus the [[Iguvine Tables]] also make a connection between testicles and "solemn declarations" (Katz, p. 191).</ref> Latin writers make frequent puns and jokes based on the two meanings of ''testis'':<ref name="Katz p. 189">Katz, "''Testimonia Ritus Italicus''," p. 189.</ref> it took balls to become a legally functioning male citizen.<ref>[[#Richlin1993|Richlin (1993)]], pp. 546–547.</ref> The English word "testicle" derives from the [[diminutive]] ''testiculum''.<ref name="Katz p. 189"/> The obscene word for "testicle" was ''coleus'',<ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], p. 66.</ref> from which descends French ''[[wiktionary:couille|couille]]''.

====Castration and circumcision====
{{See also|Circumcision controversies#Classical civilization|History of male circumcision|Religious male circumcision}}
To Romans and Greeks, [[castration]] and [[circumcision]] were linked as barbaric mutilations of the male genitalia.<ref name="Hodges2001"/><ref name="Rubin1980">{{cite journal |last1=Rubin |first1=Jody P. |title=Celsus' Decircumcision Operation: Medical and Historical Implications |journal=[[Urology (journal)|Urology]] |publisher=[[Elsevier]] |volume=16 |issue=1 |pages=121–124 |date=July 1980 |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/restoration/rubin/ |doi=10.1016/0090-4295(80)90354-4 |pmid=6994325 |access-date=1 December 2019 |url-access=subscription |archive-date=8 May 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200508063726/http://www.cirp.org/library/restoration/rubin/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Neusner1993">{{Cquote|Circumcised [[barbarians]], along with any others who revealed the ''glans penis'', were the butt of ribald [[Roman jokes|humor]]. For [[Ancient Greek art|Greek art]] portrays the foreskin, often drawn in meticulous detail, as an emblem of male beauty; and children with congenitally short foreskins were sometimes subjected to a treatment, known as ''[[epispasm]]'', that was aimed at elongation.|author=[[Jacob Neusner]]|source=''Approaches to Ancient Judaism, New Series: Religious and Theological Studies'' (1993), p. 149, Scholars Press.}}</ref><ref name="Fredriksen">{{cite book |last=Fredriksen |first=Paula |author-link=Paula Fredriksen |date=2018 |title=When Christians Were Jews: The First Generation |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NW9yDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA10 |location=[[London]] |publisher=[[Yale University Press]] |pages=10–11 |isbn=978-0-300-19051-9}}</ref><ref>Juvenal 14.103–104; [[Tacitus]], ''Historia'' 5.5.1–2; Martial 7.30.5, 7.35.3–4, 7.82.5–6, 11.94; Margaret Williams, "Jews and Jewish Communities in the Roman Empire," in ''Experiencing Rome: Culture, Identity and Power in the Roman Empire'' (Routledge, 2000), p. 325</ref><ref>[[#Smallwood|Smallwood]], p. 431</ref><ref>Jack N. Lightstone, "Roman Diaspora Judaism," in ''A Companion to Roman Religion'' (Blackwell, 2007), p. 362.</ref> When the cult of [[Cybele]] was imported to Rome at the end of the 3rd century BC, its traditional [[eunuch]]ism was confined to foreign priests (the ''[[Galli]])'', while Roman citizens formed [[Glossary of ancient Roman religion#sodalitas|sodalities]] to perform honors in keeping with their own customs.<ref>Eric Orlin, "Urban Religion in the Middle and Late Republic", pp. 63–64, and John Scheid, "Sacrifices for Gods and Ancestors", p. 268, in ''A Companion to Roman Religion''.</ref> It has been argued that the [[Paul the Apostle|Apostle Paul]]'s exhortation of the [[Epistle to the Galatians|Galatians]] [[Circumcision controversy in early Christianity|not to undergo circumcision]]<ref>{{cite journal |last=Dunn |first=James D. G. |author-link=James Dunn (theologian) |date=Autumn 1993 |title=Echoes of Intra-Jewish Polemic in Paul's Letter to the Galatians |journal=[[Journal of Biblical Literature]] |publisher=[[Society of Biblical Literature]] |volume=112 |issue=3 |pages=459–477 |doi=10.2307/3267745 |jstor=3267745}}; {{cite book |editor-last=Dunn |editor-first=James D. G. |year=2007 |chapter='Neither circumcision nor uncircumcision, but...' |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hD8r9kotxQgC&pg=PA314 |title=The New Perspective on Paul: Collected Essays |series=Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament |volume=185 |location=[[Tübingen]] |publisher=[[Mohr Siebeck]] |pages=314–330 |isbn=978-3-16-149518-2}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Thiessen |first1=Matthew |date=2016 |chapter=Gentile Sons and Seed of Abraham |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=e3dYCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA105 |title=Paul and the Gentile Problem |location=[[New York City|New York]] |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |pages=105–115 |isbn=978-0-19-027175-6}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Bisschops |first1=Ralph |date=January 2017 |chapter=Metaphor in Religious Transformation: 'Circumcision of the Heart' in Paul of Tarsus |chapter-url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312589528_Metaphor_in_Religious_Transformation_%27Circumcision_of_the_Heart%27_in_Paul_of_Tarsus |chapter-format=PDF |editor1-last=Chilton |editor1-first=Paul |editor2-last=Kopytowska |editor2-first=Monika |title=Language, Religion and the Human Mind |location=[[New York City|New York]] |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |pages=1–30 |doi=10.1093/oso/9780190636647.003.0012 |isbn=978-0-19-063664-7 |access-date=1 December 2019 |archive-date=11 July 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200711152936/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312589528_Metaphor_in_Religious_Transformation_%27Circumcision_of_the_Heart%27_in_Paul_of_Tarsus |url-status=live }}</ref> should be understood not only in the context of [[Brit milah|Jewish circumcision]], but also of the ritual castration associated with Cybele, whose cult was centered in [[Galatia]].<ref>Paul of Tarsus, ''Galatians'' 4:21–5:1</ref><ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.2307/3268109 |jstor=3268109 |title=Choose Your Mother, Choose Your Master: Galatians 4:21–5:1 in the Shadow of the Anatolian Mother of the Gods |journal=Journal of Biblical Literature |volume=118 |issue=4 |pages=661–683 (680–681)|year=1999 |last1=Elliott |first1=Susan M.}}</ref><ref>"The Rhetorical Situation Revisited: Circumcision and Castration," in ''Cutting Too Close for Comfort: Paul’s Letter to the Galatians in Its Anatolian Cultic Context'' (T&T Clark International, 2003) ''passim''.</ref> Among Jews, circumcision was a marker of the [[Abrahamic covenant]]; [[Jewish diaspora|diaspora Jews]] circumcised their male slaves and [[Conversion to Judaism|adult male converts]], in addition to Jewish male infants.<ref>Lightstone, "Roman Diaspora Judaism," p. 363.</ref> Although Greco-Roman writers view circumcision as an identifying characteristic of Jews, they believed the practice to have originated in [[Ancient Egypt|Egypt]],<ref name="Hodges2001"/><ref>Several Greco-Roman writers, such as [[Strabo]], regarded the Jews as of Egyptian descent, in what was apparently their understanding of [[the Exodus]]. [[#Schafer1997|Schafer (1997)]], pp. 93–94.</ref> and recorded it among peoples they identified as [[Pre-Islamic Arabia|Arab]], [[Syria (Roman province)|Syrian]], [[Phoenicians|Phoenician]], [[Colchis|Colchian]], and [[History of Ethiopia#Antiquity|Ethiopian]].<ref>[[#Smallwood|Smallwood]], p. 430</ref><ref>[[#Schafer1997|Schafer (1997)]], pp. 93–94.</ref> The Neoplatonic philosopher [[Sallustius (Neoplatonist)|Sallustius]] associates circumcision with the strange familial–sexual customs of the [[Massagetae]] who "eat their fathers" and of the [[Persian people#Ancient history and origin|Persians]] who "preserve their nobility by begetting children on their mothers".<ref>[[#Schafer1997|Schafer (1997)]], p. 99.</ref>

[[File:Cult of Cybele castration clamp.JPG|thumb|A castration clamp from [[Roman Britain]] thought to have been used either by devotees of Cybele<ref>A. G. Francis, "On a Romano-British Castration Clamp Used in the Rites of Cybele," ''Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine'' 19 (1926) 95–110.</ref> or by veterinarians, with the heads of deities and animals having ritual significance<ref>Valérie GItton-Ripoll, "Entre archéologie et littérature: le boutoir et le ''forfex''," ''Pallas'' 101 (2016), pp. 88–91.</ref>]]

During the [[Roman Republic|Republican period]], a ''[[Roman law|Lex Cornelia]]'' prohibited various kinds of mutilation, including castration. (Two millennia later, in 1640, the poet [[Salvator Rosa|Salvatore Rosa]] would write in ''La Musica'', “Fine Cornelia law, where hast thou gone / Now that the whole of Norcia seems not enough / For the castration of boys?”)<ref>{{Cite book|last=Barbier|first=Patrick|title=The World of the Castrati: The History of an Extraordinary Operatic Phenomenon.|publisher=Editions Grasset and Fasquelle|year=1989|location=France|page=167|translator-last=Crosland|translator-first=Margaret|translator-last2=Souvenir Press (London)}}</ref> Despite these prohibitions, some Romans kept beautiful male slaves as ''deliciae'' or ''delicati'' ("toys, delights") who were sometimes castrated in an effort to preserve the androgynous looks of their youth. The emperor [[Nero]] had his [[freedman]] [[Sporus]] castrated, and married him in a public ceremony.<ref>[[#Williams|Williams]], pp. 251–252, citing Suetonius, ''Life of Nero''.</ref>

By the end of the 1st century AD, bans against castration had been enacted by the emperors [[Domitian]] and [[Nerva]] in the face of a burgeoning trade in eunuch slaves. Sometime between 128 and 132&nbsp;AD, [[Hadrian]] seems to have temporarily banned circumcision, on pain of death.<ref>[[#Schafer2003|Schäfer (2003)]], p. 150, [[#Schafer1997|Schafer (1997)]], p. 103, pointing out this depends on a single note in the ''[[Historia Augusta]]'', the historical credibility of which is often cast in doubt. [[Cassius Dio]] mentions nothing about circumcision in his account of the [[Bar Kokhba revolt]]. See also [[#Smallwood|Smallwood]], pp. 430–431, who thinks the ban makes more sense as a punitive measure after the revolt, since it "ran completely counter to the long established Roman policy of guaranteeing Jewish religious liberty."</ref> [[Antoninus Pius]] exempted Jews from the ban,<ref>[[#Schafer2003|Schäfer (2003)]], p. 150</ref><ref>[[#Smallwood|Smallwood]], p. 467.</ref> as well as Egyptian priests,<ref>[[#Smallwood|Smallwood]], p. 470.</ref> and [[Origen]] says that in his time only Jews were permitted to practice circumcision.<ref>[[#Schafer1997|Schafer (1997)]], p. 103</ref><ref>[[#Smallwood|Smallwood]], p. 469, takes Origen as meaning that circumcision was "a solely Jewish rite" by his time.</ref> Legislation under [[Constantine I|Constantine]], the first Christian emperor, freed any slave who was subjected to circumcision; in 339&nbsp;AD, circumcising a slave became punishable by death.<ref>[[#Schafer2003|Schäfer (2003)]], p. 185.</ref>

A medical procedure known as [[Foreskin restoration#History|epispasm]], which consisted of both surgical and non-surgical methods,<ref name="Hodges2001"/><ref name="Rubin1980"/><ref name="restore">{{cite journal |last1=Schultheiss |first1=Dirk |last2=Truss |first2=Michael C. |last3=Stief |first3=Christian G. |last4=Jonas |first4=Udo |title=Uncircumcision: A Historical Review of Preputial Restoration |journal=[[Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery]] |publisher=[[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]] |date=1998 |volume=101 |issue=7 |pages=1990–8 |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/restoration/schultheiss/ |doi=10.1097/00006534-199806000-00037 |pmid=9623850 |access-date=1 December 2019 |url-access=subscription |archive-date=27 May 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190527201844/http://www.cirp.org/library/restoration/schultheiss/ |url-status=live }}</ref> existed in ancient Rome and Greece to restore the [[foreskin]] and cover the [[glans penis|glans]] "for the sake of decorum".<ref name=Crowther/><ref name="Hodges2001"/><ref name="Rubin1980"/><ref name="Neusner1993"/><ref>''Causa decoris'': [[Aulus Cornelius Celsus|Celsus]], ''[[De Medicina]]'', 7.25.1A.</ref> Both were described in detail by the Greek physician [[Aulus Cornelius Celsus]] in his comprehensive encyclopedic work ''[[De Medicina]]''.<ref name="Rubin1980"/><ref name="restore"/> The surgical method involved freeing the skin covering the penis by dissection, and then pulling it forward over the glans; he also described a simpler surgical technique used on men whose [[Aposthia|prepuce is naturally insufficient]] to cover their glans.<ref name="Rubin1980"/><ref name="Neusner1993"/><ref name="restore"/> The second approach was non-surgical: a [[restoration device]] which consisted of a special weight made of bronze, copper, or leather, was affixed to the [[Human penis|penis]], pulling its skin downward.<ref name="Rubin1980"/><ref name="restore"/> Over time a new foreskin was generated, or a short prepuce was lengthened, by means of [[Tissue expansion#Foreskin restoration|tissue expansion]];<ref name="Rubin1980"/><ref name="restore"/> [[Martial]] also mentioned the restoration device in his epigrams (7:35).<ref name="restore"/> Hellenized or Romanized Jews resorted to epispasm to better integrate into Greco–Roman society, and also to make themselves less conspicuous at the baths or during athletics.<ref name="Hodges2001"/><ref name="Rubin1980"/><ref name="Fredriksen"/> Of these, some had themselves circumcised again later.<ref>[[#Schafer2003|Schäfer (2003)]], p. 151.</ref>

===Regulating semen===
Too-frequent [[ejaculation]] was thought to weaken men. [[Ancient Greek medicine|Greek medical theories]] based on the [[classical elements]] and [[humorism|humors]] recommended limiting the production of semen by means of cooling, drying, and astringent therapies, including cold baths and the avoidance of flatulence-causing foods.<ref>[[#Dugan|Dugan]], pp. 403–404.</ref> In the 2nd century AD, the medical writer [[Galen]] explains [[semen]] as a concoction of blood (conceived of as a humor) and ''[[pneuma]]'' (the "vital [[air (classical element)|air]]" required by organs to function) formed within the man's coiled [[spermatic vessels]], with the humor turning white through heat as it enters into the testicles.<ref>[[#Dugan|Dugan]], pp. 404–405. Galen's theory is based on that of [[Aristotle#Biology|Aristotle]].</ref> In his treatise ''On Semen'', Galen warns that immoderate sexual activity results in a loss of ''pneuma'' and hence vitality:

<blockquote>
It is not at all surprising that those who are less moderate sexually turn out to be weaker, since the whole body loses the purest part of both substances, and there is besides an accession of pleasure, which by itself is enough to dissolve the vital tone, so that before now some persons have died from excess of pleasure.<ref>Galen, ''De semine'' 1.16.30–32 (4.588 Kühn = De Lacy 1992, 138–41).</ref>
</blockquote>

The uncontrolled dispersing of ''pneuma'' in semen could lead to loss of physical vigor, mental acuity, masculinity, and a strong manly voice,<ref>[[#Dugan|Dugan]], p. 406.</ref> a complaint registered also in the ''[[Priapea]]''.<ref>Ann Ellis Hanson, "The Restructuring of Female Physiology at Rome," in ''Les écoles médicales à Rome'' (Université de Nantes, 1991), p. 267, citing ''[[Priapea]]'' 78 and ''[[Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum|CIL]]'' 12.6721(5), one of the [[Perusia|Perusine]] ''[[Sling (weapon)#Ammunition|glandes]]''.</ref> Sexual activity was thought particularly to affect the voice: singers and actors might be [[Kynodesme|infibulated]] to preserve their voices.<ref>Martial 6.82, Juvenal 6.73, 379; J.P. Sullivan, ''Martial, the Unexpected Classic'' (Cambridge University Press, 1991), p. 189</ref><ref>[[#Schafer1997|Schafer (1997)]], p. 101</ref><ref>Peter J. Ucko, "Penis Sheaths: A Comparative Study," in ''Material Culture: Critical Concepts in the Social Sciences'' (Routledge, 2004), p. 260.</ref> [[Quintilian]] advises that the orator who wished to cultivate a deep masculine voice for court should abstain from sexual relations.<ref>[[Quintilian]], ''Institutio Oratoria'' [https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Quintilian/Institutio_Oratoria/11C*.html#3.19 11.3.19.] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231108014118/https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Quintilian/Institutio_Oratoria/11C%2A.html#3.19 |date=2023-11-08 }}</ref> This concern was felt intensely by [[Catullus]]'s friend [[Licinius Macer Calvus|Calvus]], the 1st-century BC [[Neoteric|avant-garde poet]] and orator, who slept with lead plates over his kidneys to control [[wet dream]]s. [[Pliny the Elder|Pliny]] reports that:

<blockquote>
When plates of lead are bound to the area of the loins and kidneys, it is used, owing to its rather cooling nature, to check the attacks of sexual desire and sexual dreams in one's sleep that cause spontaneous eruptions to the point of becoming a sort of disease. With these plates the orator Calvus is reported to have restrained himself and to have preserved his body's strength for the labor of his studies.<ref>Pliny, ''Natural History'' 34.166.</ref>
</blockquote>

Lead plates, [[cupping therapy]], and [[hair removal]] were prescribed for three sexual disorders thought to be related to nocturnal emissions: satyriasis, or [[hypersexuality]]; [[priapism]], a chronic erection without an accompanying desire for sex; and the involuntary discharge of semen.<ref>The Greek word for the involuntary discharge of semen was ''gonorrhea''. [[#Dugan|Dugan]], pp. 403–404.</ref>

===Effeminacy and transvestism===
[[File:Hercules and Omphale, central panel of the Mosaic with the Labors of Hercules, 3rd century AD, found in Llíria (Valencia), National Archaeological Museum of Spain, Madrid (15457429395).jpg|thumb|Hercules and Omphale cross-dressed ''(mosaic from [[Roman Spain]], 3rd century AD)'']]
[[Effeminacy]] was a favorite accusation in Roman political invective, and was aimed particularly at ''[[populares]]'', the politicians of the faction who represented themselves as champions of the people, sometimes called Rome's "democratic" party in contrast to the ''[[optimates]]'', a conservative elite of [[nobiles|nobles]].<ref>[[#Edwards|Edwards]], pp. 63–64.</ref> In the last years of the Republic, the popularists [[Julius Caesar]], Marcus Antonius ([[Mark Antony]]), and [[Clodius Pulcher]], as well as the [[Catiline Conspiracy|Catilinarian conspirators]], were all derided as effeminate, overly-groomed, too-good-looking men who might be on the receiving end of sex from other males; at the same time, they were supposed to be womanizers or possessed of devastating sex appeal.<ref>[[#Edwards|Edwards]], p. 47.</ref>

Perhaps the most notorious incident of [[cross-dressing]] in ancient Rome occurred in 62&nbsp;BC, when Clodius Pulcher intruded on annual rites of the [[Bona Dea]] that were restricted to women only. The rites were held at a [[Executive Magistrates of the Roman Republic|senior magistrate]]'s home, in this year that of Julius Caesar, nearing the end of his term as [[praetor]] and only recently invested as [[Pontifex Maximus]]. Clodius disguised himself as a female musician to gain entrance, as described in a "verbal striptease" by Cicero, who prosecuted him for sacrilege ''([[incestum]])'':<ref>The case, which nearly shipwrecked Clodius' political career, is discussed at length by his biographer, W. Jeffrey Tatum, ''The Patrician Tribune: Publius Clodius Pulcher'' (University of North Carolina Press, 1999), p. 62ff.</ref>

<blockquote>
Take away his saffron dress, his tiara, his girly shoes and purple laces, his bra, his [[Psaltery|Greek harp]], take away his shameless behavior and his sex crime, and Clodius is suddenly revealed as a democrat.<ref>''P. Clodius, a crocota, a mitra, a muliebribus soleis purpureisque fasceolis, a strophio, a psalterio, a flagitio, a stupro est factus repente popularis'': Cicero, the speech ''De Haruspicium Responso'' 21.44, delivered May 56&nbsp;BC, and given a [[Jacques Lacan|Lacanian analysis]] by Eleanor Winsor Leach, “Gendering Clodius,” ''Classical World'' 94 (2001) 335–359.</ref>
</blockquote>

The actions of Clodius, who had just been elected [[quaestor]] and was probably about to turn thirty, are often regarded as a last juvenile prank. The all-female nature of these nocturnal rites attracted much prurient speculation from men; they were fantasized as drunken lesbian orgies that might be fun to watch.<ref name="auto2">[[#Williams|Williams]]</ref> Clodius is supposed to have intended to seduce Caesar's wife, but his masculine voice gave him away before he got a chance. The scandal prompted Caesar to seek an immediate divorce to control the damage to his own reputation, giving rise to the famous line "Caesar's wife must be above suspicion". The incident "summed up the disorder of the final years of the republic".<ref>[[#Edwards|Edwards]], p. 34</ref><ref>W. Jeffrey Tatum, ''Always I Am Caesar'' (Blackwell, 2008), p. 109.</ref>

In addition to political invective, cross-dressing appears in Roman literature and art as a mythological trope (as in the story of [[Hercules]] and [[Omphale]] exchanging roles and attire),<ref>Ovid adduces the story of Hercules and Omphale as an explanation for the ritual nudity of the Lupercalia; see under [[#Male nudity|"Male nudity" above]] and Richard J. King, ''Desiring Rome: Male Subjectivity and Reading Ovid's Fasti'' (Ohio State University Press, 2006), pp. 185, 195, 200, 204.</ref> religious [[investiture]], and rarely or ambiguously as [[transvestic fetishism]]. A section of the ''Digest'' by [[Ulpian]]<ref>''Digest'' 34.2.23.2, as cited in [[#Richlin1993|Richlin (1993)]], p. 540.</ref> categorizes [[Clothing in ancient Rome|Roman clothing]] on the basis of who may appropriately wear it; a man who wore women's clothes, Ulpian notes, would risk making himself the object of scorn. A fragment from the playwright [[Lucius Accius|Accius]] (170–86&nbsp;BC) seems to refer to a father who secretly wore "virgin's finery".<ref>''Cum virginali mundo clam pater'': Olson, "The Appearance of the Young Roman Girl," p. 147.</ref> An instance of [[transvestism]] is noted in a legal case, in which "a certain senator accustomed to wear women's evening clothes" was disposing of the garments in his will.<ref>''Digest'' 34.2.33, as cited in [[#Richlin1993|Richlin (1993)]], p. 540.</ref> In a "[[mock trial]]" exercise presented by [[Seneca the Elder|the elder Seneca]], a young man ''(adulescens)'' is gang-raped while wearing women's clothes in public, but his attire is explained as his acting on a dare by his friends, not as a choice based on gender identity or the pursuit of erotic pleasure.<ref name="homosexuality564">[[Seneca the Elder]], ''Controversia'' 5.6</ref><ref name="auto3">[[#Richlin1993|Richlin (1993)]], p. 564.</ref>

Gender ambiguity was a characteristic of the priests of the goddess [[Cybele]] known as ''[[Galli]]'', whose ritual attire included items of women's clothing. They are sometimes considered a [[transgender]] priesthood, since they were required to be castrated in imitation of [[Attis]]. The complexities of gender identity in the religion of Cybele and the Attis myth are explored by Catullus in one of his longest poems, [[Catullus 63|''Carmen'' 63]].<ref>Stephen O. Murray, ''Homosexualities'' (University of Chicago Press, 2000), pp. 298–303; Mary R. Bachvarova, "Sumerian ''Gala'' Priests and Eastern Mediterranean Returning Gods: Tragic Lamentation in Cross-Cultural Perspective," in ''Lament: Studies in the Ancient Mediterranean and Beyond'' (Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 19, 33, 36. See also [[#Hermaphroditism and androgyny|"Hermaphroditism and androgyny" below]].</ref>

===Male–male sex===
[[File:Warren Cup BM GR 1999.4-26.1 n2.jpg|thumb|right|Pederastic sex on the "Roman" side of the [[Warren Cup]] ([[British Museum]], London, 15 BCE – 15 CE)]]
{{Main|Homosexuality in ancient Rome}}
Roman men were free to have sex with males of lower status with no perceived loss of masculine prestige, and indeed, sexual mastery and dominance of others - regardless of their sex - could even enhance their masculinity. However, those who took the receiving role in sex acts, sometimes referred to as the "passive" or "submissive" role, were disparaged as weak and effeminate (see the section below on [[#Cunnilingus and fellatio|cunnilungus and fellatio]]),<ref name=h55 /> while having sex with males in the active position was proof of one's masculinity.<ref name=h55 /> Physical mastery over other people was an aspect of the citizen's ''libertas'', political liberty,<ref>For an explanation of this principle in a military setting, see [[#Phang2008|Phang (2008)]], p. 93.</ref> and that certainly included for the purpose of sexual gratification, whether that was with a woman or a man. On the other hand, allowing one's body to be subjugated for the pleasure of others, particularly for sexual purposes, was seen as degrading and a mark of weakness and servility. Laws such as the poorly understood ''[[Lex Scantinia]]'' and various pieces of [[Lex Iulia|Augustan moral legislation]] were meant to restrict same-sex activity among freeborn males, viewed as threatening a man's status and independence as a citizen.

Latin had such a wealth of words for men outside the masculine norm that some scholars<ref>[[#Richlin1993|Richlin (1993)]]</ref> argue for the existence of a homosexual [[subculture]] at Rome; that is, although the noun "homosexual" has no straightforward equivalent in Latin and is an anachronism when applied to Roman culture, literary sources do reveal a pattern of behaviors among a minority of free men that indicate same-sex preference or orientation. Some terms, such as ''[[exoletus]]'', specifically refer to an adult; Romans who were socially marked as "masculine" did not confine their same-sex penetration of male prostitutes or slaves to those who were "boys" under the age of 20.<ref>[[#Williams|Williams]], p. 85.</ref> The ''Satyricon'', for example, includes many descriptions of adult, free men showing sexual interest in one another. Some older men may at times have preferred the passive role with a partner of the same age or younger, but this was socially frowned upon.

[[File:Roman-era perfume bottle made of cameo glass showing homoerotic scene.jpg|thumb|upright 1.2|Cameo glass perfume bottle, found in the Roman necropolis of Ostippo, Spain (25 BCE–14 CE), showing two males on a bed; the other side, not shown, has a female and a male (George Ortiz Collection)]]
Homoerotic Latin literature includes the "Juventius" poems of [[Catullus]],<ref>[[Catullus]], ''Carmina'' 24, 48, 81, 99.</ref> elegies by [[Tibullus]]<ref>[[Tibullus]], Book One, elegies 4, 8, and 9.</ref> and [[Propertius]],<ref>[[Propertius]] 4.2.</ref> the second ''[[Eclogues|Eclogue]]'' of [[Vergil]], and several poems by [[Horace]]. [[#Epicurean sexuality|Lucretius]] addresses the love of boys in ''De rerum natura'' (4.1052–1056). The poet [[Martial]], despite being married to a woman, often derides women as sexual partners, and celebrates the charms of ''pueri'' (boys).<ref>Amy Richlin, "Sexuality in the Roman Empire," in A Companion to the Roman Empire (Blackwell, 2006), p. 335: ''"The sulks and pride of these boys and their petulant quarrels . . . I prefer to a dowry of a million sesterces."''</ref> The ''[[Satyricon]]'' of [[Petronius]] is so permeated with the culture of male–male sexuality that in 18th-century European literary circles, his name became "a byword for homosexuality".<ref>Louis Crompton, ''Byron and Greek Love'' (London, 1998), p. 93.</ref> Although [[Ovid]] includes mythological treatments of homoeroticism in the ''[[Metamorphoses]]'',<ref>As at ''Metamorphoses'' 10.155ff.</ref> he is unusual among Latin love poets, and indeed among Romans in general, for his aggressively heterosexual stance, though even he did not claim exclusive heterosexuality.<ref name=h55>[[#Hallett|Hallett]]. p. 55.</ref>

Although Roman law did not recognize marriage between men, in the early Imperial period some male couples were celebrating [[Marriage in ancient Rome|traditional marriage rites]]. Same-sex weddings are reported by sources that mock them; the feelings of the participants are not recorded.<ref>Both Juvenal (for instance, in ''Satire'' 2) and Martial describe weddings between men. Suetonius reports that the emperor Nero had two marriages to men, once taking the role of the bride, and once the groom. [[#Williams|Williams]], p. 28</ref><ref>Karen K. Hersh, ''The Roman Wedding: Ritual and Meaning in Antiquity'' (Cambridge University Press, 2010), p. 36; [[Caroline Vout]], ''Power and Eroticism in Imperial Rome'' (Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 151ff.</ref>

Apart from measures to protect the liberty of citizens, the prosecution of homosexuality as a general crime began in the 3rd century when [[male prostitution]] was banned by [[Philip the Arab]], a sympathizer of the [[Christianity|Christian]] faith. By the end of the 4th century, passive homosexuality under the [[Constantine the Great and Christianity|Christian Empire]] was [[Death by burning|punishable by burning]].<ref>Michael Groneberg, "Reasons for Homophobia: Three Types of Explanation," in ''Combatting Homophobia: Experiences and Analyses Pertinent to Education'' (LIT Verlag, 2011), p. 193.</ref> "Death by sword" was the punishment for a "man coupling like a woman" under the [[Theodosian Code]].<ref>''Codex Theodosianus'' 9.7.3 (4 December 342), introduced by the sons of Constantine in 342.</ref> Under [[Justinian]], all same-sex acts, passive or active, no matter who the partners, were declared contrary to nature and punishable by death.<ref>Groneberg, "Reasons for Homophobia," p. 193.</ref> Homosexual behaviors were pointed to as causes for [[Divine retribution|God's wrath]] following a series of disasters around 542 and 559.<ref>Michael Brinkschröde, "Christian Homophobia: Four Central Discourses," in ''Combatting Homophobia'', p. 166.</ref> Justinian also demanded the penalty of death for anyone who enslaved a castrated Roman, although he permitted the buying and selling of foreign-born eunuchs as long as they were castrated outside the boundaries of the Roman Empire (''Codex Justinianus,'' 4.42.2).<ref>{{Cite book|last=Scholz|first=Piotr O.|title=Eunuchs and Castrati: A Cultural History|publisher=Markus Wiener|year=1999|isbn=9781558762015|pages=112–3}}</ref>

===Rape of men===
Men who had been raped were exempt from the loss of legal or social standing ''([[infamia]])'' suffered by males who prostituted themselves or willingly took the receiving role in sex.<ref>[[#Richlin1993|Richlin (1993)]], pp. 558–559.</ref> According to the jurist [[Sextus Pomponius|Pomponius]], "whatever man has been raped by the force of robbers or the enemy in wartime ''(vi praedonum vel hostium)''" ought to bear no stigma.<ref>''Digest'' 3.1.1.6, as noted in [[#Richlin1993|Richlin (1993)]], p. 559.</ref> Fears of mass rape following a military defeat extended equally to male and female potential victims.<ref>[[#Williams|Williams]], pp. 104–105.</ref>

[[File:Rape Hylas Massimo.jpg|thumb|The mythological abduction or "rape" of [[Hylas]] by the [[nymph]]s (''[[opus sectile]]'', [[basilica of Junius Bassus]], 4th century AD)]]
Roman law addressed the rape of a male citizen as early as the 2nd century BC, when a ruling was issued in a case that may have involved a male of same-sex orientation. Although a man who had worked as a prostitute could not be raped as a matter of law, it was ruled that even a man who was "disreputable ''(famosus)'' and questionable ''(suspiciosus)''" had the same right as other free men not to have his body subjected to forced sex.<ref>As recorded in a fragment of the speech ''De Re Floria'' by [[Cato the Elder]] (frg. 57 Jordan = [[Aulus Gellius]] 9.12.7), as noted and discussed in [[#Richlin1993|Richlin (1993)]], p. 561.</ref> In a book on rhetoric from the early 1st century BC, the rape of a freeborn male ''([[ingenui|ingenuus]])'' is equated with that of a ''materfamilias'' as a capital crime.<ref>''[[Rhetorica ad Herennium]]'' 4.8.12</ref><ref name="auto4">[[#Richlin1993|Richlin (1993)]], p. 562.</ref> The ''Lex Julia de vi publica'',<ref>''Digest'' 48.6.3.4 and 48.6.5.2.</ref> recorded in the early 3rd century AD but "probably dating from the [[Roman dictator|dictatorship]] of Julius Caesar", defined rape as forced sex against "boy, woman, or anyone"; the rapist was subject to execution, a rare penalty in Roman law.<ref>[[#Richlin1993|Richlin (1993)]], pp. 562–563. See also ''Digest'' 48.5.35 [34] on legal definitions of rape that included boys.</ref> It was a capital crime for a man to abduct a free-born boy for sexual purposes, or to bribe the boy's chaperone ''(comes)'' for the opportunity.<ref>[[Paulus (jurist)|Paulus]], ''Digest'' 47.11.1.2</ref> Negligent chaperones could be prosecuted under various laws, placing the blame on those who failed in their responsibilities as guardians rather than on the victim.<ref name=":1">[[#Richlin1993|Richlin (1993)]], p. 563.</ref> Although the law recognized the victim's blamelessness, rhetoric used by the defense indicates that attitudes of blame among jurors could be exploited.<ref name="auto3"/>

In his collection of twelve anecdotes dealing with assaults on chastity, the historian [[Valerius Maximus]] features male victims in equal number to female.<ref>[[Valerius Maximus]] 6.1</ref><ref name="auto3"/> In the "[[mock trial]]" case described by [[Seneca the Elder|the elder Seneca]], an ''adulescens'' (a man young enough not to have begun his formal career) was gang-raped by ten of his peers; although the case is imaginary, Seneca assumes that the law permitted the successful prosecution of the rapists.<ref name="homosexuality564"/> Another hypothetical case imagines the extremity to which a rape victim could be driven: the free-born male who was raped commits suicide.<ref>[[Quintilian]], ''Institutio oratoria'' 4.2.69–71</ref><ref>[[#Richlin1993|Richlin (1993)]], p. 565.</ref> The rape of an ''ingenuus'' is among the worst crimes that could be committed in Rome, along with [[parricide]], the rape of a female virgin, and robbing a temple.<ref>[[#Richlin1993|Richlin (1993)]], p. 565, citing the same passage by Quintilian.</ref> Rape was nevertheless one of the traditional punishments inflicted on a male adulterer by the wronged husband,<ref>[[#Williams|Williams]], pp. 27, 76 (with an example from [[Martial]] 2.60.2.</ref> though perhaps more in revenge fantasy than in practice.<ref>[[#Edwards|Edwards]], pp. 55–56.</ref> The threat of one man to subject another to anal or oral rape ''([[irrumatio]])'' is a theme of invective poetry, most notably in Catullus' notorious [[Catullus 16|''Carmen'' 16]],<ref>[[#Richlin1983|Richlin (1983)]], pp. 27–28, 43 (on Martial), 58.</ref> and was a form of masculine braggadocio.<ref>[[#Williams|Williams]], p. 20</ref><ref>[[#Hallett|Hallett]], p. 12</ref><ref name=richlin1981>{{cite journal|author=Richlin, Amy |title=The Meaning of ''irrumare'' in Catullus and Martial|journal=Classical Philology|volume= 76|issue=1|year=1981|pages=40–46|jstor=269544 }}</ref>

===Sex in the military===
The Roman soldier, like any free and respectable Roman male of status, was expected to show self-discipline in matters of sex. Soldiers convicted of adultery were given a [[dishonorable discharge]]; convicted adulterers were barred from enlisting. Strict commanders might ban prostitutes and pimps from camp,<ref name="prostitution40">[[#McGinn1998|McGinn (1998)]], p. 40.</ref> though in general the [[Roman army]], whether on the march or at a permanent fort ''([[castra|castrum]])'', was attended by a number of camp followers who might include prostitutes. Their presence seems to have been taken for granted, and mentioned mainly when it became a problem.<ref name="prostitution40"/>

Perhaps most peculiar is the prohibition against marriage in the Imperial army. In the early period, Rome had an army of citizens who left their families and took up arms as the need arose. During the [[Roman Republic#Punic_Wars_and_expansion_in_the_Mediterranean|expansionism of the Middle Republic]], Rome began acquiring vast territories to be defended as provinces, and during the time of [[Gaius Marius]] (d. 86&nbsp;BC), the army had been professionalized. The ban on marriage began under [[Augustus]] (ruled 27&nbsp;BC–14&nbsp;AD), perhaps to discourage families from following the army and impairing its mobility. The marriage ban applied to all ranks up to the [[centurion]]ate; men of the governing classes were exempt. By the 2nd century AD, the [[Pax Romana|stability of the Empire]] kept most units in permanent forts, where attachments with local women often developed. Although legally these unions could not be formalized as marriages, their value in providing emotional support for the soldiers was recognized. After a soldier was discharged, the couple were granted the right of legal marriage as citizens ''([[Marriage in ancient Rome|conubium]])'', and any children they already had were considered to have been born to citizens.<ref>Pat Southern, ''The Roman Army: A Social and Institutional History'' (Oxford University Press, 2006), p. 144.</ref> [[Septimius Severus]] rescinded the ban in 197&nbsp;AD.<ref>[[#Phang2001|Phang (2001)]], p. 2.</ref>

Other forms of sexual gratification available to soldiers were the [[#Master-slave relations|use of male slaves]], [[war rape]], and same-sex relations.<ref>[[#Phang2001|Phang (2001)]], p. 3. The ''[[De Bello Hispaniensi|Bellum Hispaniense]]'', about [[Caesar's civil war]] on the front in [[Roman Spain]], mentions an officer who has a male concubine ''(concubinus)'' on campaign.</ref> Homosexual behavior among soldiers was subject to harsh penalties, including death,<ref name="prostitution40"/> as a violation of [[military discipline]]. [[Polybius]] (2nd century BC) reports that same-sex activity in the military was punishable by the ''[[fustuarium]]'', clubbing to death.<ref>[[Polybius]], ''[[The Histories (Polybius)|Histories]]'' [https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Polybius/6*.html#37 6.37.9] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220221115542/https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Polybius/6%2A.html#37 |date=2022-02-21 }} (translated as [[bastinado]]).</ref> Sex among fellow soldiers violated the Roman decorum against intercourse with another freeborn male. A soldier maintained his masculinity by not allowing his body to be used for sexual purposes. This physical integrity stood in contrast to the limits placed on his actions as a free man within the military hierarchy; most strikingly, Roman soldiers were the only citizens regularly subjected to corporal punishment, reserved in the civilian world mainly for slaves. Sexual integrity helped distinguish the status of the soldier, who otherwise sacrificed a great deal of his civilian autonomy, from that of the slave.<ref>[[#Phang2008|Phang (2008)]], p. 93. See also [[#Master-slave relations|"Master-slave relations"]] below.</ref> In warfare, rape signified defeat, another motive for the soldier not to compromise his body sexually.<ref>[[#Phang2008|Phang (2008)]], p. 94. Roman law recognized that a soldier was vulnerable to rape by the enemy: ''Digest'' 3.1.1.6, as discussed in [[#Richlin1993|Richlin (1993)]], p. 559.</ref>

[[File:Caesar venustrophy3b.jpg|thumb|Reverse side of a [[denarius]] issued by [[Julius Caesar]], depicting a military trophy with a [[#Male nudity|nude]] captured Gaul and a [[#Sexual conquest and imperialism|female personification of defeated ''Gallia'']]; Venus is pictured on the obverse]]
An incident related by [[Plutarch]] in his biography of Marius illustrates the soldier's right to maintain his sexual integrity. A good-looking young recruit named Trebonius<ref>The name is given elsewhere as Plotius.</ref> had been [[sexual harassment|sexually harassed]] over a period of time by his superior officer, who happened to be Marius' nephew, Gaius Luscius. One night, having fended off unwanted advances on numerous occasions, Trebonius was summoned to Luscius' tent. Unable to disobey the command of his superior, he found himself the object of a sexual assault and drew his sword, killing Luscius. A conviction for killing an officer typically resulted in execution. When brought to trial, he was able to produce witnesses to show that he had repeatedly had to fend off Luscius, and "had never prostituted his body to anyone, despite offers of expensive gifts". Marius not only acquitted Trebonius in the killing of his kinsman, but gave him a [[Roman military decorations and punishments#Crowns|crown for bravery]].<ref>Plutarch, ''Life of Marius'' 14.4–8; see also Valerius Maximus 6.1.12 and Cicero, ''Pro Milone'' 9, in Dillon and Garland, ''Ancient Rome'', p. 380</ref><ref>[[#Phang2008|Phang (2008)]], pp. 93–94</ref><ref>[[#Phang2001|Phang (2001)]], p. 281</ref><ref>[[#Cantarella|Cantarella]], pp. 105–106.</ref> Roman historians record other cautionary tales of officers who abuse their authority to coerce sex from their soldiers, and then suffer dire consequences.<ref>[[#Phang2001|Phang (2001)]], pp. 280–282.</ref> The youngest officers, who still might retain some of the adolescent attraction that Romans favored in male–male relations, were advised to beef up their masculine qualities, such as not wearing perfume, nor trimming nostril and underarm hair.<ref>[[#Phang2008|Phang (2008)]], p. 97, citing among other examples Juvenal, ''Satire'' 14.194–195.</ref>

During wartime, the violent use of war captives for sex was not considered criminal rape.<ref>[[#Phang2008|Phang (2008)]], pp. 244, 253–254.</ref> [[War rape|Mass rape]] was one of the acts of punitive violence during the sack of a city,<ref>[[#Phang2008|Phang (2008)]], pp. 267–268.</ref> but if the siege had ended through diplomatic negotiations rather than storming the walls, [[ius gentium|by custom]] the inhabitants were neither enslaved nor subjected to personal violence. Mass rape occurred in some circumstances, and is likely to be underreported in the surviving sources, but was not a deliberate or pervasive strategy for controlling a population.<ref>C.R. Whittaker, ''Rome and Its Frontiers: The Dynamics of Empire'' (Routledge, 2004), pp. 128–132.</ref> An ethical ideal of sexual self-control among enlisted men was vital to preserving peace once hostilities ceased. In territories and [[Roman province|provinces]] brought under treaty with Rome, soldiers who committed rape against the local people might be subjected to harsher punishments than civilians.<ref>[[#Phang2008|Phang (2008)]], pp. 256, 261.</ref> [[Sertorius]], the long-time [[Roman governor|governor]] of [[Roman Spain]] whose policies emphasized respect and cooperation with provincials, executed an entire [[Cohort (military unit)|cohort]] when a single soldier had attempted to rape a local woman.<ref>[[Appian]], ''Bellum Civile'' 1.13.109</ref><ref>[[#Phang2008|Phang (2008)]], pp. 124 and 257.</ref> Mass rape seems to have been more common as a punitive measure during [[Roman civil wars]] than abroad.<ref>Whittaker, ''Rome and Its Frontiers,'' pp. 131–132.</ref>

==Female sexuality==
{{See also|Women in ancient Rome}}
[[File:A Roman lady as Venus, from Frattochia near Rome, c. AD 98-117, Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, Copenhagen (12949076755).jpg|thumb|upright|A Roman woman with a [[Flavian dynasty|Flavian-era]] hairstyle portrayed as ''[[Capitoline Venus|Venus pudica]]'', 98-117 CE]]
Because of the Roman emphasis on family, [[female sexuality]] was regarded as one of the bases for social order and prosperity. Female citizens were expected to exercise their sexuality within marriage, and were honored for their sexual integrity ''([[pudicitia]])'' and fecundity: [[Augustus]] granted special honors and privileges to women who had given birth to three children (see ''"[[Ius trium liberorum]]"''). Control of female sexuality was regarded as necessary for the stability of the state, as embodied most conspicuously in the absolute virginity of the Vestals.<ref>Beth Severy, ''Augustus and the Family at the Birth of the Roman Empire'' (Routledge, 2003), p. 39.</ref> A Vestal who violated her vow was entombed alive in a ritual that mimicked some aspects of a [[Roman funerals and burial|Roman funeral]]; her lover was executed.<ref>Hans-Friedrich Mueller, ''Roman Religion in Valerius Maximus'' (Routledge, 2002), p. 51.</ref> Female sexuality, either disorderly or exemplary, often impacts state religion in times of crisis for the Republic.<ref>[[#Langlands|Langlands]], p. 57.</ref>

As was the case for men, free women who displayed themselves sexually, such as prostitutes and performers, or who made themselves available indiscriminately were excluded from legal protections and social respectability.<ref>See further discussion at [[#Pleasure and infamy|Pleasure and infamy below]].</ref>

Many Roman literary sources approve of respectable women exercising sexual passion within marriage.<ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], p. 103.</ref> While ancient literature overwhelmingly takes a male-centered view of sexuality, the Augustan poet [[Ovid]] expresses an explicit and virtually unique interest in how women experience intercourse.<ref>Roy K. Gibson, ''Ars Amatoria Book 3'' (Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 398–399.</ref>

===Female body===
[[File:Tellus - Ara Pacis.jpg|thumb|upright 1.5|Divine semi-nudity on the [[Ara Pacis|Augustan Altar of Peace]], combining Roman symbolism with a Greek stylistic influence]]

Roman attitudes toward female nudity differed from but were influenced by those of the Greeks, who idealized the male body in the nude while portraying respectable women clothed. Partial nudity of goddesses in Roman Imperial art, however, can highlight the breasts as dignified but pleasurable images of nurturing, abundance, and peacefulness.<ref name=bonfante/><ref>Cohen, "Divesting the Female Breast," p. 66; Cameron, ''The Last Pagans'', p. 725</ref> Erotic art indicates that women with small breasts and wide hips had the ideal [[Female body shape|body type]].<ref>[[Kelly Olson (classicist)|Kelly Olson]], "The Appearance of the Young Roman Girl," in ''Roman Dress and the Fabrics of Roman Culture'' (University of Toronto Press, 2008), p. 143</ref><ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], p. 34.</ref> By the 1st century AD, Roman art shows a broad interest in the female nude engaged in varied activities, including sex.<ref>[[#Fredrick|Fredrick]], p. 160.</ref> Pornographic art that depicts women presumed to be prostitutes performing sex acts may show the breasts covered by a ''strophium'' even when the rest of the body is naked.

In the real world, as described in literature, prostitutes sometimes displayed themselves naked at the entrance to their brothel cubicles, or wore see-through silk garments; slaves for sale were often displayed naked to allow buyers to inspect them for defects, and to symbolize that they lacked the right to control their own body.<ref>Alastair J. L. Blanshard, ''Sex: Vice and Love from Antiquity to Modernity'' (Wiley-Blackwell, 2010), p. 24</ref><ref>[[#Harper|Harper]], pp. 293–294.</ref> As [[Seneca the Elder]] described a woman for sale:

<blockquote>
Naked she stood on the shore, at the pleasure of the purchaser; every part of her body was examined and felt. Would you hear the result of the sale? The pirate sold; the pimp bought, that he might employ her as a prostitute.<ref>Seneca, ''Controversia'' 1.2.</ref>
</blockquote>

{{multiple image
| align = right
| footer = 
| image1 = Venere callipigia, I-II secolo da orig. greco del III sec. ac, 02.JPG
| width1 = 100
| alt1 =
| caption1 = 
| image2 = Wall painting - love-making - Pompeii - Napoli MAN 27684.jpg
| width2 = 
| alt2 =
| caption2 = Above, a wall painting from Pompeii depicting the full buttocks characteristic of "callipygian" Venus, shown left in a 1st–2nd century AD Roman version (restored by [[Carlo Albacini]])
}}

====Female genitals====
The "basic obscenity" for the female genitalia is ''cunnus'', "[[cunt]]", though perhaps not as strongly offensive as the English.<ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], pp. 80–81.</ref> Martial uses the word more than thirty times, Catullus once, and [[Horace]] thrice only in his early work; it also appears in the ''Priapea'' and graffiti.<ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], p. 81.</ref> One of the slang words women used for their genitals was ''porcus'', "pig", particularly when mature women spoke of girls. Varro connects this usage of the word to the sacrifice of a pig to the goddess Ceres in preliminary wedding rites.<ref>Varro, ''On Agriculture'' 2.4.9; Karen K. Hersch, ''The Roman Wedding: Ritual and Meaning in Antiquity'' (Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 122, 276; Barbette Stanley Spaeth, ''The Roman Goddess Ceres'' (University of Texas Press, 1996), p. 17.</ref> Metaphors of fields, gardens, and meadows are common, as is the image of the masculine "plough" in the feminine "furrow".<ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], pp. 82–83.</ref> Other metaphors include cave, ditch, pit, bag, vessel, door, hearth, oven, and altar.<ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], pp. 85–89.</ref>

Although women's genitals appear often in invective and satiric verse as objects of disgust, they are rarely referred to in Latin love elegy.<ref>[[#Richlin1983|Richlin (1983)]], pp. xvi, 26, 68–69, 109, 276 ''et passim''.</ref> Ovid, the most heterosexual of the classic love poets, is the only one to refer to giving a woman pleasure through genital stimulation.<ref>Throughout the ''[[Ars Amatoria]]'' ("Art of Love"); Gibson, ''Ars Amatoria Book 3'', p. 399.</ref> Martial writes of female genitalia only insultingly, describing one woman's vagina as "loose ... as the foul gullet of a pelican".<ref>Martial, ''Epigrams'' 11.21.1, 10: ''tam laxa ... quam turpe guttur onocrotali''</ref><ref>[[#Richlin1983|Richlin (1983)]], p. 27.</ref> The vagina is often compared to a boy's anus as a receptacle for the phallus.<ref>[[#Richlin1983|Richlin (1983)]], pp. 49, 67</ref><ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], pp. 21, 48, 116.</ref>

[[File:Pompeii - House of Menander - Caldarium - Mosaic 1.jpg|thumb|upright|Female genitalia formed from [[strigil]]s on a mosaic]]
The function of the [[clitoris]] ''(landica)'' was "well understood".<ref name=":3">[[#Adams|Adams]], p. 97.</ref> In [[classical Latin]], ''landica'' was a highly indecorous obscenity found in graffiti and the ''Priapea''; the clitoris was usually referred to with a metaphor, such as Juvenal's ''crista'' ("crest").<ref>Juvenal 6.422</ref><ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], p. 98.</ref> Cicero records that a hapless speaker of [[Roman consul|consular rank]] broke up the [[Roman senate|senate]] just by saying something that sounded like ''landica'': ''hanc culpam maiorem an il-''lam dicam''?'' ("Shall I call this fault greater or that one?" heard as "this greater fault or a clitoris?"). "Could he have been more obscene?" Cicero exclaims, observing at the same time that ''cum nos'', "when we", sounds like ''cunnus''.<ref>Cicero, ''Ad familiares'' 9.22.2</ref><ref name=":3"/><ref>Richard W. Hooper, ''The Priapus Poems: Erotic Epigrams from Ancient Rome'' (University of Illinois Press, 1999), p. 136.</ref> A lead sling-bullet uncovered through archaeology was inscribed "I aim for Fulvia's clit" ''(Fulviae landicam peto)'', [[Fulvia]] being the wife of Mark Antony who commanded troops during the civil wars of the 40s and 30s.<ref>Hooper, ''The Priapus Poems'', pp. 135–136. See also [[#Phallic sexuality|"Phallic sexuality" above]] for more on sling bullets inscribed with obscenities.</ref>

Latin lacked a standard word for [[labia]];<ref name="vocabulary99">[[#Adams|Adams]], p. 99.</ref> two terms found in medical writers are ''orae'', "edges" or "shores",<ref>[[Aulus Cornelius Celsus|Celsus]] 2.7.15, 7.26.1C, 7.26.4, 7.28.1.</ref> and ''pinnacula'', "little wings".<ref name="vocabulary99"/> The first recorded instance of the word ''vulva'' occurs in Varro's work on agriculture (1st century BC), where it refers to the membrane that surrounds a fetus.<ref>Varro, ''On Agriculture'' 2.1.19</ref><ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], p. 101.</ref> In the early Empire, ''vulva'' came into usage for "womb", the usual word for which had been ''uterus'' in the Republic, or sometimes more vaguely ''venter'' or ''alvus'', both words for "belly". ''Vulva'' seems originally to have referred to the womb of animals, but is "extremely common" in Pliny's ''[[Natural History (Pliny)|Natural History]]'' for a human uterus.<ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], pp. 100–101.</ref> In the Imperial era, ''vulva'' can mean "female reproductive organs" collectively or vaguely, or sometimes refers to the vagina alone.<ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], pp. 103–105.</ref> Early [[Bible translations into Latin|Latin Bible translators]] used ''vulva'' as the correct and proper word for the womb.<ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], p. 105.</ref> At some point during the Imperial era, ''matrix'' became the common word for "uterus", particularly in the [[Women in Ancient Rome#Gynecology and medicine|gynecological writers]] of [[late antiquity]], who also employ a specialized vocabulary for parts of the reproductive organs.<ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], pp. 105–109.</ref>

Both women and men often removed their pubic hair,<ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], p. 216. This is particularly characteristic of the 1st century AD, the period from which the most explicit erotic art survives.</ref> but grooming may have varied over time and by individual preference. A fragment from the early satirist [[Gaius Lucilius|Lucilius]] refers to penetrating a "hairy bag",<ref>Lucilius, frg. 61 Warmington: ''in bulgam penetrare pilosam''.</ref> and a graffito from Pompeii declares that "a hairy cunt is fucked much better than one which is smooth; it's steamy and wants cock".<ref>''[[Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum|CIL]]'' 4.1830: ''futuitur cunnus pilossus multo melliur quam glaber; eadem continet vaporem et eadem vellit mentulam''; [[#Younger|Younger]], p. 75.</ref>

At the entrance to a ''[[caldarium]]'' in the [[thermae|bath complex]] of the [[House of Menander]] at Pompeii, an unusual graphic device appears on a mosaic: a phallic oil can is surrounded by [[strigil]]s in the shape of female genitalia, juxtaposed with an "Ethiopian" water-bearer who has an "unusually large and comically detailed" penis.<ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], pp. 133–134. Romans tended to identify most black Africans as "Ethiopian".</ref>

====Breasts====
[[File:Fragment of wall painting depicting a satyr and a maenad, from the House of Caecilius Jucundus in Pompeii, Naples National Archaeological Museum (17322266511).jpg|thumb|Pompeiian wall painting ([[Secret Museum, Naples]])]]

Latin words for "breasts" include ''mammae'' (cf. English "mammary"), ''papillae'' (more specifically for "nipples"), and ''ubera'', breasts in their capacity to provide nourishment, including the teats or udder of an animal.<ref group="n">Breasts are never ''ubera'' in Ovid's ''[[Amores (Ovid)|Amores]]'', but are ''ubera'' throughout the ''Metamorphoses'': at 3.31 (metaphorically); 4.324; 10.392; 9.358 (''materna ... ubera'', "motherly breasts"); 7.321 and 6.342 ''(lactantia ubera'', "milk-producing breasts"); 15.117 and 472. ''Uber'' (singular) or ''ubera'' is used for animals by Ovid, ''Ars Amatoria'' 1.350 (the udder of a cow) and 2.375 (the teats of lactating dogs); by Horace, ''Sermones'' 1.1.110, ''Odes'' 2.19.10, 4.4.14 and 4.15.5, and elsewhere; by Tibullus, for sheep in 1.3.45; by Propertius, 2.34b.</ref> ''Papillae'' is the preferred word when Catullus and the [[Augustan literature (ancient Rome)|Augustan poets]] take note of breasts in an erotic context.<ref>Catullus, ''Carmina'' 40.12, 61.101, 64.65, 66.81. Ovid takes note of "handy nipples" (''Amores'' 1.4.37, ''habiles papillae''); see also 1.5.20 and 2.15.11, the poem in which he addresses the ring he's giving to his girlfriend, and fantasizes about the various ways it will touch her, "...since I would desire to have touched the breasts of my mistress and to have inserted my left hand within her sheath." The usage of Propertius is more varied; when he wrestles with his naked mistress, her nipples fight back (3.14.20).</ref>

The breasts of a beautiful woman were supposed to be "unobtrusive." Idealized breasts in the tradition of [[Hellenistic poetry]] were compared to apples;<ref>As for instance at [[Rufinus (poet)|Rufinus]] 5.60, 62</ref><ref>[[#Richlin1983|Richlin (1983)]], pp. 49, 52.</ref> Martial makes fun of large breasts.<ref>Martial, ''Epigrams'' 1.100, 2.52, 14.66, 14.134, 14.149</ref><ref>[[#Richlin1983|Richlin (1983)]], p. 54</ref><ref>Craig A. Williams ''Epigrams: Martial'' (Oxford University Press, 2004), p. 181.</ref> Old women who were stereotypically ugly and undesirable in every way had "pendulous" breasts.<ref>[[#Richlin1983|Richlin (1983)]], pp. 52, 68.</ref> On the [[Theatre of ancient Rome|Roman stage]], exaggerated breasts were part of the costuming for comically unattractive female characters, since in [[Roman comedy|classic Roman comedy]] women's roles were played by male actors [[drag (clothing)|in drag]].<ref>C.W. Marshall, ''The Stagecraft and Performance of Roman Comedy'' (Cambridge University Press, 2006), p. 65. In the ''[[Poenulus]]'' of Plautus (line 1416), a flute girl is dismissed as unattractive because both her cheeks and her breasts are overly full; puffing out one's cheeks while playing a wind instrument was considered ugly (as noted by [[Minerva]] herself in Ovid's ''Fasti'' 6.693–710). By contrast, in Plautus's ''Casina'' (line 848), a character exclaims ''edepol papillam bellulam'', "By [[Castor and Pollux#Italy and the Roman Empire|Pollux]], what a pretty little titty!"</ref>

While Greek epigrams describe ideal breasts,<ref>[[#Richlin1983|Richlin (1983)]], p. 55.</ref> Latin poets take limited interest in them, at least as compared to the modern focus on admiring and fondling a woman's breasts.<ref>[[#Richlin1983|Richlin (1983)]], p. 38.</ref> They are observed mainly as aspects of a woman's beauty or perfection of form, though Ovid finds them inviting to touch.<ref>Ovid, ''Amores'' 1.5.20, in a catalogue of his mistress's assets, remarks on "the outline of her nipples, ready to be squeezed." See also the catalogue of [[Philodemus]] 12 ([[Palatine Anthology]] 5.132); Andrew Dalby, ''Empires of Pleasures: Luxury and Indulgence in the Roman World'' (Routledge, 2000), pp. 24, 64–65, 263.</ref> In one poem celebrating a wedding, Catullus remarks on the bride's "tender nipples" ''(teneris ... papillis)'', which would keep a good husband sleeping with her; erotic appeal supports fidelity within marriage and leads to children and a long life together.<ref>Catullus 61.97–101, [[T.P. Wiseman]], ''Catullus and His World: A Reappraisal'' (Cambridge University Press, 1985, 2002), pp. 114–115.</ref>

[[File:A clay-baked breast. Roman votive offering Wellcome L0035905.jpg|thumb|left|Baked-clay votive breast]]
Because all infants were breastfed in antiquity, the breast was viewed primarily as an emblem of nurturing and of motherhood.<ref>Larissa Bonfante, "Nursing Mothers in Classical Art," in ''Naked Truths: Women, Sexuality, and Gender in Classical Art and Archaeology'' (Routledge, 1997, 2000), pp. 174ff., with many examples. The ideal characteristics of the breasts of a [[wet nurse]] ''(nutrix)'' are enumerated in the ''Gynaecology'' of [[Soranus of Ephesus|Soranus]] 2.18–20.</ref> ''[[Mastos|Mastoi]]'', breast-shaped drinking cups, and representations of breasts are among the votive offerings ''([[votum|vota]])'' found at sanctuaries of deities such as [[Diana (mythology)|Diana]] and [[Hercules]], sometimes having been dedicated by [[wet nurse]]s.<ref>Celia E. Schultz, ''Women's Religious Activity in the Roman Republic'' (University of North Carolina Press, 2006), pp. 54, 68, 101, 115</ref><ref>[[#Younger|Younger]], p. 36. Breast ''vota'', like representations of other body parts (compare [[milagro (votive)|milagro]]), can also be dedicated at healing sanctuaries as part of seeking a cure for an ailment of the breast, such as [[mastitis]] or various tumors the ancients diagnosed as "cancer."</ref> The breast-shaped cup may have a religious significance; the drinking of breast milk by an adult who is elderly or about to die symbolized potential rebirth in the afterlife.<ref>Anthony Corbeill, ''Nature Embodied: Gesture in Ancient Rome'' (Princeton University Press, 2004), pp. 101–103</ref><ref>[[#Younger|Younger]], pp. 35–36</ref><ref>Fritz Graf and Sarah Iles Johnston, ''Ritual Texts for the Afterlife: Orpheus and the Bacchic Gold Tablets'' (Routledge, 2007), pp. 128–129. Perhaps also a reference to the "[[Milky Way]]" as a path to the heavens.</ref> In the [[Etruscan mythology|Etruscan tradition]], the goddess [[Juno (mythology)|Juno]] ''([[Uni (mythology)|Uni]])'' offers her breast to Hercules as a sign that he may enter the ranks of the immortals.<ref name=":8">[[#Younger|Younger]], p. 35</ref><ref>Nancy Thomson de Grummond, ''Etruscan Myth, Sacred History, and Legend'' (University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, 2006), pp. 83–84.</ref> The religious meaning may underlie the story of how Pero offered breast milk to her elderly father when he was imprisoned and sentenced to death by starvation (see [[Roman Charity]]).<ref>[[Valerius Maximus]] 5.4.1.</ref> [[Pliny the Elder|Pliny]] records medicinal uses of breast milk, and ranks it as one of the most useful remedies, especially for ailments of the eyes and ears. Wrapping one's head in a bra was said to cure a headache.<ref>Pliny, ''Natural History'' 28.73, 123</ref><ref>[[#Hallett|Hallett]], pp. 204–205.</ref>

[[File:Affresco romano - Pompei - Micon e Pero.jpg|thumb|Pero offering her breast milk to her aged father in an act of "[[Roman Charity]]"]]
Baring the breasts is one of the gestures made by women, particularly mothers or nurses, to express mourning or as an appeal for mercy.<ref>Corbeill, ''Nature Embodied'', p. 87 ''et passim''. See for instance [[Seneca the Younger|Seneca]], ''[[Phaedra (Seneca)|Phaedra]]'' 247, ''Hercules Oetaeus'' 926. "One of the commonest literary motifs for mourning in ancient texts is women baring and beating their breasts," notes [[Alan Cameron (classical scholar)|Alan Cameron]], ''The Last Pagans of Rome'' (Oxford University Press, 2011), p. 725.</ref> The baring and beating of breasts ritually in grief was interpreted by [[Maurus Servius Honoratus|Servius]] as producing milk to feed the dead.<ref>Servius, note to ''[[Aeneid]]'' 5.78; Corbeill, ''Nature Embodied'', pp. 86–87.</ref> In Greek and Latin literature, mythological mothers sometimes expose their breasts in moments of extreme emotional duress to demand that their nurturing role be respected.<ref>Beth Cohen, "Divesting the Female Breast of Clothes in Classical Sculpture," in ''Naked Truths: Women, Sexuality, and Gender in Classical Art and Archaeology'' (Routledge, 1997), p. 69.</ref> Breasts exposed with such intensity held [[Apotropaic magic|apotropaic]] power.<ref>Claire L. Lyons and [[Ann Olga Koloski-Ostrow]], introduction to ''Naked Truths'', p. 10; Bonfante, "Nursing Mothers," pp. 187–188, relating it to the [[evil eye]] and the [[gaze]] of [[Medusa]]</ref><ref name=bonfante/> [[Julius Caesar]] indicates that the gesture had a similar significance in [[Celts|Celtic culture]]: during the [[siege of Avaricum]], the female heads of household ''(matres familiae)'' expose their breasts and extend their hands to ask that the women and children be spared.<ref>[[Julius Caesar]], ''[[Commentarii de Bello Gallico|Bellum Gallicum]]'' 7.47.5; G. Matherat, “Le première campagne de César contre les Bellovaques et le geste ''passis manibus''," in ''Hommages à Albert Grenier'' (Latomus, 1962), vol. 3.</ref> [[Tacitus]] notes [[Germanic peoples|Germanic]] women who exhorted their reluctant men to valorous battle by aggressively baring their breasts.<ref>[[Tacitus]], ''Germania'' 8.1; Bonfante, "Nursing Mothers," p. 187.</ref> Although in general "the gesture is meant to arouse pity rather than sexual desire", the beauty of the breasts so exposed is sometimes in evidence and remarked upon.<ref>[[Mary Lefkowitz]] and Maureen B. Fant, ''Women's Life in Greece and Rome'', p. 350, note 5. A Greek example is found in [[Euripides]], ''[[Hecuba (play)|Hecuba]]'' 557–565 when [[Polyxena]], about to become a [[human sacrifice]], shows her courage by exposing "breasts and chest as beautiful as a statue's."</ref>

Because women were normally portrayed clothed in art, bared breasts can signify vulnerability or erotic availability by choice, accident, or force. Baring a single breast was a visual motif of [[Classical Greek sculpture]], where among other situations, including seductions,<ref>Other situations include marking a female figure as an Amazon, as part of athletic attire, or for the purpose of nursing an infant.</ref> it often represented impending physical violence or rape.<ref>Cohen, "Divesting the Female Breast," p. 68ff.</ref> Some scholars have attempted to find a "code" in which exposing the right breast had an erotic significance, while the left breast signified nurturing.<ref>Cohen, "Divesting the Female Breast," p. 79.</ref> Although art produced by the Romans may imitate or directly draw on Greek conventions, during the [[Classical Greece|Classical period]] of Greek art images of women nursing were treated as animalistic or barbaric; by contrast, the coexisting [[Italic peoples|Italic]] tradition emphasized the breast as a focus of the mother–child relationship and as a source of female power.<ref>Bonfante, "Nursing Mothers," ''passim'' and conclusion on p. 188.</ref>

The [[erogenous]] power of the breast was not utterly neglected: in comparing sex with a woman to sex with a boy, a [[ancient Greek novel|Greek novel]] of the Roman Imperial era notes that "her breast when it is caressed provides its own particular pleasure".<ref>[[Achilles Tatius]], ''[[Leucippe and Clitophon]]'' 37.7, as excerpted by Lefkowitz and Fant, ''Women's Life in Greece and Rome'', p. 182.</ref> [[Propertius]] connects breast development with girls reaching an age to "[[ludus (ancient Rome)|play]]".<ref>''Necdum inclinatae prohibent te ludere mammae'', 2.15.21</ref><ref>[[Thomas Habinek]], ''The World of Roman Song: From Ritualized Speech to Social Order'' (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005), p. 114.</ref> [[Tibullus]] observes that a woman just might wear loose clothing so that her breasts "[[exhibitionism|flash]]" when she reclines at dinner.<ref>[[Tibullus]] 1.6.18; Dalby, ''Empire of Pleasures'', p. 263.</ref> An [[Hellenistic astrology|astrological tradition]] held that [[mammary intercourse]] was enjoyed by men born under the [[Conjunction (astronomy and astrology)|conjunction]] of Venus, Mercury, and Saturn.<ref>[[#Younger|Younger]], p. 20, citing [[Manetho]] 4.312.</ref> Even in the most sexually explicit Roman paintings, the breasts are sometimes covered by the ''strophium'' (breast band).<ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], p. 73</ref><ref name=":8"/> The women so depicted may be prostitutes, but it can be difficult to discern why an artist decides in a given scenario to portray the breasts covered or exposed.<ref>Examples throughout [[#Clarke|Clarke]].</ref>

===Female–female sex===
{{See also|History of lesbianism|Tribadism|Homosexuality in ancient Rome}}

Greek words for a woman who prefers sex with another woman include ''hetairistria'' (compare ''[[hetaira]]'', "courtesan" or "companion"), ''tribas'' (plural ''tribades''), and ''Lesbia''; Latin words include the [[loanword]] ''tribas'', ''fricatrix'' ("she who rubs"), and ''[[virago]]''.<ref>[[Bernadette Brooten|Bernadette J. Brooten]], ''Love between Women: Early Christian Responses to Female Homoeroticism'' (University of Chicago Press, 1996), p. 4.</ref> References to sex between women are infrequent in the Roman literature of the Republic and early [[Principate]]. Ovid, who advocates generally for a heterosexual lifestyle, finds it "a desire known to no one, freakish, novel ... among all animals no female is seized by desire for female"<ref>Ovid, ''Metamorphoses'' 9.727, 733–4, as cited in [[#Potter2009|Potter (2009)]], p. 346.</ref>—and yet Ovid's story of [[Iphis|Iphis and Ianthe]] in the ''Metamorphoses'' (9.666–797) is "the most extended surviving account in ancient literature of female-female desire."<ref>Jen H. Oliver, "''Oscula iungit nec moderata satis nec sic a virgine danda'': Ovid's Callisto Episode, Female Homoeroticism, and the Study of Ancient Sexuality," ''American Journal of Philology'' 136:2 (2015), p. 285.</ref> Ovid's narrative of [[Callisto (mythology)|Callisto]], a follower of [[Diana (mythology)|Diana]], the goddess who actively shunned the company of men, is rich with homoerotic implications, as Callisto is seduced by [[Jove]] only because he disguises himself as Diana.<ref>Olive, "Ovid's Callisto Episode," pp. 281–312, especially 309.</ref>

During the Roman Imperial era, sources for same-sex relations among women are more abundant, including in the form of love spells, medical writing, and texts on astrology and the interpretation of dreams.<ref>Brooten, ''Love between Women'', p. 1.</ref> A graffito from Pompeii ([[CIL 4.5296|''CIL'' 4.5296]]) expresses the desire of one woman for another:

<blockquote>
I wish I could hold to my neck and embrace the little arms, and bear kisses on the tender lips. Go on, doll, and trust your joys to the winds; believe me, light is the nature of men.<ref>The Latin indicates that the pronoun ''I'' is of [[grammatical gender|feminine gender]]; [[CIL 4.5296|''CIL'' 4.5296]], as cited in [[#Potter2009|Potter (2009)]], p. 347.</ref>
</blockquote>

[[File:Diana and Callisto by Pietro Liberi.jpg|thumb|Scenes of Diana and a woodland coterie, such as this ''Diana and Callisto'' (1658/59) on a theme [[Pietro Liberi]] often painted,<ref>Sotheby's, [https://www.sothebys.com/en/buy/auction/2021/old-master-paintings/diana-and-callisto|Old Masters and Portrait Miniatures lot 408]</ref> became opportunities in the [[classical tradition]] to explore fleshy female [[homosociality]]<ref>Olive, "Ovid's Callisto Episode," p. 305.</ref>]]
An early reference to same-sex relations among women as "lesbianism", owing to [[Sappho#Sexuality|Sappho of  Lesbos]], is found in [[Lucian]] (2nd century AD): "They say there are women like that in Lesbos, masculine-looking, but they don't want to give it up for men. Instead, they consort with women, just like men."<ref>Lucian, ''Dialogues of the Courtesans'' 5.</ref>

Since Romans thought a sex act required an active or dominant partner who was [[#Phallic sexuality|"phallic"]], male writers imagined that in lesbian sex one of the women would use a [[dildo]] or have an exceptionally large clitoris for penetration, and that she would be the one experiencing pleasure.<ref>Jonathan Walters, "Invading the Roman Body: Manliness and Impenetrability in Roman Thought," pp. 30–31, and Pamela Gordon, "The Lover's Voice in ''Heroides'' 15: Or, Why Is Sappho a Man?," p. 283, both in [[#Hallett|Hallett]]; [[#Fredrick|Fredrick]], p. 168.</ref> The dildo is rarely mentioned in Roman sources, but was a popular comic item in Classical Greek literature and art.<ref>[[#Potter2009|Potter (2009)]], p. 351.</ref> Martial describes lesbians as having outsized sexual appetites and performing penetrative sex on both women and boys.<ref>Martial 1.90 and 7.67, 50; [[#Potter2009|Potter (2009)]], p. 347</ref> Imperial portrayals of women who sodomize boys, drink and eat like men, and engage in vigorous physical regimens, may reflect cultural anxieties about the growing independence of Roman women.<ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], p. 228.</ref>

===Rape===

====Mythology of rape====
[[File:Sandro Botticelli 078.jpg|thumb|[[Botticelli]]'s ''Death of Lucretia'' (''c.'' 1500): in Roman legend, Lucretia's rape and suicide brought about the overthrow of the monarchy and the formation of the Roman Republic]]
The rape of women is a pervasive theme in the [[Roman mythology|myths and legends of early Rome]]. The legendary founders [[Romulus and Remus]] were born from the rape of the Vestal [[Rhea Silvia]] by the god [[Mars (mythology)|Mars]].<ref>Livy 1.3.11–4.3.</ref> Romulus and his "band of freebooters" can transform their all-male settlement into a city only by [[The Rape of the Sabine Women|the "rape" of the Sabine women]], that is, by forcibly [[bride abduction|abducting]] the daughters of their [[Sabines|Sabine]] neighbors to take as wives. The overthrow of the [[Kings of Rome|Roman monarchy]] and the establishment of the Republic was precipitated by the rape of the much-admired [[Lucretia]] by [[Sextus Tarquinius]], the king's son. The legend crystallizes the Roman view of unchecked ''libido'' as a form of tyranny.<ref>[[#Kuttner|Kuttner]], p. 348.</ref>

The [[Augustan literature (ancient Rome)|Augustan]] historian [[Livy]] seems "embarrassed" by the rape motif of early Roman history, and emphasizes the redeeming political dimension of these events.<ref>[[Mary Beard (classicist)|Mary Beard]], J.A. North, and S.R.F. Price, ''Religions of Rome: A History'' (Cambridge University Press, 1998), vol. 1, pp. 1–10, as cited and elaborated by Phyllis Culham, "Women in the Roman Republic," in ''The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic'' (Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 158.</ref> [[#Epicurean sexuality|Lucretius]] condemns rape as a primitive behavior outside the bounds of an advanced civilization,<ref>[[#Fredrick|Fredrick]], p. 105.</ref> describing it as "a man's use of violent force and imposition of sexual impulse".<ref>Lucretius, ''De rerum natura'' 5.964: ''Violenta viri vis atque impensa libido.''</ref>

====Rape and the law====
[[Roman law]] recognized rape as a crime: the rape victim was not guilty of anything.<ref>[[#Staples|Staples]], p. 81.</ref> Intercourse by force or compulsion ''(vis)'', even if it took place under circumstances that were otherwise unlawful for a woman (see [[#Moral and legal concepts|"Moral and legal concepts" above]]), left the woman legally without blame.<ref>[[#Staples|Staples]], p. 82</ref><ref>[[#Gardner|Gardner]], pp. 118ff.</ref> The official position under [[Diocletian]] (reigned 284–305&nbsp;AD) held that:<ref name="gardner120">[[#Gardner|Gardner]], p. 120.</ref>

<blockquote>
The laws punish the foul wickedness of those who prostitute their modesty to the lusts of others, but they do not attach blame to those who are compelled to ''[[stuprum]]'' by force, since it has, moreover, been quite properly decided that their reputations are unharmed and that they are not prohibited from marriage to others.<ref>''Digest'' 9.9.20.</ref>
</blockquote>

[[File:Sarcofago di marte e rea silvia, 225-230 dc ca. 01.jpg|thumb|300px|Rape was embedded in the most familiar founding myth of Rome: [[Romulus and Remus]] were born from the rape of [[Rhea Silvia]] by the god [[Mars (mythology)|Mars]] ([[Ancient Roman sarcophagi|Roman sarcophagus]], 3rd century CE)]]

Although literary sources from the Republican era make it clear that rape was wrong and severely penalized, the [[statute]]s under which it might be charged as a crime are unknown until passage of the ''[[Lex Julia|Lex Iulia de vi publica]]'', dating probably to the dictatorship of Julius Caesar in the 40s&nbsp;BC.<ref name="gardner118">[[#Gardner|Gardner]], p. 118.</ref> Rome had no state prosecutors; cases could be prosecuted by any citizen with the legal expertise and speaking ability to do so. Since emancipated women were allowed to bring criminal prosecutions in the Republic,<ref>A law passed sometime between 80 and 50&nbsp;BC banned women from acting as prosecutors in the courtroom; [[Valerius Maximus]] 8.3.1; Richard A. Bauman, ''Women and Politics in Ancient Rome'' (Routledge, 1992, 1994), p. 50; Joseph Farrell, ''Latin Language and Latin Culture'' (Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 74–75; Michael C. Alexander, ''Trials in the Late Roman Republic, 149–50&nbsp;BC'' (University of Toronto Press, 1990), p. 180.</ref> it is conceivable that a rape victim could have brought charges against her rapist herself. Otherwise, the case could be prosecuted by her father or husband, or by anyone who saw fit to do so. There was no [[statute of limitations]] for rape; by contrast [[Marriage in ancient Rome#Adultery|adultery]], which was criminalized under [[Augustus]], had to be prosecuted within five years.<ref name="gardner118"/> Rape was a capital crime.<ref name="gardner118"/>

As a matter of law, rape could be committed only against a citizen in good standing. A woman who worked as a prostitute or entertainer lost her social standing and became ''[[#Pleasure and infamy|infamis]]''; by making her body publicly available, she had in effect surrendered her right to be protected from sexual abuse or physical violence.<ref name=g119>[[#Gardner|Gardner]], p. 119</ref><ref name=":4">[[#McGinn1998|McGinn (1998)]], p. 326.</ref> Cicero defended a client whose misdeeds included the gang rape of an actress on the grounds that young men took customary license with entertainers.<ref>Cicero, ''Pro Planco'' 30</ref><ref name=":4"/><ref>Roy K. Olson, ''Ars Amatoria, Book 3'' (Cambridge University Press, 2003), p. 386; J.P. Toner, ''Leisure and Ancient Rome'' (Blackwell, 1995), p. 68.</ref> The rape of a slave could be prosecuted only as damage to her owner's property, under the ''[[Lex Aquilia]]''.<ref name="prostitution314">[[#McGinn1998|McGinn (1998)]], p. 314</ref><ref name=g119/> Consent would have been an issue in rape cases only rarely; if the accused argued that the woman had consented, he could still be charged with committing the more general sex crime of ''stuprum'' against a citizen, since male sexual freedom was limited to prostitutes or slaves. If rape against a married woman could not be proven, the Augustan legislation criminalizing adultery would make the man liable to a charge of ''adulterium'', criminal adultery, though a charge of either adultery or ''stuprum'' without force would implicate the woman as well.<ref name="gardner2">[[#Gardner|Gardner]], pp. 120–121.</ref> An acquittal for rape, as with any other crime, would open the prosecutor to a retaliatory charge of ''[[calumnia (Roman law)|calumnia]]'', malicious prosecution.<ref>[[#Gardner|Gardner]], p. 121.</ref> The prosecution of rape might also be hindered by psychological and social pressures, such as embarrassment or a reluctance to expose one's private life.<ref name="gardner2"/>

Attitudes toward rape changed when the Empire became Christianized. [[Augustine of Hippo|St. Augustine]] interpreted Lucretia's suicide as a possible admission that she had secretly encouraged the rapist,<ref group="n">[[#Staples|Staples]], p. 164, citing Norman Bryson, "Two Narratives of Rape in the Visual Arts: Lucretia and the Sabine Women," in ''Rape'' (Blackwell, 1986), p. 199. Augustine's interpretation of the rape of Lucretia (in ''City of God'' 1.19) has generated a substantial body of criticism, starting with [[Machiavelli]]'s satire. In ''Augustine of Hippo: A Biography'' (Faber, 1967), [[Peter Brown (historian)|Peter Brown]] characterized this section of Augustine's work as his most vituperative attack on Roman ideals of virtue. See also Carol J. Adams and Marie M. Fortune, ''Violence against Women and Children: A Christian Theological Sourcebook'' (Continuum, 1995), p. 219ff.; Melissa M. Matthes, ''The Rape of Lucretia and the Founding of Republics'' (Pennsylvania State University Press, 2000), p. 68ff. (also on Machiavelli); Virginia Burrus, ''Saving Shame: Martyrs, Saints, and Other Abject Subjects'' (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008), p. 125ff.; Amy Greenstadt, ''Rape and the Rise of the Author: Gendering Intention in Early Modern England'' (Ashgate, 2009), p. 71; Melissa E. Sanchez, ''Erotic Subjects: The Sexuality of Politics in Early Modern English Literature'' (Oxford University Press, 2011), p. 93ff. Augustine defines sexual integrity ''(pudicitia)'' as a purely spiritual quality that physical defilement cannot taint; as indicated throughout this article, the Romans viewed rape and other forms of ''stuprum'' within a political context as crimes against the citizen's liberty.</ref> and [[Christian apologists]] regarded her as having committed the sin of involuntary sexual pleasure.<ref>[[#Staples|Staples]], p. 164.</ref> The first Christian emperor [[Constantine the Great|Constantine]] redefined rape as a public offense rather than as a private wrong.<ref>James A. Brundage, ''Law, Sex, and Christian Society in Medieval Europe'' (University of Chicago Press, 1987, 1990), p. 107.</ref> Earlier Roman law had blurred the line between abduction and [[elopement]], since in either case it was the right of the ''paterfamilias'' to give or withhold his consent to his daughter's marriage that had been violated. The word ''raptus'' thus could refer to a successful seduction as well as abduction or rape. If the girl consented, Constantine ordered that she be punished along with the male "abductor" by being burnt alive. If she had not consented, she was still considered an accomplice, "on the grounds that she could have saved herself by screaming for help".<ref name="gardner120"/> As a participant to the rape, she was punished under law by being disinherited, regardless of the wishes of her family.<ref>Charles Matson Odahl, ''Constantine and the Christian Empire'' (Routledge, 2004), p. 179; Timothy David Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'' (Harvard University Press, 1981), p. 220; Gillian Clark, ''Women in Late Antiquity: Pagan and Christian Lifestyles'' (Oxford University Press, 1993), pp. 36–37, characterizing Constantine's law as "unusually dramatic even for him."</ref> Even if she and her family consented to a marriage as the result of an elopement, the marriage was legally void. In the Republic and the pre-Christian Empire, the consequences of an abduction or an elopement had been up to the couple and their families.<ref>[[Theodosian Code]] 9.24.1.2–3; ''Cod.'' 9.13.1; Brundage, ''Law, Sex, and Christian Society'', p. 107.</ref>

==Sexuality and children==
[[File:Roman boy wearing bulla.jpg|thumb|Roman boy wearing a ''[[bulla (amulet)|bulla]]'', which contained a phallic charm]]

Both male and female freeborn children wore the ''[[toga praetexta]]'', a purple-bordered garment that marked its wearer as having "inviolable" status.<ref>The purple border appeared also on the togas of magistrates whose duties including presiding over sacrifices, on the toga worn by a mourning son when he carried out a parent's [[Roman funerals and burial|funeral rites]], and on the veils of the [[Vestal Virgins]]; Judith Lynn Sebesta, "Women's Costume and Feminine Civic Morality in Augustan Rome," ''Gender & History'' 9.3 (1997), p. 532, and "Symbolism in the Costume of the Roman Woman," p. 47.</ref> An oath could be sworn upon the "sacred ''praetexta''", a marker of how "we make sacred and venerable the weakness of childhood".<ref>In a declamation attributed to Quintilian, ''Declamatio minor'' [https://books.google.com/books?id=NWxftzyjR8AC&pg=PA224&lpg=PA224&dq=%22quo+infirmitatem+pueritiae+sacram+facimus%22&source=bl&ots=gLdJLv0axQ&sig=3TGMCjQgQV8-0xM7d6Ykno14kAU&hl=en&ei=4c4pTuv7D6Xl0QHpwaTTCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CBcQ6AEwATgK#v=onepage&q=%22quo%20infirmitatem%20pueritiae%20sacram%20facimus%22&f=false 340.13] as quoted by Sebesta, "Women's Costume," p. 532. [[Persius]], ''Satire'' 5.30–31, calls the ''praetexta'' the guardian ''(custos)'' of childhood.</ref> It was religiously impermissible ''([[nefas]])'' to use obscene language in front of those wearing the ''praetexta'',<ref>''Praetextatis nefas sit obsceno verbo uti'': [[Sextus Pompeius Festus|Festus]] 282–283&nbsp;L = 245&nbsp;M).</ref> and [[Cato the Elder|Cato]] claimed that in front of his son he tried to speak as though [[Vestal Virgin|Vestal Virgins]] were present.<ref name=":2"/><ref>[[#Williams|Williams]], p. 69.</ref>

Freeborn Roman boys also wore an [[apotropaic]] amulet called the ''[[Bulla (amulet)|bulla]]'' which incorporated a phallic [[talisman]] ''([[fascinum]])'' inside a locket of gold, silver, or bronze, or in a leather pouch.<ref>Pliny, ''Natural History'' 28.29; Varro, ''De lingua latina'' 7.97</ref><ref>[[#Habinek|Habinek]], p. 166</ref><ref>Judith Lynn Sebesta, "Symbolism in the Costume of the Roman Woman," in ''The World of Roman Costume'' (University of Wisconsin Press, 2001), p. 47.</ref> In addition to its magical function, the ''bulla'' would have been a visible warning that the boy was sexually off-limits.<ref>[[Plutarch]], ''Moralia'' 288a</ref><ref name=":6"/><ref>[[#Richlin1993|Richlin (1993)]], pp. 545–546.</ref> The equivalent for the girl was the ''[[Lunula (amulet)|lunula]]'', a crescent moon amulet.<ref>Sebesta, "Symbolism in the Costume of the Roman Woman," pp. 47, 51. There is only slight and ambiguous evidence that they too might wear a ''bulla'', at [[Plautus]], ''Rudens'' 1194.</ref>

There were laws protecting freeborn children from [[sexual predator]]s,<ref name=":1"/><ref>[[Paulus (jurist)|Paulus]], ''Digest'' 47.11.1.2.</ref> and the [[#The rape of men|rape of a freeborn boy]] was a capital crime; this severity was directed at protecting the integrity of the young citizen.<ref>[[#Fantham|Fantham]], p. 130</ref> Fictional license was not a defense; [[Valerius Maximus]] reports that a poetic boast of seducing a ''puer praetextatus'' ("praetextate boy") and a freeborn virgin ''(ingenua virgo)'' was used in court to impugn a prosecutor's [[moral authority]].<ref>Valerius Maximus 8.1 absol. 8, as cited by Kelly Olson, "The Appearance of the Young Roman Girl," in ''Roman Dress and the Fabrics of Roman Culture'', p. 142.</ref> In denouncing the debaucheries of [[Quintus Apronius]], Cicero builds to the worst offence: Apronius danced naked at a banquet in front of a boy still of an age to wear the ''praetexta''.<ref>Cicero, ''Verrine'' 3.23.</ref> Although children were taken to dinner parties ''([[Symposium|convivia]])'' to accustom them to proper adult social behavior, [[Quintilian]] scolds parents of his day for being poor role models: they parade their mistresses and male concubines and behave indiscreetly even when their children are present, and think it is cute when their children say things that are age-inappropriate. Quintilian regards this misbehavior as a sign of general moral decline.<ref>Quintiltian, ''Institution Oratoria'' 1.2.7–8; Matthew B. Roller, ''Dining Posture in Ancient Rome'' (Princeton University Press, 2006), p. 160.</ref> At weddings, however, boys were by ancient custom given license to speak obscenely, peppering the new couple with dirty jokes, as humor and laughter were thought to promote fertility.<ref>Robinson Ellis, ''A Commentary to Catullus'' (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1876), p. 180, in reference to Catullus, ''Carmen'' 61.</ref>

Protections applied only to freeborn children, not those born to slaves, sold into slavery, or taken captive in war. The social acceptance of [[Greek love#Ancient Rome|pederasty among the Romans]] was focused on the exploitation of young male slaves or prostitutes by men of the upper classes.<ref name="auto2"/><ref>Elizabeth Manwell, "Gender and Masculinity," in ''A Companion to Catullus'' (Blackwell, 2007), p. 118.</ref>

===Rites of passage===
Adolescents in ritual preparation to transition to adult status wore the ''tunica recta'', the "upright tunic", so called because it was woven ritually on the type of upright loom that was the earliest used by Romans.<ref name="sebesta">Sebesta, "Women's Costume," p. 533.</ref> The tunic, worn by both youths and maidens, may have had the purple band of inviolability, though this is unclear from the evidence.<ref name="sebesta"/> Girls wove their own ''tunica recta''.<ref name="sebesta1">Sebesta, "Women's Costume," p. 534.</ref>

The puberty ritual for the young male involved shaving his first beard and taking off his ''[[Bulla (amulet)|bulla]]'', which he dedicated to the household gods, the [[Lares]].<ref>[[Persius]] 5.30–31.</ref> He assumed the ''[[toga virilis]]'' ("toga of manhood"), was enrolled as a citizen on the census, and soon began his military service.<ref>Larissa Bonfante, introduction to ''The World of Roman Costume'', p. 7; Shelley Stone, "The Toga: From National to Ceremonial Costume," in ''The World of Roman Costume'', p. 41; Sebesta, "Women's Costume," p. 533. After the Augustan building program, the rites were held at the new Temple of [[Mars (mythology)#Mars Ultor|Mars Ultor]] in the [[Forum Augustum]]: Dominic Montserrat, "Reading Gender in the Roman World," in ''Experiencing Rome: Culture, Identity, and Power in the Roman Empire'' (Routledge, 2000), p. 170.</ref> Traditionally, the ceremony was held on the [[Liberalia]], the festival in honor of the god [[Liber]], who embodied both political and sexual liberty.<ref>Other dates could be chosen for the ceremony. See [[#Staples|Staples]], p. 89; George, "The 'Dark Side' of the Toga," p. 55; Propertius 3.15.3–6; Ovid, ''Fasti'' 3.777–778.</ref> Following his [[rite of passage]], the young male citizen was permitted the avenues of sexual activity that were generally acceptable for Roman men of his social rank.<ref name="sebesta1"/> Often a young man would be introduced to heterosexual intercourse by an experienced female prostitute.<ref>[[#Richlin1993|Richlin (1993)]], p. 535, citing Martial 11.78.</ref>

[[File:Roman marriage vows.jpg|thumb|Roman couple joining hands; the knot in a bride's [[Zone (vestment)|belt]], symbolizing that her husband was "belted and bound" to her, was to be untied by him on the wedding night (from a 4th century sarcophagus)<ref>''Cinctus vinctusque'', according to [[Sextus Pompeius Festus|Festus]] 55 (edition of Lindsay); Karen K. Hersch, ''The Roman Wedding: Ritual and Meaning in Antiquity'' (Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 101, 110, 211 .</ref>]]
Roman women were expected to remain virgins until marriage; the higher a girl's social rank, the earlier she was likely to become [[betrothal|betrothed]] and married.<ref>Judith P. Hallett, ''Fathers and Daughters in Roman Society: Women and the Elite Family'' (Princeton University Press, 1984), 142; Beryl Rawson, "The Roman Family in Italy" (Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 21;</ref> The usual age of betrothal for upper classes girls was 14, but for [[Patrician (ancient Rome)|patricians]] as early as 12. Weddings were often postponed until the girl was considered mature enough. The wedding ceremony was in part a rite of passage for the bride, as Rome lacked the elaborate female puberty rituals of ancient Greece.<ref>Girls coming of age [[Glossary of ancient Roman religion#votum|dedicated]] their dolls to [[Diana (mythology)|Diana]], the goddess most concerned with girlhood, or to [[Venus (mythology)|Venus]] when they were preparing for marriage; Beryl Rawson, ''Children and Childhood in Roman Italy'' (Oxford University Press, 2003), p. 48 on Diana; p. 128, citing [[Persius]] 2.70 and the related [[scholion]]; p. 145 on comparison with Greece.</ref> On the night before the wedding, the bride bound up her hair with a yellow hairnet she had woven. The confining of her hair signified the harnessing of her sexuality within marriage. Her weaving of the ''tunica recta'' and the hairnet demonstrated her skill and her capacity for acting in the traditional matron's role as ''custos domi'', "guardian of the house".<ref>Sebesta, "Women's Costume," pp. 529, 534, 538.</ref> On her wedding day, she belted her tunic with the ''cingulum'', made of ewe wool to symbolize fertility, and tied with the "[[Hercules knot|knot of Hercules]]", which was supposed to be difficult to untie.<ref>Sebesta, "Women's Costume," pp. 534–535; Festus 55L on the ''nodus Herculaneus'', which was used for its apotropaic powers on jewelry as well. The Roman [[Hercules]] was a giver of fertility and a great scatterer of seed: he fathered, according to Verrius Flaccus, seventy children.</ref> The knot symbolized wifely chastity, in that it was to be untied only by her husband, but the ''cingulum'' also symbolized that the groom was bound to his wife.<ref>''Cinctus vinctusque'', according to [[Sextus Pompeius Festus|Festus]] 55 (edition of Lindsay); Karen K. Hersch, ''The Roman Wedding: Ritual and Meaning in Antiquity'' (Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 101, 110, 211.</ref> The bride's hair was ritually styled in "six tresses" ''(seni crines)'', and she was veiled until uncovered by her husband at the end of the ceremony, a ritual of surrendering her virginity to him.<ref>Sebesta, "Women's Costume," p. 535.</ref>

==Sex, marriage, and society==
===Marital sex===
{{multiple image
 | direction = vertical
   | align = right
  | width     = 250
 | image_style = border:none;
 | image1    = Casa della Farnesina - Cubiculum D - Right wall - Left Side.jpg
   | alt1      = 
   | caption1  = Newlyweds<ref>The interpretation of the couple as newlyweds is based on the woman's attire; [[#Clarke|Clarke]], pp. 99–101.</ref> attended by a servant: the bride remains fully clothed and demur (''c.'' 19&nbsp;BC, from the bedroom wall of a villa excavated in [[Trastevere]])
   | image2    = Casa della Farnesina - Cubiculum D - Right wall - Right Side.jpg
   | alt2      = 
   | caption2  = In an accompanying scene, the bride shows her growing agency as a nude slave looks on
   | footer    = 
   }}

Because men could enjoy sexual relations outside marriage with relative impunity, it has sometimes been assumed that satisfying sex was not an expectation of Roman marriage.<ref>Susan Dixon, ''The Roman Family'' (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992), pp. 86–88.</ref> The jurist [[Ulpian]] noted that "it is not sexual intercourse that makes a marriage but rather marital affection",<ref>''Non enim coitus matrimonium facit, sed maritalis affectio'', Ulpian, ''Ulpianus libro trigesimo tertio ad Sabinum'', ''Digest'' 24.1.32.13, as cited by Bruce W. Frier and Thomas A.J. McGinn, ''A Casebook on Family Law'' (Oxford University Press, 2004), p. 49.</ref> but the warnings by moralists and philosophers against a preoccupation with sex within marriage recognize the potential for marital passion.<ref>Dixon, ''The Roman Family'', pp. 86–88.</ref> While having children was a primary goal of marriage, other social and familial bonds were enhanced, not excluding personal companionship and sexual pleasure between husband and wife, as indicated by marriages involving women past their childbearing years.<ref>Beryl Rawson, "Finding Roman Women," in ''A Companion to the Roman Republic'' (Blackwell, 2010), p. 338.</ref>

Sexual intimacy between a married couple was a private matter, and not usually the subject of literature.<ref>James A. Brundage, ''Law, Sex, and Christian Society in Medieval Europe'' (University of Chicago Press, 1987, 1990), p. 22, citing Philippe Ariès, "L'amour dans le mariage," in ''Sexualités occidentales'', École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Centre d'Études Transdisciplinaires, Communications 35 (Paris: Seuil, 1982), p. 121</ref><ref name="auto5">[[#Potter2009|Potter (2009)]], p. 350.</ref> An exception was the [[epithalamium]], a genre of poetry that celebrated a wedding. A wedding hymn by Catullus, for instance, praises the love goddess Venus because "nothing is possible without you".<ref>Catullus, ''Carmen'' 61: ''nil potest sine te Venus''.</ref> Ovid, whose love poetry early in his career was directed at fictional mistresses, wrote elegies during his exile in which he longed for his wife.<ref name="family87">Dixon, ''The Roman Family'', p. 87.</ref> Among the [[Epistulae (Pliny)|collected letters]] of [[Pliny the Younger|Pliny ''Minor'']] is one he writes about his feelings for his wife:

<blockquote>
I am seized by an unbelievable longing for you. The reason is above all my love, but secondarily the fact that we are not used to being apart. This is why I spend the greater part of the night haunted by your image; this is why from time to time my feet lead me (the right expression!) of their own accord to your room at the times I was accustomed to frequent you; this is why, in short, I retreat, morbid and disconsolate, like an [[paraklausithyron|excluded lover from an unwelcoming doorway]].
</blockquote>

Pliny adopts the rhetoric of love poetry, conventionally directed at an illicit or hard-to-attain lover, as appropriate for expressing his wedded desire.<ref name="family87"/>

[[File:Bassorilievo con scfena erotica, da pompei VII, 7, 18, 50 dc ca., 27714.JPG|thumb|upright|The woman "riding" in a marble bas-relief from Pompeii (National Archaeological Museum, Naples) 1st century CE]]

The [[Troy|Trojan]] royal couple [[Hector]] and [[Andromache]] became a mythological [[Trope (literature)|trope]] of wedded sex. Latin love elegy focuses on their sex life rather than the tragic end of their marriage with Hector's death at the hands of [[Achilles]].<ref>[[Propertius]], 2.22 B, 31–34 Heyworth; Ovid, ''Amores'' 1.9.35–36, ''Ars Amatoria'' 2.709–710 and 3.107–110, ''Heroides'' 5.107; [[Barbara Graziosi]] and Johannes Haubold, ''Homer: Iliad Book VI'' (Cambridge University Press, 2010), p. 52. See also [[Martial]] 11.104.13–14, where the couple's lovemaking is so intensely erotic that it drives the household slaves to [[#Masturbation|masturbate]].</ref> They were known for the "woman on top" position, with a verb suggesting that the woman "rides" the man like a horse.<ref>Helen King, "Sowing the Field: Greek and Roman Sexology," in ''Sexual Knowledge, Sexual Science: The History of Attitudes to Sexuality'' (Cambridge University Press, 1994), p. 38.</ref> In general, Hector was portrayed as markedly heterosexual<ref>William Armstrong Percy III, "Reconsiderations about Greek Homosexualities," in ''Same-Sex Desire and Love in Greco-Roman Antiquity,'' p. 20.</ref> and an exemplary husband.<ref>Graziosi and Haubold, ''Homer'', p. 52.</ref>

====Wedding night====
{{See also|Marriage in ancient Rome}}
An epithalamium by Catullus<ref>Catullus, ''Carmen'' 61.</ref> paints the wedding night as a time of ripe eroticism, spiced with [[Fescennine Verses|humorous and bawdy songs]] from the guests. "Look inside," the poet advises the bride, who burns with an "intimate flame", "where your man lies on the richly arrayed bed, completely available to you". The husband is reminded that "good Venus" has blessed him, since he can now desire openly what he desires, and need not conceal a "good love". The couple is encouraged to enjoy themselves as they please ''(ludite ut lubet)''; the goal is to produce children soon.

A pair of paintings in a bedroom of the [[Casa della Farnesina]] has been interpreted as "a narrative of the modest bride becoming the immodest lover—perhaps fulfilling a ribald male fantasy".<ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], pp. 99–104, quotation pp. 103–104.</ref>

====Fidelity and adultery====
[[File:Ares e Afrodite.JPG|thumb|The mythological adultery of Venus and Mars, here attended by Cupid, was a popular subject for painting]]
{{For|the legal aspects|Marriage in ancient Rome#Adultery{{!}}Adultery in ancient Rome}}

Some literary passages suggest that a newlywed might break off his outside sexual relations for a time and focus on bonding with his wife in the hope of starting a family.<ref>For example, Catullus 61.123, where a ''concubinus'', a male concubine, expects that his master's wedding will cause him to be abandoned; James L. Butrica, "Some Myths and Anomalies in the Study of Roman Sexuality," in ''Same-Sex Desire and Love in Greco-Roman Antiquity'', pp. 218, 224.</ref> Some Stoics maintained that marital fidelity was as much a virtue for men as for women (see [[#Stoic sexual morality|"Stoic sexual morality" above]]). Legally, however, a Roman husband did not commit adultery when he had sex outside marriage as long as his partner was considered sexually available; sexual misconduct ''([[stuprum]])'' was adultery depending on the status of a female partner. A character in a play by [[Plautus]] expresses a man's sexual freedom in comic terms:

<blockquote>
No one prohibits anyone from going down the public way ''(publica via)''; as long as you do not make a path through [[trespass to land|posted land]], as long as you hold off from brides, single women, maidens, the youth and free boys, love whatever you want.<ref>[[Plautus]], ''Curculio'' 35–38. The passage is something of a topos of Roman sexuality; in addition to Richlin (following), see [[#Fantham|Fantham]], p. 123.</ref>
</blockquote>

A married or marriageable woman and young male citizens are off-limits, just as if they were the property of someone else,<ref name="auto4"/> and in fact adultery as a crime was committed contrary to the rights of the ''paterfamilias'' to control his household.<ref>[[#Fantham|Fantham]], p. 125.</ref> For a man, adultery was a sexual offense committed with a woman who was neither his wife nor a permissible partner such as a [[Prostitution in ancient Rome|prostitute]] or [[Slavery in ancient Rome|slave]],<ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.2307/284457 |jstor=284457 |title=Concubinage and the Lex Iulia on Adultery |journal=Transactions of the American Philological Association |volume=121 |pages=335–375 (342)|year=1991 |last1=McGinn |first1=Thomas A. J. }}</ref> in effect when his female partner was another man's wife or his unmarried daughter.<ref>[[#Nussbaum|Nussbaum]], p. 305.</ref> The later jurists emphasize that ''adulterium'' in the strict sense was committed with a married woman.<ref>[[#Fantham|Fantham]], p. 124, citing [[Papinian]], ''De adulteriis'' I and [[Modestinus]], ''Liber Regularum'' I.</ref>

For a married woman, no infidelity was acceptable, and first-time brides were expected to be virgins.<ref>Judith P. Hallett, ''Fathers and Daughters in Roman Society: Women and the Elite Family'' (Princeton University Press, 1984), 142.</ref> According to [[Cato the Elder|Cato]] (2nd century BC), a husband had an ancient right ''([[ius]])'' to kill his wife if he caught her in the act of adultery, but if this "right" existed, it was a matter of custom and not statute law.<ref>Susan Dixon, ''The Roman Family'' (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992), p. 202.</ref> In the Republic, adultery was normally considered a private matter for families to deal with, not a serious criminal offense requiring the attention of the courts.<ref>[[#Cantarella|Cantarella]], p. 104</ref><ref>[[#Edwards|Edwards]], pp. 34–35</ref><ref>[[#Nussbaum|Nussbaum]], p. 305, noting that custom "allowed much latitude for personal negotiation and gradual social change."</ref> No source records the justified killing of a woman for adultery by either a father or husband during the Republican era, though adultery was grounds for divorce.<ref>[[#Edwards|Edwards]], p. 38.</ref>

[[File:Fresco - 1ab Pompeii.jpg|thumb|right|Wall painting from Pompeii (50–79 CE)]]
Following the [[Crisis of the Roman Republic|collapse of the Republic]], moral legislation became part of the new political order under Rome's first emperor, [[Augustus]]. Laws pertaining to adultery passed in 18&nbsp;BC were part of his program to restore the ''[[mos maiorum]]'', traditional [[social norms]], while consolidating his political authority and codifying a more rigid [[social class in ancient Rome|social hierarchy]] in the wake of the recent [[Roman civil wars|civil wars]]. The appeal to old-fashioned values cloaked the radical overthrow of the Republic's participatory political institutions by top-down, one-man rule.<ref>[[#Hallett|Hallett]], pp. 34ff., 41–42, 67, 89–90.</ref> The ''[[Lex Iulia#Moral legislation of Augustus|Lex Iulia de adulteriis]]'' ("Julian Law concerning acts of adultery") was directed at punishing married women who engaged in extra-marital affairs. Scholars have often assumed that the ''Lex Iulia'' was meant to address a virulent outbreak of adultery in the Late Republic. An [[androcentric]] perspective in the early 20th century held that the ''Lex Iulia'' had been "a very necessary check upon the growing independence and recklessness of women".<ref>P.E. Corbett, ''The Roman Law of Marriage'' (1930), as cited by [[#Edwards|Edwards]], p. 35.</ref> A more sympathetic view in the late 20th to early 21st century saw love affairs as a way for the intelligent, independent women of the elite to form emotionally meaningful relationships outside marriages arranged for political purposes.<ref>Beryl Rawson, ''The Family in Ancient Rome'' (Cornell University Press, 1987), p. 27, as cited by [[#Edwards|Edwards]], pp. 35–36.</ref> It is possible, however, that no such epidemic of adultery even existed; the law should perhaps be understood not as addressing a real problem that threatened society, but as one of the instruments of social control exercised by Augustus that cast the state, and by extension himself, in the role of ''[[paterfamilias]]'' to all Rome.<ref>[[#Edwards|Edwards]], pp. 34–36.</ref>

Personal anxieties about infidelity, within marriage or not, are reflected in magic spells intended to "fix" ''([[defixiones]])'' or bind the other person's erotic attachment.<ref>Matthew W. Dickie, ''Magic and Magicians in the Greco–Roman World'' (Routledge, 2003), p. 36. ''Defixiones'' are also known as [[curse tablets]]; erotic prohibitions are only one form of ''defixio''.</ref> Spells were also available for interrogating the beloved about fidelity. One [[Greek Magical Papyri|magical papyrus]] from [[Roman Egypt]] recommends placing the heart of a [[hoopoe#Relationship with humans|hoopoe]] on a sleeping woman's [[#Female genitals|genitals]] to induce truthful answers; another says that the tongue of a hen placed on her lips or breast will cause her to reveal the name of the man she loves.<ref>Dickie, ''Magic and Magicians'', p. 116.</ref>

Literature of the Late Republic and [[Principate]], particularly the satires of [[Horace]] and [[Juvenal]], offer various depictions, or perhaps fantasies, of how a wronged husband might subject his wife's lover to humiliation and punishment. In these literary treatments, the adulterer is castrated, beaten, raped by the husband himself or his slaves, or penetrated anally with a [[Red mullet|mullet]], a type of prized fish cultivated by elite Romans as a leisure activity ''(otium)''. References to such acts do not appear in the letters of [[Cicero]] nor the histories of [[Tacitus]], and may be fictional exaggerations.<ref>"The men who people the pages of Cicero and Tacitus do not burst into their wives' bedrooms to take violent revenge (even when license was granted by the law)," notes [[#Edwards|Edwards]], pp. 55–56.</ref> [[Ovid]] makes fun of the jealous husband as lacking in sophistication: "The man who's excessively wounded by his wife's adulterous affairs is a hick."<ref>[[#Edwards|Edwards]], p. 56, citing Ovid, ''Amores'' 3.4.37: ''rusticus est nimium quem laedit adultera coniunx''.</ref> Ovid's predecessor [[Catullus]] wrote poetry celebrating his adulterous affair with "Lesbia", his [[social class in ancient Rome|social superior]], traditionally identified as [[Clodia (wife of Metellus)|Clodia]]. The cultivation of a laissez-faire attitude as a sign of urbanity may have prompted the provision of Augustus' adultery law that required a husband to divorce his wife and bring formal legal charges against her, or face charges himself for [[procuring (prostitution)|pimping]] ''(lenocinium)''.<ref>[[#Edwards|Edwards]], p. 56.</ref>

===Master-slave relations===
{{Further|Slavery in ancient Rome|Contubernium}}
Sexuality was a "core feature" of ancient Roman slavery.<ref>[[#Harper|Harper]], p. 26.</ref> Because slaves were regarded as property under [[Roman law]], an owner could use them for sex or hire them out to service other people.<ref>[[#Fantham|Fantham]], pp. 118, 128.</ref> Some scholars interpret "intimate and affectionate" references Cicero's letters<ref>Neville Morley, "Social Structure and Demography," in ''A Companion to the Roman Republic'', p. 309, describes the relationship thus. [[Pliny the Younger|Pliny]]  claims (''[[Epistulae (Pliny)|Epistle]]'' 7.4.6) to preserve an epigram by Cicero on Tiro which reveals Tiro's "effeminate subordination," as described by Ellen Oliensis, "The Erotics of ''amicitia'': Readings in Tibullus, Propertius, and Horace," in ''[[#Hallett|Hallett]]'', p. 171, note 37. See also comments on the epigram by [[#Richlin1983|Richlin (1983)]], pp. 34 and 223, who thinks it may have been Pliny's joke.</ref> as indicating that he had a long-term homosexual relationship with his slave [[Marcus Tullius Tiro|Tiro]].<ref name="bisexuality103"/> As [[Eva Cantarella]] stated bluntly, "the Roman ''paterfamilias'' was an absolute master, ... he exercised a power outside any control of society and the state. In this situation why on earth should he refrain from [[sodomy|sodomising]] his houseboys?"<ref>[[#Cantarella|Cantarella]], p. 99.</ref><ref group="n">Martial (6.39) observed that the power of the ''paterfamilias'' was so absolute that having sex with his own son was technically not a transgression ''([[nefas]])'', as noted by John Boswell, ''Christianity, Social Tolerance, and Homosexuality: Gay People in Western Europe from the Beginning of the Christian Era to the Fourteenth Century'' (University of Chicago Press, 1980), p. 67.</ref> In describing the ideal partner in pederasty, Martial prefers a slave boy who "acts more like a free man than his master", that is, one who can frame the affair as a stimulating game of courtship.<ref>William Fitzgerald, ''Slavery and the Roman Literary Imagination'' (Cambridge University Press, 2000), pp. 47–48</ref><ref name=h13>Hubbard, Thomas K. (2003) ''Homosexuality in Greece and Rome: A Sourcebook of Basic Documents''. University of California Press. p. 13. {{ISBN|978-0-520-23430-7}}.</ref> But this form of sexual release thus held little erotic [[wikt:cachet|cachet]]: to use one's own slaves was "one step up from [[#Masturbation|masturbation]]".<ref>[[#Parker|Parker]], p. 286.</ref> When figures identifiable as slaves appear in erotic art, they are performing routine tasks in the background, not taking part in sex acts.<ref>Excluding those presumed to be prostitutes, who might be either slaves or ''[[#Pleasure and infamy|infames]]''; [[#Parker|Parker]], p. 283.</ref> In his [[Oneirocritica|work on the interpretation of dreams]] (''c.'' 170&nbsp;AD), [[Artemidorus]] takes a symbolic view of the sexual value of slaves: to dream of having sex with one's own female slave was a good thing, "for slaves are the dreamer's possession; therefore taking pleasure in them signifies the dreamer's being pleased with his own possessions".<ref>Artemidorus, p. 88.5–12 Pack</ref><ref>[[#Potter2009|Potter (2009)]], p. 340.</ref>

A Roman could exploit his own slaves for sex, but was not entitled to compel any enslaved person he chose to have sex, since the owner had the right to control his own property.<ref name="bisexuality103"/> In the pursuit of sex with a slave who belonged to someone else, persuasion or threats might be employed.<ref name=h13/> A charge of rape could not be brought against a free man who forced a slave to have sex, since a slave lacked the legal standing that protected a citizen's body, but the owner could prosecute the rapist under the ''[[Lex Aquilia]]'', a law pertaining to property damage.<ref name="prostitution314"/>

A slave's sexuality was closely controlled. Slaves had no right to legal marriage ''([[Marriage in ancient Rome|conubium]])'', though they could live together as husband and wife ''([[Contubernium|contubernales]])''. An owner usually restricted the heterosexual activities of his male slaves to females he also owned; any children born from these unions added to his wealth.<ref name="bisexuality103"/> [[Cato the Elder|Cato]], at a time when Rome's large-scale slave economy was still in early development, thought it good practice to monitor his slaves' sex lives, and required male slaves to pay a fee for access to their female fellow slaves.<ref>Plutarch, ''Life of the Elder Cato'' [https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Plutarch/Lives/Cato_Major*.html#21.2 21.2]; Sandra R. Joshel and [[Sheila Murnaghan]], introduction to ''Women and Slaves in Greco-Roman Culture: Differential Equations'' (Routledge, 1998), p. 11.</ref>

[[File:Ithyphallic slave Louvre Myr332.jpg|thumb|left|upright|[[Grotesque]] figurine of an [[ithyphallic]] slave: in Roman comedy, slaves are often portrayed as oversexed]]
If an owner found that his male slave was having a sexual relationship with a free woman, the law required that he warn the couple three times to break it off. If the affair continued, he had the right to take ownership of the woman.<ref name="bisexuality103">[[#Cantarella|Cantarella]], p. 103.</ref> References to women from respectable families having sex with a male slave are infrequent, indicating that male writers were not preoccupied with the risk of it.<ref>[[#Parker|Parker]], p. 281.</ref> Cicero offers no examples in either the gossipy parts of his letters or in court cases where he attacks the reputation of a woman: he accuses [[Clodia (wife of Metellus)|Clodia]] of incest and of running her house like a brothel, but not of sleeping with slaves. Not even [[Messalina]] or [[Sallust]]'s Sempronia is accused in the hostile sources of having sex with a slave.<ref>[[#Parker|Parker]], p. 283.</ref> Sex with a slave was among the trumped-up charges against [[Claudia Octavia]], the wife of Nero, when [[Poppaea Sabina]] campaigned to take her place,<ref>Tacitus, ''Annales'' 14.60, as cited by [[#Williams|Williams]], p. 399.</ref> but mostly it was a matter for innuendo or insult against a husband who failed to prevent it.<ref>Mostly in Juvenal and Martial, as in the latter's epigram 6.39, where the seven children of Cinna were supposedly fathered by various slaves of the household; [[#Parker|Parker]], p. 292.</ref>

Despite the external controls and restrictions placed on a slave's sexuality, Roman art and literature perversely often portray slaves as lascivious, voyeuristic, and even sexually knowing.<ref>[[#Harper|Harper]], pp. 203–204.</ref> One of the themes of Roman comedy that distinguishes it from its Greek models is the depiction of master-slave relations.<ref>[[#Williams|Williams]], pp. 36–38.</ref>

Freeborn Romans who fell into slavery were supposed to be protected from sexual exploitation, as indicated by two different stories recorded by ancient historians.<ref>[[Livy]] 8.28 (see also [[Dionysius of Halicarnassus]] 16.5); [[Valerius Maximus]] 6.1.9. The historicity of these stories is questionable, and they should perhaps be regarded as ''[[exemplum|exempla]]'' encapsulating themes of historical events; see [[#Cantarella|Cantarella]], pp. 104–105, and Gary Forsythe, ''A Critical History of Early Rome: From Prehistory to the First Punic War'' (University of California Press, 2005, 2006), p. 313, where the names are seen as "clearly fictitious."</ref> Before the abolition of [[debt bondage]] in the 4th century BC,<ref>By the ''[[Lex Poetelia Papiria]]'' in 326&nbsp;BC (or 313, according to [[Varro]]).</ref> free Romans were sometimes driven to sell themselves or their children into slavery when they were overwhelmed by debt. According to [[Livy]], debt slavery (''[[nexum]]'') was abolished as a direct result of the attempted sexual abuse of a freeborn youth who served as surety for his father's debt<ref>Dionysius's version says the youth went into debt to pay for his father's funeral, an act of [[pietas|Roman piety]].</ref> with the [[usurer]] Lucius Papirius. The boy, Gaius Publilius, was notably beautiful, and Papirius insisted that as a bond slave he was required to provide sexual services. When Publilius refused, Papirius had him stripped and whipped. The youth then took to the streets to display his injuries, and an outcry among the people led the [[Roman consul|consuls]] to convene the [[Roman Senate|senate]]. The political process eventually led to the ''[[Lex Poetelia Papiria]]'', which prohibited holding debtors in bondage for their debt and required instead that the debtor's property be used as collateral. The law thus established that the integrity of a Roman citizen's body was fundamental to the concept of ''libertas'', political liberty, in contrast to the uses to which a slave's body was subject.<ref group="n">The abolition of debt bondage was facilitated by the spread of [[chattel slavery]] for agricultural labor; thus during the period of Roman conquest and expansionism on the Italian peninsula, the distinction arises between a Roman citizen with rights and an "Italian" who might be enslaved; see John W. Rich, "Tiberius Gracchus, Land and Manpower," in ''Crises and the Roman Empire. Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire (Nijmegen, June 20–24, 2006)'' (Brill, 2007), p. 160.</ref> In this and a similar incident reported by [[Valerius Maximus]], corporal punishment and sexual abuse are seen as similar violations of the citizen's freedom from physical compulsion, in contrast to the slave's physical vulnerability.<ref group="n">In the similar story from Valerius Maximus, a young man named Titus Veturius, whose father was a bankrupt [[Roman magistrate]], had placed himself in slavery with Publius Plotius, who had attempted to seduce him ''([[#Stuprum|stuprare]])''. When Veturius refused, Plotius whipped him. Veturius then complained to the [[Roman consul|consuls]], who took the complaint to the [[Roman senate|senate]]. Plotius was jailed. See [[#Cantarella|Cantarella]], pp. 104–105</ref><ref>[[#Williams|Williams]], pp. 102–103, emphasizing that the homosexual nature of Plotius's ''libido'' is not at issue, but rather his violation of a freeborn Roman male's body; Forsythe, ''A Critical History of Early Rome'', pp. 313–314; Butrica, "Some Myths and Anomalies in the Study of Roman Sexuality," pp. 214–215.</ref>

Some sexual protections could be extended to slaves. The conduct of slaves reflected generally on the respectability of the household, and the ''materfamilias'' in particular was judged by her female slaves' sexual behavior, which was expected to be moral or at least discreet. This decorum may have limited the exploitation of female slaves that were part of the ''familia''.<ref>[[#Harper|Harper]], pp. 294–295.</ref> [[Seneca the Younger|Seneca]] expressed Stoic indignation that a male slave should be groomed effeminately and used sexually, because a slave's human dignity should not be debased.<ref>[[#Nussbaum|Nussbaum]], p. 308, citing Seneca, ''Epistula'' 47.</ref> The burgeoning trade in eunuch slaves during the early Empire prompted legislation under the emperor [[Hadrian]] that prohibited the castration of a slave against his will "for lust or gain".<ref>Ra'anan Abusch, "CIrcumcision and Castration under Roman Law in the Early Empire," in ''The Covenant of Circumcision: New Perspectives on an Ancient Jewish Rite'' (Brandeis University Press, 2003), pp. 77–78.</ref> Legal agreements on the sale of a slave might include a ''ne serva prostituatur'' [[covenant (law)|covenant]] that prohibited the employment of the slave as a prostitute. Although concern for the slave's welfare may have been a factor in individual cases, this legal restriction seems also to have been intended to shield the male citizen owner from the shame or ''[[#Pleasure and infamy|infamia]]'' associated with pimping and prostitution. The ''ne serva'' covenant remained in force for subsequent sales, even if the buyer was initially unaware of it, and if it was violated, the illegally prostituted slave was granted freedom.<ref>[[#McGinn1998|McGinn (1998)]], p. 288ff., especially p. 297 on [[manumission]]. From a legalistic perspective, the covenant was not subject to negotiation for subsequent sales, because that would implicitly violate it.</ref>

===Prostitution===
{{Main|Prostitution in ancient Rome}}
[[File:Wall painting - love-making - Vesuvius region - Napoli MAN.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Wall painting from the [[Lupanar (Pompeii)|''lupanar'' (brothel) of Pompeii]] showing the use of a ''kline'', an angled board for maintaining a position]]
Prostitution was legal throughout the Roman Empire in all periods.<ref name="auto5"/> Most prostitutes were [[Slavery in ancient Rome|slaves or freedwomen]].<ref name="Strong 2016"/> Prostitutes in Rome had to register with the [[aedile]]s. Despite what might seem to be a clear distinction as a matter of law, the jurist [[Ulpian]] opined that an openly [[promiscuous woman]] brought the status of [[prostitute]] upon herself, even if she accepted no money.<ref>[[#Hallett|Hallett]], p. 76, citing Ulpian, ''Digest'' 23.2.43.3.</ref> The Augustan moral legislation that criminalized adultery exempted prostitutes, who could legally have sex with a married man. Encouraged to think of adultery as a matter of law rather than morality, a few socially prominent women even chose to avoid prosecution for adultery by registering themselves as prostitutes.<ref>[[#Habinek|Habinek]], p. 29.</ref>

Confused status frequently results in plot complications in the [[Roman comedy|comedies]] of [[Plautus]] and [[Terence]]. Obstacles to love arise when a young man falls in love with, and wishes to marry, a non-citizen prostitute, and are overcome when the young woman's true status as a freeborn virgin is revealed. The well-brought-up freeborn virgin is marriageable, and the non-citizen prostitute is not.<ref>[[#Langlands|Langlands]], pp. 205–206.</ref> The relation of these comic situations to real life is problematic: Plautus and Terence drew on Greek models which are often little known, and so the extent to which they incorporated Roman social behaviors and attitudes is hard to determine. [[Elaine Fantham]] has observed that prolonged military campaigning in Greece and Asia Minor had introduced Roman men to a more sophisticated standard of luxury and pleasure, perhaps reflected by comedy: the young man acts out his infatuation with an expensive courtesan instead of a family slave or common prostitute.<ref>[[#Fantham|Fantham]], p. 139.</ref>

[[File:Symplegma prostitute Glyptothek Munich.jpg|thumb|right|A prostitute having sex with a client; though fragmentary, an uncommonly found depiction of such a scene in sculpture{{cn|date=July 2023}} (Glyptothek Museum, 1st century CE)]]
Prostitutes appear in [[erotic art in Pompeii and Herculaneum]], including wall paintings from buildings identified as brothels, in which they are often nude except for a strapless bra ''(strophium)''. The paintings illustrate various sexual positions that contradict some scholarly claims about the preferences of Roman men in heterosexual acts.<ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]]</ref> Literary sources record that prostitutes wore distinctive clothing, often gaudy dresses of see-through silk. They were the only Roman women who wore the [[toga]], the distinctive dress of a free Roman male. This crossing of gender boundaries has been interpreted variously.<ref name="unspeakable1">[[#Hallett|Hallett]], p. 81.</ref>

====Pleasure and infamy====
Prostitutes and pimps were among those professions in Rome categorized as ''infames'', enjoying few legal protections even if they were technically not slaves.<ref>[[#Hallett|Hallett]], p. 66.</ref> ''[[Infamia]]'' as a legal status once entered into could not be escaped: a prostitute was "not only a woman who practices prostitution, but also one who has formerly done so, even though she has ceased to act in this manner; for the disgrace is not removed even if the practice is subsequently discontinued".<ref>According to the ''[[Lex Iulia et Papia]]'', as cited in ''Women's Life in Greece and Rome: A Sourcebook in Translation'', edited by [[Mary R. Lefkowitz]] and Maureen B. Fant (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005, 3rd ed.), p. 118.</ref>

In the Roman moral tradition, pleasure ''(voluptas)'' was a dubious pursuit. The Stoic moralist Seneca contrasts pleasure with virtue ''(virtus)'':

<blockquote>
Virtue you will find in the [[Roman temple|temple]], in the [[forum (Roman)|forum]], in the [[Roman senate|senate house]], standing before the city walls, dusty and sunburnt, her hands rough; pleasure you will most often find lurking around the [[thermae|baths and sweating rooms]], and places that fear the [[aedile|police]], in search of darkness, soft, effete, reeking of wine and perfume, pallid or else painted and made up with cosmetics like a corpse.<ref>[[Seneca the Younger|Seneca]], ''De vita beata'' 7.3</ref><ref>[[#Hallett|Hallett]], p. 84.</ref>
</blockquote>

[[File:Nennig Roman Villa and Mosaics - 51134391753.jpg|thumb|[[Juvenal]] thought the ''[[retiarius]]'' ''(left)'', a gladiator who fought with face and flesh exposed, was effeminate and prone to sexual deviance.<ref>Juvenal, ''Satires'' 2 and 8; Michael Carter, "(Un)Dressed to Kill: Viewing the ''Retiarius''," in ''Roman Dress and the Fabrics of Roman Culture'' (University of Toronto Press, 2008), pp. 120–121.</ref>]]

Roman ambivalence toward physical pleasure is expressed by the ''infamia'' of those whose bodies provided it publicly.<ref>[[#Hallett|Hallett]], pp. 66–67.</ref> In a technical sense, ''infamia'' was an official loss of legal standing for a freeborn person as a result of misconduct, including sexual misconduct, but the word could be used for ill repute in general.<ref>Both the censors and the [[praetor]]s could impose ''infamia'' as a legal status; [[#McGinn1998|McGinn (1998)]], p. 65ff.</ref> ''Infamia'' was an "inescapable consequence" of certain professions, including not only prostitutes and pimps but performers such as [[Theatre of ancient Rome|actors]], dancers, and [[gladiator]]s:<ref>[[#Hallett|Hallett]], p. 67. The ''[[Heraclea Lucania#Tabulae Heracleenses|Tabula Heracleensis]]'', "probably from the time of [[Julius Caesar]]," lists those who are barred from holding local [[Roman magistrate|magistracies]], including anyone "who has or shall ... have been hired out for the purpose of fighting as a gladiator ... or who has or shall have prostituted his person; or who has been or shall have been a trainer of gladiators or actors, or who shall run <or shall have run> a brothel" (as quoted by [[#Hallett|Hallett]], p. 70). Although ''infamia'' can be used as a [[Roman law|legal term]] and was codified as such by the time of [[Hadrian]], in the Republic and [[Principate]] it also has a non-technical, social sense.</ref> "These figures were the objects of other people's desires. They served the pleasure of others. They were tarnished by exposure to the public [[gaze]]."<ref name="unspeakable"/>

Those labeled ''infames'' (singular ''infamis'') were liable to corporal punishment, usually reserved for slaves.<ref>[[#Hallett|Hallett]], p. 73.</ref> Under the Republic and early Empire, one of the ways in which the citizen's liberty was defined was through the freedom of his body from physical coercion or punishment such as flogging by authorities.<ref>[[#Hallett|Hallett]], pp. 73–74. By the 2nd and 3rd centuries, low-status free persons were increasingly subjected to various forms of corporal punishment, as republican ideals vanished.</ref> However, citizens who chose to become public performers and use their bodies to offer public pleasure<ref>Even trades which served sensual pleasures ''(voluptates)'' were considered less honorable than others, including fishmongers, butchers, cooks, poulterers, fishermen, and perfumers, all of whom Cicero classed with dancers and performers of the ''[[ludus talarius]]'' (''[[De officiis]]'' 1.150, citing the playwright Terence); [[Sexuality in ancient Rome#Hallett|Hallett]], p. 83.</ref> were excluded from these physical protections, and could be beaten or otherwise subjected to violence.<ref>[[#Hallett|Hallett]], pp. 74–75.</ref> Any free man who became a gladiator took an oath to suffer branding, bondage, beating, and potential death by the sword.<ref>[[#Hallett|Hallett]], p. 77.</ref> Both glamorized and despised, the [[Gladiator#Religion, ethics and sentiment|gladiator was supposed to exert a compelling sexual allure]] over women.<ref>[[#Hallett|Hallett]], pp. 77–78</ref><ref>Michael Carter, "(Un)Dressed to Kill: Viewing the ''Retiarius''," in ''Roman Dress and the Fabrics of Roman Culture'' (University of Toronto Press, 2008), p. 114 ''et passim''.</ref>

Actors were sexually ambiguous, in part because they could imitate women,<ref>In tragedy and the literary comedies of Plautus and Terence, female roles were played by masked men in drag. [[#Hallett|Hallett]], p. 80</ref><ref>[[Juvenal]], ''Satire'' 3.95–97.</ref> and were attractive to both men and women. The ''[[Roman dictator|dictator]]'' [[Sulla]] had a long-term affair with an actor;<ref>Plutarch, ''Life of Sulla'' 3.3.</ref> [[Maecenas]], the arts patron and advisor to [[Augustus]], was in love with the actor [[Bathyllus]];<ref>[[Tacitus]], ''Annales'' 1.54.</ref> and women of the Imperial family are alleged to have had affairs with actors.<ref>Including "the wives of [[Claudius]] and [[Domitian]]": [[#Hallett|Hallett]], p. 80.</ref> Actresses were assumed to be prostitutes.<ref name="unspeakable1"/>

A man who enjoyed receiving anal sex or providing oral sex, often characterized as a ''[[cinaedus]]'', might also be stigmatized as ''infamis'', though if he was a citizen he could retain his legal standing.<ref name="unspeakable"/><ref>[[#Richlin1993|Richlin (1993)]], 550–551, 555ff.</ref>

====Private sex clubs====
{{see also|Venereum}}
Archaeological evidence, primarily from Pompeii and Herculaneum, and literary sources seem to indicate the existence of private "sex clubs" in some Roman homes ''([[domus|domūs]])''.<ref>[[#McGinn2004|McGinn (2004)]], pp. 157–159.</ref> Most Romans lived in apartments ''([[insulae]])''; the ''domus'' was a large, independent dwelling owned by a family of considerable means, and in Rome was central to the family's social identity. A few of these residences have rooms decorated with pornographic art not differing from that found in identified brothels; in some cases, an erotically decorated room has its own exterior door to admit visitors<ref>[[#McGinn2004|McGinn (2004)]], pp. 157–158, sites listed pp. 163–164.</ref> who would normally enter the home through the main doors leading to the atrium, where the family displayed [[Roman funerals and burial#Funerary art|ancestral images]] and other trophies of respectability.

It has been suggested<ref>[[#McGinn2004|McGinn (2004)]], pp. 158–159.</ref> that these rooms were meant to evoke the ambiance of a brothel for the hosting of exclusive sex parties, such as the one described by the historian [[Valerius Maximus]] as occurring in 52&nbsp;BC with a [[Roman consul|consul]] and the [[tribune|tribunes of the ''plebs'']] in attendance:

<blockquote>
Just as notorious was that party arranged for [[Metellus Scipio]] when he was consul and for the people's tribunes—by Gemellus, their tribunicial errand boy. He was a free man by birth, but twisted by his business to play the servant's role. Society gave a collective blush: he established a whorehouse in his own house, and pimped out [[Mucia gens|Mucia]] and [[Flavia gens|Flavia]], each of them notable for her father and husband, along with the aristocratic boy Saturninus.<ref>The identity of this boy and his likely family is much debated.</ref> Bodies in shameless submission, ready to come for a game of drunken sex! A banquet not for honoring consul and tribunes, but indicting them!<ref>[[Valerius Maximus]] 9.1.8: ''Aeque flagitiosum illud conuiuium, quod Gemellus tribunicius uiator ingenui sanguinis, sed officii intra seruilem habitum deformis Metello [et] Scipioni consuli ac tribunis pl. magno cum rubore ciuitatis conparauit: lupanari enim domi suae instituto Muniam et Flauiam, cum a patre tum a uiro utramque inclitam, et nobilem puerum Saturninum in eo prostituit. probrosae patientiae corpora, ludibrio temulentae libidini futura! epulas consuli et tribunis non celebrandas, sed uindicandas!'' [[#McGinn2004|McGinn (2004)]], p. 159, goes so far as to suggest that this party in particular helped make the Pompeian "sex clubs" fashionable.</ref>
</blockquote>
The existence of sex clubs may provide background for Late Republican political smears about public figures whose party guests included prostitutes,<ref>[[Cicero]] makes accusations of this kind against [[Verres]], [[Lucius Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus (consul 58 BC)|Piso]], and [[Mark Antony|Antony]], who is said to have converted his bedrooms into ''stabula'', the cubicles housing prostitutes in a brothel, and his dining room into ''popinae'', common [[wiktionary:eatery|eateries]]; see ''[[In Verrem]]'' 2.3.6, 2.4.83, 2.5.81–82, 137; ''[[Post Reditum in Senatu]]'' 11, 14; ''[[Philippicae]]'' 2.15, 62–63, 69, as cited by [[Sexuality in ancient Rome#McGinn2004|McGinn (2004)]], p. 163.</ref> and for the notorious Imperial whorehouse [[Caligula]] established on the [[Palatine Hill|Palatine]], where he prostituted married women and freeborn youths.<ref>[[#McGinn2004|McGinn (2004)]], pp. 159, 162.</ref>

==Sex acts and positions==
[[File:BLW Saucy Roman Tokens!.jpg|thumb|right|Bronze [[spintria|spintriae]] tokens (''c.'' 22–37 CE) depicting a range of sex acts are archaeologically abundant, but it is unclear what they were used for (Hunterian Museum and Art Gallery)]]

Around 90 positions for intercourse are recorded in the ancient world.<ref name="Leiden conference"/> Both Roman erotic art and Latin literature, most famously a passage from Ovid's ''[[Ars Amatoria|Art of Love]]'',<ref>Ovid, ''Ars Amatoria'' 3.771ff.</ref> depict various forms of copulation ''(concubitus varii)'' and sexual positions ''(figurae veneris)''. The Latin terms are Ovid's, from his description of how the most aristocratic households displayed erotic paintings among their art collections.<ref>Ovid, ''Tristia'' 2.1.523</ref><ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], pp. 91–92.</ref> Sexual variety fascinated Romans. Astrology was thought to influence one's preferences and pursuits: people born when the sun, moon, and planets were in certain [[astrological sign]]s<ref group="n">[[Capricorn (astrology)|Capricorn]], [[Aquarius (astrology)|Aquarius]], [[Taurus (astrology)|Taurus]] or [[Cancer (astrology)|Cancer]].</ref> were supposed to be inclined toward secret vice or "unnatural" forms of intercourse, or to becoming ''[[Homosexuality in ancient Rome#Pathicus|pathici]]''.<ref>[[Firmicus Maternus]] 5.2.4, 5.3.11 and 17, 5.6.8, 6.30.15; [[Vettius Valens]] 1.1, 2.16, 2.36 and 38, as cited and summarized in [[#Younger|Younger]], p. 20.</ref>

According to [[Suetonius]], [[Tiberius]] had a vast collection of sex manuals and erotic art, including a painting of the mythological huntress [[Atalanta]] performing oral sex on [[Meleager]], a work that the emperor regarded as worth more than a million [[sesterces]].<ref name="lovemaking92"/> 

[[#Epicurean sexuality|Lucretius]] observes that sex acts may have different purposes. Prostitutes employ certain movements to give their customers pleasure and avoid pregnancy. Wives wishing to conceive are advised against moving vigorously during intercourse, since such movements "knock the ploughshare from the furrow and misdirect the sowing of the seed".<ref>Lucretius, ''De rerum natura'' 4.1268–1273</ref><ref name="lucretius68"/> Lucretius recommends "[[doggy style]]" (''a tergo'') for couples trying to conceive, because it mimics the natural procreative sex of animals.<ref>Lucretius, ''De rerum natura'' 4.1263–1267</ref><ref>[[#Brown|Brown]], pp. 67–68.</ref>
{{clear}}
{{Wide image|Pompeii - Love Act on the Nile 2.jpg|700px|Erotic scene with a female and two males in a boat, surrounded by beasts; sex scenes set on the [[Nile]] consistently feature the [[doggy style]] position, often combined as here with [[fellatio]]<ref name="Leiden conference">{{cite conference |url=https://brill.com/view/title/12092 |title="The Meaning of Dwarfs in Nilotic Scenes," |author=Paul G.P. Meyboom |author2=Miguel John Versluys |date=1 Dec 2006 |publisher=Brill |book-title=Nile into Tiber: Egypt in the Roman World|pages=170–208 |location=Leiden |conference=Proceedings of the IIIrd International Conference of Isis Studies |isbn=978-90-47-41113-0|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220413220751/https://brill.com/view/title/12092 |archive-date=13 April 2022}}</ref>|box width|center|alt=alt text}}

===Male–female sex===
[[File:Clarke Ars Erotica 18.jpg|thumb|right|Back of bronze hand mirror (''c.'' 70–90 CE, found on the [[Esquiline Hill]]); above the couple is a picture with an erotic scene]]
The basic obscene verb for a man having sex with a woman is ''futuo'', "I [[fuck]]." Although not found in polite literature,<ref>The verb is not found, for instance, in the [[writings of Marcus Tullius Cicero|writings of Cicero]]; [[#Adams|Adams]], p. 118. ''Futuo'' appears mainly in graffiti (at least 65 instances) and the ''Priapea''. Martial uses the verb 49 times. It is found seven times in Catullus, and once in the early work of Horace. Although Ausonius revives the general obscenity of Martial, he avoids the use of ''futuo''.</ref> ''futuo'' was not necessarily insulting or aggressive; it was used transactionally for sex between a prostitute and her client. In a passionate or loving setting, it may have been spoken as an arousing intimacy.<ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], pp. 120–121.</ref> A fragment from a play by Plautus suggests that acquiring an erotic vocabulary was part of a woman's introduction to sexuality within marriage: a virgin explains that she has not yet learned the words suitable for the wedding night ''(nupta verba)''.<ref>Plautus, frg. 68 in the edition of Lindsay</ref><ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], p. 121.</ref> A woman's easy use of the word in other settings indicates her independence of social norms. "Either fuck me or let's fight it out," the formidable [[Fulvia]] is quoted as challenging the future Augustus.<ref>''Aut futue aut pugnemus'', literally "either fuck or let's fight," in Martial 11.20.7; [[#Adams|Adams]], p. 121. Augustus chooses to sound the call to battle.</ref> In graffiti at Pompeii written by both men and women, forms of ''futuo'' are used to announce prowess, satisfaction, or availability.

[[Thomas Habinek]] has claimed that "[[Ovid]] invents the category of the heterosexual male", since, he says, it was considered normal for a Roman man to have same-sex relations.<ref>[[#Habinek|Habinek]], p. 31.</ref> Ovid radically rejects the Roman tradition of pederasty, and says he takes more pleasure ''(voluptas)'' in making love with a woman as his equal. Sexual pleasure between man and woman, he emphasizes, should be mutual;<ref>[[Ovid]], ''[[Ars Amatoria]]'' 2.681–684: Women, he says, "need no encouragement to take their pleasure: let both man and woman feel what delights them equally. I hate embraces which fail to satisfy both partners. That is why for me loving boys holds little attraction" ''(Illis sentitur non inritata voluptas: / Quod iuvet, ex aequo femina virque ferant. / Odi concubitus, qui non utrumque resolvunt; / Hoc est, cur pueri tangar amore minus)''; [[#Edwards|Edwards]], p. 7</ref><ref name="Liveley 2005">{{cite book |last=Liveley |first=Genevieve |year=2005 |title=Ovid: Love Songs |location=[[London]] |publisher=[[Bloomsbury Academic]] |series=Ancients in Action |page=52 |isbn=9781853996702}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.2307/3051285 |jstor=3051285|title=The Warren Cup: Homoerotic Love and Symposial Rhetoric in Silver|journal=The Art Bulletin|volume=81|pages=21–52 (36)|year=1999|last1=Pollini|first1=John}}</ref> Ovid instructs his male pupils to make love to a woman slowly,<ref name="Liveley 2005"/> as he advises men not to conclude the sex act without [[Female orgasm|enabling their female partners to achieve orgasm]].<ref name="Liveley 2005"/> In one passage, he seems to be recommending simultaneous orgasm:<ref name="Liveley 2005"/>

<blockquote>
But don't you fail your lady, hoisting bigger sails, and don't let her get ahead of you on the track either; race to the finish together: that's when pleasure is full, when man and woman lie there, equally vanquished.<ref>Ovid, ''Ars Amatoria'' 2.725–8, as cited in [[#Potter2009|Potter (2009)]], p. 343.</ref>
</blockquote>

====''Mulier equitans''====
[[File:Erotic scene Pompeii MAN Napoli Inv27686.jpg|thumb|right|The [[#Mulier equitans|"woman riding" position]] was a favorite in Roman art; here, the breasts remain covered, but the "[[mons veneris|mound of venus]]" is depilated<ref>[[#Fredrick|Fredrick]], p. 159.</ref>]]
"Riding" is a common metaphor for the sex act, particularly used of the [[Woman on top (sex position)|woman-on-top position]].<ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], p. 165.</ref> The ''mulier equitans'' ("woman riding") does not appear in [[Pottery of ancient Greece|Greek vase painting]]<ref>The position is discussed "in some detail" in Greek literature, and appears in other forms of Greek art; [[#Fredrick|Fredrick]], p. 159.</ref> but is popular in Roman art. Ovid recommends it for the petite woman, as a tall woman may not wish to seem too towering in relation to the man.<ref>Ovid, ''Ars Amatoria'' 3.777–778; Gibson, ''Ars Amatoria Book 3'', p. 393.</ref> Supposedly favored by the mythological couple [[#Marital sex|Hector and Andromache]], even though she was of legendary height, it was jokingly called "the Hector horse".<ref>''Hectoreus equus'' (''Ars Amatoria'' 3.777–778); Meyboom and Versluys, "The Meaning of Dwarfs in Nilotic Scenes," in ''Nile into Tiber'', p. 188; Gibson, ''Ars Amatoria Book 3'', p. 393. Trojan imagery, especially in connection with the [[Trojan horse]], became important under the [[Julio-Claudian dynasty|Julio-Claudian emperors]], who claimed descent from the [[Trojan war|Trojan]] refugee [[Aeneas]], son of Venus. See for instance [[Lusus Troiae|the "Troy Game"]].</ref> One [[relief]] from [[Roman Gaul]] showing the ''mulier equitans'' plays on the metaphor by picturing a galloping horse within a frame in the background.<ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], p. 258.</ref>

In art, the ''mulier equitans'' convention has the woman posed frontally to expose her body in full to the viewer, often emphasizing her depilated pubic area. The significance of this position in Roman culture has been interpreted variously. [[Kenneth Dover]] thought it might represent the relative sexual emancipation of Roman women.<ref>Kenneth Dover, ''Greek Homosexuality'' (Harvard University Press, 1978), p. 107, as cited by [[#Fredrick|Fredrick]], p. 159.</ref> From a woman's perspective, the position would grant independence of movement for her own pleasure.<ref>[[Catherine Johns]], ''Sex or Symbol? Erotic Images of Greece and Rome'' (Routledge, 1982), pp. 136–137, as cited in [[#Fredrick|Fredrick]], p. 159.</ref> [[Paul Veyne]], however, thought it emphasized that the woman had to do the work of servicing the man, who lies there and receives pleasure without effort.<ref>Paul Veyne, "La famille et l'amour sous le haut-empire romain," ''Annales: Économies, sociétés, civilisations'' 33 (1978) 53–54, as cited in [[#Fredrick|Fredrick]], p. 159.</ref> The position may have been favored for art because it pleased both male and female viewers: for men, it offered an unobstructed view of the woman's body, as recommended by Ovid, and of the penis entering the vagina; women saw the visually dominant female figure playing the active role.<ref>[[#Fredrick|Fredrick]], pp. 159–160.</ref>

[[File:Pompeii - Casa del Centenario - Cubiculum - Love scene from north wall.jpg|thumb|right|180px|The ''Venus pendula aversa'' position in a wall painting from Pompeii]]
The position is also called ''Venus pendula conversa'', "perpendicular Venus with the woman facing toward (the man)"; for its [[Reverse cowgirl (sex position)|reverse]] (''Venus pendula aversa'', "perpendicular Venus with the woman facing away"), the man lies down with the woman on top, but she turns her back and faces his feet. This version is rarely mentioned or depicted, but is found in Roman art set in [[Nilotic landscape|Nilotic Egypt]].<ref>Meyboom and Versluys, "The Meaning of Dwarfs in Nilotic Scenes," in ''Nile into Tiber'', p. 188.</ref>

An equestrian metaphor is also found for the ''[[#Male–male sex|cinaedus]]'' "riding" on top in anal sex,<ref>Petronius, ''Satyricon'' 24.4; ''[[Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum|CIL]]'' 4.1825</ref><ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], pp. 165–166.</ref> and at least once of lesbians who "take turns riding and move with the [[Luna (mythology)|Moon]] as witness".<ref>Juvenal 6.311</ref><ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], p. 166.</ref>

===Anal sex===
[[File:Pompeii - Casa del Ristorante 2.jpg|thumb|"The lioness" position ''(Casa del Ristorante, Pompeii)'']]
The Latin verb for "[[anal sex|to penetrate anally, bugger]]" is ''pedicare''. The object was usually but not always male. ''Pedicare'' was a blunt and non-euphemistic word, and can be used in a threatening manner, as notoriously by Catullus in [[Catullus 16|''Carmen'' 16]], or in general to mean "[[Fuck#Modern usage|fuck you]]".<ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], pp. 123–124</ref><ref name=richlin1981/> The etymology of ''pedicare'' is unclear, but some have thought it derived from Greek [[Pederasty in ancient Greece#Terminology|''paidika'', having to do with pederasty]].<ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], p. 123.</ref> The basic word for "anus" was ''culus''. Common metaphors are [[Dusios#Agricultural associations|''ficus'', "fig"]], and ''anus'', "ring," which was considered a decorous term and was standard in medical texts.<ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], pp. 112–114.</ref>

Men were said to "take it like a woman" (''muliebria pati'', "to undergo womanly things") when they were anally penetrated, but when a man performed anal sex on a woman, she was thought of as playing the boy's role.<ref>[[#Hallett|Hallett]], p. 31.</ref> Martial, for instance, is emphatic that anal sex is better with boys than with women; when his wife objects that she provides him with anal sex in an effort to preserve his fidelity, he taunts her with the inferiority of her anus compared with a boy's.<ref>Martial 12.75 and 96, using the fig metaphor; [[#Williams|Williams]], p. 27</ref><ref>[[#Richlin1983|Richlin (1983)]], pp. 41–42.</ref>

The ''figura veneris'' in which the woman crouches to lift her buttocks, called "the lioness", may be intended for anal penetration, since boys in Greek art can be portrayed in the same position; with a female partner, it may be difficult to distinguish in art from ''a tergo'' (rear entry).<ref>"The lionness" as a name for the position was popularized by 4th-century BC Greeks; [[#Clarke|Clarke]], pp. 26, 230.</ref> ''Culibonia'' ("good anal") was a humorous term for a prostitute with this speciality.<ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], pp. 110–111.</ref> Avoiding pregnancy may have been one motive for female prostitutes to offer anal intercourse.<ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], p. 230.</ref>

===''Os impurum''===
[[File:Roman oil Lamp with erotic motif 05.jpg|thumb|right|Fellatio on an oil lamp]]
''Os impurum'', "filthy mouth" or "impure mouth", was a term of abuse especially for those who provided [[oral sex]].<ref>Valentina Arena, "Roman Oratorical Invective," in ''A Companion to Roman Rhetoric'' (Blackwell, 2010), p. 156; Nancy Woman, ''Abusive Mouths in Classical Athens'' (Cambridge University Press, 2008), p. 322.</ref> "Oral turpitude"<ref name="abusive">Woman, ''Abusive Mouths'', p. 322.</ref> was a favorite form of [[invective]] for Catullus,<ref>Catullus, ''Carmina'' 39, 78b, 97, 99; William Fitzgerald, ''Catullan Provocations: Lyric Poetry and the Drama of Position'' (University of California Press, 1995, 1999), p. 262.</ref> Horace, and Martial.<ref name="abusive"/> An accusation of having an ''os impurum'' is an "extreme obscenity",<ref>''A Companion to Catullus'' (Blackwell, 2011), [https://books.google.com/books?id=2buHe449NoAC&pg=PT323&dq=%22the+imputation+of+os+impurum%22&hl=en&ei=3SsoTtzdIeupsAKwqq07&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCkQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22the%20imputation%20of%20os%20impurum%22&f=false n.p.]</ref> so vile that Cicero reserved it for men of lower standing than himself,<ref>[[Quintus Apronius]], the assistant of Verres, at ''Verres'' 2.3; [[Sextus Cloelius]], a henchman of [[Publius Clodius Pulcher|Clodius Pulcher]], at ''De domo sua'' 25, 26, 47–8, 83.</ref> only implying that their debasement tainted their more powerful [[Patronage in ancient Rome|patrons]] who were his real targets.<ref>Arena, "Roman Oratorical Invective," p. 156.</ref>

It was a convention of obscenely comic verse that oral sex caused bad breath that was nearly toxic.<ref name="auto6">[[#Richlin1983|Richlin (1983)]], p. 27</ref><ref>Guillermo Galán Vioque, ''Martial, Book VII: A Commentary'' (Brill, 2002), p. 495.</ref> "Whores of the alleyways" are contaminated from giving oral sex; Catullus refers to "the foul saliva of a pissed-over whore".<ref>Catullus, ''Carmen'' 99.10</ref><ref name="auto6"/> The urinary function of the penis makes oral sex particularly repulsive to Catullus, who elsewhere reviles a [[Celtiberians|Celtiberian]] for brushing his teeth in urine.<ref>[[#Richlin1983|Richlin (1983)]], p. 150.</ref> Martial jokes that a fine perfume turned to ''[[garum]]'', [[fish sauce]], when it was sniffed by a man whose breath was putrid from oral sex.<ref>Martial, 7.94; Vioque, ''Martial, Book VII'', p. 495.</ref> In another of Martial's epigrams, a ''fellator'' breathes on a hot cake to cool it down and turns it to excrement.<ref>Martial, 3.17; Guillermo Galán Vioque, ''Martial, Book VII: A Commentary'', p. 495.</ref> The bad breath and rotten teeth that are attributed to performing oral sex represent moral decay and a general corruption of the mouth's positive functions as the organ of a citizen's persuasive speech.<ref>Woman, ''Abusive Mouths'', p. 322f</ref><ref>[[#Richlin1983|Richlin (1983)]], p. 99</ref><ref>Marilyn B. Skinner, ''Catullus in Verona: A Reading of the Elegiac'' Libellus'', Poems 65–116'' (Ohio State University Press, 2003), p. 79.</ref>

====Cunnilingus and fellatio====
<!--This image is referred to in the accompanying text; please do not move or remove it-->
[[File:Pompeii - Terme Suburbane - Apodyterium - Scene IV.jpg|thumb|Wall painting from Pompeii depicting [[cunnilingus]]]]

Because of the stigma attached to providing physical pleasure, a man who performed oral sex on a woman was subject to mockery. [[Cunnilingus]] typically appears in Roman art only as part of a reciprocal act, with the woman [[fellatio|fellating]] her male partner in some variation of the [[69 (sex position)|"69" position]].<ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], p. 224.</ref>  However, a wall painting from Pompeii (shown here) represents a virtually unique role reversal in giving oral sex. The woman who receives cunnilingus is tall and shapely, well-groomed, and brazenly nude except for jewelry. The male figure is relatively small, crouching subserviently, and fully clothed; he looks anxious or furtive.<ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], p. 223</ref> The situation is so extreme that it was probably meant to be humorous as well as titillating; other paintings in this group show a series of sex acts, at least some of which could be seen as transgressive or [[parody|parodic]].<ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], pp. 224–227.</ref>

There is some evidence that women could hire male prostitutes to provide cunnilingus. Graffiti at [[Pompeii]] advertise the prices male prostitutes charged for cunnilingus, in the same price range as females performing fellatio; however, the graffiti could be intended as insults to the men named, and not as actual advertisements.<ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], p. 226.</ref> One graffito is perhaps intended as political invective: "Vote Isidore for [[aedile]]; he's the best at licking cunt!"<ref>''CIL'' 4.1383, scrawled at an entrance to a shop in Pompeii; Antonio Varone, ''Erotica Pompeiana: Love Inscriptions on the Walls of Pompeii'' («L'Erma» di Bretschneider, 2002), p. 81.</ref>

The Latin verb ''fellare'' is usually used for a woman performing oral sex on a man.<ref name=richlin1981/> Accusing a man of fellating another man was possibly the worst insult in all Roman invective.<ref>[[#Fredrick|Fredrick]], p. 162.</ref> It was an act that might be requested from women who were ''[[#Pleasure and infamy|infames]]'',<ref name=richlin1981/><ref>Catullus ''Carmina'' 58 and 59; and Martial, ''Epigrams'' 4.84, 9.4, 9.67, and 12.55, on women who perform fellatio.</ref> and not something a husband in a respectable household would have expected from his wife.<ref name="laughing161">[[#Fredrick|Fredrick]], p. 161.</ref> Fellatio was seen as a "somewhat laughable" preference for older men who have trouble maintaining an erection,<ref name=richlin1981/> but graffiti show that the skills of a good ''fellatrix'' were enthusiastically utilized.<ref>[[#Fredrick|Fredrick]], p. 163.</ref> Fellatio was a fairly uncommon subject in Roman art.<ref name="laughing161"/>

====''Irrumatio''====
''Irrumatio'' is a forced form of fellatio, almost always against another man. Forcing someone to be a receptacle for oral sex was proof of virility, something to boast about, as indicated by the ''[[Priapeia]]'' and the poems of Catullus and Martial. It was also threatened as a punishment,<ref>Mostly famously in [[Catullus 16|Catullus, ''Carmen'' 16]]</ref> particularly for adulterers.<ref name=richlin1981/> Martial urges a wronged husband who has already cut off the adulterous man's ears and nose to complete the humiliation by befouling his mouth with oral rape.<ref>Martial, 2.83</ref><ref name=richlin1981/>

===Group sex===
[[File:Terme di porta marina, affreschi a tema erotico nello spogliatoio, 05.jpg|thumb|[[Threesome]] (from Pompeii) arranged in the manner described by [[Catullus]], poem 56<ref name=":5">[[#Clarke|Clarke]], pp. 233–234.</ref>]]
Group sex appears in literary sources, graffiti, and art.<ref name=":5"/> [[Suetonius]] says that the emperor [[Tiberius]] enjoyed watching group sex, and described "chains" arranged of girls and boys:

<blockquote>
In his retreat at Capri, he put together a bedroom that was the theater of his secret debauches. There he assembled from all over companies of male and female prostitutes, and inventors of monstrous couplings (which he called ''spintriae''), so that, intertwining themselves and forming a triple chain ''(triplici serie connexi)'', they mutually prostituted themselves in front of him to fire up his flagging desires.<ref>[[Suetonius]], ''Life of Tiberius'' 43, as quoted by [[#Clarke|Clarke]], p. 234.</ref></blockquote>

[[File:Terme di porta marina, affreschi a tema erotico nello spogliatoio, 04.jpg|thumb|Foursome from the Suburban Baths at Pompeii]]
Most threesomes depict two men penetrating a woman. A medallion from [[Gallo-Roman culture|Roman Gaul]] shows two men reclining on a bed, one on the right and one on the left, with their legs extended under a woman between them. Another shows a woman "riding" a man who reclines, while a man standing behind her parts her legs to enter. A far less common variation has one man entering a woman from the rear while he in turn receives anal sex from a man standing behind him, a scenario found in Catullus, ''Carmen'' 56 as well as art. Catullus makes it clear that this concatenation was considered humorous,<ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], p. 234.</ref> possibly because the man in the center could be a ''cinaedus'', a male who liked to receive anal sex but who was also considered seductive to women.<ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], pp. 234–235.</ref>

[[Foursome (group sex)|Foursomes]] also appear in Roman art, typically with two women and two men, sometimes in same-sex pairings. One example of a foursome from the [[Suburban Baths (Pompeii)|Suburban Baths at Pompeii]] demonstrates what Romans saw as the superior role. A woman on the far right kneels beside a bed to perform cunnilingus on a woman lying on it; this woman in turn fellates a man who kneels above her. The man is himself receiving anal sex from a fourth figure, who is represented as the "victor": he acts only to fulfill his own sexual gratification without providing it to others, and looks directly at the viewer with a triumphant wave of the hand.<ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], p. 255.</ref>

A Latin [[epigram]] by the [[Gallo-Roman culture|Gallo-Roman]] poet [[Ausonius]] (4th century AD) is a riddle that depends on familiarity with the configurations of group sex:
<blockquote>"Three men in bed together: two are committing debauchery ''([[stuprum]])'', two are being debauched."<br />"Doesn't that make four men?"<br />"You're mistaken: the man on either end each counts as a single offense, but the one in the middle both acts and is acted on."<ref>[[Ausonius]], ''Epigram'' 43 Green (39); Matthew Kuefler, ''The Manly Eunuch: Masculinity, Gender Ambiguity, and Christian Ideology in Late Antiquity'' (University of Chicago Press, 2001), p. 92.</ref></blockquote>

===Masturbation===
{{See also|History of masturbation}}
[[Masturbation]] is little noted in the sources for Roman sexuality.<ref>Richlin, "Sexuality in the Roman Empire," p. 351.</ref> The Romans evidently preferred the left hand for masturbation.<ref>Antonio Varone, ''Erotica pompeiana: Love Inscriptions on the Walls of Pompeii'' («L'Erma» di Bretschneider, 2002), [https://books.google.com/books?id=Vg9h-tW4KikC&dq=insula+felicula&q=%22To+grasp+the+meaning+of+the+text%22#v=snippet&q=%22To%20grasp%20the%20meaning%20of%20the%20text%22&f=false p. 95.]</ref> [[Martial]] has a few mentions in his poems, but considers it an inferior form of sexual release resorted to by slaves, though he admits to masturbating when a beautiful slave-boy is too expensive to obtain: "my hand relieved me as a substitute for [[Ganymede (mythology)|Ganymede]]".<ref>Martial, 2.43.14</ref><ref>[[#Williams|Williams]], p. 270</ref><ref>J.P. Sullivan, ''Martial, the Unexpected Classic: A Literary and Historical Study'' (Cambridge University Press, 1991), p. 190. Martial describes slaves masturbating behind the door as they watch [[Andromache]] ride [[Hector]] (11.104.13–14).</ref> It was a longstanding if infrequent theme in Latin satire; one of the few surviving fragments of [[Gaius Lucilius|Lucilius]], Rome's earliest satirist, jokes about a personified penis ''([[Mutunus Tutunus#Etymology|Mutto]])'' whose girlfriend Laeva ("Lefty") wipes away his "tears".<ref>''At laeva lacrimas muttoni absterget amica'' ("A girlfriend wipes away Mutto's tears—his left hand, that is"): Lucilius 307 and 959. Kirk Freundenburg has dubbed the ''muttō'' of Lucilius "clearly the least finicky of all personified penises in Roman satire": ''Satires of Rome: Threatening Poses from Lucilius to Juvenal'' (Cambridge University Press, 2001), [https://books.google.com/books?id=QzOjItakZRoC&pg=PA205&dq=muttonis&lr=&as_drrb_is=q&as_minm_is=0&as_miny_is=&as_maxm_is=0&as_maxy_is=&num=100&as_brr=3&cd=3#v=onepage&q=muttonis&f=false p. 205.]</ref> A graffito from Pompeii reads "when my worries oppress my body, with my left hand I release my pent-up fluids".<ref>''multa mihi curae cum [pr]esserit artus has ego mancinas, stagna refusa, dabo'': ''[[Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum|CIL]]'' 4.2066, as cited by [[#Younger|Younger]], p. 108.</ref>

The etymology of the Latin verb ''masturbari'' is unclear. It has been argued that it is a compound of ''turbare'' 'agitate' and ''mas'' 'male', in an otherwise unattested usage for 'penis'.<ref>Etymological views as summarized by Joshua T. Katz, "''Testimonia Ritus Italici'': Male Genitalia, Solemn Declarations, and a New Latin Sound Law," ''Harvard Studies in Classical Philology'' 98 (1998), pp. 210–213, citing Judith P. Hallett, "Masturbator, mascarpio", ''Glotta'' 54 (1976) 292–308, for ''turbare'' + ''mas'', with support for this usage of ''mas'' from Douglas Q. Adams, "Latin ''mas'' and ''masturbari''", ''Glotta'' 63 (1985) 241–247.</ref> One traditional view sees ''man(u)-'' 'hand' with an altered form of ''[[#Stuprum|stuprare]]'' 'to defile, commit a sexual wrong against'.<ref>[[#Adams|Adams]], pp. 208–211.</ref> [[Calvert Watkins]] proposed that it derives from a [[Proto-Indo-European root]] meaning 'marrow, brain', since ancient medical writers believed that semen descended from the brain through the bones;<ref>[[Calvert Watkins]], ''[[How to Kill a Dragon: Aspects of Indo-European Poetics]]'' (Oxford University Press, 1995), p 533ff.</ref> if this is correct, the word ''turbare'' may still have influenced the formation in Latin.<ref>Katz, "''Testimonia Ritus Italici''," p. 212.</ref>

===Bestiality===
{{See also|History of zoophilia}}
[[File:Leda and the Swan, Pompeian fresco.jpg|thumb|Fresco from Pompeii showing Leda and the swan]]

The [[classical mythology|mythological tradition]] is full of sexual encounters between humans and other animals, especially mortal women and gods in the guise of animals. [[Bestiality]] is a particular characteristic of intercourse with [[Jupiter (mythology)|Jupiter]] (Greek [[Zeus]]), who visits [[Leda (mythology)|Leda]] as a swan and [[Europa (mythology)|Europa]] as a bull. The [[Minotaur]] is born when [[Pasiphaë]] feels such sexual attraction for a bull that she has herself disguised as a cow to mate with him. [[Satyr]]s, known for their sexual voracity, are often pictured with bestial features.<ref>Hendrik Wagenvoort, "On the Magical Significance of the Tail," in ''Pietas: Selected Studies in Roman Religion'' (Brill, 1980), p. 155.</ref>

{{anchor|Animal roleplay}}
Mock bestiality is recorded as a form of [[sexual roleplay]] in Imperial Rome.  The actor [[Bathyllus]] was known for an erotic dance in which he dressed as Leda having sex with the swan; the women watching were variously aroused.<ref>Juvenal, ''Satire'' 6.60ff.; Erik Gunderson, "The Libidinal Rhetoric of Satire," in ''The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire'' (Cambridge University Press, 2005), p. 235; Blanshard, ''Sex: Vice and Love from Antiquity to Modernity'', p. 40.</ref> Bestiality is also a theme of [[Apuleius]]' novel ''Metamorphoses'' (or ''[[The Golden Ass]]''), in which the protagonist, transformed into a donkey, is desired by a wealthy noble matron, just as Pasiphaë desired the bull.<ref>[[Apuleius]], ''[[The Golden Ass|Metamorphoses]]'' 10.19–22; Barton, ''The Sorrows of the Ancient Romans'', p. 68.</ref>

[[Nero]] is supposed to have enjoyed a form of [[Bondage (sexual)|bondage]] with either male or female partners in which he dressed in animal skins to attack their genitals, just as condemned prisoners were bound and attacked by wild animals in the arena.<ref>[[Suetonius]], ''Life of Nero'' [https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Suetonius/12Caesars/Nero*.html#29 29]; Carlin A. Barton, ''The Sorrows of the Ancient Romans: The Gladiator and the Monster'' (Princeton University Press, 1993), p. 68.</ref> The historian [[Cassius Dio|Dio]] tells of how a prostitute pretended to be a leopard for the gratification of a senator.<ref>[[Cassius Dio]] [https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/76*.html#8 76.8.2]; Barton, ''The Sorrows of the Ancient Romans'', p. 68.</ref>

[[File:Zliten leopard.jpg|thumb|left|Leopard attacking a condemned person in the arena ''([[Zliten mosaic]], c. 200&nbsp;AD)'']]
There is some indication that violent sexual encounters, like other mythological scenarios, were acted out as punitive entertainment in the arena. The poet [[Martial]] praises a scenario for its fidelity to the Pasiphaë myth.<ref>Martial, ''De spectaculis'' 5</ref><ref>{{cite journal| doi=10.2307/300280 | jstor=300280 | title=Fatal Charades: Roman Executions Staged as Mythological Enactments | journal=Journal of Roman Studies | volume=80 | page=44 | year=2012 | last1=Coleman | first1=K. M. }}</ref><ref>[[Paul Veyne]], ''Foucault: His Thought, His Character'' (Polity Press, 2010, originally published 2008 in French), p. 9.</ref> The logistics of staging a sex act between a woman and a bull is a matter of speculation; if "Pasiphaë" were a condemned criminal to be tortured and killed, the animal may have been induced by the application of "vaginal secretion from a cow [[Estrous cycle|in season]]".<ref>Coleman, "Fatal Charades," p. 64.</ref> In Apuleius' novel, a [[Venefica sorceress|female poisoner]] [[damnatio ad bestias|condemned ''ad bestias'']] is scheduled to appear in the arena for intercourse with the protagonist in his bestial form.<ref>Apuleius, ''Metamorphoses'' 10.29.34; Coleman, "Fatal Charades," p. 64.</ref>
<!--==Imperial decadence==-->

==Hermaphroditism and androgyny==
{{Main|Hermaphroditus|Aphroditus}}
[[File:Hermafrodito. Norte da África, Época Romana, Séculos II-III dc.jpg|right|thumb|Hermaphroditus on a mosaic from Roman North Africa, 2nd-3rd century CE]]
In the [[classical mythology|mythological tradition]], [[Hermaphroditus]] was a beautiful youth who was the son of [[Hermes]] (Roman [[Mercury (mythology)|Mercury]]) and Aphrodite (Venus).<ref>Ovid, ''Metamorphoses'' 4.287–88.</ref> Like many other divinities and [[Greek hero|heroes]], he had been nursed by [[nymph]]s,<ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.2307/506222|jstor=506222|title=The Goddess Ceres in the Ara Pacis Augustae and the Carthage Relief|journal=American Journal of Archaeology|volume=98|pages=65–100 (81)|year=1994|last1=Spaeth|first1=Barbette Stanley}}</ref> but the evidence that he himself received cult devotion among the Greeks is sparse.<ref name="auto7"/> Ovid wrote the most influential narrative<ref>[[#Taylor|Taylor]], p. 77</ref><ref name=":7"/> of how Hermaphroditus became androgynous, emphasizing that although the handsome youth was on the [[#Rites of passage|cusp of sexual adulthood]], he rejected love as [[Narcissus (mythology)|Narcissus]] had and likewise at the site of a reflective pool. There the water nymph [[Salmacis]] saw and desired him. He spurned her, and she pretended to withdraw until, thinking himself alone, he undressed to bathe in her waters. She then flung herself upon him, and prayed that they might never be parted. The gods granted this request, and thereafter the body of Hermaphroditus contained both male and female.<ref>[[#Taylor|Taylor]], p. 78ff.</ref> As a result, men who drank from the waters of the spring Salmacis supposedly "grew soft with the vice of ''[[Homosexuality in ancient Rome#Impudicitia|impudicitia]]''", according to the [[lexicographer]] [[Sextus Pompeius Festus|Festus]].<ref>Paulus ex Festo 439L</ref><ref>[[#Richlin1993|Richlin (1993)]], p. 549.</ref> The myth of [[Hylas]], the young companion of Hercules who was [[Lympha#Divine madness|abducted by water nymphs]], shares with Hermaphroditus and Narcissus the theme of the dangers that face the beautiful adolescent male as he transitions to adult masculinity, with varying outcomes for each.<ref>[[#Taylor|Taylor]], p. 216, note 46.</ref>

In contemporary English, "hermaphrodite" has acquired pejorative connotations in referring to people born with physical characteristics of both sexes (see [[intersex]]); in antiquity, however, the figure of the so-called hermaphrodite was a primary focus of questions pertaining to [[gender identity]].<ref name=":7">[[#Clarke|Clarke]], p. 49</ref><ref name="auto7">[[#Taylor|Taylor]], p. 78.</ref> The hermaphrodite represented a "violation of social boundaries, especially those as fundamental to daily life as male and female".<ref>Roscoe, "Priests of the Goddess," p. 204.</ref>

[[File:Berlín sátiro y hermafrodita.JPG|thumb|A satyr and Hermaphroditus, 2nd century CE (Altes Museum, Berlin)]]
Depictions of Hermaphroditus were very popular among the Romans. The dramatic situation in paintings often elicits a "[[wikt:double take|double take]]" on the part of the viewer, or expresses the theme of sexual frustration.<ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], p. 50.</ref> Hermaphroditus is often in the company of a [[satyr]], a figure of bestial sexuality known for subjecting an unsuspecting or often sleeping victim to non-consensual sex; the satyr in scenes with Hermaphroditus is usually shown to be surprised or repulsed, to humorous effect. In a few works, Hermaphroditus is strong enough to ward off his would-be attacker, but in others he shows his willingness to engage in sex, even if the satyr seems no longer inclined:<ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], pp. 50–55.</ref>
<blockquote>
Artistic representations of Hermaphroditus bring to the fore the ambiguities in sexual differences between women and men as well as the ambiguities in all sexual acts. ... Hermaphroditus gives an eternally ambiguous answer to a man's curiosity about a woman's sexual experience—and vice versa. ... (A)rtists always treat Hermaphroditus in terms of the viewer finding out his/her actual sexual identity. ... Hermaphroditus stands for both the physical and, more important, the psychological impossibility of ever understanding the feelings of the beloved. Hermaphroditus is a highly sophisticated representation, invading the boundaries between the sexes that seem so clear in classical thought and representation.<ref>[[#Clarke|Clarke]], pp. 54–55.</ref>
</blockquote>

[[File:Afrodito - Museo Arqueológico de Alicante MARQ - La belleza del cuerpo.JPG|thumb|upright|Roman imperial bronze figurine of Aphroditus, 1st–3rd century CE]]
[[Macrobius]] describes a masculine form of "Venus" (Aphrodite) who received cult on [[Cyprus]]; she had a beard and male genitals, but wore women's clothing. The deity's worshippers cross-dressed, men wearing women's clothes, and women men's.<ref>[[Macrobius]], ''Saturnalia'' 3.8.2. Macrobius says that Aristophanes called this figure ''Aphroditos''.</ref> The Latin poet [[Laevius]] wrote of worshipping "nurturing Venus" whether female or male ''([[Si deus si dea|sive femina sive mas]])''.<ref>''Venerem igitur almum adorans, sive femina sive mas est,'' as quoted by Macrobius, ''Saturnalia'' 3.8.3.</ref> The figure was sometimes called ''[[Aphroditos]]''. In several surviving examples of Greek and Roman sculpture, she is found in the [[attitude (art)|attitude]] ''anasyrmene'', from the Greek verb ''anasyromai'', "to pull up one's clothes".<ref>[[#Penner|Penner]], p. 22.</ref> The love goddess lifts her garments to reveal her masculine attribute, male genitalia, a gesture that traditionally held [[apotropaic]] or magical power.<ref>Dominic Montserrat, "Reading Gender in the Roman World," in ''Experiencing Rome: Culture, Identity, and Power in the Roman Empire'' (Routledge, 2000), pp. 172–173.</ref>

In his chapter on anthropology and human physiology in the encyclopedic ''[[Natural History (Pliny)|Natural History]]'', Pliny notes that "there are even those who are born of both sexes, whom we call [[hermaphrodite]]s, at one time ''[[androgyn]]i''" (''andr-'', "man", and ''gyn-'', "woman", from the Greek).<ref>Pliny, ''Natural History'' 7.34: ''gignuntur et utriusque sexus quos hermaphroditos vocamus, olim androgynos vocatos''</ref><ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.1111/1468-0092.00024|title=Multiple births in Graeco-Roman antiquity|journal=Oxford Journal of Archaeology|volume=16|pages=49–63 (61)|year=1997|last1=Dasen|first1=Veronique}}</ref> The Sicilian historian [[Diodorus Siculus|Diodorus]] (1st century BC) wrote that "there are some who declare that the coming into being of creatures of a kind such as these are marvels ''([[teratology|terata]])'', and being born rarely, they announce the future, sometimes for evil and sometimes for good".<ref>[[Diodorus Siculus]] 4.6.5; Will Roscoe, "Priests of the Goddess: Gender Transgression in Ancient Religion," in ''History of Religions'' 35.3 (1996), p. 204.</ref> [[Isidore of Seville]] (''c.'' 560–636) described a hermaphrodite fancifully as those who "have the right breast of a man and the left of a woman, and after coitus in turn can both sire and bear children".<ref>[[Isidore of Seville]], ''Eytmologiae'' 11.3. 11.</ref>

In [[Religion in ancient Rome|traditional Roman religion]], a hermaphroditic birth was a kind of ''[[prodigium]]'', an occurrence that signalled a disturbance of the ''[[pax deorum]]'', Rome's treaty with the gods, as Diodorus indicated.<ref>Veit Rosenberger, "Republican ''nobiles'': Controlling the ''Res Publica''," in ''A Companion to Roman Religion'' (Blackwell, 2007), p. 295.</ref> [[Livy]] records an incident during the [[Second Punic War]] when the discovery of a four-year-old hermaphrodite prompted an elaborate series of expiations: on the advice of the ''[[haruspex|haruspices]]'', the child was enclosed in a chest, carried out to sea, and allowed to drown.<ref>Livy 27.11 (using the term ''androgynus''); Rosenberger, "Republican ''nobiles''," p. 297.</ref> Other rituals followed. A hermaphrodite found in 133&nbsp;BC was drowned in the local river; executing the hermaphroditic person by drowning seems to have been the prescribed way to repair the perceived violation of the natural order.<ref>[[Julius Obsequens]] 27a ''(androgynus)''; Rosenberger, "Republican ''nobiles''," p. 298.</ref>

Pliny observed that while hermaphrodites were once considered [[Glossary of ancient Roman religion#portentum|portents]] ''(prodigia)'', in his day they had become objects of delight ''(deliciae)''; they were among the human curiosities of the sort that the wealthy might acquire at the "monsters' market" at Rome described by Plutarch.<ref>Plutarch, ''Moralia'' 520c; Dasen, "Multiple Births in Graeco-Roman Antiquity," p. 61.</ref> Under Roman law, a hermaphrodite had to be classed as either male or female; no [[third gender]] existed as a legal category.<ref>Lynn E. Roller, "The Ideology of the Eunuch Priest," ''Gender & History'' 9.3 (1997), p. 558.</ref>
{{Clear}}

==Sexual conquest and imperialism==
[[File:Aphrodisias Museum Claudius and Britannica 4638.jpg|thumb|The emperor Claudius, [[Heroic nudity|heroically nude]], overpowering the female personification of Britannia, from Aphrodisias in present-day Turkey]]
In 55&nbsp;BC, Pompeius Magnus ("[[Pompey the Great]]") opened [[Theatre of Pompey|his theater complex]] dedicated to Venus Victrix, "Venus the Conqueror".<ref>[[#Kuttner|Kuttner]], p. 343.</ref> The [[Theater of Pompey]] was in many ways the permanent monument of his [[Roman triumph|military triumph]] six years earlier. Among the displays were portrait galleries of female writers and of courtesans; a series of images illustrated freakish births that had served as war omens. In general, intellectuality and culture are represented as feminine and Hellenized, while war and politics are Roman and masculine.<ref>[[#Kuttner|Kuttner]], pp. 348–349. The birth omens are described by Pliny, ''Natural History'' 7.34, and other sources.</ref> Statues [[personification|personified]] fourteen conquered ''nationes'' ("nations, peoples") as women in ethnic or "barbarian" dress.<ref>[[#Kuttner|Kuttner]], pp. 354–346</ref><ref>[[#Penner|Penner]], pp. 122, 145.</ref>

Other monuments throughout the Empire, including the Sebasteion at [[Aphrodisias]] and the altar of the [[Sanctuary of the Three Gauls]] at [[Lugdunum]] (modern [[Lyon]], France), as well as various coins, embody conquered territories and peoples as women: Roman military power defeats a "feminized" nation.<ref>[[#Penner|Penner]], p. 134</ref><ref>[[#Potter2009|Potter (2009)]], p. 353</ref><ref>Duncan Fishwick, "The Sixty Gallic Tribes and the Altar of the Three Gauls," ''Historia'' 38.1 (1989) 111–112, thinks the 60 Gallic ''civitates'' at Lugdunum were represented by inscriptions rather than sculpture.</ref> Although the figures from Pompey's theater have not survived, relief panels from Aphrodisias include scenes such as a [[Heroic nudity|heroically nude]] [[Claudius]] forcing the submission of [[Roman Britain|Britannia]], whose [[#Breasts|right breast is bare]], and Nero dragging away a dead [[Roman Armenia|Armenia]], a composition that recalls the defeat of the [[Amazons|Amazon]] [[Penthesilea]] by [[Achilles]].<ref name="Lopez pp. 135">[[#Penner|Penner]], pp. 135–138.</ref> A particularly well-documented [[Judaea Capta coinage|series of coins depicts ''Iudaea Capta'']], a female personification of the Jewish nation as captive, issued after the [[Siege of Jerusalem (70)|destruction of the Temple of Jerusalem]] in 70&nbsp;AD.<ref>[[#Penner|Penner]], p. 121.</ref>

Sexual conquest is a metaphor widely used by the Romans for imperialism,<ref name="Lopez pp. 135"/> but not always straightforwardly for Roman domination. Horace famously described the Romans as taken captive by captive Greece: the image of Roman culture colonized from within by a civilization they had defeated but perceived as intellectually and aesthetically superior might be expressed by myths in which a man raped, abducted, or enslaved a woman but fell in love with her, as embodied for instance by [[Achilles and Briseis]].<ref>Alessandro Barchiesi, "Roman Perspectives on the Greeks", in ''The Oxford Handbook of Hellenic Studies'' (Oxford University Press, 2009), p. 104.</ref>

==See also==
{{div col|colwidth=30em}}
* [[Catamite]]
* [[Erotic art in Pompeii and Herculaneum]]
* ''[[Exoletus]]''
* [[History of erotic depictions]]
* [[History of human sexuality]]
* [[Homosexuality in ancient Rome]]
* [[Homoeroticism]]
* [[Latin profanity]]
{{div col end}}

==Notes==
{{Reflist|group="n"}}

==References==
{{reflist|30em}}

==Cited sources==
{{refbegin|2}}
* {{cite book|ref=Adams|author=Adams, J.N. |title=The Latin Sexual Vocabulary|publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press|year= 1982|isbn=978-0-8018-4106-4}}
* {{cite book|ref=Brown|author=Brown, Robert D. |title=Lucretius on Love and Sex|publisher=Brill|year= 1987}}
* {{cite book|ref=Cantarella|author=Cantarella, Eva|title=Bisexuality in the Ancient World|publisher=Yale University Press|year= 1992|isbn=978-0-300-04844-5}}
* {{cite book|ref=Clarke|url=https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520229044/looking-at-lovemaking|author=Clarke, John R.|title=Looking at Lovemaking: Constructions of Sexuality in Roman Art 100 B.C.–A.D. 250|publisher=University of California Press|year=April 2001|isbn=9780520229044|archive-url=https://archive.today/20220413224536/https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520229044/looking-at-lovemaking|archive-date=13 April 2022|access-date=13 April 2022|url-status=live}}
*{{cite book|ref=Colish|author=Colish, Marcia l.|author-link=Marcia Colish |title=The Stoic Tradition from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JokeAAAAIAAJ|year=1985|publisher=BRILL|isbn=90-04-07267-5}}
*{{cite journal|ref=Dugan|doi=10.1086/449558|jstor=1215514 |title=Preventing Ciceronianism: C. Licinius Calvus' Regimens for Sexual and Oratorical Self-Mastery|journal=Classical Philology|volume=96|issue=4|pages=400–428|year=2001|last1=Dugan|first1=John}}
* {{cite book|ref=Edwards|author=Edwards, Catharine|title=The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=1993}}
* {{cite book|ref=Fantham|author=Fantham, Elaine|chapter=''Stuprum'': Public Attitudes and Penalties for Sexual Offences in Republican Rome|title=Roman Readings: Roman Response to Greek Literature from Plautus to Statius and Quintilian|publisher=Walter de Gruyter|year= 2011}}
*{{cite book|ref=Fredrick|editor=Fredrick, David|title=The Roman Gaze: Vision, Power, and the Body|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KmVd4I2qvhwC|date=3 October 2002|publisher=JHU Press|isbn=978-0-8018-6961-7}}
* {{cite book|ref=Gaca|author=Gaca, Kathy L. |title=The Making of Fornication: Eros, Ethics and Political Reform in Greek Philosophy and Early Christianity|publisher=University of California Press|year= 2003}}
* {{cite book|ref=Gardner|author=Gardner, Jane F. |title=Women in Roman Law and Society|publisher=Indiana University Press|year= 1991}}
*{{cite book|ref=Habinek|author1=Habinek, Thomas|author-link=Thomas Habinek|author2=Schiesaro, Alessandro|title=The Roman Cultural Revolution|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EAhxUkWffHAC|date=1997|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-58092-2}}
* {{cite book|ref=Hallett|editor1=Hallett, Judith P.|editor1-link=Judith P. Hallett |editor2=Skinner, Marilyn|title=Roman Sexualities|publisher=Princeton University Press|year= 1997}}
*{{cite journal|ref=Kuttner|doi=10.2307/284436|jstor=284436|title=Culture and History at Pompey's Museum|journal=Transactions of the American Philological Association|volume=129|pages=343–373|year=1999|last1=Kuttner|first1=Ann L.}}
* {{cite book|ref=Langlands|author=Langlands, Rebecca|title=Sexual Morality in Ancient Rome|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year= 2006}}
* {{cite book|ref=McGinn1998|author=McGinn, Thomas A.J. |title=Prostitution, Sexuality and the Law in Ancient Rome|publisher=Oxford University Press|year= 1998}}
* {{cite book|ref=McGinn2004|author=McGinn, Thomas A. |title=The Economy of Prostitution in the Roman World|publisher=University of Michigan Press|year= 2004}}
* {{cite book|ref=McGinn, Thomas A.J.|title=The Economy of Prostitution in the Roman World|publisher=University of Michigan Press|year= 2004}}
* {{cite book|ref=Nussbaum|author=Nussbaum, Martha C.|chapter=The Incomplete Feminism of Musonius Rufus, Platonist, Stoic, and Roman|title=The Sleep of Reason: Erotic Experience and Sexual Ethics in Ancient Greece and Rome|url=https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780226609157|url-access=registration|publisher=University of Chicago Press|year=2002}}
*{{cite book|ref=Parker|url=http://www.persee.fr/doc/girea_0000-0000_2007_act_29_1_1002|author=Parker, H.|title=Free Women and Male Slaves, or Mandingo meets the Roman Empire|isbn=2848671696|year=2007|publisher=Presses universitaires de Franche-Comté}}
*{{cite book|ref=Penner|editor1=Penner, Todd C. Penner|editor2=Stichele, Caroline Van der|title=Mapping Gender in Ancient Religious Discourses|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2udV9fAz1UkC|year=2007|publisher=BRILL|isbn=90-04-15447-7}}
* {{cite book|ref=Phang2001|author=Phang, Sara Elise|title=The Marriage of Roman Soldiers (13 B.C.–A.D. 235): Law and Family in the Imperial Army|publisher=Brill|year= 2001}}
* {{cite book|ref=Phang2008|author=Phang|title=Roman Military Service: Ideologies of Discipline in the Late Republic and Early Principate|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year= 2008}}
*{{cite book|ref=Potter2009|editor=Potter, David S.|title=A Companion to the Roman Empire|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=g4ZmqsyC5kEC|date=2009|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|isbn=978-1-4051-9918-6}}
* {{cite book|ref=Richlin1983|author=Richlin, Amy|author-link=Amy Richlin |title=The Garden of Priapus: Sexuality and Aggression in Roman Humor|publisher=Oxford University Press|year= 1983}}
* {{cite journal|ref=Richlin1993| title=Not before Homosexuality: The Materiality of the ''cinaedus'' and the Roman Law against Love between Men | jstor=3704392|author=Richlin, Amy |journal=Journal of the History of Sexuality|volume= 3|issue=4 |year=1993|pages=523–573}}
*{{cite book|ref=Schafer1997|author=Schäfer, Peter|title=Judeophobia: Attitudes Toward the Jews in the Ancient World|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5tP5nQEACAAJ|year=1997|publisher=Harvard University Press|isbn=978-0-674-48778-9}}
*{{cite book|ref=Schafer2003|author=Peter Schäfer|title=The History of the Jews in the Greco-Roman World: The Jews of Palestine from Alexander the Great to the Arab Conquest|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-0aBAgAAQBAJ|date=2003|publisher=Routledge|isbn=1-134-40316-X}}
*{{cite book|ref=Smallwood|author=Smallwood, E. Mary|title=The Jews Under Roman Rule: From Pompey to Diocletian|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FdQUAAAAIAAJ|year=1976|publisher=Brill Archive|isbn=90-04-04491-4}}
*{{cite book|ref=Staples|author=Staples, Ariadne|title=From Good Goddess to Vestal Virgins: Sex and Category in Roman Religion|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cRS3E3u3HuAC|date=1998|publisher=Psychology Press|isbn=978-0-415-13233-6}}
*{{cite book|ref=Taylor|author=Taylor, Rabun M.|title=The Moral Mirror of Roman Art|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rCKm0OnZr0kC|date=2008|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-86612-5}}
* {{cite book|ref=Williams|author=Williams, Craig A. |title=Roman Homosexuality: Ideologies of Masculinity in Classical Antiquity|publisher=Oxford University Press|year= 1999}}
* {{cite book|ref=Younger|author=Younger, John G. |title=Sex in the Ancient World from A to Z|publisher=Routledge|year= 2005}}
{{refend}}

==Further reading==
* Ancona, Ronnie, and Greene, Ellen eds. ''Gender Dynamics in Latin Love Poetry''. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005. 
* {{cite book |last1=Hug |first1=Angela |title=Fertility, ideology, and the cultural politics of reproduction at Rome |date=2023 |publisher=Brill |location=Leiden; Boston |isbn=9789004540774}}
* Skinner, Marilyn. ''Sexuality in Greek And Roman Culture''. Blackwell Publishing. {{ISBN|978-0-631-23234-6}}.

==External links==
{{Library resources box |by=no |onlinebooks=yes |others=yes |about=yes |label=Sexuality in ancient Rome
 |viaf= |lccn= |lcheading= |wikititle= }}
* {{Commons category-inline|Sexuality in ancient Rome}}

{{bots|deny=Citation bot}}
{{Ancient Rome topics}}
{{Sex}}
{{Sexuality by country}}

[[Category:Sexuality in ancient Rome| ]]
[[Category:Society of ancient Rome]]