View source for Scientometrics

{{Short description|Quantitative study of scholarly literature}}
{{for|the journal|Scientometrics (journal)}}

'''Scientometrics''' is a subfield of [[informetrics]] that studies quantitative aspects of [[scholarly literature]].<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |last1=Gómez-Morales |first1=Yuri Jack |title=Scientometrics |encyclopedia=The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology |date=2015 |doi=10.1002/9781405165518.wbeoss057.pub2 |isbn=9781405165518}}</ref> Major research issues include the measurement of the impact of research papers and academic journals, the understanding of scientific citations, and the use of such measurements in policy and management contexts.<ref name="ScientometricsLeydesdorff">[[Loet Leydesdorff|Leydesdorff, L.]] and Milojevic, S., "Scientometrics" [https://arxiv.org/abs/1208.4566 arXiv:1208.4566] (2013), forthcoming in: Lynch, M. (editor), ''International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences'' subsection 85030. (2015)</ref> 

In practice there is a substantial overlap between scientometrics and other scientific fields such as [[information system]]s, [[information science]], [[science of science policy]], [[sociology of science]], and [[metascience]]. Critics have argued that overreliance on scientometrics has created a system of [[perverse incentives]], producing a [[publish or perish]] environment that leads to low-quality research.

== Historical development ==
<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Nalimov |first1=Vasily Vasilyevich |last2=Mulchenko |first2=B. M. |title="Scientometrics." Studies of science as a process of information. |journal=Science |date=1969 |location=Moscow, Russia}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=From the science of science to Scientometrics visualizing the history of science with HistCite software |journal=Journal of Informetrics |date=2009 |volume=3 |issue=3 |pages=173–179 |doi=10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.009 |url=http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/issispain2007.pdf |access-date=15 May 2021 |language=en |issn=1751-1577|last1=Garfield |first1=Eugene }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Валеев |first1=Д. Х. |last2=Голубцов |first2=В. Г. |script-title=ru:Юридическая Наукометрия И Цивилистические Исследования |script-journal=ru:Методологические Проблемы Цивилистических Исследований |date=2018 |pages=45–57 |url=https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36796110 |access-date=15 May 2021 |language=ru}}</ref><ref>{{cite thesis |last1=Борисов |first1=М. В. |last2=Майсуразде |first2=А. И. |title=Восстановление связей в научном рубрикаторе на основе кластеризации гетерогенной сети. |publisher=Московский государственный университет имени М. В. Ломоносова |date=2014 |url=http://www.recognition.su/wiki/images/6/62/2014_517_BorisovMV.pdf |access-date=15 May 2021}}</ref>
Modern scientometrics is mostly based on the work of [[Derek J. de Solla Price]] and [[Eugene Garfield]]. The latter created the [[Science Citation Index]]<ref name="ScientometricsLeydesdorff" /> and founded the [[Institute for Scientific Information]] which is heavily used for scientometric analysis. A dedicated academic journal, [[Scientometrics (journal)|''Scientometrics'']], was established in 1978. The industrialization of science increased the number of publications and research outcomes and the rise of the computers allowed effective analysis of this data.<ref>[[Derek de Solla Price|De Solla Price, D.]], ''editorial statement''. '''Scientometrics''' Volume 1, Issue 1 (1978)</ref> While the sociology of science focused on the behavior of scientists, scientometrics focused on the analysis of [[Publication|publications]].<ref name="ScientometricsLeydesdorff" /> Accordingly, scientometrics is also referred to as the scientific and empirical study of science and its outcomes.<ref name="papers.ssrn.com">{{cite journal | last1 = Lowry | first1 = Paul Benjamin | last2 = Romans | first2 = Denton | last3 = Curtis | first3 = Aaron | year = 2004 | title = Global journal prestige and supporting disciplines: A scientometric study of information systems journals | ssrn = 666145 | journal = Journal of the Association for Information Systems | volume = 5 | issue = 2| pages = 29–80 | doi = 10.17705/1jais.00045 | url = https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1362&context=jais | doi-access = free }}</ref><ref name="Lowry, Paul Benjamin 2013">Lowry, Paul Benjamin; Moody, Gregory D.; Gaskin, James; Galletta, Dennis F.; Humpherys, Sean; Barlow, Jordan B.; and Wilson, David W. (2013). "[https://ssrn.com/abstract=2186798 Evaluating journal quality and the Association for Information Systems (AIS) Senior Scholars' journal basket via bibliometric measures: Do expert journal assessments add value?]," MIS Quarterly (MISQ), vol. 37(4), 993–1012. Also, see a YouTube video narrative of this paper at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZQIDkA-ke0.</ref>

The [[International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics]] founded in 1993 is an association of professionals in the field.<ref>{{Cite web|title=About|url=https://www.issi-society.org/about/|access-date=2021-01-18|website=International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics|language=en}}</ref>

Later, around the turn of the century, evaluation and ranking of scientists and institutions came more into the spotlights. Based on bibliometric analysis of scientific publications and citations, the [[Academic Ranking of World Universities]] ("Shanghai ranking") was first published in 2004 by the [[Shanghai Jiao Tong University]]. [[Impact factor]]s became an important tool to choose between different journals. Rankings such as the Academic Ranking of World Universities and the [[Times Higher Education World University Rankings]] (THE-ranking) became an indicator for the status of universities. The [[H-index|''h''-index]] became an important indicator of the productivity and impact of the work of a scientist. However, alternative [[author-level metrics]] have been proposed.<ref>{{cite journal |author1=Belikov, A.V. |author2=Belikov, V.V. | year = 2015 | title = A citation-based, author- and age-normalized, logarithmic index for evaluation of individual researchers independently of publication counts | journal = F1000Research | volume = 4 | page= 884 | doi = 10.12688/f1000research.7070.1 | pmc = 4654436 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author1= Kinouchi, O.| year = 2018| title = A simple centrality index for scientific social recognition| journal = Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications|volume = 491|pages = 632–640 | doi = 10.1016/j.physa.2017.08.072 | arxiv = 1609.05273| bibcode = 2018PhyA..491..632K| s2cid = 22795899}}</ref>

Around the same time, the interest of governments in evaluating research for the purpose of assessing the impact of science funding increased. As the investments in scientific research were included as part of the U.S. [[American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009]] (ARRA), a major economic stimulus package, programs like [[STAR METRICS]] were set up to assess if the positive impact on the economy would actually occur.<ref name="Lane1">{{cite journal | last1 = Lane | first1 = J | title = Assessing the Impact of Science Funding | journal = Science | volume = 324 | year = 2009 | issue = 5932 | pages = 1273–1275 | doi = 10.1126/science.1175335 | pmid = 19498153 | s2cid = 206520769 }}</ref>

== Methods and findings ==
Methods of research include qualitative, quantitative and computational approaches. The main focus of studies have been on institutional productivity comparisons, institutional research rankings, journal rankings<ref name="papers.ssrn.com"/><ref name="Lowry, Paul Benjamin 2013"/><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Lowry | first1 = Paul Benjamin | last2 = Humphreys | first2 = Sean | last3 = Malwitz | first3 = Jason | last4 = Nix | first4 = Joshua C | year = 2007 | title = A scientometric study of the perceived quality of business and technical communication journals | ssrn = 1021608 | journal = IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication | volume = 50 | issue = 4| pages = 352–378 | doi = 10.1109/TPC.2007.908733 | s2cid = 40366182 }} Recipient of the Rudolph Joenk Award for Best Paper Published in IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication in 2007.</ref> establishing faculty productivity and tenure standards,<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Dean | first1 = Douglas L | last2 = Lowry | first2 = Paul Benjamin | last3 = Humpherys | first3 = Sean | year = 2011 | title = Profiling the research productivity of tenured information systems faculty at U.S. institutions | ssrn = 1562263 | journal = MIS Quarterly | volume = 35 | issue = 1| pages = 1–15 | doi = 10.2307/23043486 | jstor = 23043486 }}</ref> assessing the influence of top scholarly articles,<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Karuga | first1 = Gilbert G. | last2 = Lowry | first2 = Paul Benjamin | last3 = Richardson | first3 = Vernon J. | year = 2007 | title = Assessing the impact of premier information systems research over time | ssrn = 976891 | journal = Communications of the Association for Information Systems | volume = 19 | issue = 7| pages = 115–131 | doi = 10.17705/1CAIS.01907 | doi-access = free }}</ref> and developing profiles of top authors and institutions in terms of research performance.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Lowry | first1 = Paul Benjamin | last2 = Karuga | first2 = Gilbert G. | last3 = Richardson | first3 = Vernon J. | year = 2007 | title = Assessing leading institutions, faculty, and articles in premier information systems research journals | ssrn = 1021603 | journal = Communications of the Association for Information Systems | volume = 20 | issue = 16| pages = 142–203 | doi = 10.17705/1CAIS.02016 | doi-access = free }}</ref>

One significant finding in the field is a principle of cost escalation to the effect that achieving further findings at a given level of importance grow exponentially more costly in the expenditure of effort and resources. However, new algorithmic methods in search, [[machine learning]] and [[data mining]] are showing that is not the case for many information retrieval and extraction-based problems.{{Citation needed|date=September 2020}}

More recent methods rely on [[open source]] and [[open data]] to ensure transparency and reproducibility in line with modern [[open science]] requirements. For instance, the [[Unpaywall]] index and attendant research on [[open access]] trends is based on data retrieved from [[OAI-PMH]] endpoints of thousands of [[open archive]]s provided by libraries and institutions worldwide.<ref>{{cite bioRxiv |first1=Heather|last1=Piwowar|first2=Jason|last2=Priem|first3=Richard|last3=Orr|title=The Future of OA: A large-scale analysis projecting Open Access publication and readership|date=2019-10-09|biorxiv=10.1101/795310}}</ref>

Recommendations to avoid common errors in scientometrics include: select topics with sufficient data; use data mining and web scraping, combine methods, and eliminate "false positives".<ref>Jiawei, H., Kamber, M., Han, J., Kamber, M., Pei, J. 2012. Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, Wlatham, EE.UU.</ref><ref>{{cite journal | doi=10.33412/idt.v14.1.1807 | title=Extracción de datos de perfiles en Google Scholar utilizando un algoritmo en el lenguaje R para hacer minería de datos | year=2018 | last1=Quintero | first1=Erika | last2=Saavedra | first2=Dalys | last3=Murillo | first3=Danny | journal=I+D Tecnológico | volume=14 | pages=94–104 | s2cid=165340425 | doi-access=free }}</ref> It is also necessary to understand the limits of search engines (e.g. Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar) which fail to index thousands of studies in small journals and underdeveloped countries.<ref>{{cite journal | doi=10.7818/ECOS.2256 | title=Cómo aplicar la cienciometría a la investigación ecológica | year=2021 | last1=Añino Ramos | first1=Yostin Jesús | last2=Monge Najera | first2=Julian | last3=Murillo-Gonzalez | first3=Danny | last4=Michán-Aguirre | first4=Layla | journal=Ecosistemas | volume=30 | issue=2 | pages=1–4 | s2cid=238733389 | doi-access=free }}</ref>

==Common scientometric indexes==
Indexes may be classified as [[article-level metrics]], [[author-level metrics]], and [[journal-level metrics]] depending on which feature they evaluate.

===Impact factor===
{{Main article|Impact factor}}
The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an [[academic journal]] is a measure reflecting the yearly average number of [[citation]]s to recent articles published in that journal. It is frequently used as a [[proxy (statistics)|proxy]] for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher impact factors are often deemed to be more important than those with lower ones. The impact factor was devised by [[Eugene Garfield]], the founder of the [[Institute for Scientific Information]] (ISI).

===Science Citation Index===
{{Main article|Science Citation Index}}
The Science Citation Index (SCI) is a [[citation index]] originally produced by the [[Institute for Scientific Information]] (ISI) and created by [[Eugene Garfield]]. It was officially launched in 1964. It is now owned by [[Clarivate Analytics]] (previously the Intellectual Property and Science business of [[Thomson Reuters]]).<ref name=dimension>
{{cite journal
 |last1=Garfield |first1=E.
 |year=1955
 |title=Citation Indexes for Science: A New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas
 |journal=[[Science (journal)|Science]]
 |volume=122 |issue=3159 |pages=108–111
 |bibcode=1955Sci...122..108G
 |doi=10.1126/science.122.3159.108
 |pmid=14385826
}}</ref><ref name=evolve>
{{cite journal
 |last=Garfield |first=Eugene
 |year=2011
 |title=The evolution of the Science Citation Index
 |url=http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/barcelona2007a.pdf
 |journal=[[International Microbiology]]
 |volume=10 |issue=1 |pages=65–69
 |doi=10.2436/20.1501.01.10
|pmid=17407063
 }}</ref><ref name=gOverview>
{{cite web
 |last=Garfield |first=Eugene
 |date=1963
 |title=Science Citation Index
 |url=http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/80.pdf
 |website=University of Pennsylvania Garfield Library
 |pages=v–xvi
 |access-date=2013-05-27
}}</ref><ref name=history-cite-indexing>
{{cite web
 |date=November 2010
 |title=History of Citation Indexing
 |url=https://clarivate.com/essays/history-citation-indexing/
 |publisher=[[Clarivate Analytics]]
 |access-date=2010-11-04
}}</ref> The larger version (Science Citation Index Expanded) covers more than 8,500 notable and significant [[Scientific journal|journals]], across 150 disciplines, from 1900 to the present. These are alternatively described as the world's leading journals of [[science]] and [[technology]], because of a rigorous selection process.<ref name=Expanded>
{{cite web
 |url=https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en/products-services/scholarly-scientific-research/scholarly-search-and-discovery/science-citation-index-expanded.html
 |title=Science Citation Index Expanded
 |access-date=2017-01-17
}}</ref><ref name=wetland>
{{cite journal
 |last1=Ma |first1=Jiupeng
 |last2=Fu |first2=Hui-Zhen
 |last3=Ho |first3=Yuh-Shan
 |date=December 2012
 |title=The Top-cited Wetland Articles in Science Citation Index Expanded: characteristics and hotspots
 |journal=[[Environmental Earth Sciences]]
 |volume=70|issue=3|page=1039
 |bibcode=2009EnGeo..56.1247D
 |doi=10.1007/s12665-012-2193-y
|s2cid=18502338
 }}</ref><ref name=shan>
{{cite journal
 |last1=Ho |first1=Yuh-Shan
 |year=2012
 |title=The top-cited research works in the Science Citation Index Expanded
 |url=http://trend.asia.edu.tw/Publications/PDF/Scientometrics94,%201297.pdf
 |journal=[[Scientometrics (journal)|Scientometrics]]
 |volume=94 |issue=3 |page=1297
 |doi=10.1007/s11192-012-0837-z
|s2cid=1301373
 }}</ref>

===Acknowledgment index===
{{Main article|Acknowledgment index}}

An acknowledgment index (British acknowledgement index)<ref name="gram">{{Cite web |date=22 September 2012 |title=Acknowledgement vs. Acknowledgment |url=http://grammarist.com/spelling/acknowledgment-acknowledgement/}}</ref> is a method for [[Bibliographic index|indexing]] and analyzing acknowledgments in the [[scientific literature]] and, thus, quantifies the impact of [[acknowledgment (creative arts)|acknowledgments]]. Typically, a scholarly article has a section in which the authors acknowledge entities such as funding, technical staff, colleagues, etc. that have contributed materials or knowledge or have influenced or inspired their work. Like a [[citation index]], it measures influences on scientific work, but in a different sense; it measures institutional and economic influences as well as informal influences of individual people, ideas, and artifacts.
Unlike the impact factor, it does not produce a single overall metric, but analyzes the components separately. However, the total number of acknowledgments to an acknowledged entity can be measured and so can the number of citations to the papers in which the acknowledgment appears. The ratio of this total number of citations to the total number of papers in which the acknowledge entity appears can be construed as the impact of that acknowledged entity.<ref>{{cite conference |doi=10.1145/1088622.1088627 |title=Automatic acknowledgement indexing: expanding the semantics of contribution in the CiteSeer digital library |book-title=Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Knowledge capture |conference=K-CAP '05 |pages=19–26 |year=2005 |last1=Councill |first1=Isaac G. |last2=Giles |first2=C. Lee |author-link2=Lee Giles |last3=Han |first3=Hui |last4=Manavoglu |first4=Eren |isbn=1-59593-163-5 |citeseerx=10.1.1.59.1661}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1073/pnas.0407743101 |pmid=15601767 |title=Who gets acknowledged: Measuring scientific contributions through automatic acknowledgment indexing |journal=[[Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.]] |volume=101 |issue=51 |pages=17599–17604 |date=December 15, 2004 |last1=Giles |first1=C. L. |author-link1=Lee Giles |last2=Councill |first2=I. G. |bibcode=2004PNAS..10117599G |url=http://clgiles.ist.psu.edu/papers/PNAS-2004-Acknowledgements.pdf|pmc=539757 |doi-access=free }}</ref>

== Altmetrics ==
{{Main|Altmetrics}}
In scholarly and scientific publishing, altmetrics are nontraditional [[bibliometrics]]<ref name="PLOSCollections">{{cite web|title=PLOS Collections|url=http://collections.plos.org/altmetrics|website=[[PLOS|Public Library of Science (PLOS)]]|date=3 November 2021 |quote=Altmetrics is the study and use of nontraditional scholarly impact measures that are based on activity in web-based environments}}</ref> proposed as an alternative<ref>"The "alt" does indeed stand for "alternative"" Jason Priem, leading author in the [http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/ Altmetrics Manifesto] [http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/#comment-592 comment 592]</ref> or complement<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|last1=Haustein|first1=Stefanie|last2=Peters|first2=Isabella|last3=Sugimoto|first3=Cassidy R.|author3-link=Cassidy Sugimoto|last4=Thelwall|first4=Mike|last5=Larivière|first5=Vincent|date=2014-04-01|title=Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature|journal=Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology|language=en|volume=65|issue=4|pages=656–669|arxiv=1308.1838|doi=10.1002/asi.23101|issn=2330-1643|s2cid=11113356}}</ref> to more traditional [[citation impact]] metrics, such as [[impact factor]] and [[H-index|''h''-index]].<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Chavda|first1=Janica|last2=Patel|first2=Anika|date=30 December 2015|title=Measuring research impact: bibliometrics, social media, altmetrics, and the BJGP|journal=British Journal of General Practice|volume=66|issue=642|pages=e59–e61|doi=10.3399/bjgp16X683353|pmc=4684037|pmid=26719483}}</ref> The term altmetrics was proposed in 2010,<ref name="Altmetrics-Manifesto-2011">{{cite journal|last1=Priem|first1=Jason|last2=Taraborelli|first2=Dario|last3=Groth|first3=Paul|last4=Neylon|first4=Cameron|date=September 28, 2011|title=Altmetrics: A manifesto (v 1.01)|url=http://altmetrics.org/manifesto|journal=Altmetrics}}</ref> as a generalization of [[article level metrics]],<ref name="UCBerkeley-BinfieldTalk-2009">{{cite web|last1=Binfield|first1=Peter|date=9 November 2009|title=Article-Level Metrics at PLoS - what are they, and why should you care?|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z05j5fsVfHA |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211212/Z05j5fsVfHA| archive-date=2021-12-12 |url-status=live|website=[[University of California, Berkeley]]|format=Video}}{{cbignore}}</ref> and has its roots in the #altmetrics [[hashtag]]. Although altmetrics are often thought of as metrics about articles, they can be applied to people, journals, books, data sets, presentations, videos, source code repositories, web pages, etc. Altmetrics use public APIs across platforms to gather data with open scripts and algorithms. Altmetrics did not originally cover [[citation]] counts,<ref name="OpeningScience-2014">{{cite book|last1=Bartling|first1=Sönke|url=https://archive.org/details/springer_10.1007-978-3-319-00026-8|title=Opening Science: The Evolving Guide on How the Internet Is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing|last2=Friesike|first2=Sascha|date=2014|publisher=Springer International Publishing|isbn=978-3-31-900026-8|location=Cham|page=[https://archive.org/details/springer_10.1007-978-3-319-00026-8/page/n179 181]|doi=10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8|oclc=906269135|quote=Altmetrics and article-level metrics are sometimes used interchangeably, but there are important differences: article-level metrics also include citations and usage data; ...}}</ref> but calculate scholar impact based on diverse online research output, such as social media, online news media, online reference managers and so on.<ref name="IEEESpectrum-MeasuringImpact-2012">{{cite journal|last1=Mcfedries|first1=Paul|date=August 2012|title=Measuring the impact of altmetrics [Technically Speaking]|journal=IEEE Spectrum|volume=49|issue=8|page=28|doi=10.1109/MSPEC.2012.6247557|issn=0018-9235}}</ref><ref name="SerialsReview-Rethinking-2013">{{cite journal|last1=Galligan|first1=Finbar|last2=Dyas-Correia|first2=Sharon|date=March 2013|title=Altmetrics: Rethinking the Way We Measure|journal=Serials Review|volume=39|issue=1|pages=56–61|doi=10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003}}</ref> It demonstrates both the impact and the detailed composition of the impact.<ref name="Altmetrics-Manifesto-2011" /> Altmetrics could be applied to research filter,<ref name="Altmetrics-Manifesto-2011" /> promotion and tenure dossiers, grant applications<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Moher|first1=David|last2=Naudet|first2=Florian|last3=Cristea|first3=Ioana A.|last4=Miedema|first4=Frank|last5=Ioannidis|first5=John P. A.|last6=Goodman|first6=Steven N.|date=2018-03-29|title=Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure|journal=PLOS Biology|language=en|volume=16|issue=3|pages=e2004089|doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089|issn=1545-7885|pmc=5892914|pmid=29596415 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{Cite conference |first=Rajiv|last=Nariani|date=2017-03-24|title=Supplementing Traditional Ways of Measuring Scholarly Impact: The Altmetrics Way |book-title=ACRL 2017 Conference Proceedings |language=en|hdl=10315/33652}}</ref> and for ranking newly published articles in [[List of academic databases and search engines|academic search engines]].<ref name=":6">{{cite conference|last1=Mehrazar|first1=Maryam|last2=Kling|first2=Christoph Carl|last3=Lemke|first3=Steffen|last4=Mazarakis|first4=Athanasios|last5=Peters|first5=Isabella|date=2018-04-08|title=Can We Count on Social Media Metrics? First Insights into the Active Scholarly Use of Social Media|page=215|arxiv=1804.02751|doi=10.1145/3201064.3201101|isbn=978-1-4503-5563-6|doi-access=free|book-title=Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science}}</ref>

== Criticisms ==

Critics have argued that overreliance on scientometrics has created a [[publish or perish]] environment with [[perverse incentives]] that lead to low-quality research.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Roche|first=Christopher|date=2022-08-31|title=The research conduct spectrum for surgeons: your career in their rule bending hands?|journal=Bull Roy Coll Surg Engl|volume=104|issue=6|pages=274–277 |doi=10.1308/rcsbull.2022.112|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Weingart|first=Peter|date=2005-01-01|title=Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences?|journal=Scientometrics|volume=62|issue=1|pages=117–131|doi=10.1007/s11192-005-0007-7|s2cid=12359334|issn=0138-9130}}</ref>

== In popular culture ==
The main character in [[Michael Frayn]]’s  novel [[Skios]] is a Professor of Scientometrics.

== See also ==
{{Div col|colwidth=20em}}
* [[Academic careerism]]
* [[Author-level metrics]]
* [[Citation analysis]]
* [[College and university rankings]]
* [[Erdős number]]
* [[Eigenfactor]]
* [[Expert elicitation]]
* [[Goodhart's law]]
* [[Journal ranking]]
* [[Journalology]]
* [[Lists of science and technology awards]]
* [[Peer review]]
* {{slink|Semantic Web#Applications}}
* [[SCImago Journal Rank]]
* [[Scopus]]
* [[Research Integrity Risk Index]]
* [[Semantic Scholar]]
* [[Science of science]]
{{Div col end}}

===Journals===
* ''[[Scientometrics (journal)|Scientometrics]]''
* ''[[Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology]]''
* ''[[Journal of Informetrics]]''

== References and footnotes ==
{{reflist}}

== External links ==
* {{cite journal | last1 = Harnad | first1 = S. | author-link = Stevan Harnad | year = 2009 | title = Open Access Scientometrics and the UK Research Assessment Exercise | url = http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/17142/ | journal = Scientometrics | volume = 79 | issue = 1 | doi = 10.1007/s11192-009-0409-z | pages=147–156| arxiv = cs/0703131 | citeseerx = 10.1.1.561.7204 | s2cid = 3183215 }}
* {{cite journal | last1 = Harnad | first1 = S | year = 2008 | title = Validating Research Performance Metrics Against Peer Rankings | url = http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/15619/ | journal = Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics | volume = 8 | issue = 11 | pages = 103–107 | doi = 10.3354/esep00088 | doi-access = free }}
* ''[http://scimaps.org// The Places & Spaces: Mapping Science]'' exhibit at the [[American Museum of Science and Energy]], September 7, 2007 – January 7, 2008.
* [https://academic.oup.com/gigascience/article/8/6/giz053/5506490 Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action] GigaScience, Volume 8, Issue 6, June 2019

{{Science and technology studies|state=collapsed}}
{{Academic publishing|state=collapsed}}
{{Authority control}}

[[Category:Bibliometrics]]
[[Category:Science policy]]
[[Category:Library science]]
[[Category:Metascience]]