View source for Russian orthography

{{Short description|Type of orthography}}
{{See also|Russian phonology|Russian cursive}}
{{More footnotes|date=February 2023}}{{IPA notice}}
{{main|Russian language}}

[[File:Modern russian orthography.jpg|thumb|Modern Russian orthography.]]
'''Russian orthography''' ({{Lang-rus|правописа́ние|pravopisaniye|prəvəpʲɪˈsanʲɪjə|links=yes}}) is an [[orthography|orthographic tradition]] formally considered to encompass [[spelling]] ({{lang-rus|орфогра́фия|r=orfografiya|p=ɐrfɐˈɡrafʲɪjə}}) and [[punctuation]] ({{lang-rus|пунктуа́ция|r=punktuatsiya|p=pʊnktʊˈat͡sɨjə}}). Russian spelling, which is mostly phonemic in practice, is a mix of ''morphological'' and ''phonetic'' principles, with a few ''etymological'' or ''historic'' forms, and occasional ''grammatical'' differentiation. The punctuation, originally based on [[Medieval Greek|Byzantine Greek]], was in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries reformulated on the models of [[French orthography|French]] and [[German orthography|German]] orthography.

The [[Help:IPA/Russian|IPA transcription]] attempts to reflect [[Vowel reduction in Russian|vowel reduction]] when not under [[stress (linguistics)|stress]]. The sounds that are presented are those of the standard language; other dialects may have noticeably different pronunciations for the vowels.

==Spelling==
Russian is written with a modern [[Russian alphabet|variant]] of the [[Cyrillic script]]. Russian spelling typically avoids arbitrary [[digraph (orthography)|digraphs]]. Except for the use of [[hard sign|hard]] and [[soft sign|soft]] signs, which have no phonetic value in isolation but can follow a consonant letter, no [[phoneme]] is ever represented with more than one letter.

===Morphological principle===
Under the morphological principle, the [[morpheme]]s (roots, suffixes, infixes, and inflexional endings) are attached without modification; the compounds may be further agglutinated.  For example, the long adjective шарикоподшипниковый, sharikopodshipnikoviy {{IPA|[ʂa.rʲɪ.kə.pɐtˈʂɨ.pnʲɪ.kə.vɨj]}} ('pertaining to ball bearings'), may be decomposed as follows (words having independent existence '''in boldface'''):

{| align="center" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="4" style="text-align: center"
|-
| '''шар'''<br> {{IPA|/ˈʂar/}} || ик<br>{{IPA|/ik/}} || o<br>{{IPA|/o/}} || '''под'''<br>{{IPA|/pod/}} || '''шип'''<br>{{IPA|/ˈʂip/}} || ник<br>{{IPA|/nʲik/}} || ов<br>{{IPA|/ov/}} || ый<br>{{IPA|/ij/}}
|-
| 'sphere' || diminutive suffix || connecting interfix || 'under'<br>(preposition or prefix) || 'pin' || suffix indicating subject, intended for what is called by the stem (thus 'something to lay under pin')|| adjectival suffix of property or innateness|| inflexional ending, [[nominative]] [[masculine]] [[Grammatical number|singular]] ending of adjectives
|-
|-
| colspan=2 | '''шарик'''<br>{{IPA|[ˈʂa.rʲɪk]}}<br>'little sphere', 'ball' || о<br>&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;
| colspan=3 | '''подшипник'''<br>{{IPA|[pɐtˈʂɨ.pnʲɪk]}}<br>'bearing' || ов<br>&nbsp;<br>&nbsp; || ый<br>&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;
|-
| colspan=6 | '''шарикоподшипник'''<br>{{IPA|[ʂa.rʲɪ.kə.pɐtˈʂɨ.pnʲɪk]}}<br>'ball bearing'
| colspan=2 | овый<br>&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;
|-
| colspan=8 | '''шарикоподшипниковый'''<br>{{IPA|[ʂa.rʲɪ.kə.pɐtˈʂɨ.pnʲɪ.kə.vɨj]}}<br>'pertaining to ball bearings'
|}

Note again that each component in the final production retains its basic form, despite the vowel reduction.

The phonetic assimilation of consonant clusters also does not usually violate the morphological principle of the spelling.  For example, the decomposition of счастье {{IPA|[ˈɕːa.sʲtʲjɪ]}} ('happiness, good fortune') is as follows:

{| align=center cellpadding=6   style="text-align: center"
|-
| '''с''' || '''часть''' || е
|- 
| {{IPA|/s/}} || {{IPA|/t͡ɕasʲtʲ/}} || {{IPA|/&nbsp;jə/}}
|-
| 'good'<br>(< *sъ- (good), as in A.-Indian su - good) || 'part' (here in the related meaning 'fate') || (ending of abstract noun of state - Neutral Sing. Nom.)
|}

Note the assimilation with {{angbr|сч}}- so that it represents the same sound (or cluster) as {{angbr|щ}}-. The spelling <щастие> was fairly common among the literati in the eighteenth century, but is usually frowned upon today.

===Phonetic principle===
The phonetic principle implies that:
* all morphemes are written as they are pronounced in isolation, ''without vowel reduction'', [[Church Slavonic]] style, or, more strictly, taking inflexion into account (this in combination with the morphological agglutination described above is sometimes called the morphemic principle);
* certain prefixes that end in a voiced consonant (in practice, only those in -{{angbr|з}} {{IPA|/z/}}) have that consonant devoiced (become {{IPA|[s]}}) to voicing assimilation.  This may be reflected orthographically.  For example, for the prefix/preposition ''без'' {{IPA|[bʲez]}} 'without':

{| align=center cellpadding=6
|-
| '''без'''умный || {{IPA|[bʲɪˈzu.mnɨj]}} || 'mindless', 'mad' (ум {{IPA|[um]}} 'mind')
|-
| '''бес'''смертный || {{IPA|[bʲɪsˈsmʲe.rtnɨj]}} || 'immortal' (смерть {{IPA|[smʲertʲ]}} 'death')
|}

* certain roots and prefixes occasionally have their vowel modified in individual cases to reflect historical changes in pronunciation, usually as a result of being unstressed or, conversely, stressed.  In practice, this usually applies to -{{angbr|o}}- {{IPA|/o/}} changing to -{{angbr|a}}- {{IPA|[ɐ]}} or {{IPA|[ə]}} (''[[akanye]]''), and alternations between the allophonic vowels {{IPA|[ɨ]}} and {{IPA|[i]}} (represented by {{angbr|ы}} and {{angbr|и}} respectively):
{| align=center cellpadding=6
|-
|'''рост''' || {{IPA|[rost]}} || 'growth'
|-
| '''расти''' || {{IPA|[rɐˈsʲtʲi]}} || 'to grow'
|-
|'''история''' || {{IPA|[ɪˈsto.rʲɪ.jə]}} || 'history'
|-
| '''предыстория''' || {{IPA|[prʲɪ.dɨˈsto.rʲɪ.jə]}} || 'prehistory'
|}

* borrowed words and foreign names are usually spelled as [[orthographic transcription]]s, or, more precisely, mixed transcriptions-transliterations based mainly on original pronunciation ([[Jacques-Yves Cousteau]] is rendered in Russian as Жак-Ив Кусто; the English name Paul is rendered as Пол, the French name Paul as Поль, the German name Paul as Пауль) but also on original spelling (the German surnames Schmied, Schmidt, Schmitt are rendered in Russian as Шмид, Шмидт, Шмитт). In particular, double consonants are usually retained from original spelling when their pronunciation is not normally geminated. In addition, unpalatalized consonants are usually followed by {{angbr|е}} rather than {{angbr|э}} (e.g. кафе {{IPA|[kɐˈfɛ]}},'café'); 19th-century linguists, such as [[Yakov Karlovich Grot]], considered unpalatalized pronunciation of consonants before {{IPA|/e/}} to be foreign to Russian, though this has now become the standard for many loanwords.

Pronunciation may also deviate from normal phonological rules.  For example, unstressed {{IPA|/o/}} (spelled {{angbr|о}}) is usually pronounced {{IPA|[ɐ]}} or {{IPA|[ə]}}, but радио ('radio') is pronounced {{IPA|[ˈra.dʲɪ.o]}}, with an unstressed final {{IPA|[o]}}.

===Etymological principle===
The fact that Russian has retained much of its ancient phonology has made the historical or etymological principle (dominant in languages like English, French, and Irish) less relevant.  Because the spelling has been adjusted to reflect the changes in the pronunciation of the [[yer]]s and to eliminate letters with identical pronunciation,  the only systematic examples occur in some foreign words and in some of the inflectional endings, both nominal and verbal, which are not always written as they are pronounced. For example:

{| align=center cellpadding=6
|-
| '''русского''' || {{IPA|[ˈru.skə.və]}}  <br>'''not''' {{IPA|*[ˈru.sko.ɡo]}} || 'of the Russian' <br>(adj. masculine/neuter genitive singular)
|}

===Grammatical principle===
The '''grammatical''' principle has become stronger in contemporary Russian.  It specifies conventional orthographic forms to mark grammatic distinctions (gender, participle vs. adjective, and so on).  Some of these rules are ancient, and could perhaps be considered etymological; some are based in part on subtle, and not necessarily universal, distinctions in pronunciation; and some are practically arbitrary.  Some characteristic examples follow.

For nouns ending in a sibilant -{{angbr|ж}} {{IPA|/ʐ/}}, -{{angbr|ш}} {{IPA|/ʂ/}}, -{{angbr|щ}} {{IPA|/ɕː/}}, -{{angbr|ч}} {{IPA|/t͡ɕ/}}, a [[soft sign]] {{angbr|ь}} is appended in the nominative singular if the gender is feminine, and is not appended if masculine:
{| align=center cellpadding=6
|-
| '''дочь''' || {{IPA|[dot͡ɕ]}} || daughter '''F''' || -
|-
| '''меч''' || {{IPA|[mʲet͡ɕ]}} || sword '''M''' || -
|-
| '''грач''' || {{IPA|[ɡrat͡ɕ]}} || rook (''Corvus frugilegus'') '''M''' || modern levelling; [[Mikhail Lomonosov|Lomonosov]] (1755) gives ''грачь''
|}
: Neither of the aforementioned consonants has phonemically distinct [[Palatalization (phonetics)|palatalized]] and unpalatalized variants. Hence, the use of {{angbr|ь}} in these examples is not to indicate a different pronunciation, but to help distinguish different grammatical genders. A common noun ending in a consonant without -{{angbr|ь}} is masculine while a noun ending in -{{angbr|ь}} is often feminine (though  there are some masculine nouns ending in a "soft" consonant, with the -{{angbr|ь}} marking a different pronunciation).
: Though based on common ancient etymology, by which a hard sign '''ъ''' was appended to masculine nouns before 1918, both symbols having once been pronounced as ultra-short ("reduced") vowels (called ''[[yer]]s'' in Slavic studies), the modern rule is nevertheless grammatical, because its application has been made more nearly universal.

The past passive participle has a doubled -{{angbr|'''нн'''}}- {{IPA|/nn/}}, while the same word used as an adjective has a single -{{angbr|'''[[н]]'''}}- {{IPA|/n/}}:
{| align=center cellpadding=6
|-
| '''варёный''' || {{IPA|[vɐˈrʲɵ.nɨj]}} || 'cooked/boiled'
|-
| '''варенный''' || {{IPA|[ˈva.rʲɪn.nɨj]}} || '(something that has) been cooked/boiled'
|-
| '''жареный''' || {{IPA|[ˈʐa.rʲɪ.nɨj]}} || 'fried'
|-
| '''жаренный''' || {{IPA|[ˈʐa.rʲɪn.nɨj]}} || '(something that has) been fried'
|}
:This rule is partly guided by pronunciation, but the geminated pronunciation is not universal. The rule is therefore considered one of the difficult points of Russian spelling, since the distinction between adjective (implying state) and participle (implying action) is not always clear. A proposal in the late 1990s to simplify this rule by basing the distinction on whether or not the verb is transitive has not been formally adopted.

Prepositional phrases in which the literal meaning is preserved are written with the words separated; when used adverbially, especially if the meaning has shifted, they are usually written as a single word:
{| align=center cellpadding=6
|-
| '''во время (чего-либо)''' || {{IPA|[vɐ ˈvrʲe.mʲə]}} || 'during the time (of something)'
|-
| '''(он пришёл) вовремя''' || {{IPA|[ˈvovrʲɪmʲə]}} || '(he arrived) on time'
|}
: (This is extracted from a whole set of extremely detailed rules about run-together, hyphenated, or separated components. Such rules are essentially arbitrary.  There are enough sub-cases, exceptions, undecidable points, and inconsistencies that even well-educated native speakers sometimes have to check in a dictionary.  Arguments about this issue have been continuous for 150 years.)

==Punctuation==
{{See also|Rules of Russian Orthography and Punctuation}}

===Basic symbols===
The [[full stop]] (period) (.), [[colon (punctuation)|colon]] (:), [[semicolon]] (;), [[comma (punctuation)|comma]] (,), [[question mark]] (?), [[exclamation mark]] (!), and [[ellipsis]] (…) are equivalent in shape to the basic symbols of punctuation (знаки препинания {{IPA|[ˈznakʲɪ prʲɪpʲɪˈnanʲɪjə]}}) used for the common [[Europe]]an languages, and follow the same general principles of usage.
 
The colon is used exclusively as a means of introduction, and never, as in slightly archaic English, to mark a periodic pause intermediate in strength between the semicolon and the full stop (period) (cf. H.W. Fowler, ''The Kingˈs English'', 1908).

===Comma usage===
The comma is used very liberally to mark the end of introductory phases, on either side of simple [[apposition]]s, and to introduce all [[subordinate clause]]s.  The English [[restrictiveness|distinction between restrictive and non-restrictive clauses]] does not exist:

{| align=center cellpadding=6   style="text-align:center"
|-
| Итак, царя свергли!  || So the tsar has been overthrown!
|-
| Мужчина, которого вы вчера сбили, умер. || The man you ran over yesterday has died.
|-
| Это странное явление, о котором так часто пишут в газетах, так и остаётся без научного объяснения. || This strange phenomenon, which is so often reported in the press, remains unexplained by science.
|}

===Hyphenation===
The [[hyphen]]&nbsp;(-), and [[em dash]]&nbsp;(&mdash;) are used to mark increasing levels of separation.  The hyphen is put between components of a word, and the em-dash to separate words in a sentence, in particular to mark longer appositions or qualifications that in English would typically be put in parentheses, and as a replacement for a [[copula (linguistics)|copula]]:

{| align=center cellpadding=6 style="text-align:center"
|-
| Наш телефон: 242-01-42. || Our telephone: 242-0142.  ''or'' Our telephone is 242-0142.
|-
| Без сильной команды — такой, которую в прошлом собирал и тренировал Тихонов — Россия не взяла золотую медаль на Олимпиаде-2002. || Without a strong team — like the one that Tikhonov in the past selected and trained — Russia did not win the gold medal at the 2002 Olympics.
|}

In short sentences describing a noun (but generally not a pronoun unless special poetic emphasis is desired) in present tense (as a substitution for a [[modal verb]] "быть/есть" (to be)):

{| align=center cellpadding=6 style="text-align:center"
|-
| Мой брат — инженер, его начальник — негодяй. Этот дом — памятник архитектуры (''but: Я студент, он водитель.'').
|| My brother is an engineer, his boss is a scoundrel. This building is an architectural landmark. ('I am a student, he is a driver.')
|}

===Direct speech===
[[Quotation mark, non-English usage|Quotes]] are not used to mark paragraphed direct quotation, which is instead separated out by the em-dash (&mdash;):

{| align=center cellpadding=6 style="text-align:center"
|-
| &mdash;&nbsp; Я Вас обожаю!&nbsp;&mdash; сказал мишка лисе.  || 'I adore you!' said the bear to the fox.
|}

===Quotation===
Inlined direct speech and other quotation is marked at the first level by [[guillemet]]s&nbsp;«»<!-- an alternative name is «[double] angle QUOTES», never call this ⟨angle brackets⟩! -->, and by lowered and raised reversed double quotes („“) at the second:

{| align=center cellpadding=6   style="text-align:center"
|-
| {{lang|ru|Гончаров начинает «Фрегат „Паллада“» словами: «Меня удивляет».|italic=no}}  || 'Goncharov begins his "Frigate ''Pallada''" with the words: "I am surprised."'
|}

Unlike [[American English]], the period or other terminal punctuation is placed ''outside'' the quotation.  As the example above demonstrates, the quotes are often used to mark the names of entities introduced with the generic word.

===Parenthetical expressions===
These are introduced with the international symbol of [[parentheses]]&nbsp;(). However, their use is typically restricted to pure [[aside]]s, rather than, as in English, to mark [[apposition]].

==Controversies==

===Spelling===
As in many languages, the spelling was formerly quite more phonemic and less consistent.  However, the influence of the major grammarians, from [[Meletius Smotrytsky]] (1620s) to [[Mikhail Lomonosov|Lomonosov]] (1750s) to [[Yakov Grot|Grot]] (1880s), ensured a more careful application of morphology and etymology.

Today, the balance between the morphological and phonetic principles is well established.  The etymological inflexions are maintained by tradition and habit, although their non-phonetic spelling has occasionally prompted controversial calls for reform (as in the periods 1900–1910, 1960–1964).  A primary area where the spelling is utterly inconsistent and therefore controversial is:
* the complexity (or even correctness) of some of the grammatical principles, especially with respect to the strung-together, hyphenated, or disjoint writing of the constituent morphemes.

These two points have been the topic of scientific debate since at least the middle of the nineteenth century.

In the past, uncertainty abounded about which of the ordinary or iotated/palatalizing [[Russian language#Sounds|series of vowels]] to allow after the sibilant consonants {{angbr|ж}} {{IPA|[ʐ]}}, {{angbr|ш}} {{IPA|[ʂ]}}, {{angbr|щ}} {{IPA|[ɕ:]}}, {{angbr|ц}} {{IPA|[ts]}}, {{angbr|ч}} {{IPA|[tɕ]}}, which, as mentioned [[#Grammatical principle|above]], are not standard in their [[Russian language#Consonants|hard/soft pairs]].  This problem, however, appears to have been resolved by applying the phonetic and grammatical principles (and to a lesser extent, the etymological) to define a complicated though internally consistent set of [[spelling rule]]s.

In 2000–2001, a minor revision of the 1956 codification was proposed.  It met with public protest and has not been formally adopted.

==1918 Bolshevik reform==
{{main|Reforms of Russian orthography}}
[[File:Cyrillic letter Yat.png|250px|right|thumb|The Old Cyrillic letter 'yat']]
Russian orthography was simplified by unifying several adjectival and pronominal inflections, conflating the letter '''{{lang|ru-petr1708|ѣ}}''' ([[Yat]]) with '''{{lang|ru-luna1918|е}}''', '''{{lang|ru-petr1708|ѳ}}''' with '''{{lang|ru-luna1918|ф}}''', and '''{{lang|ru-petr1708|і}}''' and '''{{lang|ru-petr1708|ѵ}}''' with '''{{lang|ru-luna1918|и}}'''.  Additionally, the archaic mute ''yer'' became obsolete, including the '''{{lang|ru-petr1708|ъ}}''' (the "[[hard sign]]") in final position following consonants (thus eliminating practically the last graphical remnant of the Old Slavonic [[Law of open syllables|open-syllable system]]). For instance, {{lang|ru-petr1708|Рыбинскъ}} became {{lang|ru-luna1918|Рыбинск}} ("[[Rybinsk]]").

Examples:
* ''{{lang|ru|Сѣверо-Американскіе Соединенные Штаты}}'' to ''{{lang|ru|Северо-Американские Соединённые Штаты}}'' – The United States of America ({{lit| North American United States}}, popular pre-revolutionary name of the United States in Russia)
* ''{{lang|ru|Россія}}'' to ''{{lang|ru|Россия}}''
* ''{{lang|ru|Петроградъ}}'' to ''{{lang|ru|Петроград}}'' ([[Saint Petersburg|Petrograd]]) 
* ''{{lang|ru|раіонъ}}'' to ''{{lang|ru|район}}'' (region/district) 
* ''{{lang|ru|мараѳонъ}}'' to ''{{lang|ru|марафон}}'' (marathon) 
* ''{{lang|ru|дѣти}}'' to ''{{lang|ru|дети}}'' (children) 
* ''{{lang|ru|Іисусъ Христосъ}}'' to ''{{lang|ru|Иисус Христос}}'' ([[Jesus|Jesus Christ]])

===Practical implementation===
[[File:Старинная печатная машинка Continental.jpg|thumb|left|An old typewriter with the 'banned letters' removed]] 
In December 1917, the [[People's Commissariat for Education|People's Commissariat of Education]], headed by [[A. V. Lunacharsky]], issued a decree stating, "All state and government institutions and schools without exception should carry out the transition to the new orthography without delay. From 1 January 1918, all government and state publications, both periodical and non-periodical were to be printed in the new style."<ref name="ComrieEtAl1996">{{cite book |last=Comrie |first1=Bernard |last2=Stone |first2=Gerald |last3=Polinsky |first3=Maria |title=The Russian Language in the Twentieth Century |edition=2nd |location=Wotton-under-Edge, England |publisher=Clarendon Press |year=1996 |isbn=978-0198240662 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/russianlanguagei00comr }}</ref><ref name="Chernyshev1947">{{cite book |last=Чернышев |first1=В.И. |url=http://www.ranar.spb.ru/rus/books_8/id/222/ |script-title=ru:А.А. Шахматов (1864–1920): Сборник статей и материалов |trans-title=A.A. Shakhmatov (1864–1920): Collection of Articles and Materials |script-chapter=ru:Ф.Ф. фортунатов и А.А. Шахматов – Реформаторы русского правописания |trans-chapter=F.F. Fortunatov and [[Aleksey Shakhmatov|A.A. Shakhmatov]] — Reformers of Russian Spelling |editor-last=Oborskogo |editor-first=S.P. |location=Moscow |publisher=Academy of Sciences of the USSR |year=1947 |pages=167–252 |access-date=8 January 2017 |archive-date=9 November 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171109182824/http://www.ranar.spb.ru/rus/books_8/id/222 |url-status=dead }}</ref> The decree was nearly identical to the proposals put forth by the May Assembly, and with other minor modifications formed the substance of the decree issued by the [[Soviet of People's Commissars]] in October 1918.<ref name="ComrieEtAl1996" /><ref name="Chernyshev1947" />

Although occasionally praised by the Russian [[working class]], the reform was unpopular amongst the educated people, religious leaders and many prominent writers, many of whom were oppositional to the [[Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|new state]].<ref>{{Cite web|last=Mii|first=Mii|date=December 6, 2019|title=The Russian Spelling Reform of 1917/18 - Part II (Alphabet I)|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8sX6Bald8w|website=YouTube|access-date=27 July 2020|archive-date=13 August 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200813093051/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8sX6Bald8w|url-status=live}}</ref> Furthermore, even the workers ridiculed the spelling reform at first, arguing it made the Russian language poorer and less elegant.<ref>[https://www.kommersant.ru/amp/3507685 Как большевики свергли правила орфографии.]</ref>

In this way, private publications could formally be printed using the old (or more generally, any convenient) orthography. The decree forbade the retraining of people previously trained under the old norm. A given spelling was considered a misspelling only if it violated both the old and the new norms.

[[File:Совет народных комиссаров ДКР 16.02.1918.jpg|thumb|Early Soviet documents frequently conflated pre- and post-reform spelling]]
However, in practice, the Soviet government rapidly set up a [[monopoly]] on print production and kept a very close eye on the fulfillment of the edict. A common practice was the forced removal of not just the letters {{lang|ru-petr1708|[[І]]}}, {{lang|ru-petr1708|[[Ѳ]]}}, and {{lang|ru-petr1708|[[Ѣ]]}} from printing offices, but also {{lang|ru-petr1708|[[Ъ]]}}. Because of this, the usage of the [[apostrophe]] as a dividing sign became widespread in place of {{lang|ru-petr1708|ъ}} (e.g., {{lang|ru-luna1918|под’ём}}, {{lang|ru-luna1918|ад’ютант}} instead of {{lang|ru-petr1708|подъём}}, {{lang|ru-petr1708|адъютант}}), and came to be perceived as a part of the reform (even if, from the point of view of the letter of the decree of the [[Council of People's Commissars]], such uses were mistakes). People resisting the implementation of the new orthography were deemed [[enemies of the people]] and executed. Nonetheless, some academic printings (connected with the publication of old works, documents or printings whose typesettings predated the revolution) came out in the old orthography (except [[title page]]s and, often, [[preface]]s) up until 1929.<ref name="kommersant.ru">{{cite web|url=https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3507685|title=Грамматический террор: Как большевики свергли правила орфографии}}</ref>

===Simplification===
The reform reduced the number of orthographic rules having no support in pronunciation—for example, the difference of the genders in the plural and the need to learn a long list of words which were written with yats (the composition of said list was controversial among linguists, and different spelling guides contradicted one another).

The reform resulted in some economy in writing and [[typesetting]], due to the exclusion of {{lang|ru-petr1708|Ъ}} at the end of words—by the reckoning of [[Lev Uspensky]], text in the new orthography was shorter by one-thirtieth.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Uspensky |first1=Lev V. |author-link=Lev Uspensky |script-title=ru:Слово о словах |trans-title=A Word on Words |location=Moscow |publisher=Ripol Klassik |year=1962 }}</ref>

The reform removed pairs of completely [[homophonous]] [[graphemes]] from the Russian alphabet (i.e., {{lang|ru-petr1708|Ѣ}} and {{lang|ru-luna1918|Е}}; {{lang|ru-petr1708|Ѳ}} and {{lang|ru-petr1708|Ф}}; and the trio of {{lang|ru-petr1708|И}}, {{lang|ru-petr1708|І}} and {{lang|ru-petr1708|Ѵ}}), bringing the alphabet closer to [[Russian phonology|the Russian language's actual phonological system]].<ref name="auto">{{Cite web|url=https://godliteratury.ru/articles/2018/01/15/pishi-propalo-sto-let-reforme-russkoy-o|script-title=ru:Пиши пропало. Сто лет реформе русской орфографии|trans-title=It's gone: One hundred years of Russian spelling reform|script-website=ru:Год Литературы|trans-website=Year of Literature}}</ref>
===Criticism===
[[File:Агитационный плакат армии Колчака.jpg|thumb|left|200px|1919 White Army anti-Bolshevik poster encouraging people to enlist as volunteers. Note the continued use of the pre-reform spelling.]]
According to critics, the choice of ''Ии'' as the only letter to represent that side and the removal of ''Іі'' defeated the purpose of 'simplifying’ the language, as ''Ии'' occupies more space and, furthermore, is sometimes indistinguishable from ''Шш''.<ref name="kommersant.ru"/>

The reform also created many [[homograph]]s and [[homonym]]s, which used to be spelled differently. Examples: есть/ѣсть (to be/eat) and миръ/міръ (peace/the World) became ''есть'' and ''мир'' in both instances.

In a complex system of cases, -аго was replaced with -его (лучшаго → лучшего), in other instances -аго was replaced with -ого, -яго with -его (e.g., новаго → нового, ранняго → раннего), feminine cases moved from -ыя, -ія — to -ые, -ие (новыя (книги, изданія) → новые);
Feminine pronouns онѣ, однѣ, однѣхъ, однѣмъ, однѣми were replaced with они, одни, одних, одним, одними; ея (нея) was replaced with на её (неё).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/otnoshenie-tvorcheskoy-intelligentsii-k-reforme-russkogo-yazyka-1918-goda/viewer|title=Отношение творческой интеллигенции к реформе русского языка 1918 года}}</ref>

The latter was especially controversial, as these feminine pronouns had been deep-rooted in the language and extensively used by writers and poets.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://historyrussia.org/sobytiya/ad-bez-znaka-tverdogo-russkie-satiriki-o-reforme-russkogo-yazyka.html|title=""Адъ" без знака твeрдого". Русские сатирики о реформе русского языка}}</ref>

[[Prefix]]es ending with {{nowrap|''-з/с''}} underwent a change: now all of them (except {{nowrap|''с-''}}) end with {{nowrap|''-с''}} before voiceless consonants and with {{nowrap|''-з''}} before voiced consonants or vowels ({{lang|ru|разбить, разораться}}, but {{lang|ru|расступиться}}). Previously, the prefixes showed concurrence between phonetic (as now) and morphological (always ''з'') spellings; at the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century the standard rule was: ''{{nowrap|с-,}} {{nowrap|без-,}} {{nowrap|ч(е)рез-}}'' were always written in this way; other prefixes ended with ''с'' before voiceless consonants except ''с''  and with ''з'' otherwise ({{lang|ru|разбить, разораться, разступиться}}, but {{lang|ru|распасться}}). Earlier 19th-century works also sometimes used ''з'' before ''ц, ч, ш, щ''.
[[File:Ливадийский дворец 224.jpg|thumb|right|A [[blackboard]] with handwritten pre-revolutionary Russian]]

==See also==
* [[Russian language]]
* [[Russian alphabet]]
* [[Cyrillic script]]
* [[Cyrillic alphabets]]
* ''[[Rules of Russian Orthography and Punctuation]]''
* [[Yoficator]]

==References==
{{reflist}}

==External links==
* [http://www.gramota.ru/ GRAMOTA.ru] A reference and tutorial site on Russian literacy sponsored by the Russian government
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20071201042238/http://www.astro.usu.ru/content/source/chair/doc/pravila56_web/default.htm The full text of the 1956 Russian orthographic codification]
* [http://members.shaw.ca/arsoys/grot-russkoe-pravopisanie.djvu J.K. Grot, ''Russkoe Pravopisanie''] (standard guide to the pre-reform rules), 1894 (DJVU file, pre-1918 orthography)
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20080226182017/http://www.lingvo.com/multilingual/dictinfo.asp?dictId=95257 The Comprehensive Dictionary of the Contemporary Russian Language.] The largest Russian dictionary with orthography
* [http://therules.ru 1956 Russian orthographic codification]
* [http://www.russportal.ru/index.php?id=oldorth.iljin Criticism of the 1918 reform] {{in lang|ru}}
* [http://podolak.net/en/transliteration CyrAcademisator] Bi-directional online transliteration for ALA-LC (diacritics), scientific, ISO/R 9, ISO 9, GOST 7.79B and others. Supports pre-reform characters
* [http://russiasgreatwar.org/media/culture/orthography.shtml The Writing on the Wall: The Russian Orthographic Reform of 1918]
* [http://slavenica.com/ Славеница (Slavenitsa): online converter from post-1918 to pre-1918 Russian]

{{Russian language}}
{{Language orthographies}}
{{Authority control}}

[[Category:Russian orthography| ]]
[[Category:Russian language|Orthography]]