View source for Queen's Pier

{{Short description|Demolished public ceremonial pier in Hong Kong}}
{{Good article}}
{{Use Hong Kong English|date=August 2022}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2022}}
{{Infobox pier
| name          = Queen's Pier
| image         = Queen's Pier at night.jpg
| image_size    = 250px
| alt           = 
| caption       = Queen's Pier at night, 2006
| official_name = 
| carries       = 
| spans         = 
| locale        = [[Edinburgh Place]], [[Central, Hong Kong]]
| maint         = 
| design        = [[Modernism|Modern utilitarianism]]
| construction  = 
| owner         = 
| operator      = 
| mainspan      = 
| length        = 
| width         = 
| clearance     = 
| below         = 
| traffic       = 
| open          = 1925
| renovated     = 1954
| closed        = 2008
| listed        =
| toll          = 
| map_cue       = 
| map_image     = 
| map_text      = 
| map_width     = 
| coordinates   = <!-- {{coord|display=inline,title}} -->
}}
{{Chinese
|t=皇后碼頭
|s=皇后码头
|j=Wong4 hau6 maa5 tau5
|y=Wong4 hau6 ma5 tau4
|p=Huánghòu Mǎtóu
}}

'''Queen's Pier''', named after [[Queen Victoria]], was a public pier in front of [[City Hall, Hong Kong|City Hall]] in [[Edinburgh Place]], [[Central, Hong Kong]]. For three generations it served not only as a public pier in day-to-day use but also as a major ceremonial arrival and departure point.  The pier witnessed the official arrival in Hong Kong of all of [[Governor of Hong Kong|Hong Kong's governors]] since 1925; [[Elizabeth II]] landed there in 1975, as did the [[Prince Charles|Prince]] and [[Diana, Princess of Wales|Princess of Wales]] in 1989.

The second and final pier structure, built along the newly reclaimed waterfront, was designed in a [[Modernism|modern utilitarian]] style and was opened by Maurine Grantham, wife of Governor [[Alexander Grantham]], in June 1954.

On 26 April 2007, the pier was closed by the [[Government of Hong Kong|government]] to enable [[Land reclamation in Hong Kong|land reclamation]], soon after [[Edinburgh Place Ferry Pier|the adjacent Star Ferry pier]] was closed. There was fierce opposition by [[heritage conservation in Hong Kong|conservationists]], who carried over their campaign to preserve the landmark. Police officers evicted some 30 protesters from the site on 1 August 2007; activists filed for a judicial review, and the [[High Court (Hong Kong)|High Court]] hearing began on 7 August. On 10 August, the court dismissed the request.

Finally, the Queen's Pier was completely demolished in February 2008. Its base piles were also removed in March 2008. In 2008, the government's attempts, post dismantling, to create the appearance of public support for reassembling the pier at the new waterfront were criticised by conservationists.<ref name=rubber/>
{{TOC limit}}

==History==
[[Image:Queen's pier.gif|thumb|upright=1.5|Full length of Queen's Pier, c.1930]]

A former wooden pier at the site known as "Queen's Statue Wharf" was replaced in 1925.<ref name=EIA1 /> It was a ceremonial landing area for the [[British royal family]] visiting Hong Kong, and for successive governors to assert their authority on arrival. The first governor to land there was [[Cecil Clementi]], in November 1925. The preceding governor, [[Reginald Stubbs]], boarded the ''Victoria'' from the pier at the end of his term on 31 October 1925.<ref name=EIA1/>

===1925 pier===
[[File:Queen's Pier in 1925.jpg|thumb|upright=1.5|Queen's Pier (right), [[Cecil Clementi|Clementi]]'s inauguration in 1925]]
The 1925 pier was originally named "Statue Pier", but was renamed "Queen's Pier" in honour of Queen Victoria on 31 July 1924.<ref name=EIA1>[http://www.amo.gov.hk/form/AAB_Paper129_queen_annexb_e.pdf "A Historical and Architectural Appraisal of Queen’s Pier, Central (Annexe B3)] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927132425/http://www.amo.gov.hk/form/AAB_Paper129_queen_annexb_e.pdf |date=27 September 2007 }}, Antiquities and Monuments Office, Government of Hong Kong SAR. Retrieved 15 December 2007</ref> It was a sheltered pier made of concrete and steel, with round pillars and arches, built on the site of the present [[Mandarin Oriental, Hong Kong|Mandarin Oriental Hotel]]<ref>Martin Wong, "Ship has sailed for another landmark", ''South China Morning Post'', 18 December 2006, page 1</ref> at a cost of HK$20,000.<ref>"Final stages of Central reclamation, new Queen's Pier gets a cover", 工商日報, 12 February 1954 {{in lang|zh}}</ref> Intended to be opened in time for the arrival of [[Edward VIII of the United Kingdom|Edward]], the [[Prince of Wales]], construction delays postponed its completion until October 1925.<ref name=EIA1/> It was demolished in January 1955.<ref name="Phillips"/>

===1954 pier===
As part of post-[[World War II|war]] reclamation, the old pier was demolished. Work commenced in February 1954 on a new pier on the new waterfront designed in a [[Modernism|modern utilitarian]] style.<ref name=EIA1/> The structure was described as a U-shaped plan, with an open-sided superstructure. It consisted of tiled reinforced concrete base and pillars, and was modelled after previous piers in the area. Its flat roof was also made of concrete, topped with bitumen waterproofing.<ref name=EIA1/> Five sets of stairs allowed boat passengers to board and disembark, three located on the north side, one on the east and one on the west.

The pier was considered "an integral part" of the ceremonial cluster including [[City Hall, Hong Kong|City Hall]] and [[Edinburgh Place]] which was being formed at the time, and the entrance to the City Hall formed an axis with the Pier to lend a sense of occasion to visiting dignitaries. The secondary design goal was to maximise public access to the very limited open space in [[Central, Hong Kong|Central]] in contrast with the city bustle.<ref name="Phillips">Liz Heron, "Save Queen's Pier, says architect of City Hall complex", ''South China Morning Post'', 13 May 2007, page 4</ref>

The pier was opened by Lady Maurine Grantham, wife of Governor Sir [[Alexander Grantham]], on 28 June 1954.<ref>Sara Z Al-Sudairy, [http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=50379&sid=14752469&con_type=1&d_str=20070802&sear_year=2007 Royal landing site valued by public] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110522044750/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=50379&sid=14752469&con_type=1&d_str=20070802&sear_year=2007 |date=22 May 2011 }}, ''The Standard'', 2 August 2007. Retrieved 7 August 2007</ref>

==Function==
The pier's primary role was ceremonial. It was the traditional landing place of successive governors, who would arrive at Central on board the official Governor's Yacht which would dock at Queen's Pier. From the 1960s, governors would inspect a [[guard of honour]] at [[Edinburgh Place]], followed by the swearing-in at City Hall.<ref name=EIA1/>

HM [[Elizabeth II|The Queen]] landed there on 4 May 1975 on her first visit, after arriving by plane at [[Kai Tak International Airport|Kai Tak Airport]].<ref>Raymond Yao, [http://sunzi1.lib.hku.hk/newspaper/view/01_08.01/136293.pdf "The Royal seal of stability"], ''Far Eastern Economic Review'', 16 May 1975. Retrieved 7 August 2007</ref> The [[Charles, Prince of Wales|Prince]] and [[Diana, Princess of Wales|Princess]] of Wales landed there in November 1989.<Ref name=scmp>{{Cite news|title=Queen's Pier belongs in Central and should return there|author=Buddle, Cliff| url=https://www.scmp.com/comment/opinion/article/3116208/queens-pier-belongs-central-and-should-return-there |date=2 January 2021|access-date=3 August 2022 |work=[[South China Morning Post]]}}</ref>

The pier's secondary role was as a public pier, where pleasure craft were allowed to dock.<ref name=scmp/> Tour boats offering a view of the [[Kowloon]] side of the harbour used the pier for passenger boarding. Up to 1978, it was the finishing line for the annual cross-harbour swimming race. As the ceremonies declined, the pier's secondary purpose became the main one: people met and strolled in the area,<ref name=land/> and others fished.

On 26 April 2007, the pier was closed in order to facilitate land reclamation in Central.<ref>[http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/26/news/hong.php "In Hong Kong, no looking back at Britain"], ''International Herald Tribune'', 26 April 2007. Retrieved 8 May 2007</ref>

== Demolition ==
[[Image:Victoria Harbour from City Hall 14-Oct-2005 (1).jpg|thumb|upright=1.5|[[Edinburgh Place Ferry Pier|Old Star Ferry Pier]] (front left) and Queen's Pier (front right) in 2005. The new piers (background left) now in full operation.]]
From the outset, the fate of the pier has been intimately linked with the [[Central and Wan Chai Reclamation|Central Reclamation]] project which was unveiled in 1989 but not explicitly spelled out as such. However, the scale of reclamations has only been slightly cut back following significant legal battles.<Ref name=land>{{Cite book|title=Land and Housing Controversies in Hong Kong: Perspectives of Justice and Social Values| editor=Yung, Betty |editor2=Yu, Kam-Por |year=2020 |publisher=Springer Nature Singapore |location=Singapore |author=Ying, Koon-kau |isbn=9789811552656 |chapter=Heritage Preservation Versus Development: The Case of Queen's Pier |pages=127–144}}</ref>

In conjunction with the proposed demolition of the Queen’s Pier and the adjacent [[Edinburgh Place Ferry Pier]] necessitated by Phase III of the Central Reclamation project, the [[Antiquities and Monuments Office]] (AMO) commissioned a heritage impacts survey in 2001.<ref name=":6">{{Cite web |date=May 2007 |title=Memorandum for Members of the Antiquities Advisory Board on Grading of Queen's Pier, Central, Hong Kong |url=https://www.aab.gov.hk/filemanager/aab/common/129meeting/AAB_Paper129_grading_e.pdf |access-date=9 April 2022}}</ref> The [[Antiquities Advisory Board]] (AAB), in two separate meetings in March 2002 and December 2006, reached the same view of not raising objections as to the demolition of the Queen’s Pier. Instead, the Board asked the Government to preserve relics of the Queen’s Pier for reconstruction on the reclaimed harbourfront.<ref name=":6" />

=== Government's position ===
Following the controversy and the demolition of the [[Edinburgh Place Ferry Pier|Star Ferry Pier in Edinburgh Place]] in early 2007, activists declared Queen's Pier the next battle-ground against the [[Conservation ethic|conservation]] policy of the [[Government of Hong Kong]]. The criticism received over its handling of the Star Ferry Pier caused [[Michael Suen]], the [[Secretary for Housing, Planning and Lands]], to propose a piece-by-piece relocation of the pier to a new location on the reclaimed waterfront during a [[Legislative Council of Hong Kong|Legco]] session on 21 March 2007.<ref name="move">Winnie Chong, [http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=40705&sid=12771187&con_type=1&d_str=20070322&sear_year=2007 "New spot for pier at old location"] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110522040202/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=40705&sid=12771187&con_type=1&d_str=20070322&sear_year=2007 |date=22 May 2011 }}, ''The Standard'', 22 March 2007. Retrieved 7 August 2007</ref> The Government later unveiled four design options for such relocation.<ref name="historic">Diana Lee, [http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=43679&sid=13442728&con_type=1&d_str=20070504&sear_year=2007 "Harbor option for Queen's Pier"] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110522040216/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=43679&sid=13442728&con_type=1&d_str=20070504&sear_year=2007 |date=22 May 2011 }}, ''The Standard'', 4 May 2007. Retrieved 7 August 2007</ref> The intended closure of the pier was 26 April 2007.

At the end of January 2007, the government declared it would postpone the demolition of Queen's Pier until a consensus could be reached on the course of action; consultations with the [[Hong Kong Institute of Architects]], the Hong Kong Institute of Engineers, and the [[Conservancy Association]] were held.<ref name="Anger"/> The Institute of Architects, whose members opposed dismantling the pier, originally maintained the pier should remain untouched. However, it was reported that after meeting the government, the Institute and the Conservancy Association were persuaded by the government that the pier could first be dismantled, and then reassembled at another location after completion of the reclamation. This change of heart was heavily criticised by [[Winston Chu]], founder of the [[Society for Protection of the Harbour]].<ref name="backtrack"/> The HKIA clarified that their opposition had not in fact changed.<ref name=HKIArelease>Press Statement: [http://www.hkia.net/queenspier_2007.php Approval of Funding for Dismantling and Reassembling Queen's Pier by LegCo Public Works Subcommittee at its Meeting held on 23 May 2007] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070929024445/http://www.hkia.net/queenspier_2007.php |date=29 September 2007 }}, Hong Kong Institute of Architects, 7 June 2007. Retrieved 7 August 2007</ref>

[[Chief Executive of Hong Kong|Chief Executive]] [[Donald Tsang]] said that being overzealous in saving the past may hurt Hong Kong's competitiveness, and called on activists to take a more balanced view toward economic growth and conservation. Soon after Tsang's [[2007 Hong Kong Chief Executive election|re-election as Chief Executive]], on 26 March, the Government pressed ahead with plans to dismantle and move the entire pier, piece by piece, enabling the reclamation to go ahead.<ref>[http://www.news.gov.hk/en/category/infrastructureandlogistics/070326/html/070326en06004.htm Pier preservation plan proposed] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070819091633/http://www.news.gov.hk/en/category/infrastructureandlogistics/070326/html/070326en06004.htm |date=19 August 2007 }}, HK Government, 26 March 2007</ref>

The government said that the in-situ preservation, though apparently viable on paper, would risk irreversible damage to the pier. Furthermore, it argued that important underground facilities such as the Airport Railway Extended Overrun Tunnel would be affected, saying a natural curvature of the track was required.<ref name="move"/> "Setting aside the technical difficulties and the huge risk involved in the works, underpinning for the construction of the extended overrun tunnel would cost about HK$500&nbsp;million and take more than two years to complete".<ref name="move"/>

Appearing before a public forum at the pier on 29 July, Secretary for Development [[Carrie Lam (politician)|Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor]] repeated the government's insistence that keeping the pier was not an option. She said she would "not give the people false hope".<ref name="death knell">Una So, [http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=2&art_id=50121&sid=14706405&con_type=3&d_str=20070730&sear_year=2007 "Death knell on pier"] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110522043736/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=2&art_id=50121&sid=14706405&con_type=3&d_str=20070730&sear_year=2007 |date=22 May 2011 }}, ''The Standard'', 30 July 2007. Retrieved 7 August 2007</ref> Although Lam's performance in public debates was praised,<ref name="debate">Scarlett Chiang & Anson Douglas, [http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=50123&sid=14706306&con_type=1&d_str=20070730&sear_year=2007 "Lam scores well in heated debate"] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110522043755/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=50123&sid=14706306&con_type=1&d_str=20070730&sear_year=2007 |date=22 May 2011 }}, ''The Standard'', 30 July 2007. Retrieved 7 August 2007</ref> the Secretary for Development's conflict of interest as the head of the [[Antiquities Advisory Board]] was criticised. Lam said the AAB did not have governmental authority, and that it had not suggested keeping the pier in its totality.<ref name="death knell"/>

====Dismantling and storing====
At the end of July 2007, the Development Bureau issued a paper for the [[Legislative Council of Hong Kong|Legislative Council]]'s lands and works panel. Hoardings were erected by the end of July, and the target date for completing "preservation works" was set as November. It was suggested for the pier's pitched roof to be disassembled into halves and the 34 concrete columns to be cut at roof and deck level. The pieces would be labelled and then lifted by a crane barge and transported to the government's explosives depot in [[Kau Shat Wan]], [[Lantau Island]], where it would be stored under guard.<ref name="cut up">Diana Lee & Scarlett Chiang, [http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=49343&sid=14544237&con_type=3&d_str=20070719&sear_year=2007 Queen's Pier to be cut up and stored at month's end] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110522044249/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=49343&sid=14544237&con_type=3&d_str=20070719&sear_year=2007 |date=22 May 2011 }}, ''The Standard'', 19 July 2007. Retrieved 7 August 2007</ref>

==== District councils ====
The government polled 16 [[District Council of Hong Kong|District Council]]s, fourteen of which voted in support of relocating the pier to the new water-front. However, in July 2008 activists cried foul when eight councils revealed that the preservation of the pier in its existing location was not put forth as one of the options; the vice-chairmen of two councils which voted to support also objected that their decision may have not been an informed one as not all possible options were on the table. The chief town planner said that the omitted proposal "was not an efficient option and would create unnecessary [[construction waste]]".<ref>"Councils not told of third option before vote", Pg C3 ''South China Morning Post'', 15 July 2008</ref>

After it was revealed in August 2008 that the government was behind the 13 concerted District Councils' motions in 2008 supporting the relocation of the pier to the new waterfront, [[Albert Ho]] condemned the government of tampering with [[District Council of Hong Kong|District Council]]s to "create public opinion." Convenor of the Urban Design Alliance doubted the openness of consultation, saying that "the government had engineered its results". Dr Li Pang-kwong, of [[Lingnan University (Hong Kong)|Lingnan University]], said that the problematic framework of the councils has led them to work too closely with government. He said the 'copy and paste' Queen's Pier motions passed by 13 councils to support government decisions was a rubber-stamp, and a clear sign that councils lacked independence.<ref name=rubber>{{Cite news |author=Olga Wong |author2=Joyce Ng |title= 'Rubber stamp' council lashed over pier vote |page=A3 |newspaper=South China Morning Post |date=24 June 2008}}</ref>

=== Conservationists' position ===
Ron Phillips, original designer of the pier, backed preservation, saying that any loss of the City Hall and the adjacent open space would be something "future generations will come to regret".<ref name="Phillips"/> The Hong Kong Institute of Architects denounced the government's insistence that dismantling and reassembling of the pier was the only feasible option, in disregard of the pier's "grade 1" status. The architects concluded that the "technical difficulties were not irresolvable, and the government's reasons for not revising the current infrastructural design were not at all convincing".<ref name=HKIArelease/>

Environmental groups were angered by the government's [[technobabble]], and for inflating the costs and technical difficulties of keeping the pier at the original site.<ref name="Anger">Audrey Parwani, "Anger over plan to dismantle pier", ''South China Morning Post'', 27 March 2007, page B1</ref> The proposed 40-metre-wide road, planned in the 1980s, was now "obsolete", and would make the waterfront "inaccessible to the public<ref name="don't kid">Audrey Parwani, "Don't kid the public on when the pier will be rebuilt, party says", ''South China Morning Post'', 7 June 2007, page C4</ref>". [[Albert Lai]], Chairman of the Hong Kong People's Council for Sustainable Development, drew attention to the fact that the budgeted spending for infrastructure over the past three years of HK$90&nbsp;billion contrasted poorly with HK$90&nbsp;million spent on acquiring and renovating heritage sites.<ref name="Tsang"/>

The [[Civic Party]] accused the government of misleading the public: the development plans for the [[North Island Line]] precluded the restoration of the pier before 2016.<ref name="don't kid"/> [[Christine Loh]] criticised Donald Tsang for failing to grasp the economical, cultural and social importance of heritage.<ref name="Tsang">Jonathan Cheng, [http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=2&art_id=37101&sid=11945933&con_type=1&d_str=20070129&sear_year=2007 "Protect heritage and growth, urges Tsang"] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110522040422/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=2&art_id=37101&sid=11945933&con_type=1&d_str=20070129&sear_year=2007 |date=22 May 2011 }}, ''The Standard'', 29 January 2007. Retrieved 7 August 2007</ref>

Local Action, a loose alliance of protesters on site, described the pier as a cornerstone of Hong Kong identity. By linking the pier with earlier social movements in late 1960s and early 1970s, it argued that the place was a symbol of Hong Kong civic activism and therefore should not be demolished.<ref>{{Cite journal | last=Ku | first=Agnes Shuk-mei |year= 2012 | title=Remaking Places and Fashioning an Opposition Discourse: Struggle over the Star Ferry Pier and the Queen's Pier in Hong Kong | journal=[[Environment and Planning D: Society and Space]] |volume= 30 | pages=16 | doi=10.1068/d16409 | s2cid=54956756 }}</ref>

=== Preservation campaign battlefronts ===

==== Public and media ====
In September 2004, legislator Law Chi-kwong took a swim in Victoria Harbour bearing a plaque saying "Goodbye to the Queen", to protest the [[Central and Wan Chai Reclamation]], particularly the loss of Queen's Pier.<ref>[http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=&art_id=9508&sid=&con_type=1&d_str=20040908&sear_year=2004 "Legislator in protest swim"] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110522041454/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=&art_id=9508&sid=&con_type=1&d_str=20040908&sear_year=2004 |date=22 May 2011 }}, Associated Press, 8 September 2004. Retrieved 7 August 2007</ref>

[[Image:QP protest banners.jpg|thumb|Banners erected by protesters, tents on the rooftop]]
Soon after the unsuccessful attempt to save the Star Ferry pier in early 2007, a campaign to preserve the pier ''in situ'' was launched.<ref>[http://www.com.cuhk.edu.hk/varsity/0703/community1a.htm "Heritage conservation: Youth awaken to local identity, Varsity March 2007"]</ref> Ahead of the closure, members of the public, environmentalists, and some lawmakers arrived to tie blue ribbons to indicate their desire to preserve [[Victoria Harbour|the harbour]]. On 22 April, about 100 protesters once again rallied at the pier, launching farewell voyages in a last-ditch attempt to urge the Government to reconsider:<ref name="backtrack">Una So, [http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=42807&sid=13259364&con_type=1&d_str=20070423&sear_year=2007 "Groups accused of backtracking on Queen's Pier] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110522040403/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=42807&sid=13259364&con_type=1&d_str=20070423&sear_year=2007 |date=22 May 2011 }}, ''The Standard'', 23 April 2007</ref> a petition of over 400 signatures from the Arts community was collected.<ref name="protest">Joshua But, "Protest voyagers sail from pier", ''South China Morning Post'', C4, 23 April 2007</ref>

[[Image:QP Hungerstrike.jpg|thumb|The hunger strikers' encampment, day 3]]
An occupation of the pier was started by ten activists on the designated closure date. The campaign was boosted by the appearance of [[Chow Yun-fat]] early on the morning of 28 April to sign the petition, and to appeal pre-emptively to the police not to hurt protesters.<ref name="yunfat">Chloe Lai, "Chow Yun-fat signs pier petition", ''South China Morning Post'', 29 April 2007, page 3</ref> Some activists, like [[Chu Hoi-dick]], have been involved in the Star Ferry pier protest, and took turns to maintain a round-the-clock presence.<ref name="Last resistance">Chloe Lai, "Heritage: Last resistance", ''South China Morning Post'', 12 June 2007, page A12</ref> Leung Chun-yiu spent three nights a week at the site, despite working a full-time job, vowing to block the demolition non-violently in any way he could.<ref name="Lewis Leung Chun-yiu">Simon Parry, "First Person", ''South China Morning Post'', 7 June 2007, page C2</ref>

On 27 July, three students, as part of a group called ''Local Action'' started a hunger strike at the pier.<ref name="hunger strike">"Pier protesters stage hunger strike", ''South China Morning Post'', 28 July 2007, page 1</ref> Hunger striker Chan King-fai said: "The government wasn't chosen by us. All we can do is to use our humble and limited voices."<ref name="hunger strike"/> The government responded with a communications offensive, announcing that Secretary for Development Carrie Lam would appear on [[RTHK]]'s City's Forum and at a public forum on 29 July at the pier.<ref name="hunger strike"/>

On 30 July, the Government ordered an end to the "unlawful occupation" of government land by midnight. Activists vowed to defy the order; a candlelight vigil held at the pier was attended by 200 sympathisers. The Government did not risk a violent confrontation immediately on the expiry of the eviction deadline.<ref>Damon Pang, [http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=50293&sid=14736283&con_type=1&d_str=20070801&sear_year=2007 "Protesters spend one last night at Queen's Pier"] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110522044432/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=50293&sid=14736283&con_type=1&d_str=20070801&sear_year=2007 |date=22 May 2011 }}, ''The Standard'', 1 August 2007. Retrieved 7 August 2007</ref> In an operation which lasted ten hours during daylight hours on 1 August 2007, 300 Police officers cleared away the 30 or so protesters from the site, amid scuffles.<ref>Damon Pang, [http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=50378&sid=14757869&con_type=3&d_str=20070802&sear_year=2007 "Violent scuffle mars otherwise tidy operation"] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110522044731/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=50378&sid=14757869&con_type=3&d_str=20070802&sear_year=2007 |date=22 May 2011 }}, ''The Standard'', 2 August 2007. Retrieved 7 August 2007</ref> [[Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor]] complained that its observers were denied access to the area during the eviction.<ref>Una So, [http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=50389&sid=14754470&con_type=3&d_str=20070802&sear_year=2007 "Pier vigil comes to dramatic end"] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110522044759/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=50389&sid=14754470&con_type=3&d_str=20070802&sear_year=2007 |date=22 May 2011 }}, ''The Standard'', 2 August 2007. Retrieved 7 August 2007</ref>

==== Legislative Council ====
An application for HK$50&nbsp;million to fund the dismantling and relocating of the pier was scheduled for debate by the Public Works sub-committee on 9 May 2007, the same day the Antiquities Advisory Board would hold a public hearing to decide on the historical grading of the pier.<ref name="Anger"/> Government stressed the timing was "a coincidence",<ref name=antiquities/> and steadfastly refused to defer the vote pending an outcome of the AAB vote.

On 9 May, after an hour-long heated debate, the government was forced to withdraw its motion<ref name=antiquities>Damon Pang, [http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=44107&sid=13530773&con_type=3&d_str=20070510&sear_year=2007 "Antiquities backing to save Queen's Pier"] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110522040138/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=44107&sid=13530773&con_type=3&d_str=20070510&sear_year=2007 |date=22 May 2011 }}, ''The Standard'', 10 May 2007. Retrieved 7 August 2007</ref> due to the lack of support. Choy So-yuk, from the usually pro-Government [[Democratic Alliance for the Betterment of Hong Kong|DAB]], called for the vote to be postponed, and the [[Liberal Party (Hong Kong)|Liberal Party]] equally did not back the Government.<ref name="weak crab">Ambrose Leung, "Pier failure shows Tsang team 'like a weak crab'", ''South China Morning Post'', 11 May 2007, page 1</ref> However, Government ministers declared that it had "no plans to list the pier as a [[declared monuments of Hong Kong|declared monument]]", and insisted that there was "no direct relationship between the grading and whether we will demolish and relocate the pier".<ref name=antiquities/> During the debate, the Director of [[Leisure and Cultural Services Department|Leisure and Cultural Services]] also said that even if the site was pronounced a first-class monument, there remained no legally binding prohibition against its demolition.<ref name=antiquities/> Liberal Party chairman [[James Tien (politician)|James Tien]] said that, in failing to muster support to implement its policies, "the Government is like a crab with weak legs".<ref name="weak crab"/>

The government claimed that its handling of the issue had been "in line with pledges made by Chief Executive Donald Tsang Yam-kuen during his recent re-election campaign" to regain the moral high ground regarding heritage preservation, following the mistakes of the Star Ferry saga.<ref>Carrie Chan, [http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=44119&sid=13534026&con_type=1&d_str=20070510&sear_year=2007 "New policy aims will lead heritage debate"] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110522040113/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=44119&sid=13534026&con_type=1&d_str=20070510&sear_year=2007 |date=22 May 2011 }}, ''The Standard'', 10 May 2007. Retrieved 7 August 2007</ref> Civic Party legislative councillor [[Fernando Cheung]] Chiu-hung said that there was "no sincerity [from the government] to preserve historic venues".<ref name=antiquities/>

The public works subcommittee approved the Government's re-submitted request for funds to dismantle and relocate Queen's Pier on 23 May in a 10–7 vote.<ref name=nod>Diana Lee, [http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=45173&sid=13752998&con_type=1&d_str=20070524&sear_year=2007 "Pier demolition cash bid gets nod"] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110522041329/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=45173&sid=13752998&con_type=1&d_str=20070524&sear_year=2007 |date=22 May 2011 }}, 24 May 2007. Retrieved 7 August 2007</ref> Choy So-yuk, who voted against the appropriation on 9 May, abstained. She revealed that she had been lobbied by Michael Suen and Donald Tsang; party [[Whip (politics)|whips]] did not allow her to cast an opposing vote.<ref name=nod/> The Hong Kong Institute of Architects said it "regretted the funding approval".<ref name=HKIArelease/>

==== Antiquities Advisory Board grading vote ====
On 6 March 2007, the AAB agreed on a review of the Pier’s grading and commissioned the AMO to conduct a study on the historic and heritage value of the Pier.<ref name=":6" /> Subsequently the Board convened an open meeting on 9 May 2007, in which the Board adopted the AMO’s report. The AAB by simple majority recommended the Pier to be graded as a grade I historic building on the grounds of historical significance and social value.<ref>Antiquities Advisory Board. (2007). Minutes of the Antiquities Advisory Board 129th Meeting. Retrieved 9 April 2022, from https://www.aab.gov.hk/en/meetings/open-meetings/index_id_9.html?type=minutes&year=2007.</ref><ref>The Standard. (10 May 2007). Antiquities backing to save Queen’s Pier. Retrieved 10 April 2022, from https://web.archive.org/web/20110522040138/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=44107&sid=13530773&con_type=3&d_str=20070510&sear_year=2007.</ref> Twelve members voted for Grade 1 listing, and ten voted for Grade 2 listing. However, the status is not-binding on the Government.<ref name=autogenerated1>"Historic status for pier, but future still in doubt", Chloe Lai, ''South China Morning Post'', 10 May 2007, page 1</ref>

After the hearing, an activist from 'Local Action' declared the AAB's decision a victory for the people, and warned the government "not to treat the voice of the people lightly".<ref name=antiquities/> In spite of conservationist campaigns and the AAB’s grading recommendation, then-[[Secretary for Housing, Planning and Lands]] [[Michael Suen]] stated that the Pier must be removed from site before relocation;<ref>星島日報 [Sing Tao Daily]. (10 May 2007). 孫公企硬 「皇后」一定搬 [Michael Suen stands firm on the relocation of the Queen’s Pier]. Retrieved 9 April 2022, from https://web.archive.org/web/20070718020838/http://hk.news.yahoo.com/070509/60/273s7.html.</ref> Suen further stated that the AAB’s recommendation had no bearing on the Government’s action.<ref>明報 [Mingpao]. (9 May 2007). 孫公表明難原址保留碼頭 [Michael Suen stresses difficulties in preserving the Queen’s Pier at its current site]. Retrieved 9 April 2022, from https://web.archive.org/web/20070915145657/http://hk.news.yahoo.com/070509/12/273a8.html.</ref>

==== Legal challenge ====
As Lands Department officials arrived on 30 July to put up notices ordering an end to the "unlawful occupation" of government land, the activists filed for a judicial review,<ref>Damon Pang, [http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=50212&sid=14718283&con_type=3&d_str=20070731&sear_year=2007 "Court challenge as tussle looms on pier"] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110522044318/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=50212&sid=14718283&con_type=3&d_str=20070731&sear_year=2007 |date=22 May 2011 }}, ''The Standard'', 31 July 2007. Retrieved 7 August 2007</ref> claiming that the decision of the [[Secretary for Home Affairs]] not to declare the structure a monument was unreasonable and illegal.<ref name="Straits Times">[http://www.straitstimes.com/Asia/China/Story/STIStory_144415.html "Hong Kong court delays demolition of historic Queen's Pier"], ''[[The Straits Times]]'', 1 August 2007. Retrieved 7 August 2007</ref> The [[High Court (Hong Kong)|High Court]] set the date for the case to be heard as 7 August.<ref>Una So, [http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=50292&sid=14734247&con_type=1&d_str=20070801&sear_year=2007 Pier drama extended as court bid offers delay] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110522044425/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=50292&sid=14734247&con_type=1&d_str=20070801&sear_year=2007 |date=22 May 2011 }}, ''The Standard'', 1 August 2007. Retrieved 7 August 2007</ref> Judge Johnson Lam said that the case about the future of Queen's Pier should be heard as there is great public interest in the outcome and justified a one-week respite for the site.<ref name="Straits Times"/>

On 10 August, the High Court dismissed the request for judicial review, thus giving the go-ahead for the government to demolish it. The judge ruled that the applicants had failed to establish that the government had acted perversely.<ref>Una So, [http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=51043&sid=14893111&con_type=1&d_str=20070811&sear_year=2007 "Court ruling clears way for Queen's Pier dismantling"] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080305024414/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=51043&sid=14893111&con_type=1&d_str=20070811&sear_year=2007 |date=5 March 2008 }}, ''The Standard'', 11 August 2007. Retrieved 7 August 2007</ref>

==== Institute of Planners controversy ====
The [[Hong Kong Institute of Planners]], the majority of whose members work in government departments, had backed the ''in-situ'' preservation of the pier. There was uproar in May 2008 when it made an apparent U-turn in a position paper submitted to the government backing the relocation to a waterfront location, based on a sparsely attended meeting. It then submitted a revised paper presenting that a majority of its members supported such a move as a conclusion prior to the completion of a survey. A former vice-president of the institute questioned how the institute had become allies of the government.<ref>"Planners cry foul over Queen's Pier survey", Pg A1 ''South China Morning Post'', 2 July 2008</ref>

=== Possibility of reinstatement ===
In 2021, it was revealed that the government was looking at a reinstatement of the pier away from the Central Harbourfront area.<ref>[https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/3116139/hong-kongs-queens-pier-may-be-resurrected-away-original Hong Kong’s Queen’s Pier may be resurrected away from original Central area], SCMP, 1 January 2021</ref>

==Popular culture==
The pier is featured in the following programmes and videos:
* ''[[My Date with a Vampire]]'' ([[Asia Television|ATV]])
* ''[[Life Made Simple]]'' ([[Television Broadcasts Limited|TVB]])
* ''[[Glittering Days (TV series)|Glittering Days]]'' (TVB)
* the music video of "Goodbye Bell", a song by [[Sam Hui]]
* in the 2010 movie ''[[Dream Home]]'' set in Hong Kong in the year 2007.
* in the 1988 television miniseries ''[[Noble House (miniseries)|Noble House]]'' starring Pierce Brosnan.

==See also==
{{Commons category|Queen's Pier}}
* [[List of demolished piers in Hong Kong]]
* [[Central Market, Hong Kong|Central Market]]
* [[Central Police Station, Hong Kong|Central Police Station]]
* [[Heritage conservation in Hong Kong]]
* [[Lee Tung Street]]
* [[List of Grade I historic buildings in Hong Kong]]
* [[Yau Ma Tei Police Station]]

==References==
{{Reflist|30em}}

{{Central, Hong Kong}}
{{Heritage conservation in Hong Kong}}

{{Coord|22|16|59.2|N|114|9|42|E|display=title}}

[[Category:1925 establishments in Hong Kong]]
[[Category:1954 establishments in Hong Kong]]
[[Category:2007 disestablishments in Hong Kong]]
[[Category:Buildings and structures demolished in 2008]]
[[Category:Transport infrastructure completed in 1925]]
[[Category:Demolished piers in Hong Kong]]
[[Category:Grade I historic buildings in Hong Kong]]
[[Category:History of Hong Kong]]
[[Category:Central, Hong Kong]]