View source for Judas Iscariot

{{Short description|Disciple and betrayer of Jesus}}
{{hatnote group|{{Distinguish|Jude the Apostle}}
{{Redirect-multi|2|Judas|Iscariot}}}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2025}}

{{external links|date=July 2025}}

{{Infobox religious biography
| name        = Judas Iscariot
| image       = Almeida Júnior - Remorso de Judas, 1880.jpg
| caption     = ''Judas's Remorse'' (1880) by [[Almeida Júnior]]
| birth_date  = AD 3
| birth_place = [[Kerioth]], [[Judaea (Roman province)|Judaea]], Roman Empire
| death_date  = AD 30 to 33
| death_place = [[Jerusalem]], Judea, Roman Empire
| known_for   = Betraying Jesus
| death_cause = [[Suicide by hanging]] and/or [[falling (accident)|fall]]
| parents     = Simon Iscariot (father)
| religion    = 
}}
'''Judas Iscariot''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|dʒ|uː|d|ə|s|_|ɪ|ˈ|s|k|æ|r|i|ə|t}}; {{langx|grc-x-biblical|Ἰούδας Ἰσκαριώτης|translit=Ioúdas Iskariṓtēs}}; {{circa|3}} AD – {{circa|30 to 33}} AD) was, according to [[Christianity]]'s four canonical [[gospel]]s, one of the original [[Twelve Apostles]] of [[Jesus Christ]]. Judas betrayed Jesus to the [[Sanhedrin]] in the [[Garden of Gethsemane]], in exchange for [[thirty pieces of silver]], by [[kiss of Judas|kissing him on the cheek]] and addressing him as "[[names and titles of Jesus in the New Testament#Master|master]]" to reveal his identity in the darkness to the crowd who had come to arrest him.<ref>{{Bibleverse||Matthew|26:14|16}}, {{Bibleverse||Matthew|26:47|56}}, {{Bibleverse||Mark|14:10|11}}, {{Bibleverse||Mark|14:42|52}}, {{Bibleverse||Luke|22:1|5}}, {{Bibleverse||Luke|22:47|53}}, {{Bibleverse||John|13:18|30}}, {{Bibleverse||John|18:1|11}}</ref> In modern times, his name is often used synonymously with [[betrayal]] or [[treason]].

The [[Gospel of Mark]] gives no motive for Judas's betrayal but does present [[Jesus predicts his betrayal|Jesus's predicting<!--[[gerund]]--> it]] at the [[Last Supper]], an event also described in all the other gospels. The [[Gospel of Matthew]] {{bibleverse-nb||Matthew|26:15|9}} states that Judas committed the betrayal in exchange for thirty pieces of silver. The [[Gospel of Luke]] {{bibleverse-nb||Luke|22:3|9}} and the [[Gospel of John]] {{bibleverse-nb||John|13:2|9}} and {{bibleverse-nb||John|13:27|9}} suggest that he was [[Spirit possession|possessed]] by [[Satan]]. According to {{bibleverse||Matthew|27:1–10|9}}, after learning that Jesus [[Crucifixion of Jesus|was to be crucified]], Judas attempted to return the money he had been paid for his betrayal to the chief priests and hanged himself.<ref>{{Citation |title=Matthew |url=https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Bible_(King_James)/Matthew#27:1 |work=The King James Bible |access-date=15 June 2023}}</ref> The priests used the money to buy a field to bury strangers in, which was called the "[[Akeldama|Field of Blood]]" because it had been bought with blood money. [[Acts of the Apostles]] {{bibleverse-nb||Acts|1:18|9}} quotes [[Saint Peter|Peter]] as saying that Judas used the money to buy the field himself, and he "[fell] headlong{{nbs}}... burst asunder in the midst, and all his bowels gushed out." His place among the Twelve Apostles was later filled by [[Saint Matthias|Matthias]].

The [[Gnostic]] [[Gospel of Judas]] portrays Judas's actions as done in obedience to instructions given to him by Jesus, and that Judas understood the [[Old Testament]] God (the [[Demiurge]]) as distinguishable from the true, unknowable God of the [[New Testament]], the [[Monad (Gnosticism)|Monad]] or the One. Jesus transcends the domain of the demiurge, revealing deeper truths to Judas. This opens both Jesus and Judas to disclose a broader understanding of the [[Pleroma]], which has inspired artists, writers, and thinkers. The Gospel was denounced as heresy in 180 AD by [[Irenaeus]].

Due to his notorious role in all the gospel narratives, Judas remains a controversial figure in Christian history. His betrayal is seen as setting in motion the events that led to Jesus's crucifixion and [[Resurrection of Jesus|resurrection]], which, according to traditional [[Christian theology]] brought [[Salvation in Christianity|salvation]] to humanity. Since the Middle Ages, Judas has sometimes been portrayed as a personification of the Jewish people, and his betrayal has been used to justify [[antisemitism in Christianity|Christian antisemitism]].<ref>{{cite web |last1=Gibson |first1=David |title=Anti-Semitism's Muse; Without Judas, History Might Have Hijacked Another Villain |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/09/weekinreview/the-world-antisemitisms-muse-without-judas-history-might-have.html |website=[[The New York Times]] |date=9 April 2006}}</ref>

==Historicity==
Although Judas Iscariot's historical existence is generally widely accepted among secular historians,{{sfn|Ehrman|1999|pages=216–17}}{{sfn|Gubar|2009|pages=31–33}}<ref name="Stein">{{cite book |first=Robert H. |last=Stein |chapter=Criteria for the Gospels' Authenticity |editor1=Paul Copan |editor2=William Lane Craig |title=Contending with Christianity's Critics: Answering New Atheists & Other Objectors |publisher=B&H Publishing Group |location=Nashville, Tennessee |date=2009 |isbn=978-0805449365 |page=93}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |first=John P. |last=Meier |chapter=Criteria: How Do We Decide What Comes from Jesus? |editor1-first=James D.G. |editor1-last=Dunn |editor2-first=Scot |editor2-last=McKnight |title=The Historical Jesus in Recent Research |url=https://archive.org/details/historicaljesusr00dunn |url-access=limited |publisher=[[Eisenbrauns]] |location=Warsaw, Indiana |date=2005 |isbn=978-1575061009 |pages=[https://archive.org/details/historicaljesusr00dunn/page/n143 127]–28}}</ref> this relative consensus has not gone entirely unchallenged.{{sfn|Gubar|2009|pages=31–33}} The earliest possible allusion to Judas comes from the [[First Epistle to the Corinthians]] {{bibleverse-nb||1 Corinthians|11:23–24|9}}, in which [[Paul the Apostle]] does not mention Judas by name{{sfn|Gubar|2009|page=29}}{{sfn|Stanford|2015|page=}} but uses the passive voice of the Greek word ''paradídōmi'' (παραδίδωμι), which most Bible translations render as "was betrayed":{{sfn|Gubar|2009|page=29}}{{sfn|Stanford|2015|page=}} "...{{nbs}}the Lord Jesus on the night when he ''was betrayed'' took a loaf of bread{{nbs}}..."{{sfn|Gubar|2009|page=29}} Nonetheless, some biblical scholars argue that the word ''paradídōmi'' should be translated as "was handed over".{{sfn|Gubar|2009|page=29}}{{sfn|Stanford|2015|page=}} This translation could still refer to Judas,{{sfn|Gubar|2009|page=29}}{{sfn|Stanford|2015|page=}} but it could also instead refer to God metaphorically "handing Jesus over" to the Romans.{{sfn|Gubar|2009|page=29}}

In his book ''Antisemitism and Modernity'' (2006), the Jewish scholar [[Hyam Maccoby]] suggests that, in the [[New Testament]], the name "Judas" was constructed as an attack on the Judaeans or on the Judaean religious establishment held responsible for executing Jesus.<ref>{{cite book |first=Hyam |last=Maccoby |title=Antisemitism and Modernity |url=https://archive.org/details/antisemitismmode00macc |url-access=limited |publisher=[[Routledge]] |location=London, England |date=2006 |isbn=978-0415553889 |page=[https://archive.org/details/antisemitismmode00macc/page/n28 14]}}</ref>{{sfn|Gubar|2009|page=27}} In his book ''The Sins of Scripture'' (2009), [[John Shelby Spong]] concurs with this argument,<ref name="Spong">{{cite book |first=John Shelby |last=Spong |title=The Sins of Scripture |publisher=[[HarperCollins]] |location=New York City |date=2009 |isbn=978-0060778408 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/sinsofscripture00john}}</ref>{{sfn|Gubar|2009|pages=27–28}} insisting, "The whole story of Judas has the feeling of being contrived{{nbs}}... The act of betrayal by a member of the twelve disciples is not found in the earliest Christian writings. Judas is first placed into the Christian story by the [[Gospel of Mark]] ({{bibleverse-nb||Mark|3:19|9}}), who wrote in the early 70s AD."<ref name="Spong"/>

Most scholars reject these arguments for non-historicity,<ref name="Stein"/><ref name="Oropeza">{{cite journal |first=B.J. |last=Oropeza |title=Judas's Death and Final Destiny in the Gospels and Earliest Christian Writings |journal=Neotestamentica |issue=2 |date=2010 |volume=44 |pages=342–61}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |first=B.J. |last=Oropeza |author-link=B. J. Oropeza |title=In the Footsteps of Judas and Other Defectors: Apostasy in the New Testament Communities Volume 1:The Gospels, Acts, and Johannine Letters |publisher=Cascade/[[Wipf & Stock]] |location=Eugene, Oregon |date=2011 |pages=149–50, 230}}</ref>{{sfn|Gubar|2009|page=28}} noting that there is nothing in the gospels to associate Judas with Judeans except his name, which was an extremely common one for Jewish men during the first century,<ref name="Oropeza"/>{{sfn|Gubar|2009|page=31}}{{sfn|Stanford|2015|page=}} and that numerous other figures named "Judas" are mentioned throughout the New Testament, none of whom are portrayed negatively.<ref name="Oropeza"/>{{sfn|Gubar|2009|page=31}}{{sfn|Stanford|2015|page=}} Positive figures named Judas mentioned in the New Testament include the prophet [[Judas Barsabbas]] (Acts 15:22–33), [[Brothers of Jesus|Jesus's brother]] [[Jude, brother of Jesus|Jude]] (Mark 6:3; Matt 13:55; Jude 1), and the apostle [[Jude the Apostle|Judas the son of James]] (Luke 6:14–16; Acts 1:13; John 14:22).<ref name="Oropeza"/>

==Life==
===Name and background===
[[File:Brooklyn Museum - Judas Iscariot (Judas Iscariote) - James Tissot (cropped).jpg|thumb|''Judas Iscariot'' (between 1886 and 1894) by [[James Tissot]]]]
The name "Judas" ({{lang|grc|Ὶούδας}}) is a [[Koine Greek|Greek]] rendering of the Hebrew name [[Judah (given name)|Judah]] ({{lang|he|יהודה}}, {{transliteration|he|Y<sup>e</sup>hûdâh}}, Hebrew for "praise" or "praised"), which was an extremely common name for Jewish men during the first century AD, due to the renowned hero [[Judas Maccabeus]].{{sfn|Gubar|2009|page=31}}{{sfn|Stanford|2015|page=}} Consequently, numerous other figures with this name are mentioned throughout the New Testament.<ref name="Oropeza"/>{{sfn|Gubar|2009|page=31}}{{sfn|Stanford|2015|page=}} In the Gospel of Mark {{bibleverse-nb||Mark|3:13–19|9}}, which was written in the mid-60s or early 70s AD, Judas Iscariot is the only apostle named "Judas".{{sfn|Stanford|2015|page=}} {{bibleverse||Matthew|10:2–4|9}} shares this portrayal.{{sfn|Stanford|2015|page=}} The [[Gospel of Luke]] {{bibleverse-nb||Luke|6:12–19|9}}, however, replaces the apostle whom Mark and Matthew call "[[Jude the Apostle|Thaddeus]]" with "Judas son of James".{{sfn|Stanford|2015|page=}} [[Peter Stanford]] suggests that this renaming may represent an effort by the author of the Gospel of Luke to create a "good Judas" in contrast to the betrayer Judas Iscariot.{{sfn|Stanford|2015|page=}}

Judas's [[epithet]] "Iscariot" ({{lang|grc|Ὶσκάριωθ}} or {{lang|grc|Ὶσκαριώτης}}), which distinguishes him from the other people named "Judas" in the gospels, is usually thought to be a Greek rendering of the [[Hebrew language|Hebrew]] phrase {{lang|he|איש־קריות}}, ({{transliteration|he|Îš-Qrîyôt}}), meaning "the man from [[Kerioth]]".{{sfn|Gubar|2009|page=31}}{{sfn|Stanford|2015|page=}}<ref>{{cite book |first=Richard |last=Bauckham |title=Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony |publisher=[[William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company]] |location=Grand Rapids, Michigan |date=2006 |isbn=978-0802874313 |page=106}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/9033-judas-iscariot|title=JUDAS ISCARIOT – JewishEncyclopedia.com|website=www.jewishencyclopedia.com}}</ref> This interpretation is supported by the statement in the [[Gospel of John]] {{bibleverse-nb||John|6:71|9}} that Judas was "the son of Simon Iscariot".{{sfn|Stanford|2015|page=}} Nonetheless, this interpretation of the name is not fully accepted by all scholars.{{sfn|Gubar|2009|page=31}}{{sfn|Stanford|2015|page=}} One of the most popular alternative explanations holds that "Iscariot" ({{lang|arc|ܣܟܪܝܘܛܐ}}, {{transliteration|arc|'Skaryota'}} in Syriac Aramaic, per the [[Peshitta]] text) may be a corruption of the Latin word {{lang|la|sicarius}}, meaning "dagger man",{{sfn|Gubar|2009|page=31}}{{sfn|Stanford|2015|page=}}<ref>{{cite book |first=Bastiaan |last=van Iersel |title=Mark: A Reader-Response Commentary |publisher=Continuum International |location=Danbury, Connecticut |date=1998 |isbn=978-1850758297 |page=167}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |first=Andrew Gabriel-Yizkhak |last=Roth bar Raphael |title=Aramaic English New Testament |publisher=Netzari Press |edition=5 |isbn=978-1934916421}}; Sedro-Woolley, Wash.: Netzari Press, 2012), 278fn177.</ref> which referred to a member of the [[Sicarii]] ({{lang|arc|סיקריים}} in Aramaic), a group of Jewish rebels who were known for assassinating people in crowds using long knives hidden under their cloaks.{{sfn|Gubar|2009|page=31}}{{sfn|Stanford|2015|page=}} This interpretation is problematic, however, because there is nothing in the gospels to associate Judas with the Sicarii,{{sfn|Stanford|2015|page=}} and there is no evidence that the cadre existed during the 30s AD when Judas was alive.<ref>Brown, Raymond E. (1994). ''The Death of the Messiah: From Gethsemane to the Grave: A Commentary on the Passion Narratives in the Four Gospels v.1 ''pp. 688–92. New York: Doubleday/The Anchor Bible Reference Library. {{ISBN|0-385-49448-3}}; Meier, John P. ''[[A Marginal Jew: Rethinking the Historical Jesus]]'' (2001). v. 3, p. 210. New York: Doubleday/The Anchor Bible Reference Library. {{ISBN|0-385-46993-4}}.</ref>{{sfn|Stanford|2015|page=}}

A possibility advanced by [[Ernst Wilhelm Hengstenberg]] is that "Iscariot" means "the liar" or "the false one", from the Hebrew {{lang|he|איש-שקרים}}. [[C. C. Torrey]] suggests instead the [[Aramaic]] form {{lang|arc|שְׁקַרְיָא}} or {{lang|arc|אִשְׁקַרְיָא}}, with the same meaning.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Torrey |first=Charles C. |date=1943 |title=The Name "Iscariot" |journal=The Harvard Theological Review |volume=36 |issue=1 |pages=51–62 |doi=10.1017/S0017816000029084 |jstor=1507970 |s2cid=162707224 |issn=0017-8160}}</ref><ref name="Iskarioth">{{cite journal |first=Joan E. |last=Taylor |title=The name 'Iskarioth' (Iscariot) |journal=[[Journal of Biblical Literature]] |volume=129 |number=2 |pages=367–83 |doi=10.2307/27821024 |jstor=27821024 |year=2010}}</ref> Stanford rejects this, arguing that the gospel writers follow Judas's name with the statement that he betrayed Jesus, so it would be redundant for them to call him "the false one" before immediately stating that he was a traitor.{{sfn|Stanford|2015|page=}} Some have proposed that the word derives from an Aramaic word meaning "red color", from the root {{lang|arc|סקר}}.<ref>{{cite web |first=Katie |last=Edwards |url=http://theconversation.com/why-judas-was-actually-more-of-a-saint-than-a-sinner-56689 |title=Why Judas was actually more of a saint, than a sinner |magazine=[[The Conversation (website)|The Conversation]] |publisher=The Conversation Trust |location=Melbourne, Australia |date=23 March 2016 |access-date=28 July 2018}}</ref> Another hypothesis holds that the word derives from one of the Aramaic roots {{lang|arc|סכר}} or {{lang|arc|סגר}}. This would mean "to deliver", based on the [[Septuagint]] rendering of Isaiah 19:4 (a theory advanced by J. Alfred Morin).<ref name="Iskarioth"/> The epithet could also be associated with the manner of Judas's death, hanging. This would mean Iscariot derives from a kind of Greek-Aramaic hybrid: {{lang|arc|אִסְכַּרְיוּתָא}}, {{transliteration|arc|Iskarioutha}}, meaning "chokiness" or "constriction". This might indicate that the epithet was applied posthumously by the remaining disciples, but Joan E. Taylor has argued that it was a descriptive name given to Judas by Jesus, since other disciples such as [[Saint Peter|Simon Peter]]/Cephas (''Kephas'' "rock") were also given such names.<ref name="Iskarioth"/>

===Role as an apostle===
[[File:Ghirlandaio, Domenico - Calling of the Apostles - 1481.jpg|thumb|upright=1.7|''Calling of the Apostles'' (1481) by [[Domenico Ghirlandaio]]]]
Although the canonical gospels frequently disagree on the names of some of the minor apostles,{{sfn|Gubar|2009|page=30}} all four of them list Judas Iscariot as one of them.{{sfn|Gubar|2009|page=30}}{{sfn|Stanford|2015|page=}} The [[Synoptic Gospels]] state that Jesus sent out "the twelve" (including Judas) with power over unclean spirits and with a ministry of preaching and healing: Judas clearly played an active part in this apostolic ministry alongside the other eleven.<ref>See Mark 6:6; Matthew 10:5–10; and Luke 9:1</ref> However, in the Gospel of John, Judas's outlook was differentiated{{snd}}many of Jesus's disciples abandoned him because of the difficulty of accepting his teachings, and Jesus asked the twelve if they would also leave him. Simon Peter spoke for the twelve: "Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life," but Jesus observed then that although he himself had chosen the twelve, one of them (unnamed by Jesus, but identified by the narrator) was "a devil" who would betray him.<ref>John 6:67–71</ref>

One of the best-attested and most reliable statements made by Jesus in the gospels comes from the [[Gospel of Matthew]] {{bibleverse-nb||Matthew|19:28|9}}, in which Jesus tells his apostles: "in [[Kingdom of God|the new world]], when the [[Son of Man]] shall sit on his glorious throne, you will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the [[Twelve Tribes of Israel]]."{{sfn|Gubar|2009|page=30}} New Testament scholar [[Bart D. Ehrman]] concludes, "This is not a tradition that was likely to have been made up by a Christian later, after Jesus's death{{snd}}since one of these twelve had abandoned his cause and betrayed him. No one thought that ''Judas Iscariot'' would be seated on a glorious throne in the Kingdom of God. That saying, therefore appears to go back to Jesus, and indicates, then, that he had twelve close disciples, whom he predicted would reign in the coming Kingdom."{{sfn|Gubar|2009|page=30}}
[[File:6852 les deniers de judas.JPG|thumb|upright|left|A sixteenth-century fresco depicting Judas being paid]]
Matthew directly states that Judas betrayed Jesus for a bribe of "[[thirty pieces of silver]]"<ref>These "pieces of silver" were most likely intended to be understood as silver [[Shekel of Tyre|Tyrian shekels]].</ref><ref>{{bibleverse||Matthew|26:14|131}}</ref> by identifying him with a kiss ("the [[kiss of Judas]]") to arresting soldiers of the High Priest [[Caiaphas]], who then turned Jesus over to [[Pontius Pilate]]'s soldiers. Mark's Gospel states that the chief priests were looking for a way to [[Arrest of Jesus|arrest Jesus]]. They decided not to do so during the feast [of the [[Passover]]], since they were afraid that people would riot;<ref>Mark 14:1–2</ref> instead, they chose the night before the feast to arrest him. According to Luke's account, [[demonic possession|Satan entered]] Judas at this time.<ref name="Luke">
{{cite web|url=http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%2022:3&version=31|title=BibleGateway.com – Passage Lookup: Luke 22:3|publisher=[[BibleGateway]]|access-date=21 June 2008|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090115192359/http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%2022:3&version=31|archive-date=15 January 2009}}</ref>

According to the account in the Gospel of John, Judas carried the disciples' money bag or box ({{lang|grc|γλωσσόκομον}}, {{transliteration|grc|glōssokomon}}),<ref>{{bibleverse||John|12:6|131}}and{{bibleverse||John|13:29|131}}</ref> but the Gospel of John makes no mention of the thirty pieces of silver as a fee for betrayal. The [[John the Evangelist|evangelist]] comments in John 12:5–6 that Judas spoke fine words about giving money to the poor, but the reality was "not that he cared for the poor, but [that] he was a thief, and had the money box; and he used to take what was put in it." However, in John 13:27–30, when Judas left the gathering of Jesus and his disciples with betrayal in mind,<ref>John 13:2, [[Jerusalem Bible]] translation</ref> some [of the disciples] thought that Judas might have been leaving to buy supplies or on a charitable errand.
[[File:Giotto - Scrovegni - -31- - Kiss of Judas.jpg|thumb|''The Kiss of Judas'' by [[Giotto di Bondone]] (between 1304 and 1306) depicts Judas's identifying kiss in the [[Gethsemane|Garden of Gethsemane]]]]
Ehrman argues that Judas's betrayal "is about as historically certain as anything else in the tradition",{{sfn|Ehrman|1999|pages=216–17}}{{sfn|Gubar|2009|page=31}} pointing out that the betrayal is independently attested in the Gospel of Mark, in the Gospel of John, and in the Book of Acts.{{sfn|Ehrman|1999|pages=216–17}}{{sfn|Gubar|2009|page=31}} Ehrman also contends that it is highly unlikely that early Christians would have made up the story of Judas's betrayal, since it reflects poorly on Jesus's judgment in choosing him as an apostle.{{sfn|Ehrman|1999|pages=216–17}}{{sfn|Gubar|2009|pages=31–32}} Nonetheless, Ehrman argues that what Judas actually told the authorities was not Jesus's location, but rather Jesus's secret teaching that he was the Messiah.{{sfn|Ehrman|1999|pages=216–17}} This, he holds, explains why the authorities did not try to arrest Jesus prior to Judas's betrayal.{{sfn|Ehrman|1999|pages=216–17}} [[John P. Meier]] sums up the historical consensus, stating, "We only know two basic facts about [Judas]: (1) Jesus chose him as one of the Twelve, and (2) he handed over Jesus to the Jerusalem authorities, thus precipitating Jesus's execution."{{sfn|Gubar|2009|page=33}}

===Death===
[[File:Judas Iscariot from Tarzhishte Monastery.jpg|thumb|A sixteenth-century fresco from Tarzhishte Monastery, Strupets, Bulgaria, showing Judas hanging himself as described in {{bibleverse||Matthew|27:1–10|9}}]]
Many different accounts of Judas's death have survived from antiquity, both within and outside the New Testament.{{sfn|Ehrman|2016|pages=28–29}}{{sfn|Zwiep|2004|pages=16–17}} {{bibleverse||Matthew|27:1–10|9}} states that after learning that Jesus [[crucifixion of Jesus|was to be crucified]], Judas was overcome by remorse and attempted to return the 30 pieces of silver to the priests, but they would not accept them because they were blood money, so he threw them on the ground and left. Afterwards, he committed suicide by hanging himself{{sfn|Zwiep|2004|page=16}} in accordance with Mosaic law ({{bibleverse||Deuteronomy|21:22–23}}).<ref name="Smith2016">{{cite book |first=Barry D. |last=Smith |title=The Meaning of Jesus's Death: Reviewing the New Testament's Interpretations |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ww8eDQAAQBAJ |publisher=[[T&T Clark]] |year=2010 |isbn=978-0567670694 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=Ww8eDQAAQBAJ 93]}}</ref> The priests then used the money to buy a [[potter's field]], which became known as [[Akeldama]] (חקל דמא – ''khakel dama'', the Field of Blood) because it had been bought with blood money.{{sfn|Zwiep|2004|page=16}} {{bibleverse||Acts|1:18|9}} states that Judas used the money to buy a field,{{sfn|Zwiep|2004|page=16}}<ref name="Ehrman2008">{{cite book |first=Bart D. |last=Ehrman |title=The Lost Gospel of Judas Iscariot: A New Look at Betrayer and Betrayed |url=https://archive.org/details/lostgospelofjuda00ehrm |url-access=registration |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |location=Oxfordshire, England |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-19-534351-9 |page=[https://archive.org/details/lostgospelofjuda00ehrm/page/147 147]}}</ref> and "[fell] headlong{{nbs}}... burst asunder in the midst, and all his bowels gushed out."{{sfn|Zwiep|2004|page=16}} In this account, Judas's death is apparently by accident,{{sfn|Zwiep|2004|page=16}} and he shows no signs of remorse.{{sfn|Zwiep|2004|page=16}}

The early [[Church Fathers|Church Father]] [[Papias of Hierapolis]] records in his ''Expositions of the Sayings of the Lord'' (which was probably written around 100 AD) that Judas was afflicted by God's wrath;{{sfn|Ehrman|2016|page=29}}{{sfn|Zwiep|2004|page=17}} his body became so enormously bloated that he could not pass through a street with buildings on either side.{{sfn|Ehrman|2016|page=29}}{{sfn|Zwiep|2004|page=17}} His face became so swollen that a doctor could not even identify the location of his eyes using an optical instrument.{{sfn|Ehrman|2016|page=29}} Judas's genitals became enormously swollen and oozed with [[pus]] and worms.{{sfn|Ehrman|2016|page=29}} Finally, he killed himself on his own land by pouring out his innards onto the ground,{{sfn|Ehrman|2016|page=29}}{{sfn|Zwiep|2004|page=17}} which stank so horribly that, even in Papias's own time a century later, people still could not pass the site without holding their noses.{{sfn|Ehrman|2016|page=29}}{{sfn|Zwiep|2004|page=17}} This story was well known among Christians in antiquity{{sfn|Zwiep|2004|page=17}} and was often told in competition with the two conflicting stories from the New Testament.{{sfn|Zwiep|2004|page=17}}

According to the apocryphal [[Gospel of Nicodemus]], which was probably written in the fourth century AD, Judas was overcome with remorse{{sfn|Ehrman|2016|page=28}} and went home to tell his wife, who was roasting a chicken on a spit over a charcoal fire, that he was going to kill himself, because he knew Jesus would rise from the dead and, when he did, he would punish him.{{sfn|Ehrman|2016|page=28}} Judas's wife laughed and told him that Jesus could no more rise from the dead than he could resurrect the chicken she was cooking.{{sfn|Ehrman|2016|pages=28–29}} Immediately, the chicken was restored to life and began to crow.{{sfn|Ehrman|2016|page=29}} Judas then ran away and hanged himself.{{sfn|Ehrman|2016|page=29}} In the apocryphal [[Gospel of Judas]], Judas has a vision of the disciples stoning and persecuting him.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.nationalgeographic.com/lostgospel/pdf/GospelofJudas.pdf|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110911005041/http://www.nationalgeographic.com/lostgospel/pdf/GospelofJudas.pdf|url-status=dead|title=Gospel of Judas 44–45|website=[[National Geographic Society]] |archivedate=11 September 2011}}</ref>

The discrepancy between the two different accounts of Judas's death in {{bibleverse||Matthew|27:1–10|9}} and {{bibleverse||Acts|1:18|9}} has proven to be a serious challenge to those who support the idea of [[Biblical inerrancy]].{{sfn|Ehrman|2016|page=28}}{{sfn|Zwiep|2004|page=17}} This problem was one of the points leading [[C. S. Lewis]], for example, to reject the view "that every statement in Scripture must be historical truth".<ref>Letter to Clyde S. Kilby, 7 May 1959, quoted in Michael J. Christensen, ''C. S. Lewis on Scripture'', Abingdon, 1979, Appendix A.</ref> Nonetheless, various attempts at [[Gospel harmony|harmonization]] have been suggested.{{sfn|Zwiep|2004|page=17}} Generally they have followed literal interpretations such as that of [[Augustine of Hippo]], which suggest that these simply describe different aspects of the same event: that Judas hanged himself in the field, and the rope eventually snapped and the fall burst his body open,<ref name="Arie W. Zwiep page 109">{{harvnb|Zwiep|2004|page=109}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.christnotes.org/dictionary.php?dict=ebd&q=Judas |title=Easton's Bible Dictionary: Judas |publisher=christnotes.org |access-date=26 June 2007 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927001538/http://www.christnotes.org/dictionary.php?dict=ebd&q=Judas |archive-date=27 September 2007}}</ref> or that the accounts of Acts and Matthew refer to two different transactions.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.levendwater.org/companion/append161.html |title=The purchase of "the potter's field," Appendix 161 of the Companion Bible |access-date=15 February 2008 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080429193049/http://www.levendwater.org/companion/append161.html |archive-date=29 April 2008}}</ref> Some have taken the descriptions as figurative: that the "falling prostrate" was Judas in anguish,{{efn|''The Monthly Christian Spectator'' 1851–1859 p. 459 "while some writers regard the account of Judas's death as simply figurative{{nbs}}... seized with preternatural anguish for his crime and its consequences his bowels gushed out."}} and the "bursting out of the bowels" is pouring out emotion.{{efn|Clarence Jordan ''The Substance of Faith: and Other Cotton Patch Sermons'' p. 148 "Greeks thought of the bowels as being the seat of the emotions, the home of the soul. It's like saying that all of Judas's motions burst out, burst asunder."}}

Modern scholars reject these approaches; ancient historical works could display differences when reporting events, with variations between [[Tacitus]], [[Suetonius]], and [[Plutarch]] on [[Otho|Otho’s]] death being similar to those in the gospels.<ref>Raymond E. Brown, ''An Introduction to the New Testament'', p. 114.</ref><ref>Charles Talbert, ''Reading Acts: A Literary and Theological Commentary'', Smyth & Helwys (2005) p. 15.</ref><ref>Frederick Dale Bruner, Matthew: A Commentary, Eerdmans (2004), p. 703.</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Licona |first=Mike |title=Why are there Differences in the Gospels? What we can Learn from Ancient Biography |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2016 |isbn=978-0190264260 |pages=2}}</ref> Arie W. Zwiep argues that neither story was meant to be read in light of the other and against harmonizations,{{sfn|Zwiep|2004|page=17}}{{sfn|Zwiep|2004|page=17}} though other scholars argue Luke-Acts used Matthew or vice versa.<ref name=":02">{{Cite book |last=Runesson |first=Anders |title=Jesus, New Testament, Christian Origins |date=2021 |publisher=Eerdmans |isbn=9780802868923}}</ref><ref name="TSP20222">{{Cite book |title=The Synoptic Problem 2022: Proceedings of the Loyola University Conference |publisher=Peeters Pub and Booksellers |year=2023 |isbn=9789042950344}}</ref> David A. Reed argues that the Matthew account is a [[midrash]]ic exposition that allows the author to present the event as a fulfillment of prophetic passages from the Old Testament. They argue that the author adds imaginative details such as the thirty pieces of silver, and the fact that Judas hangs himself, to an earlier tradition about Judas's death.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://academic.shu.edu/btb/vol35/06Reed.pdf |title='Saving Judas': A Social Scientific Approach to Judas's Suicide in Matthew 27:3–10 |author=Reed, David A. |journal=Biblical Theology Bulletin |volume=35 |issue=2 |pages=51–59 |year=2005 |access-date=26 June 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070629151614/http://academic.shu.edu/btb/vol35/06Reed.pdf <!--bot retrieved archive--> |archive-date=29 June 2007 |doi=10.1177/01461079050350020301 |s2cid=144391749}}</ref>

Matthew's description of the death as fulfilment of a prophecy "spoken through Jeremiah the prophet" has caused difficulties, since it does not clearly correspond to any known version of the [[Book of Jeremiah]] but does appear to refer to a story from the [[Book of Zechariah]]<ref>{{Bibleref2|Zechariah|11:12–13|NASB|Zechariah 11:12–13}}</ref> which describes the return of a payment of thirty pieces of silver.<ref>Vincent P. Branick, ''Understanding the New Testament and Its Message'', (Paulist Press, 1998), pp. 126–28.</ref> Even writers such as [[Jerome]] and [[John Calvin]] conclude that this was obviously an error.{{efn|Frederick Dale Bruner, ''Matthew: A Commentary'' (Eerdmans, 2004), p. 710; Jerome, ''Epistolae'' 57.7: "This passage is not found in Jeremiah but in Zechariah, in quite different words and a different order" {{cite web |url=http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf206.v.LVII.html |title=NPNF2-06. Jerome: The Principal Works of St. Jerome – Christian Classics Ethereal Library |access-date=5 September 2008 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081008040849/http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf206.v.LVII.html |archive-date=8 October 2008}}; John Calvin, ''Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists, Matthew, Mark and Luke'', 3:177: "The passage itself plainly shows that the name of Jeremiah has been put down by mistake, instead of Zechariah, for in Jeremiah we find nothing of this sort, nor any thing that even approaches to it." {{cite web |url=http://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/calcom33.ii.xxxvi.html |title=Commentary on Matthew, Mark, Luke – Volume 3 – Christian Classics Ethereal Library |access-date=15 March 2010 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091125155331/http://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/calcom33.ii.xxxvi.html |archive-date=25 November 2009}}.}} Evangelical theologian James R. White has suggested the misattribution arises from a supposed Jewish practice of using the name of a [[major prophet]] to refer to the whole content of the scroll group, including books written by minor prophets placed in the same grouping.<ref>James R. White, ''The King James Only Controversy'', Bethany House Publishers (2009) pp. 213–15, 316.</ref>

Some scholars have suggested that the writer may also have had a passage from Jeremiah in mind,<ref>Donald Senior, ''The Passion of Jesus in the Gospel of Matthew'' (Liturgical Press, 1985), pp. 107–08; Anthony Cane, ''The Place of Judas Iscariot in Christology'' (Ashgate Publishing, 2005), p. 50.</ref> such as chapters {{bibleref2|Jeremiah|18:1–4|NASB|18:1–4}} and {{bibleref2|Jeremiah|19:1–13|NASB|19:1–13}} which refer to a potter's jar and a burial place, and chapter {{bibleref2|Jeremiah|32:6–15|NASB|32:6–15}} which refers to a burial place and an earthenware jar.<ref>{{cite journal |first=Maarten JJ |last=Menken |url=http://www.bsw.org/project/biblica/bibl83/Comm10.html |title=The Old Testament Quotation in Matthew 27:9–10 |journal=[[Biblica (journal)|Biblica]] |issue=83 |date=2002 |pages=9–10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081220115126/http://www.bsw.org/project/biblica/bibl83/Comm10.html |archive-date=20 December 2008}}</ref> [[Raymond E. Brown|Raymond Brown]] suggests "the most plausible [explanation] is that Matthew 27:9–10 is presenting a mixed citation with words taken both from Zechariah and Jeremiah, and{{nbs}}... he refers to that combination by one name. Jeremiah 18–9 concerns a potter (18:2–; 19:1), a purchase (19:1), the Valley of Hinnom (where the Field of Blood is traditionally located, 19:2), 'innocent blood' (19:4), and the renaming of a place for burial (19:6, 11); and Jer 32:6–5 tells of the purchase of a field with silver."<ref name="Brown, The Death of the Messiah">{{cite book |first=Raymond |last=Brown |title=The Death of the Messiah, From Gethsemane to the Grave, Volume 1: A Commentary on the Passion Narratives in the Four Gospels |publisher=[[Yale University Press]] |location=New Haven, Connecticut |year=1998 |isbn=978-0300140095 |page=912}}</ref>

Classicist [[Glenn W. Most]] suggests that Judas's death in Acts can be interpreted figuratively, writing that πρηνὴς γενόμενος should be translated as saying his body went prone, rather than falling headlong, and the spilling of the entrails is meant to invoke the imagery of dead snakes and their burst-open bellies. Hence Luke was stating that Judas took the body posture of a snake and died like one.<ref>{{cite book |author=Most, Glenn W. |year=2008 |contribution=The Judas of the Gospels and the ''Gospel of Judas'' |editor=Scopello, Madeleine |editor-link=Madeleine Scopello |title=The Gospel of Judas in Context: Proceedings of the First International Conference on the Gospel of Judas |publisher=Brill |pages=75–77 |isbn=978-9004167216}}</ref> However, the Catholic biblical scholar [[John L. McKenzie]] states "This passage probably echoes the fate of the wicked in{{nbs}}..." the [[Deuterocanonical books|Deuterocanonical book]] ''Wisdom of Solomon'' 4:19:<ref>{{cite book |last1=McKenzie |first1=John |title=Dictionary of the Bible |date=1966 |publisher=Macmillan Publishing Co. |page=463}}</ref> "...{{nbs}}[the Lord] will dash them speechless to the ground, and shake them from the foundations; they will be left utterly dry and barren, and they will suffer anguish, and the memory of them will perish."<ref>{{cite book |title=The Apochrypha of the Old Testament |date=1977 |publisher=Oxford University Press |page=106}}</ref>

==Betrayal of Jesus==
[[File:The Betrayal Peter raises his sword; Judas hangs himself (f. 45v) Cropped.jpg|thumb|''The Betrayal'': [[Saint Peter|Peter]] raises his sword as the soldiers seize Jesus. Illumination from a western manuscript, {{circa}} 1504.]]
[[File:Le baiser de Judas Heures Charles d'Angoulême XVe.jpg|thumb|The ''Kiss of Judas Iscariot'', a fifteenth-century engraving]]
There are several explanations as to why Judas betrayed Jesus.<ref name="dictionary">{{cite book |first1=Joel B. |last1=Green |first2=Scot |last2=McKnight |first3=I. Howard |last3=Marshall |title=Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels |publisher=InterVarsity Press |location=Downers Grove, Illinois |year=1992 |pages=406–07 |isbn=978-0-8308-1777-1}}</ref> In the earliest account, in the Gospel of Mark, when he goes to the chief priests to betray Jesus, he is offered money as a reward, but it is not clear that money is his motivation.<ref>({{bibleverse||Mark|14:10–11|niv}})</ref> In the Gospel of Matthew account, on the other hand, he asks what they will pay him for handing Jesus over.<ref>({{bibleverse||Matthew|26:14–16|niv}})</ref> In the Gospel of Luke<ref>{{bibleverse||Luke|22:3–6|niv}}</ref> and the Gospel of John,<ref>{{bibleverse||John|13:27|niv}}</ref> the [[devil]] enters into Judas, causing him to offer to betray Jesus. The Gospel of John account has Judas complaining that money has been spent on expensive perfumes to anoint Jesus which could have been spent on the poor, but adds that he was the keeper of the apostles' purse and used to steal from it.<ref>{{bibleverse||John|12:1–6|niv}}</ref> According to some{{who?|date=May 2024}}, Judas thought he could get the money for betraying Jesus without Jesus being killed as he would escape as he had done many times before.<ref name="Theophylact">[https://sites.google.com/site/aquinasstudybible/home/matthew-commentary/theophylact-on-matthew/chapter-1/chapter-2/chapter-3/chapter-4/chapter-5/chapter-6/chapter-7/chapter-8/chapter-9/chapter-10/chapter-11/chapter-12/chapter-13/chapter-14/chapter-15/ch27 ''Theophylact on Matthew'', Chapter 27]{{Dead link|date=November 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}, 3-5.</ref><ref>{{bibleverse||Luke|4:25–30|niv}}</ref><ref>{{bibleverse||John|7:28–30|niv}}</ref><ref>{{bibleverse||John|10:30–39|niv}}</ref>

One suggestion has been that Judas expected Jesus to overthrow Roman rule of [[Judaea (Roman province)|Judea]]. In this view, Judas is a disillusioned disciple betraying Jesus not so much because he loved money, but because he loved his country and thought Jesus had failed it.<ref name="dictionary"/> Another is that Jesus was causing unrest likely to increase tensions with the Roman authorities and they thought he should be restrained until after the Passover, when everyone had gone back home and the commotion had died down.<ref>{{cite book |first=Max I. |last=Dimont |title=Jews, God & History |publisher=[[New American Library]] |location=New York City |edition=2 |date=1962 |page=[https://archive.org/details/jewsgodhistorys00maxi/page/135 135] |isbn=978-0451146946 |url=https://archive.org/details/jewsgodhistorys00maxi/page/135}}</ref>{{verify source|date=June 2020}}

The gospels suggest that Jesus foresaw ({{bibleverse||John|6:64|niv}}, {{bibleverse||Matthew|26:25|niv}}) and allowed Judas's betrayal ({{bibleverse||John|13:27–28|niv}}).{{sfn|Zwiep|2004}} One explanation is that Jesus allowed the betrayal because it would allow God's plan to be fulfilled. Another is that regardless of the betrayal, Jesus was ultimately destined for crucifixion.<ref>''{{usurped|1=[https://archive.today/20120917184349/http://www.religioustolerance.org/gospj3.htm Did Judas betray Jesus]}}'' Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance, April 2006</ref> In April 2006, a Coptic papyrus manuscript titled the [[Gospel of Judas]] from 200 AD was translated, suggesting that Jesus told Judas to betray him,<ref name="foxnews.com">{{cite news |agency=Associated Press |url=https://www.foxnews.com/story/ancient-manuscript-suggests-jesus-asked-judas-to-betray-him |title=Ancient Manuscript Suggests Jesus Asked Judas to Betray Him |website=[[Fox News]] |publisher=[[News Corporation (1980–2013)|News Corp.]] |location=New York City |date=6 April 2006 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130521182025/http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,190826,00.html |archive-date=21 May 2013}}</ref> although some scholars question the translation.<ref name="erudit.org">{{cite journal |first=André |last=Gagné |author-link=André Gagné |title=A Critical Note on the Meaning of APOPHASIS in Gospel of Judas 33:1 |journal=Laval Théologique et Philosophique |volume=63 |issue=2 |date=June 2007 |pages=377–83 |doi=10.7202/016791ar |doi-access=}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=April D. |last=Deconick |title=Gospel Truth |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/01/opinion/01deconink.html?_r=1&oref=slogin |work=[[The New York Times]] |location=New York City |date=1 December 2007 |access-date=1 December 2012 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121022084529/http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/01/opinion/01deconink.html?_r=1&oref=slogin |archive-date=22 October 2012}}</ref> Some scholars believe that it contains no historical information.<ref>{{cite book |last=Pitre |first=Brant |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=i9LvCAAAQBAJ&q=The+case+for+Jesus |title=The Case for Jesus: The Biblical and Historical Evidence for Christ |date=2 February 2016 |publisher=Crown Publishing Group |isbn=978-0-7704-3549-3 |language=en}}</ref>

Judas is the subject of philosophical writings. [[Origen|Origen of Alexandria]], in his ''Commentary on John's Gospel'', reflects on Judas's interactions with the other apostles and Jesus's confidence in him prior to his betrayal.<ref>{{cite journal |first1=Samuel |last1=Laeuchli |title=Origen's Interpretation of Judas Iscariot |url=https://archive.org/details/sim_church-history_1953-12_22_4/page/n1 |journal=Church History |date=1953 |volume=22 |issue=4 |pages=253–68 |doi=10.2307/3161779 |jstor=3161779 |s2cid=162157799}}</ref> Other philosophical reflections on Judas include ''The Problem of Natural Evil'' by [[Bertrand Russell]] and "[[Three Versions of Judas]]", a short story by [[Jorge Luis Borges]]. They allege various problematic ideological contradictions with the discrepancy between Judas's actions and his eternal punishment. Bruce Reichenbach argues that if Jesus foresees Judas's betrayal, then the betrayal is not an act of [[free will]]<ref>{{cite book |first1=John S. |last1=Feinberg |first2=David |last2=Basinger |title=Predestination & free will: four views of divine sovereignty & human freedom |publisher=Kregel Publications |location=Grand Rapids, Michigan |date=2001 |page=91 |isbn=978-0-8254-3489-1}}</ref> and therefore should not be punishable. Conversely, it is argued that just because the betrayal was foretold, it does not prevent Judas from exercising his own free will in this matter.<ref>{{cite book |first=John |last=Phillips |title=Exploring the gospel of John: an expository commentary |publisher=InterVarsity Press |location=Downers Grove, Illinois |year=1986 |page=[https://archive.org/details/predestinationfr00fein/page/254 254] |isbn=978-0-87784-567-6 |url=https://archive.org/details/predestinationfr00fein/page/254}}</ref> Other scholars argue that Judas acted in obedience to God's will.<ref>{{cite book |first1=Bruce |last1=Chilton |first2=Craig A. |last2=Evans |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QRP1wF2b2V8C&pg=PA407 |title=Authenticating the activities of Jesus |publisher=[[Brill Publishers]] |location=Leiden, Netherlands |date=2002 |access-date=8 February 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170313141549/https://books.google.com/books?id=QRP1wF2b2V8C&pg=PA407 |archive-date=13 March 2017 |isbn=978-0391041646}}</ref> The gospels suggest that Judas is apparently bound up with the fulfillment of God's purposes ({{bibleverse||John|13:18|niv}}, {{bibleverse||John|17:12|niv}}, {{bibleverse||Matthew|26:23–25|niv}}, {{bibleverse||Luke|22:21–22|niv}}, {{bibleverse||Matt|27:9–10|niv}}, {{bibleverse||Acts|1:16|niv}}, {{bibleverse||Acts|1:20|niv}}),{{sfn|Zwiep|2004}} yet "woe is upon him", and he would "have been better unborn" ({{bibleverse||Matthew|26:23–25|niv}}). The difficulty inherent in the saying is its paradox: if Judas had not been born, the Son of Man would apparently no longer do "as it is written of him." The consequence of this apologetic approach is that Judas's actions come to be seen as necessary and unavoidable, yet leading to condemnation.<ref>{{cite book |first=Anthony |last=Cane |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=P2hx1FCnNEYC&pg=PA33 |title=The place of Judas Iscariot in Christology |publisher=[[Ashgate Publishing]] |location=Farnham, England |date=2005 |access-date=8 February 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170313074412/https://books.google.com/books?id=P2hx1FCnNEYC&pg=PA33 |archive-date=13 March 2017 |isbn=978-0754652847}}</ref> Another explanation is that Judas's birth and betrayal did not necessitate the only way the Son of Man could have suffered and been crucified. The earliest churches believed "as it is written of him" to be prophetic, fulfilling Scriptures such as that of the suffering servant in Isaiah 52–53 and the righteous one in Psalm 22, which do not require betrayal (at least by ''Judas'') as the means to the suffering. Regardless of any necessity, Judas is held responsible for his act (Mark 14:21; Luke 22:22; Matt 26:24).<ref>{{cite book |first=B.J. |last=Oropeza |title=In the Footsteps of Judas and Other Defectors: The Gospels, Acts, and Johannine Letters |volume=1 |publisher=[[Wipf & Stock]] |location=Eugene, Oregon |date=2011 |pages=145–50 |isbn=978-1610972895}}</ref>

In his 1965 book ''[[The Passover Plot]]'', British New Testament scholar [[Hugh J. Schonfield]] suggests that the crucifixion of Christ was a conscious re-enactment of Biblical [[prophecy]] and that Judas acted with the full knowledge and consent of Jesus in "betraying" him to the authorities. The book has been variously described as "factually groundless",<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |first1=John A.T. |last1=Robinson |author-link=John A. T. Robinson |first2=Gary R. |last2=Habermas |chapter=Can We Trust the New Testament? |encyclopedia=The Historical Jesus: Ancient Evidence for the Life of Christ |publisher=[[College Press]] |location=Joplin, Missouri |date=1996 |isbn=978-0899007328 |page=71}}</ref> based on "little data" and "wild suppositions",<ref>{{cite book |first=John Shelby |last=Spong |author-link=John Shelby Spong |title=The Easter Moment |publisher=[[HarperCollins]] |location=New York City |date=2010 |page=150 |isbn=978-0899007328}}</ref> "disturbing", and "tawdry".<ref>[[Susan Gubar]], ''Judas: A Biography'' (W. W. Norton & Company, 2009) pp. 298–99 (referring to several books, including this one).</ref>

==Judas's eternal destination==
The nature of Judas's eternal destination has been a matter of debate within Christian theology. Some have argued that Judas was damned due to the despair which caused him to subsequently commit suicide.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7R0IGTSvIVIC&pg=PA418 |title=A Dictionary of biblical tradition in English literature |author=David L. Jeffrey |access-date=8 February 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170313141610/https://books.google.com/books?id=7R0IGTSvIVIC&pg=PA418 |archive-date=13 March 2017 |isbn=978-0802836342 |year=1992|publisher=W.B. Eerdmans }}</ref> An example of this view is from [[Cornelius à Lapide]], "Judas then added to his former sin the further sin of despair. It was not a more heinous sin, but one more fatal to himself, as thrusting him down to the very depths of hell. He might, on his repentance, have asked (and surely have obtained) pardon of God. But, like [[Cain]], he despaired of forgiveness."<ref>Cornelius Cornelii a Lapide; Thomas Wimberly Mossman ''The great commentary of Cornelius à Lapide,'' [https://www.ecatholic2000.com/lapide/untitled-40.shtml#_Toc385608983 Matthew 27], London: J. Hodges, 1889–1896.</ref> The Theophylact presents a different view, stating that Judas "hanged himself thinking to precede Jesus into [[Christian views on Hades|hades]] and there to plead for his own salvation."<ref name="Theophylact"/> According to the book of Matthew 27:5, Judas did commit suicide by hanging himself.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Bible Gateway passage: Matthew 27:5 – Revised Standard Version |url=https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2027%3A5&version=RSV |access-date=9 June 2025 |website=Bible Gateway |language=en}}</ref> However, according to the book of Acts 1:18, it says that Judas died by falling off a cliff with his intestines spilling out.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Bible Gateway passage: Acts 1:18 – Revised Standard Version |url=https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Acts%201%3A18&version=RSV |access-date=9 June 2025 |website=Bible Gateway |language=en}}</ref> These two accounts are usually considered complementary of one another, suggesting Judas hanged himself and, after either bodily decomposition or a breaking of the noose, fell and burst open.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://enduringword.com/bible-commentary/matthew-27/ |title=Matthew 27 – Jesus' Trial, Death, and Burial |website=Enduring World |date=9 December 2015 |access-date=31 July 2025}}{{unreliable source|date=June 2025}}</ref>

=== Protestant theologians ===
The Catholic theologian [[Erasmus]] believed that Judas was free to change his intention, but [[Martin Luther]] argued in rebuttal that Judas' will was immutable. [[John Calvin]] states that Judas was predestined to damnation but writes on the question of Judas' guilt: "surely in Judas' betrayal, it will be no more right, because God himself willed that his son be delivered up and delivered him up to death, to ascribe the guilt of the crime to God than to transfer the credit for redemption to Judas."<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7R0IGTSvIVIC&pg=PA419 |title=A Dictionary of biblical tradition in English literature |author=David L. Jeffrey |access-date=8 February 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170313090434/https://books.google.com/books?id=7R0IGTSvIVIC&pg=PA419 |archive-date=13 March 2017 |isbn=978-0802836342 |year=1992|publisher=W.B. Eerdmans }}</ref> [[Karl Daub]], in his book ''Judas Ischariot'', writes that Judas should be considered "an incarnation of the devil" for whom "mercy and blessedness are alike impossible."<ref>{{cite book |author1-link=Judas Iscariot |title=The Encyclopaedia Britannica |date=1911 |publisher=The Encyclopaedia Britannica Co. |location=Vol. 15 |page=536 |edition=11th}}</ref>

The [[Geneva Bible]] contains several additional notes concerning Judas Iscariot within its commentaries. In the [[Gospel of Matthew]], after the [[Sanhedrin trial of Jesus|Sanhedrin]] condemns Jesus Christ to death, are added the comments concerning Judas: "...{{nbs}}late repentance brings desperation" (cf. Mat. 27:3), and "Although he abhor his sins, yet is he not displeased there with, but despairs in God's mercies, and seeks his own destruction" (cf. Mat. 27:4). Furthermore, within [[Acts of the Apostles]] is the comment, "Perpetual infamy is the reward of all such as by unlawfully gotten goods buy anything" when Judas purchased the "Field of Blood" with the 30 pieces of silver (cf Acts 1:18).<ref>{{cite book |title=The 1560 Geneva Bible |date=2006 |publisher=The Bible Museum |edition=1st}}</ref>

===Catholic doctrine===
The [[Catholic Church]] took no specific view concerning the damnation of Judas during [[Second Vatican Council|Vatican II]]; speaking in generalities, that Council stated, "[We] must be constantly vigilant so that{{nbs}}... we may not be ordered to go into the eternal fire (cf. Mk. 25, 41) like wicked and slothful servants (cf. Mk. 25, 26), into the exterior darkness where 'there will be the weeping and the gnashing of teeth' (Mt. 22, 13 and 25, 30)."<ref>{{cite book |editor1-link="Constitution on the Church" (section 48) |title=Teachings of the Second Vatican Council |date=1966 |publisher=Newman Press |page=146}}</ref> [[Holy See|The Vatican]] proclaims individuals' Eternal Salvation only through the [[Saint#Christianity#Catholic Church|Canon of Saints]]. There is no '[[Damnation|Canon of the Damned]].'

Thus, there is a school of thought within the Catholic Church that it is unknown whether Judas Iscariot is in Hell; for example, David Endres, writing in ''[[The Catholic Telegraph]]'', cites ''[[Catechism of the Catholic Church]]'' §597 for the inability to make any determination whether Judas is in Hell.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Endres |first1=David |title=Who's In Hell? |journal=The Catholic Telegraph |date=October 2021 |volume=190 |issue=10 |page=7}}</ref> However, while that section of the catechism does instruct Catholics that the personal sin of Judas is unknown but to God, that statement is within the context that the Jewish people have no collective responsibility for Jesus's death: "...{{nbs}}the Jews should not be spoken of as rejected or accursed as if this followed from holy Scripture."<ref>{{cite book |title=Catechism of the Catholic Church |date=1997 |publisher=Libreria Editrice Vaticana |pages=153–154 |edition=2nd}}</ref> This seems to be defining a different doctrinal point (i.e., the relationship of Catholics with Jewish people), rather than making any sort of decision concerning Judas's particular judgment.

[[Ludwig Ott]]'s reference book ''Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma'' identifies Judas Iscariot as an example of a person receiving punishment as a particular judgment.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Ott |first1=Ludwig |title=Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma |date=1954 |publisher=Mercier Press |page=476 |edition=2nd}}</ref>

The [[Roman Catechism|Catechism of the Council of Trent]], which mentions Judas Iscariot several times, wrote that he possessed "motive unworthy" when he entered the priesthood and was thus sentenced to "eternal perdition".<ref>{{cite book |translator1-last=Donovan |translator1-first=Rev. J. |title=Catechism of the Council of Trent |date=1829 |publisher=Lucas Brothers |page=[https://archive.org/details/thecatechismofth00donouoft/page/n217 213]}}</ref> Furthermore, Judas is given as an example of a sinner that will "despair of mercy" because he looked "...{{nbs}}on God as an avenger of crime and not, also, as a God of clemency and mercy."<ref>{{cite book |translator1-last=Donovan |translator1-first=Rev. J. |title=Catechism of the Council of Trent |date=1829 |publisher=Lucas Brothers |page=[https://archive.org/details/thecatechismofth00donouoft/page/n217 365]}}</ref> The [[Roman Catechism|Catechism of the Council of Trent]] continued the tradition of the early Church fathers, such as [[Pope Leo I]] ("...{{nbs}}had [Judas] not thus denied His omnipotence, he would have obtained His mercy{{nbs}}..."),<ref>{{cite book |last1=Aquinas |first1=Thomas |title=Catena Aurea, vol. II |date=2009 |publisher=Preserving Christian Publications |page=932}}</ref> and [[Pope Gregory I]] ("The godless betrayer, shutting his mind to all these things, turned upon himself, not with a mind to repent, but in a madness of self-destruction{{nbs}}... even in the act of dying sinned ''unto the increase'' of his own eternal punishment.")<ref>{{cite book |editor1-last=Toal |editor1-first=M.F. |title=Sunday Sermons of the Great Fathers |series=Vol.2 |date=1958 |publisher=Henry Regnery Co. |page=183}}</ref>

Also, the ''Decree of Justification'', promulgated during Session VI of the [[Council of Trent]], states in Canon 6, "If anyone shall say that it is not in the power of man to make his ways evil, but that God produces evil as well as the good works, not only by permission, but also properly and of Himself, so that the betrayal of Judas is not less His own proper work than the vocation of Paul; let him be anathema."<ref>{{cite book |last1=Denzinger |first1=Henry |title=The Sources of Catholic Dogma |date=1957 |publisher=B. Herder Book Co |page=258 |edition=30th}}</ref> Here, the Council is making it clear that Judas exercised his own free will to commit the betrayal of Jesus Christ, rather than being predestined by God.

Liturgical institutions are part of the expressions of Sacred Tradition of the [[Catholic Church]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Malloy |first1=Christopher |title=False Mercy: Recent Heresies Distorting Catholic Truth |date=2021 |publisher=Sophia Institute Press |page=41}}</ref> Within the 1962 ''Roman Missal'' for the [[Tridentine Mass|Tridentine Latin Mass]], the ''Collect'' for [[Maundy Thursday|Holy Thursday]] states: "O God, from whom Judas received the punishment of his guilt, and the thief the reward of his confession{{nbs}}... our Lord Jesus Christ gave to each a different recompense according to his merits{{nbs}}..."<ref>{{cite web |website=Extraordinary Form.org |title=extraordinaryform.org/propers/Lent6thThursday-HolyD20.pdf |url=https://extraordinaryform.org/propersprint.html |access-date=28 December 2022}}</ref> In his commentary on the [[The Liturgical Year|Liturgical Year]], [[Prosper Guéranger|Abbot Gueranger, O.S.B.]] states that the ''Collect'' reminds Catholics that both Judas and the good thief are guilty, "...{{nbs}}and yet, the one is condemned, the other pardoned."<ref>{{cite book |last1=Gueranger, O.S.B. |first1=Prosper |title=The Liturgical Year |date=2021 |publisher=Preserving Christian Publications |series=Vol.6: ''Passiontide and Holy Week'' |page=375}}</ref> Thus, the [[Tridentine Mass|Tridentine Latin Mass]], as currently celebrated, continues to foster the tradition within the Catholic Church that Judas was punished.

===Other===
In the ''[[Divine Comedy]]'' of [[Dante Alighieri]], Judas is punished for all eternity in the [[Cocytus#In the Divine Comedy|ninth circle of Hell]]: in it, he is devoured by Lucifer, alongside [[Marcus Junius Brutus]] and [[Gaius Cassius Longinus]] (leaders of the group of senators that [[assassination of Julius Caesar|assassinated]] [[Julius Caesar]]). The innermost region of the ninth circle is reserved for traitors of masters and benefactors and is named Judecca, after Judas.

In his 1969 book ''Theologie der Drei Tage'' (English translation: ''[[Mysterium Paschale]]''), [[Hans Urs von Balthasar]] emphasizes that Jesus was not betrayed but surrendered and delivered up by himself, since the meaning of the Greek word used by the New Testament, ''paradidonai'' (παραδιδόναι, {{langx|la|[[wikt:tradere|tradere]]}}), is unequivocally "handing over of self".<ref>{{cite book
|author=[[Hans Urs von Balthasar]]
|title=Mysterium Paschale. The Mystery of Easter
|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=k4hHDwAAQBAJ
|translator=[[Aidan Nichols]]
|publisher=Ignatius Press
|location=San Francisco
|year=2000
|edition=2nd
|orig-date=1990
|page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=k4hHDwAAQBAJ&dq=paradidonai+tradere+%22handing+over%22+Judas&pg=PT77 77]
|isbn=1-68149348-9
}} [https://books.google.com/books?id=GiOmPwAACAAJ 1990 Edition].</ref><ref>{{cite book
|author=Power, Dermot
|title=Spiritual Theology of the Priesthood. The Mystery Of Christ And The Mission Of The Priesthood
|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3GxPe3dhew4C
|publisher=[[A & C Black]]
|location=London
|year=1998
|page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=3GxPe3dhew4C&dq=paradidomi+Balthasar+%22delivering+up%22%22handing+over%22&pg=PA42 42]
|isbn=0-56708595-3
}}</ref> In the "Preface to the Second Edition", Balthasar takes a cue from [[Book of Revelation|Revelation]] {{bibleref2-nb|Rev.|13:8|VULGATE;NIV}}{{Cn|date=August 2024}} ([[Vulgate]]: ''agni qui occisus est ab origine mundi'', [[New International Version|NIV]]: "the Lamb who was slain from the creation of the world") to extrapolate the idea that God as "[[immanent Trinity]]" can endure and conquer godlessness, abandonment, and death in an "eternal super-[[kenosis]]".<ref>Hans Urs von Balthasar (2000) [1990] [https://books.google.com/books?id=k4hHDwAAQBAJ&dq=%22eternal+'super-Kenosis'%22&pg=PT7 Preface to the Second Edition].</ref><ref>{{cite book
|author=Hans Urs von Balthasar
|title=Theo-Drama. Theological Dramatic Theory, Vol. 5: The Last Act
|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=e44KAQAAMAAJ
|translator=Graham Harrison
|publisher=Ignatius Press
|location=San Francisco
|year=1988
|page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=e44KAQAAMAAJ&dq=%22it+must+be+said+that+this%22%22kenosis+of+obedience%22%22must+be+based+on+the+eternal+kenosis+of+the+Divine+Persons+one+to+another%22&pg=123 123]
|quote=it must be said that this "kenosis of obedience" ... must be based on the eternal kenosis of the Divine Persons one to another.
|isbn=0-89870185-6
}}</ref> A Catholic priest, Richard Neuhaus, an admitted student of Balthasar, argues that it is unknown if Judas is in Hell, and it is also possible that Hell could be empty.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Neuhaus |first1=Richard |title=Death on a Friday Afternoon |date=2000 |publisher=Basic Books |page=69}}</ref> However, French [[monsignor]] [[:fr:Léon Cristiani|Léon Cristiani]] considers that Balthasar and Neuhaus are merely recycling the error of [[Origenism]] which includes denying the eternity of Hell "...{{nbs}}by a general rehabilitation of the damned, including, apparently, Satan."<ref>{{cite book |last1=Cristiani |first1=Msgr. Leon |title=Heresies and Heretics |date=1959 |publisher=Hawthorn Books |page=50}}</ref> This error, while not considered a formal heresy, was condemned at a synod in 548 AD, which was subsequently confirmed by [[Pope Vigilius]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Cristiani |first1=Msgr. Leon |title=Heresies and Heretics |date=1959 |publisher=Hawthorn Books |page=51}}</ref>

==Role in apocrypha==
Judas has been a figure of great interest to esoteric groups, such as many Gnostic sects. [[Irenaeus]] records the beliefs of one Gnostic sect, the [[Cainites]], who believed that Judas was an instrument of the [[Sophia (wisdom)|Sophia]], Divine Wisdom, thus earning the hatred of the [[Demiurge]]. His betrayal of Jesus thus was a victory over the materialist world. The Cainites later split into two groups, disagreeing over the ultimate significance of Jesus in their cosmology.

===Syriac Infancy Gospel===
The [[Syriac Infancy Gospel]]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0806.htm/ |title=CHURCH FATHERS: The Arabic Gospel of the Infancy of the Saviour |translator-first1=Alexander |translator-last1=Walker |work=Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. 8 |via=New Advent |access-date=26 October 2018 |archive-date=29 October 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181029191754/http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0806.htm}}</ref> borrows from some of the different versions of the [[Infancy Gospel of Thomas]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://wesley.nnu.edu/sermons-essays-books/noncanonical-literature/noncanonical-literature-gospels/the-first-gospel-of-the-infancy-of-jesus-christ/ |title=The First Gospel of the Infancy of Jesus Christ |work=The Apocraphal Books of the New Testament |orig-date=1901 |editor-first1=Joshua |editor-last1=Williams |date=1995 |publisher=The Wesley Center Online |access-date=23 October 2018 |archive-date=30 August 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170830105636/http://wesley.nnu.edu/sermons-essays-books/noncanonical-literature/noncanonical-literature-gospels/the-first-gospel-of-the-infancy-of-jesus-christ |url-status=dead }}</ref> However, it adds many of its own tales, probably from local legends, including one of Judas. This pseudepigraphic work tells how Judas, as a boy, was possessed by Satan, who caused him to bite himself or anyone else present. In one of these attacks, Judas bit the young Jesus in the side; and, by touching Him, Satan was exorcised. It further states that the side which Judas supposedly bit was the same side that was pierced by the [[Holy Lance]] at the [[Crucifixion of Jesus|Crucifixion]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://bible.oremus.org/?passage=John+19:31%E2%80%9337&version=nrsv|title=oremus Bible Browser : John 19:31–37|website=bible.oremus.org}}</ref>

===Gospel of Judas===
{{Main article|Gospel of Judas}}

[[File:Codex Tchacos p33.jpg|thumb|upright=1|First page of the Gospel of Judas (Page 33 of [[Codex Tchacos]])]]
During the 1970s, a [[Coptic language|Coptic]] [[papyrus]] [[codex]] (book) was discovered near Beni Masah, [[Egypt]]. It appeared to be a third- or fourth-century copy of a second-century original,<ref>[http://www9.nationalgeographic.com/lostgospel/timeline.html Timeline of early Christianity] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060408052440/http://www9.nationalgeographic.com/lostgospel/timeline.html |date=8 April 2006}} at ''National Geographic''</ref><ref>"[https://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4882420.stm Judas 'helped Jesus save mankind'] " BBC News, 7 May 2006 (following ''National Geographic'' publication)</ref> relating a series of conversations in which Jesus and Judas interact and discuss the nature of the universe from a Gnostic viewpoint. The discovery was given dramatic international exposure in April 2006 when the US ''[[National Geographic (magazine)|National Geographic]]'' magazine published a feature article entitled "The Gospel of Judas" with images of the fragile codex and analytical commentary by relevant experts and interested observers (but not a comprehensive translation). The article's introduction stated: "An ancient text lost for 1,700 years says Christ's betrayer was his truest disciple."<ref>Cockburn A "[http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2006/05/judas-gospel/cockburn-text.html The Gospel of Judas] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130810140529/http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2006/05/judas-gospel/cockburn-text.html |date=2013-08-10}}" ''National Geographic'' (USA) May 2006</ref> The article points to some evidence that the original document was extant in the second century: "Around A.D. 180, [[Irenaeus]], Bishop of Lyon, in what was then Roman Gaul, wrote a massive treatise called ''[[On the Detection and Overthrow of the So-Called Gnosis|Against Heresies]]'' [in which he attacked] a 'fictitious history,' which 'they style the Gospel of Judas.{{' "}}<ref>Cockburn A [http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2006/05/judas-gospel/cockburn-text/3 at p. 3] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091218080221/http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2006/05/judas-gospel/cockburn-text/3 |date=18 December 2009}}</ref>

Before the magazine's edition was circulated, other news media gave exposure to the story, abridging and selectively reporting it.<ref name="foxnews.com"/>

In December 2007, [[April DeConick]] asserted that the ''National Geographic''{{'}}s translation is badly flawed: "For example, in one instance the ''National Geographic'' transcription refers to Judas as a 'daimon,' which the society's experts have translated as 'spirit.' However, the universally accepted word for 'spirit' is 'pneuma'{{snd}}in Gnostic literature "daimon" is always taken to mean 'demon.{{' "}}<ref>Deconick A D "[https://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/01/opinion/01deconink.html Gospel Truth] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170701003449/http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/01/opinion/01deconink.html |date=2017-07-01}}" ''The New York Times'' 1 December 2007</ref> The National Geographic Society responded that "Virtually all issues April D. DeConick raises about translation choices are addressed in footnotes in both the popular and critical editions."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.dgepress.com/natgeo/|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120216070514/http://press.nationalgeographic.com/pressroom/index.jsp?pageID=pressReleases_detail&siteID=1&cid=1196944434958|url-status=dead|title=National Geographic – National Geographic|archivedate=16 February 2012}}</ref> In a later review of the issues and relevant publications, critic [[Joan Acocella]] questioned whether ulterior intentions had not begun to supersede historical analysis, e.g., whether publication of The Gospel of Judas could be an attempt to roll back ancient anti-semitic imputations. She concluded that the ongoing clash between scriptural fundamentalism and attempts at revision were childish because of the unreliability of the sources. Therefore, she argued, "People interpret, and cheat. The answer is not to fix the Bible but to fix ourselves."<ref>Acocella J. "[https://newyorker.com/arts/critics/atlarge/2009/08/03/090803crat_atlarge_acocella?currentPage=all Betrayal: Should we hate Judas Iscariot?] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090831042606/http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/atlarge/2009/08/03/090803crat_atlarge_acocella?currentPage=all |date=2009-08-31}}" ''The New Yorker'' 3 August 2009</ref> Other scholars have questioned the initial translation and interpretation of the Gospel of Judas by the ''National Geographic'' team of experts.<ref name="erudit.org"/>

===Gospel of Barnabas===
{{Also|Islamic view of Jesus's death}}
According to the [[Gospel of Barnabas]], a late medieval [[Pseudepigrapha|pseudepigraphical]] gospel, it was Judas, not Jesus, who was crucified on the cross. This work states that when Judas led the Roman soldiers to arrest Jesus in an effort to betray him, angels appeared to take Jesus out a window and up to the heavens. As Judas entered the room, his appearance was transformed to that of Jesus, and the Romans arrested him and brought him to be crucified. The narrative states this transformation of appearance not only fooled the Romans, but the Pharisees, the High Priest, the followers of Christ, and his mother Mary. The Gospel of Barnabas then mentions that after three days since burial, Judas's body was stolen from his grave with rumors spreading of Jesus being risen from the dead. In following with Islamic lore, when Jesus was informed in the third heaven about what happened he prayed to God to be sent back to the earth, and later descended and gathered his mother, disciples, and followers and told them the truth of what happened. He then ascended back to the heavens, with the narrative continuing Islamic legend mirroring Christian doctrine of returning at the end of times as a just king.

The Gospel of Barnabas was not written by Barnabas ({{fl.|first century CE}}).<ref>{{cite book |last1=Campbell |first1=William F. |title=Gospel of Barnabas: Its True Value |date=1989 |publisher=Christian Study Centre|isbn=1-881085-02-3}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Kollmann |first1=Bernd |title=Joseph Barnabas: His Life and Legacy |date=2004 |publisher=Liturgical Press |isbn=978-08-14651-70-4}}</ref> Many of its teachings are synchronous with those in the [[Quran]] and oppose the [[Bible]], especially the [[New Testament]]. The earliest known mention of the Gospel of Barnabas has been discovered in a 1634 manuscript by a Morisco which was found in Madrid, and the earliest published reference to it was in the 1715 book ''Menagiana'' by the French poet Bernard de la Monnoye. 

An unrelated "Gospel according to Barnabas" was first mentioned in the sixth-century [[Gelasian Decree]], and was condemned as apocryphal.<ref name="Sox">{{Cite book |title=The Gospel of Barnabas |url=https://archive.org/details/gospelofbarnabas0000soxd |date=1984 |last=Sox |first=David |publisher=[[Allen & Unwin]] |isbn=0-04-200044-0 |url-access=registration }}</ref>{{rp|25}} Another mention of a gospel using his name is in the seventh-century ''List of the Sixty Books'',<ref>{{Cite book |title=The Apocryphal New Testament: A Collection of Apocryphal Christian Literature in an English Translation |date=2005 |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |last=Elliott |first=J. K. |isbn=978-01-91068-53-9 }}</ref>{{rp|xxiv}} or the ''Catalogue of the Sixty Canonical Books''.<ref>{{Cite book |title=The Encyclopedia of the Bible and its Reception |editor-last1=Furey |editor-first1=Constance M. |editor-last2=Matz |editor-first2=Brian |editor-last3=McKenzie |editor-first3=Steven L. |editor-last4=Römer |editor-first4=Thomas |editor-last5=Schröter |editor-first5=Jens |editor-last6=Walfish |editor-first6=Barry Dov |editor-last7=Ziolkowski |editor-first7=Eric |last=Nickel |first=Gordon L. |chapter=Barnabas, Gospel of |isbn=978-31-10183-55-9 |date=2009 |publisher=[[De Gruyter]] }}</ref>{{rp|533}} Historians are uncertain whether these refer to this Gospel of Barnabas, since no quotes have been preserved for confirmation.<ref name="Sox" />{{rp|25}} Jomier believes a forger could have taken the title after the publishing of the Gelasian Decree by printing press.<ref name="Geisler">Geisler, Norman L. & Abdul Saleeb "Answering Islam: The Crescent in Light of the Cross" Baker Books, 2002, p. 304.</ref>

The Gospel of Barnabas is criticized by Muslim scholars,<ref name="answer">{{Cite book |title=Answering Islam: The Crescent in Light of the Cross |last1=Geisler |first1=Norman |author-link1=Norman Geisler |last2=Saleeb |first2=Abdul |date=1993 |isbn=0-8010-3859-6 |publisher=[[Baker Books]] }}</ref>{{rp|298}} who reject it partially<ref name="sura">{{Cite book |title=The Qur'an and the Cross – A Study of Al-Nisa (4):157: 'and They Did Not Kill Him and Did Not Crucify Him, But It Was Made to Appear So to Them' |date=2020 |publisher=[[LIT Verlag]] |last=O'Brien |first=Jack |isbn=978-36-43910-82-0 }}</ref>{{rp|101}} or completely.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://religiondispatches.org/muslim-gospel-revealing-the-christian-truth-excites-the-da-vinci-code-set/ |title='Muslim Gospel' Revealing the 'Christian Truth' Excites The Da Vinci Code Set |date=22 May 2014 |work=[[Religion Dispatches]] |last=Reed |first=Annette Yoshiko |access-date=27 May 2022 |archive-date=31 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201031104258/https://religiondispatches.org/muslim-gospel-revealing-the-christian-truth-excites-the-da-vinci-code-set/ |url-status=live }}</ref> According to American scholar [[Amina Inloes]], the many differences between the gospel and the Quran dilute its importance.<ref name="forgery">{{Cite journal |url=https://www.academia.edu/22980858 |journal=Islamic Writings: The Student Journal of the Islamic College |title=The Gospel of Barnabas: A Muslim Forgery? |last=Inloes |first=Amina |author-link=Amina Inloes |volume=6 |issue=1 |date=2016 |pages=49–65 |access-date=2022-05-23 |archive-date=2022-05-23 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220523122334/https://www.academia.edu/22980858/The_Gospel_of_Barnabas_A_Muslim_Forgery |url-status=live }}</ref> In the January 1977 issue of the ''Islamic World League'' journal, Syrian writer Yahya al-Hashimi called it a polemic by a Jew to generate hostility between Christians and Muslims.<ref name="Sox" />{{rp|115}}<ref name="de">{{Cite web |url=https://www.chrislages.de/barnarom.htm |title=The 'Gospel of Barnabas' in recent research |website={{ill|Christlich-Islamische Gesellschaft|de}} |access-date=22 May 2022 |last=Slomp |first=Jan |archive-date=7 April 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220407071312/https://www.chrislages.de/barnarom.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> Al-Hashimi said that there was no need to use apocryphal gospels to prove that Muhammad was a prophet, because he believed Muhammad had been foretold by Jesus as the [[Paraclete#Islam|Paraclete]] in the [[Gospel of John]].<ref name="de" /> Egyptian literary critic [[Abbas Mahmoud al-Aqqad]] cited several reasons to reject the gospel, including the use of [[Andalusi Arabic]] phrases and teachings which conflict with the Quran.<ref name="value">{{Cite book <!--url=http://www.muhammadanism.org/campbell/barnabas_letter_format.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101127050314/http://muhammadanism.org/campbell/barnabas_letter_format.pdf |archive-date=2010-11-27 |url-status=live--> |title=Gospel of Barnabas: Its True Value |date=1989 |isbn=1-881085-02-3 |last=Campbell |first=William F. |publisher=Christian Study Centre }}</ref>{{rp|34}}<ref name="de" />

==Representations==
[[File:Beso de Judas.png|thumb|A red-haired Judas betrays Jesus with [[kiss of Judas|a kiss]] in a Spanish ''[[paso (float)|paso]]'' figure.]]
Although the sanctification of the instruments of the [[Passion of Jesus]] (the so-called ''[[Arma Christi]]''), that slowly accrued over the course of the Middle Ages in Christian symbolism and art, also included the head and lips of Judas,<ref>{{cite book
|author=John Parker
|title=The Aesthetics of Antichrist. From Christian Drama to Christopher Marlowe
|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=eaFhDwAAQBAJ
|publisher=Cornell University Press
|location=Ithaca, New York
|year=2018
|edition=2nd
|orig-date=2007
|page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=eaFhDwAAQBAJ&dq=%22the+same+bizarre+sanctification+that+slowly+accrued+over+the+course+of+the+Middle+Ages+to+the+wood+of+the+cross,+the+nails,+the+side-piercing+spear,+and+other+instruments+of+Christ's+torture+(the+so-called+arma+Christi)+accrued+also+to+the+head+and+lips+of+Judas%22&pg=PA110 110]
|isbn=978-0-80146354-9
}}</ref> the term ''Judas'' has entered many languages as a synonym for ''betrayer'', and Judas has become the archetype of the traitor in Western art and literature. Judas is given some role in virtually all literature telling the Passion story and appears in numerous modern novels and movies.

In the [[Eastern Orthodoxy|Eastern Orthodox]] hymns of [[Holy Wednesday]] (the Wednesday before [[Easter|Pascha]]), Judas is contrasted with the woman who anointed Jesus with expensive perfume and washed his feet with her tears. The hymns of Holy Wednesday contrast these two figures, encouraging believers to avoid the example of the fallen disciple and instead to imitate Mary's example of repentance. Also, Wednesday is observed as a day of fasting from meat, dairy products, and olive oil throughout the year in memory of the betrayal of Judas. The prayers of preparation for receiving the [[Eucharist]] also make mention of Judas's betrayal: "I will not reveal your mysteries to your enemies, neither like Judas will I betray you with a kiss, but like the thief on the cross I will confess you."

Judas Iscariot is often shown with [[red hair]] in [[Spanish culture]]<ref name="DRAE">[http://buscon.rae.es/draeI/SrvltObtenerHtml?LEMA=pelo&SUPIND=0&CAREXT=10000&NEDIC=No#pelo_de_cofre,_o_pelo_de_Judas. pelo de Judas] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101205231140/http://buscon.rae.es/draeI/SrvltObtenerHtml?LEMA=pelo&SUPIND=0&CAREXT=10000&NEDIC=No |date=5 December 2010}} ("Judas hair") in the ''[[Diccionario de la Real Academia Española]]''.</ref><ref name="Eclectic">[https://books.google.com/books?id=WX3QAAAAMAAJ&dq=judas+hair&pg=PA314 Page 314] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170313090124/https://books.google.com/books?id=WX3QAAAAMAAJ&dq=judas%20hair&pg=PA314|date=13 March 2017}} of article ''Red Hair'' from ''[[Bentley's Miscellany]]'', July 1851. ''[[The eclectic magazine of foreign literature, science, and art]]'', Volumen 2; Volumen 23, [[Leavitt, Trow, & Co.]], 1851.</ref><ref name="Blanco">[[iarchive:lettersfromspai00whigoog/page/n273|<!--quote=judas hair.--> p. 256]] {{Cite book |last1=White |first1=Joseph Blanco |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=O5UMAAAAYAAJ&dq=judas%20hair&pg=PA256 |title=Letters from Spain |publisher=H. Colburn |isbn=9781508427162 |access-date=19 July 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170313141322/https://books.google.com/books?id=O5UMAAAAYAAJ&dq=judas%20hair&pg=PA256 |archive-date=13 March 2017 |url-status=bot: unknown}} of ''[[Letters from Spain]]'', [[Joseph Blanco White]], [[H. Colburn]], 1825.</ref> and by [[William Shakespeare]].<ref name="Blanco"/><ref name="Glossary">[https://books.google.com/books?id=EWcPAAAAYAAJ&dq=judas+hair&pg=PA473 Judas colour] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170313095246/https://books.google.com/books?id=EWcPAAAAYAAJ&dq=judas%20hair&pg=PA473 |date=13 March 2017}} in p. 473 of ''A glossary: or, Collection of words, phrases, names, and allusions to customs, proverbs, etc., which have been thought to require illustration, in the words of English authors, particularly [[Shakespeare]], and his contemporaries,'' Volumen 1. [[Robert Nares]], [[James Orchard Halliwell-Phillipps]], [[Thomas Wright (antiquarian)|Thomas Wright]]. J. R. Smith, 1859</ref> The practice is comparable to the [[Renaissance]] portrayal of Jews with red hair, which was then regarded as a negative trait and which may have been used to correlate Judas Iscariot with contemporary Jews.<ref>''Judas's Red Hair and The Jews'', ''Journal of Jewish Art (9)'', 1982, Melinnkoff R.M</ref>
[[File:Judas Iscariot in Stained Glass Depiction.jpg|thumb|In the [[Church of St John the Baptist, Yeovil|Church of St. John the Baptist]], [[Yeovil]], one stained glass window depicts Judas with a black halo.]]
[[Last Supper in Christian art|In paintings depicting the Last Supper]], Judas is occasionally depicted with a dark-colored [[Halo (religious iconography)|halo]] (contrasting with the lighter halos of the other apostles) to signify his former status as an apostle. More commonly, however, he is the only one at the table without one. Some church [[stained glass|stained-glass]] windows show him with a dark halo such as in one of the windows of the [[Church of St John the Baptist, Yeovil]].

==Art and literature==
[[File:Autun cathédrale chapiteau pendaison de Judas.jpg|thumb|[[Cathédrale Saint-Lazare d'Autun|Cathédrale Saint-Lazare]], [[Autun]]. Judas hangs himself]]
*Judas is the subject of one of the oldest surviving English ballads, which dates from the thirteenth century. In the ballad [[Judas (ballad)|"Judas"]], the blame for the betrayal of Christ is placed on Judas's sister.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Baum |first1=Paull Franklin |title=The English Ballad of Judas Iscariot |jstor-access=free |journal=PMLA |date=1916 |volume=31 |issue=2 |pages=181–89 |doi=10.2307/456954 |jstor=456954}}</ref>
*One of the most famous depictions of Judas Iscariot and his kiss of betrayal of Jesus is ''[[The Taking of Christ (Caravaggio)|The Taking of Christ]]'' by Italian Baroque artist [[Caravaggio]], painted in 1602.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nga.gov/exhibitions/caravbr-2.htm |title=Caravaggio's ''The Taking of Christ'' |website=NGA |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150114203245/http://www.nga.gov/exhibitions/caravbr-2.htm |archive-date=14 January 2015}}</ref>
*[[Edward Elgar]]'s [[oratorio]], ''[[The Apostles (Elgar)|The Apostles]]'', depicts Judas as wanting to force Jesus to declare his divinity and establish the kingdom on earth.<ref name="notes">{{Citation |editor-last=Adams|editor-first=Byron|title=Edward Elgar and His World |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ubxdak5Kxv4C&pg=PA140 |year=2007|publisher=Princeton University Press|isbn=978-0-691-13446-8|pages=140–41}}</ref>
*In ''Trial of Christ in Seven Stages'' (1909) by [[John Brayshaw Kaye]], the author did not accept the idea that Judas intended to betray Christ, and the poem is a defence of Judas, in which he adds his own vision to the biblical account of the story of the trial before the Sanhedrin and Caiaphas.<ref name="mag">''[[The Magazine of poetry]], Volume 2, Issues 1–4'' (1890) [[Charles Wells Moulton]], Buffalo, New York {{cite web |year=1890 |title=The Magazine of Poetry |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EdgKAAAAYAAJ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170313090846/https://books.google.com/books?id=EdgKAAAAYAAJ&source=gbs_navlinks_s |archive-date=13 March 2017 |access-date=19 July 2016}}</ref>
*In [[Mikhail Bulgakov]]'s novel ''[[The Master and Margarita]]'', Judas is paid by the high priest to testify against Jesus, who had been inciting trouble among the people of Jerusalem. After authorizing the crucifixion, [[Pontius Pilate|Pilate]] suffers an agony of regret and turns his anger on Judas, ordering him assassinated.
*"[[Three Versions of Judas|Tres versiones de Judas]]" (English title: "Three Versions of Judas") is a short story by Argentine writer and poet [[Jorge Luis Borges]]; it was included in Borges's anthology ''[[Ficciones]]'', published in 1944, and revolves around the main character's doubts about the canonical story of Judas who instead creates three alternative versions.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.equinoxpub.com/home/|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120515064643/http://www.equinoxpub.com/equinox/books/showbook.asp?bkid=430|url-status=dead|title=Equinox Publishing Home|archivedate=15 May 2012|website=Equinox Publishing}}</ref>
* The rock opera ''[[Jesus Christ Superstar]]'', initially released as a 1970 concept album by [[Tim Rice]] and [[Andrew Lloyd Webber]], is loosely based on the Gospel Accounts of the Passion with much of the plot centred on Judas, who is dissatisfied with how Jesus steers his disciples. 
*In ''[[The Last Days of Judas Iscariot]]'' (2005), a critically acclaimed play by [[Stephen Adly Guirgis]], Judas is given a trial in [[Purgatory]].<ref>{{cite news |author=Ben Brantley |title=THEATER REVIEW; Judas Gets His Day in Court, but Satan Is on the Witness List |url=http://theater.nytimes.com/mem/theater/treview.html?res=9B06E0DB133DF930A35750C0A9639C8B63 |newspaper=The New York Times |date=3 March 2005 |access-date=6 November 2013}}</ref>
*''[[The Book of Longings]]'' by [[Sue Monk Kidd]] features Judas as the adopted brother of the fictional protagonist, Ana. Judas is reimagined as a [[Zealot]] extremist who only betrays Jesus in the belief that he will resist the authorities and trigger a Judean revolution against Rome.<ref>Scharper, Diane. [https://www.ncronline.org/opinion/book-reviews/sue-monk-kidds-new-novel-imagines-jesus-life-and-fictional-marriage "Sue Monk Kidd's new novel imagines Jesus's life and fictional marriage"], ''[[National Catholic Reporter]]'', 12 June 2021. Retrieved 26 August 2024.</ref>

==See also==
{{Portal|Biography|Christianity}}
*[[Burning of Judas]]
*[[Auricularia auricula-judae|Judas's Ear mushroom]] ''(Auricularia auricula-judae)''
*[[Judas goat]]
*[[Cercis siliquastrum|Judas tree]]
*[[List of unsolved deaths]]
*[[Valerius Gratus]] – Roman governor of Judea who appointed Joseph ben Caiaphas to become Jewish High Priest.

==Explanatory notes==
{{Notelist}}

==Citations==
{{Reflist}}

===General and cited references===
{{Refbegin|30em}}
*{{cite book |last=Ehrman |first=Bart D. |author-link=Bart D. Ehrman |date=1999 |title=Jesus: Apocalyptic Prophet of the New Millennium |location=Oxford, England |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0195124743}}
*{{cite book |last=Ehrman |first=Bart D. |date=2016 |title=Jesus Before the Gospels: How the Earliest Christians Remembered, Changed, and Invented their Stories of the Savior |location=New York City |publisher=HarperOne |isbn=978-0-06-228520-1}}
*{{cite book |last=Gubar |first=Susan |author-link=Susan Gubar |date=2009 |title=Judas: A Biography |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GwmZ4FaxhKcC&q=biography+of+Judas+Iscariot |location=New York City and London, England |publisher=W. W. Norton & Company |isbn=978-0-393-06483-4 }}
*{{cite Catholic Encyclopedia |wstitle=Judas Iscariot |volume=8 |first=William Henry |last=Kent}}
*{{cite book |last=Oropeza |first=B. J. |author-link=B. J. Oropeza |date=2012 |title=In the Footsteps of Judas and Other Defectors: Apostasy in the New Testament Communities, Vol. 1: Gospels, Acts, and Johannine Letters |location=Eugene |publisher=Cascade |isbn=9781610972895}}
*{{cite book |last=Stanford |first=Peter |author-link=Peter Stanford |date=2015 |title=Judas: The Most Hated Name in History |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kGtiCwAAQBAJ&q=biography+of+Judas+Iscariot |location=Berkeley, California |publisher=Counterpoint |isbn=978-1-61902-750-3 }}{{Dead link|date=November 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}
*{{cite book |last=Zwiep |first=Arie W. |date=2004 |title=Judas and the Choice of Matthias: A Study on Context and Concern of Acts 1:15–26 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yUmI4US6rOUC&q=death+of+Judas&pg=PA17 |series=Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2. Reihe |volume=187 |location=Tübingen, Germany |publisher=Mohr Siebeck |isbn=978-3-16-148452-0 }}
{{Refend}}

==External links==
{{Prone to spam|date=January 2023}}
<!--     
      {{No more links}}

Please be cautious adding more external links.

Wikipedia is not a collection of links and should not be used for advertising.

Excessive or inappropriate links will be removed.

See [[Wikipedia:External links]] and [[Wikipedia:Spam]] for details.

If there are already suitable links, propose additions or replacements on
the article's talk page.

-->
{{Wikiquote}}
{{Commons and category|Judas Iscariot|Judas Iscariot}}
*[https://jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/9033-judas-iscariot "Judas Iscariot"] in the ''[[Jewish Encyclopedia]]''
*[https://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/01/opinion/01deconink.html "Gospel Truth"]: piece in ''[[The New York Times]]'' on the Gospel of Judas

{{Apostles}}
{{New Testament people}}
{{Authority control}}

[[Category:Judas Iscariot| ]]
[[Category:30s deaths]]
[[Category:Accidental deaths from falls]]
[[Category:Accidental deaths in Israel]]
[[Category:Ancient suicides]]
[[Category:Characters in the Divine Comedy]]
[[Category:Christianity and antisemitism]]
[[Category:Demonic possession]]
[[Category:Suicides by hanging in Israel]]
[[Category:Twelve Apostles]]
[[Category:Unsolved deaths]]
[[Category:Year of birth unknown]]
[[Category:Male suicides]]
[[Category:People in the Gospel of John]]
[[Category:People in the Gospel of Luke]]
[[Category:People in the Gospel of Matthew]]
[[Category:People in the Gospel of Mark]]