View source for File-hosting service

{{short description|Internet hosting service for user files}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2023}}

A '''file-hosting service''', also known as '''cloud-storage service''', '''online file-storage provider''', or '''cyberlocker''', is an [[internet]] hosting service specifically designed to host user [[Computer file|files]]. These services allow users to [[upload]] files that can be accessed over the internet after providing a username and password or other [[authentication]]. Typically, file hosting services allow [[HTTP|HTTP access]], and in some cases, [[File Transfer Protocol|FTP access]]. Other related services include content-displaying hosting services (i.e. [[Video hosting service|video]] and [[image hosting service|image]]), virtual storage, and [[Remote backup service|remote backup]] solutions.

==Uses==
=== Personal file storage ===
{{Further|Comparison of file hosting services}}
Personal file storage services are designed for private individuals to store and access their files online. Users can upload their files and share them publicly or keep them password-protected.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Share OneDrive files and folders |url=https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/share-onedrive-files-and-folders-9fcc2f7d-de0c-4cec-93b0-a82024800c07 |access-date=2022-04-22 |website=Microsoft Support |archive-date=2 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230602174124/https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/share-onedrive-files-and-folders-9fcc2f7d-de0c-4cec-93b0-a82024800c07 |url-status=live }}</ref>

Document-sharing services allow users to share and collaborate on document files. These services originally targeted files such as [[PDF]]s, [[word processor]] documents, and [[spreadsheet]]s.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Geel |first1=Matthias |title=Cloud Storage: File Hosting and Synchronisation 2.0 |url=http://www.vis.ethz.ch/de/visionen/pdfs/2012/visionen_2012_3.pdf?end=15&start=11 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170731064101/http://www.vis.ethz.ch/de/visionen/pdfs/2012/visionen_2012_3.pdf?end=15&start=11 |archive-date=31 July 2017 |access-date=5 August 2014}}</ref> However many remote file storage services are now aimed at allowing users to share and synchronize all types of files across all the devices they use.

===File sync and sharing services===
[[File synchronization|File syncing]] and [[File sharing service|sharing service]]s allow users to create special folders on each of their computers or mobile devices, which are then synchronized across all devices. Files placed in this folder can be accessed through a website or mobile app and easily shared with others for viewing or collaboration.<ref>{{cite magazine|last1=Metz|first1=Rachel|title=How Dropbox Could Rule a Multi-Platform World|url=http://www.technologyreview.com/news/516951/how-dropbox-could-rule-a-multi-platform-world/|magazine=MIT Technology Review|access-date=5 August 2014|date=9 July 2013}}</ref>

Consumer products such as [[OneDrive]] and [[Google Drive]] have made file hosting and sharing more accessible and popular for personal and business use.<ref>[http://www.download3k.com/articles/MultCloud-Review-Manage-multiple-cloud-services-search-and-transfer-between-them-00949  How to transfer files from Dropbox to Google Drive] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161112080428/http://www.download3k.com/articles/MultCloud-Review-Manage-multiple-cloud-services-search-and-transfer-between-them-00949 |date=12 November 2016 }}. Retrieved 24 December 2014</ref>

=== Content caching ===
Content providers who encounter bandwidth congestion issues may use [[Content delivery network|specialized services for distributing cached or static content]]. This is especially common for companies with a major internet presence.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.macworld.com/news/2004/06/15/akamai/|title=Macworld.com|access-date=7 February 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070313001736/http://www.macworld.com/news/2004/06/15/akamai/|archive-date=13 March 2007|url-status=dead}}</ref>

=== Backup and disaster recovery ===
Many businesses use file hosting services as part of their backup and disaster recovery strategies. By storing copies of important files offsite in a secure [[data center]], they can quickly recover from data loss due to hardware failure, [[natural disaster]]s, or other unexpected events.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Introduction to Backup and Disaster Recovery {{!}} IBM |url=https://www.ibm.com/topics/backup-disaster-recovery |access-date=2023-03-08 |website=www.ibm.com |date=16 September 2021 |language=en-us |archive-date=5 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230605080204/https://www.ibm.com/topics/backup-disaster-recovery |url-status=live }}</ref>

==Storage charges==
Some online file storage services offer space on a per-[[gigabyte]] basis, and sometimes include a [[Bandwidth (computing)|bandwidth]] cost component as well. Usually these will be charged monthly or yearly. Some companies offer the service for free, relying on advertising revenue.{{citation needed|date=August 2014}} Some hosting services do not place any limit on how much space the user's account can consume. Non-paying users' accounts may be deleted or suspended after a predefined period of inactivity.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Cahane |first=Amir |title=The Right not to Forget: Cloud Based Services Moratoriums in War Zones and Data Portability Rights |url=https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3944667 |journal=Rights to Privacy and Data Protection in Armed Conflict |date=15 September 2021 |ssrn=3944667 |access-date=27 June 2023 |archive-date=22 December 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211222192512/https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3944667 |url-status=live }}</ref>

Some services require a software download which makes files only available on computers which have that software installed, others allow users to retrieve files through any web browser. With the increased inbox space offered by [[webmail]] services, many users have started using their webmail service as an online drive. Some sites offer free unlimited file storage but have a limit on the file size. Some sites offer additional online storage capacity in exchange for new customer referrals.

Many providers offer tiered storage levels, charging differently based on frequency of access and retrieval latency. There may be a different cost associated with access vs storage. For example, in a cold storage scenario, the price per GB stored over time can be very low, but it may take longer to access an item at a higher per GB retrieval cost.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Stockton |first=Ben |date=2020-11-20 |title=Hot Storage vs Cold Storage in 2023: Instant Access vs Archiving |url=https://www.cloudwards.net/hot-storage-vs-cold-storage/ |access-date=2023-08-14 |website=Cloudwards |language=en}}</ref> In some cases, users may have to commit to retrieval being much higher latency as well.

==One-click hosting==
'''One-click hosting''', sometimes referred to as cyberlocker<ref>{{cite web|url=http://torrentfreak.com/cyberlockers-take-over-file-sharing-lead-from-bittorrent-sites-110111/|title=Cyberlockers Take Over File-Sharing Lead From BitTorrent Sites|access-date=2011-07-12|archive-date=17 July 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110717102409/http://torrentfreak.com/cyberlockers-take-over-file-sharing-lead-from-bittorrent-sites-110111/|url-status=live}}</ref> generally describes [[web service]]s that allow [[internet]] users to easily upload one or more files from their [[hard disk drive|hard drive]]s (or from a remote location) onto the one-click host's [[Server (computing)|server]] free of charge.

Most such services simply return a [[Uniform Resource Locator|URL]] which can be given to other people, who can then fetch the file later. In many cases these URLs are predictable allowing potential misuse of the service.<ref>Nikiforakis N., Balduzzi M. Van Acker S., Joosen W. and Balzarotti D. [http://www.usenix.org/event/leet11/tech/full_papers/Nikiforakis.pdf "Exposing the Lack of Privacy in File Hosting Services] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110915154356/http://www.usenix.org/event/leet11/tech/full_papers/Nikiforakis.pdf |date=15 September 2011 }}</ref> {{As of|2005}}{{Update inline|date=May 2025}} these sites have drastically increased in popularity, and subsequently, many of the smaller, less efficient sites have failed.  Although one-click hosting can be used for many purposes, this type of [[file sharing]] has, to a degree, come to compete with [[Peer-to-peer|P2P]] [[filesharing]] services.<ref>Roettgers, Janko. [https://web.archive.org/web/20130603125434/http://gigaom.com/2007/06/17/one-click-hosters/ "Piracy Beyond P2P: One-Click Hosters"], Retrieved: 5 January 2008.</ref>

The sites make money through advertising or charging for premium services such as increased downloading capacity, removing any wait restrictions the site may have or prolonging how long uploaded files remain on the site. Premium services include facilities like unlimited downloading, no waiting, maximum download speed etc. Many such sites implement a [[CAPTCHA]] to prevent automated downloading. Several programs aid in downloading files from these one-click hosts; examples are [[JDownloader]], FreeRapid, Mipony, Tucan Manager and CryptLoad.

== Use for copyright infringement ==
{{main|File sharing|Legal aspects of file sharing}}
{{File sharing sidebar|expanded=technologies}}
File hosting services may be used as a means to [[File sharing|distribute or share files]] without consent of the copyright owner. In such cases one individual [[upload]]s a file to a file hosting service, which others can then [[download]]. Legal assessments can be very diverse.

For example, in the case of [[Switzerland|Swiss]]{{En dash}}[[Germany|German]] file hosting service [[RapidShare]], in 2010 the US government's congressional international anti-[[Copyright infringement#"Piracy"|piracy]] [[caucus]] declared the site a "notorious illegal site", claiming that the site was "overwhelmingly used for the global exchange of illegal movies, music and other copyrighted works".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://systema.in/blog/2010/05/riaa-unveils-list-of-notorious-illegal-sites/|title=RIAA joins congressional caucus in unveiling first-ever list of notorious illegal sites|date=2010-05-19|publisher=[[RIAA]]|access-date=2011-01-16|archive-date=26 October 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171026001341/http://systema.in/blog/2010/05/riaa-unveils-list-of-notorious-illegal-sites/|url-status=dead}}</ref> But in the legal case ''Atari Europe S.A.S.U. v. Rapidshare AG'' in Germany,<ref name="atari v rapidshare">Legal case: OLG Dusseldorf, Judgement of 22.03.2010, Az I-20 U 166/09 dated 22 March 2010.</ref> the [[Düsseldorf]] higher regional court examined claims related to alleged infringing activity and reached the conclusion on appeal that "most people utilize RapidShare for legal use cases"<ref>{{cite web|last=Roettgers|first=Janko|title=RapidShare Wins in Court|url=http://gigaom.com/video/rapidshare-wins-in-court/|publisher=Gigaom.com|access-date=2011-01-16|date=2010-05-03|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110226013817/http://gigaom.com/video/rapidshare-wins-in-court/|archive-date=26 February 2011|postscript=. Citation from ruling: "Es ist davon auszugehen, dass die weit überwiegende Zahl von Nutzern die Speicherdienste zu legalen Zwecken einsetzen und die Zahl der missbräuchlichen Nutzer in der absoluten Minderheit ist." ("It is to be expected that the vast majority of users use the storage services for lawful purposes and the number of abusive users are in the absolute minority.").}}</ref> and that to assume otherwise was equivalent to inviting "a general suspicion against shared hosting services and their users which is not justified".<ref>From the ''Atari v. RapidShare'' ruling: "entspricht einem Generalverdacht gegen Sharehoster-Dienste und ihre Nutzer, der so nicht zu rechtfertigen ist" ("corresponds to a general suspicion against shared hosting services and their users, which is not to justify such").</ref> The court also observed that the site removes copyrighted material when asked, does not provide search facilities for illegal material, noted previous cases siding with RapidShare, and after analysis the court concluded that the plaintiff's proposals for more strictly preventing sharing of copyrighted material – submitted as examples of anti-piracy measures RapidShare might have adopted – were found to be "unreasonable or pointless".<ref name="atari v rapidshare" />

By contrast, in January 2012, the [[United States Department of Justice]] seized and shut down the file hosting site [[Megaupload.com]] and commenced criminal cases against its owners and others. Their [[indictment]] concluded that Megaupload differed from other online file storage businesses, suggesting [[Megaupload#Basis of indictment|a number of design features]] of its [[business model|operating model]] as being evidence showing a criminal intent and venture.<ref name="megaupload indictment - reasons">[https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970204616504577171180266957116 Department of Justice indictment, on the ''Wall Street Journal''{{'}}s website] {{Webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20120715035322/http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204616504577171180266957116.html |date=15 July 2012 }} – see sections 7–14.</ref> Examples cited included reliance upon advertising revenue and other activities showing the business was funded by (and heavily promoted) downloads and not storage, defendants' communications helping users who sought infringing material, and defendants' communications discussing their own evasion and infringement issues. {{As of|2014}}, the case has not yet been heard.<ref>{{cite web|title=Release For Victim Notification ''United States v. Kim Dotcom, et al'', Crim. No. 1:12CR3 (E.D. Va. O'Grady, J.)|url=https://www.justice.gov/usao/vae/megaupload.html|publisher=United States Department of Justice|access-date=10 November 2014|archive-date=27 October 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141027111237/http://www.justice.gov/usao/vae/megaupload.html|url-status=live}}</ref>{{Update inline|date=June 2021|reason=Has it been heard since then?}} A year later, Megaupload.com relaunched as [[Mega (service)|Mega]].

In 2016, the file hosting site [[Putlocker]] has been noted by the [[Motion Picture Association of America]] for being a major piracy threat,<ref>{{cite news |last=Prabhu |first=Vijay |date=17 October 2016 |title=Yet Another Video Streaming Service Bites The Dust, Putlocker Shuts Down |url=http://www.techworm.net/2016/10/putlocker-video-streaming-service-shuts.html |publisher=TechWorm |access-date=10 November 2016 |archive-date=19 October 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161019000409/http://www.techworm.net/2016/10/putlocker-video-streaming-service-shuts.html |url-status=live }}</ref> and in 2012, Alfred Perry of [[Paramount Pictures]] listed Putlocker as one of the "top 5 rogue cyberlocker services", alongside Wupload, [[FileServe]], Depositfiles, and [[MediaFire]].<ref>{{cite web |last=Sandoval |first=Greg |date=31 March 2012 |title=MPAA wants more criminal cases brought against 'rogue' sites |url=https://www.cnet.com/news/mpaa-wants-more-criminal-cases-brought-against-rogue-sites/ |publisher=[[CNET]] |access-date=10 November 2016 |archive-date=9 March 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180309012109/https://www.cnet.com/news/mpaa-wants-more-criminal-cases-brought-against-rogue-sites/ |url-status=live }}</ref>

== Security ==
The emergence of [[cloud storage]] services has prompted much discussion on security.<ref name="Howstuffworks">{{cite web | url=http://computer.howstuffworks.com/cloud-computing/cloud-storage3.htm/ | title=How Cloud Storage Works | publisher=How Stuff Works | access-date=2013-05-08 | author=Jonathan Strickland | date=30 April 2008 | archive-date=29 April 2013 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130429091352/http://computer.howstuffworks.com/cloud-computing/cloud-storage3.htm | url-status=live }}</ref> Security, as it relates to cloud storage can be broken down into:

=== Access and integrity security===
Deals with the question of [[Information assurance|confidentiality and availability]], and may be expressed with questions of the kind: Will the user be able to continue accessing their data? Who else can access it? Who can change it?

Whether the user is able to continue accessing their data depends on a large number of factors, ranging from the location and quality of their internet connection, and the physical integrity of the provider's data center, to the financial stability of the storage provider (because, even if perfectly fit from a technical point of view, if the provider financially goes out of business, then its services go offline too).

The question of who can access and, potentially, change, their data, ranges from what [[physical access control]]s are in place in the provider's data center to what [[Data center security|technical steps have been taken]], such as access control, [[encryption]], etc.

Many [[cloud storage service]]s state that they either encrypt data before it is uploaded or while it is stored. While encryption is generally regarded as best practice in cloud storage<ref name="Techtarget">{{cite web | url=http://searchcloudsecurity.techtarget.com/resources/Cloud-Data-Storage-Encryption-and-Data-Protection-Best-Practices | title=Cloud Data Storage, Encryption and Data Protection Best Practices | publisher=Techtarget.com | access-date=2013-05-08 | archive-date=2 May 2013 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130502073605/http://searchcloudsecurity.techtarget.com/resources/Cloud-Data-Storage-Encryption-and-Data-Protection-Best-Practices | url-status=live }}</ref> how the encryption is implemented is very important.

Consumer-grade, public file hosting and synchronization services are popular, but for business use, they create the concern that corporate information is exported to devices and cloud services that are not controlled by the organization.

Some cloud storage providers offer granular [[Access-control list|ACLs]] for application keys. One important permission is [[Comparison of file hosting services#cite note-append-only-2|append-only]], which is distinct from simple "read", "write", and "read-write" permissions in that all existing data is immutable.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.borgbase.com/|title=BorgBase - Secure hosting for your BorgBackup Repos|website=BorgBase - Simple Borg Repo Hosting|access-date=3 December 2019|archive-date=3 December 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191203113838/https://www.borgbase.com/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://wasabi.com/blog/use-immutable-storage/|title=Why Use Immutable Storage?|date=11 September 2018|website=Wasabi|access-date=3 December 2019|archive-date=3 December 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191203113834/https://wasabi.com/blog/use-immutable-storage/|url-status=live}}</ref> Append-only support is especially important to mitigate the risk of [[data loss]] for [[backup]] policies in the event that the computer being backed-up becomes infected with [[ransomware]] capable of deleting or encrypting the victim's backups.<ref name=PB_1>{{cite book| title=PayBreak: Defense Against Cryptographic Ransomware| author1=Kolodenker, E.| author2=Koch, W.| author3=Stringhini, G.| author4=Egele, M.| url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315862748| date=2 April 2017|
access-date=5 December 2023| doi=10.1145/3052973.3053035| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201022012939/https://eugenekolo.com/static/paybreak.pdf| url-status=live| archive-date=22 October 2020}}</ref><ref name=AR_1>{{cite book| chapter=A Roadmap for Improving the Impact of Anti-ransomware Research| author1=Pont, J.| author2=Abu Oun, O.| author3=Brierley, C.| author4=Arief, B.| author5=Hernandez-Castro, J.| title=Secure IT Systems| series=Lecture Notes in Computer Science| chapter-url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337215603| pages=137–154| date=1 November 2019| volume=11875| access-date=5 December 2023| doi=10.1007/978-3-030-35055-0_9| isbn=978-3-030-35054-3| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191203113831/https://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/ba284/Papers/NordSec2019.pdf| url-status=live| archive-date=3 December 2019}}</ref>

===Data encryption===
Secret key encryption is sometimes referred to as [[zero-knowledge proof|zero knowledge]], meaning that only the user has the encryption key needed to decrypt the data. Since data is encrypted using the secret key, identical files encrypted with different keys will be different. To be truly zero knowledge, the file hosting service must not be able to store the user's passwords or see their data even with physical access to the servers. For this reason, secret key encryption is considered the highest level of access security in cloud storage.<ref name="Makeuseof.com">{{cite web | url=http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/5-ways-to-securely-encrypt-your-files-in-the-cloud/ | title=5 Ways To Securely Encrypt Your Files in the Cloud | date=26 May 2012 | publisher=Makeuseof.com | access-date=2013-05-08 | archive-date=7 May 2013 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130507025406/http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/5-ways-to-securely-encrypt-your-files-in-the-cloud/ | url-status=live }}</ref> This form of encryption is rapidly gaining popularity, with companies such as [[Mega (service)|MEGA]]<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://mega.nz/security|title=MEGA has been designed around user-controlled end-to-end encryption. MEGA's end-to-end encryption (E2EE) paradigm enhances the overall security by providing 'privacy by design', unlike many of its competitors who only provide 'privacy by policy'.|website=MEGA Privacy|access-date=5 June 2019|archive-date=14 June 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190614215450/https://mega.nz/security|url-status=live}}</ref> (previously Megaupload) and [[SpiderOak]] being entirely zero knowledge file storage and sharing.<ref name="SpiderOak.com">{{cite web|url=https://spideroak.com/zero-knowledge/|title=SpiderOak - Zero Knowledge Privacy with Encrypted Cloud Backup|access-date=29 September 2014|archive-date=9 October 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141009131632/https://spideroak.com/zero-knowledge/|url-status=live}}</ref>

Since secret key encryption results in unique files, it makes [[data deduplication]] impossible and therefore may use more storage space.<ref name="Secure Data Deduplication">{{cite web |title=Secure Data Deduplication |first1=Mark W. |last1=Storer |first2=Kevin |last2=Greenan |first3=Darrell D. E. |last3=Long |first4=Ethan L. |last4=Miller |url=http://www.ssrc.ucsc.edu/Papers/storer-storagess08.pdf |publisher=Ssrc.ucsc.edu |access-date=8 May 2013 |archive-date=22 August 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130822211856/http://www.ssrc.ucsc.edu/Papers/storer-storagess08.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>

[[Convergent encryption]] derives the key from the file content itself and means an identical file encrypted on different computers result in identical encrypted files.<ref name="Secure Data Deduplication" /> This enables the cloud storage provider to [[data deduplication|de-duplicate]] data blocks, meaning only one instance of a unique file (such as a document, photo, music or movie file) is actually stored on the cloud servers but made accessible to all uploaders. A third party who gained access to the encrypted files could thus easily determine if a user has uploaded a particular file simply by encrypting it themselves and comparing the outputs.<ref name="Secure Data Deduplication" />

Some point out that there is a theoretical possibility that organizations such as the [[RIAA]], [[MPAA]], or a government could obtain a warrant for US law enforcement to access the cloud storage provider's servers and gain access to the encrypted files belonging to a user.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://thenextweb.com/apps/2011/09/23/bitcasa-infinite-storage-comes-to-your-desktop-but-so-do-big-questions/ | title=Bitcasa: Infinite storage comes to your desktop, but so do big questions | website=TheNextWeb.com | access-date=2013-05-08 | author=Brad McCarty | date=23 September 2011 | archive-date=22 July 2016 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160722061307/http://thenextweb.com/apps/2011/09/23/bitcasa-infinite-storage-comes-to-your-desktop-but-so-do-big-questions/ | url-status=live }}</ref> By demonstrating to a court how applying the convergent encryption methodology to an unencrypted copyrighted file produces the same encrypted file as that possessed by the user would appear to make a strong case that the user is guilty of possessing the file in question and thus providing evidence of [[copyright infringement]] by the user.

There is, however, no easily accessible public record of this having been tried in court as of May 2013 and an argument could be made that, similar to the opinion expressed by Attorney Rick G. Sanders of Aaron | Sanders PLLC in regards to the iTunes Match "Honeypot" discussion,<ref>{{cite web | url=https://thenextweb.com/apple/2011/09/16/is-itunes-match-a-honeypot-for-music-pirates-a-copyright-lawyer-weighs-in/ | title=Is iTunes Match a honeypot for music pirates? A copyright lawyer weighs in | website=TheNextWeb.com | access-date=2013-05-08 | author=Brad McCarty | date=16 September 2011 | archive-date=8 March 2016 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160308035537/http://thenextweb.com/apple/2011/09/16/is-itunes-match-a-honeypot-for-music-pirates-a-copyright-lawyer-weighs-in/ | url-status=live }}</ref> that a warrant to search the cloud storage provider's servers would be hard to obtain without other, independent, evidence establishing probable cause for copyright infringement. Such legal restraint would obviously not apply to the [[secret police]] of an [[Authoritarianism|oppressive government]] who could potentially gain access to the encrypted files through various forms of [[hacker (computer security)|hacking]] or other [[cybercrime]].

===Ownership security===
{{Expand section|1=Deals with the questions: Who owns the data the user uploads? Will the act of uploading change the ownership?
|date=January 2020}}

== See also ==
*[[Comparison of file hosting services]]
*[[Comparison of file synchronization software]]
*[[Comparison of online backup services]]
*[[Comparison of online music lockers]]
*[[List of backup software]]
*[[Shared resource]]
*[[Cloud storage]]

== References ==
{{Reflist|30em}}
{{File hosting service}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:File Hosting Service}}
[[Category:File hosting| ]]
[[Category:Social software|File hosting]]
[[Category:Records management]]