View source for Evolution and the Catholic Church

{{Short description|Attitude of the Catholic Church to evolution theory}}
{{Creationism sidebar}}
{{Intelligent Design}}

The [[Catholic Church]] holds no official position on the theory of creation or [[evolution]], leaving the specifics of either [[theistic evolution]] or literal creationism to the individual within certain parameters established by the Church. According to the ''[[Catechism of the Catholic Church]]'', any believer may accept either literal or [[special creation]] within the [[Genesis creation narrative|period of an actual six-day, twenty-four-hour period]], or they may accept the belief that the earth evolved over time under the guidance of [[God in Christianity|God]]. [[Catholic theology|Catholicism]] holds that God initiated and continued the process of his creation, that [[Adam and Eve]] were real people,<ref>{{Cite web |title=What do Catholics believe about Adam and Eve? {{!}} Commonweal Magazine |url=https://www.commonwealmagazine.org/what-do-catholics-believe-about-adam-and-eve |access-date=2022-12-29 |website=www.commonwealmagazine.org |date=2 November 2011 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Adam and Eve Were Real People |url=https://www.catholic.com/qa/adam-and-eve-were-real-people |access-date=2022-12-29 |website=Catholic Answers}}</ref> and that all humans, whether specially created or evolved, have and have always had specially created souls for each individual.<ref name="Richard P. McBrien">{{cite book|url = https://archive.org/details/harpercollinsenc00mcbr|url-access = registration|page = [https://archive.org/details/harpercollinsenc00mcbr/page/771 771]|title =The HarperCollins Encyclopædia of Catholicism|year = 1995|quote=From this most primitive form of life, the {{sic|hide=y|divinely|-}}guided process of evolution by natural selection brought about higher life forms.|author=[[Richard P. McBrien]]|publisher = [[HarperCollins]]|isbn = 9780006279310|access-date = 2007-10-18}}</ref><ref name=communion/>

Early contributions to biology were made by Catholic scientists such as the Augustinian friar [[Gregor Mendel]]. Since the publication of [[Charles Darwin]]'s ''[[On the Origin of Species]]'' in 1859, the attitude of the [[Catholic Church]] on the theory of [[evolution]] has slowly been refined. For nearly a century, the [[papacy]] offered no authoritative pronouncement on Darwin's theories. In the 1950 [[encyclical]] ''[[Humani generis]]'', [[Pope Pius XII]] confirmed that there is no intrinsic conflict between [[Christianity]] and the theory of evolution, provided that Christians believe that God created all things and that the individual [[soul]] is a [[creationism (soul)|direct creation]] by [[God in Christianity|God]] and not the product of purely material forces.<ref>{{cite news |title=Catholics and the Evolving Cosmos |first=John |last=Farrell |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703846604575447493644515142 |newspaper=[[The Wall Street Journal]] |date=August 27, 2010 |access-date=September 11, 2012}}</ref> {{As of|2013|alt=Today}}, the Church supports [[theistic evolution]], also known as ''evolutionary creation''.<ref name="Alberta">{{cite web|url = http://www.lastseminary.com/genesis-modern-science/Evolutionary%20Creation.pdf|title = Evolutionary Creation|quote = Evolutionary creation best describes the official position of the Roman Catholic Church,{{Citation needed|date=March 2024|reason=A Papal Encyclical or higher teaching is required to constitute an official position, as the teaching from the Papal Encyclical Humani Generis states that Catholics may believe in certain aspects of evolutionary theory, but does not give an official Catholic Church position. This document makes reference to no such teaching.}} though it is often referred to in this tradition as 'theistic evolution.'|publisher = [[University of Alberta]]|access-date = 2007-10-18|archive-date = 2012-01-04|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120104203221/http://www.lastseminary.com/genesis-modern-science/Evolutionary%20Creation.pdf|url-status = dead}}</ref>

[[Catholic school]]s teach evolution as part of their science curriculum. They teach the fact that evolution occurs and that [[Neo-Darwinism|modern evolutionary synthesis]] is how evolution proceeds.

==Early contributions to evolutionary theory==
[[File:Gregor Mendel.png|thumb|Abbot [[Gregor Mendel]] (1822-1884), Augustinian friar and founder of [[genetics]]. His work and that of Darwin laid the groundwork for the study of life sciences in the twentieth century.]]

Catholics' contributions to the development of evolutionary theory included those of the Augustinian friar [[Gregor Mendel]] (1822-1884). Mendel entered the [[Brno]] Augustinian monastery in 1843, but also trained as a scientist at the Olmutz Philosophical Institute and at the [[University of Vienna]]. The Brno monastery was a centre of scholarship, with an extensive library and tradition of scientific research.<ref>[[Bill Bryson]]; ''[[A Short History of Nearly Everything]]''; Black Swan; 2004; p.474</ref> At the monastery, Mendel discovered the basis of [[genetics]] following long study of the inherited characteristics of pea plants, although his paper ''[[Experiments on Plant Hybridization]]'', published in 1866, remained largely overlooked until the start of the next century.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.mendel-museum.com/eng/1online/room1.htm|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130323053842/http://www.mendel-museum.com/eng/1online/room1.htm|url-status=dead|title=Biography of Mendel at the Mendel Museum|archivedate=March 23, 2013}}</ref> 

He developed mathematical formulae to explain the occurrence, and confirmed the results in other plants. Where Darwin's theories suggested a mechanism for improvement of species over generations, Mendel's observations provided explanation for how a new species itself could emerge. Though Darwin and Mendel never collaborated, they were aware of each other's work (Darwin read a paper by [[Wilhelm Olbers Focke]] which extensively referenced Mendel). [[Bill Bryson]] writes that "without realizing it, Darwin and Mendel laid the groundwork for all of life sciences in the twentieth century. Darwin saw that all living things are connected, that ultimately they trace their ancestry to a single, common source; Mendel's work provided the mechanism to explain how that could happen".<ref>[[Bill Bryson]]; ''[[A Short History of Nearly Everything]]''; Black Swan; 2004; p.474-476</ref>  Biologist [[J. B. S. Haldane]] and others brought together the principles of [[Mendelian inheritance]] with [[Darwinian]] principles of evolution to form the field of genetics known as the [[Modern synthesis (20th century)|modern evolutionary synthesis]].<ref>[[Bill Bryson]]; ''[[A Short History of Nearly Everything]]''; Black Swan; 2004; p.300</ref>

Changing awareness of the [[age of the Earth]] and [[fossil record]]s helped in the development of evolutionary theory. The work of the Danish scientist [[Nicolas Steno]] (1638-1686), who converted to Catholicism and became a bishop, helped establish the science of [[geology]], leading to modern scientific measurements of the [[age of the Earth]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/history/steno.html|title=Nicholas Steno|website=ucmp.berkeley.edu}}</ref>

==Early reaction to Charles Darwin's theories==
Catholic concern about evolution has always been very largely concerned with the implications of [[evolutionary theory]] for the origin of the human species; even by 1859, a literal reading of the ''[[Book of Genesis]]'' had long been undermined by developments in  [[geology]] and other fields.<ref>O'Leary, 7–15; Harrison, section "The Defence: Fr. Domenichelli"; Brundell, 84</ref> No high-level Church pronouncement has ever attacked head-on the theory of evolution as applied to non-human species<ref>Harrison, especially Conclusion section 2</ref> although a bishop of the church did excommunicate [[Gregorio Chil y Naranjo]] for his scientific work defending Darwin and Lamarck.<ref>
{{cite book|title=A history of the warfare of science with theology in Christendom (2 Volume Set)|isbn=0879758260|last1=White|first1=Andrew Dickson|year=1993|publisher=Prometheus Books }}
</ref>

Even before the development of modern scientific method, Catholic theology had allowed for biblical text to be read as allegorical, rather than literal, where it appeared to contradict that which could be established by science or reason. Thus Catholicism has been able to refine its understanding of scripture in light of scientific discovery.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/science/sc0043.htm|title=Catholic Education Resource Center}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.asa3.org/ASA/PSCF/1988/PSCF3-88Young.html|title=THE CONTEMPORARY RELEVANCE OF AUGUSTINE|website=www.asa3.org}}</ref> Among the early [[Church Father]]s there was debate over whether God created the world in six days, as [[Clement of Alexandria]] taught,<ref>Clement of Alexandria, ''Stromata'' Book VI, "For the creation of the world was concluded in six days" http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/02106.htm</ref> or in a single moment as held by [[Augustine of Hippo|Augustine]],<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia| publisher = Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing| isbn = 978-0-8028-3843-8| pages = 377–378|editor= Allan D. Fitzgerald | last = Teske| first = Roland J.| title = Genesi ad litteram liber imperfectus, De| encyclopedia = Augustine Through the Ages: An Encyclopedia| year = 1999}}</ref> and a literal interpretation of Genesis was normally taken for granted in the [[Middle Ages]] and later, until it was rejected in favour of [[uniformitarianism]] (entailing far greater timeframes) by a majority of geologists in the 19th century.<ref>{{cite book | last = Hongzhen | first = Wang | title = Comparative Planetology, Geological Education & History of Geosciences | publisher = Brill Academic Publishers | location = Boston | year = 1997 | isbn = 90-6764-254-1 |page=262|quote=Uniformitarianism has dominated geological thinking since Lyell's time<!-- Charles Lyell published his highly influential 'Principles of Geology' in 1830 -->}}</ref> However, modern literal creationism has had little support among the higher levels of the [[Catholic Church|Church]].

The Catholic Church delayed official pronouncements on Darwin's ''Origin of Species'' for many decades.<ref>Brundell, 86-87</ref> While many hostile comments were made by local clergy, ''Origin of Species'' was never placed on the ''[[Index Librorum Prohibitorum]]'';<ref>Rafael Martinez, professor of the philosophy of science at the Santa Croce Pontifical University in Rome, in a speech reported on [http://www.cinews.ie/article.php?artid=5793 Catholic Ireland net] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090607000752/http://www.cinews.ie/article.php?artid=5793 |date=2009-06-07 }} Accessed May 26, 2009</ref> in contrast, [[Henri Bergson]]'s non-Darwinian ''[[Creative Evolution (book)|Creative Evolution]]'' (1907) was on the ''Index'' from 1948 until the ''Index'' was abolished in 1966.<ref>[http://www.cvm.qc.ca/gconti/905/BABEL/Index%20Librorum%20Prohibitorum-1948.htm 1948 ''Index'' listing] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150901092447/http://www.cvm.qc.ca/gconti/905/BABEL/Index%20Librorum%20Prohibitorum-1948.htm |date=2015-09-01 }}—for some reason the date of publication is given as 1914 not 1907</ref> However, a number of Catholic writers who published works specifying how evolutionary theory and Catholic theology might be reconciled ran into trouble of some sort with the Vatican authorities.<ref>The six leading examples are the subject of Artigas's book. Apart from Léroy, Zahm and Bonomelli, discussed below, there were [[St. George Jackson Mivart]], the English Bishop John Hedley, and Raffaello Caverni. Each of these has a chapter in Artigas, and is also covered by Brundell.</ref>  According to the historian of science and theologian Barry Brundell: "Theologians and historians of science have always been struck by the seemingly enigmatic response of Rome when it did come; the authorities were obviously unhappy with the propagation of 'Christianized evolution', but it seems they were not willing or able to say so straight out and in public".<ref>Brundell, 81</ref>  [[H.L. Mencken]] observed that:

{{blockquote|[The advantage of Catholics] lies in the simple fact that they do not have to decide either for Evolution or against it.  Authority has not spoken on the subject; hence it puts no burden upon conscience, and may be discussed realistically and without prejudice.  A certain wariness, of course, is necessary.  I say that authority has not spoken; it may, however, speak tomorrow, and so the prudent man remembers his step.  But in the meanwhile there is nothing to prevent him examining all available facts, and even offering arguments in support of them or against them—so long as those arguments are not presented as dogma.<ref>[http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/vaticanview.html The Vatican's View of Evolution: The Story of Two Popes] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090221042514/http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/vaticanview.html |date=2009-02-21 }} by Doug Linder (2004) citing ''H. L. Mencken on Religion'' by S. T. Joshi (2002), p. 163</ref>}}

==19th century reception among Catholics==

The first notable statement after Darwin published his theory in 1859 appeared in 1860 from a council of the German bishops, who pronounced:

{{blockquote|Our first parents were formed immediately by God. Therefore we declare that the opinion of those who do not fear to assert that this human being, man as regards his body, emerged finally from the spontaneous continuous change of imperfect nature to the more perfect, is clearly opposed to Sacred Scripture and to the Faith.<ref>Quoted in Harrison(2001)</ref>}}

The concentration of concern on the implications of evolutionary theory for the human species was to remain typical of Catholic reactions.  No Vatican response was made to this, which some have taken to imply agreement.<ref>Harrison(2001)</ref> No mention of evolution was made in the pronouncements of the [[First Vatican Council]] in 1868. In the following decades, a consistently and aggressively anti-evolution position was taken by the influential [[Society of Jesus|Jesuit]] periodical [[La Civiltà Cattolica]], which, though unofficial, was generally believed to have accurate information about the views and actions of the Vatican authorities.<ref>Artigas, 2,5,</ref> The opening in 1998 of the [[Archive of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith]] (in the 19th century called the [[Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith|Holy Office]] and the [[Congregation of the Index]]) has revealed that on many crucial points this belief was mistaken, and the periodical's accounts of specific cases, often the only ones made public, were not accurate. The original documents show the Vatican's attitude was much less fixed than appeared to be the case at the time.<ref>Artigas, 2, 5, 7–9, 220 etc.; Brundell, 82-83, 90-92 etc.</ref>

Though he was sensitive to claims to the contrary, [[John Henry Newman]] did not believe that evolution contradicted the Catholic faith.<ref>{{cite web | last=Bellafiore | first=Samuel | title=Newman's Strategic Reassembly of Secular Trends | website=Church Life Journal | date=29 November 2018 | url=https://churchlifejournal.nd.edu/articles/newmans-strategic-reassembly-of-secular-trends/ | access-date=25 April 2025}}</ref> In 1868 he corresponded with a fellow priest regarding [[Charles Darwin|Darwin's]] theory and made the following comments:

{{blockquote|As to the Divine Design, is it not an instance of incomprehensibly and infinitely marvellous Wisdom and Design to have given certain laws to matter millions of ages ago, which have surely and precisely worked out, in the long course of those ages, those effects which He from the first proposed. Mr. Darwin's theory need not then to be atheistical, be it true or not; it may simply be suggesting a larger idea of Divine Prescience and Skill. Perhaps your friend has got a surer clue to guide him than I have, who have never studied the question, and I do not [see] that 'the accidental evolution of organic beings' is inconsistent with divine design—It is accidental to us, not to God.<ref>John Henry Newman, [http://www.disf.org/en/documentation/Newman_Walker_eng.asp Letter to J. Walker of Scarborough, May 22, 1868], ''The Letters and Diaries of John Henry Newman'', Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973</ref>}}

In 1894 a letter was received by the [[Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith|Holy Office]], asking for confirmation of the Church's position on a theological book of generally Darwinist cast by a French [[Dominican Order|Dominican]] theologian, ''L'évolution restreinte aux espèces organiques, par le père Léroy dominicain''. The records of the Holy Office reveal lengthy debates, with a number of experts consulted, whose views varied considerably. In 1895 the Congregation decided against the book, and Fr. Léroy was summoned to Rome, where it was explained that his views were unacceptable, and he agreed to withdraw the book. No decree was issued against Léroy's book, and consequently the book was never placed on the Index.<ref>Artigas, 119-120.</ref> Again, the concerns of the experts had concentrated entirely on [[human evolution]].<ref>Harrison analyses the records at length.</ref>

To reconcile general evolutionary theory with the origin of the human species, with a soul, the concept of "[[special transformism]]" was developed, according to which the first humans had evolved by Darwinist processes, up to the point where a soul was added by God to "pre-existent and living matter" (in the words of [[Pius XII]]'s ''[[Humani generis]]'') to form the first fully human individuals; this would normally be considered to be at the point of conception.<ref>Harrison, Conclusion section 4</ref> Léroy's book endorsed this concept; what led to its rejection by the Congregation appears to have been his view that the human species was able to evolve without divine intervention to a fully human state, but lacking only a soul. The theologians felt that some immediate and particular divine intervention was also required to form the physical nature of humans, before the addition of a soul, even if this was worked on near-human [[hominid]]s produced by evolutionary processes.<ref>Harrison, especially Conclusion sections.</ref>

The following year, 1896, [[John Augustine Zahm]], a well-known American [[Congregation of Holy Cross|Holy Cross]] priest who had been a professor of physics and chemistry at the Catholic [[University of Notre Dame]], Indiana, and was then Procurator General of his Order in Rome, published ''Evolution and Dogma'', arguing that Church teaching, the Bible, and evolution did not conflict.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=JW-f0uBYuOEC&dq=Holy+Cross+%22John+Augustine+Zahm%22+evolution&pg=PR10 Evolution and dogma By John Augustine Zahm] Online text</ref> The book was denounced to the Congregation of the Index, who decided to condemn the book but did not publish the corresponding decree, and consequently, the book was never included on the Index.<ref>Artigas, 124-202</ref> Zahm, who had returned to the United States as [[Provincial superior]] of his Order, wrote to his French and Italian editors in 1899, asking them to withdraw the book from the market; however, he never recanted his views.<ref>The Zahn affair is the subject of Artigas's Chapter 4, and of Appleby's essay</ref> In the meantime his book (in an Italian translation with the [[imprimatur]] of [[Siena]]<ref>Artigas, 209</ref>) had had a great impact on [[Geremia Bonomelli]], the [[Bishop of Cremona]] in Italy, who added an appendix to a book of his own, summarizing and recommending Zahm's views. Bonomelli too was pressured, and retracted his views in a public letter, also in 1898.<ref>Artigas, 209–216</ref>

Zahm, like [[St. George Jackson Mivart]] and his followers, accepted evolution, but not the key [[Darwinist]] principle of [[natural selection]], which was still a common position among biologists in general at the time.  Another American Catholic author [[William Seton (writer)|William Seton]] accepted natural selection also, and was a prolific advocate in the Catholic and general press.<ref>Morrison, throughout</ref>

==Pope Pius IX==
[[File:God2-Sistine Chapel.png|thumb|left|''The Creation of [[Adam]]'', from the [[Sistine Chapel ceiling]], by [[Michelangelo]], c. 1511]]
''[[On the Origin of Species]]'' was published in 1859, during the [[papacy]] of [[Pope Pius IX]], who [[Dogmatic definition|defined dogmatically]] [[papal infallibility]] during the [[First Vatican Council]] in 1869–70. The council has a section on "Faith and Reason" that includes the following on science and faith:

{{blockquote|9. Hence all faithful Christians are forbidden to defend as the legitimate conclusions of science those opinions which are known to be contrary to the doctrine of faith, particularly if they have been condemned by the Church; and furthermore they are absolutely bound to hold them to be errors which wear the deceptive appearance of truth. ...

10. Not only can faith and [[reason]] never be at odds with one another but they mutually support each other, for on the one hand right reason established the foundations of the faith and, illuminated by its light, develops the science of divine things; on the other hand, faith delivers reason from errors and protects it and furnishes it with knowledge of many kinds.|Vatican Council I}}

On God the Creator, the First Vatican Council was very clear. The definitions preceding the "[[anathema]]" (as a technical term of [[Catholicism|Catholic]] [[theology]], let him be "cut off" or [[excommunicated]], cf. ''Galatians'' 1:6–9; ''Titus'' 3:10–11; ''Matthew'' 18:15–17) signify an infallible [[doctrine]] of the Catholic Faith (De Fide):
{{blockquote|
# On God the creator of all things
## If anyone denies the one true God, creator and lord of things visible and invisible: let him be anathema.
## If anyone is so bold as to assert that there exists nothing besides matter: let him be anathema.
## If anyone says that the substance or essence of God and that of all things are one and the same: let him be anathema.
## If anyone says that finite things, both corporal and spiritual, or at any rate, spiritual, emanated from the divine substance; or that the divine essence, by the manifestation and evolution of itself becomes all things or, finally, that God is a universal or indefinite being which by self-determination establishes the totality of things distinct in genera, species and individuals: let him be anathema.
## If anyone does not confess that the world and all things which are contained in it, both spiritual and material, were produced, according to their whole substance, [[ex nihilo|out of nothing]] by God; or holds that God did not create by his [[Free will|will free from all necessity]], but as necessarily as he necessarily loves himself; or denies that the world was created for the glory of God: let him be anathema.}}

According to Catholic theologian Dr. [[Ludwig Ott]] in his 1952 treatise ''Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma'',<ref>''Grundriss der Katholischen Dogmatik'' (in [[German language|German]]), Ludwig Ott, Verlag Herder, Freibury, 1952; First published in [[English language|English]] as ''Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma'', Ludwig Ott, translated by Dr. Patrick Lynch and edited by James Canon Bastible, D.D.,The Mercier Press, Limited, May, 1955.</ref> it is to be understood that these condemnations are of the errors of modern [[materialism]] (that matter is all there is), [[pantheism]] (that God and the universe are identical), and ancient pagan and gnostic-manichean [[Dualistic cosmology|dualism]] (where God is not responsible for the entire created world, since mere "matter" is evil not good, see Ott, page 79).

The First Vatican Council also upholds the ability of reason to know God from his [[Genesis creation myth|creation]]:

{{blockquote|1. The same Holy mother Church holds and teaches that God, the source and end of all things, can be known with certainty from the consideration of created things, by the natural power of human reason: ever since the creation of the world, his invisible nature has been clearly perceived in the things that have been made.|Chapter 2, ''On Revelation''; cf. ''Romans'' 1:19–20; and ''Wisdom'' chapter 13}}

==Popes Leo XIII and Pius X==
[[File:J. Bosch The Garden of Earthly Delights (detail 3).jpg|thumb|left|God with [[Adam and Eve]] in ''[[The Garden of Earthly Delights]]'' by [[Hieronymus Bosch]].]]
[[Pope Leo XIII]], who succeeded in 1878, was known to advocate a more open approach to science, but also to be frustrated by opposition to this within the Vatican and leading church circles, "lamenting on a number of occasions, and not in a particularly private way, the repressive attitudes to scholars exhibited by people around him, and among those he clearly included members of ''[[La Civiltà Cattolica]]'' college of writers".  On one occasion there was "quite a scene when the Pope energetically refused to have the writings of [[Maurice Le Sage d'Hauteroche d'Hulst|Mons. D'Hulst of Paris]] put on the [[Index Librorum Prohibitorum|Index of Forbidden Books]]".<ref>Brundell, 83-84, quoted in turn</ref>

''[[Providentissimus Deus]]'', "On the Study of Holy [[Scripture]]", was an [[encyclical]] issued by Leo XIII on 18 November 1893 on the interpretation of Scripture. It was intended to address the issues arising from both the "[[higher criticism]]" and new scientific theories, and their relation with Scripture. Nothing specific concerning evolution was said, and initially both those in favour and against evolution found things to encourage them in the text; however a more conservative interpretation came to be dominant, and the influence of the conservative [[Jesuit]] Cardinal [[Camillo Mazzella]] (with whom Leo had argued over Mons. D'Hulst) detected. Leo stressed the unstable and changing nature of scientific theory, and criticised the "thirst for novelty and the unrestrained freedom of thought" of the age, but accepted that the apparent literal sense of the Bible might not always be correct. In biblical interpretation, Catholic scholars should not "depart from the literal and obvious sense, except only where reason makes it untenable or necessity requires". Leo stressed that both theologians and scientists should confine themselves to their own disciplines as much as possible.<ref>O'Leary, 71</ref>

An earlier encyclical of Leo's on marriage, ''[[Arcanum (encyclical)|Arcanum]] Divinae Sapientiae'' (1880), had described in passing the ''Genesis'' account of the creation of [[Eve]] from [[Adam]]'s side as "what is to all known, and cannot be doubted by any."<ref>[https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/leo_xiii/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_10021880_arcanum_en.html Arcanum Divinae Sapientiae] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090622095840/https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/leo_xiii/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_10021880_arcanum_en.html |date=June 22, 2009 }}, [[Encyclical]], Vatican website. Quotation from s.5. Cited by in [http://www.rtforum.org/lt/lt97.html Did women evolve from beasts], [[Brian Harrison (theologian)|Harrison , Brian W.]] ''Living Tradition''.</ref>

The [[Pontifical Biblical Commission]] issued a decree ratified by [[Pope Pius X]] on June 30, 1909, that stated that the literal historical meaning of the first chapters of Genesis could not be doubted in regard to "the creation of all things by God at the beginning of time; the special creation of man; the formation of the first woman from the first man; the unity of the human race". As in 1860, "special creation" was only referred to in respect of the human species.<ref name=Stenson>[http://www.ewtn.com/library/HUMANITY/EVOLUTN.TXT ''Evolution: A Catholic Perspective''], James B. Stenson, Catholic Position Papers, Series A, Number 116, March, 1984, Japan Edition, Seido Foundation for the Advancement of Education, 12-6 Funado-Cho, Ashiya-Shi Japan.</ref>

==Pope Pius XII==
[[Pope Pius XII]]'s [[encyclical]] of 1950, ''[[Humani generis]]'', was the first encyclical to specifically refer to evolution and took up a neutral position, again concentrating on human evolution:

{{blockquote|The Church does not forbid that ... research and discussions, on the part of men experienced in both fields, take place with regard to the doctrine of evolution, in as far as it inquires into the origin of the human body as coming from pre-existent and living matter.<ref>Pius XII, [https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xii_enc_12081950_humani-generis_en.html encyclical ''Humani generis''] 36 {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120419021937/https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xii_enc_12081950_humani-generis_en.html |date=April 19, 2012 }}</ref>}}

Pope Pius XII's teaching can be summarized as follows:
* The question of the origin of man's body from pre-existing and living matter is a legitimate matter of inquiry for [[natural science]]. Catholics are free to form their own opinions, but they should do so cautiously; they should not confuse [[fact]] with [[conjecture]], and they should respect the Church's right to define matters touching on [[Revelation]].
* Catholics must believe, however, that humans have souls created immediately by God. Since the soul is a spiritual substance it is not brought into being through transformation of matter, but directly by God, whence the special uniqueness of each person.
* All men have descended from an individual, [[Adam]], who has transmitted original sin to all mankind. Catholics may not, therefore, believe in "polygenism", the [[scientific hypothesis]] that mankind descended from a group of original humans (that there were many Adams and Eves).

Some theologians believe Pius XII explicitly excludes belief in [[polygenism]] as licit. Another interpretation might be this: As we have nowadays in fact models of thinking of ''how'' to reconcile polygenism with the original sin, it need not be condemned. The relevant sentence is this:

{{blockquote|Now it is in no way apparent how such an opinion (polygenism) can be reconciled with that which the sources of revealed truth and the documents of the Teaching Authority of the Church propose with regard to original sin, which proceeds from a sin actually committed by an individual Adam and which, through generation, is passed on to all and is in everyone as his own.|Pius XII, ''Humani generis'', 37 and footnote refers to ''Romans'' 5:12–19; Council of Trent, Session V, Canons 1–4}}

==Pope John Paul II==
[[File:John Paul II Medal of Freedom 2004.jpg|thumb|"...&nbsp;new findings lead us toward the recognition of evolution as more than a [[hypothesis]]."<br>— John Paul II, 1996<ref name=JPII/>]]
In an October 22, 1996, address to the [[Pontifical Academy of Sciences]], [[Pope John Paul II]] updated the Church's position to accept evolution of the human body:

{{blockquote|In his encyclical ''Humani generis'' (1950), my predecessor Pius XII has already affirmed that there is no conflict between evolution and the doctrine of the faith regarding man and his vocation, provided that we do not lose sight of certain fixed points. ... Today, more than a half-century after the appearance of that encyclical, some new findings lead us toward the recognition of evolution as more than a hypothesis. In fact it is remarkable that this theory has had progressively greater influence on the spirit of researchers, following a series of discoveries in different scholarly disciplines. The convergence in the results of these independent studies—which was neither planned nor sought—constitutes in itself a significant argument in favor of the theory.<ref name=JPII>John Paul II, [https://humanorigins.si.edu/sites/default/files/MESSAGE%20TO%20THE%20PONTIFICAL%20ACADEMY%20OF%20SCIENCES%20%28Pope%20John%20Paul%20II%29.pdf Message to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences: On Evolution]; the speech was made in French - for a dispute over whether the correct English translation of "''la theorie de l'evolution plus qu'une hypothese''" is "more than a hypothesis" or "more than one hypothesis", see [[Eugenie Scott]],  [http://ncse.com/religion/creationists-popes-statement NCSE online version] of ''Creationists and the Pope's Statement'', which originally appeared in ''The Quarterly Review of Biology'', 72.4, December 1997</ref>}}

In the same address, Pope John Paul II rejected any theory of evolution that provides a materialistic explanation for the human [[Soul (spirit)|soul]]:

{{blockquote|Theories of evolution which, because of the philosophies which inspire them, regard the spirit either as [[emergence|emerging]] from the forces of living matter, or as a simple epiphenomenon of that matter, are incompatible with the truth about man.}}

==Pope Benedict XVI==
Statements by Cardinal [[Christoph Schönborn]], a close colleague of Benedict XVI, especially a piece in ''[[The New York Times]]'' on July 7, 2005,<ref>Cardinal Christoph Schönborn, "[http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/science/sc0060.html Finding Design in Nature]", published in ''The New York Times'', July 7, 2005.</ref> appeared to support [[Intelligent Design]], giving rise to speculation about a new direction in the Church's stance on the compatibility between evolution and Catholic doctrine; many of Schönborn's complaints about Darwinian evolution echoed pronouncements originating from the [[Discovery Institute]], an interdenominational Christian [[think tank]].<ref name="Matt Young, Taner Edis">{{cite book|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=hYLKdtlVeQgC&q=archbishop+of+Vienna+intelligent+design&pg=PR7|author1=Matt Young|author2=Taner Edis|author-link2=Taner Edis|title=Why Intelligent Design Fails: A Scientific Critique of the New Creationism|year=2006|publisher=Rutgers, The State University|isbn=9780813538723|quote=An influential Roman Catholic cardinal, Cristoph Schonborn, the archbishop of Vienna, appeared to retreat from John Paul II's support for evolution and wrote in ''The New York Times'' that descent with modification is a fact, but evolution in the sense of "an unguided, unplanned process of random variation and natural selection" is false. Many of Schonborn's complaints about Darwinian evolution echoed pronouncements originating from the Discovery Institute, the right-wing American think tank that plays a central role in the ID movement (and whose public relations firm submitted Schonborn's article to the Times).|access-date=2010-12-02}}</ref><ref name="Parliamentary Assembly">{{cite book|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=imUrkSP_5sUC&q=archbishop+of+Vienna+intelligent+design&pg=PA66|title=Parliamentary Assembly, Working Papers: 2007 Ordinary Session|date=30 June 2008|publisher=Council of Europe Publishing|isbn=9789287163684|quote=Christoph Schonborn, the Archbishop of Vienna, published an article in ''The New York Times'' stating that the declarations made by Pope John Paul II could not be interpreted as recognising evolution. At the same time, he repeated arguments put forward by the supporters of the intelligent design ideas. |access-date=2010-12-02}}</ref> However, Cardinal Schönborn's book ''Chance or Purpose'' (2007, originally in German) accepted with certain qualifications the "scientific theory of evolution", but attacked "evolutionism as an ideology", which he said sought to displace religious teaching over a wide range of issues.<ref>[http://www.rtforum.org/lt/lt135.html Review] by John F. McCarthy, ''Living Tradition''. Quotes p. 150 of the English edition.</ref> Nonetheless, in the mid-1980s, Prefect of the [[Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith|Sacred Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith]] [[Pope Benedict XVI|Joseph Ratzinger]] wrote a defense of the doctrine of creation against Catholics who stressed the sufficiency of "selection and mutation."<ref name="Ronald L. Numbers">{{cite book|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=GQ3TI5njXfIC&q=archbishop+of+Vienna+intelligent+design&pg=PA395|author=Ronald L. Numbers|title=The creationists: from scientific creationism to intelligent design|year=2006|publisher=[[Random House]]|isbn=9780674023390|quote=Miffed by Krauss's comments, officers at the Discovery Institute arranged for the cardinal archbishop of Vienna, Cristoph Sconborn (b. 1945), to write an op-ed piece for the Times dismissing the late pope's statement as 'rather vague and unimportant' and denying the truth of 'evolution in the neo-Darwinian sense—an unguided, unplanned process of random variation and natural selection.' The cardinal, it seems, had received the backing of the new pope, Benedict XVI, the former Joseph Ratzinger (b. 1927), who in the mid-1980s, while serving as prefect of the Sacred Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith, successor to the notorious Inquisition, had written a defense of the doctrine of creation against Catholics who stressed the sufficiency of 'selection and mutation.' Humans, he insisted, are 'not the products of chance and error,' and 'the universe is not the product of darkness and unreason. It comes from intelligence, freedom, and from the beauty that is identical with love.' Recent discoveries in microbiology and biochemistry, he was happy to say, had revealed 'reasonable design.'|access-date=2010-12-02}}</ref> Humans, Ratzinger writes, are "not the products of chance and error,"<ref name="Ronald L. Numbers"/> and "the universe is not the product of darkness and unreason; it comes from intelligence, freedom, and from the beauty that is identical with love."<ref name="Ronald L. Numbers"/>

The Church has deferred to scientists on matters such as the [[age of the earth]] and the authenticity of the [[fossil record]]. Papal pronouncements, along with commentaries by cardinals, have accepted the findings of scientists on the [[gradualism|gradual]] appearance of life. In fact, the [[International Theological Commission]] in a July 2004 statement endorsed by Cardinal Ratzinger, then president of the Commission and head of the [[Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith]], includes this paragraph:

{{quotation|According to the widely accepted scientific account, the universe erupted 15 billion years ago in an explosion called the '[[Big Bang]]' and has been expanding and cooling ever since. Later there gradually emerged the conditions necessary for the formation of [[atom]]s, still later the condensation of galaxies and stars, and about 10 billion years later the formation of [[planet]]s. In our own [[Solar System|solar system]] and on [[earth]] (formed about 4.5 billion years ago), the conditions have been favorable to the emergence of [[life]]. While there is little consensus among scientists about how the [[origin of life|origin]] of this first microscopic life is to be explained, there is general agreement among them that the first organism dwelt on this planet about 3.5–4 billion years ago. Since it has been demonstrated that all living organisms on earth are [[Common descent|genetically related]], it is virtually certain that all living organisms have descended from this first organism. Converging evidence from many studies in the physical and biological sciences furnishes mounting support for some theory of evolution to account for the development and diversification of life on earth, while controversy continues over the pace and mechanisms of evolution.<ref name=communion>International Theological Commission (July 2004) ''Communion and Stewardship: Human Persons Created in the Image of God'', plenary sessions held in Rome 2000–2002,  §63.{{cite web|url=https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/cti_documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20040723_communion-stewardship_en.html |title=Communion and Stewardship: Human Persons Created in the Image of God |access-date=2014-07-22 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140621050711/https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/cti_documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20040723_communion-stewardship_en.html |archive-date=2014-06-21 }}</ref>}}

The Church's stance is that any such gradual appearance must have been guided in some way by God, but the Church has thus far declined to define in what way that may be. Commentators tend to interpret the Church's position in the way most favorable to their own arguments. The ITC statement includes these paragraphs on evolution, the providence of God, and "intelligent design":

{{quotation|In freely willing to create and conserve the [[universe]], God wills to activate and to sustain in act all those secondary causes whose activity contributes to the unfolding of the natural order which he intends to produce. Through the activity of natural causes, God causes to arise those conditions required for the emergence and support of living organisms, and, furthermore, for their reproduction and differentiation. Although there is scientific debate about the degree of purposiveness or [[Teleology|design]] operative and empirically observable in these developments, they have de facto favored the emergence and flourishing of life. Catholic theologians can see in such reasoning support for the affirmation entailed by faith in divine creation and divine providence. In the providential design of creation, the triune God intended not only to make a place for human beings in the universe but also, and ultimately, to make room for them in his own trinitarian life. Furthermore, operating as real, though secondary causes, human beings contribute to the reshaping and transformation of the universe.

A growing body of scientific critics of [[neo-Darwinism]] point to evidence of design (e.g., biological structures that exhibit [[specified complexity]]) that, in their view, cannot be explained in terms of a purely contingent process and that neo-Darwinians have ignored or misinterpreted. The nub of this currently lively disagreement involves scientific observation and generalization concerning whether the available data support inferences of design or chance, and cannot be settled by theology. But it is important to note that, according to the Catholic understanding of divine causality, true contingency in the created order is not incompatible with a purposeful divine providence. Divine causality and created causality radically differ in kind and not only in degree. Thus, even the outcome of a truly contingent natural process can nonetheless fall within God's providential plan for creation.<ref name=communion/>}}

In addition, while he was the Vatican's chief astronomer, Fr. [[George Coyne]] issued a statement on 18 November 2005 saying that "Intelligent design isn't science even though it pretends to be. If you want to teach it in schools, intelligent design should be taught when religion or cultural history is taught, not science." Cardinal [[Paul Poupard]] added that "the [[Faithful (Catholicism)|faithful]] have the obligation to listen to that which secular modern science has to offer, just as we ask that knowledge of the faith be taken in consideration as an expert voice in humanity." He also warned of the permanent lesson we have learned from the [[Galileo affair]], and that "we also know the dangers of a religion that severs its links with reason and becomes prey to [[fundamentalism]]." Fiorenzo Facchini, professor of [[evolutionary biology]] at the [[University of Bologna]], called intelligent design unscientific, and wrote in the January 16–17, 2006 edition ''L'Osservatore Romano'': "But it is not correct from a [[methodological naturalism|methodological]] point of view to stray from the field of science while pretending to do science. ...It only creates confusion between the scientific plane and those that are philosophical or religious." [[Kenneth R. Miller]] is another prominent Catholic scientist widely known for opposing Young Earth Creationism and Intelligent Design. He writes, concerning Emeritus pope Benedict XVI, that "The Holy Father's concerns are not with evolution per se, but with how evolution is to be understood in our modern world. Biological evolution fits neatly into a traditional Catholic understanding of how contingent natural processes can be seen as part of God's plan ...a careful reading suggests that the new pope will give quarter neither to the enemies of spirituality nor the enemies of evolutionary science. And that's exactly as it should be."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.hds.harvard.edu/news-events/harvard-divinity-bulletin/articles/darwins-pope |title=Kenneth R. Miller - Darwin's Pope? &#124; Harvard Divinity Bulletin |access-date=2014-01-20 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140202144951/http://www.hds.harvard.edu/news-events/harvard-divinity-bulletin/articles/darwins-pope |archive-date=2014-02-02 }}</ref>

In a commentary on [[Book of Genesis|Genesis]] authored as Cardinal Ratzinger titled ''In the Beginning...'' Benedict XVI spoke of "the inner unity of creation and evolution and of faith and reason" and that these two realms of knowledge are [[Religion and science|complementary, not contradictory]]:

{{quotation|We cannot say: creation or evolution, inasmuch as these two things respond to two different realities. The story of the dust of the earth and the breath of God, which we just heard, does not in fact explain how human persons come to be but rather what they are. It explains their inmost origin and casts light on the project that they are. And, vice versa, the theory of evolution seeks to understand and describe biological developments. But in so doing it cannot explain where the 'project' of human persons comes from, nor their inner origin, nor their particular nature. To that extent we are faced here with two complementary—rather than mutually exclusive—realities.|Cardinal Ratzinger, ''In the Beginning: A Catholic Understanding of the Story of Creation and the Fall'' (Eerdmans, 1995), p. 50.|}}

In a book released in 2008, his comments prior to becoming Pope were recorded as:
{{quotation|The clay became man at the moment in which a being for the first time was capable of forming, however dimly, the thought of "God". The first Thou that—however stammeringly—was said by human lips to God marks the moment in which the spirit arose in the world. Here the Rubicon of anthropogenesis was crossed. For it is not the use of weapons or fire, not new methods of cruelty or of useful activity, that constitute man, but rather his ability to be immediately in relation to God. This holds fast to the doctrine of the special creation of man ... herein ... lies the reason why the moment of anthropogenesis cannot possibly be determined by paleontology: anthropogenesis is the rise of the spirit, which cannot be excavated with a shovel. The theory of evolution does not invalidate the faith, nor does it corroborate it. But it does challenge the faith to understand itself more profoundly and thus to help man to understand himself and to become increasingly what he is: the being who is supposed to say Thou to God in eternity.|Joseph Ratzinger<ref>''Creation and Evolution: A Conference With Pope Benedict XVI in Castel Gandolfo'', S.D.S. Stephan Horn (ed), pp. 15–16</ref>}}

On September 2–3, 2006 at [[Castel Gandolfo]], Pope Benedict XVI conducted a seminar examining the theory of evolution and its impact on Catholicism's teaching of Creation. The seminar is the latest edition of the annual "Schülerkreis" or student circle, a meeting Benedict has held with his former [[Ph.D.]] students since the 1970s.<ref>[http://www.beliefnet.com/story/197/story_19764_1.html Pope to Dissect Evolution With Former Students] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060816061101/http://www.beliefnet.com/story/197/story_19764_1.html |date=2006-08-16 }}, Stacy Meichtry, Beliefnet</ref><ref>[http://ncrcafe.org/node/435 Benedict's Schulerkreis] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927213823/http://ncrcafe.org/node/435 |date=2007-09-27 }}, John L. Allen Jr, ''[[National Catholic Reporter]]'' Blog, Sep 8, 2006</ref> The essays presented by his former students, including natural scientists and theologians, were published in 2007 under the title ''Creation and Evolution'' (in German, ''Schöpfung und Evolution''). In Pope Benedict's own contribution he states that "the question is not to either make a decision for a creationism that fundamentally excludes science, or for an evolutionary theory that covers over its own gaps and does not want to see the questions that reach beyond the methodological possibilities of natural science", and that "I find it important to underline that the theory of evolution implies questions that must be assigned to philosophy and which themselves lead beyond the realms of science."

In July 2007 at a meeting with clergy Pope Benedict XVI noted that the conflict between "creationism" and evolution (as a finding of science) is "absurd:" <ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2007/july/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20070724_clero-cadore_en.html |title=Meeting Of The Holy Father Benedict XVI With The Clergy Of The Dioceses Of Belluno-Feltre And Treviso |publisher=Vatican.va |date=2007-07-24 |access-date=2013-02-11}}</ref>
{{quotation|Currently, I see in Germany, but also in the United States, a somewhat fierce debate raging between so-called "creationism" and evolutionism, presented as though they were mutually exclusive alternatives: those who believe in the Creator would not be able to conceive of evolution, and those who instead support evolution would have to exclude God.  This antithesis is absurd because, on the one hand, there are so many scientific proofs in favour of evolution which appears to be a reality we can see and which enriches our knowledge of life and being as such.  But on the other, the doctrine of evolution does not answer every query, especially the great philosophical question: where does everything come from? And how did everything start which ultimately led to man? I believe this is of the utmost importance.|}}

In commenting on statements by his predecessor, he writes "it is also true that the theory of evolution is not a complete, scientifically proven theory." Though commenting that experiments in a controlled environment were limited as "we cannot haul 10,000 generations into the laboratory", he does ''not'' endorse [[Young Earth Creationism]] or [[intelligent design]]. He defends [[theistic evolution]], the reconciliation between science and religion already held by Catholics. In discussing evolution, he writes that "The process itself is rational despite the mistakes and confusion as it goes through a narrow corridor choosing a few positive [[mutation]]s and using low probability.... This ... inevitably leads to a question that goes beyond science.... Where did this rationality come from?" to which he answers that it comes from the "creative reason" of God.<ref>[http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/world/20070411-0300-pope-evolution-.html Pope says science too narrow to explain creation], Tom Heneghan, ''[[San Diego Union-Tribune]]'', April 11, 2007</ref><ref>[http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/evolution-not-completely-provable-pope/2007/04/11/1175971179873.html Evolution not completely provable: Pope], [[Sydney Morning Herald]], April 11, 2007</ref><ref>[https://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/2007-04-11-pope-evolution-creation_N.htm Pope praises science but stresses evolution not proven], [[USA Today]], 4/12/2007</ref>

The 150th anniversary of the publication of the ''Origin of Species'' saw two major conferences on evolution in Rome: a five-day plenary session of the [[Pontifical Academy of Sciences]] in October/November 2008 on ''Scientific Insights Into the Evolution of the Universe and of Life''<ref>{{Citation | editor-last = Arber | editor-first = Werner | editor2-last = Cabibbo | editor2-first = Nicola | editor3-last = Sánchez Sorondo | editor3-first = Marcelo | title = Scientific Insights Into the Evolution of the Universe and of Life | series = Pontificiae Academiae Scientiarum Acta | volume = 20 | year = 2009 | place = Vatican City | publisher = Ex Aedibus Academicis in Civitate Vaticana | isbn = 9788877610973 | url = http://www.casinapioiv.va/content/accademia/en/publications/acta/evolution.html }}</ref> and another five-day conference on ''[[Biological Evolution: Facts and Theories]]'', held in March 2009 at the [[Pontifical Gregorian University]].<ref>{{Citation | editor-last = Auletta | editor-first = Gennaro | editor2-last = LeClerc | editor2-first = Marc | editor3-last = Martinez | editor3-first = Rafael A. | title = Biological Evolution: Facts and Theories | series = Analecta Gregoriana | volume =  312 | year = 2011 | place = Rome | publisher = Gregorian & Biblical Press | isbn = 978-88-7839-180-2 }}</ref>  These meetings generally confirmed the lack of conflict between evolutionary theory and Catholic theology, and the rejection of Intelligent Design by Catholic scholars.<ref>Richard Owen: ''[https://www.thetimes.com/article/vatican-says-evolution-does-not-prove-the-non-existence-of-god-2tgcs99qpml Vatican says Evolution does not prove the non-existence of God].'' In: ''[[The Times]].'' March 6, 2009; accessed 19 January 2025</ref>

On the evening of his death on December 31, 2022, the [[Holy See]] published the spiritual testament of Benedict XVI, which was written on August 29, 2006. 
In regards to natural sciences, he wrote:<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/elezione/documents/testamento-spirituale-bxvi.html|title=Spiritual Testament of Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI &#124; BENEDICT XVI|website=www.vatican.va}}</ref> 
{{quotation| What I said earlier of my compatriots, I now say to all who were entrusted to my service in the Church: Stand firm in the faith! Do not be confused! Often it seems as if science - on the one hand, the natural sciences; on the other, historical research (especially the exegesis of the Holy Scriptures) - has irrefutable insights to offer that are contrary to the Catholic faith. I have witnessed from times long past the changes in natural science and have seen how apparent certainties against the faith vanished, proving themselves not to be science but philosophical interpretations only apparently belonging to science - just as, moreover, it is in dialogue with the natural sciences that faith has learned to understand the limits of the scope of its affirmations and thus its own specificity.|}}

==Pope Francis==
On October 27, 2014, [[Pope Francis]] issued a statement at the Pontifical Academy of Sciences that "Evolution in nature is not inconsistent with the notion of creation," warning against thinking of God's act of creation as "God [being] a magician, with a magic wand able to do everything."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2014/10/28/359564982/pope-says-god-not-a-magician-with-a-magic-wand|title=Pope Says God Not 'A Magician, With A Magic Wand'|date=28 October 2014|work=NPR.org}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cnet.com/news/pope-says-evolution-doesnt-mean-theres-no-god/|title=Pope says evolution doesn't mean there's no God|date=27 October 2014|publisher=CBS Interactive|work=CNET}}</ref><ref>[https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2014/10/28/pope-francis-backs-theory-of-evolution-says-god-is-no-wizard/ Pope Francis backs theory of evolution, says God is no wizard], by Ishaan Tharoor, 28 October 2014</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.religionnews.com/2014/10/27/pope-francis-evolution-inconsistent-notion-creation/|title=Pope Francis: 'Evolution ... is not inconsistent with the notion of creation' - Religion News Service|work=Religion News Service|date=27 October 2014}}</ref>

The Pope also expressed in the same statement the view that scientific explanations such as the Big Bang and evolution in fact require God's creation:

{{quotation|[God] created beings and allowed them to develop according to the internal laws that he gave to each one, so that they were able to develop and to arrive at their fullness of being. He gave autonomy to the beings of the universe at the same time at which he assured them of his continuous presence, giving being to every reality. And so creation continued for centuries and centuries, millennia and millennia, until it became what we know today, precisely because God is not a [[demiurge]] or a magician, but the creator who gives being to all things. ...The Big Bang, which nowadays is posited as the origin of the world, does not contradict the divine act of creating, but rather requires it. The evolution of nature does not contrast with the notion of creation, as evolution presupposes the creation of beings that evolve.<ref>{{cite web | title=Francis inaugurates bust of Benedict, emphasizes unity of faith, science | url=https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/30810/francis-inaugurates-bust-of-benedict-emphasizes-unity-of-faith-science | publisher=cna | date=27 October 2014 | access-date=3 November 2014}}</ref>|sign=|source=}}

"God is not... a magician, but the Creator who brought everything to life,” Francis said. “Evolution in nature is not inconsistent with the notion of creation, because evolution requires the creation of beings that evolve.”

==Catholic teaching and evolution==

The ''[[Catechism of the Catholic Church]]'' (1994, revised 1997) on faith, evolution and science states:
{{quotation|159. Faith and science: "...&nbsp;methodical research in all branches of knowledge, provided it is carried out in a truly scientific manner and does not override moral laws, can never conflict with the faith, because the things of the world and the things of faith derive from the same God. The humble and persevering investigator of the secrets of nature is being led, as it were, by the hand of God in spite of himself, for it is God, the conserver of all things, who made them what they are."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.vatican.va/content/catechism/en/part_one/section_one/chapter_three/article_1/iii_the_characteristics_of_faith.index.html|title=Part One Section One I Believe - We Believe Chapter Three Man's Response To God Article 1 I Believe III. The Characteristics Of Faith|website=www.vatican.va}}</ref>

283. The question about the origins of the world and of man has been the object of many scientific studies which have splendidly enriched our knowledge of the age and dimensions of the cosmos, the development of life-forms and the appearance of man. These discoveries invite us to even greater admiration for the greatness of the Creator, prompting us to give him thanks for all his works and for the understanding and wisdom he gives to scholars and researchers...<ref name="questionaboutorigins">{{cite web | url=https://www.vatican.va/content/catechism/en/part_one/section_two/chapter_one/article_1/paragraph_4_the_creator.html | title=Part One Section Two I. The Creeds Chapter One I Believe in God the Father Article 1 I Believe in God the Father Almighty, Creator of Heaven and Earth Paragraph 4. The Creator }}</ref>

284. The great interest accorded to these studies is strongly stimulated by a question of another order, which goes beyond the proper domain of the natural sciences. It is not only a question of knowing when and how the universe arose physically, or when man appeared, but rather of discovering the meaning of such an origin...<ref name="questionaboutorigins"/>}}

Despite these general sections on scientific discussion of the origins of the world and of man, the ''Catechism'' does not explicitly discuss the theory of evolution in its treatment of human origins.<ref name= "O'Sullivan 2016">{{ Citation | last = O'Sullivan | first = James P. | date = 2016 | title = Catholics Re-examining Original Sin in light of Evolutionary Science: The State of the Question | journal = [[New Blackfriars]] | volume = 99 | issue = 1083 | pages = 653–674 | issn = 1741-2005 | doi = 10.1111/nbfr.12234 }}</ref>  Paragraph 283 has been noted as making a positive comment regarding the theory of evolution, with the clarification that "many scientific studies" that have enriched knowledge of "the development of life-forms and the appearance of man" refers to mainstream science and not to "[[creation science]]".<ref>{{Cite news  | last =Akin  | first =Jimmy  | title =Evolution and the Magisterium  | newspaper =This Rock  | date =January 2004  | url =http://www.catholic.com/thisrock/2004/0401bt.asp  | access-date =2007-08-14  | url-status =dead  | archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20070804102139/http://www.catholic.com/thisrock/2004/0401bt.asp  | archive-date =2007-08-04  }}</ref> {{Failed verification|date=January 2024}} 

Concerning the doctrine on creation, Ludwig Ott in his ''Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma'' identifies the following points as essential beliefs of the Catholic faith ("De Fide"):<ref>''Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma'' (originally published in 1952 in German), Ludwig Ott, these specific De Fide statements found in Ott on "The Divine Act of Creation", pages 79–91. The various Councils ([[Fourth Lateran Council|Lateran IV]], [[First Vatican Council|Vatican I]], [[Council of Florence|Florence]], and others), the traditional statements of the Saints, Doctors, Fathers, and Scriptures are cited by Ott to document the Catholic [[dogma]] that God is ultimately the Creator of all things however he chose to do the creating (Genesis 1; Colossians 1:15ff; Hebrews 3; Psalm 19).</ref>
* All that exists outside God was, in its whole substance, produced out of nothing by God.
* God was moved by His Goodness to create the world.
* The world was created for the Glorification of God.
* The Three Divine Persons are one single, common Principle of the Creation.
* God created the world free from exterior compulsion and inner necessity.
* God has created a good world.
* The world had a beginning in time.
* God alone created the world.
* God keeps all created things in existence.
* God, through His Providence, protects and guides all that He has created.

Some Catholic theologians, among them [[Pierre Teilhard de Chardin]], [[Piet Schoonenberg]], and [[Karl Rahner]], have discussed the problem of how evolutionary theory relates to the doctrine of original sin.  They generally question the idea of a human fall from an original state of perfection and a common theme among them, most explicitly stated by Rahner, is to see Adam's sin as the sin of the entire human community, which provides a resolution of the problem of polygenism.<ref name= "O'Sullivan 2016"/>

== Evolution in Catholic schools ==
{{globalize|date=March 2018}}
[[File:Dobzhansky Evolution Notre Dame.jpg|thumb| Mosaic medallion in the floor of the main hall of the Jordan Hall of Science, [[University of Notre Dame]] (a Catholic institution). Bears the quotation from Theodosius Dobzhansky (1900-1975), "[[Nothing in Biology makes sense except in the light of evolution]]."]]

Catholic schools in the United States and other countries teach evolution as part of their science curriculum. They teach that evolution occurs and the modern evolutionary synthesis, which is the scientific theory that explains how evolution proceeds. This is the same evolution curriculum that secular schools teach. Bishop [[Francis X. DiLorenzo]] of [[Richmond, Virginia|Richmond]], chair of the Committee on Science and Human Values, wrote in a letter sent to all U.S. bishops in December 2004: "Catholic schools should continue teaching evolution as a scientific theory backed by convincing evidence. At the same time, Catholic parents whose children are in public schools should ensure that their children are also receiving appropriate catechesis at home and in the parish on God as Creator. Students should be able to leave their biology classes, and their courses in religious instruction, with an integrated understanding of the means God chose to make us who we are."<ref>{{ Citation | last = Guntzel | first = Jeff Severns | date = March 25, 2005 | title = Catholic schools steer clear of anti-evolution bias | newspaper = [[National Catholic Reporter]] | url = http://natcath.org/NCR_Online/archives2/2005a/032505/032505ssn.htm }}</ref>

A survey of principals and teachers of science and of religion at Catholic high schools in the United States indicates some attitudes toward the teaching of evolution and the results of that teaching.  86% of principals reported their schools took an integrated approach to science and religion, in which "evolution, the [[Big Bang]], and the [[Book of Genesis]]" were addressed together in classes.  On specific topics, 95% of science teachers and 79% of religion teachers agreed that "evolution by natural selection" explains "the diversity of life on earth".  Only 21% of science teachers and 32% of religion teachers believed that "Adam and Eve were real historical people".  A companion survey of Catholic adults found that 65% of those who had attended a Catholic high school believed in evolution compared to 53% of those who did not attend.<ref>{{ Citation | last1 = Emurayeveya | first1 = Florence | last2 = Gray | first2 = Mark M. | date = Spring 2018 | title = Science and Religion in Catholic High Schools | type = CARA Special Report | publisher = [[Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate]] | place = Washington, DC | url = https://cara.georgetown.edu/Publications/ScienceCatholicHS2018.pdf | access-date = 23 March 2018 }}</ref>

==Unofficial Catholic organizations==
{{See also|List of Catholic creationist organisations}}
There have been several organizations composed of [[Catholic laity]] and clergy which have advocated positions both supporting evolution and opposed to evolution, as well as individual figures such as [[Bruce Chapman]]. For example:
* [http://www.kolbecenter.org/ The Kolbe Center for the Study of Creation] operates out of [[Mt. Jackson, Virginia]], and is a Catholic lay apostolate promoting creationism.<ref>[http://www.kolbecenter.org/ ''Kolbe Center for the Study of Creation: Defending Genesis from a Traditional Catholic Perspective''] official website.</ref>
* The "Faith Movement"<ref>[http://www.faith.org.uk/] official website.</ref> was founded by Catholic priests Fr. Edward Holloway and Fr. Roger Nesbitt in [[Surrey, England]],<ref>''Catholicism: a New Synthesis'', Edward Holloway, 1969.</ref> and "argues from Evolution as a fact, that the whole process would be impossible without the existence of the Supreme Mind we call God."<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20080131144906/http://www.theotokos.org.uk/pages/creation/daylight/faith2.html ''Theistic Evolution and the Mystery of FAITH (cont'd)''], Anthony Nevard, Theotokos Catholic Books website; Creation/Evolution Section.</ref>
* The [[Daylight Origins Society]] was founded in 1971 by [[John G. Campbell]] (d.1983) as the Counter Evolution Group. Its goal is "to inform Catholics and others of the scientific evidence supporting Special Creation as opposed to Evolution, and that the true discoveries of Science are in conformity with Catholic doctrines." It publishes the "Daylight" newsletter.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20080218035823/http://www.theotokos.org.uk/pages/creation/daylight/daylight.html ''Daylight Origins Society: Creation Science for Catholics''] official home page.</ref>
* The [[Center for Science and Culture]] of the [[Discovery Institute]] was founded, in part, by Catholic biochemist and [[intelligent design]] advocate [[Michael Behe]], who is currently a senior fellow at the Center.<ref name="William A. Dembski">{{cite book|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=SU7VZD6ts20C&q=Michael+Behe+Center+for+Science+and+Culture&pg=PA349|author=William A. Dembski|title=Darwin's nemesis: Phillip Johnson and the intelligent design movement|date=22 February 2006|publisher=[[InterVarsity Press]]|isbn=9780830828364|quote=Michael J. Behe is professor of biological sciences at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania.... He is senior fellow with Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture.|access-date=2010-12-02}}</ref><ref name="Andrew J. Petto, Laurie R. Godfrey">{{cite book|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=SCDB7hhLpwMC&q=Michael+Behe+Center+for+Science+and+Culture&pg=PA117|author=Andrew J. Petto, Laurie R. Godfrey|title=Scientists confront intelligent design and creationism|year=2007|publisher=[[W. W. Norton & Company]]|isbn=9780393050905|quote=Senior fellows at the CSC include mathematician David Berlinski, theological and molecular biologist Jonathan Wells, biophysicist Michael Behe, mathematician William Dembski, philosopher Paul Nelson, and others.|access-date=2010-12-02}}</ref>

Fr. [[Pierre Teilhard de Chardin]], S.J., offers Catholics insight into the relation between Catholic faith and evolution theory. Despite occasional objections to aspects of his thought, Teilhard was never condemned by the magisterial church.<ref>[http://www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/arch/dechardin.txt ''Warning Considering the Writings of Father Teilhard de Chardin''] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071214051625/http://www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/arch/dechardin.txt |date=December 14, 2007 }}, Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office, June 30, 1962.</ref><ref>[http://www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/arch/dechardin.txt Communiqué of the Press Office of the Holy See] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071214051625/http://www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/arch/dechardin.txt |date=December 14, 2007 }}, English edition of L'Osservatore Romano, July 20, 1981.</ref><ref>[http://www.theotokos.org.uk/pages/creation/misc/teilhard.html ''Letter about Teilhard de Chardin''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071210060821/http://www.theotokos.org.uk/pages/creation/misc/teilhard.html |date=2007-12-10 }}, Etienne Gilson writing to Cardinal De Lubac, in ''Teilhard de Chardin: False Prophet'', Dietrich von Hildebrand, Chicago: Franciscan Herald Press, 1968.</ref>

==See also==
{{Portal|Catholicism}}
* [[Creation and evolution in public education]]
* [[Catholic Church and science]]
* [[Hindu views on evolution]]
* [[Islamic views on evolution]]
* [[Jainism and non-creationism]]
* [[Jewish views on evolution]]
* [[Relationship between religion and science]]
* [[Erich Wasmann]]

==References==
{{Reflist|2}}

==References==
* Appleby, R. Scott. ''Between Americanism and Modernism; John Zahm and Theistic Evolution'', in ''Critical Issues in American Religious History: A Reader'', Ed. by Robert R. Mathisen, 2nd revised edn., Baylor University Press, 2006, {{ISBN|1-932792-39-2}}, {{ISBN|978-1-932792-39-3}}. [https://books.google.com/books?id=o6XnSnc4N1IC&dq=Holy+Cross+%22John+Augustine+Zahm%22+evolution&pg=PA423 Google books]
* [[Mariano Artigas|Artigas, Mariano]]; Glick, Thomas F., Martínez, Rafael A.; ''Negotiating Darwin: the Vatican confronts evolution, 1877–1902'', JHU Press, 2006, {{ISBN|0-8018-8389-X}}, 9780801883897, [https://books.google.com/books?id=Q8WrXHnQf8MC&dq=Darwin+Galileo+Catholic+Church&pg=PA5 Google books]
*Brundell, Barry, "Catholic Church Politics and Evolution Theory, 1894-1902", ''The British Journal for the History of Science'', Vol. 34, No. 1 (Mar., 2001), pp.&nbsp;81–95, Cambridge University Press on behalf of The British Society for the History of Science, [https://www.jstor.org/stable/4028040 JSTOR]
* [[Brian Harrison (theologian)|Harrison, Brian W.]], [http://www.rtforum.org/lt/lt93.html Early Vatican Responses to Evolutionist Theology], ''Living Tradition'', Organ of the Roman Theological Forum, May 2001.
*Morrison, John L., "William Seton: A Catholic Darwinist", ''The Review of Politics'', Vol. 21, No. 3 (Jul., 1959), pp.&nbsp;566–584, Cambridge University Press for the University of Notre Dame du lac, [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1405578 JSTOR]
* O'Leary, John. ''Roman Catholicism and modern science: a history'', Continuum International Publishing Group, 2006, {{ISBN|0-8264-1868-6}}, {{ISBN|978-0-8264-1868-5}} [https://books.google.com/books?id=5tieP7-FuYsC&dq=Evolution+catholic+education&pg=RA1-PA215 Google books]
*[[Eugenie C. Scott|Scott, Eugenie C.]], "Antievolution and Creationism in the United States", ''Annual Review of Anthropology'', Vol. 26, (1997), pp.&nbsp;263–289, [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2952523 JSTOR]

==Further reading==
* Bennett, Gaymon, Hess, Peter M. J. and others, ''The Evolution of Evil'', Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2008, {{ISBN|3-525-56979-3}}, {{ISBN|978-3-525-56979-5}}, [https://books.google.com/books?id=Vca7Y0VI5aAC&dq=Holy+Cross+%22John+Augustine+Zahm%22+evolution&pg=PA242 Google books]
* {{Cite book | last = Johnston | first = George | title = Did Darwin Get It Right? | publisher = Our Sunday Visitor | location = Huntington | year = 1998 | isbn = 0-87973-945-2 | url-access = registration | url = https://archive.org/details/diddarwingetitri0000john }} ([https://books.google.com/books?id=4N1F6SpusrgC&dq=Leo+XIII+%22theory+of+evolution%22&pg=PA117 google books])
*Hess, Peter M.J., ''Evolution, Suffering, and the God of Hope in Roman Catholic Thought after Darwin'', in ''The Evolution of Evil'' (contains summary history of RC reaction; other pieces in the book are also relevant), 2008, Editors:Gaymon Bennett, Ted Peters, Martinez J. Hewlett, Robert John Russell; Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, {{ISBN|3525569793}}, 9783525569795, [https://books.google.com/books?id=Vca7Y0VI5aAC&pg=PA239 Google books]
* [[Hans Küng|Küng, Hans]], ''The beginning of all things: science and religion'', trans. John Bowden, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2007, {{ISBN|0-8028-0763-1}}, {{ISBN|978-0-8028-0763-2}}. [https://books.google.com/books?id=XGaEjPVw9cwC&dq=Darwin+Galileo+Catholic+Church&pg=PA91 Google books]
* Olson, Richard, ''Science and religion, 1450–1900: from Copernicus to Darwin'', Greenwood Publishing Group, 2004, {{ISBN|0-313-32694-0}}, {{ISBN|978-0-313-32694-3}}. [https://books.google.com/books?id=uW7XerlWC4MC&dq=Darwin+Galileo+Catholic+Church&pg=PA213 Google books]
*[[Karl Rahner|Rahner, Karl]], ed. ''Encyclopedia of Theology: A Concise Sacramentum Mundi'', entry on "Evolution", 1975, Continuum International Publishing Group, {{ISBN|0860120066}}, 9780860120063, [https://books.google.com/books?id=WtnR-6_PlJAC&dq=%22special+transformism%22&pg=PA486 google books]

==External links==
* [http://www.ewtn.com/library/COUNCILS/V1.HTM Vatican Council I (1869–70), the full documents.]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20120519040156/http://biologos.org/uploads/projects/Lamoureux_Scholarly_Essay.pdf Evolutionary Creation: A Christian Approach to Evolution] by [[Denis Lamoureux]] ([[St. Joseph's College, Edmonton]])
* 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia: [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05654a.htm Catholics and Evolution] and [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05655a.htm Evolution, History and Scientific Foundation of]
* Pope Pius XII, [https://web.archive.org/web/20120419021937/https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xii_enc_12081950_humani-generis_en.html ''Humani generis'', 1950 encyclical]
* Roberto Masi, "[http://www.ewtn.com/library/Theology/SINEVOL.HTM The Credo of Paul VI: Theology of Original Sin and the Scientific Theory of Evolution]" (L'Osservatore Romano, 17 April 1969).
* Pope John Paul II, general audience of 10 July 1985. "[https://web.archive.org/web/20051025133825/http://www.its.caltech.edu/~nmcenter/sci-cp/sci85071.html Proofs for God's Existence are Many and Convergent]".
* Cardinal Ratzinger's Commentary on Genesis [http://www.bringyou.to/apologetics/p81.htm Excerpts from In the Beginning: A Catholic Understanding of the Story of Creation and the Fall].
* International Theological Commission (2004). "[http://www.bringyou.to/apologetics/p80.htm Communion and Stewardship: Human Persons Created in the Image of God]".
* Cardinal Paul Poupard, "[http://www.livescience.com/othernews/ap_051103_vatican.html Vatican Cardinal: Listen to What Modern Science has to Offer]", November 3, 2005.
* Mark Brumley, "[https://web.archive.org/web/20060715131220/http://www.intelligentproject.net/popeevolution.htm Evolution and the Pope], of [http://www.ignatiusinsight.com Ignatius Insight] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180127225908/http://www.ignatiusinsight.com/ |date=2018-01-27 }}
* John L. Allen [https://web.archive.org/web/20060930072306/http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=21156 Teaching of Benedict XVI on Evolution before becoming Pope.]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20090309133314/https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/homilies/documents/hf_ben-xvi_hom_20050424_inizio-pontificato_en.html Benedict XVI's inaugural address.]
* [https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_academies/acdscien/ Pontifical Academy of Sciences]
{{Catholic Church footer}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Catholic Church And Evolution}}
[[Category:Catholic Church and science]]
[[Category:Christianity and evolution]]