View source for Display resolution

{{short description|Width and height of a display in pixels}}
{{About||screen sizes (typically in inches, measured on the diagonal)|Display size|an extensive discussion of particular display resolutions|Display resolution standards}}
{{Wide image|Vector Video Standards8.svg|500px|This chart shows the most [[List of common resolutions|common display resolutions]], with the color of each resolution type indicating the display ratio (e.g. red indicates a 4:3 ratio). Printable variant is available [[:File:Vector Video Standards8 2023.svg|here]].|46%|right|alt=This chart shows the most [[List of common resolutions|common display resolutions]], with the color of each resolution type indicating the display ratio (e.g. red indicates a 4:3 ratio).}}

The '''display resolution''' or display modes of a [[digital television]], [[computer monitor]], or other [[display device]] is the number of distinct [[pixel]]s in each dimension that can be displayed. It can be an ambiguous term especially as the displayed resolution is controlled by different factors in [[cathode-ray tube]] (CRT) displays, [[flat-panel display]]s (including [[liquid-crystal display]]s) and projection displays using fixed picture-element (pixel) arrays.

It is usually quoted as ''{{resx|width|height}}'', with the units in pixels: for example, ''{{resx|1024|768}}'' means the width is 1024 pixels and the height is 768 pixels. This example would normally be spoken as "ten twenty-four by seven sixty-eight" or "ten twenty-four by seven six eight".

One use of the term ''display resolution'' applies to fixed-pixel-array displays such as [[plasma display panel]]s (PDP), liquid-crystal displays (LCD), [[Digital Light Processing]] (DLP) projectors, [[AMOLED|OLED]] displays, and similar technologies, and is simply the physical number of columns and rows of pixels creating the display (e.g. {{resx|1920|1080}}). A consequence of having a fixed-grid display is that, for multi-format video inputs, all displays need a "scaling engine" (a digital video processor that includes a memory array) to match the incoming picture format to the display.

For device displays such as phones, tablets, monitors and televisions, the use of the term ''display resolution'' as defined above is a misnomer, though common. The term ''display resolution'' is usually used to mean ''pixel dimensions'', the maximum number of pixels in each dimension (e.g. {{resx|1920|1080}}), which does not tell anything about the pixel density of the display on which the image is actually formed: resolution properly refers to the [[pixel density]], the number of pixels per unit distance or area, not the ''total'' number of pixels. In digital measurement, the display resolution would be given in pixels per inch (PPI). In analog measurement, if the screen is 10&nbsp;inches high, then the horizontal resolution is measured across a square 10&nbsp;inches wide.<ref>{{cite web |title=Screen resolution? Aspect ratio? What do 720p, 1080p, QHD, 4K and 8K mean? |url=http://www.digitalcitizen.life/what-screen-resolution-or-aspect-ratio-what-do-720p-1080i-1080p-mean |publisher=digitalcitizen.life |date=2016-05-20 |access-date=2017-08-28 }}</ref> For television standards, this is typically stated as "lines horizontal resolution, per picture height";<ref name="BE_Robin_2005">{{cite web |title=Horizontal resolution: Pixels or lines |url=http://broadcastengineering.com/infrastructure/broadcasting_horizontal_resolution_pixels |publisher=Broadcast Engineering |last=Robin |first=Michael |date=2005-04-01 |access-date=2012-07-22 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120815182205/http://broadcastengineering.com/infrastructure/broadcasting_horizontal_resolution_pixels |archive-date=2012-08-15 |url-status=dead }}</ref> for example, analog [[NTSC]] TVs can typically display about 340 lines of "per picture height" horizontal resolution from over-the-air sources, which is equivalent to about 440 total lines of actual picture information from left edge to right edge.<ref name="BE_Robin_2005"/>

==Background==
{{Unreferenced section|date=May 2023}}
[[Image:Progressive scan hdtv.svg|thumb|right|1080p progressive scan [[HDTV]], which uses a 16:9 ratio]]
Some commentators also use display resolution to indicate a range of input formats that the display's input electronics will accept and often include formats greater than the screen's native grid size even though they have to be down-scaled to match the screen's parameters (e.g. accepting a [[1080p|{{resx|1920|1080}}]] input on a display with a native {{resx|1366|768}} pixel array). In the case of television inputs, many manufacturers will take the input and zoom it out to "[[overscan]]" the display by as much as 5% so input resolution is not necessarily display resolution.

The eye's perception of ''display resolution'' can be affected by a number of factors{{snd}} see [[image resolution]] and [[optical resolution]]. One factor is the display screen's rectangular shape, which is expressed as the ratio of the physical picture width to the physical picture height. This is known as the [[aspect ratio (image)|aspect ratio]]. A screen's physical aspect ratio and the individual pixels' aspect ratio may not necessarily be the same. An array of [[Graphics display resolution#WXGA|{{resx|1280|720}}]] on a [[16:9]] display has square pixels, but an array of [[Graphics display resolution#XGA (1024x768)|{{resx|1024|768}}]] on a 16:9 display has oblong pixels.

An example of pixel shape affecting "resolution" or perceived sharpness: displaying more information in a smaller area using a higher resolution makes the image much clearer or "sharper". However, most recent screen technologies are fixed at a certain resolution; making the resolution lower on these kinds of screens will greatly decrease sharpness, as an interpolation process is used to "fix" the non-native resolution input into the display's [[native resolution]] output.

While some CRT-based displays may use [[digital video processing]] that involves [[image scaling]] using memory arrays, ultimately "display resolution" in CRT-type displays is affected by different parameters such as spot size and focus, [[Astigmatism (optical systems)|astigmatic effects]] in the display corners, the color phosphor pitch [[shadow mask]] (such as [[Trinitron]]) in color displays, and the video bandwidth.

==Aspects==
{{Unreferenced section|date=May 2023}}
[[File:Fatty watching himself on TV.jpg|thumb|right|A 16:9-ratio television from October 2004]]
[[File:MacBookEeePCNintendoDS.JPG|thumb|right|Difference between screen sizes in some common devices, specifically a [[Nintendo DS Lite]], an [[Asus Eee PC]], and an [[MacBook (2006–2012)|Apple MacBook]].]]

=== Overscan and underscan ===
{{Main|Overscan}}

Most television display manufacturers "overscan" the pictures on their displays (CRTs and PDPs, LCDs etc.), so that the effective on-screen picture may be reduced from {{resx|720|576}}&nbsp;(480) to {{resx|680|550}}&nbsp;(450), for example. The size of the invisible area somewhat depends on the display device. Some HD televisions do this as well, to a similar extent.

Computer displays including projectors generally do not overscan although many models (particularly CRT displays) allow it. CRT displays tend to be underscanned in stock configurations, to compensate for the increasing distortions at the corners.

=== Interlaced versus progressive scan ===
[[Interlaced video]] (also known as '''interlaced scan''') is a technique for doubling the perceived [[frame rate]] of a video display without consuming extra [[Bandwidth (signal processing)|bandwidth]]. The interlaced signal contains two [[Field (video)|fields]] of a video frame captured consecutively. This enhances motion perception to the viewer, and reduces [[Flicker (screen)|flicker]] by taking advantage of the [[phi phenomenon]].

The [[European Broadcasting Union]] has argued against interlaced video in production and broadcasting. The main argument is that no matter how complex the deinterlacing algorithm may be, the artifacts in the interlaced signal cannot be completely eliminated because some information is lost between frames. Despite arguments against it, television standards organizations continue to support interlacing. It is still included in digital video transmission formats such as [[DV (video format)|DV]], [[DVB]], and [[ATSC]]. New video compression standards like [[High Efficiency Video Coding]] are optimized for [[progressive scan]] video, but sometimes do support interlaced video.

[[Progressive scanning]] (alternatively referred to as '''noninterlaced scanning''') is a format of displaying, storing, or transmitting [[moving image]]s in which all the lines of each [[Film frame|frame]] are drawn in sequence. This is in contrast to [[interlaced video]] used in traditional [[analog television]] systems where only the odd lines, then the even lines of each frame (each image called a [[video field]]) are drawn alternately, so that only half the number of actual image frames are used to produce video.

==Televisions==
{{Further information|Display resolution standards|List of common display resolutions}}

===Current standards===
Televisions are of the following resolutions:

* Standard-definition television ([[SDTV]]):
** [[480i]] ([[NTSC|NTSC-compatible]] digital standard employing two [[Interlaced video|interlace]]d fields of 240 lines each)
** [[576i]] ([[PAL|PAL-compatible]] digital standard employing two interlaced fields of 288 lines each)
* Enhanced-definition television ([[EDTV]]):
** [[480p]] ({{resx|720|480}} [[progressive scan]])
** [[576p]] ({{resx|720|576}} progressive scan)
* High-definition television ([[HDTV]]):
** [[720p]] ({{resx|1280|720}} progressive scan)
** [[1080i]] ({{resx|1920|1080}} split into two interlaced fields of 540 lines)
** [[1080p]] ({{resx|1920|1080}} progressive scan)
* Ultra-high-definition television ([[UHDTV]]):
** [[4K UHD]] ({{resx|3840|2160}} progressive scan)
** [[8K UHD]] ({{resx|7680|4320}} progressive scan)

== Film industry ==
{{Further information|Display resolution standards|List of common display resolutions}}
As far as [[Digital cinematography#Video formats|digital cinematography]] is concerned, video resolution standards depend first on the frames' aspect ratio in the [[film stock]] (which is usually [[motion picture film scanner|scanned]] for [[digital intermediate]] post-production) and then on the actual points' count. Although there is not a unique set of standardized sizes, it is commonplace within the motion picture industry to refer to "''n''K" image "quality", where ''n'' is a (small, usually even) integer number which translates into a set of actual resolutions, depending on the [[film format]]. As a reference consider that, for a 4:3 (around 1.33:1) aspect ratio which a film frame (no matter what is its format) is expected to ''horizontally fit in'', ''n'' is the multiplier of 1024 such that the horizontal resolution is exactly ''1024•n'' points.{{citation needed |date=May 2018}} For example, [[2K resolution|2K reference resolution]] is {{resx|2048|1536}} pixels, whereas [[4K resolution|4K reference resolution]] is {{resx|4096|3072}} pixels. Nevertheless, 2K may also refer to resolutions like {{resx|2048|1556}} (full-aperture), {{resx|2048|1152}} ([[HDTV]], 16:9 aspect ratio) or {{resx|2048|872}} pixels ([[Cinemascope]], 2.35:1 aspect ratio). It is also worth noting that while a frame resolution may be, for example, 3:2 ({{resx|720|480}} NTSC), that is not what you will see on-screen (i.e. 4:3 or 16:9 depending on the intended aspect ratio of the original material).

== Computer monitors ==
{{Further information|Display resolution standards|List of computer display standards|List of common display resolutions}}

Computer monitors have traditionally possessed higher resolutions than most televisions.

=== Evolution of standards ===
[[File:C64 startup animiert.gif|thumb|In this image of a [[Commodore 64]] startup screen, the [[overscan]] region (the lighter-coloured border) would have been barely visible when shown on a normal television.]]
[[File:CGA CompVsRGB Text.png|thumb|A {{resx|640|200}} display as produced by a monitor (left) and television (right)]]
[[File:Torak.gif|thumb|16-color (top) and 256-color (bottom) progressive images from a 1980s [[VGA]] card. [[Dither]]ing is used to overcome color limitations.]]

Many personal computers introduced in the late 1970s and the 1980s were designed to use television receivers as their display devices, making the resolutions dependent on the television standards in use, including [[PAL]] and [[NTSC]]. Picture sizes were usually limited to ensure the visibility of all the pixels in the major television standards and the broad range of television sets with varying amounts of over scan. The actual drawable picture area was, therefore, somewhat smaller than the whole screen, and was usually surrounded by a static-colored border (see image below). Also, the interlace scanning was usually omitted in order to provide more stability to the picture, effectively halving the vertical resolution in progress. {{resx|160|200}}, {{resx|320|200}} and {{resx|640|200}} on NTSC were relatively common resolutions in the era (224, 240 or 256 scanlines were also common). In the IBM PC world, these resolutions came to be used by 16-color [[Enhanced Graphics Adapter|EGA]] video cards.

One of the drawbacks of using a classic television is that the computer display resolution is higher than the television could decode. Chroma resolution for NTSC/PAL televisions are bandwidth-limited to a maximum 1.5{{nbsp}}MHz, or approximately 160 pixels wide, which led to blurring of the color for 320- or 640-wide signals, and made text difficult to read (see example image below). Many users upgraded to higher-quality televisions with [[S-Video]] or [[Color Graphics Adapter|RGBI]] inputs that helped eliminate chroma blur and produce more legible displays. The earliest, lowest cost solution to the chroma problem was offered in the [[Atari 2600]] Video Computer System and the [[Apple II+]], both of which offered the option to disable the color and view a legacy black-and-white signal. On the Commodore 64, the [[GEOS (8-bit operating system)|GEOS]] mirrored the Mac OS method of using black-and-white to improve readability.

The {{resx|640|400i}} resolution ({{resx|720|480i}} with borders disabled) was first introduced by home computers such as the [[Commodore Amiga]] and, later, Atari Falcon. These computers used interlace to boost the maximum vertical resolution. These modes were only suited to graphics or gaming, as the flickering interlace made reading text in word processor, database, or spreadsheet software difficult. (Modern game consoles solve this problem by pre-filtering the 480i video to a lower resolution. For example, [[Final Fantasy XII]] suffers from flicker when the filter is turned off, but stabilizes once filtering is restored. The computers of the 1980s lacked sufficient power to run similar filtering software.)

The advantage of a {{resx|720|480i}} overscanned computer was an easy interface with interlaced TV production, leading to the development of Newtek's [[Video Toaster]]. This device allowed Amigas to be used for CGI creation in various news departments (example: weather overlays), drama programs such as NBC's ''[[seaQuest]]'' and The WB's ''[[Babylon 5]]''.

In the PC world, the [[IBM PS/2]] VGA (multi-color) on-board graphics chips used a non-interlaced (progressive) 640 × 480 × 16 color resolution that was easier to read and thus more useful for office work. It was the standard resolution from 1990 to around 1996.{{citation needed|date=October 2021}} The standard resolution was {{resx|800|600}} until around 2000. Microsoft [[Windows XP]], released in 2001, was designed to run at {{resx|800|600}} minimum, although it is possible to select the original {{resx|640|480}} in the Advanced Settings window.

Programs designed to mimic older hardware such as Atari, Sega, or Nintendo game consoles (emulators) when attached to multiscan CRTs, routinely use much lower resolutions, such as {{resx|160|200}} or {{resx|320|400}} for greater authenticity, though other emulators have taken advantage of pixelation recognition on circle, square, triangle and other geometric features on a lesser resolution for a more scaled vector rendering. Some emulators, at higher resolutions, can even mimic the aperture grille and shadow masks of CRT monitors.

In 2002, {{resx|1024|768}} [[XGA|eXtended Graphics Array]] was the most common display resolution. Many web sites and multimedia products were re-designed from the previous {{resx|800|600}} format to the layouts optimized for {{resx|1024|768}}.

The availability of inexpensive LCD monitors made the {{ratio|5:4}} aspect ratio resolution of {{resx|1280|1024}} more popular for desktop usage during the first decade of the 21st century. Many computer users including [[CAD]] users, graphic artists and video game players ran their computers at {{resx|1600|1200}} resolution ([[UXGA]]) or higher such as {{resx|2048|1536}} [[QXGA]] if they had the necessary equipment. Other available resolutions included oversize aspects like {{resx|1400|1050}} [[SXGA+]] and wide aspects like {{resx|1280|800}} [[Wide XGA|WXGA]], {{resx|1440|900}} [[WXGA+]], {{resx|1680|1050}} [[WSXGA+]], and {{resx|1920|1200}} [[WUXGA]]; monitors built to the 720p and 1080p standard were also not unusual among home media and video game players, due to the perfect screen compatibility with movie and video game releases. A new more-than-HD resolution of {{resx|2560|1600}} [[WQXGA]] was released in 30-inch LCD monitors in 2007.

In 2010, 27-inch LCD monitors with the {{resx|2560|1440}} resolution were released by multiple manufacturers, and in 2012, Apple introduced a {{resx|2880|1800}} display on the [[Retina MacBook Pro|MacBook Pro]]. Panels for professional environments, such as medical use and air traffic control, support resolutions up to {{resx|4096|2160}}<ref>{{Cite web|title=Eizo industrial monitor does 4K resolution at 36-inches, start saving now|url=https://www.engadget.com/2011-06-21-eizo-industrial-monitor-does-4k-resolution-at-36-inches-start-s.html|access-date=2021-05-15|website=Engadget|date=21 June 2011 |language=en-US}}</ref> (or, more relevant for control rooms, {{ratio|1:1}} {{resx|2048|2048}} pixels).<ref>{{Cite web|title=EIZO Releases 5th Generation 2K x 2K Primary Control Monitor with New Design and Extensive Customizability for ATC Centers {{!}} EIZO|url=https://www.eizoglobal.com/press/releases/htmls/sq2825.html|access-date=2021-05-15|website=www.eizoglobal.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=nikolai|title=Eizo outs Raptor WS3001 30-inch LCD monitor|date=February 2010|url=https://www.hitechreview.com/it-products/monitors/eizo-raptor-ws3001-30-inch-lcd-monitor/21781/,%20https://www.hitechreview.com/it-products/monitors/eizo-raptor-ws3001-30-inch-lcd-monitor/21781/|access-date=2021-05-15|language=en-US}}</ref>

=== Common display resolutions ===
{{Further|Display resolution standards|List of common computer display resolutions|List of computer display standards}}

{| class="sortable wikitable"
|+ Common display resolutions ([[N/A]] = not applicable)
|-
! Standard !! [[Aspect ratio]] !! Width ([[Pixel|px]]) !! Height (px) !! [[Megapixels]] 
!!data-sort-type="number"| [[Steam (service)|Steam]]<ref>{{cite web |title=Steam Hardware & Software Survey |url=https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey?platform=combined |publisher=Valve |access-date=2020-07-16 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200707214338/https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/ |archive-date=2020-07-07}}</ref> (%)
!!data-sort-type="number"| [[StatCounter]]<ref>{{cite web |url=https://gs.statcounter.com/screen-resolution-stats/desktop/worldwide/#monthly-202006-202006-bar |title=Desktop Screen Resolution Stats Worldwide |publisher=StatCounter |access-date=2020-07-16}}</ref> (%)
|-
| [[Graphics display resolution#nHD|nHD]] ||data-sort-value="1.778"| 16:9 || 640 || 360 || 0.230 || data-sort-value="0"| N/A || 0.47
|-
| [[VGA]] ||data-sort-value="1.333"| 4:3 || 640 || 480 || 0.307 || data-sort-value="0"| N/A || N/A
|-
| [[Graphics display resolution#SVGA|SVGA]] ||data-sort-value="1.333"| 4:3 || 800 || 600 || 0.480 || data-sort-value="0"| N/A || 0.76
|-
| [[XGA]] ||data-sort-value="1.333"| 4:3 || 1024 || 768 || 0.786 || 0.38 || 2.78
|-
| [[Graphics display resolution#WXGA HD|WX<!-- Don't label this as HD, this section is about computer monitors not TVs. Discuss on talk page if there is any dispute. -->GA]] ||data-sort-value="1.778"| 16:9 || 1280 || 720 || 0.922 || 0.36 || 4.82
|-
| [[Graphics display resolution#1280x800|WXGA]] ||data-sort-value="1.600"| 16:10 || 1280 || 800 || 1.024 || 0.61 || 3.08
|-
| [[Graphics display resolution#SXGA|SXGA]] ||data-sort-value="1.250"| 5:4 || 1280 || 1024 || 1.311 || 1.24 || 2.47
|-
| [[Graphics display resolution#1360x768|H<!-- Don't label this as WXGA, this section is about computer monitors not TVs. Discuss on talk page if there is any dispute. -->D]] ||data-sort-value="1.771"| ≈16:9 || 1360 || 768 || 1.044 || 1.55 || 1.38
|-
| [[Graphics display resolution#1366x768|H<!-- Don't label this as WXGA, this section is about computer monitors not TVs. Discuss on talk page if there is any dispute. -->D]] ||data-sort-value="1.779"| ≈16:9 || 1366 || 768 || 1.049 || 10.22 || 23.26
|-
| [[Graphics display resolution#WXGAplus|WXGA+]] ||data-sort-value="1.600"| 16:10 || 1440 || 900 || 1.296 || 3.12 || 6.98
|-
| N/A ||data-sort-value="1.778"| 16:9 || 1536 || 864 || 1.327 ||data-sort-value="0"| N/A || 8.53
|-
| [[Graphics display resolution#1600x900|HD+]] ||data-sort-value="1.778"| 16:9 || 1600 || 900 || 1.440 || 2.59 || 4.14
|-
| [[Graphics display resolution#UXGA|UXGA]] ||data-sort-value="1.333"| 4:3 || 1600 || 1200 || 1.920 || N/A || N/A
|-
| [[Graphics display resolution#WSXGAplus|WSXGA+]] ||data-sort-value="1.600"| 16:10 || 1680 || 1050 || 1.764 || 1.97 || 2.23
|-
| [[Graphics display resolution#FHD|FHD]] ||data-sort-value="1.778"| 16:9 || 1920 || 1080 || 2.074 || 64.81 || 20.41
|-
| [[Wide UXGA|WUXGA]] ||data-sort-value="1.600"| 16:10 || 1920 || 1200 || 2.304 || 0.81 || 0.93
|-
| [[Graphics display resolution#QWXGA|QWXGA]] || data-sort-value="1.778" | 16:9 || 2048 || 1152 || 2.359 ||data-sort-value="0"| N/A || 0.51
|-
| [[Display_resolution_standards#2048_×_1536_(QXGA)|QXGA]] || data-sort-value="1.333" | 4:3 || 2048 || 1536 || 3.145 || || 
|-
| [[Graphics display resolution#2560x1080|UWFHD]] || data-sort-value="2.370" | ≈21:9 || 2560 || 1080 || 2.765 || 1.13 || data-sort-value="0" | N/A
|-
| [[Graphics display resolution#QHD|QHD]] || data-sort-value="1.778" | 16:9 || 2560 || 1440 || 3.686 || 6.23 || 2.15
|-
| [[Graphics display resolution#WQXGA|WQXGA]] || data-sort-value="1.6" | 16:10 || 2560 || 1600 || 4.096 || <0.58 || <2.4
|-
| [[Graphics display resolution#3440x1440|UWQHD]] || data-sort-value="2.389" | ≈21:9 || 3440 || 1440 || 4.954 || 0.87 || data-sort-value="0" | N/A
|-
| [[Graphics display resolution#4K UHD|4K UHD]] ||data-sort-value="1.778"| 16:9 || 3840 || 2160 || 8.294 || 2.12 || data-sort-value="0" | N/A
|-
| [[Graphics display resolution#5K|5K]] ||data-sort-value="1.778"| 16:9 || 5120 || 2880 ||14.745  || || data-sort-value="0" | N/A
|-
| [[Graphics display resolution#6K| 6K]] ||data-sort-value="1.778"| 16:9 || 6144 || 3456 || 21.234 || ||
|-
| DUHD ||data-sort-value="3.556"| 32:9 || 7680 || 2160 || 16.588||  || data-sort-value="0" | N/A
|-
| [[Graphics display resolution#8K UHD|8K UHD]] ||data-sort-value="1.778"| 16:9 || 7680 || 4320 || 33.177 || || data-sort-value="0" | N/A
|- class="sortbottom"
| Other || || || || || 2.00 || 15.09
|}

In recent years the 16:9 aspect ratio has become more common in notebook displays, and {{resx|1366|768}} ([[720p|HD]]) has become popular for most low-cost notebooks, while {{resx|1920|1080}} ([[FHD]]) and higher resolutions are available for more premium notebooks.

When a computer display resolution is set higher than the physical screen resolution (''native resolution''), some video drivers make the virtual screen scrollable over the physical screen thus realizing a two dimensional [[virtual desktop]] with its viewport. Most LCD manufacturers do make note of the panel's native resolution as working in a non-native resolution on LCDs will result in a poorer image, due to dropping of pixels to make the image fit (when using DVI) or insufficient sampling of the analog signal (when using VGA connector). Few CRT manufacturers will quote the true native resolution, because CRTs are analog in nature and can vary their display from as low as 320 × 200 (emulation of older computers or game consoles) to as high as the internal board will allow, or the image becomes too detailed for the vacuum tube to recreate (i.e., analog blur). Thus, CRTs provide a variability in resolution that fixed resolution LCDs cannot provide.

==See also==
* [[Display aspect ratio]]
* [[Display size]]
* [[Pixel density#Calculation of monitor PPI|Pixel density of computer displays]]&nbsp;– PPI <small>(for example, a 20-inch 1680 × 1050 screen has a PPI of 99.06)</small>
* [[Resolution independence]]
* [[Ultrawide formats]]
* [[Video scaler]]
* [[Widescreen]]

==References==
{{Reflist}}

{{Computer display standard}}
{{Compression methods}}
{{TV resolution}}

[[Category:Digital imaging]]
[[Category:Display technology]]
[[Category:Television technology]]
[[Category:Television terminology]]
[[Category:Video signal]]
[[Category:Data compression]]