View source for Dirichlet eta function

{{Short description|Function in analytic number theory}}{{For|the modular form|Dedekind eta function}}
{{More footnotes|date=August 2017}}

[[File:Dirichlet eta function.png|right|thumb|Color representation of the Dirichlet eta function.  It is generated as a [[Matplotlib]] plot using a version of the [[Domain coloring]] method.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://nbviewer.ipython.org/github/empet/Math/blob/master/DomainColoring.ipynb | title=Jupyter Notebook Viewer}}</ref>]]

In [[mathematics]], in the area of [[analytic number theory]], the '''Dirichlet eta function''' is defined by the following [[Dirichlet series]], which converges for any [[complex number]] having real part > 0:
<math display="block">\eta(s) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}{(-1)^{n-1} \over n^s} = \frac{1}{1^s} - \frac{1}{2^s} + \frac{1}{3^s} - \frac{1}{4^s} + \cdots.</math>

This Dirichlet series is the alternating sum corresponding to the Dirichlet series expansion of the [[Riemann zeta function]], ''ζ''(''s'') — and for this reason the Dirichlet eta function is also known as the '''alternating zeta function''', also denoted ''ζ''*(''s'').  The following relation holds:
<math display="block">\eta(s) = \left(1-2^{1-s}\right) \zeta(s)</math>

Both the Dirichlet eta function and the Riemann zeta function are special cases of [[Polylogarithm#Relationship to other functions|polylogarithms]].

While the Dirichlet series expansion for the eta function is convergent only for any [[complex number]] ''s'' with real part > 0, it is [[divergent series|Abel summable]] for any complex number.  This serves to define the eta function as an [[entire function]].  (The above relation and the facts that the eta function is entire and <math>\eta(1) \neq 0</math> together show the zeta function is [[meromorphic function|meromorphic]] with a simple [[pole (complex analysis)|pole]] at ''s'' = 1, and possibly additional poles at the other zeros of the factor <math>1-2^{1-s}</math>, although in fact these hypothetical additional poles do not exist.)

Equivalently, we may begin by defining
<math display="block">\eta(s) = \frac{1}{\Gamma(s)}\int_0^\infty \frac{x^{s-1}}{e^x+1}{dx}</math>
which is also defined in the region of positive real part (<math>\Gamma(s)</math> represents the [[gamma function]]). This gives the eta function as a [[Mellin transform]].

[[G. H. Hardy|Hardy]] gave a simple proof of the [[functional equation]] for the eta function,<ref>Hardy, G. H. (1922). A new proof of the functional equation for the Zeta-function. Matematisk Tidsskrift. B, 71–73. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24529536</ref> which is
<math display="block">\eta(-s) = 2 \frac{1-2^{-s-1}}{1-2^{-s}} \pi^{-s-1} s \sin\left({\pi s \over 2}\right) \Gamma(s)\eta(s+1).</math>

From this, one immediately has the functional equation of the zeta function also, as well as another means to extend the definition of eta to the entire complex plane.

==Zeros==
The [[Zero (complex analysis)|zeros]] of the eta function include all the zeros of the zeta function: the negative even integers (real equidistant simple zeros); the zeros along the critical line, none of which are known to be multiple and over 40% of which have been proven to be simple, and the hypothetical zeros in the critical strip but not on the critical line, which if they do exist must occur at the vertices of rectangles symmetrical around the ''x''-axis and the critical line and whose multiplicity is unknown. {{citation needed|date=February 2020}} In addition, the factor <math>1-2^{1-s}</math> adds an infinite number of complex simple zeros, located at equidistant points on the line <math>\Re(s) = 1</math>, at <math>s_n=1+2n\pi i/\ln(2)</math> where ''n'' is any nonzero [[integer]].

The zeros of the eta function are located symmetrically with respect to the real axis and under the [[Riemann hypothesis]] would be on two parallel lines <math>\Re(s)=1/2, \Re(s)=1</math>, and on the perpendicular half line formed by the negative real axis.

==Landau's problem with ''ζ''(''s'') = ''η''(''s'')/ (1 − (2^(1−s)))  and solutions==
In the equation {{math|1=''η''(''s'') = (1 − 2<sup>1−''s''</sup>) ''ζ''(''s'')}}, "the pole of {{math|''ζ''(''s'')}} at {{math|1=''s'' = 1}} is cancelled by the zero of the other factor" (Titchmarsh, 1986, p.&nbsp;17), and as a result {{math|''η''(1)}} is neither infinite nor zero (see {{section link||Particular values}}). However, in the equation
<math display="block">\zeta(s)=\frac{\eta(s)}{1-2^{1-s}},</math>
''η'' must be zero at all the points <math>s_n = 1+n\frac{2\pi}{\ln{2}}i, n\ne0, n \in \Z </math>, where the denominator is zero, if the Riemann zeta function is analytic and finite there. The problem of proving this without defining the zeta function first was signaled and left open by [[Edmund Landau|E. Landau]] in his 1909 treatise on number theory: "Whether the eta series is different from zero or not at the points <math>s_n\ne1</math>, i.e., whether these are poles of zeta or not, is not readily apparent here."

A first solution for Landau's problem was published almost 40 years later by [[David Widder|D. V. Widder]] in his book The Laplace Transform. It uses the next prime 3 instead of 2 to define a Dirichlet series similar to the eta function, which we will call the <math>\lambda</math> function, defined for <math>\Re(s)>0</math> and with some zeros also on <math>\Re(s) = 1</math>, but not equal to those of eta.
{{math proof|title=Indirect proof of {{math|1=''η''(''s''<sub>''n''</sub>) = 0}} following Widder|proof=
<math display="block">\lambda(s)
= \left(1-\frac{3}{3^s}\right)\zeta(s)
= \left(1+\frac{1}{2^s}\right)-\frac{2}{3^s}+\left(\frac{1}{4^s}+\frac{1}{5^s}\right)-\frac{2}{6^s} + \cdots</math>

If <math>s</math> is real and strictly positive, the series converges since the regrouped terms alternate in sign and decrease in absolute value to zero. According to a theorem on uniform convergence of Dirichlet series first proven by Cahen in 1894, the <math>\lambda(s)</math> function is then analytic for <math>\Re(s)>0</math>, a region which includes the line 
<math>\Re(s)=1</math>. Now we can define correctly, where the denominators are not zero,
<math display="block">\zeta(s) = \frac{\eta(s)}{1-\frac{2}{2^s}}</math>
or
<math display="block">\zeta(s) = \frac{\lambda(s)}{1-\frac{3}{3^s}}</math>

Since <math>\frac{\log 3}{\log 2}</math> is irrational, the denominators in the two definitions are not zero at the same time except for <math>s=1</math>, and the <math>\zeta(s)\,</math> function is thus well defined and analytic for <math>\Re(s)>0</math> except at <math>s=1</math>. We finally get indirectly that <math>\eta(s_n)=0</math> when <math>s_n\ne1</math>:
<math display="block">
\eta(s_n) = \left(1-\frac{2}{2^{s_n}}\right)\zeta(s_n)
          = \frac{1-\frac{2}{2^{s_n}}}{1-\frac{3}{3^{s_n}}} \lambda(s_n) = 0.
</math>
}}

An elementary direct and <math>\zeta\,</math>-independent proof of the vanishing of the eta function at <math>s_n\ne1</math> was published by J. Sondow in 2003. It expresses the value of the eta function as the limit of special  Riemann sums associated to an integral known to be zero, using a relation between the partial sums of the Dirichlet series defining the eta and zeta functions for <math>\Re(s)>1</math>.

{{math proof|title=Direct proof of {{math|1=''η''(''s''<sub>''n''</sub>) = 0}} by Sondow|proof=
With some simple algebra performed on finite sums, we can write for any complex ''s''
<math display="block">\begin{align}
\eta_{2n}(s)
&=   \sum_{k=1}^{2n}\frac{(-1)^{k-1}}{k^s} \\
&=   1-\frac{1}{2^s}+\frac{1}{3^s}-\frac{1}{4^s}+\dots+\frac{(-1)^{2n-1}}{{(2n)}^s} \\[2pt]
&=   1+\frac{1}{2^s}+\frac{1}{3^s}+\frac{1}{4^s}+\dots+\frac{1}{{(2n)}^s}
  - 2\left(\frac{1}{2^s}+\frac{1}{4^s}+\dots+\frac{1}{{(2n)}^s}\right) \\[2pt]
&=   \left(1-\frac{2}{2^s}\right)\zeta_{2n}(s) + \frac{2}{2^s}\left(\frac{1}{{(n+1)}^s} + \dots + \frac{1}{{(2n)}^s}\right) \\[2pt]
&=   \left(1-\frac{2}{2^s}\right)\zeta_{2n}(s) + \frac{2n}{{(2n)}^s}\,\frac{1}{n}\,\left(\frac{1}{{(1+1/n)}^s}+ \dots + \frac{1}{{(1+n/n)}^s} \right).
\end{align}</math>

Now if <math>s=1+it</math> and <math>2^s=2</math>, the factor multiplying <math>\zeta_{2n}(s)</math> is zero, and
<math display="block">\eta_{2n}(s) = \frac{1}{n^{it}} R_n\left(\frac{1}{{(1+x)}^s},0,1\right),</math>
where {{math|''R''<sub>''n''</sub>(''f''(''x''), ''a'', ''b'')}} denotes a special Riemann sum approximating the integral of {{math|''f''(''x'')}} over {{closed-closed|''a'', ''b''}}.
For {{math|1=''t'' = 0}} i.e., {{math|1=''s'' = 1}}, we get
<math display="block">\eta(1) = \lim_{n\to\infty} \eta_{2n}(1) = \lim_{n\to\infty} R_n\left(\frac{1}{1+x},0,1\right) = \int_0^1 \frac{dx}{1+x} = \log 2 \ne 0.</math>

Otherwise, if <math>t \ne 0</math>, then <math>|n^{1-s}|=|n^{-it}|=1</math>, which yields
<math display="block">
|\eta(s)| = \lim_{n\to\infty} |\eta_{2n}(s)| = \lim_{n\to\infty} \left|R_n\left(\frac{1}{{(1+x)}^s},0,1\right)\right|
   =  \left|\int_0^1 \frac{dx}{{(1+x)}^s}\right| = \left|\frac{2^{1-s}-1}{1-s}\right| = \left|\frac{1-1}{-it}\right| = 0.
</math>
}}

Assuming <math>\eta(s_n)=0</math>, for each point <math>s_n\ne1</math> where <math>2^{s_n}=2</math>, we can now define <math>\zeta(s_n)\,</math> by continuity as follows,
<math display="block">
\zeta(s_n) = \lim_{s\to s_n}\frac{\eta(s)}{1-\frac{2}{2^s}}
 = \lim_{s\to s_n}\frac{\eta(s)-\eta(s_n)}{\frac{2}{2^{s_n}}-\frac{2}{2^s}}
 = \lim_{s\to s_n}\frac{\eta(s)-\eta(s_n)}{s-s_n}\,\frac{s-s_n}{\frac{2}{2^{s_n}}-\frac{2}{2^s}}
 = \frac{\eta'(s_n)}{\log(2)}.
</math>

The apparent singularity of zeta at <math>s_n\ne1</math> is now removed, and the zeta function is proven to  be analytic everywhere in <math>\Re{s} > 0</math>, except at <math>s=1</math> where
<math display="block">
\lim_{s \to 1} (s-1)\zeta(s) = \lim_{s\to 1} \frac{\eta(s)}{\frac{1-2^{1-s}}{s-1}}
 = \frac{\eta(1)}{\log 2} = 1.
</math>

==Integral representations==
A number of integral formulas involving the eta function can be listed. The first one follows from a change of variable of the integral representation of the Gamma function (Abel, 1823), giving a [[Mellin transform]] which can be expressed in different ways as a double integral (Sondow, 2005). This is valid for <math>\Re s > 0.</math>
<math display="block">\begin{align}
\Gamma(s)\eta(s)
&= \int_0^\infty \frac{x^{s-1}}{e^x+1} \, dx
 = \int_0^\infty \int_0^x \frac{x^{s-2}}{e^x+1} \, dy \, dx \\[8pt]
&= \int_0^\infty \int_0^\infty \frac{(t+r)^{s-2}}{e^{t+r}+1} dr \, dt
 =\int_0^1 \int_0^1 \frac{\left(-\log(x y)\right)^{s-2}}{1 + x y} \, dx \, dy.
\end{align}</math>

The Cauchy–Schlömilch transformation (Amdeberhan, Moll et al., 2010) can be used to prove this other representation, valid for <math>\Re s > -1</math>. [[Integration by parts]] of the first integral above in this section yields another derivation.

<math display="block">2^{1-s}\,\Gamma(s+1)\,\eta(s)
= 2 \int_0^\infty \frac{x^{2s+1}}{\cosh^2(x^2)} \, dx
= \int_0^\infty \frac{t^s}{\cosh^2(t)} \, dt.</math>

The next formula, due to Lindelöf (1905), is valid over the whole complex plane, when the principal value is taken for the logarithm implicit in the exponential.
<math display="block">\eta(s) = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{(1/2 + i t)^{-s}}{e^{\pi t}+e^{-\pi t}} \, dt.</math>
This corresponds to a [[Johan Jensen (mathematician)|Jensen]] (1895) formula for the entire function 
<math>(s-1)\,\zeta(s)</math>, valid over the whole complex plane and also proven by Lindelöf.
<math display="block">(s-1)\zeta(s) = 2\pi\,\int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{(1/2 + i t)^{1-s}}{(e^{\pi t}+e^{-\pi t})^2} \, dt. </math>
"This formula, remarquable by its simplicity, can be proven easily with the help of Cauchy's theorem, so important for the summation of series" wrote Jensen (1895). Similarly by converting the integration paths to contour integrals one can obtain other formulas for the eta function, such as this generalisation (Milgram, 2013) valid for <math>0 < c < 1</math> and all <math>s</math>:
<math display="block">\eta(s) = \frac{1}{2} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{(c + i t)^{-s}}{\sin{(\pi(c+i t))}} \, dt.</math>
The zeros on the negative real axis are factored out cleanly by making <math>c\to 0^+</math> (Milgram, 2013) to obtain a formula valid for <math>\Re s < 0</math>:
<math display="block">\eta(s) = - \sin\left(\frac{s\pi}{2}\right) \int_{0}^\infty \frac{t^{-s}}{\sinh{(\pi t)}} \, dt.</math>

==Numerical algorithms==
Most of the [[series acceleration]] techniques developed for [[alternating series]] can be profitably applied to the evaluation of the eta function. One particularly simple, yet reasonable method is to apply [[Binomial transform#Euler transform|Euler's transformation of alternating series]], to obtain
<math display="block">\eta(s)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{1}{2^{n+1}} 
\sum_{k=0}^n (-1)^{k} {n \choose k} \frac {1}{(k+1)^s}. </math>

Note that the second, inside summation is a [[forward difference]].

=== Borwein's method ===
[[Peter Borwein]] used approximations involving [[Chebyshev polynomials]] to produce a method for efficient evaluation of the eta function.<ref>{{cite book | first=Peter | last=Borwein | author-link=Peter Borwein | url=http://www.cecm.sfu.ca/personal/pborwein/PAPERS/P155.pdf | chapter=An efficient algorithm for the Riemann zeta function | series=Conference Proceedings, Canadian Mathematical Society | year=2000 | title=Constructive, Experimental, and Nonlinear Analysis | volume=27 | pages=29–34 | isbn=978-0-8218-2167-1 | editor-first=Michel A. | editor-last=Théra | publisher=[[American Mathematical Society]], on behalf of the [[Canadian Mathematical Society]] | location=Providence, RI | access-date=2008-09-20 | archive-date=2011-07-26 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110726090927/http://www.cecm.sfu.ca/personal/pborwein/PAPERS/P155.pdf | url-status=dead }}</ref> If
<math display="block">d_k = n\sum_{\ell=0}^k \frac{(n+\ell-1)!4^\ell}{(n-\ell)!(2\ell)!}</math>
then
<math display="block">\eta(s) = -\frac{1}{d_n} \sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\frac{(-1)^k(d_k-d_n)}{(k+1)^s}+\gamma_n(s),</math>
where for <math>\Re(s) \ge \frac{1}{2} </math> the error term {{math|''γ''<sub>''n''</sub>}} is bounded by
<math display="block">|\gamma_n(s)| \le \frac{3}{(3+\sqrt{8})^n} (1+2|\Im(s)|)\exp\left(\frac{\pi}{2}|\Im(s)|\right).</math>

The factor of <math>3+\sqrt{8}\approx 5.8</math> in the error bound indicates that the Borwein series converges quite rapidly as ''n'' increases.

==Particular values==
{{further|Zeta constant}}
*''η''(0) = {{1/2}}, the [[Abel summation|Abel sum]] of [[Grandi's series]] 1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + ⋯.
*''η''(−1) = {{1/4}}, the Abel sum of [[1 − 2 + 3 − 4 + ⋯]].
*For positive integer ''k'',
<math display="block">\eta(1-k) = \frac{2^k-1}{k} B^{+{}}_k,</math> where {{math|''B''{{su|p=+|b=''n''}}}} is the ''k''-th [[Bernoulli number]].

Also:
*<math>\eta(1) = \ln2 </math>, this is the [[alternating harmonic series]]
*<math>\eta(2) = {\pi^2 \over 12} </math> {{OEIS2C|A072691}}
*<math>\eta(4) = {{7\pi^4} \over 720} \approx 0.94703283</math>
*<math>\eta(6) = {{31\pi^6} \over 30240} \approx 0.98555109</math>
*<math>\eta(8) = {{127\pi^8} \over 1209600} \approx 0.99623300</math>
*<math>\eta(10) = {{73\pi^{10}} \over 6842880} \approx 0.99903951</math>
*<math>\eta(12) = {{1414477\pi^{12}} \over {1307674368000}} \approx 0.99975769</math>

The general form for even positive integers is:
<math display="block">\eta(2n) = (-1)^{n+1}{{B_{2n}\pi^{2n} \left(2^{2n-1} - 1\right)} \over {(2n)!}}. </math>

Taking the limit <math>n \to \infty</math>, one obtains <math>\eta (\infty) = 1</math>.

==Derivatives==
The derivative with respect to the parameter {{mvar|s}} is for <math>s\neq 1</math>
<math display="block">\eta'(s) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n\ln n}{n^s} = 2^{1-s}\ln(2)\,\zeta(s)+(1-2^{1-s})\,\zeta'(s).</math>
<math display="block">\eta'(1) = \ln(2)\,\gamma-\ln(2)^2\,2^{-1}</math>

== References ==
{{Reflist}}
* {{cite journal
|last1=Jensen
|first1=J. L. W. V.
|title=Remarques relatives aux réponses de MM. Franel et Kluyver
|journal=L'Intermédiaire des Mathématiciens
|volume=II
|year=1895
|url=https://gdz.sub.uni-goettingen.de/id/PPN599473517_0002?tify={%22pages%22:[358]}
|page=346]
}}
* {{cite book
|last1=Lindelöf
|first1=Ernst
|title=Le calcul des résidus et ses applications à la théorie des fonctions
|url=https://archive.org/details/lecalculdesrsid00lindgoog
|publisher=Gauthier-Villars
|year=1905
|page=[https://archive.org/details/lecalculdesrsid00lindgoog/page/n115 103]
}}
* {{cite book
|last1=Widder
|first1=David Vernon
|title=The Laplace Transform
|url=https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.201038
|publisher=Princeton University Press
|year=1946
|page=[https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.201038/page/n244 230]
}}
* Landau, Edmund, Handbuch der Lehre von der Verteilung der Primzahlen, Erster Band, Berlin, 1909, p.&nbsp;160. (Second edition by Chelsea, New York, 1953, p.&nbsp;160, 933)
* Titchmarsh, E. C. (1986). The Theory of the Riemann Zeta Function, Second revised (Heath-Brown) edition. Oxford University Press.
* {{cite journal
|last1=Conrey
|first1=J. B.
|title=More than two fifths of the zeros of the Riemann zeta function are on the critical line
|journal=Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik
|volume=1989
|year=1989
|issue=399
|pages=1–26
|doi=10.1515/crll.1989.399.1
|s2cid=115910600
}}
*{{cite book |last=Knopp |first=Konrad |author-link=Konrad Knopp |title=Theory and Application of Infinite Series |year=1990 |orig-year=1922 |publisher=Dover |isbn=0-486-66165-2}}
* Borwein, P., ''[http://www.cecm.sfu.ca/personal/pborwein/PAPERS/P155.pdf An Efficient Algorithm for the Riemann Zeta Function] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110726090927/http://www.cecm.sfu.ca/personal/pborwein/PAPERS/P155.pdf |date=2011-07-26 }}'', Constructive experimental and nonlinear analysis, CMS Conference Proc. 27 (2000), 29–34.
* {{cite journal
|last1=Sondow
|first1=Jonathan
|arxiv=math.CO/0211148
|title= Double integrals for Euler's constant and ln 4/π and an analog of Hadjicostas's formula
|journal=Amer. Math. Monthly
|year=2005
|volume=112
|pages=61–65
}} Amer. Math. Monthly 112 (2005) 61–65, formula 18.
* {{cite journal
|last1=Sondow
|first1=Jonathan
|arxiv=math/0209393
|title=Zeros of the Alternating Zeta Function on the Line R(s)=1|journal=Amer. Math. Monthly
|year=2003
|volume=110
|pages=435–437
}} Amer. Math. Monthly, 110 (2003) 435–437.
* {{cite web
|first1=Xavier
|last1=Gourdon
|first2=Pascal
|last2=Sebah
|url=http://numbers.computation.free.fr/Constants/Miscellaneous/zetaevaluations.pdf
|title= Numerical evaluation of the Riemann Zeta-function
|year=2003
}}
* {{cite arXiv
|first1=T.
|last1=Amdeberhan
|first2=M. L.
|last2=Glasser
|first3=M. C
|last3=Jones
|first4=V. H.
|last4=Moll
|first5=R.
|last5=Posey
|first6=D.
|last6=Varela
|eprint=1004.2445
|year=2010
|title=The Cauchy–Schlomilch Transformation|class=math.CA
}} p.&nbsp;12.
* {{cite journal
|first1=Michael S.
|last1=Milgram
|arxiv=1208.3429
|year=2012
|title=Integral and Series Representations of Riemann's Zeta Function, Dirichlet's Eta Function and a Medley of Related Results
|doi=10.1155/2013/181724
|volume=2013
|journal=Journal of Mathematics
|pages=1–17|doi-access=free
}}.

[[Category:Zeta and L-functions]]