View source for Confucianism

{{short description|Chinese ethical and philosophical system}}
{{pp-vandalism|small=yes}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2020}}
{{Confucianism}}
{{Infobox Chinese
| c = 儒家
| l = ''Ru'' school of thought
| p = Rújiā
| w = {{tone superscript|Ju2-chia1}}
| gr = Rujia
| mi = {{IPAc-cmn|r|u|2|.|j|ia|1}}
| suz = Zyú-ka
| j = jyu4 gaa1
| y = Yùhgāa
| ci = {{IPAc-yue|j|yu|4|-|g|aa|1}}
| tl = Jû-ka, Lû-ka
| mc = Nyu-kæ
| oc-bs = *{{IPA|no kˤra}}
| c2 = 儒教
| l2 = ''Ru'' religious doctrine
| p2 = Rújiào
| w2 = {{tone superscript|Ju2-chiao4}}
| j2 = jyu4 gaau3
| y2 = Yùhgaau
| t3 = 儒學
| s3 = 儒学
| l3 = ''Ru'' studies
| p3 = Rúxué
| w3 = {{tone superscript|Ju2-hsüeh2}}
| j3 = jyu4 hok6
| y3 = Yùhhohk
| vie = Nho giáo
| chuhan = 儒教
| lqn = ''Ru'' teachings
| hangul = 유교
| hanja = 儒敎
| rr = Yugyo
| kanji = 儒教
| romaji = Jukyō
| tp = Rú-jia
| bpmf = ㄖㄨˊ ㄐㄧㄚ
| hiragana = じゅきょう
| katakana = ジュキョウ
| kunrei = Zyukyô
| tp2 = Rú-jiào
| mi2 = {{IPAc-cmn|r|u|2|.|j|iao|4}}
| ci2 = {{IPAc-yue|j|yu|4|.|g|aau|3}}
| bpmf2 = ㄖㄨˊ ㄐㄧㄠˋ
| tp3 = Rú-syué
| mi3 = {{IPAc-cmn|r|u|2|.|xue|2}}
| ci3 = {{IPAc-yue|j|yu|4|.|h|ok|6}}
| bpmf3 = ㄖㄨˊ ㄒㄩㄝˊ
}}
[[File:Jiangyin wenmiao dachengdian.jpg|thumb|upright=1.15|[[Temple of Confucius]] of [[Jiangyin]], [[Wuxi]], [[Jiangsu]]. It is a ''wenmiao'' ({{lang-zh|c=文庙|labels=no}}), a temple where [[Confucius]] is worshipped as [[Chinese gods and immortals|''Wendi'', "God of Culture"]] ({{lang-zh|c=文帝|labels=no}}).]]
[[File:Datong Wenmiao 2013.08.29 11-33-25.jpg|thumb|upright=1.15|Gates of the ''wenmiao'' of [[Datong]], [[Shanxi]]]]
'''Confucianism''', also known as '''Ruism''' or '''Ru classicism''',<ref>{{Cite book |last=Nylan |first=Michael| author-link =Michael Nylan|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KykM1DhBxd8C |title=The Five "Confucian" Classics |date=1 October 2008 |publisher=Yale University Press |isbn=978-0-300-13033-1 |page=23 |language=en |access-date=12 March 2022}}</ref> is a system of thought and behavior originating in [[ancient China]], and is variously described as a [[tradition]], [[philosophy]], [[Religious Confucianism|religion]], [[theory of government]], or [[culture|way of life]].<ref>{{harvnb|Yao|2000|pp=38–47}}</ref> Founded by [[Confucius]] in the [[Hundred Schools of Thought]] era (c. 500 BCE), Confucianism integrates philosophy, ethics, and social governance, with a core focus on [[virtue]], [[Harmonious Society|social harmony]], and [[Filial piety|familial responsibility]].{{sfnb|Fingarette|1972|pp=1–2}}

Confucianism emphasizes virtue through self-cultivation and communal effort.<ref name=":1" /> Key virtues include ''[[Ren (philosophy)|ren]]'' ({{lang|zh|仁}}, "benevolence"), ''[[Yi (philosophy)|yi]]'' ({{lang|zh|義}}; "righteousness"), ''[[Li (Confucianism)|li]]'' ({{lang|zh|禮}}; "propriety"), ''[[Wisdom|zhi]]'' ({{lang|zh|智}}; "wisdom"), and ''[[Xin (virtue)|xin]]'' ({{lang|zh|信}}; "sincerity").{{sfnb|Tay|2010|p=102}} These values, deeply tied to the notion of ''[[tian]]'' ({{lang|zh|天}}; "Heaven"), present a worldview where human relationships and social order are manifestations of sacred moral principles.<ref name="Juergensmeyer">{{Cite book |last=Juergensmeyer |first=Mark |title=Religion in Global Civil Society |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2005 |isbn=978-0-19-518835-6 |editor-last=Juergensmeyer |editor-first=Mark |page=70 |doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195188356.001.0001 |quote=...{{nbsp}}humanist philosophies such as Confucianism, which do not share a belief in divine law and do not exalt faithfulness to a higher law as a manifestation of divine will}}.</ref>{{sfnb|Adler|2014|p=12}}{{sfnb|Littlejohn|2010|pp=34–36}} While Confucianism does not emphasize an [[omnipotent]] deity, it upholds ''tian'' as a transcendent moral order.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Confucianism |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Confucianism |access-date=2023-04-30 |publisher=[[Encyclopedia Britannica]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-05-20 |title=Confucianism |url=https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/confucianism |access-date=2023-04-30 |publisher=[[National Geographic Society]]}}</ref><ref>{{harvp|Adler|2014|pp=10, 12}}

* Quote, p. 10: "Confucianism is basically ''non-theistic''. While ''tiān'' has some characteristics that overlap the category of deity, it is primarily an ''impersonal'' absolute, like {{lang|zh-Latn|dao}} and ''Brahman''. "Deity" ({{lang|grc-Latn|theos}}, {{lang|la|deus}}), on the other hand connotes something ''personal'' (he or she, not it)."
* Quote, p. 12: "Confucianism deconstructs the sacred-profane dichotomy; it asserts that sacredness is to be found {{em|in}}, not behind or beyond, the ordinary activities of human life—and especially in human relationships. Human relationships are sacred in Confucianism because they are the expression of our moral nature ({{zhi|c=性|p=xìng}}), which has a transcendent anchorage in Heaven ({{zhi|p=tiān|c=天}}). Herbert Fingarette captured this essential feature of Confucianism in the title of his 1972 book, ''Confucius: The Secular as Sacred''. To assume a dualistic relationship between sacred and profane and to use this as a criterion of religion is to beg the question of whether Confucianism can count as a religious tradition."</ref>

Confucius regarded himself as a transmitter of cultural values from the preceding Xia, Shang, and Western Zhou dynasties.{{sfnb|Fung|2008|p=163}} Suppressed during the [[Legalism (Chinese philosophy)|Legalist]] [[Qin dynasty|Qin]] dynasty (c. 200 BCE), Confucianism flourished under the [[Han dynasty]] (c. 130 BCE), displacing the proto-Taoist [[Huang–Lao]] tradition to become the dominant ideological framework, while blending with the pragmatic teachings of Legalism.<ref name="Lin">{{Cite book |last=Lin |first=Justin Yifu |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rxzJoskK_rwC |title=Demystifying the Chinese Economy |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2012 |isbn=978-0-521-19180-7 |page=107}}</ref> The [[Tang dynasty]] (c. 600 CE) witnessed a response to the rising influence of [[Buddhism]] and [[Taoism]] in the development of [[Neo-Confucianism]], a reformulated philosophical system that became central to the [[Imperial examination|imperial examination system]] and the scholar-official class of the [[Song dynasty]] (c. 1000 CE).

The abolition of the imperial examination system in 1905 marked the decline of state-endorsed Confucianism. In the early 20th century, [[New Culture Movement|Chinese reformers]] came to associate Confucianism with China's "[[Century of humiliation|Century of Humiliation]]", and instead embraced alternative ideologies such as Sun Yat-sen's "[[Three Principles of the People]]" and later [[Maoism]]. Nevertheless, Confucianism endured as a cultural force, influencing East Asian economic and social structures into the modern era. Confucian work ethic was credited with the rise of the [[Economy of East Asia|East Asian economy]] in the late twentieth century.<ref name="Lin" />

Confucianism remains influential in [[China]], [[Korea]], [[Japan]], [[Vietnam]], and regions with significant [[Overseas Chinese|Chinese diaspora]].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Kaplan |first=Robert D. |date=6 February 2015 |title=Asia's Rise Is Rooted in Confucian Values |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/asias-rise-is-rooted-in-confucian-values-1423254759 |work=The Wall Street Journal}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Tucker |first=Mary Evelyn |author-link=Mary Evelyn Tucker |date=1998 |title=Confucianism and Ecology: Potential and Limits |url=https://fore.yale.edu/Publications/Books/Religions-World-and-Ecology-Book-Series/Confucianism-Table-Contents/Confucianism |access-date=2023-04-29 |website=The Forum on Religion and Ecology at Yale |publisher=[[Yale University]]}}</ref> A modern Confucian revival has gained momentum in academic and cultural circles, culminating in the establishment of a national [[Confucian church|Confucian Church]] in China in 2015, reflecting renewed interest in Confucian ideals as a foundation for social and moral values.<ref>{{multiref2|{{cite book|editor1=Benjamin Elman|editor2=John Duncan |editor3= Herman Ooms |title=Rethinking Confucianism: Past and Present in China, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam|place=Los Angeles|publisher =UCLA Asia Pacific Center |isbn= 1883191076 |series=UCLA Asian Pacific Monograph Series|date= 2002}}{{page needed|date=December 2024}}|{{cite book|last=Yu|first= Yingshi|author-mask =Yu Yingshi | author-link= Yu Ying-shih|title=Xiandai Ruxue Lun | script-title=zh:現代儒學論 | trans-title= Discourses on Modern Confucianism | place= [[River Edge, New Jersey|River Edge]]|publisher =Global Publishing |date=1996| isbn=9789813204232|language =zh}}
}}</ref>{{sfnb|Billioud|Thoraval|2015|loc=''passim''}}

American philosopher [[Herbert Fingarette]] describes Confucianism as a philosophical system which regards "the secular as sacred".{{sfnb|Fingarette|1972}}

==Terminology==
{{multiple image
| align = right
| width = 100
| image1 = ACC-L30678.svg
| caption1 = [[Large seal script|Large seal]]
| image2 = ACC-s05667.svg
| caption2 = [[Small seal script|Small seal]]
| footer = Older versions of the grapheme {{zhi|c=儒|p=rú|l=scholar, refined one, Confucian, traditionalist}}: it is composed of {{zhi|c=人|p=rén|l=person}} and {{zhi|c=需|p=xū|l=to await}}, itself composed of {{zhi|c=雨|p=yǔ|l=rain, instruction}} and {{zhi|c=而|p=ér|l=sky}}. According to [[Kang Youwei]], [[Hu Shih]], and [[Xinzhong Yao|Yao Xinzhong]], they were the official shaman-priests (''[[wu (shaman)|wu]]'') experts in rites and astronomy of the Shang, and later Zhou, dynasty.{{sfnb|Yao|2000|p=19}}
}}
There is no term in Chinese which directly corresponds to "Confucianism". The closest catch-all term for Confucianism is the word {{zhp|c=儒|p=rú}}. Its literal meanings in modern Chinese include 'scholar', 'learned', or 'refined man'. In [[Old Chinese]] the word had a distinct set of meanings, including 'to tame', 'to mould', 'to educate', and 'to refine'.<ref name="Eno">{{Cite book |last=Eno |first=Robert |title=The Confucian Creation of Heaven: Philosophy and the Defense of Ritual Mastery |publisher=State University of New York Press |year=1990 |isbn=978-0-7914-0191-0 |edition=1st}}</ref>{{rp|190–197}} Several different terms, some of which with modern origin, are used in different situations to express different facets of Confucianism, including:
* {{zhi|c={{linktext|儒家}}|p=Rújiā}} – "the {{tlit|zh|pinyin|ru}} school of thought";
* {{zhi|c={{linktext|儒教}}|p=Rújiào}} – "{{tlit|zh|pinyin|ru}} religious doctrine";
* {{zhi|t={{linktext|儒學}}|s={{linktext|儒学}}|p=Rúxué}} – "{{tlit|zh|pinyin|ru}} studies";
* {{zhi|c={{linktext|孔教}}|p=Kǒngjiào}} – "Confucius's religious doctrine";
* {{zhi|c={{linktext|孔家店}}|p=Kǒngjiādiàn}} – "Confucius's family's business", a pejorative phrase used during the [[New Culture Movement]] and the [[Cultural Revolution]].

The terms that use {{tlit|zh|pinyin|ru}} do not use the name "Confucius" at all, but instead focus on the ideal of the Confucian man. The use of the term "Confucianism" has been avoided by some modern scholars, who favor "Ruism" and "Ruists" instead. Robert Eno argues that the term has been "burdened{{nbsp}}... with the ambiguities and irrelevant traditional associations". Ruism, as he states, is more faithful to the original Chinese name for the school.<ref name=Eno/>{{rp|7}}

The term "Traditionalist" has been suggested by David Schaberg to emphasize the connection to the past, its standards, and inherited forms, in which Confucius himself placed so much importance.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Schaberg |first=David |author-link=David Schaberg |year=1997 |title=Remonstrance in Eastern Zhou History |journal=Early China |publisher=Cambridge University Press |volume=22 |pages=130–179 at '''138''' |doi=10.1017/S0362502800003266 |jstor=23354245 |s2cid=163038164}}</ref> This translation of the word {{tlit|zh|pinyin|ru}} is followed by e.g. Yuri Pines.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Pines |first=Yuri |author-link=Yuri Pines |year=2005–2006 |title=Biases and Their Sources: Qin History in the "Shiji" |journal=Oriens Extremus |publisher=Harrassowitz Verlag |volume=45 |pages=10–34 at '''30''' |jstor=24047638}}</ref>

According to [[Zhou Youguang]], {{tlit|zh|pinyin|ru}} originally referred to shamanic methods of holding rites and existed before Confucius's times, but with Confucius it came to mean devotion to propagating such teachings to bring civilisation to the people.

In the Western world, the [[Radical 85|character for water]] is often used as a symbol for Confucianism, which is not the case in modern China.{{Citation needed|date=May 2023}}

===Five Classics and the Confucian vision===
[[File:Confucius, fresco from a Western Han tomb of Dongping County, Shandong province, China.jpg|thumb|[[Confucius]] in a fresco from a [[Western Han]] tomb in [[Dongping County|Dongping]], [[Shandong]]]]
Traditionally, Confucius was thought to be the author or editor of the [[Four Books and Five Classics|Five Classics]] which were the basic texts of Confucianism, all edited into their received versions around 500 years later by Imperial Librarian [[Liu Xin (scholar)|Liu Xin]].<ref>{{ cite journal
| last = Nylan | first = Michael
| title= "Empire" in the Classical Era in China (304 BC–AD 316)
| journal= Oriens Extremus
| volume= 46 | year = 2007 | pages = 48–83
| publisher= Harrassowitz Verlag
| jstor =24047664
}}</ref>{{rp|51}} The scholar [[Xinzhong Yao|Yao Xinzhong]] allows that there are good reasons to believe that Confucian classics took shape in the hands of Confucius, but that "nothing can be taken for granted in the matter of the early versions of the classics". The sixth classic similar to the [[Classic of Poetry]] was the [[Classic of Music]]. It was lost during the [[Han dynasty]]. Music carried an invaluable tool to induce focus in performing rituals.<ref>{{Cite journal|title=Who said there was a ''Classic of Music''?|last=Waring|first=Luke|journal= Early China| doi=10.1017/eac.2022.3 |publisher= Cambridge University Press| pages= 467–514 | date=2022 | volume=45}}</ref> These were the internal (music) and external (rites) keys to harmonizing society.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Garrison|first=James|title=The Social Value of Ritual and Music in Classical Chinese Thought|jstor=43046966|date=August 2012|journal=Teorema | volume=31 | number=3 | pages= 209–222}}</ref> Yao suggests that most modern scholars hold the "pragmatic" view that Confucius and his followers did not intend to create a system of classics, but nonetheless "contributed to their formation".{{sfnb|Yao|2000|pp=52–54}}

The scholar [[Tu Weiming]] explains these classics as embodying "five visions" which underlie the development of Confucianism:
* ''[[I Ching]]'' (''Classic of Change'' or ''Book of Changes''), generally held to be the earliest of the classics, shows a metaphysical vision which combines divinatory art with numerological technique and ethical insight; philosophy of change sees cosmos as interaction between the two energies yin and yang; universe always shows organismic unity and dynamism.
* ''[[Classic of Poetry]]'' or ''Book of Songs'' is the earliest anthology of [[Chinese poetry|Chinese poems]] and songs, with the earliest strata antedating the Zhou conquest. It shows the poetic vision in the belief that poetry and music convey common human feelings and mutual responsiveness.
* ''[[Book of Documents]]'' or ''Book of History'' is a compilation of speeches of major figures and records of events in ancient times, embodying the political vision and addressing the kingly way in terms of the ethical foundation for humane government. The documents show the sagacity, filial piety, and work ethic of mythical sage-emperors Yao, Shun, and Yu, who established a political culture which was based on responsibility and trust. Their virtue formed a covenant of social harmony which did not depend on punishment or coercion. 
* ''[[Book of Rites]]'' describes the social forms, administration, and ceremonial rites of the Zhou dynasty. This social vision defined society not as an adversarial system based on contractual relations but as a network of kinship groups bound by cultural identity and ritual practice, socially responsible for one another and the transmission of proper antique forms. The [[Four occupations|four functional occupations]] are cooperative (farmer, scholar, artisan, merchant).
* ''[[Spring and Autumn Annals]]'' chronicles the period to which it gives its name, [[Spring and Autumn period]] (771–481&nbsp;BC), from the perspective of Confucius's home state of [[Lu (state)|Lu]]. These events emphasise the significance of collective memory for communal self-identification, for reanimating the old is the best way to attain the new.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Tu |first=Weiming | author-link=Tu Weiming | author-mask= Tu Weiming |title=The Heritage of China: Contemporary Perspectives on Chinese Civilization |publisher=University of California Press |year=1990 |isbn=978-0-520-06441-6 |editor-last=Ropp |editor-first=Paul S. |chapter=Confucian Tradition in Chinese History |editor-last2=Barrett |editor-first2=Timothy Hugh| page=113}}</ref>

==Doctrines==

===Theory and theology===
[[File:天-oracle.svg|upright|thumb|[[Zhou dynasty]] [[oracle bone script|oracular]] version of the grapheme for {{tlit|zh|pinyin|Tian}}, representing a man with a head informed by the north [[celestial pole]]{{sfnb|Didier|2009|loc=''passim'' and p. 3, Vol. III, for the graphic interpretation of the character}}]]
{{Main|Confucian theology}}
{{Further|Religious Confucianism|Zhou dynasty#Philosophy}}
Confucianism revolves around the pursuit of the unity of the individual self and {{tlit|zh|pinyin|[[tian]]}} ("heaven"), or the relationship between humanity and heaven.{{sfnb|Adler|2014|p=10}}{{sfnb|Tay|2010|p=100}} The principle or way of Heaven ({{tlit|zh|pinyin|tian [[Li (Neo-Confucianism)|li]]}} or {{tlit|zh|pinyin|tian [[tao]]}}) is the order of the world and the source of divine authority.{{sfnb|Tay|2010|p=100}} {{tlit|zh|pinyin|Tian li}} or {{tlit|zh|pinyin|tian tao}} is [[monism|monistic]], meaning that it is singular and indivisible. Individuals may realise their humanity and become one with Heaven through the contemplation of such order.{{sfnb|Tay|2010|p=100}} This transformation of the self is extended to family and society to create a harmonious community.{{sfnb|Tay|2010|p=100}} Joël Thoraval studied Confucianism as a diffused [[civil religion]] in contemporary China, finding that it expresses itself in the widespread worship of five cosmological entities: Heaven and Earth ({{zhi|c=地|p=[[Di (Chinese concept)|dì]]}}), the sovereign or the government ({{zhi|c=君|p=jūn}}), ancestors ({{zhi|t=親|p=qīn}}), and masters ({{zhi|c=師|p=shī}}).<ref>{{Cite news |last=Thoraval |first=Joël |year=2016 |title=Heaven, Earth, Sovereign, Ancestors, Masters: Some Remarks on the Politico-Religious in China Today |publisher=Centre for Studies on China, Korea and Japan |issue=5 |location=Paris |url=https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01374321/document |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180116171349/https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01374321/document |archive-date=16 January 2018 |series=Occasional Papers}}</ref>

According to the scholar [[Stephan Feuchtwang]], in Chinese cosmology, which is not merely Confucian but shared by many [[Chinese folk religion|Chinese religions]], "the universe creates itself out of a primary chaos of material energy" ({{tlit|zh|pinyin|[[hundun]]}} and {{tlit|zh|pinyin|[[qi]]}}), and is organized through the polarity of [[yin and yang]] that characterises any thing and life. Creation is therefore a continuous ordering; it is not creation {{lang|la|[[creatio ex nihilo|ex nihilo]].}} "Yin and yang are the invisible and visible, the receptive and the active, the unshaped and the shaped; they characterise the yearly cycle (winter and summer), the landscape (shady and bright), the sexes (female and male), and even sociopolitical history (disorder and order). Confucianism is concerned with finding "middle ways" between yin and yang at every new configuration of the world."{{sfnb|Feuchtwang|2016|pp=146–150}}

Confucianism conciliates both the inner and outer polarities of spiritual cultivation—that is to say [[self-cultivation]] and world redemption—in the ideal of "sageliness within and kingliness without".{{sfnb|Tay|2010|p=100}} {{tlit|zh|pinyin|[[Ren (philosophy)|Ren]]}}, translated as "humaneness" or the essence proper of a human being, is the character of compassionate mind; it is the virtue endowed by Heaven and at the same time the means by which a person may achieve oneness with Heaven by  comprehending their origin in Heaven, and therefore divine essence.  In his work ''The Book of [[Great Unity]]'' ({{lang|zh|大同書}}), late [[Qing dynasty]] reformer [[Kang Youwei]] considered {{tlit|zh|pinyin|ren}} as the means "to form one body with all things" and one can find {{tlit|zh|pinyin|ren}} "when the self and others are not separated... and when compassion is aroused".{{sfnb|Tay|2010|p=102}}

"Lord Heaven" and "[[Jade Emperor]]" were terms for a Confucianist [[King of the gods|supreme deity]] who was an [[anthropomorphized]] {{tlit|zh|pinyin|tian}},<ref name=":10026">{{Cite book |title=World Religions: Eastern Traditions |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |year=2002 |isbn=0-19-541521-3 |editor-last=Oxtoby |editor-first=Willard Gurdon |edition=2nd |location=Don Mills, Ontario |pages=326, 393, 401 |oclc=46661540}}</ref> and some conceptions of it thought of the two names as synonymous.

====''Tian'' and the gods====
{{Main|Tian}}
[[File:Precessional north pole (Běijí 北极) in α Ursae Minoris, drawing a wàn 卍 in the four phases of time.svg|thumb|Like other symbols such as the ''[[sauwastika]]'',{{sfnb|Didier|2009|p=256, Vol. III}} {{zhi|out=c|p=wàn|c=卍|l=all things}} in Chinese, the [[Mesopotamia]]n {{tlit|akk|[[dingir]]}} or {{tlit|akk|[[anu]]}} {{langx|akk|𒀭𒀭|label=none}},<ref>{{Cite book |last=Mair |first=Victor H. |author-link=Victor H. Mair |title=Dynamics in the History of Religions between Asia and Europe: Encounters, Notions, and Comparative Perspectives |publisher=Brill |year=2011 |isbn=978-90-04-22535-0 |editor-last=Krech |editor-first=Volkhard |location=Leiden |pages=85–110 |chapter=Religious Formations and Intercultural Contacts in Early China |doi=10.1163/9789004225350_005 |editor-last2=Steinicke |editor-first2=Marion}} pp. 97–98, note 26.</ref> and also the Chinese {{zhi|c=巫|p=[[wu (shaman)|wu]]|l=shaman}} (in [[Shang dynasty|Shang]] script represented by a graph resembling the [[cross potent]] ☩),{{sfnb|Didier|2009|p=257, Vol. I}} {{tlit|zh|pinyin|Tian}} refers to the northern [[celestial pole]] ({{zhi|c=北極|p=běijí}}), the pivot and the vault of the sky with its spinning constellations.{{sfnb|Didier|2009|loc=''passim''}} Here is an approximate representation of the {{zhp|p=tiānmén|c=天門|l=gate of heaven}}.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Reiter |first=Florian C. |title=Purposes, Means and Convictions in Daoism: A Berlin Symposium |publisher=Otto Harrassowitz Verlag |year=2007 |isbn=978-3-447-05513-0 |page=190}}</ref> or {{zhp|p=tiānshū|t=天樞|l=pivot of heaven}}<ref>{{Cite book |last=Milburn |first=Olivia |author-link=Olivia Milburn |title=The Spring and Autumn Annals of Master Yan |publisher=Brill |year=2016 |isbn=978-90-04-30966-1 |series=Sinica Leidensia, vol. 128 | doi=10.1163/9789004309661 |page= 343, n. 17}}</ref> as the precessional north celestial pole, with [[Polaris|α Ursae Minoris]] as the [[pole star]], with the spinning [[Big Dipper|Chariot]] constellations in the four phases of time. According to Reza Assasi's theories, the {{lang|zh-hant|卍}} may not only be centred in the current precessional pole at α Ursae Minoris, but also very near to the north [[orbital pole|ecliptic pole]] if [[Draco (constellation)|Draco]] ({{zhi|p=Tiānlóng|s=天龙|t=天龍}}) is conceived as one of its two beams.<ref>{{Cite conference |last=Assasi |first=Reza |year=2013 |title=Swastika: The Forgotten Constellation Representing the Chariot of Mithras |url=https://www.academia.edu/4087681 |journal=Anthropological Notebooks |type=Supplement |editor-last1=Šprajc |editor-first1=Ivan |editor-last2=Pehani |editor-first2=Peter |book-title=Ancient Cosmologies and Modern Prophets: Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the European Society for Astronomy in Culture |volume=XIX |issn=1408-032X |number=2}}</ref>{{refn|group=note|Whether centred in the change-ful precessional north [[celestial pole]] or in the fixed north [[orbital pole|ecliptic pole]], the spinning constellations draw the {{lang|zh-hant|卍}} symbol around the centre.}}]]

{{tlit|zh|pinyin|Tian}}, a key concept in Chinese thought, refers to the God of Heaven, the [[celestial pole|northern culmen of the skies]] and its spinning stars,{{sfnb|Didier|2009|loc=''passim''}} earthly nature and its laws which come from Heaven, to 'Heaven and Earth' (that is, "all things"), and to the awe-inspiring forces beyond human control.<ref name="Hagen">{{Cite web |last=Hagen |first=Kurtis |title=Confucian Key Terms – Tian 天 |url=http://faculty.plattsburgh.edu/kurtis.hagen/keyterms_tian.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141203164801/http://faculty.plattsburgh.edu/kurtis.hagen/keyterms_tian.html |archive-date=3 December 2014 |publisher=State University of New York at Plattsburgh}}</ref> There are so many uses in Chinese thought that it is impossible to give a single English translation.{{sfnb|Littlejohn|2010|p=35}}

Confucius used the term in a mystical way.{{sfnb|Hsu|2014}} He wrote in the ''[[Analects]]'' (7.23) that {{tlit|zh|pinyin|tian}} gave him life, and that {{tlit|zh|pinyin|tian}} watched and judged (6.28; 9.12). In 9.5 Confucius says that a person may know the movements of {{tlit|zh|pinyin|tian}}, and this provides with the sense of having a special place in the universe. In 17.19 Confucius says that {{tlit|zh|pinyin|tian}} spoke to him, though not in words. The scholar Ronnie Littlejohn warns that {{tlit|zh|pinyin|tian}} was not to be interpreted as a [[personal god]] comparable to that of the Abrahamic faiths, in the sense of an otherworldly or transcendent creator.{{sfnb|Littlejohn|2010|pp=35–36}} Rather it is similar to what [[Taoists]] meant by {{tlit|zh|pinyin|Dao}}: "the way things are" or "the regularities of the world",<ref name=Hagen/> which Stephan Feuchtwang equates with the ancient Greek concept of ''[[physis]]'', "nature" as the generation and regenerations of things and of the moral order.{{sfnb|Feuchtwang|2016|p=146}} {{tlit|zh|pinyin|Tian}} may also be compared to the ''[[Brahman]]'' of [[Hinduism|Hindu]] and [[Veda|Vedic]] traditions.{{sfnb|Adler|2014|p=10}} The scholar Promise Hsu, in the wake of Robert B. Louden, explained 17:19 ("What does {{tlit|zh|pinyin|Tian}} ever say? Yet there are four seasons going round and there are the hundred things coming into being. What does {{tlit|zh|pinyin|Tian}} say?") as implying that even though {{tlit|zh|pinyin|Tian}} is not a "speaking person", it constantly "does" through the rhythms of nature, and communicates "how human beings ought to live and act", at least to those who have learnt to carefully listen to it.{{sfnb|Hsu|2014}}

[[Duanmu Ci]], a disciple of Confucius, said that {{tlit|zh|pinyin|Tian}} had set the master on the path to become a wise man (9.6). In 7.23 Confucius says that he has no doubt left that {{tlit|zh|pinyin|Tian}} gave him life, and from it he had developed right virtue ({{tlit|zh|pinyin|[[De (Chinese)|de]]}}). In 8.19, he says that the lives of the sages are interwoven with {{tlit|zh|pinyin|Tian}}.{{sfnb|Littlejohn|2010|p=35}}

Regarding personal gods ({{tlit|zh|pinyin|[[shen (Chinese religion)|shen]]}}, energies who emanate from and reproduce {{tlit|zh|pinyin|Tian}}) enliving nature, in the ''Analects'' Confucius says that it is appropriate ({{tlit|zh|pinyin|[[Yi (philosophy)|yi]]}}) for people to worship ({{lang-zh|labels=no|c=敬|p=jìng}}) them,{{sfnb|Littlejohn|2010|p=36}} although only through proper rites ({{tlit|zh|pinyin|[[Li (Confucianism)|li]]}}), implying respect of positions and discretion.{{sfnb|Littlejohn|2010|p=36}} Confucius himself was a ritual and [[sacrifice|sacrificial]] master.{{sfnb|Littlejohn|2010|p=37}}

Answering to a disciple who asked whether it is better to sacrifice to the god of the stove or to the god of the family (a popular saying), in 3.13 Confucius says that in order to appropriately pray to gods, one should first know and respect Heaven. In 3.12, he explains that religious rituals produce meaningful experiences,{{sfnb|Littlejohn|2010|pp=36–37}} and one has to offer sacrifices in person, acting in presence, otherwise "it is the same as not having sacrificed at all". Rites and sacrifices to the gods have an ethical importance: they generate good life, because taking part in them leads to the overcoming of the self.{{sfnb|Shen|Shun|2007|pp=278–279}} Analects 10.11 tells that Confucius always took a small part of his food and placed it on the sacrificial bowls as an offering to his [[ancestor]]s.{{sfnb|Littlejohn|2010|p=37}}

Some Confucian movements worship Confucius,<ref>{{Cite web |last=Chuarsa |first=Ira |date=2017-11-14 |title=The Invention of Indonesian Confucianism |url=https://crcs.ugm.ac.id/the-invention-of-indonesian-confucianism/ |access-date=2023-04-30 |website=Program Studi Agama dan Lintas Budaya Center for Religious and Cross-cultural Studies Graduate School, Universitas Gadjah Mada |publisher=[[Gadjah Mada University]] |language=en-US}}</ref> although not as a supreme being or anything else approaching the power of {{tlit|zh|pinyin|tian}} or the {{tlit|zh|pinyin|[[tao]]}}, and/or gods from [[Chinese folk religion]]. These movements are not a part of mainstream Confucianism, although the boundary between Chinese folk religion and Confucianism can be blurred.{{Citation needed|date=April 2023}}

Other movements, such as [[Mohism]] which was later absorbed by Taoism, developed a more [[theism|theistic]] idea of Heaven.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Dubs |first=Homer| author-link =Homer H. Dubs |year=1960 |title=Theism and Naturalism in Ancient Chinese Philosophy |journal=Philosophy East and West |publisher=University of Hawaii Press |volume=9 |pages=163–172 |doi=10.2307/1397096 |jstor=1397096 |number=3–4}}</ref> Feuchtwang explains that the difference between Confucianism and Taoism primarily lies in the fact that the former focuses on the realisation of the starry order of Heaven in human society, while the latter on the contemplation of the Dao which spontaneously arises in nature.{{sfnb|Feuchtwang|2016|p=146}} However, Confucianism does venerate many aspects of nature<ref name=":0" /> and also respects various {{tlit|zh|pinyin|tao}},<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia |title=Dao |encyclopedia=[[Encyclopedia Britannica]] |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/dao |access-date=2023-04-30 |last=Stefon |first=Matt |date=2012 |language=en}}{{pb}}{{Cite journal |last=Wong |first=Pak-Hang |date=2012-03-01 |title=Dao, Harmony and Personhood: Towards a Confucian Ethics of Technology  |journal=Philosophy & Technology |language=en |volume=25 |issue=1 |pages=68–71, 76–78, 80–81 |doi=10.1007/s13347-011-0021-z |s2cid=256085508 |issn=2210-5441 |via=[[Springer Science+Business Media|SpringerLink]]|doi-access=free |url=https://research.utwente.nl/files/6594266/Wong_10.1007_s13347-011-0021-z.pdf }}</ref> as well as what Confucius saw as the main {{tlit|zh|pinyin|tao}}, the "{{bracket|Way}} of Heaven."<ref name=":1" />

The Way of Heaven involves "lifelong and sincere devotion to traditional cultural forms" and {{tlit|zh|pinyin|[[wu wei]]}}, "a state of spontaneous harmony between individual inclinations and the sacred Way".<ref name=":1" />

[[Kelly James Clark]] argued that Confucius himself saw {{tlit|zh|pinyin|Tian}} as an anthropomorphic god that Clark hypothetically refers to as "Heavenly Supreme Emperor", although most other scholars on Confucianism disagree with this view.<ref name=":03">{{Cite book |title=Classical Theism: New Essays on the Metaphysics of God |date=2023 |publisher=[[Routledge]] |isbn=978-1-000-83688-2 |editor-last=Jonathan Fuqua |chapter=Searching for the Ineffable: Classical Theism and Eastern Thought about God<!-- pageno unknown -- info is from the e-book--> |oclc=1353836889 |editor-last2=Robert C. Koons}}</ref>

===Social morality and ethics===
{{further|Three Fundamental Bonds and Five Constant Virtues}}
<!--"Five precepts" links here. Please adjust link if this subsection is removed or renamed. Thanks.-->
[[File:张挥公大殿.jpg|thumb|Worship at the Great Temple of Lord Zhang Hui ({{zhi|s=张挥公大殿|p=Zhāng Huī gōng dàdiàn}}), the cathedral [[ancestral shrine]] of the [[Zhang (surname)|Zhang]] lineage corporation, at their [[ancestral home (Chinese)|ancestral home]] in [[Qinghe County, Hebei|Qinghe]], [[Hebei]]]]
[[File:Mazhan Zhen - Houxian Cun - P1220012.JPG|thumb|Ancestral temple of the [[Zeng]] lineage and Houxian village cultural centre, [[Cangnan County|Cangnan]], [[Zhejiang]]]]
As explained by Stephan Feuchtwang, the order coming from Heaven preserves the world, and has to be followed by humanity finding a "middle way" between yin and yang forces in each new configuration of reality. Social harmony or morality is identified as patriarchy, which is expressed in the worship of ancestors and deified progenitors in the male line, at [[ancestral shrines]].{{sfnb|Feuchtwang|2016|p=146}}

Confucian ethical codes are described as humanistic.<ref name=Juergensmeyer/> They may be practiced by all the members of a society. Confucian ethics is characterised by the promotion of virtues, encompassed by the [[Three Fundamental Bonds and Five Constant Virtues|Five Constants]], elaborated by Confucian scholars out of the inherited tradition during the [[Han dynasty]].<ref name="Runes">{{Cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/dictionaryofphil0000unse/page/338 |title=Dictionary of Philosophy |publisher=Philosophical Library |year=1983 |isbn=978-0-8022-2388-3 |editor-last=Runes |editor-first=Dagobert D. |page=[https://archive.org/details/dictionaryofphil0000unse/page/338 338]}}</ref> The Five Constants are:<ref name=Runes/>
* ''[[Ren (Confucianism)|Ren]]'' (benevolence, humaneness)
* ''[[Yi (philosophy)|Yi]]'' (righteousness, justice)
* ''[[Li (Confucianism)|Li]]'' (propriety, rites)
* ''Zhi'' ({{zhi|c={{linktext|智}}|p=zhì}}: wisdom, knowledge)
* ''[[Xin (virtue)|Xin]]'' (sincerity, faithfulness)

These are accompanied by the classical four virtues ({{zhi|s=四字|p=sìzì}}), one of which (''Yi'') is also included among the Five Constants:
* ''Yi'' (see above)
* [[Loyalty]] ({{lang-zh|labels=no|c=忠|p=zhōng}})
* [[Filial piety]] ({{lang-zh|labels=no|c=孝|p=xiào}})
* {{linktext|Continence}} ({{lang-zh|labels=no|t={{linktext|節}}|s={{linktext|节}}|p=jié}})

There are many other traditionally Confucian values, such as {{zhl|s={{linktext|诚}}|p=chéng|l=honesty}}, {{zhl|c={{linktext|勇}}|p=yǒng|l=bravery}}, {{zhl|c={{linktext|廉}}|p=lián|l=incorruptibility}}, {{zhl|c={{linktext|恕}}|p=shù|l=kindness, forgiveness}}, a {{zhl|s={{linktext|耻}}|p=chǐ|l=sense of right and wrong}}, {{zhl|s={{linktext|温}}|p=wēn|l=gentleness}}, {{zhl|c={{linktext|良}}|p=liáng|l=kindheartenedness}}, {{zhl|c={{linktext|恭}}|p=gōng|l=respect}}, {{zhl|s={{linktext|俭}}|p=jiǎn|l=frugality}}, and {{zhl|s={{linktext|让}}|p=ràng|l=modesty}}).

====Ren====
{{Main|Ren (Confucianism)}}
''Ren (仁 )'' is the highest Confucian virtue meaning the good quality of a virtuous human when reaching for higher ideals or when being [[altruistic]]. According to [[Confucius]], ''Ren'' encompasses benevolence, trustworthiness, courage, compassion, empathy, and reciprocity. It is considered the essence of the human being endowed by Heaven, and the means by which someone may act according to the principle of Heaven and become one with it.{{sfnb|Tay|2010|p=102}}

''Ren'' is expressed through interpersonal relationships and can be cultivated through the observance of proper ''Li''. ''Li'', or ritual, guides people's behaviors in nurturing and expressing ''Ren. Li'' regulates the fundamental human relationships between parents and kids, spouses, siblings, friends, and set the foundation to a harmonious society. [[Yan Hui (disciple of Confucius)|Yan Hui]], Confucius's most outstanding student, once asked his master to describe the criteria of R''en''. Confucius replied, "If contrary to ritual, do not look; if contrary to ritual, do not listen; if contrary to ritual, do not speak; if contrary to ritual, do not act." {{sfn|Gardner|2014|p=28}}

''Ren'' is also a central principle in Confucian political theory: a ruler with the Mandate of Heaven is one of great virtue, who leads by moral example and prioritizes the well-being of the people.

====Rite and centring====
[[File:孔庙 祭孔大典 2.jpg|thumb|Confucian ritual ceremony held at [[Temple of Confucius, Qufu|Qufu Confucius temple]] in [[Shandong]], China.]]
[[File:Korean Confucianism-Chugyedaeje-02.jpg|thumb|[[Korean Confucianism|Korean Confucian]] rite in [[Jeju Province|Jeju]]]]
{{Main|Li (Confucianism)}}
''Li'' ({{lang-zh|labels=no|t=禮|s=礼}}) is a word which finds its most extensive use in [[Confucian]] and post-Confucian [[Chinese philosophy]]. ''[[Li (Confucianism)|Li]]'' can be translated as '[[Ritual|rite]]' or ritual, when referring to its realization in the context of human social behavior it has also been translated as '[[convention (norm)|customs]]', 'measures' and 'rules', among other terms. ''Li'' also means religious rites which establish relations between humanity and the gods.

According to Stephan Feuchtwang, rites are conceived as "what makes the invisible visible", making possible for humans to cultivate the underlying order of nature. Correctly performed rituals move society in alignment with earthly and heavenly (astral) forces, establishing the harmony of the three realms—Heaven, Earth and humanity. This practice is defined as "centering" ({{zhi|c=央|p=yāng}} or {{zhi|c=中|p=zhōng}}). Among all things of creation, humans themselves are "central" because they have the ability to cultivate and centre natural forces.{{sfnb|Feuchtwang|2016|p=150}}
[[File:禮俗不可廢.jpg|thumb|Confucian rite held at Teachers' Day in Taiwan.]]
''Li'' embodies the entire web of interaction between humanity, human objects, and nature. Confucius includes in his discussions of ''li'' such diverse topics as learning, tea drinking, titles, mourning, and governance. [[Xunzi (philosopher)|Xunzi]] cites "songs and laughter, weeping and lamentation{{nbsp}}... rice and millet, fish and meat{{nbsp}}... the wearing of ceremonial caps, embroidered robes, and patterned silks, or of fasting clothes and mourning clothes{{nbsp}}... spacious rooms and secluded halls, soft mats, couches and benches" as vital parts of the fabric of ''li''.

Confucius envisioned proper government being guided by the principles of ''li''. Some Confucians proposed that all human beings may pursue perfection by learning and practising ''li''. Overall, Confucians believe that governments should place more emphasis on ''li'' and rely much less on penal punishment when they govern.

====Loyalty====
Loyalty ({{zhi|c=忠|p=zhōng}}) is particularly relevant for the social class to which most of Confucius's students belonged, because the most important way for an ambitious young scholar to become a prominent official was to enter a ruler's civil service.

Confucius himself did not propose that "might makes right", but rather that a superior should be obeyed because of his moral rectitude. In addition, loyalty does not mean subservience to authority. This is because reciprocity is demanded from the superior as well. As Confucius stated "a prince should employ his minister according to the rules of propriety; ministers should serve their prince with faithfulness (loyalty)."<ref>{{Cite book |chapter-url=http://ctext.org/analects/ba-yi |title=The Analects |chapter= Ba Yi |via=Chinese Text Project}}</ref>

Similarly, [[Mencius]] also said that "when the prince regards his ministers as his hands and feet, his ministers regard their prince as their belly and heart; when he regards them as his dogs and horses, they regard him as another man; when he regards them as the ground or as grass, they regard him as a robber and an enemy."<ref>{{Cite book |chapter-url=http://ctext.org/mengzi/li-lou-ii |title=Mengzi |chapter= Li Lou II |via=Chinese Text Project}}</ref> Moreover, Mencius indicated that if the ruler is incompetent, he should be replaced. If the ruler is evil, then the people have the right to overthrow him.<ref>{{Cite book |chapter-url=http://ctext.org/mengzi/liang-hui-wang-ii/zh?en=on |chapter=Liang Hui Wang xia |via=中國哲學書電子化計劃 (ctext.org)|title=孟子 |language=zh,en |script-chapter=zh:梁惠王下 }}</ref> A good Confucian is also expected to remonstrate with his superiors when necessary.<ref>{{Cite book |chapter-url=http://ctext.org/analects/xian-wen/zh?en=on |chapter=Xian Wen |via=中國哲學書電子化計劃 (ctext.org) |title=論語 |language=zh,en |script-chapter=zh:憲問}}</ref> At the same time, a proper Confucian ruler should also accept his ministers' advice, as this will help him govern the realm better.

In later ages, however, emphasis was often placed more on the obligations of the ruled to the ruler, and less on the ruler's obligations to the ruled. Like filial piety, loyalty was often subverted by the autocratic regimes in China. Nonetheless, throughout the ages, many Confucians continued to fight against unrighteous superiors and rulers. Many of these Confucians suffered and sometimes died because of their conviction and action.<ref>Example: [[Hai Rui]] in the Ming dynasty, [[Yuan Chang (official)]] in the Qing, and so forth.</ref> During the Ming-Qing era, prominent Confucians such as [[Wang Yangming]] promoted individuality and independent thinking as a counterweight to subservience to authority.<ref>Wang Yangming, Instructions for Practical Living and Other Neo-Confucian Writings by Wang Yang-Ming, Wing-tsit Chan tran. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1963), 159.</ref> The famous thinker Huang Zongxi also strongly criticised the autocratic nature of the imperial system and wanted to keep imperial power in check.<ref>William Theodore De Bary, Waiting for the Dawn: A Plan for the Prince (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), 91–110.</ref>

Many Confucians also realised that loyalty and filial piety have the potential of coming into conflict with one another. This may be true especially in times of social chaos, such as during the period of the [[Transition from Ming to Qing|Ming-Qing transition]].<ref>See the discussion in {{lang|zh-hant|何冠彪}} He Guanbiao, {{lang|zh-hant|生與死 : 明季士大夫的抉擇}} (Taipei: Lianjing Chuban Shiye Gongsi, 1997).</ref>

====Filial piety====
[[File:尝粪心忧.JPG|thumb|Fourteenth of ''[[The Twenty-four Filial Exemplars]]'']]
{{Main|Filial piety}}
In Confucian philosophy, {{zht|c=孝|p=xiào|tr=filial piety}} is a virtue of respect for one's parents and ancestors, and of the hierarchies within society: father–son, elder–junior and male–female.{{sfnb|Feuchtwang|2016|p=146}} The Confucian classic ''[[Classic of Filial Piety|Xiaojing]]'' ("Book of Piety"), thought to be written during the Qin or Han dynasties, has historically been the authoritative source on the Confucian tenet of ''xiao''. The book, a conversation between Confucius and his disciple [[Zeng Shen]], is about how to set up a good society using the principle of ''xiao''.<ref name="Chang">{{Cite book |last1=Wonsuk Chang |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_UC1mvUKaU8C&pg=PA68 |title=Confucianism in Context: Classic Philosophy and Contemporary Issues, East Asia and Beyond |last2=Leah Kalmanson |publisher=SUNY Press |year=2010 |isbn=978-1-4384-3191-8 |page=68}}</ref>

In more general terms, filial piety means to be good to one's parents; to take care of one's parents; to engage in good conduct not just towards parents but also outside the home so as to bring a good name to one's parents and ancestors; to perform the duties of one's job well so as to obtain the material means to support parents as well as carry out sacrifices to the ancestors; not be rebellious; show love, respect and support; the wife in filial piety must obey her husband absolutely and take care of the whole family wholeheartedly. display courtesy; ensure male heirs, uphold fraternity among brothers; wisely advise one's parents, including dissuading them from moral unrighteousness, for blindly following the parents' wishes is not considered to be ''xiao''; display sorrow for their sickness and death; and carry out [[sacrifice]]s after their death.

Filial piety is considered a key virtue in Chinese culture, and it is the main concern of a large number of stories. One of the most famous collections of such stories is "[[The Twenty-four Filial Exemplars]]". These stories depict how children exercised their filial piety in the past. While China has always had a diversity of religious beliefs, filial piety has been common to almost all of them; historian Hugh D.R. Baker calls respect for the family the only element common to almost all Chinese believers.<ref>Baker, Hugh D.R. ''Chinese Family and Kinship''. New York: Columbia University Press, 1979. p. 98</ref>

===Relationships===
Social harmony results in part from every individual knowing his or her place in the natural order, and playing his or her part well. Reciprocity or responsibility (''renqing'') extends beyond filial piety and involves the entire network of social relations, even the respect for rulers.{{sfnb|Feuchtwang|2016|p=146}} This is shown in the story where [[Duke Jing of Qi]] asks Confucius about government, by which he meant proper administration so as to bring social harmony:

{{Poem quote
|text={{lang|zh-hant|齊景公問政於孔子。孔子對曰：君君，臣臣，父父，子子。| size=115% }}
The [[Duke Jing of Qi|duke Jing, of Qi]], asked Confucius about government. Confucius replied, "There is government, when the prince is prince, and the minister is minister; when the father is father, and the son is son."
|source=''Analects'' 12.11 (Legge translation).
}}

Particular duties arise from one's particular situation in relation to others. The individual stands simultaneously in several different relationships with different people: as a junior in relation to parents and elders, and as a senior in relation to younger siblings, students, and others. While juniors are considered in Confucianism to owe their seniors reverence, seniors also have duties of benevolence and concern toward juniors. The same is true with the husband and wife relationship where the husband needs to show benevolence towards his wife and the wife needs to respect the husband in return. This theme of mutuality still exists in East Asian cultures even to this day.

The Five Bonds are: ruler to ruled, father to son, husband to wife, elder brother to younger brother, friend to friend. Specific duties were prescribed to each of the participants in these sets of relationships. Such duties are also extended to the dead, where the living stand as sons to their deceased family. The only relationship where respect for elders is not stressed was the friend to friend relationship, where mutual equal respect is emphasised instead. All these duties take the practical form of prescribed rituals, for instance wedding and death rituals.{{sfnb|Feuchtwang|2016|p=146}}

===''Junzi''===
{{Main|Junzi}}
The ''junzi'' is a [[Chinese philosophy|Chinese philosophical]] term often translated as "[[gentleman]]" or "superior person."<ref>Sometimes "exemplary person." Roger T. Ames and Henry Rosemont, Jr., ''The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation''. Paul Goldin translates it "noble man" in an attempt to capture both its early political and later moral meaning. Cf. "[http://faculty.plattsburgh.edu/kurtis.hagen/keyterms_junzi.html Confucian Key Terms: Junzi] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140520073016/http://faculty.plattsburgh.edu/kurtis.hagen/keyterms_junzi.html |date=20 May 2014 }}."</ref> ''Junzi'', which literally means "son of a lord", was redefined by Confucius in the ''Analects'' to describe a person of noble character and ethical virtue.{{sfn|Woo|2019|p=291}}

In Confucianism, the sage or wise is the ideal personality; however, it is very hard to become one of them. Confucius created the model of ''junzi'', which may be achieved by any individual through the discipline of one's minds and actions.{{sfn|Woo|2019|p=295}} Song dynasty Confucian philosopher [[Zhu Xi]] defined ''junzi'' as second only to the sage. There are many characteristics of the ''junzi'': he may live in poverty, he does more and speaks less, he is loyal, obedient and knowledgeable. The ''junzi'' disciplines himself. ''Ren'' is fundamental to become a ''junzi''.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Yang Tianshi (杨天石) |date=2005 |title=君子 – 儒学的理想人格 |url=http://jds.cass.cn/Item/1390.aspx |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150418015158/http://jds.cass.cn/Item/1390.aspx |archive-date=18 April 2015 |language=zh}}</ref>

As the potential leader of a nation, a son of the ruler is raised to have a superior ethical and moral position while gaining inner peace through his virtue. The ''junzi'' enforces his rule over his subjects by acting virtuously himself. It is thought that his pure virtue would lead others to follow his example. The ultimate goal is that the government behaves much like a family, the ''junzi'' being a beacon of filial piety. To Confucius, the ''junzi'' sustained the functions of government and social stratification through his ethical values. Despite its literal meaning, any righteous man willing to improve himself may become a ''junzi''.

In contrast to the ''junzi'', the ''xiaoren'' ({{lang-zh|labels=no|c=小人|p=xiăorén}} ), small-minded or morally inferior people,{{sfn|Woo|2019|p=295}} do not grasp the value of virtues and seeks only immediate gains. The petty person is [[egotistic]] and does not consider the consequences of his action in the overall scheme of things. Should the ruler be surrounded by ''xiaoren'' as opposed to ''junzi'', his governance and his people will suffer due to their small-mindness. Examples of such ''xiaoren'' individuals may range from those who continually indulge in sensual and emotional pleasures all day to the politician who is interested merely in power and fame; neither sincerely aims for the long-term benefit of others.

===Rectification of names===
[[File:Tablet of Confucius.jpg|thumb|Priest paying homage to Confucius's tablet, {{circa|1900}}]]
{{Main|Rectification of names}}
Confucius believed that social disorder often stemmed from failure to perceive, understand, and deal with reality. Fundamentally, then, social disorder may stem from the failure to call things by their proper names, and his solution to this was the {{zht|c=正名|p=zhèngmíng|tr=rectification of names}}. He gave an explanation of this concept to one of his disciples:

{{blockquote|
Zi-lu said, "The vassal of Wei has been waiting for you, in order with you to administer the government. What will you consider the first thing to be done?"<br />
The Master replied, "What is necessary to rectify names."<br />
"So! indeed!" said Zi-lu. "You are wide off the mark! Why must there be such rectification?"<br />
The Master said, "How uncultivated you are, Yu! The superior man {{bracket|Junzi}} cannot care about the everything, just as he cannot go to check all himself!<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;If names be not correct, language is not in accordance with the truth of things.<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;If language be not in accordance with the truth of things, affairs cannot be carried on to success.<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;When affairs cannot be carried on to success, proprieties and music do not flourish.<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;When proprieties and music do not flourish, punishments will not be properly awarded.<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;When punishments are not properly awarded, the people do not know how to move hand or foot.<br />
Therefore a superior man considers it necessary that the names he uses may be spoken appropriately, and also that what he speaks may be carried out appropriately. What the superior man requires is just that in his words there may be nothing incorrect."<br />
(''Analects'' XIII, 3, tr. Legge)
}}

''[[Xunzi (book)|Xunzi]]'' chapter (22) "On the Rectification of Names" claims the ancient sage-kings chose names ({{zhi|c=名|p=míng}}) that directly corresponded with actualities ({{zhi|c=實|p=shí}}), but later generations confused terminology, coined new nomenclature, and thus could no longer distinguish right from wrong. Since [[harmonious society|social harmony]] is of utmost importance, without the proper rectification of names, society would essentially crumble and "undertakings {{bracket|would}} not {{bracket|be}} completed."<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Taylor |first1=Rodney L. |title=The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Confucianism |last2=Choy |first2=Howard Y.F. |publisher=Rosen Publishing Group |year=2004 |isbn=978-0-8239-4079-0 |location=New York |pages=48–50}}.</ref>

==History==
===Metaphysical antecedents===
[[File:Temple rooftop dragon in Taiwan (1).jpg|thumb|The [[Chinese dragon|dragon]] is one of the oldest symbols of Chinese religious culture. It symbolises the supreme godhead, ''Di'' or ''Tian'', at the north [[orbital pole|ecliptic pole]], around which it coils itself as the [[Draco (constellation)|homonymous constellation]]. It is a symbol of the "protean" supreme power which has in itself both [[yin and yang]].{{sfnb|Pankenier|2013|p=55}}]]
[[File:Birth Places of Chinese Philosophers.png|thumb|Birthplaces of notable Chinese philosophers of the Hundred Schools of Thought in Zhou dynasty. Confucians are marked by triangles in dark red.]]
{{See also|History of religion in China}}
{{Chinese folk religion}}
According to [[He Guanghu]], Confucianism may be identified as a continuation of the [[Shang dynasty|Shang]]-[[Zhou dynasty|Zhou]] ({{circa|1600}}–256 BC) official religion, or the Chinese aboriginal religion which has lasted uninterrupted for three thousand years.{{sfnb|Chen|2012|p=105, note 45}} Both the dynasties worshipped a supreme "godhead", called ''[[Shangdi]]'' ('Highest Deity') or ''Di'' by the Shang and ''[[Tian]]'' ('Heaven') by the Zhou. ''Shangdi'' was conceived as the first ancestor of the Shang royal house,{{sfnb|Libbrecht|2007|p=43}} an alternate name for him being the "Supreme Progenitor" ({{zhi|c=上甲|p=Shàngjiǎ}}).{{sfnb|Didier|2009|pp=227–228, Vol. II}} Shang theology viewed the multiplicity of gods of nature and ancestors as parts of ''Di''. ''Di'' manifests as the ''[[Wufang Shangdi]]'' with the winds ({{zhi|c=風|p=fēng}}) as its cosmic will.{{sfnb|Didier|2009|pp=143–144, Vol. II}} With the Zhou dynasty, which overthrew the Shang, the name for the supreme godhead became ''tian''.{{sfnb|Libbrecht|2007|p=43}} While the Shang identified ''Shangdi'' as their ancestor-god to assert their claim to power by divine right, the Zhou transformed this claim into a legitimacy based on moral power, the [[Mandate of Heaven]]. In Zhou theology, ''Tian'' had no singular earthly progeny, but bestowed divine favour on virtuous rulers. Zhou kings declared that their victory over the Shang was because they were virtuous and loved their people, while the Shang were tyrants and thus were deprived of power by ''Tian''.{{sfnb|Fung|2008|p=163}}

John C. Didier and David Pankenier relate the shapes of both the ancient [[Chinese characters]] for ''Di'' and ''Tian'' to the patterns of stars in the northern skies, either drawn, in Didier's theory by connecting the constellations bracketing the north celestial pole as a square,{{sfnb|Didier|2009|p=103, Vol. II}} or in Pankenier's theory by connecting some of the stars which form the constellations of the Big Dipper and broader [[Ursa Major]], and [[Ursa Minor]] (Little Dipper).{{sfnb|Pankenier|2013|pp=138–148, "Chapter 4: Bringing Heaven Down to Earth"}} Cultures in other parts of the world have also conceived these stars or constellations as symbols of the origin of things, the supreme godhead, divinity and royal power.{{sfnb|Didier|2009|loc=''passim'' Vol. I}} The supreme godhead was also identified with the [[Chinese dragon|dragon]], symbol of unlimited power (''[[qi]]''),{{sfnb|Libbrecht|2007|p=43}} of the protean primordial power which embodies both [[yin and yang]] in unity, associated to the constellation [[Draco (constellation)|Draco]] which winds around the north [[orbital pole|ecliptic pole]],{{sfnb|Pankenier|2013|p=55}} and slithers between the Little and Big Dipper.

===Zhou traditions wane===
By the 6th century BC, the power of ''Tian'' and the symbols that represented it on earth (architecture of cities, temples, altars and [[Chinese ritual bronzes|ritual vessels]], and the Zhou system of rites) became "diffuse" and claimed by different potentates in the [[Ancient Chinese states|Zhou states]] to legitimise economic, political, and military ambitions. Communication with the divine no longer was an exclusive privilege of the Zhou royal house, but might be bought by anyone able to afford the elaborate ceremonies and the old and new rites required to access the authority of ''Tian''.{{sfnb|Didier|2009|pp=xxxvi–xxxvii, Vol. I}}

Besides the waning Zhou ritual system, what may be defined as {{zhl|l=wild|c=野|p=yě}} traditions, or traditions outside of the official system, developed as attempts to access the will of ''Tian''. As central political authority crumbled in the wake of the collapse of the [[Western Zhou]], the population lost faith in the official tradition, which was no longer perceived as an effective way to communicate with Heaven. The traditions of the {{zhl|l=Nine Fields|c=九野}} and of the ''[[Yijing]]'' flourished.{{sfnb|Didier|2009|pp=xxxvii–xxxviii, Vol. I}} Chinese thinkers, faced with this challenge to legitimacy, diverged in a "[[Hundred Schools of Thought]]", each positing its own philosophical lens for understanding the processes of the world.

[[Confucius]] (551–479 BC) appeared in this period of political reconfiguration and spiritual questioning. He was educated in Shang–Zhou traditions, which he contributed to transmit and reformulate giving centrality to [[self-cultivation]] and agency of humans,{{sfnb|Fung|2008|p=163}} and the educational power of the self-established individual in assisting others to establish themselves (the  {{zhi|c=愛人|p=àirén|l=principle of loving others}}).{{sfnb|Zhou|2012|p=2}} As the Zhou reign collapsed, traditional values were abandoned resulting in a period of perceived moral decline. Confucius saw an opportunity to reinforce values of compassion and tradition into society, with the intended goal of reconstructing what he believed to be a lost perfect moral order of high antiquity. Disillusioned with the culture, opposing scholars, and religious authorities of the time, he began to advance an ethical interpretation of traditional Zhou religion.<ref name=":1">{{Cite book |last1=Ivanhoe |first1=Philip J. |title=Readings in Classical Chinese Philosophy |last2=Van Norden |first2=Bryan W. |publisher=[[Hackett Publishing Company]] |year=2005 |isbn=0-87220-781-1 |edition=2nd |location=Indianapolis |page=2 |oclc=60826646 |author-link=Philip J. Ivanhoe |author-link2=Bryan W. Van Norden}}</ref> In his view, the power of ''Tian'' is pervasive, and responds positively to the sincere heart driven by humaneness and rightness, decency and altruism. Confucius conceived these qualities as the foundation needed to restore socio-political harmony. Like many contemporaries, Confucius saw ritual practices as efficacious ways to access ''Tian'', but he thought that the crucial knot was the reverent inner state that participants enter prior to engaging in the ritual acts.{{sfnb|Didier|2009|loc=Vol. III, pp. 96–99}} Confucius is said to have amended and recodified the [[Chinese classics|classical books]] inherited from the Xia-Shang-Zhou dynasties, and to have composed the ''[[Spring and Autumn Annals]]''.{{sfnb|Zhou|2012|p=1}}

===Confucianism rises===
Philosophers in the [[Warring States period]], both focused on state-endorsed ritual and non-aligned to state ritual built upon Confucius's legacy, compiled in the ''[[Analects]]'', and formulated the classical metaphysics that became the lash of Confucianism. In accordance with Confucius, they identified mental tranquility as the state of ''Tian'', or {{zhl|l=the One|c=一|p=Yī}}, which in each individual is the Heaven-bestowed divine power to rule one's own life and the world. They also extended the theory, proposing the oneness of production and reabsorption into the cosmic source, and the possibility to understand and therefore reattain it through correct state of mind. This line of thought would have influenced all Chinese individual and collective-political mystical theories and practices thereafter.{{sfnb|Didier|2009|pp=xxxviii–xxxix, Vol. I}}

In the Han dynasty, Confucians beginning with [[Dong Zhongshu]] synthesised Warring States Confucianism with ideas of [[yin and yang]], and ''[[Wuxing (Chinese philosophy)|wuxing]]'', as well as folk superstition and the prior schools that led up to the [[School of Naturalists]].<ref name=":10027">{{Cite book |title=World Religions: Eastern Traditions |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |year=2002 |isbn=0-19-541521-3 |editor-last=Willard Gurdon Oxtoby |edition=2nd |location=Don Mills, Ontario |pages=169–170 |oclc=46661540}}</ref>

In the [[460s]], Confucianism competed with [[Chinese Buddhism]] and "traditional Confucianism" was "a broad cosmology that was as much about personal ethics as about spiritual beliefs" and had roots that went back to Confucianist [[Philosophy|philosophers]] from over a thousand years before.<ref name=":032">{{Cite book |last=Frankopan |first=Peter |title=The Silk Roads: A New History of the World |date=March 2017 |publisher=[[Vintage Books]] |isbn=978-1-101-94633-6 |edition=First Vintage Books |location=New York |pages=32 |author-link=Peter Frankopan}}</ref>

===Decline===

The Confucian examination system was abolished in [[Gwageo|Korea]] in 1894, in [[imperial examination|China]] in 1905, and in [[Confucian court examination system in Vietnam|Vietnam]] in 1919. This meant that [[conformity]] to Confucian ideology was no longer a prerequisite for a career in the civil service or politics, allowing persons of other ideologies (notably Nationalism and Socialism) to attain leading positions in society.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Liu|first= Haifeng |date=October 2007|title= Influence of China's imperial examinations on Japan, Korea and Vietnam|journal =Frontiers of History in China|volume =2|issue=4| pages=493–512 | doi= 10.1007/s11462-007-0025-5|translator=Yang Chunyan| orig-date =2006}} Originally published in ''Xueshu Yuekan'' 学术月刊 [{{em|Academic Monthly}}] {{strong|2006}} (12): 136–142.</ref>

==Organisation and liturgy==
{{Main|Religious Confucianism}}
{{Further|Confucian church{{!}}Confucian churches|Chinese lineage associations{{!}}Lineage churches|Temple of Confucius}}
{{See also|Confucian ritual religion|Kongshenghui}}
[[File:柳州市孔庙 Liuzhou Confucius Temple.jpg|thumb|A Temple of the God of Culture ({{zhi|c=文庙|p=wénmiào}}) in [[Liuzhou]], Guangxi, where [[Confucius]] is worshiped as {{zhl|p=wéndì|c=文帝|l=God of Culture}}]]
[[File:Temple of the Filial Blessing in Ouhai, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China (1).jpg|thumb|Temple of the Filial Blessing ({{zhi|c=孝佑宫|p=Xiàoyòugōng}}), an [[ancestral temple]] of a [[lineage church]], in [[Wenzhou]], [[Zhejiang]]]]
Since the 2000s, there has been a growing identification of the Chinese intellectual class with Confucianism.<ref name="Yang2010">{{Cite journal |last=Yang |first=Fenggang |date=July 2007 |title=Cultural Dynamics in China: Today and in 2020 |url=https://www.purdue.edu/crcs/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/YangChina2020s.pdf |url-status=live |journal=Asia Policy |page=48 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140913015651/https://www.purdue.edu/crcs/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/YangChina2020s.pdf |archive-date=2014-09-13 |number=4}}</ref> In 2003, the Confucian intellectual Kang Xiaoguang published a manifesto in which he made four suggestions: Confucian education should enter official education at any level, from elementary to high school; the state should establish Confucianism as the state religion by law; Confucian religion should enter the daily life of ordinary people through standardisation and development of doctrines, rituals, organisations, churches and activity sites; the Confucian religion should be spread through non-governmental organisations.<ref name="Yang2010" /> Another modern proponent of the institutionalisation of Confucianism in a [[state church]] is [[Jiang Qing (Confucian)|Jiang Qing]].{{sfnb|Chen|2012|p=175}}

In 2005, the Center for the Study of Confucian Religion was established,<ref name="Yang2010" /> and ''[[guoxue]]'' started to be implemented in public schools on all levels. Being well received by the population, even Confucian preachers have appeared on television since 2006.<ref name="Yang2010" /> The most enthusiastic New Confucians proclaim the uniqueness and superiority of Confucian Chinese culture, and have generated some popular sentiment against Western cultural influences in China.<ref name="Yang2010" />

The idea of a "[[Confucian church]]" as the [[state religion]] of China has roots in the thought of [[Kang Youwei]], an exponent of the early New Confucian search for a regeneration of the social relevance of Confucianism, at a time when it was de-institutionalised with the collapse of the [[Qing dynasty]] and the Chinese empire.{{sfnb|Chen|2012|p=174}} Kang modeled his ideal "Confucian Church" after European national Christian churches, as a hierarchic and centralised institution, closely bound to the state, with local church branches, devoted to the worship and the spread of the teachings of Confucius.{{sfnb|Chen|2012|p=174}}

In contemporary China, the Confucian revival has developed into various interwoven directions: the proliferation of [[Academies of Classical Learning|Confucian schools or academies]],{{sfnb|Chen|2012|p=175}} the resurgence of [[Confucian rites]],{{sfnb|Chen|2012|p=175}} and the birth of new forms of Confucian activity on the popular level, such as the Confucian communities ({{zhi|t=社區儒學|p=shèqū rúxué}}). Some scholars also consider the reconstruction of [[lineage churches]] and their [[ancestral temples]], as well as cults and temples of natural and national gods within broader Chinese traditional religion, as part of the renewal of Confucianism.{{sfnb|Fan|Chen|2015a|p=7}}

Other forms of revival are [[Chinese salvationist religion|salvationist folk religious movements]]{{sfnb|Billioud|2010|pp=203–214}} groups with a specifically Confucian focus, or [[Confucian churches]], for example the {{zhp|p=Yīdān xuétáng|c=一耽學堂}} of [[Beijing]],{{sfnb|Billioud|2010|p=219}} the {{zhp|p=Mèngmǔtáng|c=孟母堂}} of [[Shanghai]],{{sfnb|Fan|Chen|2015|p=29}} [[Confucian Shenism]] (also known as the "phoenix churches"),{{sfnb|Fan|Chen|2015|p=34}} the Confucian Fellowship ({{zhi|c=儒教道壇|p=Rújiào Dàotán}}) in northern [[Fujian]] which has spread rapidly over the years after its foundation,{{sfnb|Fan|Chen|2015|p=34}} and [[ancestral temples]] of the Kong kin (the lineage of the descendants of Confucius himself) operating as Confucian-teaching churches.{{sfnb|Fan|Chen|2015|p=29}}

Also, the Hong Kong Confucian Academy, one of the direct heirs of Kang Youwei's Confucian Church, has expanded its activities to the mainland, with the construction of statues of Confucius, Confucian hospitals, restoration of temples and other activities.{{sfnb|Billioud|Thoraval|2015|p=148}} In 2009, Zhou Beichen founded another institution which inherits the idea of Kang Youwei's Confucian Church, the Holy Hall of Confucius ({{zhi|c=孔聖堂|p=Kǒngshèngtáng}}) in [[Shenzhen]], affiliated with the Federation of Confucian Culture of [[Qufu]] City.{{sfnb|Payette|2014}}{{sfnb|Billioud|Thoraval|2015|pp=152–156}} It was the first of a nationwide movement of congregations and civil organisations that was unified in 2015 in the [[Holy Confucian Church]]. The first spiritual leader of the church is the scholar [[Jiang Qing (Confucian)|Jiang Qing]], the founder and manager of the Yangming Confucian Abode ({{zhi|c=陽明精舍|p=Yángmíng jīngshě}}), a Confucian academy in [[Guiyang]], [[Guizhou]].

Chinese folk religious temples and kinship ancestral shrines may, on peculiar occasions, choose Confucian liturgy (called {{zhi|c=儒|p=rú}} or {{zhi|c=正統|p=zhèngtǒng|l=[[orthopraxy]]|out=c}} led by Confucian ritual masters ({{zhi|c=禮生|p=lǐshēng}}) to worship the gods, instead of Taoist or popular ritual.{{sfnb|Clart|2003|pp=3–5}} "Confucian businessmen" ({{zhi|c=儒商人|p=rúshāngrén}}, also "refined businessman") is a recently "rediscovered" concept defining people of the economic-entrepreneurial elite who recognise their social responsibility and therefore apply Confucian culture to their business.{{sfnb|Billioud|2010|p=204}}

Confucianists historically tried to [[Proselytism|proselytize]] to others,<ref name=":022">{{Cite book |last1=Bohan |first1=Elise  |title=Big History |last2=Dinwiddie |first2=Robert |last3=Challoner |first3=Jack |last4=Stuart |first4=Colin |last5=Harvey |first5=Derek |last6=Wragg-Sykes |first6=Rebecca |last7=Chrisp |first7=Peter |last8=Hubbard |first8=Ben |last9=Parker |first9=Phillip |date=February 2016 |publisher=[[DK (publisher)|DK]] |others=Foreword by [[David Christian (historian)|David Christian]] |isbn=978-1-4654-5443-0 |edition=1st American |location=[[New York City|New York]] |page=275 |oclc=940282526 |author-link6=Rebecca Wragg Sykes |author-link7=Peter Chrisp}}</ref> although this is rarely done in modern times. Given Confucianism's place of importance in historical Chinese governments, the argument has been made that Imperial China's wars were Confucianism's wars, but the connection between Confucianism and war is not so direct or simple.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Yao |first=Fuchuan | author-mask= Yao Fuchun |date=2011-05-01 |title=War and Confucianism  |journal=Asian Philosophy |volume=21 |issue=2 |pages=213–226 |doi=10.1080/09552367.2011.563996 |issn=0955-2367 |s2cid=145534064 |publisher=[[Taylor & Francis]]}}</ref> Modern Confucianism is the descendant of movements that greatly changed how they practiced the teachings of Confucius and his disciples from previous orthodox teachings.<ref name=":02">{{Cite book |last=Harari |first=Yuval Noah |author-link=Yuval Noah Harari |title=Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind |publisher=Penguin Random House UK |year=2015 |isbn=978-0-09-959008-8 |location=London |pages=391 |translator-last=Harari |translator-first=Yuval Noah |oclc=910498369 |translator-last2=Purcell |translator-first2=John |translator-last3=Watzman |translator-first3=Haim |translator-link=Yuval Noah Harari |translator-link3=Haim Watzman}}</ref>

==Governance==
[[File:君臣魚水 - 劉備與諸葛亮.jpg|thumb|Statue of [[Liu Bei]] and [[Zhuge Liang]], considered the ideal example of the loyalty, integrity and shared governance between a lord and [[Grand chancellor (China)|minister]] in Chinese history<ref group="note">The phrase "{{lang|zh-hant|魚水君臣}}" ("Fish (and) water lord (and) subject") refers to the term "{{lang|zh-hant|君臣魚水}}" from [[Records of the Three Kingdoms]], where Liu Bei refers to gaining Zhuge Liang's service as if "a fish gaining water".</ref>]]
[[File:Yushima Seido 002.jpg|thumb|[[Yushima Seidō]] in [[Bunkyō]], [[Tokyo]], Japan]]
{{Poem quote
|text={{lang|zh-hant|子曰：為政以德，譬如北辰，居其所而眾星共之。|size=115%}}
The Master said, "He who exercises government by means of his virtue may be compared to the north polar star, which keeps its place and all the stars turn towards it."
|source=''Analects'' 2.1 (Legge translation).
}}

A key Confucian concept is that in order to govern others one must first cultivate inner virtue to be a moral elite. When actual, the king's personal virtue (''[[De (Chinese)|de]]'') spreads beneficent influence throughout the kingdom. The authority of the ruler and the submission of its people are grounded on a spiritual-ethical foundation, rather than on coercive power.{{sfn|Gardner|2014|pp=33-34}} Confucius' ideal of good government, is one led by a superior man (''[[junzi]]''),  takes effective use of "culture and tradition", and relies less on law and punishment.{{sfn|Gardner|2014|pp=37-38}}

When Confucius praised the sage-king [[Emperor Shun|Shun]] for his "non-action", the undertone is different from the Taoist ''[[wu wei]]'' that emphasizes a spontaneous reaction to allow the natural course of things. The Confucian non-action is conditioned by a solid moral base and compassion for the welfare of the people. The virtuous ruler's non-action is further supported by the officials he appoints—individuals of upright character and benevolence toward the common people.{{sfn|Gardner|2014|pp=39-40}}

[[Mencius]] provided more concrete and specific measures in the making of a "good ruler". He advised that a good ruler must prioritize the people's welfare by ensuring adequate food and shelter, implementing light taxation, and avoiding unnecessary warfare, as moral instructions can only follow after people's basic needs are satisfied.{{sfn|Gardner|2014|pp=54-55}} He argued that rulers should govern by moral example—exhibiting sincerity, benevolence, and righteousness—so that subjects emulate virtuous conduct. {{sfn|Gardner|2014|p=56}}

The [[emperors of China]] were considered agents of Heaven, endowed with the [[Mandate of Heaven]],<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia |title=Tianming |encyclopedia=[[Encyclopedia Britannica]] |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/tianming |access-date=2023-04-28 |date=2008}}</ref> one of the most vital concepts in imperial-era political theory. According to the Confucian classics, the Mandate is not fated or absolute, it reacts to the wishes and interests of the people. While virtuous rulers keep the Mandate, wicked ruler would be abandoned by the Mandate.{{sfn|Gardner|2014|pp=44-46}}

Confucianism, despite supporting the importance of obeying national authority, places this obedience under absolute moral principles that curbed the willful exercise of power, rather than being unconditional. Submission to authority was only taken within the context of the moral obligations that rulers had toward their subjects, in particular ''[[ren (Confucianism)|ren]]''. Confucians—including the most pro-authoritarian scholars such as [[Xunzi (philosopher)|Xunzi]]—have always recognised the [[right of revolution]] against tyranny.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Wood |first=Alan Thomas |url=https://archive.org/details/limitstoautocrac00wood/page/149 |title=Limits to Autocracy: From Sung Neo-Confucianism to a Doctrine of Political Rights |date=1995 |publisher=University of Hawaii Press |isbn=0-8248-1703-6 |pages=[https://archive.org/details/limitstoautocrac00wood/page/149 149–154]}}</ref>

==Meritocracy==
{{Poem quote
|text={{lang|zh-hant|子曰：有教無類。|size=115%}}
The Master said: "In teaching, there should be no distinction of classes."
|source=''Analects'' 15.39 (Legge translation).
}}

Although Confucius claimed that he never invented anything but was only transmitting ancient knowledge ([[:zh:s:論語/述而第七#七之一|''Analects'' 7.1]]), he did produce a number of new ideas. Many European and American admirers such as [[Voltaire]] and [[Herrlee G. Creel]] point to the revolutionary idea of replacing nobility of blood with nobility of virtue.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Creel |first=Herlee G. |title=Confucius and the Chinese Way |publisher=Harper & Brothers |year=1960 |isbn=0-06-130063-2 |location=New York |author-link=Herlee G. Creel}}</ref> ''[[Junzi]]'' ('lord's son'), which originally signified the younger, non-inheriting, offspring of a noble, became, in Confucius's work, an epithet having much the same meaning and evolution as the English "gentleman".

A virtuous commoner who cultivates his qualities may be a "gentleman", while a shameless son of the king is only a "petty person". That Confucius admitted students of different classes as disciples is a clear demonstration that he fought against the feudal structures that defined pre-imperial Chinese society.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Chin |first=Annping |title=Confucius: a Life of Thought and Politics |date=2008 |publisher=Yale University Press |isbn=978-0-300-15118-3 |author-link=Annping Chin}}</ref>{{page needed|date=August 2023}}

Another new idea, that of [[meritocracy]], led to the introduction of the [[imperial examination]] system in China. This system allowed anyone who passed an examination to become a government officer, a position which would bring wealth and honour to the whole family. The Chinese imperial examination system started in the [[Sui dynasty]]. Over the following centuries the system grew until finally almost anyone who wished to become an official had to prove his worth by passing a set of written government examinations.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Bai |first=Tongdong |title=China: The Political Philosophy of the Middle Kingdom |publisher=Zed Books |year=2012 |isbn=978-1-78032-075-5 |pages=60–82}}</ref>

Confucian political meritocracy is not merely a historical phenomenon. The practice of meritocracy still exists across China and East Asia today, and a wide range of contemporary intellectuals—from [[Daniel A. Bell|Daniel Bell]] to Tongdong Bai, Joseph Chan, and [[Jiang Qing (Confucian)|Jiang Qing]]—defend political meritocracy as a viable alternative to liberal democracy.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Kim |first=Sungmoon |date=2020 |title=The challenge of Confucian political meritocracy: A critical introduction |journal=Philosophy & Social Criticism |volume=46 |issue=9 |pages=1005–1016 |doi=10.1177/0191453720948380 |s2cid=225056920}}</ref>

In ''Just Hierarchy'', Daniel Bell and Wang Pei argue that hierarchies are inevitable.<ref name="Daniel A 2020">{{Cite book |last1=Daniel A. Bell |title=Just Hierarchy |last2=Wang Pei |date=2020 |publisher=Princeton University Press |location=Princeton}}</ref> Faced with ever-increasing complexity at scale, modern societies must build hierarchies to coordinate collective action and tackle long-term problems such as climate change. In this context, people need not—and should not—want to flatten hierarchies as much as possible. They ought to ask what makes political hierarchies just and use these criteria to decide the institutions that deserve preservation, those that require reform, and those that need radical transformation. They call this approach "progressive conservatism", a term that reflects the ambiguous place of the Confucian tradition within the Left-Right dichotomy.<ref name="Daniel A 2020" />{{rp|8–21}}

Bell and Wang propose two justifications for political hierarchies that do not depend on a "one person, one vote" system. First is raw efficiency, which may require centralized rule in the hands of the competent few. Second, and most important, is serving the interests of the people (and the common good more broadly).<ref name="Daniel A 2020" />{{rp|66–93}} In ''[[Against Political Equality]]'', Tongdong Bai complements this account by using a proto-Rawlsian "political difference principle". Just as Rawls claims that [[economic inequality]] is justified so long as it benefits those at the bottom of the socioeconomic ladder, so Bai argues that political inequality is justified so long as it benefits those materially worse off.<ref name="Bai">{{Cite book |last=Bai |first=Tongdong |title=Against Political Equality: The Confucian Case |date=2019 |publisher=Princeton University Press |location=Princeton}}</ref>{{rp|102–106}}

Bell, Wang, and Bai all criticize liberal democracy to argue that government {{em|by}} the people may not be government {{em|for}} the people in any meaningful sense of the term. They argue that voters tend to act in irrational, tribal, short-termist ways; they are vulnerable to populism and struggle to account for the interests of future generations. In other words, at a minimum, democracy needs Confucian meritocratic checks.<ref name="Bai" />{{rp|32–47}}

In ''The China Model'', Bell argues that Confucian political meritocracy provides—and has provided—a blueprint for China's development.<ref name="Daniel A. Bell 2016" /> For Bell, the ideal according to which China should reform itself (and has reformed itself) follows a simple structure: Aspiring rulers first pass hyper-selective examinations, then have to rule well at the local level to be promoted to positions as the provincial level, then have to excel at the provincial level to access positions at the national level, and so on.<ref name="Daniel A. Bell 2016">{{Cite book |last=Daniel A. Bell |title=The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy |date=2016 |publisher=Princeton University Press |location=Princeton |pages=63–110, 151–179}}</ref>{{rp|151–179}} This system aligns with what Harvard historian James Hankins calls "virtue politics", or the idea that institutions should be built to select the most competent and virtuous rulers—as opposed to institutions concerned first and foremost with limiting the power of rulers.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Hankins |first=James |title=Virtue Politics: Soulcraft and Statecraft in Renaissance Italy |publisher=Belknap Press |year=2019 |isbn=978-0-674-23755-1 |location=Cambridge, MA}}</ref>

While contemporary defenders of Confucian political meritocracy all accept this broad frame, they disagree with each other on three main questions: institutional design, the means by which meritocrats are promoted, and the compatibility of Confucian political meritocracy with liberalism.

===Institutional design===
Bell and Wang favour a system in which officials at the local level are democratically elected and higher-level officials are promoted by peers.<ref name="Daniel A 2020" />{{rp|66–93}} As Bell puts it, he defends "democracy at the bottom, experimentation in the middle, and meritocracy at the top."<ref name="Daniel A. Bell 2016" />{{rp|151–179}} Bell and Wang argue that this combination conserves the main advantages of democracy—involving the people in public affairs at the local level, strengthening the legitimacy of the system, forcing some degree of direct accountability, etc.—while preserving the broader meritocratic character of the regime.

Jiang Qing, by contrast, imagines a tricameral government with one chamber selected by the people (the {{zhi|t=庶民院|l=House of the Commoners}}), one chamber composed of Confucian meritocrats selected via examination and gradual promotion (the {{zhi|c=通儒院|l=House of Confucian Tradition}}), and one body made up of descendants of Confucius himself (the {{zhi|t=國體院|l=House of National Essence}}).<ref name="Jiang">{{Cite book |last=Jiang Qing |title=A Confucian Constitutional Order: How China's Ancient Past Can Shape Its Political Future |date=2013 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=9780691154602 |location=Princeton}}</ref> Jiang's aim is to construct a legitimacy that will go beyond what he sees as the atomistic, individualist, and utilitarian ethos of modern democracies and ground authority in something sacred and traditional. While Jiang's model is closer to an ideal theory than Bell's proposals, it represents a more traditionalist alternative.

Tongdong Bai presents an in-between solution by proposing a two-tiered bicameral system.<ref name="Bai" />{{rp|52–110}} At the local level, as with Bell, Bai advocates Deweyan participatory democracy. At the national level, Bai proposes two chambers: one of meritocrats (selected by examination, by examination and promotion, from leaders in certain professional fields, etc.), and one of representatives elected by the people. While the lower house does not have any legislative power per se, it acts as a popular accountability mechanism by championing the people and putting pressure on the upper house. More generally, Bai argues that his model marries the best of meritocracy and democracy. Following Dewey's account of democracy as a way of life, he points to the participatory features of his local model: citizens still get to have a democratic lifestyle, participate in political affairs, and be educated as "democratic men". Similarly, the lower house allows citizens to be represented, have a voice in public affairs (albeit a weak one), and ensure accountability. Meanwhile, the meritocratic house preserves competence, statesmanship, and Confucian virtues.

===Promotion system===
Defenders of Confucian political meritocracy generally champion a system in which rulers are selected on the basis of intellect, social skills, and virtue. Bell proposes a model wherein aspiring meritocrats take hyper-selective exams and prove themselves at the local levels of government before reaching the higher levels of government, where they hold more centralized power.<ref name="Daniel A. Bell 2016" />{{rp|151–179}} In his account, the exams select for intellect and other virtues—for instance, the ability to argue three different viewpoints on a contentious issue may indicate a certain degree of openness.<ref name="Daniel A. Bell 2016" />{{rp|63–110}} Tongdong Bai's approach incorporates different ways to select members of the meritocratic house, from exams to performance in various fields—business, science, administration, and so on. In every case, Confucian meritocrats draw on China's extensive history of meritocratic administration to outline the pros and cons of competing methods of selection.<ref name="Bai" />{{rp|67–97}}

For those who, like Bell, defend a model in which performance at the local levels of government determines future promotion, an important question is how the system judges who "performs best". In other words, while examinations may ensure that early-career officials are competent and educated, how is it thereafter ensured that ''only'' those who rule well get promoted? The literature opposes those who prefer evaluation by peers to evaluation by superiors, with some thinkers including quasi-democratic selection mechanisms along the way. Bell and Wang favour a system in which officials at the local level are democratically elected and higher-level officials are promoted by peers.<ref name="Daniel A 2020" />{{rp|84–106}} Because they believe that promotion should depend upon peer evaluations only, Bell and Wang argue against transparency—i.e. the public should not know how officials are selected, since ordinary people are in no position to judge officials beyond the local level.<ref name="Daniel A 2020" />{{rp|76–78}} Others, like Jiang Qing, defend a model in which superiors decide who gets promoted; this method is in line with more traditionalist strands of Confucian political thought, which place a greater emphasis on strict hierarchies and epistemic paternalism—that is, the idea that older and more experienced people know more.<ref name="Jiang" />{{rp|27–44}}

===Compatibility with liberalism and democracy, and critique of political meritocracy===
Another key question is whether Confucian political thought is compatible with liberalism. Tongdong Bai, for instance, argues that while Confucian political thought departs from the "one person, one vote" model, it can conserve many of the essential characteristics of liberalism, such as freedom of speech and individual rights.<ref name="Bai" />{{rp|97–110}} In fact, both Daniel Bell and Tongdong Bai hold that Confucian political meritocracy can tackle challenges that liberalism wants to tackle, but cannot by itself. At the cultural level, for instance, Confucianism, its institutions, and its rituals offer bulwarks against atomization and individualism. At the political level, the non-democratic side of political meritocracy is—for Bell and Bai—more efficient at addressing long-term questions such as climate change, in part because the meritocrats do not have to worry about the whims of public opinion.<ref name="Daniel A. Bell 2016" />{{rp|14–63}}

Joseph Chan defends the compatibility of Confucianism with both liberalism and democracy. In his book ''Confucian Perfectionism'', he argues that Confucians can embrace both democracy and liberalism on instrumental grounds; that is, while liberal democracy may not be valuable for its own sake, its institutions remain valuable—particularly when combined with a broadly Confucian culture—to serve Confucian ends and inculcate Confucian virtues.<ref>Joseph Chan, ''Confucian Perfectionism: A Political Philosophy For Modern Times'' (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013).</ref>

Other Confucians have criticized Confucian meritocrats like Bell for their rejection of democracy. For them, Confucianism does not have to be premised on the assumption that meritorious, virtuous political leadership is inherently incompatible with popular sovereignty, political equality and the right to political participation.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Kim |first=Sungmoon |title=Confucian Democracy in East Asia: Theory and Practice |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2014 |isbn=978-1-107-04903-1 |location=New York}}</ref> These thinkers accuse the meritocrats of overestimating the flaws of democracy, mistaking temporary flaws for permanent and inherent features, and underestimating the challenges that the construction of a true political meritocracy poses in practice—including those faced by contemporary China and Singapore.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Tan |first=Sor-hoon |title=Confucian Democracy: A Deweyan Reconstruction |publisher=State University of New York Press |year=2003 |isbn=0-7914-5889-X |location=Albany}}</ref> Franz Mang claims that, when decoupled from democracy, meritocracy tends to deteriorate into an oppressive regime under putatively "meritorious" but actually "authoritarian" rulers; Mang accuses Bell's China model of being self-defeating, as—Mang claims—the CCP's authoritarian modes of engagement with the dissenting voices illustrate.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Mang |first=Franz |date=2020 |title=Political meritocracy and its betrayal |url=https://philpapers.org/archive/MANPMA-6.pdf |journal=Philosophy & Social Criticism |volume=46 |issue=9 |pages=1113–1126 |doi=10.1177/0191453720948386 |s2cid=225056766}}</ref> He Baogang and Mark Warren add that "meritocracy" should be understood as a concept describing a regime's character rather than its type, which is determined by distribution of political power—on their view, democratic institutions can be built which are meritocratic insofar as they favour competence.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=He Baogang |last2=Warren |first2=Mark |date=2020 |title=Can meritocracy replace democracy? A conceptual framework |journal=Philosophy & Social Criticism |volume=46 |issue=9 |pages=1093–1112 |doi=10.1177/0191453720948388 |s2cid=225056621}}</ref>

Roy Tseng, drawing on the New Confucians of the twentieth century, argues that Confucianism and liberal democracy can enter into a dialectical process, in which liberal rights and voting rights are rethought into resolutely modern, but nonetheless Confucian ways of life.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Tseng |first=Roy |date=2020 |title=Political meritocracy versus ethical democracy: The Confucian political ideal revisited |journal=Philosophy & Social Criticism |volume=46 |issue=9 |pages=1033–1052 |doi=10.1177/0191453720948398 |s2cid=224941702}}</ref> This synthesis, blending Confucians rituals and institutions with a broader liberal democratic frame, is distinct from both Western-style liberalism—which, for Tseng, suffers from excessive individualism and a lack of moral vision—and from traditional Confucianism—which, for Tseng, has historically suffered from rigid hierarchies and sclerotic elites. Against defenders of political meritocracy, Tseng claims that the fusion of Confucian and democratic institutions can conserve the best of both worlds, producing a more communal democracy which draws on a rich ethical tradition, addresses abuses of power, and combines popular accountability with a clear attention to the cultivation of virtue in elites.

==Influence==

===In 17th-century Europe===
[[File:LifeAndWorksOfConfucius1687.jpg|thumb|''Life and Works of Confucius'', by [[Prospero Intorcetta]], 1687]]

The works of Confucius were translated into European languages through the agency of [[Jesuit China missions|Jesuit missionaries stationed in China]].{{refn|group=note|The first was [[Michele Ruggieri]] who had returned from China to Italy in 1588, and carried on translating in Latin Chinese classics, while residing in Salerno.}} [[Matteo Ricci]] was among the very earliest to report on the thoughts of Confucius, and father [[Prospero Intorcetta]] wrote about the life and works of Confucius in [[Latin]] in 1687.<ref name="Windows into China">"Windows into China," John Parker, p. 25, {{ISBN|0-89073-050-4}}</ref>

Translations of Confucian texts influenced European thinkers of the period,<ref name="Mungello">{{Cite journal |last=Mungello |first=David E. |author-link=David Emil Mungello |year=1971 |title=Leibniz's Interpretation of Neo-Confucianism |journal=[[Philosophy East and West]] |publisher=[[University of Hawaii Press]] |volume=21 |issue=1 |pages=3–22 |doi=10.2307/1397760 |jstor=1397760}}</ref> particularly among the [[Deism|Deists]] and other philosophical groups of the [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]] who were interested by the integration of the system of morality of Confucius into [[Western culture|Western civilization]].<ref name="Windows into China" /><ref>[[John M. Hobson]] (2004), ''[[The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation]]'', [[Cambridge University Press]], pp. 194–195, {{ISBN|0-521-54724-5}}</ref>

Confucianism influenced the German philosopher [[Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz]], who was attracted to the philosophy because of its perceived similarity to his own. It is postulated that certain elements of Leibniz's philosophy, such as "simple substance" and "[[Pre-established harmony]]", were borrowed from his interactions with Confucianism.<ref name="Mungello" /> 
{{see also-text|''[[Monadology]]''|[[Monad (philosophy)]]}}
The French philosopher [[Voltaire]], Leibniz's intellectual rival, was also influenced by Confucius, seeing the concept of Confucian rationalism as an alternative to Christian dogma.<ref name="epc">{{Cite book |last=Feng Lan |title=Ezra Pound and Confucianism: Remaking Humanism In The Face of Modernity |publisher=[[University of Toronto Press]] |year=2005 |isbn=978-0-8020-8941-0 |page=190}}</ref> He praised Confucian ethics and politics, portraying the sociopolitical hierarchy of China as a model for Europe:<ref name="epc" />
{{blockquote|text=Confucius has no interest in falsehood; he did not pretend to be prophet; he claimed no inspiration; he taught no new religion; he used no delusions; flattered not the emperor under whom he lived{{nbsp}}...|sign=[[Voltaire]]<ref name="epc" />}}

===On Islamic thought===
From the late 17th century onwards a whole body of literature known as the [[Han Kitab]] developed amongst the [[Hui people|Hui Muslims]] of China who infused [[Islam]]ic thought with Confucianism. Especially the works of [[Liu Zhi (scholar)|Liu Zhi]] such as ''Tianfang Dianli'' ({{lang-zh|labels=no|c=天方典禮|p=Tiānfāng Diǎnlǐ}}) sought to harmonise Islam with not only Confucianism but also with [[Taoism]] and is considered to be one of the crowning achievements of the Chinese Islamic culture.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Frankel |first=James |year=2009 |title=Uncontrived Concord: The Eclectic Sources and Syncretic Theories of Liu Zhi, a Chinese Muslim Scholar |journal=Journal of Islamic Studies |volume=20 |issue=1 |pages=46–54 |doi=10.1093/jis/etn062}}</ref>

===In modern times===
Important military and political figures in modern Chinese history continued to be influenced by Confucianism, like the Muslim warlord [[Ma Fuxiang]].<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MJzB6wrz6Q4C&pg=PA251 |title=Intellectuals in the modern Islamic world: transmission, transformation, communication |publisher=Routledge |year=2006 |isbn=978-0-415-36835-3 |editor-last=Stéphane A. Dudoignon |location=London |pages=250, 375 |editor-last2=Hisao Komatsu |editor-last3=Yasushi Kosugi}}</ref> The [[New Life Movement]] in the early 20th century was also influenced by Confucianism.

Referred to variously as the Confucian hypothesis and as a debated component of the more all-encompassing Asian Development Model, there exists among political scientists and economists a theory that Confucianism plays a large latent role in the ostensibly non-Confucian cultures of modern-day East Asia, in the form of the rigorous work ethic it endowed those cultures with. These scholars have held that, if not for Confucianism's influence on these cultures, many of the people of the East Asia region would not have been able to modernise and industrialise as quickly as [[Singapore]], [[Malaysia]], [[Hong Kong]], [[Taiwan]], [[Japan]], [[South Korea]] and even [[China]] have done.{{citation needed|date=July 2025}}

For example, the impact of the [[Vietnam War]] on Vietnam was devastating, but over the last few decades Vietnam has been re-developing in a very fast pace. Most scholars attribute the origins of this idea to futurologist [[Herman Kahn]]'s ''World Economic Development: 1979 and Beyond''.<ref>{{Citation |last=Hicks |first=George |title=Economic Development in East and Southeast Asia: Essays in Honor of Professor Shinichi Ichimura |date=1990 |page=25 |editor-last=Seiji Naya |chapter=Explaining the Success of the Four Little Dragons: A Survey |publisher=Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, and Honolulu: East-West Center |isbn=978-981-3035-63-8 |editor2-last=Akira Takayama}}{{pb}}{{cite journal | last1 = Hofstede | first1 = Geert | last2 = Harris Bond | first2 = Michael | year = 1988 | title = The Confucius Connection: From Cultural Roots to Economic Growth | url = http://www2.seminolestate.edu/falbritton/Summer%202009/FHI/Articles/Hofstede.confucious%20connection%20120505%20science%20direct.pdf | journal = Organizational Dynamics | volume = 16 | issue = 4| pages = 124–5 | doi = 10.1016/0090-2616(88)90009-5 | pmid = 4640478 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130626043702/http://www2.seminolestate.edu/falbritton/Summer%202009/FHI/Articles/Hofstede.confucious%20connection%20120505%20science%20direct.pdf |archive-date=26 June 2013 }}</ref>

Other studies, for example Cristobal Kay's ''Why East Asia Overtook Latin America: Agrarian Reform, Industrialization, and Development'', have attributed the Asian growth to other factors, for example the character of agrarian reforms, "state-craft" ([[state capacity]]), and interaction between agriculture and industry.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Kay |first=Cristóbal |year=2002 |title=Why East Asia overtook Latin America: Agrarian reform, industrialisation and development |url=http://homes.ieu.edu.tr/~ibagdadi/INT230/Christobal%20Kay%20-%20Why%20East%20Asia%20Overtook%20Latin%20America.pdf |journal=Third World Quarterly |volume=23 |issue=6 |pages=1073–1102 |doi=10.1080/0143659022000036649 |s2cid=154253600}}</ref>

Historical and current Confucianists were and are often environmentalists<ref name=":0" /> out of their respect for ''tian'' and the other aspects of nature and the "Principle" that comes from their unity and, more generally, harmony as a whole, which is "the basis for a sincere mind".<ref name=":9">{{Cite book |title=World Scripture: A Comparative Anthology of Sacred Texts |publisher=[[Paragon House|Paragon House Publishers]] |year=1995 |isbn=978-1-55778-723-1 |editor-last=Wilson |editor-first=Andrew |edition=1st paperback |location=St. Paul |page=19}}</ref>

===On Chinese martial arts===
After Confucianism had become the official 'state religion' in China, its influence penetrated all walks of life and all streams of thought in Chinese society for the generations to come. This did not exclude martial arts culture. Though in his own day, Confucius had rejected the practice of Martial Arts (with the exception of Archery), he did serve under rulers who used military power extensively to achieve their goals. In later centuries, Confucianism heavily influenced many educated martial artists of great influence, such as [[Sun Lutang]],{{Citation needed|date=February 2021}} especially from the 19th century onwards, when bare-handed martial arts in China became more widespread and had begun to more readily absorb philosophical influences from Confucianism, [[Buddhism]] and [[Daoism]].

==Criticism==
Confucius and Confucianism were opposed or criticised from the start, including [[Laozi]]'s philosophy and [[Mozi]]'s critique, and Legalists such as [[Han Fei]] ridiculed the idea that virtue would lead people to be orderly. In modern times, waves of opposition and vilification showed that Confucianism, instead of taking credit for the glories of Chinese civilisation, now had to take blame for its failures. The [[Taiping Rebellion]] described Confucianism sages as well as gods in [[Taoism]] and [[Buddhism]] as devils.

===Contradiction with modernist values===
{{See also|New Culture Movement}}
In the [[New Culture Movement]], [[Lu Xun]] criticised Confucianism for shaping Chinese people into the condition they had reached by the late [[Qing dynasty]]: his criticisms are expressed metaphorically in the work "[[Diary of a Madman (Lu Xun)|Diary of a Madman]]", in which traditional Chinese Confucian society is portrayed as feudalistic, hypocritical, socially cannibalistic, despotic, fostering a "slave mentality" favouring despotism, lack of critical thinking and blind obedience and worship of authority, fuelling a form of "Confucian authoritarianism" which persists into the present day.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2017-11-23 |orig-date=1918 |title=The True Story of Lu Xun |url=https://www.chinafile.com/library/nyrb-china-archive/ |access-date=2022-08-26 |website=ChinaFile |language=en}}</ref> Leftists during the [[Cultural Revolution]] described Confucius as the representative of the slave-owning class.<ref>{{Cite web |date=March 20, 2005 |title=The evil life of Confucius |url=https://people.reed.edu/~brashiek/syllabi/Poster/running.html#:~:text=2.,%E2%80%9COld%20Number%20Two%E2%80%9D%5D. |archive-url=https://perma-archives.org/warc/20240121070125/https://people.reed.edu/~brashiek/syllabi/Poster/running.html#:~:text=2.,%E2%80%9COld%20Number%20Two%E2%80%9D%5D. |archive-date=21 January 2024 |access-date=January 21, 2024 |website=Reed University |url-status=live }}</ref>

In [[South Korea]], there has long been criticism. Some South Koreans believe Confucianism has not contributed to the modernisation of South Korea. For example, South Korean writer Kim Kyong-il wrote a book in 1998 entitled "Confucius Must Die For the Nation to Live" ({{lang|ko|공자가 죽어야 나라가 산다}}, {{tlit|ko|gongjaga jug-eoya naraga sanda}}). Kim said that [[filial piety]] is one-sided and blind, and if it continues, social problems will continue as government keeps forcing Confucian filial obligations onto families.<ref>{{Cite web |date=23 September 1999 |script-title=ko:공자가 죽어야 나라가 산다고?&nbsp;– 시사저널 |url=http://www.sisapress.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=39088 |access-date=2012-06-10 |publisher=Sisapress.com}}</ref>

===Women in Confucian thought===
{{See also|Women in ancient and imperial China}}
Confucianism "largely defined the mainstream discourse on gender in China from the [[Han dynasty]] onward."<ref name=Adler/> The gender roles prescribed in the [[Three Obediences and Four Virtues]] became a cornerstone of the family, and thus, societal stability. The Three Obediences and Four Virtues is one of the moral standards for feudal etiquette to bind women.<ref name="Gao">{{Cite journal |last=Gao Xiongya |date=2003 |title=Women Existing for Men: Confucianism and Social Injustice against Women in China |journal=Race, Gender & Class |volume=10 |issue=3 |pages=114–125 |issn=1082-8354 |jstor=41675091}}</ref> Starting from the Han period, Confucians began to teach that a virtuous woman was supposed to follow the males in her family: the father before her marriage, the husband after she marries, and her sons in widowhood. In the later dynasties, more emphasis was placed on the virtue of chastity. The Song dynasty Confucian [[Cheng Yi (philosopher)|Cheng Yi]] stated that: "To starve to death is a small matter, but to lose one's chastity is a great matter."<ref name="ebrey" /> It was during the Song dynasty that the value of chastity was so severe, Confucian scholars criminalized the remarriage of widows.<ref name="Gao"/> Widows were revered and memorialised during the [[Ming dynasty|Ming]] and [[Qing dynasty|Qing]] periods. The principle of chaste widowhood was made an official institution during the Ming dynasty. This "[[Cult of widow chastity|cult of chastity]]" accordingly condemned many widows to poverty and loneliness by placing a social stigma on remarriage.<ref name="Adler">{{Cite web |last=Adler |first=Joseph A. |date=April 2005 |title=Daughter/Wife/Mother or Sage/Immortal/Bodhisattva? Women in the Teaching of Chinese Religions |url=http://www2.kenyon.edu/Depts/Religion/Fac/Adler/Writings/Women.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060320105840/http://www2.kenyon.edu/Depts/Religion/Fac/Adler/Writings/Women.htm |archive-date=20 March 2006 |access-date=12 July 2010 |website=ASIANetwork Exchange, vol. XIV, no. 2}} ([https://web.archive.org/web/20240130042107/https://www2.kenyon.edu/Depts/Religion/Fac/Adler/Writings/women.pdf Pdf version] archived January 30, 2024)</ref> Though the repercussions for widows at times went beyond poverty and loneliness, as for some the preservation of chastity resulted in suicide. The ideal of a chaste widow became an extremely high honor and esteem, especially for a woman who chose to end her life after her husband's death. Many instances of such acts were recorded in, Biographies of Virtuous Women, "a collection of stories of women who distinguished themselves by committing suicide after their husband’s deaths to guard their chastity and purity". Though it can be contested whether all these instances can be deemed self-sacrificing for the virtue of chastity, as it became common practice for women to be forced to commit suicide after their husband's death. This resulted from the honor which chaste widowhood garnered, lending itself to the husband's family as well as his clan or village.<ref name="Gao" />

For years, many modern scholars have regarded Confucianism as a sexist, patriarchal ideology that was historically damaging to Chinese women.<ref name="Gao" /><ref name="Rosenlee" />{{rp|15–16}} It has also been argued by some Chinese and Western writers that the rise of neo-Confucianism during the Song dynasty had led to a decline of status of women.<ref name="ebrey">{{Cite book |last=Patricia Buckley Ebrey |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GDPskRXfl5cC&pg=PA10 |title=Women and the Family in Chinese History |date=2002 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-415-28822-4 |pages=10–12, 24–25}}</ref>{{rp|10–12}} Some critics have also accused the prominent Song neo-Confucian scholar [[Zhu Xi]] for believing in the inferiority of women and that men and women need to be kept strictly separate,<ref>{{Cite book |last=Anders Hansson |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4Ibp1RTW0AoC&pg=PA46 |title=Chinese Outcasts: Discrimination and Emancipation in Late Imperial China | chapter=The Chinese Status System |publisher=Brill |year=1996 |isbn=978-90-04-10596-6 |page=46 |doi=10.1163/9789004487963_005 |s2cid=243925416}}</ref> while [[Sima Guang]] also believed that women should remain indoors and not deal with the matters of men in the outside world.<ref name="ebrey" />{{rp|24–25}}<ref>{{Cite book |last=Wang |first=Robin |title=Images of Women in Chinese Thought and Culture: Writings from the Pre-Qin Period to the Song Dynasty |publisher=Hackett Publishing |year=2003 |isbn=978-0-87220-651-9 |page=14 |chapter=Precepts for Family Life |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xQiJWZNQZfgC&pg=PA414}}</ref> Finally, scholars have discussed the attitudes toward women in Confucian texts such as [[Analects]]. In a much-discussed passage, women are grouped together with {{zhl|c=小人|l=small people}}, meaning people of low status or low morals) and described as being difficult to cultivate or deal with.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Lee Dian Rainey |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ID4gMCaLr0MC&pg=PA55 |title=Confucius and Confucianism: The Essentials |publisher=John Wiley and Sons |year=2010 |isbn=978-1-4443-2360-3 |page=55}}{{pb}}{{cite book | title= Analects | script-title=zh:論語 | script-chapter=zh:陽貨 | chapter= Yang Huo no. 25|chapter-url=https://ctext.org/dictionary.pl?if=gb&id=1561#s10028160 |author1= Confucius | quote= Original text: {{lang|zh-hant|唯女子與小人爲難養也，近之則不孫，遠之則怨。}}}}{{pb}}{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wpcSq6aTcgMC&pg=PA5 |title=Reconceiving Women's Equality in China: A Critical Examination of Models of Sex Equality|author= Yuan Lijun |publisher=Lexington Books |date=2005|isbn=978-0-7391-1228-1 |pages=5–6}}</ref> Many traditional commentators and modern scholars have debated over the precise meaning of the passage, and whether Confucius referred to all women or just certain groups of women.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Qiu Chong ({{lang|zh-hant|邱崇}}) |date=December 2013 |title=Yi 'wei nü yu xiaoren wei nan yang ye' |script-title=zh:释 "唯女子与小人为难养也" |url=http://yj.nuist.edu.cn/ch/reader/create_pdf.aspx?file_no=20130621&year_id=2013&quarter_id=6&falg=1 |journal=Yuejiang Academic Journal |volume=6 |pages=141–145 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180405214741/http://yj.nuist.edu.cn/ch/reader/create_pdf.aspx?file_no=20130621&year_id=2013&quarter_id=6&falg=1 |archive-date=5 April 2018}}<br />The article points out the various disputes among traditional Confucian commentators on what the passage really means. It also summarizes the debate in contemporary academia regarding the phrase's meaning.</ref><ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Liao Mingchun (廖名春) |year=2012 |title="Wei nüzi yu xiaoren wei nan yang ye" liuzhu ji xinjie |script-title=zh:“唯女子与小人为难养也”疏注及新解 |url=https://www.rujiazg.com/article/11256 |magazine=Renwen Zazhi (人文雜志) |issue=6 |access-date=2023-03-17}}</ref>

Further analysis suggests, however, that women's place in Confucian society may be more complex.<ref name="Adler" /> During the Han dynasty period, the influential Confucian text ''[[Lessons for Women]]'' was written by [[Ban Zhao]] (45–114&nbsp;CE) to instruct her daughters how to be proper Confucian wives and mothers, that is, to be silent, hard-working, and compliant. She stresses the complementarity and equal importance of the male and female roles according to yin-yang theory, but she clearly accepts the dominance of the male. However, she does present education and literary power as important for women. In later dynasties, a number of women took advantage of the Confucian acknowledgment of education to become independent in thought.<ref name="Adler" />

Joseph A. Adler points out that "Neo-Confucian writings do not necessarily reflect either the prevailing social practices or the scholars' own attitudes and practices in regard to actual women."<ref name=Adler/> Matthew Sommers has also indicated that the Qing dynasty government began to realise the utopian nature of enforcing the "cult of chastity" and began to allow practices such as widow remarrying to stand.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Sommers |first=Matthew |title=Sex, Law and Society in Late Imperial China |date=2000 |publisher=Stanford University Press |location=Stanford |page=319}}</ref> Moreover, some Confucian texts like [[Dong Zhongshu]]'s ''[[Luxuriant Dew of the Spring and Autumn Annals]]'' have passages that suggest a more equal relationship between a husband and his wife.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Dong Zhongshu |title=Chunqiu Fanlu |date=1988 |language=zh |script-title=zh:春秋繁露 |chapter=Ji Yi |script-chapter=zh:基義 |author-link=Dong Zhongshu |orig-date=100s BC |chapter-url=http://ctext.org/chun-qiu-fan-lu/ji-yi/zh |via=中國哲學書電子化計劃}}</ref> More recently, some scholars have also begun to discuss the viability of constructing a "Confucian feminism".<ref name="Rosenlee">{{Cite book |last=Rosenlee |first=Li-Hsiang Lisa |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yTvLQbaH81wC&pg=PA16 |title=Confucianism and Women: A Philosophical Interpretation |publisher=State University of New York Press |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-7914-6750-3 |pages=4, 15–16, 149–160}}</ref>{{rp|4, 149–160}}

==Chinese Rites controversy==
{{main|Chinese Rites controversy}}
Ever since Europeans first encountered Confucianism, the issue of how Confucianism should be classified has been subject to debate. In the 16th and the 17th centuries, the earliest European arrivals in China, the Christian [[Jesuits]], considered Confucianism to be an ethical system, not a religion, and one that was compatible with Christianity.<ref name="Elman">{{Harvnb|Elman|2005|p=112}}.</ref> The Jesuits, including [[Matteo Ricci]], saw Chinese rituals as "civil rituals" that could co-exist alongside the spiritual rituals of Catholicism.<ref name="Elman" />

By the early 18th century, this initial portrayal was rejected by the [[Dominican Order|Dominicans]] and [[Franciscans]], creating a dispute among Catholics in [[East Asia]] that was known as the "Rites Controversy".<ref name="Gunn">{{Harvnb|Gunn|2003|p=108}}.</ref> The Dominicans and Franciscans argued that [[Chinese ancestral worship]] was a form of idolatry that was contradictory to the tenets of Christianity. This view was reinforced by [[Pope Benedict XIV]], who ordered a ban on Chinese rituals,<ref name="Gunn" /> though this ban was re-assessed and repealed in 1939 by [[Pope Pius XII]], provided that such traditions harmonize with the true and authentic spirit of the liturgy.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Sacrosanctum concilium |url=https://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19631204_sacrosanctum-concilium_en.html |access-date=2023-03-17 |website=www.vatican.va}}</ref>

Some critics view Confucianism as definitely [[pantheism|pantheistic]] and [[nontheism|nontheistic]], in that it is not based on the belief in the supernatural or in a personal god existing separate from the temporal plane.{{sfnb|Adler|2014|p=12}}<ref name="Yang">{{Harvnb|Yang|1961|p=26}}.</ref> Confucius' views about ''tian'' and about the divine providence ruling the world, can be found above (in this page) and in Analects 6:26, 7:22, and 9:12, for example. On spirituality, Confucius said to Chi Lu, one of his students: "You are not yet able to serve men, how can you serve spirits?"<ref name="Sinaiko">{{Harvnb|Sinaiko|1998|p=176}}.</ref> Attributes such as [[ancestor worship]], [[ritual]], and [[sacrifice]] were advocated by Confucius as necessary for social harmony; these attributes may be traced to the traditional [[Chinese folk religion]].

Scholars recognise that classification ultimately depends on how one defines religion. Using stricter definitions of religion, Confucianism has been described as a moral science or philosophy.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Centre for Confucian Science (Korea) |url=http://terpconnect.umd.edu/~tkang/welcome_files/religion.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090716073420/http://terpconnect.umd.edu/~tkang/welcome_files/religion.htm |archive-date=16 July 2009}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Introduction to Confucianism |url=http://urantiabook.org/archive/readers/601_confucianism.htm |website=urantiabook.org}}</ref> But using a broader definition, such as [[Frederick Streng]]'s characterisation of religion as "a means of ultimate transformation",<ref>Streng, Frederick, "Understanding Religious Life," 3rd ed. (1985), p. 2</ref> Confucianism could be described as a "sociopolitical doctrine having religious qualities".<ref name="Yang" /> With the latter definition, Confucianism is religious, even if non-theistic, in the sense that it "performs some of the basic psycho-social functions of full-fledged religions".<ref name="Yang" />

==See also==<!-- Please respect alphabetical order -->
{{columns-list|colwidth=15em|
* [[Chinese culture]]
* [[Chinese folk religion]]
* [[Confucian art]]
* [[Confucian church]]
* [[Confucian view of marriage]]
* [[Confucianism in Indonesia]]
* [[Confucianism in the United States]]
* [[Confucius Institute]]
* [[Edo Neo-Confucianism]]
* [[Family as a model for the state]]
* [[Korean Confucianism]]
* [[Neo-Confucianism]]
* [[Religious Confucianism]]
* [[Sinology]]
* [[Taoism]]
* [[Temple of Confucius]]
* [[List of Confucian states and dynasties]]
}}

==Notes==
{{reflist|group=note|1}}

==Citations==
{{reflist}}

==Bibliography==
{{Refbegin|40em}}
* {{Cite conference |last=Adler |first=Joseph A. |year=2020 |orig-date=2006 |title=Confucianism as a Religious Tradition: Linguistic and Methodological Problems |url=https://www2.kenyon.edu/Depts/Religion/Fac/Adler/Writings/Confucianism_as_Religious_Tradition.pdf<!--http://www2.kenyon.edu/Depts/Religion/Fac/Adler/Writings/Still%20Hazy%20-%20Minzu.pdf--> |conference=Confucianism in Dialogue with Cultures and Religions: A Conference in Honor of Professor Tu Weiming |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220123231845/https://www2.kenyon.edu/Depts/Religion/Fac/Adler/Writings/Confucianism_as_Religious_Tradition.pdf<!--https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221010/http://www2.kenyon.edu/Depts/Religion/Fac/Adler/Writings/Still%20Hazy%20-%20Minzu.pdf--> |archive-date=2022-01-23 |ref={{sfnref|Adler|2014}} |url-status=live |place=University of California at Berkeley}}
* {{Cite book |last=William Theodore De Bary |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Gb0RcMQ-sOkC |title=Neo-Confucian Education: The Formative Stage |publisher=University of California Press |year=1989 |isbn=978-0-520-06393-8 |page=455}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Billioud |first1=Sébastien |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jZLxCQAAQBAJ |title=The Sage and the People: The Confucian Revival in China |last2=Thoraval |first2=Joël |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2015 |isbn=978-0-19-025814-6}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Billioud |first=Sébastien |year=2010 |title=Carrying the Confucian Torch to the Masses: The Challenge of Structuring the Confucian Revival in the People's Republic of China |url=http://www.oriens-extremus.de/inhalt/pdf/49/OE49-09.pdf |url-status=live |journal=Oriens Extremus |publisher=Harrassowitz Verlag |volume=49 |jstor=i24047714 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221010/http://www.oriens-extremus.de/inhalt/pdf/49/OE49-09.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-10}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Clart |first=Philip |year=2003 |title=Confucius and the Mediums: Is There a "Popular Confucianism"? |url=http://home.uni-leipzig.de/clartp/Clart%202003.pdf |url-status=live |journal=T'oung Pao |publisher=Brill |volume=89 |issue=1/3 |pages=1–38 |doi=10.1163/156853203322691301 |jstor=4528921 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221010/http://home.uni-leipzig.de/clartp/Clart%202003.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-10}}
* {{Cite book |last=Chan |first=Joseph |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VW2YDwAAQBAJ |title=Confucian Perfectionism: A Political Philosophy for Modern Times |publisher=Princeton University Press |year=2013 |isbn=978-0-691-16816-6}}
* {{Cite book |last=Chen Yong |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=I-JpRmACSdYC |title=Confucianism as Religion: Controversies and Consequences |publisher=Brill |year=2012 |isbn=978-90-04-24373-6 |ref={{sfnref|Chen|2012}}}}
* {{Cite book |last=Creel |first=Herrlee Glessner |title=Confucius and the Chinese Way |publisher=Harper Torchbooks |year=1949 |location=New York |author-link=Herrlee Creel}}
* {{Cite book |last=John W. Dardess |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OvdqvKxbCc4C |title=Confucianism and Autocracy: Professional Elites in the Founding of the Ming Dynasty |publisher=University of California Press |year=1983 |isbn=978-0-520-04733-4}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Didier |first=John C. |year=2009 |title=In and Outside the Square: The Sky and the Power of Belief in Ancient China and the World, c. 4500 BC – AD 200 |journal=[[Sino-Platonic Papers]] |issue=192}} 
**''[http://sino-platonic.org/complete/spp192_vol1.pdf Volume I: The Ancient Eurasian World and the Celestial Pivot]''.
**''[http://sino-platonic.org/complete/spp192_vol2.pdf Volume II: Representations and Identities of High Powers in Neolithic and Bronze China]''.
**''[http://sino-platonic.org/complete/spp192_vol3.pdf Volume III: Terrestrial and Celestial Transformations in Zhou and Early-Imperial China]''.
* {{Citation |last=Elman |first=Benjamin A. |title=On Their Own Terms: Science in China, 1550–1900 |year=2005 |publisher=Harvard University Press |isbn=978-0-674-01685-9}}.
* {{Cite journal |last1=Fan Lizhu |last2=Chen Na |year=2015 |title=The Religiousness of "Confucianism" and the Revival of Confucian Religion in China Today |journal=Cultural Diversity in China |volume=1 |issue=1 |pages=27–43 |doi=10.1515/cdc-2015-0005 |issn=2353-7795 |ref={{sfnref|Fan|Chen|2015}} |doi-access=free}}
* {{Citation |last1=Fan Lizhu |title=The Presence and Future of Humanity in the Cosmos |date=18–23 March 2015a |contribution=Revival of Confucianism and Reconstruction of Chinese Identity |place=Tokyo |publisher=ICU |ref={{sfnref|Fan|Chen|2015a}} |last2=Chen Na}}.
* {{Cite book |last=Feuchtwang |first=Stephan |title=Religions in the Modern World: Traditions and Transformations |publisher=Routledge |year=2016 |isbn=978-1-317-43960-8 |editor-last=Woodhead |editor-first=Linda |edition=3nd |location=London |pages=143–172 |chapter=Chinese religions |author-link=Stephan Feuchtwang |editor-last2=Kawanami |editor-first2=Hiroko |editor-last3=Partridge |editor-first3=Christopher H.}}
* {{Cite book |last=Fingarette |first=Herbert |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lawUAAAAQBAJ |title=Confucius: The Secular as Sacred |publisher=Harper |year=1972 |isbn=978-1-4786-0866-0 |location=New York |author-link=Herbert Fingarette}}
* {{Cite book |last=Fung Yiu-ming |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=w8vSE2lN0H4C |title=Teaching Confucianism |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-19-804256-3 |editor-last=Richey |editor-first=Jeffrey |pages=157–186 |chapter=Problematizing Contemporary Confucianism in East Asia |ref={{sfnref|Fung|2008}}}}
* {{Cite book |last=Gardner |first=Daniel K. |title=Confucianism: a very short introduction |date=2014 |publisher=Oxford Univ. Press |isbn=978-0-19-539891-5 |series= |location=Oxford}}
* {{Citation |last=Gunn |first=Geoffrey C. |title=First Globalization: The Eurasian Exchange, 1500 to 1800 |year=2003 |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |isbn=978-0-7425-2662-4}}.
* {{Citation |last=Haynes |first=Jeffrey |title=Routledge Handbook of Religion and Politics |year=2008 |publisher=Taylor & Francis |isbn=978-0-415-41455-5}}.
* {{Cite magazine |last=Hsu |first=Daniel |date=16 November 2014 |title=The Civil Theology of Confucius' "Tian" Symbol |url=https://voegelinview.com/civil-theology-confucius-tian-symbol/ |url-status=dead |magazine=Voegelin View |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191224202106/https://voegelinview.com/civil-theology-confucius-tian-symbol/ |archive-date=24 December 2019 |access-date=25 February 2018}}
* {{Cite book |last=Ivanhoe |first=Philip J. |title=Confucian Moral Self Cultivation |publisher=Hackett Publishing |year=2000 |isbn=978-0-87220-508-6 |edition=2nd rev. |location=Indianapolis |author-link=Philip J. Ivanhoe}}
* {{Cite book |last=Libbrecht |first=Ulrich |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rmT3ZHGxJPgC |title=Within the Four Seas{{nbsp}}...: Introduction to Comparative Philosophy |publisher=Peeters Publishers |year=2007 |isbn=978-90-429-1812-2 |author-link=Ulrich Libbrecht}}
* {{Citation |last=Littlejohn |first=Ronnie |title=Confucianism: An Introduction |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_RZe8Hr57NEC |year=2010 |publisher=I.B. Tauris |isbn=978-1-84885-174-0}}.
* {{Cite book |last=Nivison |first=David S. |title=The Ways of Confucianism: Investigations in Chinese Philosophy |publisher=Open Court Press |year=1996 |isbn=978-0-8126-9340-9 |location=Chicago}}
* {{Cite conference |last=Payette |first=Alex |date=19–24 July 2014 |title=Panel RC43: Role of Religion in Political Life |url=http://paperroom.ipsa.org/papers/paper_30036.pdf |conference=23rd World Congress of Political Science |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171023011728/http://paperroom.ipsa.org/papers/paper_30036.pdf |archive-date=23 October 2017 |access-date=9 May 2015 |contribution=Shenzhen's Kongshengtang: Religious Confucianism and Local Moral Governance |url-status=dead}}
* {{Cite book |last=Pankenier |first=David W. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wUuyAAAAQBAJ |title=Astrology and Cosmology in Early China |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2013 |isbn=978-1-107-00672-0}}
* {{Cite book |last=Rosenlee |first=Lisa Li-Hsiang |url=https://books.google.com/books?id= |title=Confucianism and Women: A Philosophical Interpretation |publisher=SUNY Press |year=2012 |isbn=978-0-7914-8179-0 |page=164}}
* {{Citation |last1=Shen Qingsong |title=Confucian Ethics in Retrospect and Prospect |year=2007 |publisher=Council for Research in Values and Philosophy |isbn=978-1-56518-245-5 |ref={{sfnref|Shen|Shun|2007}} |last2=Shun Kwong-loi}}.
* {{Citation |last=Sinaiko |first=Herman L. |title=Reclaiming the Canon: Essays on Philosophy, Poetry, and History |url=https://archive.org/details/reclaimingcanone00sina |year=1998 |publisher=Yale University Press |isbn=978-0-300-06529-9}}.
* {{Cite journal |last=Tay |first=Wei Leong |year=2010 |title=Kang Youwei: The Martin Luther of Confucianism and His Vision of Confucian Modernity and Nation |url=http://utcp.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp/publications/pdf/UTCPBooklet17_08_Tay.pdf |url-status=live |journal=Secularization, Religion and the State |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221010/http://utcp.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp/publications/pdf/UTCPBooklet17_08_Tay.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-10}}
* {{Cite book |last=Woo |first=Terry Tak-ling |title=World religions: Eastern traditions |date=2019 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-087549-7 |editor-last=Amore |editor-first=Roy C. |edition=5th |location=Oxford New York |chapter=Chinese & Korean Traditions |editor-last2=Hussain |editor-first2=Amir |editor-last3=Oxtoby |editor-first3=Willard Gurdon}}
* {{Cite book |last=Yang |first=C.K. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=N2d09EhGBgkC |title=Religion in Chinese Society; a Study of Contemporary Social Functions of Religion and Some of Their Historical Factors |publisher=University of California Press |year=1961 |isbn=978-0-520-01371-1 |location=Berkeley |author-link=C. K. Yang (sociologist)}}
* {{Cite book |last=Yao Xinzhong |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tAE2OJ9bPG0C |title=An Introduction to Confucianism |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2000 |isbn=978-0-521-64312-2 |ref={{sfnref|Yao|2000}} |author-link=Xinzhong Yao}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Zhou Youguang |author-link=Zhou Youguang |year=2012 |title=To Inherit the Ancient Teachings of Confucius and Mencius and Establish Modern Confucianism |url=http://www.sino-platonic.org/complete/spp226_zhou_youguang_modern_confucianism.pdf |url-status=live |journal=[[Sino-Platonic Papers]] |issue=226 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221010/http://www.sino-platonic.org/complete/spp226_zhou_youguang_modern_confucianism.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-10 |ref={{sfnref|Zhou|2012}}}}
{{Refend}}

'''Translations of the ''Analects'''''
* [http://www.sacred-texts.com/cfu/conf1.htm Confucian Analects] (1893) Translated by James Legge.
* ''The Analects of Confucius'' (1915; rpr. NY: Paragon, 1968). Translated by [[William Edward Soothill]].
* ''The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation'' (New York: Ballantine, 1998). Translated by Roger T. Ames, Henry Rosemont.
* ''Confucius: The Analects (Lun yü)'' (London: Penguin, 1979; rpr. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press, 1992). Translated by [[D.C. Lau]].
* ''The Analects of Confucius (Lun Yu)'' (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997). Translated by Chichung Huang.
* ''The Analects of Confucius'' (New York: W.W. Norton, 1997). Translated by Simon Leys.
* ''Analects: With Selections from Traditional Commentaries'' (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2003). Translated by Edward Slingerland.

==External links==
{{Sister project links|commonscat=Confucianism}}
* {{cite IEP |url-id=confuciu |title=Confucius}}
* {{cite IEP |url-id=neo-conf |title=Neo-Confucian Philosophy}}
* [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/confucius/#ConPol/ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Entry: Confucius]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20150619113741/http://www.interfaith.org/confucianism/ Interfaith Online: Confucianism]
* [http://www.sacred-texts.com/cfu/index.htm Confucian Documents] at the Internet Sacred Texts Archive.

'''Institutional'''
* [http://www.rujiazg.com/ China Confucian Philosophy]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20150814223204/http://www.rjzg.net/ China Confucian Religion]
* [http://www.chinakongzi.org/ China Kongzi Network]

{{navboxes
|list=
{{Philosophy topics}}
{{Religion in China}}
{{Religion topics}}
{{Chinese philosophy}}
{{Social philosophy}}
{{Political philosophy}}
{{Confucian texts}}
}}
{{Authority control}}

[[Category:Confucianism| ]]
[[Category:Chinese philosophy]]
[[Category:East Asian philosophy]]
[[Category:East Asian religions]]
[[Category:Eponymous political ideologies]]
[[Category:Religious ethics]]
[[Category:Religion in China]]
[[Category:Schools and traditions in ancient Chinese philosophy]]
[[Category:Three teachings]]
[[Category:Polytheism]]