View source for Aether theories

{{Short description|Set of theories}}

In the history of [[physics]], '''aether theories''' (or '''ether theories''') proposed the existence of a medium, a space-filling substance or field as a [[transmission medium]] for the propagation of electromagnetic or gravitational forces. Since the development of [[special relativity]], theories using a substantial aether fell out of use in [[modern physics]], and are now replaced by more abstract models.

This [[early modern]] aether has little in common with the [[Aether (classical element)|aether]] of classical elements from which the name was borrowed. The assorted theories embody the various conceptions of this [[Medium (optics)|medium]] and [[Substance theory|substance]].

== Historical models ==
===Luminiferous aether===
{{Main|Luminiferous aether|History of special relativity}}

[[Isaac Newton]] suggests the existence of an aether in the Third Book of ''[[Opticks]]'' (1st ed. 1704; 2nd ed. 1718): "Doth not this aethereal medium in passing out of water, glass, crystal, and other compact and dense bodies in empty spaces, grow denser and denser by degrees, and by that means refract the rays of light not in a point, but by bending them gradually in curve lines? ...Is not this medium much rarer within the dense bodies of the Sun, stars, planets and comets, than in the empty celestial space between them? And in passing from them to great distances, doth it not grow denser and denser perpetually, and thereby cause the gravity of those great bodies towards one another, and of their parts towards the bodies; every body endeavouring to go from the denser parts of the medium towards the rarer?"<ref>[[Isaac Newton]], [http://www.newtonproject.sussex.ac.uk/view/texts/normalized/NATP00051 The Third Book] of ''[[Opticks]]'' (2nd ed. 1718).</ref>

In the 19th century, [[luminiferous aether]] (or ether), meaning light-bearing aether, was a theorized medium for the propagation of light. [[James Clerk Maxwell]] developed a model to explain electric and magnetic phenomena using the aether, a model that led to what are now called [[Maxwell's equations]] and the understanding that light is an electromagnetic wave.<ref>James Clerk Maxwell: "[[wikisource: A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism/Part IV/Chapter XX|A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism/Part IV/Chapter XX]]"</ref> Later, a series of increasingly careful experiments were carried out in the late 1800s, including the [[Michelson–Morley experiment]], to try to detect the motion of Earth through the aether, but no drag was detected. A range of proposed [[Aether drag hypothesis|aether-dragging theories]] could explain the null result but these were more complex, and tended to use arbitrary-looking coefficients and physical assumptions. [[Joseph Larmor]] discussed the aether in terms of a moving magnetic field caused by the acceleration of electrons.

[[Hendrik Lorentz]] and [[George Francis FitzGerald]] offered, within the framework of [[Lorentz ether theory]], an explanation of how the Michelson–Morley experiment could have failed to detect motion through the aether. However, the initial Lorentz theory predicted that motion through the aether would create a [[birefringence]] effect, which [[John William Strutt, 3rd Baron Rayleigh|Rayleigh]] and [[DeWitt Bristol Brace|Brace]] tested and failed to find ([[Experiments of Rayleigh and Brace]]). All of those results required the full application of the [[Lorentz transformation]] by Lorentz and [[Joseph Larmor]] in 1904.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Strutt|first=John William (Lord Rayleigh)|author-link=John William Strutt, 3rd Baron Rayleigh|date=December 1902|title=LXXIII. Does motion through the Æther cause double refraction?|url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14786440209462891|journal=The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science|language=en|volume=4|issue=24|pages=678–683|doi=10.1080/14786440209462891|issn=1941-5982}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Newburgh|first=R. G.|date=1973-01-01|title=Motional Effects in Retardation Plates and Mode Locking in Ring Lasers|url=https://www.osapublishing.org/ao/abstract.cfm?uri=ao-12-1-116|journal=Applied Optics|language=EN|volume=12|issue=1|pages=116–119|doi=10.1364/AO.12.000116|pmid=20125240|bibcode=1973ApOpt..12..116N |issn=2155-3165|url-access=subscription}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Schaffner|first=Kenneth F.|date=1974-03-01|title=Einstein Versus Lorentz: Research Programmes and the Logic of Comparative Theory Evaluation|url=https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1093/bjps/25.1.45|journal=The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science|language=en|volume=25|issue=1|pages=45–78|doi=10.1093/bjps/25.1.45|issn=0007-0882|url-access=subscription}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Wetzel|first=Reinhard A.|date=1913|title=The New Relativity in Physics|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1640709|journal=Science|volume=38|issue=979|pages=466–474|doi=10.1126/science.38.979.466|jstor=1640709|pmid=17808012|bibcode=1913Sci....38..466W |issn=0036-8075}}</ref> Summarizing the results of Michelson, Rayleigh and others, [[Hermann Weyl]] would later write that the aether had "betaken itself to the land of the shades in a final effort to elude the inquisitive search of the physicist".<ref>{{Cite book|last=Weyl|first=Hermann|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KCgZAQAAIAAJ|title=Space, Time, Matter|date=1922|publisher=Dutton|language=en|author-link=Hermann Weyl}}</ref> In addition to possessing more conceptual clarity, [[Albert Einstein]]'s 1905 [[special theory of relativity]] could explain all of the experimental results without referring to an aether at all. This eventually led most physicists to conclude that the earlier notion of a luminiferous aether was not a useful concept.

=== Mechanical gravitational aether ===
{{main|Mechanical explanations of gravitation}}

From the 16th until the late 19th century, gravitational effects had also been modeled using an aether. In a note at the end of his work "A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field", Maxwell discussed a model for gravity based on a medium similar to the one he used for the electromagnetic field. He concluded that the medium would have "an enormous intrinsic energy" and would necessarily have to be diminished in areas of mass. He could not "understand in what way a medium can possess such properties" so he did not pursue it further.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Maxwell |first=James Clerk |date=1864 |title=A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field |url=https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/A_Dynamical_Theory_of_the_Electromagnetic_Field/Part_IV#:~:text=Note%20on%20the%20Attraction%20of%20Gravitation }}</ref> The most well-known formulation is [[Le Sage's theory of gravitation]], although variations on the idea were entertained by [[Isaac Newton]], [[Bernhard Riemann]], and [[Lord Kelvin]]. For example, Kelvin published a historical note on Le Sage's model in 1872, noting that Le Sage's proposal disagreed with [[conservation of energy]]. Kelvin  suggested a possible way to salvage it using the Kelvin's [[vortex theory of the atom]]. That theory was extended by [[JJ Thomson]] but ultimately abandoned as not productive.<ref name="Kragh">{{cite journal |last1=Kragh |first1=Helge |title=The Vortex Atom: A Victorian Theory of Everything |journal=Centaurus |date=2002 |volume=44 |issue=1–2 |pages=32–114 |url=https://www.academia.edu/4084776 |accessdate=9 March 2019 |language=en |issn=0008-8994|doi=10.1034/j.1600-0498.2002.440102.x }}</ref>{{rp|56}} 

None of those concepts are considered to be viable by the scientific community today.

== Non-standard interpretations in modern physics ==
=== General relativity ===
{{Main|Einstein's views on the aether}}

Albert Einstein sometimes used the word ''aether'' for the gravitational field within [[general relativity]], but the only similarity of this relativistic aether concept with the [[Aether (classical element)|classical aether]] models lies in the presence of physical properties in space, which can be identified through [[Geodesics in general relativity|geodesics]]. As historians such as [[John Stachel]] argue, Einstein's views on the "new aether" are not in conflict with his abandonment of the aether in 1905. As Einstein himself pointed out, no "substance" and no state of motion can be attributed to that new aether.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Einstein: Ether and Relativity |url=https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Extras/Einstein_ether/ |access-date=2023-12-19 |website=Maths History |language=en}}</ref> Einstein's use of the word "aether" found little support in the scientific community, and played no role in the continuing development of modern physics.<ref name=kosta>{{Citation|author=Kostro, L.|chapter=An outline of the history of Einstein's relativistic ether concept|title=Studies in the history of general relativity |editor1=Jean Eisenstaedt |editor2=Anne J. Kox |volume=3|pages=260–280|isbn=978-0-8176-3479-7|publisher=Birkhäuser|location=Boston-Basel-Berlin|year=1992}}</ref><ref name=stach>{{Citation|author=Stachel, J.|title=Why Einstein reinvented the ether |journal=Physics World|volume=14 |issue=6 |year=2001|pages=55–56|doi=10.1088/2058-7058/14/6/33 }}</ref>

=== Quantum vacuum ===
{{Main article|Quantum vacuum state}}

[[Quantum mechanics]] can be used to describe [[spacetime]] as being non-empty at extremely small scales, fluctuating and generating [[pair production|particle pairs]] that appear and disappear incredibly quickly. It has been suggested by some such as [[Paul Dirac]]<ref name="Dirac, Paul 1951 p. 906">Dirac, Paul: "Is there an Aether?", Nature 168 (1951), p. 906.</ref> that this [[vacuum state|quantum vacuum]] may be the equivalent in modern physics of a particulate aether. However, Dirac's aether hypothesis was motivated by his dissatisfaction with [[quantum electrodynamics]], and it never gained support from the mainstream scientific community.<ref>{{Cite book
| author=Kragh, Helge
| date=2005
| title=Dirac. A Scientific Biography
| location=Cambridge
| publisher=Cambridge University Press
| isbn=978-0-521-01756-5
| pages=200–203}}</ref>

Physicist [[Robert B. Laughlin]] has suggested that the quantum vacuum could be viewed as a "relativistic ether".<ref>{{cite book|last=Laughlin|first=Robert B.|title=A Different Universe: Reinventing Physics from the Bottom Down|date=2005|publisher=Basic Books|location=NY, NY|isbn=978-0-465-03828-2|pages=[https://archive.org/details/differentunivers00laug/page/120 120–121]|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/differentunivers00laug/page/120}}</ref> [[Paul Davies]] writes that while the quantum vacuum resembles in some ways the old concept of the aether, the two differ in a key respect: the quantum vacuum "has no privileged reference frame, no state of rest relative to which a material body could be said to move."<ref>{{cite journal|first=Paul |last=Davies |author-link=Paul Davies |title=Shaking light from the void |journal=Nature |volume=382 |date=1996-08-29 |pages=761–762 |doi=10.1038/382761a0}}</ref>

=== Pilot waves ===
{{Main|Pilot wave|De Broglie–Bohm theory}}

[[Louis de Broglie]] stated, "Any particle, ever isolated, has to be imagined as in continuous "energetic contact" with a hidden medium."<ref name="deBroglieHiddenMedium">[http://aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, Volume 12, no.4, 1987]</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Petroni|first1=Nicola Cufaro|last2=Vigier|first2=Jean Pierre|year=1983|title=Dirac's aether in relativistic quantum mechanics|journal=Foundations of Physics|volume=13|issue=2|pages=253|bibcode=1983FoPh...13..253P|doi=10.1007/BF01889484|s2cid=14888007 |url=https://www.openaccessrepository.it/record/134735 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240424191711/https://www.openaccessrepository.it/record/134735 |url-status=dead |archive-date=April 24, 2024 |quote=It is shown that one can deduce the de Broglie waves as real collective Markov processes on the top of Dirac's aether|url-access=subscription}}</ref> However, as de Broglie pointed out, this medium "could not serve as a universal reference medium, as this would be contrary to relativity theory."<ref name="deBroglieHiddenMedium" />

==See also==
{{Cols}}
* [[Absolute space and time]]
* [[Apeiron (cosmology)]]
* [[Astral light]]
* [[Cosmology]]
* [[Frame-dragging]]
* [[Tests of general relativity]]
* [[Tests of special relativity]]
{{Colend}}

==References==
{{Reflist|30em}}

==Further reading==
* {{Cite book
|author=Darrigol, Olivier
|date=2000
|title=Electrodynamics from Ampère to Einstein
|url=https://archive.org/details/electrodynamicsf0000darr
|url-access=registration
|place=Oxford
|publisher=Clarendon Press
|isbn=978-0-19-850594-5
}}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Decaen |first1=Christopher A. |date=July 2004 |title=Aristotle's Aether and Contemporary Science |url=http://www.thomist.org/jourl/2004/July/2004%20July%20A%20Dec.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120305053917/http://www.thomist.org/jourl/2004/July/2004%20July%20A%20Dec.htm |url-status=dead |archive-date=2012-03-05 |journal=The Thomist |volume=68 |issue=3 |pages=375–4295 |doi=10.1353/tho.2004.0015 |s2cid=171374696 |access-date=2024-10-17|url-access=subscription }}
* Epple, M. (1998). "Topology, Matter, and Space, I: Topological Notions in 19th-Century Natural Philosophy", ''[[Archive for History of Exact Sciences]]'' 52: 297–392.
* {{Cite book
|author=Harman, P. H.
|date=1982
|title=Energy, Force and Matter: The Conceptual Development of Nineteenth Century Physics
|place=Cambridge
|publisher=Cambridge University Press
|isbn=978-0-521-28812-5
}}
* {{Cite EB1911 |last=Larmor |first=Joseph |authorlink=Joseph Larmor |wstitle=Aether |volume=1 |pages=292–297|short=x}}
* [[Oliver Lodge]], "Ether", ''Encyclopædia Britannica'', Thirteenth Edition (1926).
* {{Cite EB9 |last=Mackay |first=John Sturgeon |author-link=John Sturgeon Mackay |wstitle = Ether (2.) |volume= VIII | pages=655-658 |short=1 }}
* {{Cite book
|author=Schaffner, Kenneth F.
|date=1972
|title=Nineteenth-century Aether Theories
|publisher=Pergamon Press
|place= Oxford
|isbn=978-0-08-015674-3
}}
* {{Cite book
|author=Whittaker, Edmund Taylor
|date=1910
|title= [[A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity]]
|edition=1st
|place=Dublin
|publisher=Longman, Green and Co.
}}
* "[https://web.archive.org/web/20051227132715/http://maxwell.byu.edu/~spencerr/phys442/history.pdf A Ridiculously Brief History of Electricity and Magnetism]; Mostly from E. T. Whittaker's ''A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity'']{{-"}}. ([[PDF]] format.)

[[Category:Aether theories| ]]
[[Category:Vacuum]]