View source for Yat

{{short description|Cyrillic letter}}
{{other uses}}
{{distinguish|text= [[Semisoft sign]] or latin letter [[B with stroke|Ƀ]]}}
<!-- real IPA is in //. Transliterations from the Cyrillic, etc. are in [], national spellings in ''italics''. IPAfa is used to make sure that old Cyrillic is displayed properly. Please don't remove it. -->
{{Infobox grapheme
|script    = [[Cyrillic]]
|type      = [[Alphabet]]
|typedesc  = ic
|name      = Yat
|image     = [[File:Cyrillic letter Yat.svg|120px]]<br/>
[[File:Cyrillic letter Iotated Yat.svg|100px]]
|imagesize = 140px
|imagealt  = 
|phonemes  = [{{IPA link|æ}}], [{{IPA link|ɛ}}], [{{IPA link|e}}], [{{IPA link|i}}], [{{IPA link|j}}{{IPA link|a}}]
|number    = 
|fam1      = 
}}

[[Image:Russian letter Yat.svg|thumb|Cyrillic letter ''yat'', set in several fonts. Note that in [[italic type|italic]], the lower-case (''ѣ'') resembles the iotated yat.|right]]
[[Image:Italic Cyrillic Yat in Currall (1918).png|thumb|Alternate italic.|right]]
'''Yat''' or '''jat''' (Ѣ&nbsp;ѣ; italics: <span style="font-family: serif">''Ѣ&nbsp;ѣ''</span>) is the thirty-second letter of the [[Early Cyrillic alphabet|old Cyrillic alphabet]]. It is usually [[Romanization|romanized]] as E with a [[haček]]: ''Ě&nbsp;ě''.

There is also another version of yat, the '''iotated yat''' (majuscule: {{angbr|{{Slavonic|Ꙓ}}}}, minuscule: {{angbr|{{Slavonic|ꙓ}}}}), which is a Cyrillic character combining a [[Decimal I (Cyrillic)|decimal I]] and a yat. There was no numerical value for this letter and it was not in the [[Glagolitic alphabet]]. It was encoded in Unicode 5.1 at positions U+A652 and U+A653.

{{IPA notice}}

== Usage ==
Yat represented a Common Slavic long [[vowel]], usually [[Proto-Slavic language#Vowel notation|notated]] as {{angbr|ě}}. It is generally believed to have represented the sound {{IPAslink|æ}} or {{IPAslink|ɛ}}, like the pronunciation of {{angbr|a}} in "c'''a'''t" or {{angbr|e}} in "'''e'''gg", which was a [[Reflex (linguistics)|reflex]] of earlier [[Proto-Slavic]] *{{IPA|/ē/}} and *{{IPA|/aj/}}. That the sound represented by yat developed late in the history of Common Slavic, and is significant for its role in the [[Slavic second palatalization]] of the Slavic [[velar consonant]]s.

The [[Glagolitic alphabet]] contained only one letter for both yat {{angbr|{{resize|110%|{{script|Cyrs|ѣ}}}}}} and the Cyrillic [[iotated a]] {{angbr|{{resize|110%|{{script|Cyrs|ꙗ}}}}}}.{{sfnp|Mirchev|1978|p=118}} According to [[Kiril Mirchev]], this meant that {{angbr|{{resize|110%|{{script|Cyrs|a}}}}}} after {{angbr|{{big|{{script|Cyrs|i}}}}}} in the [[Thessaloniki]] dialect (which served as a basis for [[Old Church Slavonic]]) mutated into a wide vowel that resembled or was the same as yat ({{IPAslink|æ}}).{{sfnp|Mirchev|1978|p=119}}

To this day, the most archaic Bulgarian dialects, i.e., the [[Rup dialects|Rup]] and [[Moesian dialects]] feature a similar phonetic change where {{IPAslink|a}} after [[Iotation|iota]] and the formerly palatal consonants {{angbr|{{resize|110%|{{script|Cyrs|ж}}}}}} ({{IPAslink|ʒ}}), {{angbr|{{resize|110%|{{script|Cyrs|ш}}}}}} ({{IPAslink|ʃ}}) and {{angbr|{{resize|110%|{{script|Cyrs|ч}}}}}} ({{IPAslink|t͡ʃ}}) becomes {{IPAslink|æ}}, e.g. {{lang|bg|сто'''я'''х}} {{IPA|[stoˈjah]}} -> {{lang|bg|сто'''йê'''х}} {{IPA|[stoˈjæh]}} ("(I) was standing"), {{lang|bg|пи'''я'''ница}} {{IPA|[piˈjanit͡sɐ]}} -> {{lang|bg|пи'''йê'''ница}} {{IPA|[piˈjænit͡sɐ]}} ("drunkard"), {{lang|bg|ж'''а'''би}} {{IPA|[ˈʒabi]}} -> {{lang|bg|ж'''ê'''би}} {{IPA|[ˈʒæbi]}} ("frogs"), etc.{{sfnp|Mirchev|1978|p=119}} Dialects that still feature this phonetic change include the [[Razlog dialect]], the [[Smolyan dialect]], the [[Hvoyna dialect]], the [[Strandzha dialect]], individual subdialects in the [[Thracian dialect]], the [[Shumen dialect]], etc.{{sfnp|Stoykov|1993|pp=123, 127, 130, 135, 142}}{{sfnp|Atlas of Bulgarian Dialects|2001|pp=102, 105, 107, 109}}

This problem did not exist in the Cyrillic alphabet, which had two separate letters for yat and [[iotated a]], {{angbr|{{resize|110%|{{script|Cyrs|ѣ}}}}}} and {{angbr|{{resize|110%|{{script|Cyrs|ꙗ}}}}}}. Any subsequent mix-ups of yat and iotated a and/or other vowels in [[Old Church Slavonic#Middle Bulgarian|Middle Bulgarian]] manuscripts are owing to the ongoing transformation of the Bulgarian vowel and consonant system in the [[Late Middle Ages]].{{sfnp|Mirchev|1978|p=119-120}}

An extremely rare "iotated yat" form {{angbr|{{resize|110%|{{script|Cyrs|ꙓ}}}}}} also exists, documented only in Svyatoslav's Izbornik from 1073.

=== Standard reflexes ===
In various modern [[Slavic languages]], yat has [[Linguistic reconstruction|reflected]] into various vowels. For example, the Proto-Slavic root ''*bělъ'' "white" became:

*{{lang|ru|бел}} {{IPA|/bʲel/}} in [[Standard Russian]] (dialectal {{IPA|/bʲal/}}, {{IPA|/bʲijel/}} or even {{IPA|/bʲil/}} in some regions) 
*{{lang|uk|біл}} {{IPA|/bʲil/}} in [[Ukrainian language|Ukrainian]] and [[Rusyn language|Rusyn]]
*{{lang|be|бел}} {{IPA|/bʲel/}} in [[Belarusian language|Belarusian]]
*{{lang|bg|бял}} {{IPA|/bʲal/}} - {{lang|bg|бели}} {{IPA|/beli/}} in [[Bulgarian language|Bulgarian]] ({{lang|bg|бел}} {{IPA|/bel/}} - {{lang|bg|бели}} in Western dialects) 
*{{lang|mk|бел}} {{IPA|/bel/}} in [[Macedonian language|Macedonian]] 
*{{lang|sr|beo / beli}} in the standard [[Serbian language|Serbian]] [[Ekavian]] variant of [[Serbo-Croatian]] (genitive {{lang|sr|bela / belog(a)}})
*{{lang|sh|bil / bili}} in [[Ikavian]] [[Serbo-Croatian]]
*{{lang|sh|bijel / bijeli}} in the standard [[Bosnian language|Bosnian]], [[Croatian language|Croatian]], [[Montenegrin language|Montenegrin]] and [[Serbian language|Serbian]] [[Ijekavian]] variants of [[Serbo-Croatian]] (genitive {{lang|sh|bijela / bijelog(a)}}) 
*{{lang|sl|bél}} in [[Slovenian language|Slovenian]]
*{{lang|pl|biały}} in [[Polish language|Polish]] 
*{{lang|cs|bílý}} in [[Czech language|Czech]]
*{{lang|sk|biely}} in [[Slovak language|Slovak]].

===Other reflexes===
Other reflexes of yat exist; for example:
*Proto-Slavic ''*telěga'' / телѣга became {{lang|sh|taljige}} ({{lang|sh-cyrl|таљиге}}; '''ѣ > i''' reflex) in [[Serbo-Croatian]].
*Proto-Slavic ''*orěhъ'' / орѣхъ became {{lang|sh|orah}} ({{lang|sh-cyrl|орах}}; '''ѣ > a''' reflex) in [[Serbo-Croatian]].

===Confusion with other letters===
Due to these reflexes, yat no longer represented an independent phoneme but an already existing one, represented by another Cyrillic letter. As a result, children had to memorize by rote whether or not to write yat. Therefore, the letter was dropped in a series of [[orthography|orthographic]] reforms: in [[Serbian language|Serbian]] with the reform of [[Vuk Karadžić]], in [[Ukrainian language|Ukrainian-Ruthenian]] with the reform of [[Panteleimon Kulish]], later in [[Russian language|Russian]] and [[Belarusian language|Belarusian]] with the [[Reforms of Russian orthography#Post-revolution reform|Bolshevik reform in 1918]],<ref>{{Cite web|last=Mii|first=Mii|date=Dec 6, 2019|title=The Russian Spelling Reform of 1917/18 - Part II (Alphabet I)|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8sX6Bald8w|website=YouTube}}</ref> and in [[Bulgarian language|Bulgarian]] and [[Rusyn language|Carpathian dialects of Ruthenian language]] as late as 1945.

The letter is no longer used in the standard modern orthography of any of the Slavic languages written with the [[Cyrillic script]], but survives in Ukrainian (Ruthenian) liturgical and church texts of Church Slavonic in Ruthenian (Ukrainian) edition and in some written in the Russian [[recension]] of [[Church Slavonic language|Church Slavonic]]. It has, since 1991, found some favor in [[advertising]] to deliberately invoke an archaic or "old-timey" style.

===Bulgarian===
{{See also|Eastern South Slavic}}
{{multiple image
 | background color = #000000
 | width = 260
 | height = 200
 | direction = vertical
 | align = right
| caption_align = center
<!-- Header -->
 | header = {{font|size=115%|{{font color|yellow|Reflexes of Stressed Yat across Eastern South Slavic}}}}
<!--image 1-->
 | image1 =Yat Reflexes Hard Syllable.png 
 | caption1 = {{font color|yellow|Map no. 1: Before hard syllable/hard consonant}}
<!--image 2-->
 | image2 = Yat Reflexes Soft Syllable.png
 | caption2 = {{font color|yellow|Map no. 2: Before soft syllable/soft consonant}}
<!--image 3-->
 | image3 = Yat Reflexes Ts.png
 | caption3 = {{font color|yellow|Map no. 3: After Tse ⟨Цц⟩ (t͡s) }}
 | footer_background = #000000
 }}
The open articulation of yat (as {{IPAslink|æ}} or {{IPA|ja}}) and the reflexes of Proto-Slavic *tj/*ktĭ/*gtĭ and *dj as {{font|size=110%|⟨щ⟩}} ({{IPA|ʃt}}) and {{font|size=110%|⟨жд⟩}} ({{IPA|ʒd}}) have traditionally been considered the two most distinctive phonetic features of Old Bulgarian.<ref>{{cite book|title=Старобългарски език|trans-title=The Old Bulgarian Language|last=Mirchev|first=Kiril|year=2000|edition=II|location=Sofia|publisher=Faber|isbn=9549541584|pages=13}}</ref><ref name="Uni">{{cite journal|journal=Български език [Bulgarian language]|year=1978|volume=I|title=Единството на българския език в миналото и днес|trans-title=The Unity of the Bulgarian Language in the Present and the Past|language=bg|location=Sofia|publisher=Bulgarian Academy of Sciences|url=http://www.promacedonia.org/bugarash/ed/edinstvoto_makedonija_1.htm|pages=16–18}}</ref> Based on
* the preserved articulation of yat as {{IPAslink|æ}} in the remote eastern Albanian villages of [[Boboshticë]] and [[Drenovë]];{{sfnp|Stoykov|1993|pp=180}}<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=rHszAAAAIAAJ&q=%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%89%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0 Георгиева, Елена и Невена Тодорова, Българските народни говори, София 1986, с. 79.] (Georgieva, Elena and Nevena Todorova, Bulgarian dialects, Sofia 1986, p. 79.)</ref><ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=ngRhAAAAMAAJ&q=%D0%94%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%8F%D0%BD%D0%B5 Бояджиев, Тодор А. Помагало по българска диалектология, София 1984, с. 62.] (Boyadzhiev Todor A. "Handbook on Bulgarian Dialectology", Sofia, 1984, р. 62.)</ref><ref>[http://monoskop.org/images/7/73/Trubetzkoy_NS_Principles_of_Phonology.pdf Trubetzkoy, Nikolai. Principles_of_Phonology, Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press, 1977, p. 277, 279 (note 9)])</ref>
* preserved archaic Slavic toponyms in southern and eastern Albania, [[Thessaly]] and [[Epirus]] featuring ''ia'', ''ea'' or ''a'' in yat's etymological place, e.g., {{lang|el|Δρυάνιστα}} {{IPA|[ˈdrianista]}} or {{lang|el|Δρυανίτσα}} {{IPA|[drianˈit͡sa]}} (renamed [[Moschopotamos]] in 1926) from {{lang|mis|др'''ѣ'''нъ}}, "cornel-tree" (see also [[Dryanovo]]); {{lang|el|Λιασκοβέτσι}} {{IPA|[liaskovet͡si]}} (renamed [[:el:Λεπτοκαρυά Ιωαννίνων]] in 1927) from {{lang|mis|л'''ѣ'''ска}}, "hazel" (see also [[Lyaskovets]]); [[Labovë e Kryqit]] and [[Labovë e Madhe]] from {{lang|mis|хл'''ѣ'''бъ}}, "bread" (see also [[Hlyabovo]]), etc.;<ref name="Uni"/>{{sfn|Duridanov|1991|pp=66}}
* the consistent etymological use of {{angbr|{{resize|110%|{{script|Cyrs|ѣ}}}}}} at the [[Ohrid Literary School]] until the mid-1200s;{{sfn|Mirchev|1978|pp=120-122}}
* the use of ''ia'', ''ea'' or ''a'' in yat's etymological place in a number of toponyms in a 1019 Greek-language charter by Byzantine emperor [[Basil II]] "the Bulgar Slayer" relating to the newly created [[Theme of Bulgaria]], e.g., {{lang|el|Πριζδρ'''ιά'''να}} {{IPA|[prizdriˈana]}} for {{lang|mis|Приздр'''ѣ'''нъ}} ([[Prizren]]); {{lang|el|Τρ'''ιά'''διτζα}} {{IPA|[triˈadit͡sa]}} for {{lang|mis|С(т)р'''ѣ'''дьць}} ([[Sofia]]); {{lang|el|Πρίλ'''α'''πον}} {{IPA|[ˈprilapon]}} for {{lang|mis|Прил'''ѣ'''пъ}} ([[Prilep]]); {{lang|el|Δ'''εά'''βολις}} {{IPA|[deˈabolis]}} for the medieval fortress of {{lang|mis|Д'''ѣ'''волъ}} ([[Devol (Albania)|Devol]], now in eastern Albania); {{lang|el|Πρόσ'''α'''κου}} {{IPA|[ˈprosakon]}} for the medieval fortress of {{lang|mis|Прос'''ѣ'''къ}} ([[Prosek, North Macedonia|Prosek]]), etc.;{{sfn|Duridanov|1991|pp=66}}<ref>{{cite book|title=Български старини из Македония|trans-title=Bulgarian Historical Monuments in Macedonia|last=Ivanov|first=Yordan|edition=2nd Extended|year=1931|language=bg|publisher=Държавна печатница|location=Sofia|pages=550 and ff}}</ref>
* the use of ''ea'' or ''a'' in yat's etymological place in a number of local toponyms in the area of modern-day [[Strumica]] in a 1152 Greek-language charter by Byzantine emperor [[Manuel I Komnenos]], relating to the Holy Mother of God monastery in [[Veljusa]], e.g., {{lang|el|Λ'''εα'''σκοβίτζα}} {{IPA|[leaskoˈvit͡sa]}} for {{lang|mis|Л'''ѣ'''сковица}} ({{lang|mis|Лѣсковьць}}), {{lang|el|Λ'''εα'''πίτζα}} {{IPA|[leaˈpit͡sa]}} for {{lang|mis|Л'''ѣ'''пица}}, {{lang|el|Δρ'''ά'''νοβου}} {{IPA|[ˈdranovon]}} for {{lang|mis|Др'''ѣ'''ново}}, {{lang|el|Μπρ'''εα'''σνίκ}} {{IPA|[breasˈnik]}} for {{lang|mis|Бр'''ѣ'''зникъ}};{{sfn|Duridanov|1991|pp=66}}<ref>{{cite book|title=Български старини из Македония|trans-title=Bulgarian Historical Monuments in Macedonia|last=Ivanov|first=Yordan|edition=2nd Extended|year=1931|language=bg|publisher=Държавна печатница|location=Sofia|pages=77|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ey0vAAAAIAAJ&q=%D0%9B%D1%A3%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0}}</ref>
* the 16th-century Greek-Bulgarian lexicon from [[Vogatsiko|Bogatsko]] in southwestern [[Macedonia (region)|Macedonia]] written in [[Greek alphabet|Greek letters]], which featured ''ia'' in yat's etymological place, e.g., {{lang|el|μλ'''ια'''κο}}, mliako ("milk"); {{lang|el|ζελ'''ια'''ζo}}, želiazo ("iron"); {{lang|el|β'''ια'''τρο}}, viadro ("pale"); {{lang|el|βρ'''ια'''τενo}}, vriateno ("spindle"); {{lang|el|πoβ'''ια'''σμo}}, poviasmo ("distaff"); {{lang|el|β'''ια'''ζτi}}, viaždi ("eyebrows"); {{lang|el|κoλ'''ια'''νo}}, koliano ("knee"); {{lang|el|νεβ'''ια'''στα}}, neviasta ("bride"), {{lang|el|ρ'''ια'''κα}}, riaka ("river"), {{lang|el|β'''ια'''τερ}}, viater ("wind"), etc., indicating that the [[Kostur dialect]] was still [[Eastern Bulgarian dialects|yakavian]] at the time;{{sfn|Duridanov|1991|pp=66}}<ref>{{cite book|last1=Gianelli|first1=Ciro|last2=Vaillant|first2=Andre|title=Un lexique Macedonien du XVIe siècle|trans-title=A Macedonian Lexicon from the 16th Century|language=fr|location=Paris|publisher=Institut d'Études slaves de l'Université de Paris|year=1958|url=https://macedonia.kroraina.com/en/gv/index.html|pages=30, 32, 34, 35, 37, 38, 40, 41, 43}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Nichev|first=Aleksandar|title=Костурският българо-гръцки речник от XVI век|trans-title=The 16th-Century Bulgaro-Greek Dictionary from Kastoria|language=bg|publisher=St. Clement of Ohrid University Printing House|location=Sofia|year=1987}}</ref> etc. etc.
the entire areas of modern [[Bulgarian language|Bulgarian]] and [[Macedonian language|Macedonian]] are assumed to have been ѣkavian/yakavian until the [[Late Middle Ages]].{{sfn|Duridanov|1991|pp=66-67}}{{sfnp|Mirchev|1978|pp=120}}

In addition to the replacement of {{font|size=110%|⟨ꙗ⟩}} with {{font|size=110%|⟨ѣ⟩}} in a number of [[Old Church Slavonic#First Bulgarian Empire|Old]] and [[Old Church Slavonic#Middle Bulgarian|Middle Bulgarian]] Cyrillic manuscripts—reflecting the mutation of [[iotated a]] into {{IPAslink|æ}}, the opposite process of mutation of yat into [[palatalised consonant]] + {{IPAslink|a}} was also underway. The process affected primarily yat in stressed syllables followed by hard consonant, with multiple examples present in manuscripts from both West and East, e.g. the Grigorovich Prophetologion of the late 1100s (e.g., {{lang|mis|т'''ꙗ'''ло}} instead of {{lang|mis|т'''ѣ'''ло}}, "body"), the Tarnovo Gospel of 1273 (e.g, {{lang|mis|т'''ꙗ'''хъ}} instead of {{lang|mis|т'''ѣ'''хъ}}, "them"), the Strumitsa Apostle of the mid-1200s (e.g., {{lang|mis|пр'''ꙗ'''мѫдро}} instead of {{lang|mis|пр'''ѣ'''мѫдро}}, "all-wise"), etc.{{sfnp|Totomanova|2014|pp=75}}{{sfnp|Mirchev|1978|p=121}}

However, the most certain proof of yakavian pronunciation of {{font|size=110%|⟨ѣ⟩}}—and another confirmation that currently Ekavian dialects used to be Yakavian in the Middle Ages—comes from the use of hardened consonant + ''a'' in yat's etymological place. While individual examples of hardened {{font|size=110%|⟨[[Es (Cyrillic)|с]]⟩}} ({{IPAslink|s}}) or {{font|size=110%|⟨[[Er (Cyrillic)|р]]⟩}} ({{IPAslink|r}}) + {{font|size=110%|⟨[[A (Cyrillic)|а]]⟩}} can be found even in Old Bulgarian manuscripts, the mutation is most consistent after hardened {{font|size=110%|⟨[[Tse (Cyrillic)|ц]]⟩}} ({{IPAslink|t͡s}}) and {{font|size=110%|⟨[[Dze|{{script|Cyrs|ꙃ}}]]⟩}} ({{IPAslink|d͡z}}) in [[Old Church Slavonic#Middle Bulgarian|Middle Bulgarian]] manuscripts. Thus, the Strumitsa Apostle, for example, features hosts of examples, e.g., {{lang|bg|ц'''а'''ло}} instead of {{lang|bg|ц'''ѣ'''лo}} ("whole", neutr. sing.), {{lang|bg|ц'''а'''ловати}} instead of {{lang|bg|ц'''ѣ'''лoвати}} ("to kiss"), {{lang|bg|ц'''а'''ломѫдрьно}} instead of {{lang|bg|ц'''ѣ'''ломѫдрьно}} ("chastely"), {{lang|bg|рѫц'''а'''}} instead of {{lang|bg|рѫц'''ѣ'''}} ("hands", dual), etc. etc.{{sfnp|Totomanova|2014|pp=76}}{{sfnp|Mirchev|1978|pp=120}}

An opposite process of narrowing of yat into {{IPAslink|ɛ}} started in the west in the 1200s, with a first example of consistent replacement of {{font|size=110%|⟨ѣ⟩}} with {{font|size=110%|⟨[[Ye (Cyrillic)|є]]⟩}} in Tsar [[Constantine Tikh]]'s Virgin Charter of the early 1260s.{{sfnp|Mirchev|1978|p=20}} The Charter, which was written in [[Skopje]], predates the first Ekavian Serbian document (dated to 1289) by 15–20 years, which refutes the nationalistic claims of Serbian linguists, e.g. [[Aleksandar Belić]] that Ekavism is a uniquely Serbian phenomenon and confirms, e.g., [[Nicolaas van Wijk]]'s theory that it is a native Western Bulgarian development.<ref>{{cite book|title=Les langues slaves : de l'unité à la pluralité|trans-title=Slavic Languages: From Unity to Plurality|last=van Wijk|first=Nicolaas |author-link=Nicolaas van Wijk |publisher=Mouton & Co., 's-Gravenhage|edition=II|year=1956|language=fr|pages=110}}</ref>

Mirchev and Totomanova have linked the mutation of yat into {{IPAslink|ɛ}} to either consonant [[Palatalization (sound change)|depalatalization]] in stressed syllables or to unstressed syllables.{{sfnp|Totomanova|2014|pp=80-82}} Thus, those Bulgarian dialects that retained their palatalized consonants remained Yakavian in stressed syllables, whereas those that lost them moved towards Ekavism; unstressed yat, in turn, became {{IPAslink|ɛ}} practically everywhere.{{sfnp|Totomanova|2014|pp=82}} This eventually led to the current dialectal division of [[Eastern South Slavic]] into Eastern Bulgarian Yakavian and Western Bulgarian and Macedonian Ekavian.

The different reflexes of yat define the so-called yat boundary ({{lang|bg|ятова граница}}), which currently runs roughly from [[Nikopol, Bulgaria|Nikopol]] on the [[Danube]] to [[Thessaloniki]] on the [[Aegean Sea]]. West of that [[isogloss]], ''yat'' is always realized as {{IPAslink|ɛ}}. East of it, there are different types of yakavism. Standard Bulgarian's alternation of yat between {{IPA|/ja/}} or {{IPA|/ʲa/}} in stressed syllable before a hard syllable/consonant and {{IPA|/ɛ/}} in all other cases is only characteristic of the [[Balkan dialects]] (cf. Maps no. 1 & 2).

Examples of the alternation in the standard language (and the [[Balkan dialects]]) in the form (''stressed, followed by hard consonant/syllable'')→(''stressed, followed by soft consonant/syllable'')→(''unstressed'') follow below:

* {{lang|bg|б'''я'''л}} {{IPA|[ˈbʲal]}} ("white", masc. sing.) [adj.] → {{lang|bg|б'''е'''ли}} {{IPA|[ˈbɛli]}} ("white", pl.) [adj.] → {{lang|bg|б'''е'''лота}} {{IPA|[bɛloˈta]}} ("whiteness") [n.] 
* {{lang|bg|мл'''я'''ко}} {{IPA|[ˈmlʲako]}} ("milk") [n.] → {{lang|bg|мл'''е'''чен}} {{IPA|[ˈmlɛt͡ʃɛn]}} ("milky") [adj.] → {{lang|bg|мл'''е'''кар}} {{IPA|[mlɛˈkar]}} ("milkman") [n.] 
* {{lang|bg|п'''я'''на}} {{IPA|[ˈpʲanɐ]}} ("foam") [n.] → {{lang|bg|п'''е'''ня се}} {{IPA|[ˈpɛnʲɐ sɛ]}} ("to foam") [v.] → {{lang|bg|п'''е'''нлив}} {{IPA|[pɛnˈliv]}} ("foamy") [adj.]
* {{lang|bg|см'''я'''х}} {{IPA|[ˈsmʲah]}} ("laughter") [n.] → {{lang|bg|см'''е'''я се}} {{IPA|[ˈsmɛjɐ sɛ]}} ("to laugh") [v.] → {{lang|bg|см'''е'''хотворен}} {{IPA|[smɛhoˈtvɔrɛn]}} ("laughable") [adj.]
* {{lang|bg|усп'''я'''х}} {{IPA|[osˈpʲah]}} ("(I) succeeded") [v.] → {{lang|bg|усп'''е'''шен}} {{IPA|[osˈpɛʃɛn]}} ("successful") [adj.] → {{lang|bg|усп'''е'''ваемост}} {{IPA|[ospɛˈvaɛmost]}} ("success rate") [n.]
* {{lang|bg|бр'''я'''г}} {{IPA|[ˈbrʲak]}} ("coast") [n.] → {{lang|bg|крайбр'''е'''жен}} {{IPA|[krɐjˈbrɛʒɛn]}} ("coastal") [adj.] → {{lang|bg|бр'''е'''гът}} {{IPA|[brɛˈgɤt]}} ("the coast") [n.]

The [[Moesian dialects]] in the northeast and the [[Rup dialects]] in the southeast feature a variety of other alternations, most commonly {{IPA|/ja/}} or {{IPA|/ʲa/}} in stressed syllable before hard consonant/syllable, {{IPAslink|æ}} in stressed syllable before soft consonant/syllable and {{IPAslink|ɛ}} in unstressed syllables (cf. Maps no. 1 & 2). The open articulation as {{IPAslink|æ}} before hard consonant/syllable has survived only in isolated dialects, e.g., [[Banat Bulgarian dialect|Banat Bulgarian]] and in clusters along the ''yat boundary''. The open articulation as {{font|size=110%|⟨[[A (Cyrillic)|а]]⟩}} after hardened {{font|size=110%|⟨[[Tse (Cyrillic)|ц]]⟩}} ({{IPAslink|t͡s}}) survives as a remnant of former yakavism in a number of western Bulgarian and eastern Macedonian dialects (cf. Map no. 3).{{sfnp|Atlas of Bulgarian Dialects|2001|p=95}}

As the yat boundary is only one of many [[isogloss]]es that divides the dialects of [[Eastern South Slavic]] into Western and Eastern,<ref>Anna Lazarova, Vasil Rainov, On the minority languages in Bulgaria in Duisburg Papers on Research in Language and Culture Series, National, Regional and Minority Languages in Europe. Contributions to the Annual Conference 2009 of EFNIL in Dublin, issue 81, editor Gerhard Stickel, Peter Lang, 2010, ISBN 3631603657, pp. 97-106.</ref> the term "''[[Yat Isogloss Belt]]''" has recently superseded the term "''yat boundary''". The Belt unifies Yakavian and Ekavian dialects with mixed, Western and Eastern traits into a buffer zone that ensures a gradual transition between the two major dialect groups.

From the late 19th century until 1945, standard Bulgarian orthography did not reflect the {{IPA|/ja/}} and {{IPA|/ɛ/}} alternation and used the Cyrillic letter {{font|size=110%|⟨ѣ⟩}} for both in yat's etymological place. This was regarded as a way to maintain unity between Eastern and Western Bulgarians, as much of what was then seen as Western Bulgarian dialects was under foreign control. However, this also complicated orthography for a country that was generally Eastern-speaking. There were several attempts to restrict the use of the letter only to those word forms where there was a difference in pronunciation between Eastern and Western Bulgarian (e.g., in the failed orthographic reform of 1892 and in several proposals by professor [[Stefan Mladenov]] in the 1920s and 1930s), but the use of the letter remained largely etymological. In response, in the [[Interwar period]], the [[Bulgarian Communist Party]] started referring to the letter as a manifestation of "class elitism" and "Greater Bulgarian Chauvinism" and made its elimination a top priority.

Consequently, after Bulgaria's [[Bulgaria during World War II#Consequences and results|occupation by the Soviet Union]] in 1944 and the installation of a puppet government headed by the communists, {{font|size=110%|⟨ѣ⟩}} was summarily thrown of the Bulgarian alphabet and the spelling changed to conform to the Eastern pronunciation by an orthographic reform in 1945 despite any objections.<ref>Младенов, Стефан. Български етимологичен речник.</ref> After 1989, the elimination of yat from the alphabet has generally been regarded as a violation of the unity of the Bulgarian language,<ref>{{cite journal|journal=Bulgaria-Macedonia|issue=2|year=2017|last=Stoyanov|first=Rumen |script-title=bg:Езиковедски посегателства|trans-title=Linguistic Violations|issn=1312-0875|url=http://www.bulgariamakedonia.net/index.php?br=71&stat=969}}</ref> in particular, in right-leaning circles, and nationalistic parties like [[VMRO-BND]] have campaigned, unsuccessfully, for its reintroduction.

Notably, the [[Macedonian Patriotic Organization]], an organisation of [[Macedonian Bulgarian]] emigrants in [[North America]], continued to use {{font|size=110%|⟨ѣ⟩}} in the Bulgarian edition of newsletter, Macedonian Tribune, until it switched to an English-only version in the early 1990s.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Pelisterski |first1=Hristo |title=Our Oath |journal=Macedonian Tribune |date=February 17, 1927 |volume=1 |issue=9 |page=1}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |journal=Macedonian Tribune |title=Иванъ Михайловъ, легендарният вождъ на Македонското освободително движение, почина|trans-title=Ivan Mihailoff, Legendary Leader of the Macedonian Liberation Movement, Is Dead|date=September 20, 1990 |volume=64 |issue=3078 |url=https://macedoniandocuments.blogspot.com/2010/08/makedonska-tribuna.html|issn=0024-9009|pages=3}}</ref>

===Russian===
[[File:Fox Typewriter 24 with Russian layout.JPG|250px|thumb|Pre-revolution [[typewriter]] with Yat on the bottom row, between Ч and С.]]
[[File:Fathers and Sons cover - retouched.jpg|250px|thumb|Cover of 1880 edition of [[Ivan Turgenev|Turgenev]]'s ''[[Fathers and Sons (novel)|Fathers and Sons]]'', with yat in the title: {{lang|ru|дѣти}} is spelled {{lang|ru|дети}}.]]
{{multiple image
<!-- Essential parameters -->
| align     = right
| direction = vertical
| width     = 150<!-- Digits only; no "px" suffix, please -->

<!-- Image 1 -->
| image1    = Handwritten yat 2.png
| width1    = 
| alt1      = 
| caption1  =

<!-- Image 2 -->
| image2    = Cursive Cyrillic Yat in Magnus (1917).png
| width2    = 
| alt2      = 
| caption2  = Russian handwritten ''yat'' of the 19th and 20th centuries
}}

In [[Russian language|Russian]], written confusion between the yat and {{angbr|е}} appears in the earliest records; when exactly the distinction finally disappeared in speech is a topic of debate. Some scholars, for example W. K. Matthews, have placed the merger of the two sounds at the earliest historical phases (the 11th century or earlier), attributing its use until 1918 to [[Church Slavonic language|Church Slavonic]] influence. Within Russia itself, however, a consensus has found its way into university textbooks of historical grammar (e.g., [[Vyacheslav Ivanov (philologist)|V. V. Ivanov]]), that, taking all the dialects into account, the sounds remained predominantly distinct until the 18th century, at least under stress, and are distinct to this day in some localities. Meanwhile, the yat in [[Ukrainian language|Ukrainian]] usually merged in sound with {{IPA|/i/}} instead (see below).

The story of the letter yat and its elimination from the [[Russian alphabet]] makes for an interesting footnote in Russian cultural history. See [[Reforms of Russian orthography]] for details. A full list of words that were written with the letter yat at the beginning of 20th century can be found [[:ru:Ять|in the Russian Wikipedia]].

A few inflections and common words were distinguished in spelling by {{angbr|е}} / {{angbr|ѣ}} (for example: {{lang|ru|ѣ́сть / е́сть}} {{IPA|[ˈjesʲtʲ]}} "to eat" / "(there) is"; {{lang|ru|лѣчу́ / лечу́}} {{IPA|[lʲɪˈt͡ɕu]}} "I heal" / "I fly"; {{lang|ru|синѣ́е / си́нее}} {{IPA|[sʲɪˈnʲe.jɪ]}}, {{IPA|[ˈsʲi.nʲɪ.jɪ]}} "bluer" / "blue" (n.); {{lang|ru|вѣ́дѣніе / веде́ніе}} {{IPA|[ˈvʲe.dʲɪ.nʲjə]}}, {{IPA|[vʲɪˈdʲe.nʲjə]}} "knowledge" / "leadership").

The retention of the letter without discussion in the [[Peter I of Russia|Petrine]] reform of the Russian alphabet of 1708 indicates that it then still marked a distinct sound in the Moscow ''[[Koiné language|koiné]]'' of the time. However, in 1748 an early proposal for partial revision of the usage of {{angbr|ѣ}} was made by [[Vasily Kirillovich Trediakovsky|Vasily Trediakovsky]].<ref>{{Cite journal |title=Употребление буквы Ѣ в периодических изданиях XVIII–XIX вв.: узус и кодификация |journal=Медиалингвистика |url=https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/upotreblenie-bukvy-v-periodicheskih-izdaniyah-xviii-xix-vv-uzus-i-kodifikatsiya |last=Каверина |first=Валерия Витальевна |issue=4 |volume=8 |pages=336–350 |year=2021}}</ref> The [[polymath]] [[Mikhail Lomonosov|Lomonosov]] in his 1755 grammar noted that the sound of {{angbr|ѣ}} was scarcely distinguishable from that of the letter {{angbr|е}},<ref>{{Cite book |title=Россійская грамматика |last=Ломоносовъ |first=Михайло |publisher=Императорская Академія Наукъ |year=1755 |location=Санктпетербургъ |pages=49 |quote=буквы Е и Ѣ въ просторѣчіи едва имѣютъ чувствительную разность}}</ref> although he firmly defended their distinction in spelling.<ref>Ломоносовъ 1755:53-54</ref> A century later (1878) the philologist Grot stated flatly in his standard ''Russian orthography'' ({{lang|ru|Русское правописаніе}}, {{lang|ru-Latn|Russkoje pravopisanije}}) that in the common language there was no difference whatsoever between their pronunciations. However, [[dialect]]al studies in the 20th century have shown that, in certain regional dialects, a phonemically distinct reflex of *ě has still been retained.<ref>{{Cite book |title=Очерки русской диалектологии. Часть первая |last=Аванесов |first=Рубен Иванович |publisher=Государственное учебно-педагогическое издательство Министерства просвещения РСФСР |year=1949 |location=Москва |pages=41–47}}</ref>

[[File:Ять с точками.gif|250px|thumb|An extract from the third edition of ''[[Explanatory Dictionary of the Living Great Russian Language|Dal's Explanatory Dictionary]]'' showing ''yat'' with diaeresis in the words {{lang|ru|звѣ̈здка}} and {{lang|ru|звѣ̈здочка}} (third line); in the modern orthography these are spelled as {{lang|ru|звёздка}} and {{lang|ru|звёздочка}}.]]
Some reflexes of {{angbr|ѣ}} have further evolved into {{IPA|/jo/}}, especially in inflected forms of words where {{angbr|ѣ}} have become stressed, while the [[Lemma (morphology)|dictionary form]] has it unstressed. One such example is {{lang|ru|звѣзда}} {{IPA|[zvʲɪzˈda]}} "star" against {{lang|ru|звѣзды}} {{IPA|[ˈzvʲɵzdɨ]}} "stars". Some dictionaries used a ''yat'' with a [[Diaeresis (diacritic)|diaeresis]], {{angbr|ѣ̈}}, to denote this sound, in a similar fashion to the creation of the letter {{angbr|[[Yo (Cyrillic)|ё]]}}.

A proposal for spelling reform from the [[Russian Academy of Science]] in 1911 included, among other matters, the systematic elimination of the yat, but was declined at the highest level.{{Citation needed|date=January 2010}} According to [[Lev Uspensky]]'s [[Popular science|popular]] linguistics book ''A Word on Words'' ({{lang|ru|Слово о словах}}), yat was "the monster-letter, the scarecrow-letter ... which was washed with the tears of countless generations of Russian schoolchildren".<ref>Успенский, Лев: Слово о словах. Лениздат 1962. p. 148.</ref> The schoolchildren made use of [[mnemonic]] nonsense verses made up of words with {{angbr|ѣ}}:

{| align=center cellpadding=4
|-
| {{lang|ru|Бѣдный блѣдный бѣлый бѣсъ}} || {{IPA|[ˈbʲɛ.dnɨj ˈblʲɛ.dnɨj ˈbʲɛ.lɨj ˈbʲɛs]}} || The poor pale white demon
|-
| {{lang|ru|Убѣжалъ съ обѣдомъ въ лѣсъ}} || {{IPA|[u.bʲɪˈʐal sɐˈbʲɛ.dəm ˈvlʲɛs]}} || Ran off with lunch into the forest
|-
| '''...''' || '''...''' || '''...'''
|}

The spelling reform was promulgated by the [[Russian Provisional Government, 1917|Provisional Government]] in the summer of 1917. However, it was not implemented under the prevailing conditions. After the [[Bolshevik Revolution]], the new regime took up the Provisional Drafts, implementing them minor deviations.<ref>{{cite web
|title = Декрет о введении нового правописания (Decree on introduction of new orthography)
|work = Известия В.Ц.И.К. 13 October 1918, #223 (487)
|year = 1917
|url = http://bibliography.ufacom.ru/method/dekret.html
|language = ru
|access-date = 2009-03-15}}
</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Comrie |first1=Bernard |last2=Stone |first2=Gerald |last3=Polinsky |first3=Maria |title=The Russian Language in the Twentieth Century |edition=2nd |location=Wotton-under-Edge, England |publisher=Clarendon Press |year=1996 |isbn=978-0198240662 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/russianlanguagei00comr |pages=290–291 }}</ref> [[Orthography]] came to be viewed by many as an issue of [[politics]], and the letter yat its primary symbol. Émigré Russians generally adhered to the old spelling until after [[World War II]]; long and impassioned essays were written in its defense, as by [[Ivan Ilyin]] in 1952 ({{lang|ru|О русскомъ правописаніи}}, {{lang|ru-Latn|O russkom pravopisanii}}). Even in the [[Soviet Union]], it is said that some printing shops continued to use the eliminated letters until their blocks of type were forcibly removed; the Academy of Sciences published its annals in the old orthography until approximately 1924.{{Citation needed|date=August 2024}} The older spelling practice within Russia was ended through government pressure as well as by the large-scale [[Likbez|campaign for literacy]] in 1920s and 1930s, conducted in accordance with the new norm.<ref>[https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3507685 Грамматический террор: Как большевики свергли правила орфографии]</ref>

According to the reform, yat was replaced by {{angbr|е}} in most words, e.g. {{lang|ru|дѣти}}, {{lang|ru|совѣтъ}} became {{lang|ru|дети}}, {{lang|ru|совет}}; for a small number of words it was replaced by {{angbr|и}} instead, according to pronunciation: {{lang|ru|онѣ}} ('those', feminine), {{lang|ru|однѣ}} ('one', feminine plural), {{lang|ru|однѣхъ}}, {{lang|ru|однѣмъ}}, {{lang|ru|однѣми}} (declined forms of {{lang|ru|однѣ}} were replaced with {{lang|ru|они}}, {{lang|ru|одни}}, {{lang|ru|одних}}, {{lang|ru|одним}}, {{lang|ru|одними}}.

{{anchor|restoring_yat}}After the [[dissolution of the Soviet Union]], as a tendency occasionally to mimic the past appeared in [[Russia]], the old spelling became fashionable in some brand names and the like, as [[archaism]]s, specifically as "[[sensational spelling]]s". For example, the name of the business newspaper ''[[Kommersant]]'' appears on its masthead with a word-final [[hard sign]], which is superfluous in modern orthography: "{{lang|ru|Коммерсант'''ъ'''}}". Calls for the reintroduction of the old spelling were heard, though not taken seriously, as supporters of the yat described it as "that most Russian of letters", and the "white swan" ({{lang|ru|бѣлый лебедь}}) of Russian spelling.{{Citation needed|date=November 2008}}

===Ukrainian===
{{See also|Pankevychivka|Yaryzhka|Shashkevychivka}}
In [[Ukrainian language|Ukrainian]], yat has traditionally represented {{IPA|/i/}} or {{IPA|/ji/}}. In modern Ukrainian orthography its reflexes are represented by {{angbr|[[і]]}} or {{angbr|[[ї]]}}. As Ukrainian philologist Volodymyr Hlushchenko notes that initially in proto-Ukrainian tongues yat used to represent {{IPA|/ʲe/}} or {{IPA|/je/}} which around 13th century transitioned into {{IPA|/i/}}.<ref>Hlushchenko, V. ''[http://litopys.org.ua/ukrmova/um150.htm Yat (ЯТЬ)]''. Izbornyk.</ref> Yet, in some phonetic Ukrainian orthographies from the 19th century, it was used to represent both {{IPA|/ʲe/}} or {{IPA|/je/}} as well as {{IPA|/i/}}. This corresponds more with the Russian pronunciation of yat rather than actual word etymologies. Return to {{IPA|/ʲe/}} or {{IPA|/je/}} pronunciation was initiated by the Pavlovsky "Grammar of the Little Russian dialect" (1818) according to Hryhoriy Pivtorak.<ref>Pivtorak, H. ''[http://litopys.org.ua/ukrmova/um77.htm Orthography (ПРАВОПИС)]''. Izbornyk.</ref> While in the same "Grammar" Pavlovsky states that among Little Russians "yat" is pronounced as {{IPA|/i/}} (Ѣ произносится какъ Россїйское мягкое j. на пр: ні́жный, лі́то, слідъ, тінь, сі́но.).<ref>Alexey Pavlovsky ''[http://litopys.org.ua/rizne/slovpavl0.htm Grammar of the Little Russian dialect (ГРАММАТИКА МАЛОРОССІЙСКАГО НАРЂЧІЯ,)]''. Izbornyk.</ref> The modern Ukrainian letter {{angbr|[[є]]}} has the same phonetic function. Several Ukrainian orthographies with the different ways of using yat and without yat co-existed in the same time during the 19th century, and most of them were discarded before the 20th century. After the middle of the 19th century, orthographies without yat dominated in the Eastern part of Ukraine, and after the end of the 19th century they dominated in [[Galicia (Central Europe)|Galicia]]. However, in 1876–1905 the only Russian officially legalized orthography in the Eastern Ukraine was based on Russian phonetic system (with yat for {{IPA|/je/}}) and in the Western Ukraine (mostly in [[Carpathian Ruthenia]]) orthography with yat for {{IPA|/i/}} was used before 1945; in the rest of the western Ukraine (not subjected to the limitations made by the Russian Empire) the so-called "orthographic wars" ended up in receiving a uniformed phonetic system which replaced yat with either {{vr|[[ї]]}} or {{vr|[[і]]}} (it was used officially for Ukrainian language in the Austrian Empire).

'New yat' is a reflex of {{IPA|/e/}} (which merged with yat in Ukrainian) in closed syllables. New yat is not related to the Proto-Slavic yat, but it has frequently been represented by the same sign. Using yat instead of {{angbr|[[е]]}} in this position was a common after the 12th century. With the later phonological evolution of Ukrainian, both yat and new yat evolved into {{IPA|/i/}} or {{IPA|/ji/}}. Some other sounds also evolved to the sound {{IPA|/i/}} so that some Ukrainian texts from between the 17th and 19th centuries used the same letter ({{angbr|и}} or yat) uniformly rather than variation between yat, new yat, {{angbr|[[и]]}}, and reflex of {{angbr|[[о]]}} in closed syllables, but using yat to unify all i-sounded vowels was less common, and so 'new yat' usually means letter yat in the place of i-sounded {{angbr|[[е]]}} only. In some etymology-based orthography systems of the 19th century, yat was represented by {{angbr|ѣ}} and new yat was replaced with {{angbr|ê}} ({{angbr|e}} with circumflex). At this same time, the Ukrainian writing system replaced yat and new yat by {{angbr|і}} or {{angbr|ї}}.

===Rusyn===
In [[Rusyn language|Rusyn]], yat was used until 1945. In modern times, some Rusyn writers and poets try to reinstate it, but this initiative is not really popular among Rusyn [[intelligentsia]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=2013 |title=Rusyn Romanization Table, 2013 version |url=https://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/romanization/rusyn.pdf |website=[[Library of Congress]]}}</ref>

===Romanian===
In the old [[Romanian Cyrillic alphabet]], the yat, called {{lang|ro|eati}}, was used as the {{IPA|/e̯a/}} diphthong. It disappeared when Romanian adopted the transitional alphabet, first in [[Wallachia]], then in [[Moldavia]].

===Serbo-Croatian===
[[Image:Balkan dialects belic 1914.jpg|thumb|Nationalist take on the border between Serbian and Bulgarian that classifies all ekavian Bulgarian dialects as Serbian. By [[Aleksandar Belić]] (1914)]]
[[File:Boundary between Croatian and Serbian according to Matasic (1985).jpg|thumb|Nationalist take on the border between Croatian and Serbian that classifies all ijekavian Serbian dialects as Croatian. By Tomo Matasic (1985)]]
The Old Serbo-Croatian ''yat'' phoneme is assumed to have a phonetic value articulatory between the vowels {{IPA|/i/}} and {{IPA|/e/}}. In the [[Štokavian]] and [[Čakavian]] vowel systems, this phoneme lost a back vowel parallel; the tendency towards articulatory symmetry led to its merging with other phonemes.{{Citation needed|date=November 2008}}

On the other hand, most [[Kajkavian]] dialects did have a back vowel parallel (a reflex of *ǫ and *l̥), and both the front and back vowels were retained in most of these dialects' vowel system before merging with a reflex of a vocalized [[Yer]] (*ь). Thus the Kajkavian vowel system has a symmetry between front and back closed vocalic phonemes: */ẹ/ (< */ě/, */ь/) and */ọ/ (< */ǫ/, */l̥/).

Čakavian dialects utilized both possibilities of establishing symmetry of vowels by developing Ikavian and Ekavian reflexes, as well as "guarding the old yat" at northern borders (Buzet dialect). According to yat reflex Čakavian dialects are divided to Ikavian (mostly South Čakavian), Ekavian (North Čakavian) and mixed Ikavian-Ekavian (Middle Čakavian), in which mixed Ikavian-Ekavian reflex is conditioned by following phonemes according to [[Jakubinskij's law]] (e.g. {{lang|ckm|sled}} : {{lang|ckm|sliditi}} < [[Proto-Slavic|PSl.]] *slědъ : *slěditi; {{lang|ckm|del}} : {{lang|ckm|diliti}} < *dělъ : *děliti). Mixed Ikavian-Ekavian Čakavian dialects have been heavily influenced by [[Analogy#Linguistics|analogy]] (influence of nominative form on [[oblique case]]s, infinitive on other verbal forms, word stem onto derivations etc.). The only exception among Čakavian dialects is [[Lastovo]] island and the village of [[Janjina]], with Jekavian reflex of yat.

The most complex development of yat has occurred in Štokavian, namely Ijekavian Štokavian dialects which are used as a dialectal basis for modern standard Serbo-Croatian variants, and that makes the reflexes of yat one of the central issues of Serbo-Croatian orthoepy and orthography. In most Croatian Štokavian dialects yat has yielded diphthongal sequence of {{IPA|/ie̯/}} in long and short syllables. The position of this diphthong is equally unstable as that of closed *{{IPA|/ẹ/}}, which has led to its dephonologization. Short diphthong has thus turned to diphonemic sequence {{IPA|/je/}}, and long to disyllabic (triphonemic) {{IPA|/ije/}}, but that outcome is not the only one in Štokavian dialects, so the pronunciation of long yat in Neo-Štokavian dialects can be both monosyllabic (diphthongal or triphthongal) and disyllabic (triphonemic). However, that process has been completed in dialects which serve as a dialectal basis for the orthographical codification of Ijekavian Serbo-Croatian. In writing, the diphthong {{IPA|/ie̯/}} is represented by the trigraph {{angbr|ije}} – this particular inconsistency being a remnant of the late 19th century codification efforts, which planned to redesign common standard language for Croats and Serbs. This culminated in the [[Novi Sad agreement]] and "common" orthography and dictionary. Digraphic spelling of a diphthong as e.g. was used by some 19th-century Croat writers who promoted so-called "etymological orthography" – in fact [[orthography#Morpho-phonemic orthography|morpho-phonemic orthography]] which was advocated by some Croatian philological schools of the time ([[Zagreb philological school]]), and which was even official during the brief period of the fascist [[Independent State of Croatia]] (1941–1945). In standard Croatian, although standard orthography is {{angbr|ije}} for long yat, standard pronunciation is {{IPA|/jeː/}}. Serbian has two standards: Ijekavian is {{IPA|/ije/}} for long yat and Ekavian which uses {{IPA|/e/}} for short and {{IPA|/eː/}} for long yat.

Standard Bosnian and Montenegrin use {{IPA|/je/}} for short and {{IPA|/ije/}} for long yat.

Dephonologization of diphthongal yat reflex could also be caused by [[Assimilation (linguistics)|assimilation]] within diphthong {{IPA|/ie̯/}} itself: if the first part of a diphthong assimilates secondary part, so-called ''secondary Ikavian reflex'' develops; and if the second part of a diphthong assimilates the first part ''secondary Ekavian reflex'' develops. Most Štokavian Ikavian dialects of Serbo-Croatian are exactly such – secondary Ikavian dialects, and from Ekavian dialects secondary are the Štokavian Ekavian dialects of Slavonian [[Podravina]] and most of Serbia. They have a common origin with Ijekavian Štokavian dialects in a sense of developing yat reflex as diphthongal reflex. Some dialects also "guard" older yat sound, and some reflexes are probably direct from yat.

Direct Ikavian, Ekavian and mixed reflexes of yat in Čakavian dialects are a much older phenomenon, which has some traces in written monuments and is estimated to have been completed in the 13th century. The practice of using old yat phoneme in [[Glagolitic]] and [[Bosnian Cyrillic]] writings in which Serbo-Croatian was written in the centuries that followed was a consequence of conservative scribe tradition. Croatian linguists also speak of two Štokavians, Western Štokavian (also called Šćakavian) which retained yat longer, and Eastern Štokavian which "lost" yat sooner, probably under (western) Bulgarian influences.
Areas which bordered Kajkavian dialects mostly retained yat, areas which bordered Čakavian dialects mostly had secondary Ikavisation, and areas which bordered (western) Bulgarian dialects mostly had secondary Ekavisation. "Core" areas remained Ijekavian, although western part of the "core" became monosyllabic for old long yat.

Reflexes of yat in Ijekavian dialects are from the very start dependent on syllable quantity. As it has already been said, standard Ijekavian Serbo-Croatian writes trigraph {{angbr|ije}} at the place of old long yat, which is in standard pronunciation manifested disyllabically (within Croatian standard monosyllabic pronunciation), and writes {{angbr|je}} at the place of short yat. E.g. {{lang|sh|bijȇl}} < [[Proto-Slavic|PSl.]] *bělъ, {{lang|sh|mlijéko}} < *mlěko < by [[liquid metathesis]] from *melkò, {{lang|sh|brijȇg}} < *brěgъ < by [[liquid metathesis]] from *bȇrgъ, but {{lang|sh|mjȅsto}} < *mě̀sto, {{lang|sh|vjȅra}} < *vě̀ra, {{lang|sh|mjȅra}} < *mě̀ra. There are however some limitations; in front of {{IPA|/j/}} and {{IPA|/o/}} (< word-final {{IPA|/l/}}) yat has a reflex of short {{IPA|/i/}}. In scenarios when {{IPA|/l/}} is not substituted by {{IPA|/o/}}, i.e. not word-finally (which is a common Štokavian isogloss), yat reflex is also different. E.g. {{lang|sh|grijati}} < *grějati, {{lang|sh|sijati}} < *sějati, {{lang|sh|bijaše}} < *bějaše; but {{lang|sh|htio}} : {{lang|sh|htjela}} < *htělъ : *htěla, {{lang|sh|letio}} : {{lang|sh|letjela}} (< *letělъ : *letěla). The standard language also allows some doublets to coexist, e.g. {{lang|sh|cȉo}} and {{lang|sh|cijȇl}} < *cě̑lъ, {{lang|sh|bȉo}} and {{lang|sh|bijȇl}} < *bě́lъ.

Short yat has reflexes of {{IPA|/e/}} and {{IPA|/je/}} behind {{IPA|/r/}} in consonant clusters, e.g. {{lang|sh|brȅgovi}} and {{lang|sh|brjȅgovi}}, {{lang|sh|grehòta}} and {{lang|sh|grjehòta}}, {{lang|sh|strèlica}} and {{lang|sh|strjèlica}}, etc.

If short syllable with yat in the word stem lengthens due to the phonetic or morphological conditions, reflex of {{IPA|/je/}} is preserved, e.g. {{lang|sh|djȅlo}} – {{lang|sh|djȇlā}}, {{lang|sh|nèdjelja}} – {{lang|sh|nȅdjēljā}}.

In modern standard Ijekavian Serbo-Croatian varieties syllables that carry yat reflexes are recognized by [[apophony|alternations]] in various inflected forms of the same word or in different words derived from the same stem. These alternating sequences {{vr|{{wrap|ije/je, ije/e, ije/i, ije/Ø, ije/i, je/ije, e/ije, e/je, i/ije}}}} are dependent on syllable quantity. Beside modern reflexes they also encompass apophonic alternations inherited from [[Proto-Slavic]] and [[Indo-European ablaut|Indo-European]] times, which were also conditioned by quantitative alternations of root syllable, e.g. {{lang|sh|ùmrijēti}} – {{lang|sh|ȕmrēm}}, {{lang|sh|lȉti}} – {{lang|sh|lijévati}} etc. These alternations also show the difference between the diphthongal syllables with Ijekavian reflex of yat and syllables with primary phonemic sequence of {{vr|ije}}, which has nothing to do with yat and which never shows alternation in inflected forms, e.g. {{lang|sh|zmìje, nijèdan, òrijent}}, etc.

{{anchor|Code positions}}

==Computing codes==

{{charmap
|0462|name1=Cyrillic Capital Letter Yat
|0463|name2=Cyrillic Small Letter Yat
|1C87|name3=Cyrillic Small Letter Tall Yat
|A652|name4=Cyrillic Capital Letter Iotified Yat
|A653|name5=Cyrillic Small Letter Iotified Yat
}}

==See also==
* Ѧ ѧ : [[Yus]]
* Ҍ ҍ : [[Semisoft sign|Cyrillic letter Semisoft sign]]
* Ә ә : [[Schwa (Cyrillic)|Cyrillic schwa]], used in Turkic languages and Kalmyk to transcribe the [[near-open front unrounded vowel]] (/æ/)
* Ӓ ӓ : [[A with diaeresis (Cyrillic)|Cyrillic letter A with diaeresis]], used in Mari to transcribe the [[near-open front unrounded vowel]] (/æ/)
* Ě ě : [[Ě|Latin letter E with caron]] - a Czech and Sorbian letter

==References==
{{Reflist}}

==Sources==
* {{cite book |script-title=bg:Български диалектален атлас |trans-title=Atlas of Bulgarian Dialects|volume=I-III Phonetics. Accentology. Lexicology|publisher=Trud Publishing House|location=София |language=bg |isbn=954-90344-1-0 |year=2001|url=https://ibl.bas.bg/lib/bda/#page/1/mode/1up | ref = {{SfnRef|Atlas of Bulgarian Dialects|2001}} }}
* {{cite book|script-title=bg:Българска диалектология|trans-title=Bulgarian Dialectology|year=1993|publisher=Prof. Marin Drinov|edition=III|language=bg|last=Stoykov|first=Stoyko|url=http://www.promacedonia.org/jchorb/st/index.htm}}
* {{cite book |last=Duridanov|first=Ivan |script-title=bg:Граматика на старобългарския език|trans-title= Grammar of Old Bulgarian |language=bg|year=1991|publisher=Bulgarian Language Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences|location=Sofia |url=https://macedonia.kroraina.com/id_gram/index.htm|isbn=954-430-159-3}}
* {{cite book |last= Mirchev|first= Kiril|script-title=bg:Историческа граматика на българския език |trans-title=Historical Grammar of the Bulgarian Language|publisher=Наука и изкуство |year= 1978|language=bg|location=Sofia|edition=III}}
* {{cite book|script-title=bg:Из българската историческа фонетика|trans-title=On Bulgarian Historical Phonetics|last=Totomanova|first=Anna-Maria|year=2014|language=bg|publisher=St. Clement of Ohrid University Publisher|location=Sofia|isbn=9789540737881}}

==Further reading==
* {{cite book |last= Barić |first= Eugenija |author2=Mijo Lončarić |author3=Dragica Malić |author4=Slavko Pavešić |author5=Mirko Peti |author6=Vesna Zečević |author7=Marija Znika
|title=Hrvatska gramatika |publisher=[[Školska knjiga]] |year= 1997 |isbn= 953-0-40010-1 }}

{{Cyrillic navbox}}

[[Category:History of the Bulgarian language]]
[[Category:Cyrillic letters]]