View source for List of future Interstate Highways

{{Short description|none}}
{{Use American English|date=April 2025}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=February 2025}}
{{infobox state highway system
|header_type = UC
|title = Dwight D. Eisenhower National System of Interstate and Defense Highways
|shields = {{infobox road/shieldmain/USA|type=Future|route=3}} {{infobox road/shieldmain/USA|type=Future|route=42}}
|caption = Shields for future Interstates
|map = Future Interstate Highways.jpg
|map_alt = 
|map_notes = Proposed Interstate Highways in December 2015
|formed= June 29, 1956<ref name=FAHA56>{{cite journal |last = Weingroff |first = Richard F. |title = Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956, Creating the Interstate System |url = https://highways.dot.gov/public-roads/summer-1996/federal-aid-highway-act-1956-creating-interstate-system |journal = Public Roads |location = Washington, DC |publisher = [[Federal Highway Administration]] |volume = 60 |issue = 1 |date = Summer 1996 |access-date = March 16, 2012 }}</ref>
|length_mi = 
|length_ref= 
|interstate= Interstate X (I-X)
|links = I
}}

In the United States, '''future Interstate Highways''' include proposals to establish new mainline (one- and two-digit) routes to the [[Interstate Highway System]]. Included in this article are [[List of auxiliary Interstate Highways|auxiliary Interstate Highways]] (designated by three-digit numbers) in varying stages of planning and construction, and the planned expansion of existing primary Interstate Highways.

==Congressionally designated future Interstates==
Several [[Congressional High Priority Corridor]]s have been designated as future parts of the Interstate Highway System by the [[Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act]] and amendments. By law, they will become interstates when built to [[Interstate standards]] and connected to other interstates.<ref>{{cite web |url = http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d104:s.00440: |title = National Highway System Designation Act of 1995 |author = United States Congress |publisher = Library of Congress |access-date = October 21, 2007 |archive-date = September 4, 2015 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150904093813/http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d104:s.00440: |url-status = dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |publisher = Federal Highway Administration |url = http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/hep10/nhs/hipricorridors/hpcfitext.htm |title = Future Interstates on the National Highway System Designated by Section 1105 of ISTEA as amended |author = Staff |date = May 2, 2006 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20060926224910/http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/hep10/nhs/hipricorridors/hpcfitext.htm |archive-date = September 26, 2006 }}</ref>

===Interstate 3===
{{main|Interstate 3}}
{{infobox road small
|header_type=UC
|country=USA
|type=Future
|route=3
|location=[[Savannah, Georgia|Savannah, GA]]&nbsp;– [[Knoxville, Tennessee|Knoxville, TN]]
}}

Interstate 3 is the proposed designation of an Interstate Highway Corridor under development in the [[Southeastern United States]]. It is planned to run from [[Savannah, Georgia]], to [[Knoxville, Tennessee]]. Its number does not follow standard numbering conventions; under established numbering conventions, I-3 would normally run west of I-5 along the [[West Coast of the United States|Pacific Coast]]. The unnumbered Interstate was established by the [[Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users]] (SAFETEA-LU) legislation that also provided for [[Interstate 14]]. The "Interstate 3" designation has not been officially accepted by [[American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials]] (AASHTO) or the [[Federal Highway Administration]] (FHWA), but is being used by the [[Georgia Department of Transportation]] and others to identify the highway. The number comes from the [[3rd Infantry Division (United States)|3rd Infantry Division]], which is based in Georgia. The exact route has not been finalized.<ref>{{Cite web |date = December 21, 2024 |title = Table of Contents - Report To Congress - 3rd Infantry Highway - Section 1927 - Planning - FHWA |url = https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/section_1927/3rd_infantry_highway/report_to_congress/report00.cfm |access-date = January 24, 2025 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20241221180614/https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/section_1927/3rd_infantry_highway/report_to_congress/report00.cfm |archive-date = December 21, 2024 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date = February 6, 2024 |title = Appendix A: Preliminary Corridors - Design Levels - 3rd Infantry Highway - Section 1927 - Planning - FHWA |url = https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/section_1927/3rd_infantry_highway/design_levels/dl09.cfm |access-date = January 24, 2025 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20240206184428/https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/section_1927/3rd_infantry_highway/design_levels/dl09.cfm |archive-date = February 6, 2024 }}</ref>

===Interstate 7 or 9===
{{main|California State Route 99}}
{{Infobox road small
|header_type=UC
|country=USA
|type=Future
|route=7
|name=Future Interstate 7 or 9
|location=[[Wheeler Ridge, California|Wheeler Ridge]]–[[Sacramento, California|Sacramento, CA]]
}}

Interstate&nbsp;7 or 9 has been proposed by [[Caltrans]] for [[California State Route 99|State Route 99]] in central [[California]]. It would go from the split with [[Interstate 5 in California|I-5]] at [[Wheeler Ridge, California|Wheeler Ridge]] ([[Wheeler Ridge Interchange]]) north through [[Bakersfield, California|Bakersfield]] and [[Fresno, California|Fresno]] to [[Stockton, California|Stockton]], where the proposed route(s) turns west via the [[California State Route 4|SR&nbsp;4]] freeway to a terminus at I-5 in the central part of that city. An alternate proposed terminus is located at the I-5/[[U.S. Route 50 in California|US&nbsp;50]]/[[Capital City Freeway]] junction in [[Sacramento, California|Sacramento]], where the future Interstate(s), after continuing north from Stockton along Route 99, can turn west along the [[Interstate 80 Business (Sacramento, California)|Capital City Freeway]], already an Interstate route (unsigned I-305), to connect with I-5, which extends north toward [[Redding, California|Redding]]. This also serves as a connector to the existing northern portion of Highway 99. The future Interstate's prospects for development to appropriate standards are tied to the Caltrans "Route 99 Corridor Enhancement Master Plan"; this document posits that when and if Interstate status is conferred, the route will be designated I-7 or I-9.<ref>{{cite book |url= http://www.dot.ca.gov/dist6/99masterplan/index.html |title= Caltrans Route 99 Enhancement Plan |format= PDF |chapter-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090714144558/http://www.dot.ca.gov/dist6/99masterplan/docs/chapter3.pdf |chapter=Chapter 3 |publisher= California Department of Transportation |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100204092521/https://dot.ca.gov/dist6/99masterplan/index.html |archive-date=February 4, 2010 |quote= Interstate designation, under the current proposal, would apply to the {{convert|260|mi|km|adj=on}} segment between the junction of State Route 99 with I-5 south of [[Bakersfield, California|Bakersfield]] to I-5 in Stockton using State Route 4 as the connector to I-5. Since there is an I-99 route currently in existence in Pennsylvania, it is anticipated that should designation be granted, the Route 99 designation would become I-7 or 9 to satisfy Interstate numbering convention.}}</ref> The route is to remain roughly [[parallel (geometry)|parallel]] to I-5, serving major cities in California I-5 does not, including Fresno and Bakersfield.

In August 2005, with the passage of that year's SAFETEA-LU federal transportation legislation, SR 99 from Wheeler Ridge to Stockton and beyond to Sacramento was designated as [[High Priority Corridor]]&nbsp;54, the California Farm-to-Market Corridor; this legislation also designated that corridor as a future segment of the Interstate System.<ref name="SAFETEA-LU">{{cite web |url = http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_cong_bills&docid=f:h3enr.txt |title = Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users |author = United States Congress |publisher = Library of Congress }}</ref>
{{Clear}}

===Interstate 42 (Oklahoma–Arkansas)===
{{main|U.S. Route 412 in Oklahoma}}
{{infobox road small
|header_type=UC
|state=OK
|type=Future
|route=42
|formed=
|location= [[Noble County, Oklahoma|Noble County, OK]] to [[Springdale, Arkansas|Springdale, AR]]
|length_mi= 190
}}

On May 20, 2021, Senator [[Jim Inhofe]], of Oklahoma, introduced legislation to designate the portion of US&nbsp;412 between I-35 in Noble County and [[Interstate 49 in Arkansas|I-49]] in [[Springdale, Arkansas]] as future Interstate 42 (I-42).<ref>{{cite news |title = Residents get clarity on plans for U.S. 412 |url = https://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2024/jun/14/residents-get-clarity-on-highway-plans/ |access-date = June 27, 2024 |work = Arkansas Democrat Gazette |date = June 14, 2024 |language = en }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title = Siloam Springs residents speak out about interstate proposal |url = https://www.4029tv.com/article/siloam-springs-residents-speak-out-about-interstate-proposal/61103469 |access-date = June 27, 2024 |work = 40/29 News Sunrise |date = June 13, 2024 |language = en }}</ref> The bill, titled the "Future Interstate in Oklahoma and Arkansas Act" ({{USBill|117|S|1766}}), was cosponsored by senators [[John Boozman]] and [[Tom Cotton]], both of Arkansas. The senators' stated reasons for seeking an Interstate designation along US&nbsp;412 included encouraging economic development, expanding opportunities for employment in the region, making travel safer and shipping easier, attracting new businesses, and better connecting rural and urban communities. Other supporters of the measure include Mayor [[G. T. Bynum]] of Tulsa, and the heads of both ODOT and the [[Arkansas Department of Transportation]] (ArDOT).<ref name="tbp">{{cite news |last = Della Rosa |first = Jeff |title = U.S. legislators look to designate part of Highway 412 as 'future interstate' |url = https://talkbusiness.net/2021/05/u-s-legislators-look-to-designate-part-of-highway-412-as-future-interstate/ |publisher = Talk Business & Politics |date = May 21, 2021 |access-date = May 22, 2021 }}</ref> The language of the bill was later included in the [[Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act]] ({{USBill|117|HR|3684}}). Interstate 42 (I-42) was the proposed designation but was withdrawn.<ref>{{Cite web |title = Final_Report_USRN_Fall_2023_R_1.pdf |url = https://transportation.org/route/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2023/12/Final_Report_USRN_Fall_2023_R_1.pdf |access-date = July 4, 2024 }}</ref> ArDOT and ODOT later resubmitted the application to the Spring 2024 meeting; AASHTO approved the route as Interstate 42, conditional on it being upgraded to [[Interstate standards]].<ref>{{AASHTO minutes |year=2024S |access-date=June 2, 2024 |link=yes}}</ref>
{{clear}}

===Interstate 67===
{{redirect|I-67|the Japanese submarine|Japanese submarine I-67}}
{{infobox road small
|header_type=UC
|country=USA
|type=Future
|route=67
|location={{plainlist|
*[[Indianapolis|Indianapolis, IN]]–[[Grand Rapids, Michigan|Grand Rapids, MI]];
*[[Elkhart, Indiana|Elkhart, IN]]–[[Kalamazoo, Michigan|Kalamazoo, MI]];
*[[Bowling Green, Kentucky|Bowling Green]]–[[Owensboro, Kentucky|Owensboro, KY]]–[[Crane, Indiana|Crane, IN]]
}}
}}
{{main|U.S. Route 31 in Indiana}}

Interstate 67 has been a proposed number for at least three highways.

I-67 was originally the designation given to a never-built highway connecting [[Kalamazoo, Michigan]], to the east side of [[Elkhart, Indiana]], as part of the original Interstate numbering plan in 1957.<ref>{{cite map |url = http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Interstate_Highway_plan_August_14,_1957.jpg |title = Official Route Numbering for the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways |publisher = [[American Association of State Highway Officials]] |author = Public Roads Administration |date = August 14, 1957 |via = [[Wikimedia Commons]] }}</ref> A planning map shows a freeway along this routing intersecting the [[Indiana Toll Road]] just west of the [[Indiana State Road 19|State Road 19]] interchange.<ref>{{cite web |url = http://indianainterstates.homestead.com/fai9_57.html |title = FAI9 1957 |access-date = May 7, 2008 |work = Indiana Interstates: 1957 Interstate Highway System |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20020623103340/http://indianainterstates.homestead.com/fai9_57.html |archive-date = June 23, 2002 }}</ref> The [[Michigan State Highway Department]] officially requested switching the I-67 designation to a route from Benton Harbor to Grand Rapids in 1958, and in the process proposed the northerly extension of the original I-69 from the I-80/I-90/Indiana Toll Road to Lansing.<ref name=RINRM58>{{cite report |author = Staff |url = http://nwindianahwys.homestead.com/michiplan.html |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20040805182658/http://nwindianahwys.homestead.com/michiplan.html |archive-date = August 5, 2004 |access-date = September 4, 2010 |title = Recommended Interstate Route Numbering for Michigan |date = April 25, 1958 |publisher = [[Michigan State Highway Department]] }}</ref> The I-67 designation was denied by the [[American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials]] which then assigned I-196 to the Benton Harbor to Grand Rapids route, west of the [[Interstate 96|I-96]] junction near [[Grand Rapids, Michigan|Grand Rapids]].<ref>{{cite news |title = Would Shift Route Number: Mackie Seeks Int.&nbsp;96 Designation for Grand Rapids–Muskegon Stretch |work = [[The Grand Rapids Press]] |page = 31 |oclc = 9975013 |date = May 1, 1963 }}</ref>

[[Indiana]] has proposed using the I-67 designation for the freeway upgrade of [[U.S. Route 31 in Indiana|US&nbsp;31]] currently under construction between [[Indianapolis]] and [[South Bend, Indiana|South Bend]], possibly continuing northward via the US&nbsp;31 freeway to [[Benton Harbor, Michigan]], and going northward from there along existing [[Interstate 196|I-196]] to [[Grand Rapids, Michigan|Grand Rapids]]. The Indiana Senate unanimously passed a resolution calling for federal funding for this proposal and the I-67 designation in 2003.<ref>{{cite press release |url = https://www.in.gov/s11/3-25-03.htm |title = Zakas' Resolution Passes Senate Unanimously; Bill supports efforts of Indiana Congressional Delegation to seek federal funding for US&nbsp;31 freeway project |access-date = July 6, 2009 |publisher = State of [[Indiana Senate]] District 11 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070311070640/http://www.in.gov/s11/3-25-03.htm |archive-date = March 11, 2007 }}</ref> Meanwhile, Indiana expedited the upgrading of three major sections on US&nbsp;31 between Indianapolis and South Bend including the Kokomo Bypass. This was done using funds received through the 2006 Major Moves deal. Such a proposal would put I-67 in the proper place in the grid (it is the only number available for that route).

A third, much shorter, proposal in 2011 by the I-67 Development Corporation from the [[Owensboro, Kentucky]], area involves continuing the proposed I-67 in Indiana along a route parallel to [[U.S. Route 231|US&nbsp;231]] from [[Crane, Indiana]], to [[Bowling Green, Kentucky]]. Much of the proposed route already exists and is close to Interstate grade. Only the northern third from [[Dale, Indiana]], to Crane remains unfinished. It would use the [[Natcher Bridge]] to cross the [[Ohio River]], Kentucky's [[Interstate 165 (Kentucky)|I-165]] and Indiana's Lincoln Parkway, an expressway facility that would need to be fully upgraded to Interstate standards. It would go around the cities of [[Jasper, Indiana|Jasper]] and [[Huntingburg, Indiana|Huntingburg]] in Indiana as well as Owensboro, [[Hartford, Kentucky|Hartford]], and [[Morgantown, Kentucky]], and end at Bowling Green. It could also be linked to the first proposal by overlapping I-67 with the currently under construction I-69 from Indianapolis to Crane.<ref>{{cite web |author = GO-EDC |date = January 13, 2012 |title = Facts about Interstate 67 as Owensboro's interstate |url = http://owensboroedc.blogspot.com/2012/01/facts-about-interstate-67-as-owensboros.html |work = Owensboro Economic Development Blog |publisher = Greater Owensboro Economic Development Corporation |access-date = October 10, 2012 }}</ref>
{{clear}}

== Future Auxiliary Interstate Highways ==
=== Interstate 169 (Tennessee) ===
{{main|Tennessee State Route 22}}
{{infobox road small
|header_type=UC
|state=TN
|type=Future
|route=169
|formed=
|location=[[Union City, Tennessee|Union City]] to [[Martin, Tennessee|Martin]]
|length_mi=15.00
}}

Interstate 169 is proposed to run along Tennessee State Route 22 from [[Union City, Tennessee|Union City]] to [[Martin, Tennessee|Martin]].<ref>{{Cite web |title = Tennessee General Assembly |url = https://capitol.tn.gov//Bills/102/Bill/SJR0512 |access-date = January 23, 2025 |website = capitol.tn.gov }}</ref>
{{-}}

=== Interstate 195 (Washington D.C.) ===
{{main|Interstate 395 (Virginia–District of Columbia)}}
{{infobox road small
|header_type=UC
|state=DC
|type=Future
|marker_image=none
|route=195
|length_mi=2.41
|formed=
|location=[[Washington, District of Columbia|Washington]]
}}

The current [[Interstate 695 (District of Columbia)|Interstate 695]] will be eliminated and be replaced with an extension of [[Interstate 395 (Virginia–District of Columbia)|Interstate 395]]. The original Interstate 395 through the 3rd Street Tunnel will be renumbered as Interstate 195.<ref>{{Cite web |date = January 11, 2021 |title = Move over, I-395: Southeast Freeway, 3rd Street Tunnel to be renumbered |url = https://wtop.com/dc-transit/2021/01/move-over-i-395-southeast-freeway-3rd-street-tunnel-to-be-renumbered/ |access-date = February 11, 2025 |website = WTOP News |language = en }}</ref>
{{-}}

=== Interstate 214 ===
{{main|Interstate 14#Auxiliary route}}
{{infobox road small
|header_type=UC
|state=TX
|type=Future
|route=214
|marker_image=[[File:I-214 (Future).png|50px|I-214 (Future)]]
|formed=
|location=[[Bryan–College Station]]
}}

Interstate 214 is proposed to be a beltway around Bryan-College Station in Texas.<ref>{{Cite web |title = Statutory Listing of Corridor Descriptions - High Priority Corridors - National Highway System - Planning - FHWA |url = https://fhwa.dot.gov/planning/national_highway_system/high_priority_corridors/hpcor.cfm |archive-url = http://web.archive.org/web/20241230113301/https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/national_highway_system/high_priority_corridors/hpcor.cfm |archive-date = December 30, 2024 |access-date = January 23, 2025 |website = fhwa.dot.gov |language = en }}</ref>
{{-}}

=== Interstate 222 ===
{{main|Interstate 22#Interstate 222}}
{{infobox road small
|header_type=UC
|state=AL
|type=Future
|route=222
|formed=
|location=[[Graysville, Alabama|Graysville]] to [[Brookside, Alabama|Brookside]]
|length_mi=2.26
}}

Interstate 222 is a future [[auxiliary Interstate Highway]] that will be a [[Connector (road)|connector]] between I-22 and the proposed [[Interstate 422|I-422]] near [[Birmingham, Alabama]]. There will be no exits other than its termini. The highway has been proposed because an [[Interchange (road)|interchange]] directly between I-22 and I-422 cannot be built due to environmental issues.<ref>{{AASHTO minutes |year = 2012S |access-date=January 24, 2025 }}</ref>
{{-}}

=== Interstate 274 (North Carolina) ===
{{main|Winston-Salem Northern Beltway}}
{{infobox road small
|header_type=UC
|state=NC
|type=Future
|route=274
|formed=
|location=[[Winston-Salem, North Carolina|Winston-Salem]]
|length_mi=16.83
}}

Interstate 274 is the future designation for the western half of the beltway, currently designated as NC 452. When completed, it will connect [[U.S. Route 158|US 158]], near [[Clemmons, North Carolina]], to [[Interstate 74 in North Carolina|Future I-74]]/[[Interstate 285 (North Carolina)|Future I-285]]/[[U.S. Route 52 in North Carolina|US 52]], in [[Bethania, North Carolina|Bethania]]. I-274 first appeared on [[North Carolina Department of Transportation]] (NCDOT) planning maps in the early 2000s but was later disused for over a decade since. On May 20, 2019, the [[American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials]] (AASHTO) approved a request to establish Future I-274. Justification given by NCDOT was that the {{Convert|16.83|mi|km|adj=on}} section would satisfy a great need to alleviate congestion in Winston-Salem and connect the western portion of the urbanized area.<ref>{{Cite web |date = October 29, 2011 |title = NCDOT: Project Details |url = http://www.ncdot.gov/projects/search/details.html#id=1644 |access-date = January 23, 2025 }}</ref>
{{-}}

=== Interstate 310 (Mississippi) ===
{{main|Interstate 310 (Mississippi)}}
{{infobox road small
|header_type=UC
|state=MS
|type=Future
|route=310
|formed=
|location=[[Gulfport, Mississippi|Gulfport]]
|length_mi=6.00
}}

Interstate 310 is a proposed Interstate in Mississippi. Construction was supposed to begin in 2008 but never occurred. Much of the land clearing was done.<ref>{{Cite web |title = Statutory Listing of Corridor Descriptions |department =  Planning |url = https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/national_highway_system/high_priority_corridors/hpcor.cfm |access-date = January 24, 2025 |publisher = Federal Highway Administration }}</ref>
{{-}}

=== Interstate 365 ===
{{main|Cumberland Parkway}}
{{infobox road small
|header_type=UC
|state=KY
|type=Future
|route=365
|formed=
|location=[[Park City, Kentucky|Park City]] to [[Somerset, Kentucky|Somerset]]
|length_mi=88.376
}}

Interstate 365 is a proposed redesignation of the [[Cumberland Parkway]] once it is upgraded to Interstate standards. On August 5, 2021, Congress released a new infrastructure bill that proposed to designate the whole length of the Cumberland Expressway as a Future Interstate, with the designation of I-365.<ref>{{cite news |date=August 2, 2021 |title=Bipartisan infrastructure bill |department = CNN Politics |url=https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/01/politics/read-bipartisan-infrastructure-bill-text/index.html |access-date=January 24, 2025 |publisher=CNN |language=en}}</ref> The designation would need approval from AASHTO, the FHWA, and upgrades of several interchanges and other improvements before the designation could be implemented.
{{-}}

=== Interstate 369 (Kentucky) ===
{{main|Audubon Parkway}}
{{infobox road small
|header_type=UC
|state=KY
|type=Future
|route=369
|formed=
|location=[[Henderson, Kentucky|Henderson]] to [[Owensboro, Kentucky|Owensboro]]
|length_mi=24.441
}}

Interstate 369 is planned to follow the entire Audubon Parkway with the Western terminus to Interstate 69 being called Interstate 69 Spur.<ref>{{Cite web |date=April 4, 2019 |title=Congressman Comer and Senator McConnell Introduce Legislation to Designate I-69 Spur in Muhlenberg and Ohio Counties {{!}} Congressman James Comer |url=https://comer.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-comer-and-senator-mcconnell-introduce-legislation-designate-i-69 |access-date=January 24, 2025 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190404170016/https://comer.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-comer-and-senator-mcconnell-introduce-legislation-designate-i-69 |archive-date=April 4, 2019 }}</ref>
{{-}}

=== Interstate 380 (Ohio) ===
{{main|Ohio State Route 8}}
{{infobox road small
|header_type=UC
|state=OH
|type=Future
|route=380
|marker_image=none
|formed=
|location=[[Akron, Ohio|Akron]] to [[Macedonia, Ohio|Macedonia]]
|length_mi=17.57
}}

Interstate 380 is proposed to start from the southern terminus of Ohio SR 8 at Akron to the intersection of I-271. The project has not been approved yet.<ref>{{Cite web |last = Schleis |first = Paula |title = Planning agency AMATS says it's time for state Route 8 to be designated as interstate |url = http://ohio.com/news/local/planning-agency-amats-says-it-s-time-for-state-route-8-to-be-designated-as-interstate-1.458896 |archive-url = http://web.archive.org/web/20160122011316/http://www.ohio.com/news/local/planning-agency-amats-says-it-s-time-for-state-route-8-to-be-designated-as-interstate-1.458896 |archive-date = January 22, 2016 |access-date = January 24, 2025 |website = www.ohio.com }}</ref>
{{-}}

=== Interstate 422 ===
{{main|Birmingham Northern Beltline}}
{{infobox road small
|header_type=UC
|state=AL
|type=Future
|route=422
|formed=
|location=south of [[Bessemer, Alabama|Bessemer]] to [[Argo, Alabama|Argo]]
|length_mi=52.5
}}

Interstate 422 is a proposed beltway in [[Birmingham, Alabama|Birmingham]]. Interstate 422 will not directly connect to I-22 so therefore a new connector known as Interstate 222 is proposed. It is also called Corridor X-1. A timeline for construction to begin has not been established.<ref>{{Cite web |last = Blakely |date = August 24, 2023 |first = Will |title = U.S. Rep. Palmer: Northern Beltline 'critical' for Alabama; Says I-65… |url = https://1819news.com/news/item/u-s-rep-palmer-northern-beltline-critical-for-alabama-says-i-65-should-be-widened-but-not-top-priority |access-date = July 1, 2024 |website = 1819 News |language = en-US }}</ref>
{{-}}

=== Interstate 490 (Illinois) ===
{{main|Interstate 490 (Illinois)}}
{{infobox road small
|header_type=UC
|state=IL
|type=Future
|route=490
|location=[[Franklin Park, Illinois|Franklin Park]] to [[Des Plaines, Illinois|Des Plaines]]
|length_mi=6.00
}}

Interstate 490, also known as the O'Hare West Bypass and Western O'Hare Beltway, is a six-mile (9.7 km) [[Electronic toll collection|electronic toll highway]] and a beltway that is currently under construction near [[Chicago, Illinois]]; it will run along the west side of [[O'Hare International Airport]]. The tollway will connect [[Interstate 294|I-294]] (Tri-State Tollway) to a western access point to the airport. From there, it will continue northward to an extension of [[Illinois Route 390]] (IL 390, formerly known as the Elgin-O'Hare Expressway) and [[Interstate 90 in Illinois|I-90]] (Jane Addams Memorial Tollway). It is proposed to be finished by 2027.<ref>{{Cite web |date = November 26, 2024 |title = What is I-490 and where is it? What to know about the planned new Illinois tollway |url = https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/where-is-i-490-what-to-know-about-the-planned-new-illinois-tollway/3610200/ |access-date = February 11, 2025 |website = NBC Chicago |language = en-US }}</ref>
{{-}}

=== Interstate 569 ===
{{main|Western Kentucky Parkway}}
{{infobox road small
|header_type=UC
|state=KY
|type=Future
|route=569
|formed=
|location=[[Nortonville, Kentucky|Nortonville]] to [[Beaver Dam, Kentucky|Beaver Dam]]
|length_mi=38.446
}}

In April 2019, the Western Kentucky Parkway was originally proposed as Interstate 369 before being changed Interstate 569 in December 2019 as the Audubon Parkway was proposed to be Interstate 369.<ref>{{Cite web |last1 = Goffinet |first1 = Jared |last2 = Holbrook |first2 = Tanner |date = January 2, 2020 |title = Proposed bill to make W. KY. Pkwy. I-69 spur passes |url = https://www.14news.com/2020/01/02/proposed-bill-make-w-ky-pkwy-i-spur-passes/ |access-date = January 24, 2025 |website = 14news.com |language = en }}</ref>
{{-}}

=== Interstate 685 (Alabama) ===
{{main|Interstate 85 in Alabama}}
{{infobox road small
|header_type=UC
|state=AL
|type=Future
|route=685
|formed=
|location=[[Montgomery, Alabama|Montgomery]]
|length_mi=14.440
}}

Interstate 685 is planned to follow a portion of Interstate 85 when I-85 gets altered on the Montgomery Outer Loop.<ref>{{Cite web |last = Burylo |first = Rebecca |title = 1st phase of Montgomery's Outer Loop opens |url = https://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/story/news/local/2016/01/25/part-montgomery-outer-loop-open-week/79298342/ |access-date = January 30, 2025 |website = Montgomery Advertiser |language = en-US }}</ref>
{{-}}

=== Interstate 685 (North Carolina) ===
{{main|U.S. Route 421 in North Carolina}}
{{infobox road small
|header_type=UC
|state=NC
|type=Future
|route=685
|formed=
|location=[[Greensboro, North Carolina|Greensboro]] to [[Dunn, North Carolina|Dunn]]
|length_mi=89.200
}}

Interstate 685 is a proposed Interstate planned to run along current [[U.S. Route 421|US 421]]. It will be upgraded to Interstate highway standards from [[Interstate 40]] in Greensboro to [[Interstate 95]] in Dunn.<ref>{{Cite web |last = Hammer |first = John |date = September 26, 2019 |title = Gate City Headed For Another Interstate Highway |url = https://www.rhinotimes.com/news/gate-city-headed-for-another-interstate-highway/ |access-date = January 23, 2025 |website = The Rhino Times of Greensboro |language = en-US }}</ref>
{{-}}

=== Interstate 795 (Florida) ===
{{main|Florida State Road 9B}}
{{infobox road small
|header_type=UC
|state=FL
|type=Future
|route=795
|formed=
|location=[[St. Johns, Florida|St. Johns]] to [[Jacksonville, Florida|Jacksonville]]
|length_mi=5.508
}}

Florida State Road 9B is planned to be redesignated Interstate 795 (I-795) when the designation is approved by the [[Federal Highway Administration]] (FHWA) and the [[American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials]] (AASHTO).<ref>{{Cite web |date = August 9, 2018 |title = State Road 9B Opens In St. Johns County; It Will Eventually Be Renamed I-795 |url = https://news.wjct.org/first-coast/2018-08-09/state-road-9b-opens-in-st-johns-county-it-will-eventually-be-renamed-i-795 |access-date = January 23, 2025 |website = WJCT News 89.9 |language = en }}</ref>
{{-}}

=== Interstate 905 ===
{{main|California State Route 905}}
{{infobox road small
|header_type=UC
|state=CA
|type=Future
|route=905
|formed=
|location=[[San Diego, California|San Diego]] to [[Otay Mesa, California|Otay Mesa]]
|length_mi=8.964
}}

Interstate 905 in California is proposed to replace [[California State Route 905]], which connects San Diego to the Mexican border.<ref>{{Cite book |first = Edward |last = Starks |date = January 15, 2025 |title = FHWA Route Log and Finder List |url = https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/national_highway_system/interstate_highway_system/routefinder/index.cfm |access-date = January 24, 2025 |publisher = Federal Highway Administration }}</ref>
{{Clear}}

==See also==
*{{portal-inline|U.S. Roads}}

==References==
{{Reflist}}

==External links==
* [http://www.interstate-guide.com/future.html Future Interstates and Potential Interstate Corridors at Interstate-Guide.com]
* [https://malmeroads.net/ncfutints/ North Carolina's New and Future Interstates at Malmeroads.net]

{{interstates}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Future Interstate Highways}}
[[Category:Proposed Interstate Highways| ]]
[[Category:Lists of proposals|Interstate Highways]]