<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=83.55.108.92</id>
	<title>wiki143 - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=83.55.108.92"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/83.55.108.92"/>
	<updated>2026-09-15T14:38:15Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?title=Bounded_quantifier&amp;diff=3091184</id>
		<title>Bounded quantifier</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?title=Bounded_quantifier&amp;diff=3091184"/>
		<updated>2024-03-27T18:09:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;83.55.108.92: /* Bounded quantifiers in arithmetic */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Short description|Logical quantification that ranges over a subset of the universe of discourse}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{about|bounded quantification in mathematical logic|bounded quantification in type theory|Bounded quantification}}&lt;br /&gt;
In the study of formal theories in [[mathematical logic]], &#039;&#039;&#039;bounded quantifiers&#039;&#039;&#039; (a.k.a. &#039;&#039;&#039;restricted quantifiers&#039;&#039;&#039;) are often included in a formal language in addition to the standard quantifiers &amp;quot;∀&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;∃&amp;quot;. Bounded quantifiers differ from &amp;quot;∀&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;∃&amp;quot; in that bounded quantifiers restrict the range of the quantified variable. The study of bounded quantifiers is motivated by the fact that determining whether a [[Sentence (mathematical logic)|sentence]] with only bounded quantifiers is true is often not as difficult as determining whether an arbitrary sentence is true.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
Examples of bounded quantifiers in the context of [[real analysis]] include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\forall x &amp;gt; 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; - for all &#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039; is larger than 0&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\exists y &amp;lt; 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; - there exists a &#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039; is less than 0&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\forall x \isin \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; - for all &#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039; is a [[real number]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\forall x &amp;gt; 0 \quad \exists y &amp;lt; 0 \quad (x = y^2)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; - every positive number is the square of a negative number&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bounded quantifiers in arithmetic ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Suppose that &#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039; is the language of [[Peano arithmetic]] (the language of [[second-order arithmetic]] or arithmetic in all finite types would work as well).  There are two types of bounded quantifiers: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\forall n &amp;lt; t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\exists n &amp;lt; t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
These quantifiers bind the number variable &#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039; using a numeric term &#039;&#039;t&#039;&#039; not containing &#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039; but which may have other free variables. (&amp;quot;Numeric terms&amp;quot; here means terms such as &amp;quot;1 + 1&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;2&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;2 × 3&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;m&#039;&#039; + 3&amp;quot;, etc.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These quantifiers are defined by the following rules (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; denotes formulas):&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\exists n &amp;lt; t\, \phi \Leftrightarrow \exists n ( n &amp;lt; t \land \phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\forall n &amp;lt; t\, \phi \Leftrightarrow \forall n ( n &amp;lt; t \rightarrow \phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are several motivations for these quantifiers.&lt;br /&gt;
* In applications of the language to [[recursion theory]], such as the [[arithmetical hierarchy]], bounded quantifiers add no complexity.  If &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a [[Decidability (logic)|decidable]] predicate then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\exists n &amp;lt; t \, \phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\forall n &amp;lt; t\,  \phi&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are decidable as well.&lt;br /&gt;
* In applications to the study of [[Peano arithmetic]], the fact that a particular set can be defined with only bounded quantifiers can have consequences for the computability of the set. For example, there is a definition of [[prime number|primality]] using only bounded quantifiers: a number &#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039; is prime if and only if there are not two numbers strictly less than &#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039; whose product is &#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;.  There is no quantifier-free definition of primality in the language &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\langle 0,1,+,\times, &amp;lt;, =\rangle&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, however. The fact that there is a bounded quantifier formula defining primality shows that the primality of each number can be computably decided.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In general, a relation on natural numbers is definable by a bounded formula if and only if it is computable in the linear-time hierarchy, which is defined similarly to the [[polynomial hierarchy]], but with linear time bounds instead of polynomial. Consequently, all predicates definable by a bounded formula are [[ELEMENTARY|Kalmár elementary]], [[context-sensitive grammar|context-sensitive]], and [[primitive recursive]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[arithmetical hierarchy]], an arithmetical formula that contains only bounded quantifiers is called &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Sigma^0_0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta^0_0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Pi^0_0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The superscript 0 is sometimes omitted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bounded quantifiers in set theory ==&lt;br /&gt;
Suppose that &#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039; is the language &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\langle \in, \ldots, =\rangle&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of the [[Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory]], where the ellipsis may be replaced by term-forming operations such as a symbol for the [[powerset]] operation.  There are two bounded quantifiers: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\forall x \in t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\exists x \in t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  These quantifiers bind the set variable &#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039; and contain a term &#039;&#039;t&#039;&#039; which may not mention &#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039; but which may have other free variables.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The semantics of these quantifiers is determined by the following rules:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\exists x \in t\ (\phi) \Leftrightarrow \exists x ( x \in  t \land \phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\forall x \in t\ (\phi) \Leftrightarrow \forall x ( x \in t \rightarrow \phi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A ZF formula that contains only bounded quantifiers is called &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Sigma_0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta_0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Pi_0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This forms the basis of the [[Lévy hierarchy]], which is defined analogously with the arithmetical hierarchy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bounded quantifiers are important in [[Kripke–Platek set theory]] and [[constructive set theory]], where only [[axiom schema of predicative separation|Δ&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; separation]] is included. That is, it includes separation for formulas with only bounded quantifiers, but not separation for other formulas. In KP the motivation is the fact that whether a set &#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039; satisfies a bounded quantifier formula only depends on the collection of sets that are close in rank to &#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039; (as the powerset operation can only be applied finitely many times to form a term). In constructive set theory, it is motivated on [[impredicativity|predicative]] grounds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Subtyping]] — bounded quantification in [[type theory]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[System F-sub|System F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;:&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] — a [[System F|polymorphic]] [[typed lambda calculus]] with bounded quantification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
* {{cite book | author = Hinman, P. | title = Fundamentals of Mathematical Logic | publisher = A K Peters | year = 2005 | isbn = 1-56881-262-0}}&lt;br /&gt;
* {{cite book | author= Kunen, K. |authorlink = Kenneth Kunen| title = Set theory: An introduction to independence proofs | url= https://archive.org/details/settheoryintrodu0000kune | url-access= registration | publisher = Elsevier | year = 1980 | isbn = 0-444-86839-9}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Quantifier (logic)]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Proof theory]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Computability theory]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>83.55.108.92</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>