jmtd's feedback

Feedback on the parent page. Adapted from my mailing list post https://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2025/02/msg00007.html

discussion page deletion

The discussion page template says "The content of discussion pages are deleted after 90 days". I wonder if that's true?

It also leads with an info-box saying "Wiki pages aren't effective place for discussion. Use the mailing-lists or IRC instead. see http://www.debian.org/support ". I disagree and think we should formalize discussions on the wiki.

formalising discussion pages

The first obstable I had for providing feedback to your page was we haven't formalised how that should work. I think we should extend the guidelines to include creating /Discussion sub-pages for feedback, and including the /Discussion link at the top of the page. Perhaps that should go into some page template.

(I've since added this to the DefaultTemplate)

Category Proposed Deletion

We need to describe some principles about how this category should work. How long should a page be listed? How do we handle disputes?

WRT content copyright: This is something I once tried hard to push for, then gave up, but I haven't lost interest in it. However, I think the following might be too strong:

I think it would be more acceptable of we had a default page template which included the copyright table code, OR some other clear way for a new page to have a license chosen easily.

(I've since added this to the DefaultTemplate)

standard way to specify which debian version content applies

It's reasonable for the wiki to have info for non-current Debian releases in some cases (since Freexian provide LTS support, things like oldstable are still in use). But we should probably have clear conventions on how to indicate what version some content is applicable to.

Sometimes, this might be best done by having "exceptions" in a larger page for a given release (like, abreak-out box "in Etch, this is different…"); other times; it probably makes sense for there to be a separate page if the info is too different between releases.

end-goal for these suggestions

I think these should be folded into the stuff linked to from DebianWiki, which (at the moment) is too long and has too many sub-pages, IMHO; so part of tidying this up I think will need to involve removing some things as well as adding them. -- jmtd 2025-05-16 09:16:47

Other

AI-generated content

#debian-www: [18:24:08] <Jon> hmmm. we might need some kind of policy on LLMs for wiki content [18:24:20] <Jon> got some suspicions about [...]

I suggest adding a point saying "content partly or entirely generated using Artificial Intelligence (AI) is prohibited on the wiki." The rationale would be along the same lines as forums.d.n: https://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=159006 -- MaythamAlsudany 2025-03-04 00:18:44