Talk:Practice Statement
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Practice Statement Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Template:WikiProject banner shell
Do you agree with Lord Gardiner's practice statement 1966?
Do you agree with Lord Gardiner's Practice Statement of 1966?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.93.33.10 (talk) 13:32, 6 November 2004 (UTC)
yes i do agree but i think it should have been available to court of appeal instead of them having to rely heavily on the young criteria— Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.22.78.35 (talk) 00:16, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
if the court of appeal was able to use the pratice statment as well as the house of lords, fair enough law reform would take place a lot quicker, but the united kindgon would have no last resort court to make an overall decision, and the hierarchy of the courts would be in disarray. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.161.178 (talk) 18:33, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
- "This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Practice Statement article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject." Bearian (talk) 23:03, 24 May 2025 (UTC)