Talk:OpenAFS

Template:WikiProject banner shell Coda is based on AFS. Are Coda-Features still superior to OpenAFS ? Is Coda still experimental ?

---

CODA's feature that is superior to AFS is that it can do read-write replication. The CODA folks at CMU have expressly said, "CODA is a research project and will never be fully supported." That said there are people who (allegedly) use it in production and there's an ad-hoc bunch of folk supporting each other.

Of course, the same can be said for running TOPS-20 on your Powerbook. :-)

IN another vein, I wonder if this page shouldn't be merged with Andrew File System .

Mizmoose 03:50, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

agreed and proposed: see Talk:Andrew_File_System#merge_proposal. -- Jon Dowland 12:48, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

---

Why is the kernel driver not in the Linux kernel?

If someone has good information on that question, an addition to the page would be appreciated. --Nomeata (talk) 10:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC)