Talk:Counter-Strike: Source
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Counter-Strike: Source Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
User:MiszaBot/config Template:WikiProject banner shell
- REDIRECT Template:Archives
CS Malvinas: Relevance, Importance, & Bias
I have just rewritten Counter-Strike: Source#Modifications's sole enttry, which is currently about Counter-Strike: Malvinas. When I found this section, it was biased in favor of Britain and incorrectly, repeatedly insisted that this was a standalone game, not simply a map for CS:S.
I question the relevance & importance of this section altogether, and do not think it should have its own article. While the controversy and hacking may warrant a brief mention, they are not the extent of CS:S's modifications.
I think a solid way forward for the article (regardless of if we keep the Malvinas mention) would be to turn the "Modifications" section into "Notable Modifications" and list/describe common CS:S gamemodes such as gungame, kz, surf, jailbreak, etc and a separate mention for the game's huge mapping scene. Malvinas could be mentioned here, along with the controversy, though I am again not sure if it should remain at all.
Any guidance appreciated.
Kaceydotme (talk) 21:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Realized something like what I would like to do for CSS has been done for Garry's Mod: Garry's Mod#User-created content Kaceydotme (talk) 04:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)