User talk:Johnteslade
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
A book page
Hello, Johnteslade would you do page on Swimming Savant. I as an author am not in position. Looking forward hearing you!--109.93.177.115 (talk) 08:38, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of NU NRG for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NU NRG is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NU NRG (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:49, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Green Wing characters
A tag has been placed on Category:Green Wing characters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 17:35, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Janitor (Scrubs) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janitor (Scrubs) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Spinixster (chat!) 14:46, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Bob Kelso for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Kelso until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Spinixster (chat!) 14:22, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Times Top 100 Graduate Employers for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Times Top 100 Graduate Employers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.