Talk:Go ranks and ratings
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Go ranks and ratings Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "English variant notice". Template:WikiProject banner shell Template:Archives Template:Reqphoto
Winning probabilities for IGS
The table currently gives the values 71.9%, 84.2%, 91.1% and the reference [8] is broken.
I get the values 58.0%, 64.0%, 68.0% from the reference http://pandanet-igs.com/communities/pandanet/60 and the following calculations (which you can enter in WolframAlpha):
- solve p*84 + (1-p)*(-116) = 0
- solve p*72 + (1-p)*(-128) = 0
- solve p*64 + (1-p)*(-136) = 0
I plan to fix the values and the reference in 1 week. Egnau (talk) 02:29, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
After further research it turns out IGS had a rating system change in 2005, so my guess is that the table values were for the old system. Egnau (talk) 20:36, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
EGF rating table
I am confused about the EGF rating table in the article. It goes up to 7 dan amateur or 1 dan professional, and then suddenly jumps immediately to 8 dan professional. I.e from 2700 EGF rating to 2800 and above there is a huge leap in rank. Can someone confirm if this is correct ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.191.205.220 (talk) 23:21, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah, there was a mistake. -Koppapa (talk) 10:49, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Go ranks and ratings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130619200219/http://www.nihonkiin.or.jp/lesson/knowledge-e/dankyu.htm to http://www.nihonkiin.or.jp/lesson/knowledge-e/dankyu.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130910232529/http://www.gobond.nl/Generiek/ToonPagina.php?Pagina=14 to http://gobond.nl/Generiek/ToonPagina.php?Pagina=14
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:57, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
The EGF rating algorithm has changed
The rating algorithm was updated in 2021. Can anyone update it? Source: https://europeangodatabase.eu/EGD/EGF_rating_system.php DKSRatingSystem (talk) 11:46, 27 October 2024 (UTC)