Talk:Rule of inference

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Revision as of 12:00, 17 June 2025 by imported>DYKUpdateBot (Article appeared on DYK on 17 June 2025, adding {{DYK talk}})
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Latest comment: 16 March by Phlsph7 in topic Changes to the article
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Tmbox[[Category:Template:GA/Topic good articles|Rule of inference]]

<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".

Template:WikiProject banner shell Template:Merged from Template:Tmbox User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis

Changes to the article

I was thinking about implementing changes to this article with the hope of moving it in the direction of GA status. Most of the text is currently unreferenced. Usually, the lead should summarize information found in the body of the article, not present new information, like it is done here.

Contentwise, a lot of information is currently missing. There are countless rules of inference and at least the most important ones should be discussed. It should be better explained that rules of inference belong to systems of logic. Different systems of logic have different rules of inference, like the contrasts between propositional logic and predicate logic or between classical and intuitionistic logic. Another point to mention would be the different formalisms of Hilbert systems, natural deduction, and sequent calculus. Other things to discuss would be the relation between rules of inference and logical truths, the problem of fallacies, and the role of rules of inference in the philosophy of logic regarding the contrast between the semantic and the syntactic conception of logic. Since some of these topics are quite abstract, one could add a section called "Basic concepts" to explain what logic, systems of logic, propositions, and inferences are. It further wouldn't hurt to mention some applications in fields like mathematical reasoning, computer science, expert systems, automated theorem proving, etc.

There are more things to consider, but they can be addressed later since the ones mentioned so far will already involve a lot of work to implement. I was hoping to get some feedback on these ideas and possibly other suggestions. Phlsph7 (talk) 13:36, 16 March 2025 (UTC) Talk:Rule of inference/GA1Reply

Did you know nomination

Template:Did you know nominations/Rule of inference