Latest comment: 4 September 20112 comments1 person in discussion
Number of speakers of Megrelian Language is not correct. Firstly, it is true that nobody really counts it officially, but we can deduce this number from the census conducted in Megrelia.
According to recent (2010) census only 450 000 persons live in Megrelian. Large part of them living in Poti, Abasha, Senaki, don't speak or almost don't speak Megrelian. Therefore, number of speakers would not be more than 400 000 within the Megrelia. Around 30 000 live in Gali district of Abkhazia and around 180 000 Megrels are internally displaced after the conflicts in Abkhaz region of Georgia.
So, the maximum number of speakers would be 610 000 but no way 800 000(!). I have read some book, according to which number of persons having Megrelian family names in Georgia are around 800 000. However, Many of them, who have long lived in other parts of Gerogia, except Megrelia and Abkhazia, don't speak this language and do not transfer them to next generation.
The trend of decrease of the language speakers is so evident that UNESCO has enlisted Megrelian among the endangered language.
one more thing: Recently wikipedia page in Megrel langauge has been created. Could you please not this somewhere in the article or in the references or in the external links or at some other place?
This is the megrel wikipeida: www.xmf.wikipedia.org
here is some data about number of speakers. Please check the page 4.
Again, number of speakers is 400 000 - 500 000 BUT in no way 800 000. Eight hundred thousand is the approximate number of persons having megrelian family names which certain is very different from number of speakers!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Machirkholi (talk • contribs) 07:05, 4 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Charkviani
Latest comment: 23 November 20143 comments3 people in discussion
According to Simon Sebag Montefiroe, Candide Charkviani was a Mengrelian "Beria was a Mingrelian, so was Charkviani who had run it since", Pg. 632 of Stalin: Court of the Red Tsar. Someone has informed me he was a Svan but I would appreciate a reference please. Seth J. Frantzman (talk) 21:03, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
To 213.157.193.*: apparently the facts (esp. numbers of speakers) which you have repeatedly placed on this page are in disagreement with the sources originally found by the authors of this article. Please either state here your sources and/or your rationale for continually placing these facts here or cease continued altering of this page. -- Grunt 01:38, 2004 Jun 14 (UTC)
here is some data about number of speakers. Please check the page 4.
Again, number of speakers is 400 000 - 500 000 BUT in no way 800 000. Eight hundred thousand is the approximate number of persons having megrelian family names which certain is very different from number of speakers!! --Machirkholi (talk) 07:05, 4 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Relationship to Georgian language
Latest comment: 31 December 20052 comments1 person in discussion
To those readers who insist on deleting the information about the relationship between the Laz and Georgian languages: the date of separation between the Laz/Megrelian language subfamily and the Georgian language is given by several linguists, including Georgian ones. Ditto for the fact that Laz, Georgian, and Megrelian are mutually unintelligible — which is also attested by Megrelian native speakers. Jorge Stolfi12:21, 30 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
Dear stoffi. Georgian scientist are often subiective. Megrelian and especially Svan are much more older than Georgian. Iriatoni
Please explain what you mean by this statement. Georgian, Laz, Svan and Megrelian refer to the modern languages. All languages change gradually with time, so it is meaningless to say that a language is older than another. Moreover, there are no records of Svan or Megrelian older than 200--300 years, are there? We can only say (based on differences) when the lineages that resulted in the modern languages split apart. All my sources give the same tree: A-->(B,C); C-->(D,E); E-->(F,G); B-->Svan; D-->Georgian; F-->Laz; G-->Megrelian. Do you dispute this? Jorge Stolfi19:55, 31 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
100.000 is the population of only one zugdidi District.
To User:Iriatoni: I do not understand what you mean with the phrase "separated by Georgian and Turkic tribes". Do you mean "separated by invasions of Georgian and Turkic tribes", or "separated into northern (Georgian) and southern (Turkish) communities"? Please clarify. (And please refrain from gratuituosly insulting people who spent many hours putting together this article.) Jorge Stolfi12:21, 30 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
yes, I think the give data is wrong. Laz and Megrelian were separated much earlier and that happened around the middle of first millenium AD, rather than 500 years ago and naturally they were not separated by Turkic tribes, but rather by Kartic (Georgian) migrations from the south, when the South Georgians settled the area between modern day Megrelia and Lazistan. The descendants of those south Georgians are the Gurians and Ajarians, while the Laz and Megrelians got separated... —Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])
Spoken in Abkhazia
Latest comment: 13 July 201114 comments5 people in discussion
First, please explain to me what is "encyclopedic data" and why you highlight it every single time. Second, what do you mean by "The Abkhaz name is not deleting"?--ComtesseDeMingrélie04:59, 26 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
FIRST, the Abkhaz name for Mingrelian language is Агыршәа Agyrshwa just as "Georgian: მეგრული ენა megruli ena". Because, The names are "encyclopedic data", both spoken in the Georgian-speaking and Abkhaz-speaking areas. SECOND, "The Abkhaz name is not deleting" :-) --Kmoksy (talk) 23:35, 26 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
To be honest, I don't understand your point. Armenians have one of the largest diaspora in the world. Now should we include Georgian, Russian, English and French names of the Armenian language? –BruTeTalk14:04, 7 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
(Out of subject) Dear friend Brute, a person can easily understand your politic ideas from your edits. You'r acting like a sinless angel here :) maybe you can change somethings here as your opinion with using wikipedia policies cutely but don't forget that you can't change the truths. Arguni (talk) 00:57, 8 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Dear Arguni, I really don't try to use the encyclopaedia as a platform of my politic ideas. I want to judge the issue, but you just keep on not answering the above arguments raised by ComtesseDeMingrélie. Just try to prove that the Abkhazian spelling is relevant for this article rather than edit warring, or discussion is over. –BruTeTalk08:36, 8 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
I don't understand why the name of the language must be indicated in Abkhazian language? If De Facto Abkhaz government was giving some status to the language, then there could be some ground to argue that the name of the language must be specified in Abkhazian language too, but now I don't see any reason for this. Anyway, there would be no harm in indicating the Megrelian langauge name in Abkhaz langauge, as it (i.e. Megrelian Language) was always present in what is called today Abkhazia! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Machirkholi (talk • contribs) 00:58, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Removed from info box. This should really go in the Zan languages article:
Zan (Colchian)[www.icgl.org/articles/ReviewofColchian.doc K'olxuri Ena (Colchian Language)]
Shouldn't be covered here if we don't even mention it there. Should also not be used here unless it's a common synonym for Zan in English, which it is not. — kwami (talk) 09:59, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Machirkholi (talk) 00:59, 13 July 2011 (UTC)MachirkholiMachirkholi (talk) 00:59, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Not deleting
Latest comment: 13 March 20115 comments2 people in discussion
Abkhazia is a page for the REGION, and Mingrelian is spoken there, that is why it is noted. Mingrelian language is not a page for a region where many languages are spoken, it is a page for a SPECIFIC language. There is no Mingrelian notation on Abkhaz language page either.--ComtesseDeMingrélie01:14, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 27 July 20244 comments3 people in discussion
What is this: "Mingrelian ....spoken in .... by Georgians of Mingrelian origin". What is this? The term "Georgians of Mingrelian origin" used by Georgian politicians. Mingrelians use a different language from Georgians. The term "Georgians of Mingrelian origin" is not neutral and not scientific! Let us again: This wikipedia is not Georgia's Wikipedia! --Kmoksy (talk) 09:11, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
This is really stupid to write. Megrel Language is closely related to Georgian. Georgian language has been for centuries language of Church for Megrel and currently language also official language and MOST IMPORTANTLY - Megrel people themselves consider to be Georgians. So please do not add this stupid remark that Megrelians are not Georgians! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Machirkholi (talk • contribs) 01:02, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 22 March 20117 comments5 people in discussion
I have protected the page to encourage consensus building rather than shouting matches and editwarring. IF you all agree that protection is no longer needed I will unprotect.·Maunus·ƛ·17:30, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
What do you actually mean? The Georgian name for Mingrelian is a legitimate part of the lead for two simple reasons: first, Mingrelian is mostly spoken in Georgia where Georgian is the official language; second, virtually all Mingrelians are bilingual in Mingrelian and Georgian. What has the Abkhaz name for Mingrelian to do with all of these? Most Mingrelians don't speak Abkhaz and most Abkhaz have no knowledge of Mingrelian. --KoberTalk04:03, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
This article is not a dictionary and this vocabulary does not serve any meaningful purpose here. As for me learning something,I do not need to be taught by a propagandist like Arguni what these words mean when every single member of my family is a Mingrelian and I have spent summers there all my life. --ComtesseDeMingrélie01:30, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Arguni, you are being provocative. If you can't engage in a normal conversion without insulting others, you are never going to be respected or taken seriously. Back to the topic, a few words in Mingrelian in a proper context would not be out of place here, but I don't get the idea of having this list in the article. In general, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. We have Wiktionary for that matter. --KoberTalk03:59, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Personal attacks again? Now its pretty much clear that you cannot simply live without insulting others. I have tried to give the discussion an appearance of normality; to no avail, I see. Your permanent upsurges in aggression amid the discussion is a testimony that you will never learn what Wikipedia is for. I think the best way to deal with this user is to ignore him/her.--KoberTalk06:00, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Look to previous message of ComtesseDeMingrélie and see who is insulting others. I was bored to be called as "propagandist" by that person. I want to contribute here but you all have antipathy against me and you all want to block my contributions here. The "sample" section is good idea for this article (i know this is not a dictionary but this article can give some informations to readers about samples from vocabulary of this language), i will find some poems or some texts for this section, then maybe we can discuss about it. Arguni (talk) 16:54, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
The only thing to contribute to these pages are ethnic tensions and encouragement of separatism. This is why you do not limit yourself to Lazs but spread lies about Mingrelians, Svans, and support the propaganda revert war waged by Apswaaa. This useless vocabulary is just part of your attempt to appear more constructive, when all you want is to have the page unblocked - as you stated above - so that you can pollute it further. --ComtesseDeMingrélie22:31, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Show me a proof which i support Apswaa. Don't say lie here to be shown as neutral in this subject. Leave your prejudiced blames about me, instead of blame me as "seperatist propaganda maker" pls find a proof in my edits (except my nervous messages against your editwarring, already i apologized for that messages from you and Brute in here). Arguni (talk) 22:56, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Few examples, so where is the rest of it? These messages about Mingrelians (which i repent and thinking about it too much) were irritable reflections by me against you and your other friends Kober's and Brute's needless editwars about Lazs; here, here (2), here (3), here (4), here (5), here (6) ... the other of my messages were about changing "Kartvelian languages" name to "South Caucasian languages". Arguni (talk) 23:22, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
No need to find a source, Lazs (me too) call themselves as Turk because of national identity, i belong to Turkish community, but this doesn't mean that we forgot our Laz ethnicity and language, and also this situation doesn't prove that Lazs are Turkified. You think as unilateral in this subject. Arguni (talk) 23:58, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Believe it or not, Georgia was there before Turkey/Ottoman Empire ever existed, so I doubt you can win the Turkified/Georgianized argument.--ComtesseDeMingrélie00:14, 23 March 2011 (UTC) The only reasonReply
In any case, it is written by American-Armenian Scholars Batalden, which is an Anglicanized form of Bataldian. Armenians - along with the Russians, Abkhazs like Apswaaa, and the ones like Arguni - are known for working towards Georgia's destruction through spreading falsehood. That is why they wont ask the Mingrelians and Svans themselves before jumping to conclusions, they do not care what we think. That is why they were so eager to take part in ethnic cleansing during the expulsion of civilians from Abkhazia.--ComtesseDeMingrélie00:38, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Still you are consulting me, i told myself to you 100 times but you don't want to understand me, It is very depressing to live in a time when it is easier to split the atom than to break down a prejudice. Please don't make demagogy about this subject with using my nickname. I'm sad for Mingrelians and Georgians too who were killed in the Abkhazian war. Even you don't know my views about ethnic cleansing in Abkhazia. But you are easily consulting me with a severe blame. Big shame! Arguni (talk) 00:52, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Wikipedia created
Latest comment: 13 July 20115 comments2 people in discussion
Latest comment: 7 January 20161 comment1 person in discussion
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Mingrelian language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add Template:Tlx after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add Template:Tlx to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
I have just modified one external link on Mingrelian language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes: