This is the current revision of this page, as edited by imported>MalnadachBot at 00:04, 10 February 2023(Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 00:04, 10 February 2023 by imported>MalnadachBot(Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
Support as nominator --Yosarian (talk) 18:09, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Oppose, speedy close, it has to be used and stable in an article. See if/where it fits and leave it there... if it can remain there without controversy for a few weeks then you can retry this nomination. grenグレン 21:30, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
OK, should I leave the subpage in the meanwhile? Yosarian (talk) 21:40, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Currently the image is in flower and lingam. I'll check this again at the end of the nomination if there is consensus to promote. MER-C 09:57, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Comment It's not really very in focus: The depth of field doesn't encompass the hand. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 20:55, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Does this need rotated? I can't tell what should be vertical. Rmhermen (talk) 01:24, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Weak oppose - Blurry, and there are issues with DOF. — neuro(talk)(review) 04:20, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Regretful Oppose - I like the colours, composition and subject matter, but we can't overlook the unsharpness and DOF issues. Sorry. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 12:13, 22 March 2009 (UTC)