This is the current revision of this page, as edited by imported>Jonesey95 at 16:00, 15 February 2024(Fix Linter errors.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 16:00, 15 February 2024 by imported>Jonesey95(Fix Linter errors.)
Support as nominator --Muhammad(talk) 14:42, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Support per nom. DurovaCharge! 04:18, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Unfortunately this leaves me squinting. The wings are soft and the body is dark and doesn't contrast with the background. Noodle snacks (talk) 04:40, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
It's camouflaged, Noodle. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 17:29, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Support Yes, the wings don't stand out too well, but they're supposed to be camouflaged, so I can't complain there. Very nice picture. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 17:29, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
The wings are soft, they stand out very well. It is the body that doesn't, and that is just a function of lighting imo. Noodle snacks (talk) 05:52, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Oppose per Noodle snacks. It also doesn't illustrate its camouflage particularly well due to the shallow DOF. I'm sure that different lighting or another background would produce a superior image and for easily replicated shots that is enough for me to oppose. --Leivick (talk) 18:12, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Support per nom. I think the whole camouflage issue is trivial. ~ ωαdεstεr16♣kiss mei'm Irish♣ 02:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)