Talk:Switch (BDSM)

Reversing the merger

This merger was to highly contra productive. The Spanish, Italian, Dutch and German articles clearly show that at least Switch, Top (BDSM) and Bottom (BDSM) are relevant single lemmata. Literature given there proofs this as well. Additionaly the merger was not tagged as described in Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages.

The argument about this being an "good compare-and-contrast article" is doesn't make any sense. I would like to see what would happen if I had merged capitalism&communism into an "compare-and-contrast article" deleting the original ones only because nobody answered to my merger ideas. Its really strange that there was allegedly no response to the pre-merger suggestions, nevertheless even the smallest amount of thoughtfulness should have prevented this. The intention to merge homosexual and BDSM topics in order to "compare-and-contrast" them while deleting the source article is at least original research if not POV. --Nemissimo 12:51, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

LGBT?

There doesn't seem to be anything in this article that is specific to the LGBT community. Should it be in the LGBT WikiProject? -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 05:33, 12 August 2008 (UTC)