Talk:Webby Awards
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Webby Awards Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Template:WikiProject banner shell Template:Annual readership User:MiszaBot/config Template:Archives
5 days left— is Wikipedia in?
We didn't win Best Practices, and it would be nice to win the People's Voice in Best Community. Waste of money, or worth our while? -- user:zanimum
Senator2029 ❮talk❯ 05:48, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Are web awards just click-through scams?
I was always under the impression that website awards were mainly just ways of getting people to put a link to the award site on their pages, driving traffic to the award site. "Your website won an award! Put this image (and link to our site) on your site!" was all it took. Then the award site would make money from ads or partnerships with sites they linked to. Maybe the Webbys are above that, but I'm skeptical. A lot of awards sites are/were scams. — mjb 11:05, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Senator2029 ❮talk❯ 05:48, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Colloquially
If people, such as myself, have to look up the word, "colloquially" (4th word in the article), in the dictionary... should it be on Wikipedia? Food for thought.