This is the current revision of this page, as edited by imported>JGXenite at 13:10, 30 November 2008(Reverted to revision 254543072 by John254; Vandalism. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 13:10, 30 November 2008 by imported>JGXenite(Reverted to revision 254543072 by John254; Vandalism. (TW))
This image is of high resolution, with good contrast and accurate exposure. There are no others like it on Wikipedia, it has not been digitally manipulated and is available in the public domain. The church is centred in the image, with the name in the bottom left hand corner and tree branches draped across the top right, illustrating the surroundings the church is located within.
Support as nominator --Kiano1234 (talk) 19:31, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose subject obscured by branches, very grainy and with purple tinging just about everywhere. --Leivick (talk) 19:37, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose. There's a tree in the way. Kaldari (talk) 20:19, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose per above, plus the sign is distracting (all or none). ~ Wadester16 (talk) 21:00, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Despite the "hype" in the nom, this photo illustrates what a FP is not: Tilted, cut off, partially obscured. --Janke | Talk 23:17, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Cluttered, cut off, obscured, & not horizontal. Skier Dude (talk) 03:06, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Not promoted . --John254 03:44, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
