Talk:EMILY's List

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Revision as of 23:55, 18 March 2024 by imported>GreenC bot (Add {{reflist-talk}} to #Potential Sources (via reftalk bot))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Latest comment: 17 October 2023 by 67.170.42.135 in topic Seeking feedback re: endorsement guideline
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:WikiProject banner shellTemplate:Connected contributor

Potential Sources

[1]

[2]

Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; refs with no name must have content

Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; refs with no name must have content

Tuk28507 (talk) 19:37, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Template:Reflist-talk

Untitled

I am a former intern of EMILY's List. However, I am doing this for a class project and all additions proposed are based off research and high quality sources, in addition to extensive research.

username:Akl0608

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

File:Sciences humaines.svg This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 October 2018 and 5 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lizgonzalez511.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:57, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Reply

POV

POV. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.58.83.44 (talk) 05:22, 19 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Last paragraph

I'm disinclined to change elements of an article that I know nothing about, but the last paragraph of the article as written made very little sense to me. Aaron 00:26, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)

I've talked to an EMILY's list employee and she has clealy specified that EMILY's List is a national organization. The Australian EMILY's List is a seperate organization and thus should be moved to a seperate article. I may do this if I get a chance, unless someone beats me to it. --Vince 20:01, 1 September 2006 (UTC)Reply


Temporarily removed this line "As of 2006, it was the largest political action committee in the United States (slightly edging out the National Rifle Association).Template:Fact" I have no problem with it, and normally would have left it alone but in my view that's an especially bold claim that has to have a citation with it before it should be posted.--GenkiDama 18:11, 13 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Recent reverts

Regarding the recent edits on the '04 and '06 elections, please follow wp guidlines (WP:REF) regarding dead links -- they are not a justification for passage deletion. If you have an issue with this passage, feel free to edit it, and don't forget to add a citation for your edit. I noticed on your profile it's been a while since you edited; welcome back, and hope you stay a while! --TrustTruth (talk) 02:22, 27 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Nationalistic

This article does not cover things from an international perspective. -- John (Daytona2 · Talk · Contribs) 08:00, 9 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

John Lynch?

If the claims made in this Republican blog post are true this PAC does not seem to be exclusively focused on female candidates. --98.229.138.91 (talk) 17:17, 5 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Limited to Democrats at one point?

Wasn't EMILY's List originally non-partisan, but at some point after the "Republican Revolution" of 1994, limited its support to Democrats because, as somebody in the organization put it, giving money to a Republican candidate was considered giving money to pro-life Newt Gingrich? —Preceding unsigned comment added by That Don Guy (talkcontribs) 16:13, 11 November 2009 (UTC)Reply


I can't imagine anyone thinking EMILY's List was ever bipartisan. In fact, just doing a bit of research, it doesn't even seem they have really ever supported an independent candidate, even if they had the overall same ideals as the list's mission statement. And really, if their only intention was to support strong female progressive candidates who are pro-choice, they should support independent candidates. Good or bad, I think it is safe to say that EMILY's list is decidedly a Democrat organization.
But obviously, if you can find documentation that someone speaking FOR the organization made such a statement, it would be worth adding to the history of the group. CleverTitania (talk) 18:20, 15 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

References in popular media

Press Secretary C. J. Cregg in The West Wing made reference to EMILY's List: "Early Money Is Like Yeast -- it raises the dough". Next time I see that episode, I'll come back here and complete the entry and citation if someone doesn't beat me to it.esrob (talk) 19:11, 18 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on EMILY's List. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add Template:Tlx after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add Template:Tlx to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at Template:Tlx).

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on EMILY's List. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:53, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on EMILY's List. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:03, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Money and Politics

Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment

— Assignment last updated by Tuk28507 (talk) 18:56, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Seeking feedback re: endorsement guideline

This comment serves as notice of a discussion that editors of this article may be interested in: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums#Interpretation of endorsement guideline re: EMILY's List/Laphonza Butler? 67.170.42.135 (talk) 01:16, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  1. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".