Correlative-based fallacies

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Revision as of 21:43, 2 June 2025 by imported>Psychastes (Removed {{One source}} tag: it's a stub, one source is fine)
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Template:Use dmy dates In philosophy, correlative-based fallacies are informal fallacies based on correlative conjunctions.

Correlative conjunctions

A correlative conjunction is a relationship between two statements where one must be false and the other true. In formal logic this is known as the exclusive or relationship; traditionally, terms between which this relationship exists have been called contradictories.

Examples

In the following example, statement b explicitly negates statement a: Template:Ordered list

Statements can also be mutually exclusive, without explicitly negating each other as in the following example: Template:Ordered list

Fallacies

Fallacies based on correlatives include:[1]

False dilemma or false correlative.
Here something which is not a correlative is treated as a correlative, excluding some other possibility.
Denying the correlative
where an attempt is made to introduce another option into a true correlative.
Suppressed correlative
where the definitions of a correlative are changed so that one of the options includes the other, making one option impossible.

See also

References

Template:Reflist

External links

Correlational fallacy in psychologyTemplate:Fallacies

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".