Talk:Jiddu Krishnamurti
Script error: No such module "Message box".
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jiddu Krishnamurti Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Banner shell". User:MiszaBot/config
Mystic
I can agree that the young Krishnamurti was a mystic. However, at maturity he does not posit mystical ideas. He smacks of New Age, he speaks of personal enlightenment, he speaks of religions, but in the end he does not claim to have supernatural insight.
Same as the Buddha, he did not claim that his teachings are based upon the supernatural (gods, angels, clairvoyance, channeling, etc.).
Nietzsche, Heidegger, Derrida, Lacan, Foucault were irrationalists. But they were not mystics. tgeorgescu (talk) 03:04, 24 October 2024 (UTC)