Talk:Technology in Star Trek
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Technology in Star Trek Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Template:Old AfD multi Template:WikiProject banner shell Template:Merged-from
Merger with Star Trek
I honestly think this whole article would be better served with a short paragraph on the main article on the universe. Thoughts? Nerflet (talk) 19:08, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Cleanup
The article does not look like an encyclopedia article the way it is now; it looks more like a debate forum or a TV review. I would list it on Votes for Deletion, but I have tried that already with other Star Trek pages and I don't think it would work. Resistance (against Star Trek) is futile. --NoPetrol 01:40, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Merger proposal
Template:Discussion top Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subspace (Star Trek) (2nd nomination), it has been suggested that Subspace (Star Trek) be merged either here, Warp drive (Star Trek), or Hyperspace (science fiction). Any ideas? I prefer here. Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:06, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
In case anybody still cares about carrying out a merge more than two years after there was a consensus to merge but no consensus on a merge target, I feel like Warp drive (Star Trek) would be the best target, since subspace is directly related to the starship drive systems in Star Trek, and often (although not always, since in Star Trek (tech) is (tech) and can pretty much mean literally anything from episode to episode) is just used as shorthand for "not in Warp". --Lost tiree, lost dutch :O (talk) 01:41, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Whoops, I totally forgot what "subspace" means in Star Trek lingo and its use in subspace communications and etc. Yeah, it should be merged here, not to Warp Drive. To be fair, it's all fake, so it's not like I forgot anything real. --Lost tiree, lost dutch :O (talk) 01:46, 21 September 2013 (UTC) Template:Discussion bottom