In His Own Write

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Revision as of 11:21, 24 May 2025 by imported>OAbot (Open access bot: url-access updated in citation with #oabot.)
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Script error: No such module "about". Template:Use dmy dates Template:Good article Template:EngvarB Script error: No such module "Infobox".Template:Template otherScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Template:Wikidata image

In His Own Write is a 1964 nonsense book by the English musician John Lennon. Lennon's first book, it consists of poems and short stories ranging from eight lines to three pages, as well as illustrations.

After Lennon showed journalist Michael Braun some of his writings and drawings, Braun in turn showed them to Tom Maschler of publisher Jonathan Cape, who signed Lennon in January 1964. He wrote most of the content expressly for the book, though some stories and poems had been published years earlier in the Liverpool music publication Mersey Beat. Lennon's writing style is informed by his interest in English writer Lewis Carroll, while humorists Spike Milligan and "Professor" Stanley Unwin inspired his sense of humour. His illustrations imitate the style of cartoonist James Thurber. Many of the book's pieces consist of private meanings and in-jokes, while also referencing Lennon's interest in physical abnormalities and expressing his anti-authority sentiments.

The book was both a critical and commercial success, selling around 300,000 copies in Britain. Reviewers praised it for its imaginative use of wordplay and favourably compared it to the later works of James Joyce, though Lennon was unfamiliar with him. Later commentators have discussed the book's prose in relation to Lennon's songwriting, both in how it differed from his contemporary writing and in how it anticipates his later work, heard in songs like "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds" and "I Am the Walrus". Released amidst Beatlemania, its publication reinforced perceptions of Lennon as "the smart one" of the Beatles, and helped to further legitimise the place of pop musicians in society.

Since its release, the book has been translated into several languages. In 1965, Lennon released another book of nonsense literature, A Spaniard in the Works. He abandoned plans for a third collection and did not publish any other books in his lifetime. Victor Spinetti and Adrienne Kennedy adapted his two books into a one-act play, The Lennon Play: In His Own Write, produced by the National Theatre Company and first performed in June 1968 to mixed reviews.

Template:TOC limit

Background

Earliest influences

Template:Multiple image

John Lennon was artistic as a child, though unfocused on his schooling.Template:Sfn He was mostly raised by his aunt Mimi Smith, an avid reader who helped shape the literary inclinations of both Lennon and his step-siblings.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Answering a questionnaire in 1965 about which books made the largest impression on him before the age of eleven, he identified Lewis Carroll's nonsense works Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass, as well as Kenneth Grahame's children's book The Wind in the Willows.Template:Sfn He added: "These books made a great impact and their influence will last for the rest of my life".Template:SfnTemplate:Refn He reread Carroll's books at least once a year,Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn being intrigued by the use of wordplay in pieces like "Jabberwocky".Template:Sfn His childhood friend Pete Shotton remembered Lennon reciting the poem "at least a few hundred times", and that, "from a very early age, John's ultimate ambition was to one day 'write an AliceTemplate:' himself".Template:Sfn Lennon's first ever poem, "The Land of the Lunapots", was a fourteen-line piece written in the style of "Jabberwocky",Template:Sfn using Carrollian words like "wyrtle" and "graftiens".Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Where Carroll's poem opens Template:"'Twas brillig, and theTemplate:Nbsp...",[1] Lennon's begins:Template:Sfn

T'was custard time and as I
Snuffed at the haggie pie pie
The noodles ran about my plunk
Which rode my wrytle uncle drunk
...

From around the age of eight, Lennon spent much of his time drawing, inspired by cartoonist Ronald Searle's work in the St Trinian's School cartoon strips.Template:Sfn He later enjoyed the illustrations of cartoonist James Thurber and began imitating his style around the age of fifteen.Template:Sfn Uninterested in fine art and unable to create realistic likenesses, he enjoyed doodling and drawing witty cartoons,Template:Sfn usually made with either a black pen or a fountain pen with black ink.Template:Sfn Filling his school notebooks with vignettes, poetry and cartoons,Template:Sfn he drew inspiration from British humorists such as Spike Milligan and "Professor" Stanley Unwin,Template:Sfn including Milligan's radio comedy programme The Goon Show.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn He admired the programme's unique humour, characterised by attacks on establishment figures, surreal humour and punning wordplay, later writing that it was "the only proof that the WORLD was insane".[2] Lennon collected his work in a school exercise book dubbed the Daily Howl,Template:Sfn later described by Lennon's bandmate George Harrison as "jokes and avant-garde poetry".Template:Sfn Made in the style of a newspaper, its cartoons and ads featured wordplay and gags,Template:Sfn such as a column reporting: "Our late editor is dead, he died of death, which killed him".Template:Sfn

Despite Lennon's love of literature, he was a chronic misspeller, saying in a 1968 interview that he "never got the idea of spelling",Template:Sfn finding it less important than conveying an idea or story.Template:Sfn Beatles historian Mark Lewisohn raises the possibility that Lennon had dyslexia – a condition that often went undiagnosed in the 1940s and 1950s – but counters that he exhibited no other related symptoms.Template:Sfn Lennon's mother, Julia Lennon, similarly wrote with uncertain spelling and displayed weak grammar in her writing.Template:Sfn American professor James Sauceda contends that Unwin's use of fractured English was the foremost influence on Lennon's writing style,Template:Sfn and in a 1980 interview with Playboy, Lennon stated that the main influences on his writing "were always Lewis Carroll and The Goon Show, a combination of that".[3]

Art college and Bill Harry

Although most teachers at Quarry Bank High School for Boys were annoyed at Lennon's lack of focus, he impressed his English master, Philip Burnett, who suggested he go to art school at the Liverpool College of Art.Template:Sfn In 2006, Burnett's wife, June Harry, recalled of Lennon's cartoons: "I was intrigued by what I saw. They weren't academic drawings but hilarious and quite disturbing cartoons."Template:Sfn She continued: "Phil enjoyed John's slant on life. He told me, 'He's a bit of a one-off. He's bright enough, but not much apart from music and doing his cartoons interests him.Template:'"Template:Sfn Having failed his GCE "O" levels, Lennon was admitted into the Liverpool College of Art solely on the basis of his art portfolio.Template:Sfn While attending the school he befriended fellow student Bill Harry in 1957.Template:Sfn When Harry heard that Lennon wrote poetry he asked to see some, later recalling: "He was embarrassed at firstTemplate:Nbsp... I got the impression that he felt that writing poetry was a bit effeminate because he had this tough macho image".Template:Sfn After further pressing, Lennon relented and showed Harry a poem, who remembered it as "a rustic poem, it was pure British humour and comedy, and I loved it".Template:Sfn Harry retrospectively stated that Lennon's writing style, especially his use of malapropisms, reminded him of Unwin.Template:Sfn Harry described his poetry as displaying an "originality in its sheer lunacy", but found his sense of humour "absurdly cruel with its obsession with cripples, spastics and torture".Template:Sfn

After Harry started the Liverpool newspaper Mersey Beat in 1961, Lennon made occasional contributions.Template:Sfn His column "Beatcomber", a reference to the "Beachcomber" column of the Daily Express,Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn included poems and short stories.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn He typed his early pieces with an Imperial Good Companion Model T typewriter.Template:Sfn By August 1962, his original typewriter was either broken or unavailable to him. He borrowed an acquaintance's, spurring him to write more prose and poetry.Template:Sfn He enjoyed typewriters,Template:Sfn but found that his slow typing left him unmotivated to write for long periods of time and so he focused on shorter pieces.Template:Sfn He left keystroke errors uncorrected to add further wordplay.Template:Sfn Excited about being in print, he brought 250 pieces to Harry, telling him he could publish whatever he wanted of them.Template:Sfn Only two stories were published, "Small Sam" and "On Safairy with Whide Hunter", because Harry's fiancée Virginia accidentally threw out the other 248 during a move between offices.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Harry later recalled that after telling him about the accident, Lennon broke down in tears.[4]

Paul McCartney

Lennon's friend and bandmate Paul McCartney also enjoyed Alice in Wonderland, The Goon Show and the works of Thurber, and the two soon bonded through their mutual interests and similar senses of humour.[5] Lennon impressed McCartney, who did not know anyone else that either owned a typewriter or wrote their own poetry. He found hilarious one of Lennon's earliest poems, "The Tale of Hermit Fred", especially its final lines:Template:Sfn

I peel the bagpipes for my wife
And cut all negroes' hair
As breathing is my very life
And stop I do not dare.

Visiting Lennon's 251 Menlove Avenue home one day in July 1958, McCartney found him writing a poem and enjoyed the wordplay of lines like "a cup of teeth" and "in the early owls of the morecombe". Lennon let him help, with the two co-writing the poem "On Safairy with Whide Hunter", its title's origin likely the adventure serial White Hunter. Lewisohn suggests the renaming of the lead character at each appearance was probably Lennon's contribution, while lines that were likely McCartney's include: "Could be the Flying Docker on a case" and "No! But mable next week it will be my turn to beat the bus now standing at platforbe nine". He also suggests the character Jumble Jim was a reference to McCartney's father Jim McCartney.Template:Sfn Lennon typically wrote his pieces by hand at home and would bring them when he and his band, the Beatles, were travelling in a car or van to a gig. Reading the pieces aloud, McCartney and Harrison would often make contributions of their own. Upon returning home, Lennon would type up the pieces, adding what he could remember of his friend's contributions.Template:Sfn

Publication and content

Paul McCartney and John Lennon standing together.
Paul McCartney (left) and John Lennon in June 1964. McCartney contributed an introduction, the book's title and co-wrote two of its pieces with Lennon.

In 1963, Tom Maschler, the literary director of Jonathan Cape, commissioned American journalist Michael Braun to write a book about the Beatles.Template:Sfn Braun began following the band during their Autumn 1963 UK Tour in preparation for his 1964 book Love Me Do: The Beatles' Progress.[6] Lennon showed Braun some of his writings and drawings, and Braun in turn showed them to Maschler, who recalled: "I thought they were wonderful and asked him who wrote them. When he told me John Lennon, I was immensely excited."Template:Sfn At Braun's insistence, Maschler joined him and the band at Wimbledon Palais in London on 14 December 1963.Template:Sfn Lennon showed Maschler more of his drawings, mainly doodles made on scrap pieces of paperTemplate:Sfn that had mostly been done in July 1963 while the Beatles played a residency in Margate.[7] Maschler encouraged him to continue with his pieces and drawings, then selected the title In His Own Write from a list of around twenty prospects,Template:Sfn the pick originally an idea of McCartney.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Among the rejected titles were In His Own Write and Draw,Template:Sfn The Transistor Negro, Left Hand Left Hand and Stop One and Buy Me.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn

Lennon signed a contract with Jonathan Cape for the book on 6 January 1964, receiving an advance of £1,000 (Template:Inflation).Template:Sfn He contributed 26 drawings and 31 pieces of writing, including 23 prose pieces and eight poems,Template:Sfn bringing the book's length to 80 pages.Template:Sfn Its pieces range in length from the eight-line poems "Good Dog Nigel" and "The Moldy Moldy Man" to the three-page story "Scene three Act one".Template:Sfn Lennon reported that his work on the book's illustrations was the most drawing he had done since leaving art school.Template:Sfn Most of the written content was new,Template:Sfn but some had been done previously, including the stories "On Safairy with Whide Hunter" (1958), "Henry and Harry" (1959), "Liddypool" (1961 as "Around And About"), "No Flies on Frank" (1962) and "Randolf's Party" (1962), and the poem "I Remember Arnold" (1958),[8] which he wrote following the death of his mother, Julia.Template:Sfn Lennon worked spontaneously and generally did not return to pieces after writing them, though he did revise "On Safairy with Whide Hunter" in mid-July 1962, adding a reference to the song "The Lion Sleeps Tonight", a hit in early 1962.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Among the book's literary references are "I Wandered", which includes several plays on the title of the poem "I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud" by English poet William Wordsworth;Template:Sfn "Treasure Ivan", which is a variation on the plot of Treasure Island by Robert Louis Stevenson;Template:Sfn and "At the Denis", which paraphrases a scene at a dentist's office from Carlo Barone's English-teaching book, A Manual of Conversation English-Italian.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn

<templatestyles src="Template:Quote_box/styles.css" />

It's about nothing. If you like it, you like it; if you don't, you don't. That's all there is to it. There's nothing deep in it, it's just meant to be funny. I put things down on sheets of paper and stuff them in my pocket. When I have enough, I have a book.Template:Sfn

– John Lennon on In His Own Write, 1964

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

In His Own Write was published in the UK on 23 March 1964,Template:Sfn retailing for 9s 6d (Template:Inflation).[9]Template:Sfn Lennon attended a launch party at Jonathan Cape's London offices the day before.Template:Sfn Maschler refused a request from his superiors at Jonathan Cape that the cover depict Lennon holding a guitar, instead opting for a simple head shot.Template:Sfn Photographer Robert Freeman designed the first edition of the book,Template:Sfn a black-and-white photograph he took of Lennon also adorning the cover.Template:Sfn The back cover includes a humorous autobiography of Lennon, "About the Awful", again written in his unorthodox style.Template:Sfn The book became an immediate best-seller,Template:Sfn selling out on its first day.Template:Sfn Only 25,000 copies of the first edition were printed, necessitating several reprints, including two in the last week of March 1964 and five more by January 1965.Template:Sfn In its first ten months, the book sold almost 200,000 copies,Template:Sfn eventually reaching around 300,000 copies bought in Britain.Template:Sfn Simon & Schuster published In His Own Write in the US on 27 April 1964,Template:Sfn retailing for US$2.50 (Template:Inflation).Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn The American edition was identical to the British, except that publishers added the caption "The Writing Beatle!" to the cover.Template:Sfn The book was a best-seller in the US,Template:Sfn where its publication took place around two months after the Beatles' first visit to the country and amid Beatlemania, the hysteria that surrounded the group.Template:Sfn

Contributions by the other Beatles

McCartney contributed an introduction to In His Own Write,Template:Sfn writing that its content was nonsensical yet funny.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn In 1964 interviews, Lennon said that two pieces were co-authored with McCartney.Template:Sfn Due to a publishing error only "On Safairy with Whide Hunter" was marked as such – being "[w]ritten in conjugal with Paul"[10] – the other piece remaining unidentified.Template:Sfn

Beatles drummer Ringo Starr, prone to incorrect wordings and malapropisms – dubbed "Ringoisms" by his bandmatesTemplate:Sfn – may have contributed a line to the book.Template:Sfn Finishing up after a long day, perhaps 19 March 1964,Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn he commented "it's been a hard day", and, on noticing it was dark, added Template:"'s night" ("it's been a hard day's night").Template:Sfn While both Lennon and Starr later identified the phrase as Starr's,[11] Lewisohn raises doubts that the phrase originated with him.Template:Sfn He writes that if the 19 March dating is correct, that places it after Lennon had already included it in the story "Sad Michael",Template:Sfn with the line "He'd had a hard days night that day".Template:Sfn By 19 March, copies of In His Own Write had already been printed.Template:Sfn Lewisohn suggests that Starr may have previously read or heard it in Lennon's story,Template:Sfn while journalist Nicholas Schaffner simply writes the phrase originated with Lennon's poem.Template:Sfn Beatles biographer Alan Clayson suggests the phrase's inspiration was Eartha Kitt's 1963 song "I Had a Hard Day Last Night", the B-side of her single "Lola Lola".[12] After director Dick Lester suggested A Hard Day's Night as the title of the Beatles' 1964 film,[13] Lennon used it again in the song of the same name.Template:Sfn

Reception

James Joyce
Irish writer James Joyce in 1922. Though Lennon was unfamiliar with his work, critics compared the book to Joyce's later writings.

In His Own Write received critical acclaim,Template:Sfn with favourable reviews in London's The Sunday Times and The Observer.Template:Sfn Among the most popular poems in the collection are "No Flies on Frank", "Good Dog Nigel", "The Wrestling Dog", "I Sat Belonely" and "Deaf Ted, Danoota, (and me)".Template:Sfn The Times Literary SupplementTemplate:'s reviewer wrote that the book "is worth the attention of anyone who fears for the impoverishment of the English language and British imagination".[14] In The New York Times, Harry Gilroy admired the writing style, describing it as "like a Beatle possessed",Template:Sfn while George Melly for The Sunday Times wrote: "It is fascinating of course to climb inside a Beatle's head to see what's going on there, but what really counts is that what's going on there really is fascinating."[15] The Virginia Quarterly Review called the book "a true delight" that finally gave "those intellectuals who have become stuck with BeatlemaniaTemplate:Nbsp... a serious literary excuse for their visceral pleasures".[16] Gloria Steinem opined in a December 1964 profile of Lennon for Cosmopolitan that the book showed him to be the only one of the band who had "signs of a talent outside the hothouse world of musical fadism and teenage worship".[17]

Though Lennon had never read him, comparisons to Irish writer James Joyce were common.Template:Sfn In his review of the book, author Tom Wolfe mentions Spike Milligan as an influence, but writes that the "imitations of Joyce" were what "most intrigued the literati" in America and England: "the mimicry of prayers, liturgies, manuals and grammars, the mad homonyms, especially biting ones such as 'Loud' for 'Lord', which both [Joyce and Lennon] use".[18] In a favourable review for The Nation, Peter Schickele drew comparison to Edward Lear, Carroll, Thurber and Joyce, adding that even those "with a predisposition toward the Beatles" will be "pleasantly shocked" when reading it.[19] Time cited the same influences before admiring the book's typography, written "as if pages had been set by a drunken linotypist".[20] Newsweek called Lennon "an heir to the Anglo-American tradition of nonsense", but found that the constant Carroll and Joyce comparisons were faulty, emphasising instead Lennon's uniqueness and "Template:Em spontaneity".[21] Bill Harry published a review in the 26 March 1964 issue of Mersey Beat, written as a parody of Lennon's style.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn In an accompanying "translation" of his review, he predicted that while it would "[a]lmost certaintlyTemplate:Nbsp... be a best seller", it could lend itself to controversy, with newer Beatles fans likely to be "puzzled by its way-out, off beat and sometimes sick humour".[9]

One of the few negative responses to the book came from the Conservative Member of Parliament Charles Curran.Template:Sfn On 19 June 1964, during a House of Commons debate on automation,Template:Sfn he quoted the poem "Deaf Ted, Danoota, (and me)", then spoke derisively about the book, arguing that Lennon's verse was a symptom of a poor education system.Template:Sfn He suggested that Lennon was "in a pathetic state of near-literacy", adding that "[h]e seems to have picked up bits of Tennyson, Browning, and Robert Louis Stevenson while listening with one ear to the football results on the wireless."Template:SfnTemplate:Refn The most unfavourable review of the book came from critic Christopher Ricks,Template:Sfn who wrote in New Statesman that anyone unaware of the Beatles would be unlikely to draw pleasure from the book.[22]

Reactions of Lennon and the Beatles

<templatestyles src="Template:Quote_box/styles.css" />

I really didn't think the book would even get reviewed by the book reviewersTemplate:Nbsp... I didn't think people would accept the book like they did. To tell you the truth they took the book more seriously than I did myself. It just began as a laugh for me.Template:Sfn

– John Lennon, 1964

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

While the success of In His Own Write pleased Lennon,Template:Sfn he was surprised by both the attention it received and its positive reception.Template:Sfn In a 1965 interview, he admitted to purchasing all the books that critics compared to his, including one by Lear, one by Geoffrey Chaucer and Finnegans Wake by Joyce. He further stated that he did not see the similarities, except "[perhaps] a little bit of Finnegans WakeTemplate:Nbsp... but anybody who changes words is going to be compared".Template:Sfn In a 1968 interview, he said that reading Finnegans Wake "was great, and I dug it and felt as though [Joyce] was an old friend", though he found the book difficult to read in its entirety.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn

Among Lennon's bandmates, Starr did not read the book, but Harrison and McCartney enjoyed it.Template:Sfn Harrison stated in February 1964 that the book included "some great [gags]",Template:Sfn and Lennon recalled McCartney was especially fond of the book, being "dead keen" about it.Template:Sfn In Beatles manager Brian Epstein's 1964 autobiography A Cellarful of Noise, he commented: "I was deeply gratified that a Beatle could detach himself Template:Em from Beatleism and create such impact as an author".[23]Template:Refn Beatles producer George Martin – a fan of The Goon ShowTemplate:Sfn – and his wife Judy Lockhart-Smith similarly enjoyed Lennon's writings, with Martin calling them "terribly funny".Template:SfnTemplate:Refn In an August 1964 interview, Lennon identified "Scene three Act one" as his favourite piece in the book.Template:Sfn

Foyle's Literary Luncheon

Following the book's publication, Christina Foyle, the founder of Foyles bookshop,Template:Sfn honoured Lennon at one of Foyle's Literary Luncheons.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Osbert Lancaster chaired the event on 23 April 1964 at the Dorchester hotel in London.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Among around six hundred attendees were several eminent guests, including Helen Shapiro, Yehudi Menuhin and Wilfrid Brambell.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Hungover from a night spent at the Ad Lib Club,Template:Sfn Lennon admitted to a journalist at the event that he was "scared stiff".Template:Sfn He was reluctant to perform the expected speech, getting Epstein to advise luncheon organisers Foyle and Ben Perrick the day before the event that he would not be speaking. The two were taken aback, but assumed that Lennon meant he would only provide a short speech.Template:Sfn

At the event, after Lancaster introduced him,Template:Sfn Lennon stood and only said: "Uh, thank you very much, and God bless you. You've got a lucky face."Template:Sfn Foyle was irritated,Template:Sfn while Perrick recalls there was "some slight feeling of bewilderment" among attendees.Template:Sfn Epstein gave a speech to avoid further disappointing any diners that had hoped to hear from Lennon.Template:Sfn In A Cellarful of Noise, Epstein expressed of Lennon's lack of a speech: "He was not prepared to do something which was not only unnatural to him, but also something he might have done badly. He was not going to fail."[24] Perrick reflects that Lennon retained the affection of his audience due to his "charm and charisma", with attendees still happily queuing afterwards for signed copies.Template:Sfn

Analysis

Against Lennon's songwriting

<templatestyles src="Template:Quote_box/styles.css" />

You just stick a few images together, thread them together, and you call it poetry. But I was just using the mind that wrote In His Own Write to write that song.[25]

– John Lennon reflecting on writing "I Am the Walrus", 1980

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Later commentators have discussed the book's prose in relation to Lennon's songwriting, both in how it differed from his contemporary writing and in how it anticipates his later work.[26] Writer Chris Ingham describes the book as "surreal poetry",Template:Sfn displaying "a darkness and biteTemplate:Nbsp... that was light years away from 'I Want to Hold Your HandTemplate:'".Template:Sfn Professor of English Ian Marshall describes Lennon's prose as "mad wordplay", noting the Lewis Carroll influence and suggesting it anticipates the lyrics of later songs like "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds" and "I Am the Walrus".Template:Sfn Critic Tim Riley compares the short story "Unhappy Frank" to "I Am the Walrus", though he calls the former "a good deal more oblique and less cunning".Template:Sfn

Walter Everett describes the book as including "Joycean dialect substitutions, Carrollian portmanteau words, and rich-sounding stream-of-consciousness double-entendre".Template:Sfn Unlike Carroll, Lennon generally did not create new words in his writing, but instead used homonyms (such as grate for great) and other phonological and morphological distortions (such as peoble for people).Template:Sfn Both Everett and Beatles researcher Kevin Howlett discuss the influence of Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass on both of Lennon's books and on the lyrics for "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds".[27] Everett singles out the poems "Deaf Ted, Danoota, (and me)" and "I Wandered" as examples of this influence,Template:Sfn quoting an excerpt from "I Wandered" to illustrate this:[28]

Past grisby trees and hulky builds
Past ratters and bradder sheep
...
Down hovey lanes and stoney claves
Down ricketts and stickly myth
In a fatty hebrew gurth
I wandered humply as a sock
To meet bad Bernie Smith

In his book Can't Buy Me Love, Jonathan Gould compares the poem "No Flies on Frank" to Lennon's 1967 song "Good Morning Good Morning", seeing both as illustrating the "dispirited domestic milieu" of "protagonists [who] drag themselves through the day 'crestfalled and defectiveTemplate:'".Template:Sfn Everett suggests that while the character Bungalow Bill in Lennon's 1968 song "The Continuing Story of Bungalow Bill" is generally understood to be a portmanteau of Jungle Jim and Buffalo Bill, the name also could have its origins in the character Jumble Jim from Lennon and McCartney's short story "On Safairy with Whide Hunter".Template:Sfn

On 23 March 1964 – the same day the book was published in the UK – Lennon went to Lime Grove Studios, West London, to film a segment promoting it. The BBC programme Tonight broadcast the segment live, with presenters Cliff Michelmore, Derek Hart and Kenneth Allsop reading excerpts.Template:Sfn A four-minute interview between Allsop and Lennon followed,Template:Sfn with Allsop challenging him to try using similar wordplay and imagination in his songwriting.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Similar questions about the banality of his song lyrics – including from musician Bob DylanTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn – became common following the publication of his book,Template:Sfn pushing him to write deeper, more introspective songs in the years that followed.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn In a December 1970 interview with Jann Wenner of Rolling Stone, Lennon explained that early in his career he made a conscious split between writing pop music for public consumption and the expressive writing found in In His Own Write, with the latter representing "the personal storiesTemplate:Nbsp... expressive of my personal emotions".[29] In his 1980 Playboy interview, he recalled the Allsop interview as being the impetus for his writing "In My Life".[30] Writer John C. Winn mentions songs like "I'm a Loser", "You've Got to Hide Your Love Away" and "Help!" as exemplifying Lennon's move to deeper writing in the year after the book.Template:Sfn Music scholar Terence O'Grady describes the "surprising twists" of Lennon's 1965 song "Norwegian Wood (This Bird Has Flown)" as more similar to In His Own Write than his earlier songs,Template:Sfn and Sauceda mentions several of Lennon's later Beatles songs – including "I Am the Walrus", "What's the New Mary Jane", "Come Together", "Dig a Pony" – as demonstrating his ability for "sound-sense writing", where words are assembled not for their meaning but instead for their rhythm and for "the joy of sound".Template:Sfn

James Sauceda and Finnegans Wake

Sauceda produced the only comprehensive study of Lennon's writings in his 1983 book Literary Lennon: A Comedy of Letters,Template:Sfn providing a postmodern dissection of both In His Own Write and Lennon's next book of nonsense literature, A Spaniard in the Works.Template:Sfn Everett describes the book as "a thorough but sometimes wrongheaded postmodern Finnegans Wake-inspired parsing".Template:Sfn Sauceda, for example, casts doubt on Lennon's claim that he had never read Joyce before writing In His Own Write.Template:Sfn He suggests that the lines "he was debb and duff and could not speeg"[31] and "Practice daily but not if you are Mutt and Jeff"[32] from the pieces "Sad Michael" and "All Abord Speeching", respectively, were influenced by a passage from Finnegans Wake discussing whether someone is deaf or deaf-mute, reading:[33]<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

Jute. – Are you jeff?
Mutt. – Somehards.
Jute. – But are you not jeffmute?
Mutt. – Noho. Only an utterer.
Jute. – Whoa? Whoat is the mutter with you?

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". Author Peter Doggett is even more dismissive of Sauceda than Everett, criticising Sauceda for missing references to British popular culture.Template:Sfn In particular, he mentions the analysis of the story "The Famous Five Through Woenow Abbey", wherein Sauceda concludes that the Famous Five of the story refers to Epstein and the Beatles,[34] but does not mention the popular British children's novels The Famous Five, written by Enid BlytonTemplate:Sfn – referred to as "Enig Blyter" in Lennon's story.[35] Riley calls Sauceda's insights "keen", but suggests more can be understood by analysing the works with reference to Lennon's biography.Template:Sfn Gould comments that The Goon Show was Lennon's closest experience to the style of Finnegans Wake, and describes Milligan's 1959 book Silly Verse for Kids as "the direct antecedent to In His Own Write."Template:Sfn

Against Lennon's biography

<templatestyles src="Template:Quote_box/styles.css" />

I used to hide my real emotions in gobbledegook, like In His Own Write. When I wrote teenage poems, I wrote in gobbledegook because I was always hiding my real emotions from [my aunt] Mimi [Smith].Template:Sfn

– John Lennon, 1971

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Before he signed with Jonathan Cape, Lennon wrote prose and poetry to keep for himself and share with his friends, leaving his pieces filled with private meanings and in-jokes.Template:Sfn Quoted in a February 1964 piece in Mersey Beat, Harrison said with regard to the book that "[t]he 'with-it' people will get the gags and there are some great ones".Template:Sfn Lewisohn states that Lennon based the story "Henry and Harry" on an experience of Harrison, whose father gifted him electrician's tools for Christmas 1959, implying he expected his son to become an electrician despite Harrison's disagreement.Template:Sfn In the story, Lennon writes that such jobs were "brummer striving", explaining in a 1968 television interview that the term referred to "all those jobs that people have that they don't want. And there's probably about 90 percent brummer strivers watching in at the moment."Template:Sfn The 1962 story "Randolf's Party" was never discussed by Lennon, but Lewisohn suggests he most likely wrote it about former Beatles drummer Pete Best. Lewisohn mentions similarities between Best and the lead character, including an absent father figure and Best's first name being Randolph.Template:Sfn Best biographer Mallory Curley describes the lines "We never liked you all the years we've known you. You were never raelly [sic] one of us you know, soft head" as, "the crux of Pete's Beatles career, in one paragraph."[36]

Riley opines that the short story "Unhappy Frank" can be read as Lennon's "screed against 'motherTemplate:'", aimed at both his aunt Mimi and late-mother Julia for their over-protectiveness and absence, respectively.Template:Sfn The poem "Good Dog Nigel" tells the story of a happy dog that is put down. Riley suggests it was inspired by Mimi putting down Lennon's dog, Sally, and that the dog in the poem shares its name with Lennon's childhood friend Nigel Walley, a witness to Julia's death.Template:Sfn Prone to hitting his girlfriends as a teenager,Template:Sfn Lennon also included several domestic violence allusions in the book, such as "No Flies on Frank", where a man beats his wife to death and then tries to deliver the corpse to his mother-in-law.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn In his book The Lives of John Lennon, author Albert Goldman interprets the story as relating to Lennon's feelings about his wife Cynthia and Mimi.Template:Sfn

Sauceda and Ingham comment that the book includes several references to "cripples", Lennon having had developed phobias of physical and mental disabilities as a child.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Thelma Pickles, Lennon's girlfriend in the autumn of 1958,Template:Sfn later recalled he would joke with disabled people he encountered in public, including "[accosting] men in wheelchairs and [jeering], 'How did you lose your legs? Chasing the wife?Template:'"Template:Sfn In an interview with Hunter Davies for The Beatles: The Authorised Biography, Lennon admitted that he "did have a cruel humor", suggesting it was a way of hiding his emotions. He concluded: "I would never hurt a cripple. It was just part of our jokes, our way of life."Template:Sfn During the Beatles' tours, people with physical handicaps were often brought to meet the band, with some parents hoping that their child being touched by a Beatle would heal them.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn In his 1970 interview with Rolling Stone, Lennon remembered, "[w]e were just surrounded by cripples and blind people all the time and when we would go through corridors they would be all touching us. It got like that, it was horrifying".[37] Sauceda suggests that these strange recent experiences led to Lennon to incorporating them into his stories.Template:Sfn For Doggett, the essential qualities of Lennon's writing are "cruelty, [a] matter-of-fact attitude to death and destruction, and [a] quick descent from bathos into gibberish".Template:Sfn

Anti-authority and the Beat movement

<templatestyles src="Template:Quote_box/styles.css" />

One of the reviews of In His Own Write tried to put me in this satire boom with Peter Cook and those people that came out of [the University of] Cambridge, saying, "Well, he's just satirising the normal things, like the Church and the State," which is what I did. Those Template:Em the things that keep you satirising, because they're the Template:Em things.[38]

– John Lennon, 1970

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

In His Own Write includes elements of anti-authority sentiment,Template:Sfn disparaging both politics and Christianity, with Lennon recalling that the book was "pretty heavy on the church" with "many knocks at religion" and includes a scene depicting a dispute between a worker and a capitalist.Template:Sfn Riley suggests that contemporary reviewers were overtaken by the book's "loopy, scabrous energy", overlooking the "subversion [which] lay embedded in its cryptic asides".Template:Sfn The story "A letter", for example, references Christine Keeler and the Profumo affair, featuring a drawing of her and the closing line,Template:Sfn "We hope this fires you as you keeler."Template:Sfn

Lennon and his best friend in art college, Stu Sutcliffe,Template:Sfn often discussed writers like Henry Miller, Jack Kerouac and other Beat poets, such as Gregory Corso and Lawrence Ferlinghetti.Template:Sfn Lennon, Sutcliffe and Harry sometimes interacted with the local British beat scene,[39] and, in June 1960, the Beatles – then known as the Silver BeetlesTemplate:Sfn – provided musical backing for the beat poet Royston Ellis during a poetry reading at the Jacaranda coffee bar in Liverpool.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn While Lennon suggested in a 1965 interview that if he had not been a Beatle he "might have been a Beat Poet",Template:Sfn author Greg Herriges declares that In His Own WriteTemplate:'s irreverent attacks on the mainstream ranked Lennon among the best of his predecessors in the Beat Generation.Template:Sfn Journalist Simon Warner disagrees, positing that Lennon's writing style owed little to the Beat movement, being instead largely derived from the nonsense tradition of the late nineteenth century.Template:Sfn

Illustrations

Seventeen distorted figures stand together, including a dog and several faces on balloons.
The illustration accompanying the piece "Randolf's Party", extending onto another page.

The illustrations of In His Own Write have received comparatively little attention.Template:Sfn Doggett writes that the book's drawings are similar to the "shapeless figures" of Thurber, but with Lennon's unique touch.Template:Sfn He interprets much of the art as displaying the same fascination with cripples apparent in the text, joining faces to "unwieldy, joke-animal bodies" alongside figures "distorted almost beyond humanity".Template:Sfn Journalist Scott Gutterman describes the characters as "strange, protoplasmic creatures",Template:Sfn and "lumpen everyman and everywoman figures" joined by animals, "[gamboling] around an empty landscape, engaged in obscure pursuits".Template:Sfn

Analysing the illustration accompanying the piece "Randolf's Party", Gutterman describes the group as "gossiping, frowning, and bunching together", but while some figures adhere to regular social conventions, some fly away out of the image.Template:Sfn Doggett interprets the same drawing as including "Neanderthal men", some merely faces attached to balloons, while others "[boast] Cubist profiles with one eye hovering just outside their faces".Template:Sfn Sauceda suggests the figures of the drawing reappear in the Beatles' 1968 animated film, Yellow Submarine, and describes the "balloon heads" as a metaphor for people's "empty-headedness".Template:Sfn Doggett and Sauceda each identify self-portraits among Lennon's drawings, including one of a Lennon-like figure flying through the air, which Doggett determines to be one of the book's best illustrations.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Doggett interprets it as evoking Lennon's "wish-fulfillment dreams",Template:Sfn while Sauceda and Gutterman each see the drawing as representing the freedom Lennon felt in making his art.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn

Legacy

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Cultural commentators of the 1960s often focused on Lennon as the leading artistic and literary figure in the Beatles.Template:Sfn In her study of Beatles historiography, historian Erin Torkelson Weber suggests that the publication of In His Own Write reinforced these perceptions, with many viewing Lennon as "the smart one" of the group, and that the band's first film, A Hard Day's Night, further emphasised that view.Template:Sfn Everett arrives at similar conclusions, writing that, however unfairly, Lennon was often described as more artistically adventurous than McCartney in part because of the publication of his two books.Template:Sfn Communications professor Michael R. Frontani states that the book served to further distinguish Lennon's image within the Beatles,Template:Sfn while Independent writer Andy Gill felt that it and A Spaniard in the Works revealed Lennon to be "the sharpest Beatle, a man of acid wit".Template:Sfn

Bob Dylan
American musician Bob Dylan in 1963. Inspired by In His Own Write, he began writing his first collection of poetry in 1965, published in 1971 as Tarantula.

Beatles writer Kenneth Womack suggests that, paired with the Beatles' debut film, the book challenged the band's "non-believers", made up of those outside their then largely teenage fanbase,Template:Sfn a contention with which philosophy professor Bernard Gendron agrees, writing that the two pieces of media initiated "a major reversal of the public assessment of the Beatles' aesthetic worth."Template:Sfn Doggett groups the book with the Beatles' more general move from the "classic working-class pop milieu" towards "an arty middle-class environment". He argues that the band's invitation into the British establishment – such as their interactions with photographer Robert Freeman, director Dick Lester and publisher Tom Maschler, among others – was unique for pop musicians of the time and threatened to erode elements of the British class system.Template:Sfn Prince Philip of the British royal family read the book and said he enjoyed it thoroughly,Template:Sfn while Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau described Lennon in 1969 as "a pretty good poet".[40] The book resulted in numerous businesses and charities requesting that Lennon produce illustrations.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn In 2014, the broker Sotheby's auctioned over one hundred of Lennon's manuscripts for In His Own Write and A Spaniard in the Works from Maschler's collection. The short stories, poems and line drawings sold for US$2.9 million (US$Template:Inflation million adjusted for inflation), more than double their pre-sale estimate.Template:Sfn

Lennon issuing a book of poetry before Bob Dylan subverted expectations in Britain, where Lennon was still seen as a simple pop star and Dylan was lauded as a poet.Template:Sfn Inspired by In His Own Write, Dylan began his first book of poetry in 1965, later published in 1971 as Tarantula.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Using similar wordplay, though with fewer puns, Dylan described it contemporaneously as "a John Lennon-type book".Template:Sfn Dylan biographer Clinton Heylin suggests that Lennon's piece "A Letter" is the most overt example of In His Own WriteTemplate:'s influence on Tarantula, with several similar satirical letters appearing in Dylan's collection.Template:Sfn Three volumes of Dylan's personal writings were later booklegged under the title In His Own Write: Personal Sketches, released in 1980, 1990 and 1992.Template:Sfn Beyond influencing Dylan, the book also inspired Michael Maslin, a cartoonist for The New Yorker magazine. A fellow Thurber enthusiast, he identified it, particularly the piece "The Fat Growth of Eric Hearble", as his introduction to "crazy wacky humor".Template:Sfn

Other versions

Script error: No such module "anchor". The Penguin John Lennon

File:The Penguin John Lennon.jpg
Cover of The Penguin John Lennon (1966), designed by Alan Aldridge and photographed by Brian Duffy.

In 1965, Lennon published a second book of nonsense literature, A Spaniard in the Works, expanding on the wordplay and parody of In His Own Write.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn While it was a best-seller,Template:Sfn reviewers were generally unenthusiastic, considering it similar to his first book yet without the benefit of being unexpected.Template:Sfn He began a third book, planned for release in February 1966, but abandoned it soon after,Template:Sfn leaving the two books the only ones published in his lifetime.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn

In what Doggett terms "an admission that his literary career was at an end", Lennon consented to both of his books being joined into a single paperback.Template:Sfn On 27 October 1966, Penguin Books published The Penguin John Lennon.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn The first edition to join both of his books into one volume,Template:Sfn the publishers altered the proportions of several illustrations in the process.Template:Sfn The art director of Penguin Books, Alan Aldridge, initially conceived that the cover would consist of a painting depicting Lennon as a penguin, but the publishing director rejected the idea as disrespectful to the company.Template:Sfn Aldridge commissioned British photographer Brian Duffy to take a cover photo with Lennon posing next to a birdcage.Template:Sfn On the day of photoshoot, Aldridge changed his mind and instead had Lennon dress as the comic book character Superman, with the imagery meant to suggest he had now conquered music, film and literature. DC Comics, the owners of the Superman franchise, claimed the image infringed on their copyright, so Aldridge retouched the photo, replacing the S on the costume's shield with Lennon's initials.Template:Sfn At least two more covers were used in the next four years; one shows Lennon wearing several pairs of glasses, while the 1969 edition shows a portrait of Lennon with long hair and a beard.Template:Sfn

Translations

In His Own Write has been translated into several different languages.Template:Sfn Authors Christiane Rochefort and Rachel Mizraki translated the book into French,Template:Sfn published in 1965 as Script error: No such module "Lang".Template:Sfn with a new humorous preface titled "Script error: No such module "Lang". [sic] Script error: No such module "Lang".".Template:Sfn Scholar Margaret-Anne Hutton suggests that the book's irreverence, black humour and anti-establishment stance pairs well with Rochefort's style and that its wordplay anticipates that of her 1966 book, Script error: No such module "Lang"..Template:Sfn The book was translated into Finnish by the translator responsible for adapting the works of Joyce.Template:Sfn

Author Robert Gernhardt attempted to convince Arno Schmidt – who later worked on Joyce translations – to translate In His Own Write into German, but Schmidt rejected the offer.Template:Sfn Instead, publisher Template:Ill and Wolf Dieter Rogosky each translated some parts of the work,Template:Sfn publishing a bilingual German/English version, Script error: No such module "Lang"., in 1965.Template:Sfn Author Template:Ill published a new edition in 2010,Template:Sfn updating several cultural references in the process.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Argentine author Jaime Rest translated the book into Spanish in the 1960s as Script error: No such module "Lang".,Template:Sfn using a Buenos Aires urban-dialect.Template:Sfn Andy Ehrenhaus published a bilingual Spanish/English edition of both In His Own Write and A Spaniard in the Works in 2009,Template:Sfn with his strategy of imagining Lennon as writing in Spanish described by one commentator as "lunatically effective".Template:Sfn

Adaptations

Script error: No such module "anchor". The Lennon Play: In His Own Write

Writing (1966–1968)

When Lennon began writing A Spaniard in the Works, he considered making a spoken-word LP with extracts from In His Own Write but ultimately decided against it.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn In 1966, Theodore Mann, the artistic director of New York City's Circle in the Square, commissioned American playwright Adrienne Kennedy to write a new play. Kennedy came up with the idea of adapting Lennon's two books for the stage, flying to London to discuss the idea with Jonathan Cape.Template:Sfn Around the end of 1967, actor Victor Spinetti began working with Kennedy to adapt the two books into a one-act play.[41] Spinetti had acted in the Beatles' films A Hard Day's Night, Help! and Magical Mystery Tour,Template:Sfn and became good friends with Lennon.Template:Sfn Originally titled Scene Three, Act One after one of In His Own WriteTemplate:'s stories and staged under that name in late-1967, the play's title was changed to The Lennon Play: In His Own Write.[42] The play joins elements of the books together to tell the story of an imaginative boy growing up,Template:Sfn escaping from the mundane world through his daydreaming.Template:Sfn Lennon sent notes and additions for the play to Spinetti,Template:Sfn and held final approval on Spinetti and Kennedy's script.Template:Sfn Kennedy was let go from the project before it was finished.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn

Victor Spinetti
Actor Victor Spinetti in December 1967. He adapted Lennon's books into a one-act play with Adrienne Kennedy, then directed a production of it in June 1968.

On 3 October 1967, the National Theatre Company in London announced that they would be staging an adaption of Lennon's two books.Template:Sfn The next month, on 24 November, Lennon compiled effects tapes at EMI Recording Studios for use in the production. Returning on 28 November for a Beatles recording session, he recorded speech and sound effects, working past midnight from 2:45 am to 4:30 am.Template:Sfn Spinetti attended the session to assist Lennon in preparing the tapes.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Sir Laurence Olivier produced the show, while Spinetti directed.[43] Riley writes Adrian Mitchell collaborated on the production but does not specify in what capacity.Template:Sfn In the spring of 1968, Spinetti and Lennon discussed ways the show could be performed, and in the summer Lennon attended several rehearsals of the show between sessions for the Beatles' eponymous album,Template:Sfn also known as "the White album".Template:Sfn In a June 1968 interview, he stated that "[w]hen I saw the rehearsal, I felt quite emotionalTemplate:Nbsp... I was too involved with it when it was writtenTemplate:Nbsp... it took something like this to make me see what I was about then".Template:Sfn A little over a week before its opening, Lennon recorded twelve more tape loops and sound effects for use in the play, copying them and taking the tape at the end of the session.Template:Sfn

Premiere (June 1968)

The play opened at The Old Vic theatre in London on 18 June 1968,Template:Sfn and Simon & Schuster published it the same year.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn It was heavily censored due to lines perceived as blasphemous and disrespectful to world leaders,[44] including a speech from the Queen titled "my housebound and eyeball".Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Lennon was enthusiastic about it;Template:Sfn Spinetti later recalled Lennon excitedly running up to him after the first night's performance, expressing that the play reminded him of his early enthusiasm for writing.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Reception to the play however was mixed.Template:Sfn Reviewing it for The New York Times, critic Martin Esslin described it as "ingenious and skillful, but ultimately less than satisfying" due to the lack of any underlying meaning.Template:Sfn Sauceda retrospectively dismisses the play as a weak adaption that struggles to generate "thematic momentum".Template:Sfn He criticises "Template:Em awkward and pointless attempts to ape Lennon's style" by Spinetti and Kennedy that "[infringe] on the integrity of John Lennon's work".Template:Sfn For example, he writes that they changed Lennon's pun "Prevelant ze Gaute"[45] – a play on French leader Charles de Gaulle – to "Pregnant De Gaulle".Template:SfnTemplate:Refn

Though they were both still married to other people, Yoko Ono joined Lennon at the opening performance in one of their first appearances in public together.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Some journalists challenged the couple, shouting "Where's your wife?" at Lennon, in reference to Cynthia.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Cynthia, then holidaying in Italy with her family and her and Lennon's son, Julian, saw photos of the couple attending the premiere in an Italian newspaper.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn In an interview with Ray Coleman, she recalled, "I knew when I saw the picture that that was Template:Em", concluding that Lennon would only have brought Ono out in public if he was prepared for a divorce.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn The ensuing controversy over Lennon and Ono's appearance drew press attention away from the play.Template:Sfn Everett writes the couple were "lambasted in very hurtful ways by the press, often from an openly racist perspective".Template:Sfn Ono biographer Jerry Hopkins suggests the couple's first experiment with heroin in July 1968 was in part due to the pain they experienced from their treatment by the press,[46] an opinion Beatles writer Joe Goodden shares, though he writes that they first used the drug together in May 1968.Template:Sfn

Other adaptations

Lennon briefly considered adapting his two books into a film,Template:Sfn announcing at a 14 May 1968 press conference that Apple Corps would be producing it within the year.Template:Sfn Besides The Lennon Play, playwright Jonathan Glew directed the book's only other adaption in 2015 after acquiring permission from Lennon's widow, Ono.Template:Sfn Staged at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe,Template:Sfn the production consisted of a dramatic reading of all of the book's pieces.Template:Sfn

Notes

Template:Notelist

References

Citations

Template:Reflist

Sources

Books

Template:Refbegin

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Template:Refend

Book chapters

Template:Refbegin

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Template:Refend

Journal, newspaper and magazine articles

Template:Refbegin

Template:Refend

External links

Template:Navbox musical artist

  1. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  2. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: establishment figures, surreal humour; Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: admired, punning wordplay; Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: "the only proofTemplate:Nbsp..."
  3. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  4. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  5. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: Alice in Wonderland and The Goon Show; Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: Thurber.
  6. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: Began following during autumn tour; Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: Love Me Do: The Beatles' Progress.
  7. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: "An awful lot of the material was written while we were on tour, most of it when we were in Margate"; Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: Margate residency from 8 to 13 July 1963.
  8. Script error: No such module "Footnotes". and Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: previously written, with years; Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: included in In His Own Write.
  9. a b Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  10. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  11. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: Starr; Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: Lennon.
  12. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  13. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  14. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  15. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  16. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  17. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  18. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  19. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  20. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  21. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  22. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  23. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  24. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  25. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  26. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: difference from contemporary writing; Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: anticipation of later songwriting.
  27. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".; Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  28. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  29. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  30. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  31. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  32. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  33. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  34. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  35. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  36. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  37. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  38. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  39. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  40. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  41. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: late 1967, Kennedy and Spinetti; Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: one-act play.
  42. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: changed names; Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: late-1967 staging before changing names; Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: "Scene three, Act one" a piece in In His Own Write.
  43. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: Olivier produced; Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: Spinetti directed.
  44. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  45. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  46. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..