Wiki143:Articles for deletion/List of Bermuda Triangle incidents

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep. SynergeticMaggot 05:08, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

List of Bermuda Triangle incidents

This is neither a list of incidents nor even a list of links to them. It's mostly a collection of links to various dates and various types of craft. Crabapplecove 02:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

• Keep This may need to be re-written (a little) but does appear to be an important list. -- Librarianofages 02:46, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep Just becuase an article is in need of improvment, does not mean we need to delete it. I would suggest putting {{cleanup-list}} at the top of this. —— Eagle (ask me for help) 03:10, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Strong keep. Just needs cleanup. Penelope D 03:54, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Slap a cleanup tag on it, it looks like a worthy topic for an article. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 07:53, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Needs some cleanup JeffMurph 08:22, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep if we deleted every article that needed a cleanup ...well WilyD 13:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep It's maintainable, a category wouldn't do (some of the incidents don't have sufficient information to write about on their own), and there's enough information and sources available to make this work well. Captainktainer * Talk 17:57, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep of course. Deleting articles is reserved for cases in which the topic is not appropriate for a Wikipedia article. The topic and list is most definitely appropriate, and while it could use cleanup, there is nothing wrong with the article per se. Dark Shikari 17:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - re-write to make it an important list. --Bigtop (tk|cb|em|ea) 21:09, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep This is important. Creating a harder than deleting 21:28, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. I don't see how proper cleanup and citing of sources is possible, and given the length of the list, I doubt anyone is going to try to verify and source all these claims anytime soon. The topic is not appropriate because "incident" is too vague and subjective a term. What is an "incident" as far as this article is concerned? Crabapplecove 04:49, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• keep this please the topic is appropriate for wikipedia Yuckfoo 13:53, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.