Wiki143:Requests for checkuser/Case/Axiomm

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wiki143:Requests for checkuser/Case/Axiomm}} to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

• Template:Checkuser
• Template:Checkuser
• EddieSegoura accounts

Axiomm and Reggae Sanderz both appear by editing style to be EddieSegoura. They may currently be engaged in sockpuppetry (along with AOL ips) at Wikipedia:Deletion review#2006 Boston Massacre. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 15:37, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Axiomm has also been implicated in RfA irregularities (not unusual for EddieSegoura socks), including the incidents mentioned in the original Axiomm RFCU (below, in non-transluded views) and here. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 16:06, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Template:Respond Mackensen (talk) 22:49, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for looking. Back to the old-fashioned detective work. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 02:06, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wiki143:Requests for checkuser/Case/Axiomm}} to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

There is something very strange about . His/her fourth edit was a vote on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Christopherlin, his third edit created Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Yahooligans which seems to be nonsense without content or context, and his other edits are creation or recreation of nonsense content articles like Humbierto. Maybe a sock for a prevously banned troublemaker? Thatcher131 12:27, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

I don't see any specific policy violation concerns here; did you have a specific banned editor in mind? Jayjg ^(talk) 23:15, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.