Wiki143:Articles for deletion/Pokémon damage formula

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Kusma (討論) 04:02, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Pokémon damage formula

Appears to be original research. Formula was updated and managed by one person. I asked him for a source or if this was original research. Individual hasn't been active in almost a month. Crossmr 17:19, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete WP:FICT Minor component of fictional work. (i.e. fancruft). --John Nagle 17:25, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge any useful info into Pokémon and Delete--SomeStranger^(t|c) 17:33, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

  as I said, this appears to be based on original research, I'm not sure there is any useful information here. I'm certainly not a pokemon subject matter expert. --Crossmr 17:59, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

• Merge per SomeStranger if someone can verify the info. Gotta catch 'em all! --Starionwolf 19:37, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as original research, no merge. Anybody wishing to merge should do so before the AfD is closed. Erik the Rude 21:46, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as severe Pokecruft. I'm not sure how OR it is, but it's definitely something the average Pokemon player doesn't need to know to play. -- Grev 05:58, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• alt.pokemon.cruft.die.die.die -- GWO
• Delete- arguably unimportant, probably OR, definitely fancruft. Reyk _YO! 20:21, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki to Wikiknowledge and Delete. In think this should be fine if we do that, the article is merely facts and thus is not elegible for copyright.--Ac1983fan (talk • contribs) 21:38, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 03:01, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 03:01, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This isn't original research (I could source it, were I so inclined), but it is horribly unencyclopedic game-guide content. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 20:51, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not a game guide. GassyGuy 15:35, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.