Wiki143:Articles for deletion/WAEC (AM)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy keep. Aaron 07:36, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

WAEC (AM)

(from Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/WAEC (AM)) Delete. Nonsense. 66.32.249.17 01:35, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• Comment: Came across this article on Wikipedia:Neglected articles; it looks like it was never closed out. Restarting the AFD process to get both pages closed. Based on the content of the existing page, it looks as though this was a bad-faith nomination to get an article deleted for the sake of vandalism.--み使い Mitsukai 04:42, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For the record, my vote is Speedy keep due to bad-faith nomination. If this is kept and closed out, the above VFD page will have to be closed and archived as well.--み使い Mitsukai 04:42, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep, no plausible cause for deletion offered. — Adrian~enwiki (talk) 05:11, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep I think its notable, its a radio station. Bad faith nom, especially since the nom says its nonsense, the article did not read as nonsense at all. Mike _{(T C)} File:Star of life2.svg 05:52, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Anons aren't supposed to nominate articles for deletion anyway. I'm closing this. --Aaron 07:34, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

• I wanted to clarify that anonymous users are allowed to nominate for deletion; it states this specifically in the deletion info. pages. TNLTRPB 08:27, 27 February 2006 (UTC)