Mysian language
Template:Short description Script error: No such module "Infobox".Template:Template otherTemplate:Main other MysianTemplate:Efn was spoken by Mysians inhabiting Mysia in north-west Anatolia.
Little is known about the Mysian language. Strabo noted that it was, "in a way, a mixture of the Lydian and Phrygian languages".[1] As such, the Mysian language could be a language of the Anatolian or Phrygian group. However, a passage in Athenaeus suggests that the Mysian language was akin to the barely attested Paeonian language of Paeonia, north of Macedon. Template:Citation needed span
Inscription
Only one inscription is known that may be in the Mysian language. It has seven lines of about 20 signs each, written from right to left (sinistroverse), but the first two lines are very incomplete. The inscription dates from between the 5th and 3rd centuries BCE and was found in 1926 by Christopher William Machell Cox and Archibald Cameron in Üyücek village, 15 km due south of Tavşanlı, in the Tavşanlı district of Kütahya province, near the outskirts of the classical Phrygian territory.[2] The text seems to include Indo-European words.[3][4]
The alphabet used resembles the Old-Phrygian alphabet, but some signs are quite different:[5]
In the past there has been much confusion concerning the sibilants in the alphabet. Initially it was thought that the File:Mysian Y.png sign represented a sibilant, transcribed as š or z, but since 1969 it is known that it actually denoted a /j/ sound, transcribed as y. The File:Mysian S.png sign was thought to be a sound not present in the regular Old-Phrygian alphabet and dubbed the "Mysian s", transcribed as ś, but it was in fact the regular s. The File:Mysian Z.png sign was formerly transcribed s, but it is in fact the equivalent of the Phrygian File:PhrygianZeta R2L.png sign, probably denoting a /z/, /zd/, or /ts/ sound.[6]
It is uncertain whether the inscription renders a text in the Mysian language or if it is simply a Phrygian dialect from the region of Mysia. Brixhe, discussing the existing literature on the inscription, argues that the language is Phrygian.[7] The seventh line can be read as:
- [.]lakes braterais patriyioisk[e]
The words "braterais patriyioisk[e]" have been proposed to mean something like "(for)[8] brothers and fathers / relatives":[9]
- braterais is related to Phrygian βρατερε, Greek φρατήρ, Latin frater, English brother;
- patriyiois is related to New-Phrygian pat(e)res (πατερης, πατρες: 'parents'), Greek πάτριος ('relative of the father'), Latin pater, English father;
- and -ke is a Phrygian suffix meaning and, cf. Greek τε and Latin -que, 'and'.[10]
Lakes (or -lakes, a first sign may be missing; alternatively, according to Friedrich, read ...likeś[11]) is most probably a personal name.[12] However, Friedrich indicates that the reading is variable, and writes "instead of k also p or a conceivably, instead of e[,] v is possible, instead of ś maybe i." (translated from the original German)[13]
Notes
References
External links
- Titus texts:"Mysian" inscriptions
- Palaeolexicon entry for the word ΠΑΤΡΙΖΙ
- Palaeolexicon entry for the word ΒΡΑΤΕΡΑΙΣ
Template:Paleo-Balkan languages Template:Anatolian languages
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1". (in French)
- ↑ Brixhe (2004), pp. 26-29.
- ↑ Brixhe (2004), pp. 32-42.
- ↑ The endings -ais and -ois look like datives Plural, but Brixhe (2004), pp. 41-42, argues that they are probably accusatives Plural. Obrador Cursach agrees: Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Blažek, Václav. “Indo-European kinship terms in *-ə̯2TER.” (2001). In: Grammaticvs: studia linguistica Adolfo Erharto quinque et septuagenario oblata. Šefčík, Ondřej (editor); Vykypěl, Bohumil (editor). Vyd. 1. V Brně: Masarykova univerzita, 2001. p. 24. http://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/123188
- ↑ Obrador Cursach (2018), pp. 159, 216, 267.
- ↑ See J. Friedrich (1932), Kleinasiatische Sprachdenkmäler, 141.
- ↑ See J. Friedrich (1932), Kleinasiatische Sprachdenkmäler, 140–141.
- ↑ See J. Friedrich (1932), Kleinasiatische Sprachdenkmäler, 142, fn. 7.