Wiki143:Articles for deletion/Snootchie bootchies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Redirected to Jay and Silent Bob by Adrian~enwiki (talk) Avi 16:14, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Snootchie bootchies

possibly the least notable neologism ever savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 01:33, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: with 11,400 google hits ^[1], it's not even in the running for that status. Kappa 01:38, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
  • With probably at least two other spellings with equivalent numbers of hits, I'd wager. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 08:39, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or Rewrite This actually is attributable to Jay and Silent Bob, so there is actually a smidge of truth to this, but the article is factually incorrect. (According to an interview with Kevin Smith it is essentially a way of saying something like "Nah, just kidding" without actually saying it.) I could also go along with a merge with Jay and Silent Bob. --Bugwit grunt / scribbles 01:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Actually, there is already a mention of this in the Etymology of Jay's Vocabulary section of the Jay and Silent Bob article, so I'll change to a full delete. --Bugwit grunt / scribbles 02:00, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

• So next time someone types in "Snootchie bootchies" we should invite them to create a new article for us? Kappa 02:04, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

• Redirect to Jay and Silent Bob per scribbles. Kappa 02:04, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Jay and Silent Bob given that it is a phrase used in the movies. It certainly doesn't warrant a standalone article. Capitalistroadster 02:24, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Neologistic, indiscriminate and barely notable. It's not spelled correctly either. -- Krash (Talk) 04:44, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Jay and Silent Bob per Capitalistroadster: notable enough for a redirect but it doesn't need a main article (and certainly not this one). –Sommers ^(Talk) 07:20, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Jay and Silent Bob. Notable catchphrase, but unlikely to be able to sustain its own article. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 08:39, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: Redirected to Jay_and_Silent_Bob. Adrian~enwiki (talk) 09:59, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Jay and Silent Bob Noochies.--Isotope23 14:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.