Wiki143:Articles for deletion/Differences between iTap and T9 (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Babajobu 05:28, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Differences between iTap and T9

Was tagged for speedy deletion by User:Walter Görlitz as being a repost of deleted content (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Differences between iTap and T9) but it's different than the earlier version. Bringing it to AfD instead. howcheng {chat} 20:25, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete And this is encyclopædic because…? Avi 20:30, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. It is not encyclopedic. It is more of an instruction manual than anything else.--Adam File:Flag of the United States.svg^(talk) 20:35, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. iCouldCareLess about T9 or iTap.--み使い Mitsukai 21:00, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. iTap and T9 are probably the two most deployed phone entry systems. A side by side reference comparison can be a useful tool for choosing between them (proof is, there are other good side-by-side product comparisons in Wikipedia). I'd say merge with predictive text or expand with comparisons to the other existing systems - maybe with a table format. Diego Moya 21:38, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Avi. Stifle 18:50, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Merge I actually think this article, iTap and T9 should be merged into one article, perhaps something like 'mobile phone input methods'. This way the two stubs and this offshoot could actually be a useful and robust article instead of little blurbs.Pdurland 19:30, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.