Frobenius theorem (real division algebras)
Template:Short description Script error: No such module "For". In mathematics, more specifically in abstract algebra, the Frobenius theorem, proved by Ferdinand Georg Frobenius in 1877, characterizes the finite-dimensional associative division algebras over the real numbers. According to the theorem, every such algebra is isomorphic to one of the following:
- Template:Math (the real numbers)
- Template:Math (the complex numbers)
- Template:Math (the quaternions)
These algebras have real dimension Template:Math, and Template:Math, respectively. Of these three algebras, Template:Math and Template:Math are commutative, but Template:Math is not.
Proof
The main ingredients for the following proof are the Cayley–Hamilton theorem and the fundamental theorem of algebra.
Introducing some notation
- Let Template:Math be the division algebra in question.
- Let Template:Math be the dimension of Template:Math.
- We identify the real multiples of Template:Math with Template:Math.
- When we write Template:Math for an element Template:Mvar of Template:Mvar, we imply that Template:Mvar is contained in Template:Math.
- We can consider Template:Mvar as a finite-dimensional Template:Math-vector space. Any element Template:Mvar of Template:Mvar defines an endomorphism of Template:Mvar by left-multiplication, we identify Template:Mvar with that endomorphism. Therefore, we can speak about the trace of Template:Mvar, and its characteristic- and minimal polynomials.
- For any Template:Mvar in Template:Math define the following real quadratic polynomial:
- Note that if Template:Math then Template:Math is irreducible over Template:Math.
The claim
The key to the argument is the following
- Claim. The set Template:Mvar of all elements Template:Mvar of Template:Mvar such that Template:Math is a vector subspace of Template:Mvar of dimension Template:Math. Moreover Template:Math as Template:Math-vector spaces, which implies that Template:Mvar generates Template:Mvar as an algebra.
Proof of Claim: Pick Template:Mvar in Template:Mvar with characteristic polynomial Template:Math. By the fundamental theorem of algebra, we can write
We can rewrite Template:Math in terms of the polynomials Template:Math:
Since Template:Math, the polynomials Template:Math are all irreducible over Template:Math. By the Cayley–Hamilton theorem, Template:Math and because Template:Mvar is a division algebra, it follows that either Template:Math for some Template:Mvar or that Template:Math for some Template:Mvar. The first case implies that Template:Mvar is real. In the second case, it follows that Template:Math is the minimal polynomial of Template:Mvar. Because Template:Math has the same complex roots as the minimal polynomial and because it is real it follows that
for some Template:Math. Since Template:Math is the characteristic polynomial of Template:Mvar the coefficient of Template:Math in Template:Math is Template:Math up to a sign. Therefore, we read from the above equation we have: Template:Math if and only if Template:Math, in other words Template:Math if and only if Template:Math.
So Template:Mvar is the subset of all Template:Mvar with Template:Math. In particular, it is a vector subspace. The rank–nullity theorem then implies that Template:Mvar has dimension Template:Math since it is the kernel of . Since Template:Math and Template:Mvar are disjoint (i.e. they satisfy ), and their dimensions sum to Template:Mvar, we have that Template:Math.
The finish
For Template:Math in Template:Mvar define Template:Math. Because of the identity Template:Math, it follows that Template:Math is real. Furthermore, since Template:Math, we have: Template:Math for Template:Math. Thus Template:Mvar is a positive-definite symmetric bilinear form, in other words, an inner product on Template:Mvar.
Let Template:Mvar be a subspace of Template:Mvar that generates Template:Mvar as an algebra and which is minimal with respect to this property. Let Template:Math be an orthonormal basis of Template:Mvar with respect to Template:Math. Then orthonormality implies that:
The form of Template:Mvar then depends on Template:Mvar:
If Template:Math, then Template:Mvar is isomorphic to Template:Math.
If Template:Math, then Template:Mvar is generated by Template:Math and Template:Math subject to the relation Template:Math. Hence it is isomorphic to Template:Math.
If Template:Math, it has been shown above that Template:Mvar is generated by Template:Math subject to the relations
These are precisely the relations for Template:Math.
If Template:Math, then Template:Mvar cannot be a division algebra. Assume that Template:Math. Define Template:Math and consider Template:Math. By rearranging the elements of this expression and applying the orthonormality relations among the basis elements we find that Template:Math. If Template:Mvar were a division algebra, Template:Math implies Template:Math, which in turn means: Template:Math and so Template:Math generate Template:Mvar. This contradicts the minimality of Template:Mvar.
- The fact that Template:Mvar is generated by Template:Math subject to the above relations means that Template:Mvar is the Clifford algebra of Template:Math. The last step shows that the only real Clifford algebras which are division algebras are Template:Math and Template:Math.
- As a consequence, the only commutative division algebras are Template:Math and Template:Math. Also note that Template:Math is not a Template:Math-algebra. If it were, then the center of Template:Math has to contain Template:Math, but the center of Template:Math is Template:Math.
- This theorem is closely related to Hurwitz's theorem, which states that the only real normed division algebras are Template:Math, and the (non-associative) algebra Template:Math.
- Pontryagin variant. If Template:Mvar is a connected, locally compact division ring, then Template:Math, or Template:Math.
See also
- Hurwitz's theorem, classifying normed real division algebras
- Gelfand–Mazur theorem, classifying complex complete division algebras
- Ostrowski's theorem
References
- Ray E. Artz (2009) Scalar Algebras and Quaternions, Theorem 7.1 "Frobenius Classification", page 26.
- Ferdinand Georg Frobenius (1878) "Über lineare Substitutionen und bilineare Formen", Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 84:1–63 (Crelle's Journal). Reprinted in Gesammelte Abhandlungen Band I, pp. 343–405.
- Yuri Bahturin (1993) Basic Structures of Modern Algebra, Kluwer Acad. Pub. pp. 30–2 Template:ISBN .
- Leonard Dickson (1914) Linear Algebras, Cambridge University Press. See §11 "Algebra of real quaternions; its unique place among algebras", pages 10 to 12.
- R.S. Palais (1968) "The Classification of Real Division Algebras" American Mathematical Monthly 75:366–8.
- Lev Semenovich Pontryagin, Topological Groups, page 159, 1966.