Primary challenge

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Revision as of 00:32, 17 October 2024 by imported>Onel5969 (Disambiguating links to Primary election (link changed to Partisan primary) using DisamAssist.)
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Template:Multiple issues

In U.S. politics, a primary challenge is when an incumbent holding elective office is challenged by a member of their own political party in a primary election. Such events, known informally as "being primaried," are noteworthy and not frequent in the United States, as traditionally political parties support incumbents, both for party unity and to minimize the possibility of losing the seat to an opposing party. In addition, officeholders are frequently seen as de facto leaders of their party, eligible to establish policy and administer affairs as they see fit. A primary challenge thus interferes with this "spoil of office," and is largely discouraged. Though typically used to describe challenges to elected officials, the term is also applied to officeholders such as appointed U.S. senators.[1]

Frequency in safe seats

In jurisdictions predominantly under the political control of a single political party, or where the overwhelming majority of registered voters (in jurisdictions that require party registration) belong to a single party (a "safe seat"), there is likely to be less fear of opposing parties gaining sufficient support to mount a credible challenge. In such an area, particularly those that have been gerrymandered, members of the party feel more at ease to challenge current officeholders, because no loss of the seat is expected.

Skewed electorate and issue advocacy group participation

Primary elections in the United States generally draw a very low voter turnout. In addition, only a small portion of the public may be educated on the issue stances of all primary candidates, as primary elections typically use little or no mass media advertising. Party activists, ideologues, and local party leaders may constitute an unusually high number of, or exert disproportionate levels of influence on, those who actually vote.

This situation provides opportunities for organizations focused on a single issue, such as gun control, taxation, or abortion. Such organizations may be able to convince their supporters to endure the difficulty of voting, while other eligible voters may not want to take the trouble for a "minor election."

Notable primary challenges

Presidential

Since the advent of the modern primary election system in 1972, an incumbent president has never been defeated by a primary challenger, though every president who faced a strong primary challenge went on to be defeated in the general election.[2][3]

U.S. Senate

Sabato's Crystal Ball tabulated that from 1946 to 2018, only 4% of primaries with an incumbent U.S. senator running resulted in a win by a primary challenger. This figure includes incumbents running unopposed or against paper candidates, meaning credible primary challengers have a higher rate of success.[8]

U.S. House

From 1946 to 2018, only 1.6% of primaries with an incumbent representative running resulted in a win by a primary challenger. This percentage also includes incumbents running against other incumbents because of House seats being eliminated by reapportioning, which are typically not referred to as primary challenges; if reapportioning years are excluded, less than 1% of primaries with an incumbent running are won by challengers. This also includes incumbents running unopposed or against paper candidates, meaning credible primary challengers have a higher rate of success.[17]

  • 2022: Of the ten Republicans who supported the second impeachment of Donald Trump in 2021, six ran for reelection in 2022, and all faced significant competition in their primaries. All three representatives who competed in partisan primaries–Peter Meijer (Michigan), Tom Rice (South Carolina) and Liz Cheney (Wyoming)–were unseated by Trump-backed challengers. Jaime Herrera Beutler (Washington) failed to advance to the general election after finishing behind a Trump-backed challenger in a blanket primary. Only Dan Newhouse (Washington) and David Valadao (California), who competed in blanket primaries, advanced to the general election; Valadao was the only representative who did not face a Trump-backed challenger.[18]
  • 2018:
  • 2014: David Brat, a college professor and political newcomer, defeated Rep. Eric Cantor of Virginia, the House majority leader, for the Republican nomination in the 7th district in an upset, marking the first time a majority leader had lost a primary.[21]

Governors

As of 2018, 14% of contested primaries with an incumbent governor running resulted in a win by a primary challenger.[22]

References

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. The Iranian Hostage Rescue Mission
  6. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. a b Template:Cite magazine
  8. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  9. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  10. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  11. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  12. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  13. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  14. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  15. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  16. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  17. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  18. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  19. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  20. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  21. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  22. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  23. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

External links

  • G. Terry Madonna and Michael Young, An Electoral Oasis, Politically Uncorrected, Franklin & Marshall College Center for Politics & Public Affairs [1]
  • Bruce E. Cain, Karin Mac Donald and Michael McDonald, From Equality to Fairness: The Path of Political Reform since Baker v Carr, address to the Brookings Institution/Institute of Governmental Studies, Conference on "Competition, Partisanship, and Congressional Redistricting", April 16, 2004 [2]
  • Amity Shlaes, CAFTA vote about more than trade, Jewish World Review, May 18, 2005 [3]