Wiki143:Articles for deletion/List of Counts of Bouillon
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Revision as of 20:26, 26 May 2022 by imported>MalnadachBot (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was moved to Counts of Bouillon. Ξxtreme Unction|yakkity yak 13:25, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
List of Counts of Bouillon
Listcruft, a category should suffice. Stifle 16:43, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
- Move to Counts of Bouillon and expand so it gives some history about who these guys are and why they're significant. Right now Count of Bouillon is a redirect to Duke of Lower Lotharingia and I'm not sure why. In any case I wouldn't call this listcruft, that's the horrible, useless, poorly defined, nearly infinte lists like List of people who drink milk that WP is full of. This one is at least well-defined and severely limited to those who held the title. It just doesn't need to be a separate article. -R. fiend 16:53, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
- Count of Bouillon redirected to Duke of Lower Lorraine because that's where the list of counts originall was (as a vassal of Lower Lorraine, or so I understood at the time). This is a perfectly valid list whatever the title - move and expand as R. fiend says is a good idea, since there aren't so many of them that a list would overwhelm an article. By the way, Stifle, check out List of office-holders for dozens of other similar lists. Adam Bishop 17:10, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep as per Adam Bishop, or move to Count of Bouillon. u p p l a n d 17:19, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and then move to Count of Bouillon. Valid list. Hiding talk 20:29, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.