Meaning postulate

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Revision as of 19:18, 3 June 2025 by imported>Psychastes (Removed {{More citations needed}} tag: citations seem sufficient in number for the size of the article)
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In formal semantics and philosophy of language, a meaning postulate is a way of stipulating a relationship between the meanings of two or more words. They were introduced by Rudolf Carnap as a way of approaching the analytic/synthetic distinction.[1] Subsequently, Richard Montague made heavy use of meaning postulates in the development of Montague grammar,[2] and they have features prominently in formal semantics following in Montague's footsteps.[3]

Examples

Meaning Postulate is a formula to express an aspect of the sense of a predicate. The formula is expressed with - so-called - connectives. The used connectives are:

  paraphrase ≡ "if and only if"
  entailment → "if"
  binary antonomy ~ "not"

Following examples will simplify this:

1. "If and only if X is a man, then X is a human being." In meaning postulate this would look like this:

  x MAN ≡ x HUMAN BEING

2. "If X is a girl, then X is female." In meaning postulate this would look like this:

  x GIRL → x FEMALE

3. "X is not awake, therefore X is asleep." In meaning postulate this would look like this:

  x ASLEEP → ~x AWAKE

See also

References

Template:Reflist

Template:Formal semantics


Template:Semantics-stub

  1. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".