User talk:Sjsv~enwiki
Welcome!
I hope you like this place — I sure do — and want to stay. Before getting too in-depth, please read about the simplified ruleset. If you need help on how to title new articles check out the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Wikipedia:Help and the FAQ , plus if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my user talk page.
Additional tips
Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!
- If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
- You can sign your name using three tildes (~). If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
- If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the articles for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
- If you believe something you added or created has been unfairly treated, talk to the user or follow the steps in resolving disputes
- If you're still entirely confused, or would like to get a better grasp of your wikipedia skills, and you have an IRC client (or don't mind getting one), check out the Bootcamp. It's not what it sounds like, but it is fun and can help you with your editing skills.
- If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.
Happy Wiki-ing.
- Trevor MacInnis(Talk | Contribs) 23:49, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
Thinglink may not be notable
Hi Sjsv. This is a comment on your recent addition of Thinglink to the Digital object identifier article. I'm afraid that some of us have been vigorously resisting new items in the standards-related articles (like ISBN, and DOI) that are not either genuine standards (with international standards documents) or so widely adopted that libraries and governments make use of them (like DOI). 'See also' is a section normally reserved for pointing to other WP articles. So I urge you to consider reverting your change to DOI, unless you believe you can make a strong case for the notability of Thinglink that complies with the standards of WP:WEB at least, and explain why llibrarians and other info professionals should want to use it. EdJohnston 16:05, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
The reason why I added both the reference to the Thinglink WP article, as well as the article itself, is because at this moment there is no 'open source' object identifaction system, that is freely accessible without paying large amounts of money, or without being a professional, officially registered organization. As such, the thinglink system is unique. I am not aware of another system that at this moment allows makers anywhere, to create a unique global persistent identifier for their howebrew creations. I feel that the thinglink fits in the same category as 'free software', 'free documentation' and 'open standards'.--Sjsv 16:16, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
The article MiMMS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable software unreferenced and marked for notability since December 2007.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Template:Tlc notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing Template:Tlc will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:44, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Sjsv. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Sjsv~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
02:45, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed
This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
18:56, 22 April 2015 (UTC)