Talk:Interoperability

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Revision as of 15:17, 30 May 2025 by imported>Otr500 (Add "External links" section and reasoning for moving excessive links here.)
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Latest comment: 30 May by Otr500 in topic External links
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:WikiProject banner shell

Changes

I am responsible for the changes made yesterday, but wasn't signed in (still learning :)) I broadened the definition of IOP and showed two recent case of its' controversial application. --Daniel Spichtinger 7 July 2005 11:58 (UTC)


Interoperability vs. Interoperation

A distinction used within the Open Grid Forum is between interoperability and interoperation, with the former referring to creating a common fabric of interaction that everyone can connect to equally, and the latter being defined piecewise between particular systems (often through the creation of specific software adapters). It is our experience that it is far easier to do interoperation at first, but it is interoperability that builds a real commodity market with maximal benefits to customers. 80.192.153.143 13:27, 24 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

hyperlinks are not relevant

I removed some hyperlinks because they are not relevant with the subject. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aboujraf (talkcontribs) 14:36, 6 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

The technical definition of interoperability need changed I believe... 'Interoperability is a property referring to the ability of diverse systems and organizations to work together (inter-operate)'. [in a manner as previously agree to or as each expect.] without adding this then the systems do not act as expected from each side and nothing is gained. Rikdrummond (talk) 15:01

File:Intellilink shows Interoperability Solutions.pdf Nominated for speedy Deletion

File:Image-x-generic.svg An image used in this article, File:Intellilink shows Interoperability Solutions.pdf, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:53, 6 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Errors in Article

In the Software section, the article erroneously cites ISO/IEC 2382-01 as relevant. That directive is superceded for information technology standards by ISO/IEC JTC 1 Directives. See section 1.1 (superceding and making interoperability mandatory). The relative definition is in Annex I: "interoperability is understood to be the ability of two or more IT systems to exchange information at one or more standardised interfaces and to make mutual use of the information that has been exchanged. An IT system is a set of IT resources providing services at one or more interfaces."
That definition is in close accord with competition law in the European Union governing software. Commission v. Microsoft, No. T‑167/08, European Community Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber Judgment of 17 September, 2007), para. 230, 374, 421, (rejecting Microsoft's argument that "interoperability" has a 1-way rather than 2-way meaning; information technology specifications must be disclosed with sufficient specificity to place competitors on an "equal footing" in regard to interoperability; "the 12th recital to Directive 91/250 defines interoperability as 'the ability to exchange information and mutually to use the information which has been exchanged'"). Marbux (talk) 18:26, 28 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Interoperability. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:28, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Interoperability. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:17, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

SMS example

Script error: No such module "user". has added a picture and caption that claims that SMS is interoperable. This is technically an accurate claim WRT SMS but most (American) readers will be aware that there are interoperability issues in text messaging in general most obviously due to how iMessage works. Is there a better example we could use? ~Kvng (talk) 16:03, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Maybe changing the caption text to say "(in most cases) fully interoperable"? Sucrehypsy (talk) 19:17, 6 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Then the reader askes, In which cases not? Then do we add a note explaining the whole mess? Wouldn't it be better to just find a cleaner example? ~Kvng (talk) 21:05, 6 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

External links

Some things just grow during incremental edits and sometimes get out of hand. The "External links" section, one of the optional appendices, has grown to 7 entries. Three seems to be an acceptable number, and of course, everyone has their favorite to try to add for a fourth. Consensus needs to determine this.
However, none is needed for article promotion.
Some links may be included in WP:ELNO, WP:NOTREPOSITORY, or WP:NOTGUIDE. Others, listed below:
External links This page in a nutshell: Template:Tq
Second paragraph, Template:Tq
Moved links: