Talk:Iroquois-class destroyer
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Iroquois-class destroyer Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Template:WikiProject banner shell
Comments
Edited 11 Jun 05 to remove HMCS HURON from Ships listing, as it has been decommissioned.
'In 1995 Athabaskan was involved in missile firing practice on the Puerto Rican range. Due to absolute incompetence in the training of Nesop personnel, (they are the crew who actually fire the weapon systems)this ship almost shot down a German Tornado aircraft and most probably a civilian airliner.If not for a technical fault in the missile itself it is likely that one of these aircraft would have been fired at and destroyed. This event was covered up by Canadian Navy personnel. No board of inquiry was ever held into these events. ' This section should either be supported by a reference, deleted or labelled 'allegably'. I find it hard to believe such an incident could happen and then be covered up successfully. Too many nationalities involved. 145.253.108.22 11:00, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
These should redirect here, being the other name of the class, and independant of Tribal-class destroyer (1905) & Tribal class destroyer (1936) -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 04:37, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Iroquois-class destroyer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add Template:Tlx after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add Template:Tlx to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090703062007/http://www.navy.forces.gc.ca:80/iroquois/1/1-s_eng.asp?category=1&title=570 to http://www.navy.forces.gc.ca/iroquois/1/1-s_eng.asp?category=1&title=570
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:22, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Suggested Edit - Move Dates of TRUMP upgrade to table
There is a table listing ships, information and life dates- but the dates that the TRUMP upgrade was done is listed seperated within a paragraph. I recommend move from there to within the table. Wfoj3 (talk) 20:02, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Every detail about ship hull life in infobox
per Template:Infobox ship begin/Usage guide - Template:Xt Llammakey (talk) 12:54, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- And yet information about significant rebuilds has been included in the infobox for ships elsewhere for years without problem. See Iowa-class battleship, Spruance-class destroyer, Italian cruiser Giuseppe Garibaldi (1936), USS Albany (CA-123), HMS Rapid (H32), USS California (BB-44), St. Laurent-class destroyer, Restigouche-class destroyer, and Annapolis-class destroyer. These rebuilds have previously been considered significant enough elsewhere, including in articles you have contributed significantly to, to be included in such a summary due to the degree to which they altered their characteristics and fighting performance and as this was a universal program applied to the whole class it similarly belongs here. LifeBeyondLiving (talk) 01:18, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- It seems to be standard practice to include details of major rebuilds like TRUMP in the infobox, as LifeBeyondLiving mentioned. If it is not standard practice, other articles which do this should perhaps be changed according. MK Regular (talk) 01:37, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not an acceptable argument. But this seems like I am going to be outvoted on the basis of that so I am just going to unwatch this page. Have a good day. Llammakey (talk) 12:36, 17 January 2025 (UTC)