Talk:Actors' Equity Association

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Revision as of 17:28, 25 January 2025 by imported>ClueBot III (Archiving 11 discussions to Talk:Actors' Equity Association/Archive 1. (BOT))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Latest comment: 27 September 2020 by 0m9Ep in topic Encyclopedic tone
Jump to navigation Jump to search

<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".

Template:WikiProject banner shell User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis

Clarifications

I don't understand the use of the word "book" in "live stage productions without a book"; would someone please expand the article to explain? It seems maybe it is a term industry insiders recognize but an encyclopedia is for everyone.

Also how does one join this union? Are there restrictions or preconditions? Is membership required for some types of work? Does joining bring other advantages? It seems this article could support several more details if someone has the knowledge to add them. Thanks. 72.208.62.126 (talk) 12:42, 26 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Actors' Equity Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:56, 26 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Adding a 1919 Actors' Equity Association strike section

Hi Wikipedians, I am in a Technical and Professional Editing class and have been working on the 1919 Actors' Equity Association strike article as part of a project for the past few weeks. I noticed that this article has a section for the 1929 strike, so I wanted to propose adding a section for the 1919 strike that would include an overview of the strike as well as a "See main article" link that directs to that page. It seems like some of the content about this strike is currently included in the second paragraph of the history section, so I was thinking that content would be part of this new section instead. What are your thoughts? Slaurensk (talk) 04:17, 17 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Go for it AW (talk) 03:55, 7 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Post-Kruse era and IWA/WIR?

What are these? They aren’t linked and aren’t clear. AW (talk) 03:55, 7 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Encyclopedic tone

The use of "you" and "yours" in the lead. 0m9Ep (talk) 15:46, 27 September 2020 (UTC)Reply