Talk:Adjunction space

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Revision as of 19:58, 22 January 2024 by imported>Cewbot (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Mathematics}}.)
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Latest comment: 16 November 2015 by Yahya Abdal-Aziz in topic Some history, please
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:WikiProject banner shell

Untitled

The first example probably was an attempt to show how all CW-complexes are built up, but the description was too vague so I replaced it with a specific example of a CW-complex which is easier to describe for now. - Gauge 05:42, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

disjoint union

At the risk of being fussy, I suggest that the symbol for disjoint union operation be changed to or from the present ⨿ to be consistent with the article Disjoint union. - Subh83 (talk | contribs) 19:51, 26 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Never mind that. The present notation is the standard for topological spaces. - Subh83 (talk | contribs) 19:55, 26 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Well, I studied quite a bit of topology (years ago) and the symbol confused me - it looks like a damaged upper-case π with Roman lettering type serifs or . Perhaps we could link the symbol to the article Disjoint union? yoyo (talk) 08:34, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Some history, please

We need more information in the article, for example:

  • What's the history of the term "adjunction space"?
  • Who first used it?
  • Who first defined it?
  • Why use "adjunction"?
  • And does it relate to a natural notion of "adjunct" elements in the space?
  • If so, how is the adjunct element defined?

yoyo (talk) 10:14, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply