Wiki143:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 April 15

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wiki143:Categories for deletion
Revision as of 15:06, 14 November 2022 by imported>Sheep8144402 (fix linter errors (14x obsolete font tags))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


April 15

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 17:42, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:Tranportation in Ottawa-Carleton Region

  • misnamed and empty. Burgundavia 04:42, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep category:Elections in the Republic of Ireland and delete category:Elections in Ireland. --Kbdank71 13:37, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:Elections in the Republic of Ireland

Only one article in category, replaced by Category:Elections in Ireland --BaronLarf 01:00, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 17:57, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Sub-categories of Category:Italian-Americans

Per the listings below for unnecessary sub-categories of Jewish people:

If any of these groupings should exist, it should be in list article form, not as categories. Delete all. Postdlf 22:38, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete all. --Kbdank71 16:46, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete all -- Viajero 17:55, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete all as lately these "categories by ethnicity" are getting out of hand. IZAK 06:50, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was rename --Kbdank71 18:11, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:Famous streets in Washington, D.C. and Category:Famous California streets

If it ain't famous, it ain't gonna have an article. Rename both to "Streets in...", ala Category:Streets in New York City. However, the parent is named Category:Roads in the United States. I'm unaware of any significant semantic difference between "street" and "road" so I don't really care which one it follows, just as long as the "famous" is dropped from these two. Postdlf 22:12, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • Agree. The categories are useful, but the names are inappropriate. Drop "famous". -Willmcw 07:03, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy rename --Kbdank71 18:33, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:Symptom

Should be in plural form -> Category:Symptoms --Hooperbloob 13:45, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Shouldn't this now qualify for speedy renaming? RedWolf 06:39, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)
Yep. I'll add it to the Speedy rename section. --Kbdank71 18:33, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Right you are, RedWolf. If someone wants to nominate Category:Sign (medicine), please feel free. --Kbdank71 18:33, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Kbdank71 14:15, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Re:Sub-Categories of Jewish people

Category:Austrian Jews

(An orphan. All the info is in List of Austrian Jews already.)

Category:British Jews

(An orphan, all the information is in List of British Jews already)

Category:Dutch Jews

(An orphan. The information can be placed in Category:Jewish Dutch history.)

Category:Italian Jews

(An orphan. Information can be found in Category:Jewish Italian history.)

Category:Jewish Romanians

(An orphan. Information can be added into List of Jewish Romanians.)

Category:Russian Jews

(All the information is in List of Russian Jews which it duplicates.)

Note: In fairness, there was a Vote to Delete [1] this sub-category when it was named "Category:Jewish Russian people" during Dec '04-Jan '05. The vote was to "Keep" and rename to "Category:Russian Jews". See Category talk:Russian Jews. However, the proliferation of "Jewish people" categories should allow re-thinking of the desirability of having so many duplicate sources on Wikipedia (part of the "List vs. Categ" debate in some way). Meaning, Russian Jews are already on their "List" and that list is part of Category:Lists of Jews, so they are in the categories already, and thus this category is a duplicate. IZAK 10:45, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • No vote. Mixed feelings on whether a category adds anything to a list here, but Russian Jewish culture and identity are distinct enough from Russian culture and identity as to constitute a viable category. -- Jmabel | Talk 05:24, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)

Category:Spanish Jews

(Orphan. Information to be added to Category:Jewish Spanish history.)

Category:Jewish Americans

(Excessive repeat of all information to be found in Category:Lists of Jewish Americans and in List of Jewish Americans.)

Category:Jewish American artists

(Excessive repeat of all information to be found in Category:Lists of Jewish Americans and in List of Jewish American artists.)

Category:Jewish American economists

(Excessive repeat of all information to be found in Category:Lists of Jewish Americans and in List of Jewish American academics.)

Category:Jewish American musicians

(Excessive repeat of all information to be found in Category:Lists of Jewish Americans and in List of Jewish American musicians.)

Category:Jewish American philosophers

(Excessive repeat of all information to be found in Category:Lists of Jewish Americans and in List of Jewish American academics.)

Category:Jewish American politicians

(Excessive repeat of all information to be found in Category:Lists of Jewish Americans and in List of Jewish American political figures.)

Category:Jewish American scientists

(Excessive repeat of all information to be found in Category:Lists of Jewish Americans and in List of Jewish American scientists.)

Category:Jewish American writers

(Excessive repeat of all information to be found in Category:Lists of Jewish Americans and in List of Jewish American writers.)

  • Delete all the above. The splintering of categories about Jewish people is getting out of hand, and must be tightened. Too many "frivolous categories" (as in "Frivolous lawsuits") for Jews are being created on Wikipedia. The above sub-categories about Jews (many of whom did not even care to be identified as such!) are proposed for deletion because they are either empty/orphans, or their contents can correctly be found in other similar categories Category:Lists of Jews of lists -- or of Category:Lists of Jewish Americans, or they are basically duplicates of "List" articles in categories by country such as Category:Jewish Spanish history that can include the information. IZAK 09:09, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete all. I would question the use of categorizing people by ethnicity, religion, etc., at all unless this was something the people themselves considered important (e.g., Benjamin Disraeli, Baruch Spinoza, but not Sarah Jessica Parker.) I am involved in similar issues related to Norwegian-Americans, and the list is sparse because at some point it becomes meaningless. Karl Rumsfeld may have Norwegian ancestry, but it isn't useful in any respect. --Leifern 11:04, 2005 Apr 15 (UTC)
  • If the information is there in lists already, then delete' the categories. Grutness|hello? File:Grutness.jpg 11:07, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete all. --Kbdank71 13:12, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete all. Once I was a supporter of these, but changed my mind for several reasons. Mikkalai 14:57, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete all. Too narrow; next we'll have Category:20th century Jewish American writers, then Category:20th century Jewish American Science Fiction writers, then. And even though there are at least two dozen successful authors who would fit that last category, it's still too narrow. Jayjg (talk) 16:32, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Most of these categories are just the product of a fact that one person is both Jewish and [something else]. Little more is gained from these cross-sectional categories. Soon we'd have other modifiers for their sexual orientations, car ownership and whether eat gebrokts or not on Passover. JFW | T@lk 16:51, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete all of 'em. Good catch, IZAK.--Josiah 18:29, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
  • Careful Delete It would be nice if a bot could walk back up through the hierarchy and relink the subjects to the first node that didn't have a Jewish association. For example people tagged as Category:Jewish American economists would then become Category:American economists --Hooperbloob 21:23, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete and follow Hooperbloob's suggestion for correction. Postdlf 22:12, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete all of the "Jewish American such-and-such profession" categories, if they are being used at the expense of including Jews with other Americans. Jewish culture in America is not that distinct from American culture in general. I certainly agree with Hooperbloob about making sure these are added to the corresponding "American such-and-such profession" categories. Perhaps retain Category:Jewish American: I suspect that if we get rid of it, it will simply resurface, anyway. -- Jmabel | Talk 05:29, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Viajero 17:58, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?title=Wiki143:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2005_April_15&oldid=1289320"